Top 10 C-Store Ships in Star Trek Online (March 2023 Update)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 31 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 120

  • @Stu1701
    @Stu1701  10 місяців тому

    This video is out of date! Because sure to check out the latest Top 10 C-store Ships video for March 2024! ua-cam.com/video/yRw3df7rEzc/v-deo.htmlsi=LPm2eVEyJWIonwCF

  • @mrtencza
    @mrtencza Рік тому +47

    We have been seeing some great new ships in the C-store, but now we need some new Klingon, Romulan, and Dominion ships.

    • @Spamsmoothie1701
      @Spamsmoothie1701 Рік тому +2

      @@gusty9053 With the right hull material, the Bortesque isn't bad in my opinion. Otherwise, I definitely agree with you. All the non-canon STO Klingon ships are hideous. I think most of the Romulan ships are too. However, the Ra'nodaire is one of my favorite designs. I also like some of the Scimitar variants.

    • @cmdrhb8659
      @cmdrhb8659 Рік тому +3

      Klingon needs love adly

  • @PirateScumGaming
    @PirateScumGaming Рік тому +7

    Great vid! I know the Bozeman is technically a Reliant Class but I've always viewed it as the updated Soyuz Class, which is the skin i use on my Bozeman.

    • @Stu1701
      @Stu1701  Рік тому +1

      You're not wrong, it's basically the Bozeman version of the Reliant.

  • @salenstormwing
    @salenstormwing Рік тому +1

    I gotta say I love the Monitor Carrier, partly because it's a Fed Full Carrier that's not the Jupiter, but also because it gives Tetryon some love with its console.

    • @Stu1701
      @Stu1701  Рік тому +1

      There's also the Seneca but yeah, Monitor is a fun ship.

    • @salenstormwing
      @salenstormwing Рік тому

      @@Stu1701 Oh, right, I forgot about the Seneca. Weird how we had 1 true Fed carrier (that wasn't full of kitties) and in like the span of the spring we've gotten 2 more? Weird.

  • @jayew3161
    @jayew3161 Рік тому +6

    Great choices! I have been having a lot of fun with the Monitor. It’s a surprisingly good ship.

    • @Stu1701
      @Stu1701  Рік тому +1

      Monitor is a fun ship! Not something that I think is for everyone, but definitely one I've enjoyed.

    • @cmdrhb8659
      @cmdrhb8659 Рік тому

      Pretty too scratches that nebular

  • @mattbrown817
    @mattbrown817 Рік тому

    My favorite reviews from you are these kinds of ships, the longer the better.

  • @AltaniNerdAuRa
    @AltaniNerdAuRa Рік тому +1

    The Eagle is like the Starfleet ASDB looked at the Defiant and decided that was not scary enough, went to the Klingons and got the specs on that prototype B'rel.
    To paraphrase a segment from Habitual Linecrosser video featuring the F-22 Raptor. "The Eagle-Class is a Stealth Defiant from the 26th Century that forgot to take its Ritalin."
    The Eagle is literally the Starship version of the F-22 Raptor.

  • @Samuraith2077
    @Samuraith2077 Рік тому

    I still need to finish the lazy boat Lexington you put out for a build a ways back, great vid!

  • @sunburncity1994
    @sunburncity1994 Рік тому +1

    Stu, content is terrific! Thank you! Would you do or have you done, a C-Store Ship list for Romulan Characters?

    • @Stu1701
      @Stu1701  Рік тому +1

      There's a Romulan version of the Temporal Warship. I hadn't thought about a list of faction specific ships since all ships are cross-faction now.

    • @sunburncity1994
      @sunburncity1994 Рік тому

      @@Stu1701 appreciate the reply!

  • @MatthewBluefox
    @MatthewBluefox Рік тому +2

    If the Vorta were a playable race in the Dominion mini-faction, I'd prully have a full set of characters (tac, sci, eng) in that faction.

  • @Vapor413
    @Vapor413 Рік тому

    Have been flying the Hestia for a long time and loved it. Then Lady Lex came out and loved her also. Splitting my time right now between the Hydra and Excelsior II.

