Interesting review on this camera situation. I think when we're in a decision process, have multiple sources is great and check also creators that are actually using the prodcut and that paid for it is crucial too
Showing an ad on television is a waste as you are not reaching the target audience for your product. Regarding missing features in a review has to do with their personal use and how they find the feature important. What is right for you may be wrong for others. The issue is that Lumix is a small brand but as they focus a lot of video features in mirrorless they garner a small but loyal followers who made videos around Lumix. Many of this You Tubers said that they like their products and begin a channel before Lumix reached to them. One said that why hate us because we like the products. Your argumentation has a lot prejudice in it. If you go to a church then look around then everybody thinks like you and like the same good you like. That is wrong arguments. Hence you are not seeing the Lumix users. Get out of your bubble. That is the problem of a particular country like the USA on political level. Everyone lives in their bubble. Patrick Tomasso went to Sony for autofocus and invested heavily in their lenses and ecosystems. Hence he cannot switch anymore. Lumix users praise the inclusion of many video features in LOWER priced bodies. They said you get a lot for the money. Sorry for the caps locks but ai wanted to focus on the part of lower priced. Patrick Tomasso said the following of Lumix: - a lot of video features in lower priced bodies - vectoscope - shutter angle that Sony does not have - Open Gate in lower priced bodies - real 24p Cinema and not 23.97p like Sony. There are a lot of guys like CineD, Jordan Drake and Chris Nichols using Lumix cameras. Sony users on video side in mirrorless are more into run and gun stuff were AF is important. Where LUMIX is used with their mirrorless cameras are guys who are real beginning Cinematographers making narrative film with actors using manual focus. There are a saying in Spanish: Dime con quien andas te diré quien eres. This means say with who you are dealing then I say who you are. If you are only seeing Sony then you are doing wedding or that run and gun stuff. As a Lumix users said one time to me. I prefer going knitting that doing wedding stuff. He does only films with real actors so narrative filmmaking. This guys are looking for inspiration at Sam Mendes, Guillermo del Torro and Hoyte van Hoytema.
Interesting review on this camera situation. I think when we're in a decision process, have multiple sources is great and check also creators that are actually using the prodcut and that paid for it is crucial too
I think Phillip Bloom does a good job of honest review, and points out a lot of the negatives
Totally agree! Thanks for checking out the video!
Saw his video last night and thank you for making this today!! 🙏🙏.
Thanks for watching the video!! After seeing his video, I had too.. appreciate the comment! Enjoy your weekend!!
The word you're looking for is conflict of interest...
Exactly, thanks for checking out the video!
The reviewers have become like car salesmen, they will tell you about all the great things about the car but say nothing about the negatives.
Showing an ad on television is a waste as you are not reaching the target audience for your product.
Regarding missing features in a review has to do with their personal use and how they find the feature important. What is right for you may be wrong for others.
The issue is that Lumix is a small brand but as they focus a lot of video features in mirrorless they garner a small but loyal followers who made videos around Lumix. Many of this You Tubers said that they like their products and begin a channel before Lumix reached to them. One said that why hate us because we like the products.
Your argumentation has a lot prejudice in it.
If you go to a church then look around then everybody thinks like you and like the same good you like. That is wrong arguments. Hence you are not seeing the Lumix users. Get out of your bubble. That is the problem of a particular country like the USA on political level. Everyone lives in their bubble.
Patrick Tomasso went to Sony for autofocus and invested heavily in their lenses and ecosystems. Hence he cannot switch anymore.
Lumix users praise the inclusion of many video features in LOWER priced bodies. They said you get a lot for the money. Sorry for the caps locks but ai wanted to focus on the part of lower priced.
Patrick Tomasso said the following of Lumix:
- a lot of video features in lower priced bodies
- vectoscope
- shutter angle that Sony does not have
- Open Gate in lower priced bodies
- real 24p Cinema and not 23.97p like Sony.
There are a lot of guys like CineD, Jordan Drake and Chris Nichols using Lumix cameras.
Sony users on video side in mirrorless are more into run and gun stuff were AF is important. Where LUMIX is used with their mirrorless cameras are guys who are real beginning Cinematographers making narrative film with actors using manual focus.
There are a saying in Spanish:
Dime con quien andas te diré quien eres.
This means say with who you are dealing then I say who you are.
If you are only seeing Sony then you are doing wedding or that run and gun stuff.
As a Lumix users said one time to me. I prefer going knitting that doing wedding stuff. He does only films with real actors so narrative filmmaking. This guys are looking for inspiration at Sam Mendes, Guillermo del Torro and Hoyte van Hoytema.
Maybe.. but either way.. thanks for checking out video.. I’m appreciative of your opinion!
This is hilarious