Tu-144LL NASA 1996.
Вставка
- Опубліковано 15 гру 2009
- / savetu144group
Tupolev TU-144LL RA-77114 in flight
In July, 1983 this aircraft was designated as 101 and established 14 world records. These records were including a height of flight of 18,200 m with payload from 10 to 30 tons, average speed of 2,031.55 km/h on a closed circuit of 1,000 km and 2,012.26 km/h on a closed circuit of 2,000 km.
When the TU-144 program was cancelled, CCCP-77114 was used as research aircraft in experiments about the radiation in top layers of the atmosphere, ozone layer, thermal influence in different materials and studies on aerodynamics. In 1990 was placed in nonflyable storage.
In 1993 08-2 was chosen to serve as testbed in a joint program between Tupolev, NASA and others US firms. The aircraft suffered an extensive modification that included the power plant, former Koliesov RD-36-51A engines were replaced by Kuznetsov NK-321 (engines of the TU-160 bomber). The new model was designated TU-144LL Flying Laboratory. - Наука та технологія
It's truly amazing what the Russians are capable of building, using 50-60 year old, out dated technology. Unless I'm mistaken, the Soyuz spacecraft are still using vacuum tubes. (To be fair, the Russian vacuum tube is the most advanced vacuum tube ever developed, and their audio equipment is considered to be some of the finest on the planet.)
Hearsay.🤣
yeah, they use an out dated technologies quite frequently. It is simply too expensive for them to develop something new and they use paleogenic tech as efficiently as they can. Too dumb to inwent something usefull and innovative.
Why is it amazing? They literally copied Concorde's blueprints but had to do it on the cheap and quick - hence, everything about it was ropey and it wasn't fit for purpose, as history atests to.
@@stuartmiller7419 let me laugh in your face . 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Yes, the Svetlana vacuum tubes are highly prized by audiophiles the world over. Also, the 9-channel Kinopanorama sound system, the first to include a track for overhead speakers [half a century before Dolby Atmos], was superior to the 35mm magnetic systems used by Cinerama and CineMiracle.
Who wants to hear engines roar when you have a flute :D
Lovely, calming video, puts me in a very peaceful place. Thanks and cheers, Rich.
Очень жаль , что творение человеческой мысли так мало жило❤❤❤❤!!!!
Watching this whenever I need quiet time ,great video...
It would be nice to hear the engines instead of music dubbed in. I hate when UA-cam uploaders do this!
agree
at least they weren't total dumbasses and dubbed in something like Welcome to The Jungle
You realy want to hear the engines, not realy ?
There are plenty of videos that have the sound of the engines, others like this format, it is called variety.
Quad8track They said that the internal noise was so loud that passengers had to communicate with hand written notes.
Красавец!
Красавец и кучка идиотов предавших страну.
Красавец - самолет!
Обожаю Ту-144. А этот божественный цвет выхлопа двигателей НК-32-1. Недавно видел отчет - самолёт в прекрасном состоянии(внутри) но двигателей как не было,так и нет.
Куда двигателя дели и зачем сняли???
Я служил в Алма-Ате,когда проводились испытания этого самолета.Очннь прожерлив
А нам говорили, что это была эпоха застоя...
Так-то оно.Тяжелое но прекрасное время!
The music fits really well with the video
Glad to know that this Tu-144 is still flying.
an 147 Ummm, it stopped flying years ago, when NASA cancelled the flying lab project
@@dhtelevision Terminated, not cancelled.
Honestly I'm glad the TU144 had another flight. I'm not sure how much work went into getting a plane that had been sitting there since the early 1970s ready to fly, but hats off to NASA and Russia for doing it. There is no telling how much data was gathered just on that one flight, good or bad.
This is NASA's TU-144, it's still used for research. this is an active service aircraft and there's no plans to retire it. NASA bought it as an incomplete hull and finished building it with updated components and better engines. this is as close to an American SST as we get.
Unlike the original, NASA's TU-144 is capable of supercruise.
@@Jack29151 The TU-144LL has been retired for 23 year's. 🤔 "Air-ca-drraft not economically vi-uh-bull" was the determination.
@@charlesdjones1 Retired is another way of saying used for research. NASA never just parks anything. Even the space shuttles still make money and one is still used for research.
@@Jack29151 last flight 23 years ago isn't the same as being in "active service".. You might as well say the two YF-23's are still active since they also went to NASA, and let's just throw in the P-51 since it flew as recently as 1945, lol.
Hora da modernização sem paraquedas e pistas curtas.
Aaah, the DeLorean of airplanes
Yeah, or like a Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR, while the Concorde is a McLaren F1
I've always thought it looks like a slightly sad dragon from a cartoon or something.
1:03 Look at its big eyes (windows) and its droopy ears.