  • @HmmChunkyLizard
    @HmmChunkyLizard Рік тому

    The Terran Lexington is also my favorite ship! It's currently my main ship and will be for a long time.

  • @jfbrko290
    @jfbrko290 Рік тому +1

    Would love to see the wingmen mechanic with unique ship visuals on non-jem ships. Maybe only for carriers or big ships with one hangar bay maybe? Imagine flying a neghvar or bortasqu and having a pair of b'rels or something.

    • @ornatus9616
      @ornatus9616 Рік тому +2

      The wingman mechanic should be on the Hydra while using MVAM.

    • @Delphineas
      @Delphineas Рік тому

      Would love to see it on Carriers, Flagships, and Command Cruisers.

  • @Jagaroth_
    @Jagaroth_ Рік тому +10

    Just a slight correction...Romulan-wise it's the Morrigu Heavy Warbird with Emergency Weapon Cycle, not the Mogai, but I'm sure you knew that already! 🙂

  • @BETRvids
    @BETRvids 2 місяці тому

    Honestly, if they gave the Wingman trait from Jem'Hadar ships to standard carriers across the board, I feel like that would help carriers stand out more against other ships with hangar bays, such as Flight Deck Carriers and Strike Escorts.
    i've always been a big fan of carriers across many different games, but I've always disliked how underpowered carriers feel in Star Trek Online. These days, I use a multi-mission science vessel in order to gain access to the pets so I still feel like a carrier, but focus more on exotic damage. But every now and again, I'll hop onto my Jem'Hadar character to use the carrier on there. With the wingmen and their abilities, I can dish out some major damage and support for my allies. It would be really nice though if I could have wingmen on my Jupiter or something.

  • @RealCaptainJaws
    @RealCaptainJaws Рік тому

    Thank-you so much for making this content; my wife and I are new to the game, and I'm having SO MUCH FUN! I can't believe I sat on this and now it's so old, I easily could have missed it entirely. I hit level 40 on my Romulan Alien Tactical Officer (GREAT recommendation), and currently have what FEELS like an awesome stealth/dual-cannon build. Reading forums informed me that this build will scale down as I progress, so I'm looking into going full phaser beams.
    Not really sure which direction to go in, so I just keep putting my nose down and grinding out missions. So far so good, anyway!

  • @UKSHARPSHOOTER78
    @UKSHARPSHOOTER78 Рік тому

    I'm not sure when it was released, but the Da vinci Miracle Worker escort is a pretty good ship.
    The trait is very good for beam overload builds.
    Energy overdrive
    Activating BO, FAW, or exceed rated limits will grant the following
    100% flight speed for 10 secs
    100% turn rate for 10 secs
    10%-50% All damage with energy weapons for 10 seconds
    The console isn't too bad either,
    Troyius protocol
    +28.5% outgoing hull healing
    -18.8% weapon power cost
    Check it out. I've just put it on my Beam overload build, so I'm gonna try it out

    • @Stu1701
      @Stu1701  Рік тому +1

      Yeah, the Da Vinci is a solid ship, in my opinion.

    • @UKSHARPSHOOTER78
      @UKSHARPSHOOTER78 Рік тому

      @Stu1701 To be fair, I only used the ship to get the trait and console. My favourite go-to ship is the inquiry. Having that trait and the console has really made a difference in damage out put and hull healing. I would definitely recommend it for beam overload builds

  • @eatatjoecs
    @eatatjoecs Рік тому +1

    Great list! Love how we can get ships from the C-Store that are better than many Lockbox ships. When I first started playing STO in 2012 the first ship I got was the T5 Tac-Ody. I liked it so much I ended up getting the Flagship T6 Mega bundle when it came out. However, as time passed it was drydocked as much better ships came out when specializations were created in the Delta-Expansion and it collected dust. Then... the Lexington came out, which is by far my favorite ship in the game. I can claim it on all my characters unlike the Inquiry, it comes with a Cmdr MW / Lt Intel, which is an amazing combo, it fits the poor man's DPRM (The Flagship Tac computer) which pairs so very well with the Eng Flagship console, you get a hanger and a lance weapon, you get the 13 consoles.... it's such a beast of a ship, and it's beautiful which makes it subjectively better than the VW MW Jug. With the traits ETM, Supercharged weapons, Emergency Weapons Cycle, Heart of Sol, Calm before the Storm, everything just fits together so perfectly when flying with 7 energy and a torp. Really love the Lexington. Then on top of it the new skin looks amazing.

