@@actually5004 You can get it down to three parts using one wing (again with fuel) a command pod (with Reaction wheel) and the goliath engine. The goliath has an integrated intake.
I went through that and looked it at that thing shot by shot to recreate it, it is complete garbage. Way too much oxidizer, and it only has enough fuel to just barely make it to LKO. If you want an SSTO of his that's capable, build Blunderbird 2, or the Dragon from his Jool 5.
@@SRFriso94 you know... Matt's ssto doesn't use oxidizer u can just remove the oxidizer entirely if you don't know.. he don't use the closed cycle mode for the R.a.p.i.e.r. engine he use the nerve when out of the atmosphere
You missed me: I make small planes that go really fast and have crazy good stall speed characteristics while maintaining good energy retention in a turn... I got carried away making jet fighters with BD armoury lol
Fun fact: if you make a micro fighter using a rapier and relatively good aerodynamics you can go upwards of Mach 10. It got to the point where my biggest problem was heating. I love using it to intercept my friends’ high altitude bombers
I'll define myself as an "overloader" because i always work with like MK1 and MK2 pieces but always full them with extra stuff "just in case" like "this is a pretty cool antenna", "here are some space batteries", "a cool backup parachute system", "I'll definitively need rcs" "this unmmaned guidance system goes here to let the crew rest" and so on. xD
I'm one of those "I have no idea how to land so I cover the top of the plane with parachutes and use landing gear struts that stick into the ground to act as a brake when I land on a slope" type of player.
Ideas for next video: The optimizer 34kg of liquid fuel remaining after a 7 hour mission with 28 gravity assists? Lets revert to vehicle assembly building and do some more tweaking. The parallel operator: 12 hours to next maneuver node? Better go to mission controll and find something to launch in the mean time. The financial analyst: with this craft I can do 7 tourist missions to kerbin orbit in one launch with a 120% profit margin, this optimizes ingame cash per real time hour and represents a 6% improvement over my previous design.
My first thought on seeing your minimalist plane is that it was still more complicated than you needed it to be. For example, you could swap to one of the wing types that carry fuel. They're a lot more efficient than tanks.. So, I think you can all can guess what type of KSP pilot I am, lol.
I like to think myself as a MiG pilot. Everything I make looks like it was made by a Soviet engineer in the 60's. And for some reason most payloads looks like missiles
I couldn't ever master landing, or steering, so my plane just deployed parachutes when I wanted to stop. It never went particularly fast, so it worked just fine.
@@RufflesKerman No, that's wrong! The suit comes from the DLC™ mod. You can find it in the KSP store page. Honestly, I think that mod (and another one with an old looking suit. The creator made that mod so recently, I don't understand why he/she made it be so old) is so important that the KSP devs decided to put it on the store page. I mean, the "Near Future" mods are much better and have much more contend than the two mods on the store page. But I guess the devs can do whatever that want to do...
What about the sadistic guy that gets bored with the actual game and builds death contraptions for fun? I've got this one that's a huge fuel tank with external seats mounted radially. On top, there's a spinning aparatus with rocket engines pointed directly downward at the seats. Simply adjust throttle for cook time. After all the kerbals are cooked, it's got a remote guidance unit that can fly it directly into the VAB for extra fun.
I’m the type of pilot to build a genuinely cool looking craft but then add those unnecessary wings at the front and then 20 midair backflips later decide to remove them
Im a this should fly fine and a big plane guy, my planes are so dangerous that anywhere with kerbals on board have to be ejectable and have parachutes, the only one to successfully fly I left landed next to the hangar on display
For anyone struggling with the problem at 1:06, hold ALT and the parts will only connect by the nodes.
I HAVE BEEN PLAYING THIS GAME FOR NEARLY A DECADE HOW DID I NOT KNOW THAT
Thanks for the tip mate
Thx for the useful tip!
HOW HAVEN'T I KNOWN THAT FOR THE WHOLE TIME PLAYING KSP?!
Tank for the tip.
"The large plane guy"
Yeah, i can fly your space station to orbit in one launch. NBD.
sounds like matt lowne bringing the iss in one launch
@@insertnamehere7712 Bruuuuh Lmao
Can confirm I am the "large plane guy". They are actually really easy to make if you know what you're doing.
@@johnadler6987 i agree
The throttle thing for the newbie was relatable I spent like five outs trynna figure it out
Same😅
This is what tutorial is for.
@@jedinight235
They were all for staging and solid boosters though and all the others were super complicated
What are settings for? I always look for key bindings in games, if i dont inderstand how something work.
@@O5MO
What
0:53 any landing you can walk away from, right?
Whoever goes up must come down
Unless something is seriously wrong
I used SRB's for a cargo plane when I was first trying to build aircraft, how the times have changed
I’m trying to use SRBs to beat the air speed record
They *are* good for takeoff assistance
And now you use nuclear propulsion)
Hello can i as'k something.?? What this name game and for PC or Mobile.???
@@winnabakery9998 This is Kerbal Space Program. Its on PC and Console.