SammyBadger omg so truw
a dragon or a phoenix
So when they raised the nose, did the pilots still have a frontal view?
@@dugroz it was only lowered for landing and tackoff.
@@dugroz there was no need for frontal view, coz it was totally autopilot!
I like how the music make it seems like it's the most graceful plane ever. when it's quite the opposite.
it's so bad!!! that Nasa along with Boeing MD/Douglas and Rockwell bought this one to study it , lmao less accidents than the 737max
Fewer deaths to its credit than the French try at supersonic flight. Far fewer.
@@flyingtigerlineSorry but you were saying about the french?
The Tupolev crash was pilot error / structural failure of aircraft.
The Concorde crash was fod with lethal consequences.
@bulletproof2353 1999. with NASA, 1978. with Aeroflot
Really very good! Fantastic video!
I do not think the TU-144 was superior to Concorde.
although the TU-144 looks very nice, it was rushed into production and featured severe and careless errors in the design of systems and the airframe structure. The aircon system was so loud that passengers had to write to each other, it was even more thirsty than Concorde (afterburners were switched on always in the TU-144 I think) and it featured somewhat primitive stopping/braking mechanisms compared to the carbon ceramic brake set up of Concorde. The computer controlled air intake was also more sophisticated on Concorde. One could however say that the TU-144 (with canards) was more aerodynamically accomplished at slower speeds than it's anglo/french rival. The TU-144 was remarkably unreliable, and although Concorde had evident safety issues of it's own, it was the better plane in terms of usability, reliability and engineering sophistication. Looks wise, they both have their own unique qualities that sets them apart.
Concorde211 Of course you think so. You are Concorde's fan, that's it
Concorde didn't have 'evident safety issues of its own' at all. And the canards were there to supplement the wings because they were poorly designed and performed badly at low speeds, that's why canards are there. And even then it still had a higher landing speed. Concorde was far more aerodynamically accomplished believe me.
You are correct. The Russians had neither the engineering capability nor the money available to spend and as a result were forced to improvise on the entire wing design, as well as many other concorde features simply being engineered around and not even attempted to replicate.
TU-144 = one plane I'd never want to fly on.
Still better than the yank SST!
Bloody ugly too
ah finnaly I found this video I've been watching this always
Beautiful plane
Mate, that was brilliant!
Majestuoso avión.
Excellent video
Such a cheerful aircraft, love it😊
@northernstudio Cannards are been deployed at the takeoff speed of 450 km h not over, and on landing below the speed of 450km h,landing gear is lowered because this was a test flight.
Stunning plane!
Lindo! Lindo! Lindo!!!
What a beautiful plane!
Aircraft is great as background sound! Love Russia!🇷🇺🇮🇳
Bonito Avion,bonita musica.
The music is simply magical.
wonderful airplane Eurofighter comercial
TUPOLEV - there's no better way to fly.... 👋😍😍😍👍
What is cool about this plane is its story and decadence. I find it very nice but, just think the opposite way: what would had happened if we were used to watch the 144 crossing the skies for about three decades instead of the Concorde?? Maybe some of us would write romantic opinions about the French/Brit joint, arguing against russian sst supremacy...but it's just my opinion. I love decadence, so I love Tu144!!!
Clueless comment.🤣
những cỗ máy chạy bằng nhien liệu, với trần bay và quãng đường dài, ko có gì cản ỷở nó quay trở lại bầu trời!39 năm ngủ vùi là một quãng thời gian quá dài rồi!!!
The most beautiful airplane in the world. I love his doggy-ears! Nobody has it!
SuperSuperka ,there where extreme loud cracking sounds inside the plane when used
@@touraneindanke obviously, they created a lot of drag. They're known as canards, and they were used to make the plane more maneuverable during takeoff and landing. It could then fold the canards in flight, reducing drag.
Awesome !!
The front conards make it look like the XB-70
XB-70 literally gave birth to the Concord and TU-144.. Obviously the USSR was going to rip off anything the U.S.A was doing at that time or afterwards anyway.
But smaller.
where you get the picture Tupolew-144LL?
@northernstudio
"doggy-ears" - cute LOL
@beeroosterm If, as you incorrectly state, the Tu-144 was '... a gigantic pile of garbage', why then was it, rather than Concorde, chosen in 1993 as a supersonic flying lab?
Journalist make stupid ideological comments, and don't know what they are talking about.
So yo mama could hatch an egg in supersonic flight
@@internetcensure5849 He did not. It's you making stupid comments.
@@MrJakeMallard What rubbish! Get a life.
Sadly very true. 75% of flights were cancelled... But, it is still a badass plane. Better than the PC shit we have today.