  • @LMG1792
    @LMG1792 Рік тому +1

    The hydra is such a fun ship I wish it had a hanger considering its console and trait lol

  • @cotysalisbury861
    @cotysalisbury861 Рік тому

    The ship the Lexington heavy destroyer is a common ship of the 2380s all the way through the 4400s in Jonathan Dax's timeline.

  • @peterrichardson2337
    @peterrichardson2337 4 місяці тому

    Also Not the Mogai Thats t5 its the Morrigu t6. But ..the ship to have with EWC is the Legendary Valdore from the first strike bundle that can use the mogai and morrigu skins(included)

  • @thesageofgames1871
    @thesageofgames1871 Рік тому

    Is the fact that the Grissom annoys Kael the reason why that thing has been the forefront ship in the ESD shipyard since the time when we were eagerly awaiting the Iconian war to start?

    • @Stu1701
      @Stu1701  Рік тому

      I have no idea. All I know is that's Tumorboy's department.

  • @PDYork
    @PDYork Рік тому +1

    Lexington is bestington!!! If there is ONE ship that I would recommend people buy and if it was to be their only one, it's the Lexington. No matter how you play, it's a great freakin ship!!!!
    Now... I do take issue with claims of it being bad for forward facing energy weapons!!! But I understand why.
    For my build, I use the phaser torpedo on the front, along with the Disco wide-arc dual phaser, the agony phaser and reputation Terran phaser. Aft is loaded down with an elite fleet phaser, 360 player crafted phaser, 360 trilithium phaser and Disco rep torpedo. So basically I made my ship into a 6/3 or more realistically a 5/1.5, added some stuff for turn rate increase and can never go wrong with a Ragalia engine... no not the HIGHEST DPS of my fleet, but it is up there and can take a beating. The Lexington is just a fantastic ship and finally gives the Odyssey its proper flagship stats.

  • @erikhawkke4861
    @erikhawkke4861 Рік тому

    I think I discovered a little flaw with Entwined Tactical Matrices.. unless I'm mistaking it the proc version of FAW 1 locks out your ability to start FAW III till it wears off.. Yeah, I might be mistaking that, but it seems that would be hurting your overall damage output.

    • @Stu1701
      @Stu1701  Рік тому

      It does, but only because the FAW 1 is still active. Once it's over, then you should be able to use 3 (or whichever you have on your boff tray)

  • @nataschajordan6053
    @nataschajordan6053 Рік тому

    id also thought that maybe having the vanguard mechanic on some non jemmy ships would have been much nicer than adding single hangars everywhere with a very limited usefulness of MOST "classic" pets anyway.
    still hoping to get maybe some federation/rom/klingon vanguards mechanics - many vorchas were accompanied by brels actually, galaxy classes by runabouts and so on.

  • @nickhuber2985
    @nickhuber2985 Рік тому +1

    Was sad to see the Terran Trailblazer that recently became available on the C-Store not mentioned, it also makes a great SciTorp build.

    • @Stu1701
      @Stu1701  Рік тому +1

      I did consider it, but being a Command Science ship with a secondary MW seat, it's not great for actual science builds. For an EPG or Control build you really want Temporal or Intel. Trailblazer is good as a torp build thanks to the heavy tactical seating and 4/3 layout, but a cruiser or escort will always out perform it with the same build. The Trailblazer will just have a bit more options with the Sci abilities, but even then, the higher level seats will be taken up by the Command powers.
      Don't get me wrong, its a good ship, and definitely the best version of the Intrepid class in the game, but it falls a bit short without an Intel or Temporal seat.