A minimalist using two fuel tanks, and more than one landing gear? Don’t make me sick
With balance you can just use 1 wing (with fuel in it), 1 intake, 1 engine (with thrust vectoring), and a seat.
Of course, part welding mods exist.
@@actually5004 You can get it down to three parts using one wing (again with fuel) a command pod (with Reaction wheel) and the goliath engine. The goliath has an integrated intake.
@@pdes_ Wouldn't a Goliath be Quite... Overkill?
@@nukl3argam3r38 sir... this is ksp?
how many do u use -1
Minimalist: Me when playing science or career mode
Big Planes: Me
That Guy Who Makes Rovers: Me
Then there’s just “matt lowne” and it’s just his interstellar SSTO from “into the warp”
I went through that and looked it at that thing shot by shot to recreate it, it is complete garbage. Way too much oxidizer, and it only has enough fuel to just barely make it to LKO. If you want an SSTO of his that's capable, build Blunderbird 2, or the Dragon from his Jool 5.
@@SRFriso94 you know... Matt's ssto doesn't use oxidizer u can just remove the oxidizer entirely if you don't know.. he don't use the closed cycle mode for the R.a.p.i.e.r. engine he use the nerve when out of the atmosphere
This channel reeks of potential
Don't stop making high quality videos and people will start noticing
In defense of roverguy, sometimes you need a rover on your non-Kerbin base.
I think it meant people who build rovers on kerbin
@@jn.r It makes sense to test them before launching them tho
@@Chuckiele building and praying is what I do
@@jn.r easy science, rovers are so easy and cheap. I have perfected the rover
You missed me: I make small planes that go really fast and have crazy good stall speed characteristics while maintaining good energy retention in a turn... I got carried away making jet fighters with BD armoury lol
Wait but how you land a kerbals on a land on the fast planes? Do ya make parachutes?
You use air brakes
Fun fact: if you make a micro fighter using a rapier and relatively good aerodynamics you can go upwards of Mach 10. It got to the point where my biggest problem was heating. I love using it to intercept my friends’ high altitude bombers
From the fact that I thought the "large" plane was small, I guess I know what type I am
I'll define myself as an "overloader" because i always work with like MK1 and MK2 pieces but always full them with extra stuff "just in case" like "this is a pretty cool antenna", "here are some space batteries", "a cool backup parachute system", "I'll definitively need rcs" "this unmmaned guidance system goes here to let the crew rest" and so on. xD
1:04 :The newbie.
Wow,how do newbies learned how to find parts they needed perfectly.
Who wouldnt
@@ajaxcuul3614 A newbie
@@lr8198 I don’t even play the game and even I would know the parts bruh
@@lr8198 of course not all of them but still
By watching YT vids
3:39 me in a jet in war thunder
Phantoms be like, *snaps your wing for slightly touching pitch and roll*
Everyone has already tried to push the throttle up with the mouse once
Confession, I have never successfully landed a plane on a runway, I always needed way more margin of error for my approach
You forgot the "Forgot/didn't know about air intake" guy
I feel like I’m a mixture of all these people
2:14 he inspired me to make "The super crazy SSTO" that surprisingly flies
This is probably one of the only realistic depictions of a newbie among all "types of gamers" videos in general.
I'm one of those "I have no idea how to land so I cover the top of the plane with parachutes and use landing gear struts that stick into the ground to act as a brake when I land on a slope" type of player.
Idk how u got footage from my computer to use for the newbie section but im not happy about it
What I love is how all of these planes are better than ones I make- even the rover flies better, and that doesn’t even fly!
0:59 probably genuinely me when i had first started trying to make a plane, i actually had a lot of trouble...
Ideas for next video: The optimizer 34kg of liquid fuel remaining after a 7 hour mission with 28 gravity assists? Lets revert to vehicle assembly building and do some more tweaking.
The parallel operator: 12 hours to next maneuver node? Better go to mission controll and find something to launch in the mean time.
The financial analyst: with this craft I can do 7 tourist missions to kerbin orbit in one launch with a 120% profit margin, this optimizes ingame cash per real time hour and represents a 6% improvement over my previous design.
My first thought on seeing your minimalist plane is that it was still more complicated than you needed it to be. For example, you could swap to one of the wing types that carry fuel. They're a lot more efficient than tanks..
So, I think you can all can guess what type of KSP pilot I am, lol.
Big plane is very small. I've got pre-robotic parts mining VTOL SSTOs several times that size.
what are pre-robotic parts?
I like to think myself as a MiG pilot. Everything I make looks like it was made by a Soviet engineer in the 60's. And for some reason most payloads looks like missiles
That "Newbie" one was TOO realistic.
"the small plane guy" now makes me wonder what does he count as a large plane
1:35 AWESOME Man!
0:53 - i wonder of what are made kerbals that they are more resistant than most of parts in KSP
Ive dropped jeb from orbit all the way back down lol
Bruh, when he said "How does the throttle work?" I got flashbacks
The Wunderwaffen engineer: makes the Ho 229 (which spoiler alert flies perfectly), Me 262, Me P1101, Ta 183, Ta 252, ...