Such a jurassic comment, but still. I think the "PC shit" is far better than the planes from 70s in terms of economy and comfort. You know, they're all nice in FSX
I hate the pc aircraft
what's the name of the music, THX!
It's partly true, because today Design Bureaus or OKB-X and production plants are subsidiaries United Aircraft Corporation, so they have mutual management.
Bro's entire channel is only about that plane 💀
Wonderfull. beautifull looks like a saluki dog. Full of grace.
Later on, they changed the design to have countermeasures come out of the back
A legszebb repülőgép ami valaha a levegőbe emelkedett :D
Tu-144 is the best SST! THX for the video! ;)
Modellpecs Well it isn't.
Are you for real?
What a moron
🤣
The Tu-144 kinda looks like a less luxurious, cargo Virsion of the concord
I'm sorry my friend but I think you forget that it was built in the country of international proletariat... Obviously it can't be bourgeois
Well, it was not built to be luxurious, and some of these were cargo aircraft. So you are partially right.
¡Que belleza de avion supersonico! Se asemeja a un cisne, que lástima por lo de su accidente en la exposición , hubiera sido magnifico los vuelos supersonicos económicos.
Económicos no.
nice looking plane but was loaded whit mechanical issue and the noise inside was horrible
make airliners, not bombers ;D
Best comment
No make both
@@cancelanime1507 ua-cam.com/video/lITBGjNEp08/v-deo.html
Just think those engines are so loud they had to play music just so you wouldn’t ask why is this thing so loud
Poor thing. The music makes it look so sad.
Aka Nasa's first foren aircraft
The concorde with the ears
:-)BEAUTIFUL RUSSIAN BIRD:-)
:-)BEAUTIFUL RUSSIAN BIRD(-:
Beautiful music, superbly appropriate! who the composer please?. I can see why some other posters would want to hear the engines, as would I, Lovely Video!!!!
I know this plane well.
Loud, dirty exhaust, sonic boom, risky bird and a no-profit machine. Glade USA bailed out, no airline could survive the maintenance cost. Like the next guy, I would have like to fly in it. It would take an advanced engine technology to get this back on the drawing board. It has got to make money!
I agree. Flying is complicated enough as it is below 600mph. I do still believe that future technology will allow for more safe and a cost effective means to have commercial flights above the speed of sound, but I honestly don't think we are even close to being there, not even in 2022. At the end of the day, these larger companies tend to throttle progress all in the name of profit, but that's just me.
There was the one reason only the USSR could to produce the supersonic bomber...nothing more.This time in 1973-76 the Soviets started the programm of the Energia-Buran;Tu-160;Jak-35;Mig29,Su27; Tu154;Il62 ...and athers .in 1966-1973 was continued preparations to the moon flights with the N1 as the boosters series.
N1 engines were bought by the USA to be used in its own rockets.
What is that music ?
Concordski !!!
@Ivan Banochkin ма что сказал
And here we see the wild Concordski going about its mating dance
Btw just wondering could any of the flaws be fixed on the tu-144
It did not have any real flaws, but it could be improved using modern technology. By the way, the engines in this thing broke the world record for thrust with afterburners engaged, at 40 tons! (iirc)
the only real flaw were the engines. and yes, they actually did replace them.
@@theflotheflo with the tu-160 engines of I remember correctly
@@abk2k3aaronkauflin83 Not Tu-160 engines, but later Tu-144s shared the same engines.
Makes the concorde look like a child's plaything.
🤣
как будто эротику какую-то посмотрел
is good.
My impression of Tu-144 engines: RAWRAWRRRREWARR (inaudible) REWAEAEARWEWER (inaudible) (inaudbile)
She hasn't tucked her wheels in
@SPAMPolice1 Day since the supersonic aircraft no longer fly the day when the air force stepped back
I want a new Version of the Tu- 144 with all its flaws fixed
No "flaws" per se, as Tu-144 was certified for flight. Concorde had many "flaws" too.
в музыке неба была другая композиция
Who's a good boi?
@briatore78 With that bitchy economy troubles all over the world we have a little chance to fly over the sound speed in a near future.
jedine lietadlo ktore dokazalo konkurovat Concordu :D
Quad8track is correct!!! SOUND PLEASE
The Tu144 was superior to Concord on many aspects, hence NASA's choice to use it as a research platform.
Zorro Alphonso
I must ask.....what, apart from being a little faster? And a little bigger? But that's about it
My guess is that NASA paid a lot less for the TU-144 than a Concord.
Good answer.......you bet ya
Cock Womble😂😂😂😂
the 144 really wasnt a bad plane it was rushed but the d model had some advantage over Concorde they both had plus and minuses
name 1 REAL WORLD advantage the 'Toop had over Concorde. Carrying an extra fifty passengers to Almaty? Whoop dee doo. and don't tell me it was faster. that really doesn't matter.