    • @nickhuber2985
      @nickhuber2985 Рік тому

      @@Stu1701 Hey, thanks for the breakdown! Good info there, I appreciate it. ^.^

  • @erichmmiiiable
    @erichmmiiiable 10 місяців тому

    I feel that the MVAM or any kind of separation should have controls similar to the vanguard wingman

  • @SkrapMetal84
    @SkrapMetal84 Рік тому

    the oberth has one of the highest shield multipliers too not sure if that helps but yea.

  • @geminijustgemini7784
    @geminijustgemini7784 Рік тому

    My Science kitty loves the Fleet version of the Grissom.

  • @xell4701
    @xell4701 Рік тому +1

    I really wish the MVAM had got a overhaul similar to the wingman ability of jem’hadar ships

    • @mjrxero
      @mjrxero Рік тому +1

      If you use the MVAM from the Prometheus on the Hydra, using the Beta section makes it AMAZING for a beam boat.

    • @xell4701
      @xell4701 Рік тому

      @@mjrxero yeah but the MVAM itself is still really bad and needs an overhaul or buff

  • @m.f.cauley9729
    @m.f.cauley9729 Рік тому

    If I ever spend real money on STO again, I'll use your code. Thanks for the VID!

  • @Spamsmoothie1701
    @Spamsmoothie1701 Рік тому

    I'm not a fan of the torpedo builds and the play style of dealing with the mine launchers. However, the Eagle is nice because I don't really have to deal with that.

  • @agerothn
    @agerothn Рік тому

    Regarding the Clarke and Miranda/Centaur skins: I've actually discovered that with the right parts, you can make a ship with detached nacelles and pylons. Impromptu 32nd century.

  • @Telemachus2814
    @Telemachus2814 Рік тому

    I'm not sure where, I'm not sure what it would replace but I think the Suliban Carrier would be on my version of this list. For my style of play it's really great... plus it's a full carrier with 5/3 weapons _and_ a battle cloak. It's a better alternative to the Monitor in my opinion. Also I think it's time they update the T5 Odyssey set to let you have the Chevron separated AND the Aquarius deployed at the same time, I mean _really_ aside from the set bonus the inability to have both on at the same time just makes one of them basically useless.

    • @jongaskell3438
      @jongaskell3438 Рік тому +1

      Cardy intel flight deck too... intel seating, 5,3 with 2 hangers + you don't look like a Suliban brick

    • @Telemachus2814
      @Telemachus2814 Рік тому

      @Jon Gaskell but you have to look like an ugly Cardie Y or M instead.

    • @Stu1701
      @Stu1701  Рік тому +1

      The Silik was on last year's list. The Command seat on it means it's a solid torpedo boat, but I didn't include it this year because it's not full spec.

  • @andrewduchene1863
    @andrewduchene1863 Рік тому

    Are there any good c-store ships for tank builds
    I bought the narendra class and not sure if it’s a good platform for that build
    Any help would be greatly appreciated

    • @Stu1701
      @Stu1701  Рік тому

      pretty much any Command Cruiser is a good tank. I'd recommend the Clarke or the Buran. Lexington is decently tanky too thanks to it being a dreadnought.

    • @andrewduchene1863
      @andrewduchene1863 Рік тому

      Thanks for the help
      I’ve watched a lot of your videos, they’ve helped a lot in understanding and playing the game

  • @nunyabusiness9013
    @nunyabusiness9013 Рік тому

    Stu should wax his mustache into an old tymey one like Wang. It would really complete the look. Oh yeah and a monocle too. He definitely needs a monocle...

  • @jay-kg8ke
    @jay-kg8ke Рік тому

    I'd like to see an old school dominion battlecruiser. They use to have them in the ds9 lockbox I don't get why they're not in the store by now.

    • @Stu1701
      @Stu1701  Рік тому

      You're talking about the Jem'Hadar Light Battlecruiser. It's in the Infinity lockboxes and one of the Mudd's Market bundles.