I was playing ksp right about when the moar boosters update came out and a new friend tought we now need more boosters to lift of the ground
I couldn't ever master landing, or steering, so my plane just deployed parachutes when I wanted to stop.
It never went particularly fast, so it worked just fine.
3:48 this felt like a personal attack
The "not too big plane" is nothing compared to my Saggitarius spaceplane
Me: gets probe to duna multiple times:
Also my spaceplanes: 1:42
same
the most accurate part about this video is how everything ends up crashing
you forgot one ... "the drunkard" ;) lol , nice vid !
Large Plane Guy just pulled a post stall maneuver after take off in an instant :/
(yeah "Post Stall Maneuver" is from ace combat pls don't hurt me)
“The Minimalist” and “the Large Plane guy” are each other’s worst nightmare.
You have no idea how accurate the newbie one is...
That guy who makes rover could be called rovermaniac
3:06 the amount of aerodynamic to weight ratio, that's your problem
*that guy who makes rovers*
there's some real sickos who play this game.
3:55 I made Super Formula 19 with realistic aerodynamics
Then there’s me: Taking my “Ol’ reliable” X-22, making minor changes, sending him out, and crash landing in the water.
3:35 was that an afterburner or am i wrong. If yes then how to activate it.
The minimalist: basically a V-1 flying bomb.
XD this is true lol. Also the guy with the tiny plane, what mod is the suit
It is from the breaking ground expansion.
@@RufflesKerman No, that's wrong! The suit comes from the DLC™ mod. You can find it in the KSP store page. Honestly, I think that mod (and another one with an old looking suit. The creator made that mod so recently, I don't understand why he/she made it be so old) is so important that the KSP devs decided to put it on the store page. I mean, the "Near Future" mods are much better and have much more contend than the two mods on the store page.
But I guess the devs can do whatever that want to do...
@@torfley breaking ground is a dlc lmao
@@lonelee5353 ... Why did I even write that?
The whole thing is wrong.
Why does "DLC" have a trademark?
Wtf
@@torfley no idea lmao
The Large Plane Guy needs to up his game. He's got nothing on my monstrosities :D
My brain just split in half after watching the noob
2:54 gAS GaS GaS IM GonNA StEp On DA Gas
Dude cool you add the newbies cos newbies are more..........CREATIVE DUDE!!!
4:18 cause its kerbal SPACE program not kerbal car program
Nobody:
Death star engineers: "It needs to be bigger."
What about the sadistic guy that gets bored with the actual game and builds death contraptions for fun? I've got this one that's a huge fuel tank with external seats mounted radially. On top, there's a spinning aparatus with rocket engines pointed directly downward at the seats. Simply adjust throttle for cook time. After all the kerbals are cooked, it's got a remote guidance unit that can fly it directly into the VAB for extra fun.
Postroi airbas A380🤣
Bro I spent 5 years trying to work the throttle and gave up and used soild rocket engines until I look it up
I’m the type of pilot to build a genuinely cool looking craft but then add those unnecessary wings at the front and then 20 midair backflips later decide to remove them
I might have cackled at the big plane guy
I thought of at least 10 different improvements for the first one
1:53 THIS looks so stupid thag it's funny.
I dont even play KSP and yet I got more intelligence in the KSP parts then the newbie
1:27 my friend build the exact same thing his first plane
I'm definitely a large plane guy
I remember basing my first planes on rocket boosters)
The second plane the large plane guy made looks kinda like the lookheed sr71 blackbird
used to be "the newbie" now I'm the Large plane guy
Large plane guy made a mistake I used to make, when I was a newbie large plane guy.
*NOT ENOUGH STRUTS*
3:03 The plane that floats on water perfectly
Me: goes Mach 4 with ease BUT can't Build a Plane that Makes Turns
Day 1 of watching this video every day.
Im a this should fly fine and a big plane guy, my planes are so dangerous that anywhere with kerbals on board have to be ejectable and have parachutes, the only one to successfully fly I left landed next to the hangar on display
Let's just say I'm a nautical engineer based on my records
Same
i think when or if i get ksp I'll probably be the jack of all trades
I think I'm the large plane guy, but I'm not entirely certain, because I never finish my plane.. I keep exceeding the part limit
The big plane dude is cool
I thought "The Newbie" was being built backwards, now I'm sad it wasn't
3:50 .i make cars,not rovers,but my decorations make my car fly
And then there is me which make 2000 ton planes.
it flies perfectly but it doesnt land perfecly lmao😂😂
Nice and quite accurate, but you missed one. The guy who only does sci fi.
WT about the people who make parasite planes?
thanks for big plane idea
Hahaha i came back for the MUSIC
2:10 Literally Matt Lowne in the old days
And then the me who thinks of something nice but ends up with something not actually too bad
3:43 Fatal crash known as SpaceFly flight 567.
You should see the field by the runway in my game no fatiltys but lots of broken planes.
You should of had the noob make the plane in the rocket builder
2:00
Even my first planes were better than that. Unstable, but they used jets and intakes.
When I started playing there weren't even wings.
Building in KSP? Never heard that.
when i was a new player i didn't even know how to move camera or place lol
Why make a rover when you can build a plane and explore the skys
Outro music?