So having a far greater passenger capacity and being faster is no "real world" advantage to you? I wonder what your "world" is like, and what you call "real"! As for the Alma-Ata bit, well, I´m sure Concorfdsky would gladly fly to New York if the jealous, mean yanks gave their permission....
You have absolutely no idea what real- world advantages are, don't you? Carry more pax for flights that weren't even half-hull with per-pax ticket price at the same level as any other sub-sonic jetliner? Flying faster but gulping enormous amount of fuel? In short, Konkordski failed hard. The amount of its advantage is prevailed by countless disadvantages.
you should just fly a cssena or somthing then
Name please all the advantage, educate me please.
Some of them i know, it wass never cold inside and you did not speak, more of them please .
он шасси может складывать?или как?
А как иначе? Это же испытательный полет!
Did the TU-144 FLY thousands of passengers across the Atlantic? Enough said. Going with mart fart on this one. Respect.
Russian has the TU-160 blackjack similar to a Concorde plane and nearly 30 of them are still flying many hours without accidents!...so if Russia has been able to build the Tu-160 based in Tu-144..it to say that Russia can build a supersonic passanger jet...the problem was that a fly ticket was too expensive even for western people who had to pay 12.000 euros to Fly from London to new York in concorde...imagine russian people paying that amount of money in rubble to Fly Moscow vs new york!
Manuel Flores Escobar Your reply has to be commended Manuel. Thanks.
There are less than 25% of 144 in 160 .
Yes, at first we tryed to use 144 as a bomber but it was a very bad idea... But, the engines of 160 are really based at engines of 144.
And engines of 144 were based at engines of some 1950-1960 bomber that not flyed.
PEACE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Wow. I did not know this. Cheers.
actually the T-160 is based on the Tu-22. Of course any leason learned from Tu-144 was implemented onto the other planes, but they werent similar designs at all.
Tu-144 was based on the prior Tu-135 project, inteded to compete with the american XB-70. But when missile technology made both planes irrelevant, the Tu-135 project was abandoned. The latest iteration of that project, was basically a Tu-144 without the passenger cabin.
Techniquement ce n'est pas une copie du Concorde, même s'il y a ressemblence:-)
No the Tu-144 came before the Concorde was ever developed
Why did NASA choose this thing over the Concorde? I am not against this tupolev plane but I thought concorde is safer than this
NASA knew better than you, that's why. "Safety" was not the issue, but performance was. Tu-144 was faster and heavier than the "Concorde", which ended up in flames.🤣
*In Soviet Union Plane dose Ballet*
When you see it from a quartering away angle at 0:37, it resembles a giant white catfish. And this was in no way superior to Concorde. No supercruise. Fundamentally wrong double delta wings. Poor low speed stability (lack of ogival delta vortices). Deafening noise. Poor range. Constant in flight systems failures. Terrible structural engineering. Ceiling panels that fell off. And all that money wasted just to fly once a week from Moscow at Almaty (wherever the hell that is).
There is only two sst and only tupolev with rd36 can go supersonic without afterburner
TU-144, die "schönere" Concorde 😉
Its gopnik
Name of the Music?? ❤️
The music is annoying 😡
Soundtrack named ?
Beatiful plane, too bad it could not compete with the Real Concorde, but it's realy Beatiful flying airplane too !!!
It never intended to "compete" with "Concorde".
нет, на американцев пинять тут бесполезно. это понятно, что любая империя (начиная от римской) будет стремиться к мировому господству, и не важно, российская она или еще какая. если бы у наших конкурентов было что-то подобное и оно попало бы нам в руки, мы бы тоже все кабеля и проводку перерезали бы на хер. без возможности восстановления. вопрос тут вот в чем. когда умные люди решали вопрос о передаче этой машины американцам в аренду, неужели они не подозревали о том, что конкуренты смогут её окончательно испортить? Да конечно можно было бы составить такой договор, чтобы сохранить эту машину без пагубного вмешательства и т. д... и тут еще много чего можно написать, но смысла в этом нет...
Короче, это памятник погибшему патриотизму, ибо не возможно защищать и воспевать то, что уже продали...
Музыка в этом видео неуместна ...ну
NASA?
ohmusicsweetmusic NASA bought a Туполев Ту 144
www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/history/pastprojects/TU-144/index.html
nasa??
Pilotado por pilotos da "Nasa"
nasa already had a tupolev tu144, if i'm not mistaken it was used for high speed tests
Shame because they need this in Russia to cover the huge distances, maybe Putin will bring it back!
Mathew,this aircraft is performing its duties as flying lab at the present time. The supersonic project did not buried and maybe you will watch the supersonic aircrafts in a future))) .With respects from Russia.
Звук не в тему конечно.