  • @czechmate4235
    @czechmate4235 Рік тому

    Amazing video as always, Stu, but I have a question. I'm currently riding on the TNG wave, and I got inspired by your TNG build. I don't have the legendary Galaxy though. Is it still worth it to get the Cygnus & Sirius? I was planning to get them from the year long event.

    • @Stu1701
      @Stu1701  Рік тому +1

      Cygnus kinda bugs me because of its seating. With two lieutenant Tac seats a Lt.Cmdr. universal seat, it will always have either too much, or not enough Tac seating. However if you're wanting the normal Galaxy skin, it is still the second best option next to the World Razer. Sirius is a solid Torp boat or tank, if you're wanting the Galaxy dreadnought. I just wasn't impressed with it because there are already so many other ships like it already.

    • @czechmate4235
      @czechmate4235 Рік тому

      @@Stu1701 Thank you for the quick answer! You gave me something to think about.

  • @thesageofgames1871
    @thesageofgames1871 Рік тому

    The Gagarin's trait is also a beast for torpedo boats and when combined with the console for the Eagle on a full pilot ship and what you get is the ability to spam torpedo spreads like your torpedoes have Cannon Rapid Fire. Just set up your full torpedo build, have BFAW and CSV as abilities on your tac boffs and you can use those for free, no shared cooldown torpedo spreads.

  • @adamtobroxen3709
    @adamtobroxen3709 Рік тому

    With the hydra's trait, is the Linked Comand Matrix pet considered a frigate or saucer?

    • @Stu1701
      @Stu1701  Рік тому

      A saucer. Which makes no sense, but it gives the higher bonus.

    • @adamtobroxen3709
      @adamtobroxen3709 Рік тому

      @@Stu1701 It does come off the Jem Vangaurd Carrier. Last time I used it actually from that ship (when it launched), it did have a part of the ship detach from it separation style.

  • @thecrazzydutchman
    @thecrazzydutchman Рік тому

    soo cannon build wise its good to use the adamant heavy raider ? or is there any other ship that we can use ?

  • @wargodsix
    @wargodsix Рік тому

    Is the bajorian interceptor available as lockbox or such

  • @MysticTree44
    @MysticTree44 Рік тому

    I own all but 1 lol, just comes to show that these ships are really good!

  • @wargodsix
    @wargodsix Рік тому

    I. Not 💯 % sure yet but if I go c store Nobel and Sirius dreadnaught never been a fan of galaxy but Ross class made me a fan so tho there’s no Ross variant yet I’ve found a build I like least till they add the Ross

  • @michaelmccoy169
    @michaelmccoy169 Рік тому

    Is it possible for you to post a link to your builds?

    • @Stu1701
      @Stu1701  Рік тому

      check the channel's main page, I have whole playlists of builds.

  • @jamesjoyce3908
    @jamesjoyce3908 Рік тому

    Can you please tell me what ship would be great for a space wizard/anomaly build?
    It can be from the c store or one i could get for the yearly completion.

    • @Stu1701
      @Stu1701  Рік тому +1

      The Verne is still widely considered the best science ship in the game, it's a lockbox ship. The Grissom and Eternal are also nice options, they're from the C-store.

    • @jamesjoyce3908
      @jamesjoyce3908 Рік тому

      @@Stu1701 thank you for the reply. I will go for the Eternal.

  • @usmc4good
    @usmc4good Рік тому

    Genuine question…why does everyone call the in game store “c-store”? When the currency is “zen” and in-game its even called the “zen-store”…just wondering….

    • @Stu1701
      @Stu1701  Рік тому +1

      It's a carry-over from the early days of the game. STO's in-game store currency wasn't always Zen, it used to be Cryptic Points. This was way back when Atari was still the game's publisher. Eventually Atari dumbed Cryptic (because Atari didn't know how MMO's work) and Cryptic was later picked up by Perfect World Entertainment. This is when the in-game currency was changed from Cryptic Points to Zen.
      So C-Store is in reference to the store's original name and currency. You're right that is technically should be called Zen Store (or Z-Store) at this point, but most of us from those days of the game still call it C-store out of habit to the point that even players who weren't around in those days call it the C-Store too.

    • @usmc4good
      @usmc4good Рік тому

      @@Stu1701 ok, thank you,…

  • @furonguy42
    @furonguy42 Рік тому

    I've had the Gagarin since it came out and normally only used it for the trait and then left it, but recently I felt inclined to try and put a build together for it. I needed two fully maxxed-out Bellum RCS Accelerators to make it move the way I wanted, but I'm pretty pleased with it. (The lack of base maneuverability is a real shame too, because the lore Thomas Marrone wrote up for the Gagarin is that its supposed to be swift and maneuverable!)
    The Lexington isn't entirely my cup of tea, but the Multi-Directional Artillery Barrage console it comes with is a lot of fun and is a must-have for Quantum Torpedo canon/theme builds.

  • @Chaoskye
    @Chaoskye Рік тому

    been having a great time with the lexington, nearly completed the build from your lexington build video (needing that damn domino console) looks sweet with the lukari rep shield aswell
    question about entwined though: do i need both torpedo spread and faw skills to activate eachother? or can i just keep spread only and get a free faw?

  • @amarbosanac54
    @amarbosanac54 Рік тому

    Can anyone tell me like what’s the ship with the largest/biggest size playable in this game? Maybe Top 3 of the biggest ships would be great to know.

    • @Stu1701
      @Stu1701  Рік тому

      In total length, I think its the Durgath (KDF version of the Enterprise-J). I think the Herald Vonph is the tallest. The Borg Command Juggernaut and the Viridian Juggernaut are some of the largest in the game as well.

  • @paulomaggessi
    @paulomaggessi Рік тому

    What is the strongest ship in the federation?

  • @eloi110786
    @eloi110786 Рік тому

    What do you think Presidió class

    • @Stu1701
      @Stu1701  Рік тому

      Solid ship. That set of ships is a bit weird because they're classified as battleships, but are built more like dreadnoughts. Being full Command ships they're good for tank build or torpedo builds.

  • @bru1nzguy436
    @bru1nzguy436 Рік тому

    Entwined, it only works with torpedoes and fire at will (1) … can’t use 2or 3 ?

    • @Stu1701
      @Stu1701  Рік тому

      You can use any level or FaW and torp spread, but the trait will only give level 1 of these abilities.

  • @jeremydale4548
    @jeremydale4548 Рік тому +6

    The hydra is, in my opinion, the BEST tactical ship in the game. Period.

  • @wargodsix
    @wargodsix Рік тому

    I’m a printed ship collector so a discount code with gameprint be great I’ve already got my flag ship so really no need for zen myself anymore

  • @SolarWraith
    @SolarWraith Рік тому

    Love the Lex...tis a fine looking, and performing, ship.

  • @Joshbond.
    @Joshbond. Рік тому

    What about KDF ships? All I see are Federation/Mirror versions and its sad :(

  • @tenalpoen
    @tenalpoen Рік тому

    The only reason I would tell anyone to get the Eternal over the Grissom is that it's fleet grade out of the box. The Grissom isn't.

  • @tails-khoryanstar3099
    @tails-khoryanstar3099 Рік тому

    I don't know if it's because of your attitude of only wanting to play a Gemini darship with a Gemini character but I personally liked to. Be able to use the bug ship for any character. I wished and now developers have taken that away.😢😢

  • @Bubbajohn1500
    @Bubbajohn1500 Рік тому

    Didn't see my archon anywhere...

  • @wargodsix
    @wargodsix Рік тому

    I have the adamant I fly as one of my flags disappointed the 1 aft least give me a second aft it’s suppost to be terrans answer to defiant so it should be equal or better so lacking weapons is what kills it yea get experimental weapon and built in cloak but doesn’t make up for the lack of aft weapons

  • @Jay-ql4gp
    @Jay-ql4gp Рік тому

    I do love Emergency Power to Weapons. And the haste really helps Surgical Strikes. I have the Clarke, it's nice. If you put Centaur pylons on it you get a really cool but weird Conny look to it.

  • @sa80slayer85
    @sa80slayer85 Рік тому

    What does EPG mean?

    • @Stu1701
      @Stu1701  Рік тому +1

      Exotic Particle Generator. These are builds that focus on doing damage exotic abilities. Basically, the crazy space science magic builds.

    • @sa80slayer85
      @sa80slayer85 Рік тому

      @@Stu1701 gotcha 😂

  • @remirez2k3
    @remirez2k3 Рік тому

    so looks like hydra and eagle for me lol....i have MOST of this top ten already

  • @mem3732
    @mem3732 Рік тому

    It would be nice if MVAM had our weapons instead of the basics, maybe they could at least hit harder, it looks cool but damn are they dumb😂

  • @PhillipLemmon
    @PhillipLemmon Рік тому

    Love the channel, love the videos,
    But...
    I know what the Z-store is... But what is the C-store?
    Should have started with that in the video, you know for the new players.

    • @AzureGhidorah
      @AzureGhidorah Рік тому

      The C-Store and Z-Store are the same thing. The store where you buy things with Zen. They’re interchangeable.

    • @Stu1701
      @Stu1701  Рік тому

      Yeah, C-Store and Z-Store (or Zen store) are the same thing. C-store was the original name for it, back before Zen was a thing. Old habits die hard. You can often tell how long someone's been playing STO by weather they say C-store or Z-store lol.

  • @dhotnessmcawesome9747
    @dhotnessmcawesome9747 Рік тому

    Support.

  • @Vlad-e1i
    @Vlad-e1i Рік тому

  • @nicomuller4932
    @nicomuller4932 Рік тому

    😅 I guess i am first

  • @Sadarsa
    @Sadarsa Рік тому

    Pretty much all of these ships are are pew~pew or kaboom.. Not a single tank or space wizard build

    • @Stu1701
      @Stu1701  Рік тому

      My very first video was about tank builds

  • @QuantumNova
    @QuantumNova Рік тому

    Way too many federation ships in the game. Very boring! I guess STO does not understand the concept of 'Factions'. All sides should have UNIQUE massive C-store packs too, and not that lazy BS where they release a 9 pack but it's really just 3 ships for each faction. I hate that.

    • @Stu1701
      @Stu1701  Рік тому

      It's not that they don't understand them, its the fact that the majority of the player-base only plays Federation.

    • @mariotomic5664
      @mariotomic5664 11 місяців тому

      @@Stu1701 they bring dishonor to their house!!

  • @lordflashheart8153
    @lordflashheart8153 Рік тому

    I bought the Gagarin and it's pants, I'm assuming for it to good it needs full epic consoles, weapons etc which I haven't got yet, so for me atm it's garbage and doesn't survive a good onslaught from ads.

  • @MrMonkeyy5
    @MrMonkeyy5 Рік тому

    Where is the Titan science destroyer?🥲

    • @Stu1701
      @Stu1701  Рік тому

      On last year's top 10 list. The Titan isn't a bad ship, but it's not full spec and science destroyers are just a gimmick that with little practical use. The ability to swap between a science ship and an escort is completely useful mid-battle with the ability to change your loadout along with it. Then you're just flying an escort with a bunch of science gear and trait, which isn't going to help at all. It does make them a little more versatile as to what sort of build you can put on them, like you could put a tac focused loadout and a sci focused loadout on it, but if you're using a build that needs the tac focused loadout then you're going to have to remember to turn on tactical mode every time and if you die its going to be placed on a 30 second cooldown (which is annoying). And ever then the tactical mode will never be as good as an actual escort because it's still a science ship at heart (and in the master package), so there's no point in flying a science destroyer for purely tactical mode.
      Titan isn't a bad ship, and its certainly a very pretty ship, but Science Destroyers as a concept are pretty dumb.