As an Indian, I have an incident to share. Something similar had happened earlier during the Nottingham Test in 2011 between India & England. Just before the Tea break, Ian Bell hit the last ball of the over for a boundary and assumed the ball has gone for four and walked out of his crease. The ball wasn't dead and it was collected and thrown back at stumps and Dhoni took off the bails while Bell was standing in the middle of the pitch chatting with his mate and wondering what just happened. The decision was given out by the umpires and the English crowd started to boo India for spirit of the cricket as if it was India's fault. Post the break, Dhoni withdrew his appeal on being advised by Sachin and Bell was recalled. The English crowd cheered and the English Media applauded India for maintaining the spirit of the cricket. Bell made 150+ runs and India lost that test match. Dhoni was bestowed with the spirit of the cricket award by ICC a decade later but what's the point of that. Spirit of the game shouldn't be prioritized over the laws of the game if it involves the recklessness of the players as it takes away the competitiveness. The players are professional and they should be aware of what they are doing. Well done to Australia for maintaining their stance.
If the Carey did a misfield they might have sneaked a single as well right? Would that be called 'not good sportsmanship' if they sneaked a single? Absolutely not
Because at that time, the ball wasn't successfully collected by the keeper. It's called a Bye. A situation where the batter fails to make contact with the ball, and the keeper fails to collect it. In this situation, the ball was collected successfully and Bairstow wasn't taking a single or any kind of advantage. If Bairstow was already outside the crease, or they were planning to take a run, then keeper has full rights to take action.
I am not supporting any teams. But this means of wicket is not ideal to me. If we start considering taking such kind of wickets, the game will go on much longer like the way Stuart was acting.
Yes the law is clear, the ball is considered dead when it's in the hands of the wicket keeper... Weak umpiring. Imagine being English and defending this nonsense or an Aussie celebrating this desperately cheap behaviour, not that surprising I guess 😂
@@Profanity1@Profanity1 if you watch the keeper threw the ball as soon as he got it, Bairstow went on walkabout without looking, his own fault. Your saying its dead as soon as it hits the wicketkeeper s hand. So what if the batsman decided to run, keeper had every right to throw, its dead when the umpire says over and when the keeper passes the bowl to another teammate and the bowler heads back to his bowling position.
@joedont9307 Instead of misquoting me and claiming I'm lying, why don't you look up the rules yourself? The ball is considered dead when it rests in the WK hands. I didn't say touch?
Whatever Skull says is instantly forgettable.. the guy talks non stop and its usually just nonsense. Bring back commentators who know that sometimes silence is sometimes better than endless gobbery.
As a Brit at the time I wasn’t too happy but looking back on it now it’s very funny. Seeing the old boys loose their dignity is always amusing. Good entertainment regardless of the outcome.
Yeah but Broad did call him a disgrace. He's not -won ODI world cup - won WTC - lead Aus to a stunning victory in the first Ashes test - captained sunrisers Hyderabad to the grand final -an almost unbeaten home summer -3 5 wicket hauls in a row The list goes on This man is unstoppable and NOT a disgrace.
Well well well... England won world cup 2019 by the rule book.otherwise everyone know who is real lifter of cup... and now crowd crying....shut up mate
I think England winning the World Cup was completely fair and I think what the Aussies did is completely fair as well. It's extremely hypocritical of English fans to celebrate winning a World Cup because of the laws while hating on the Aussies for taking a wicket using the laws.
Broad will also be remembered for not walking off when clearly nicking the ball. English cricket team falls back on the spirit of the game only when it suits them!
NO. Completely different - because For me, walking or not walking is no longer a "Spirit of Cricket" issue since the introduction of DRS reviews. Broad didn't walk - but the Aussies had used up their reviews. Use of reviews are part of the game now, so not walking because you've burned your reviews is no longer a spirit of cricket issue. Prior to DRS - yes - I might agree, but after DRS - Sorry, using your reviews sensibly is part and parcel of the game. You are supposed to use reviews for umpire "howlers" - but instead, teams routinely use DRS reviews to gain an advantage on marginal decisions. That's fine - but if you do that, you surrender your right to call howlers a "Spirit of Cricket" issue.
@@Quincycle No. Not obliged. Which is exactly why it's a Spirit of Cricket issue. The whole point is it's about being within the law, but not within the spirit. The issue here is that the wicket came about through a confusion about whether the ball was dead. Cricket, in order to be playable, requires the two teams to be sensible about agreeing when the ball is dead, otherwise the game would turn into a farce of double bluffs every single ball about whether the ball is dead. It's part of the Spirit of Cricket, "Gentleman's agreement" To be sporting about the issue of dead ball, precisely so that play can continue in a smooth manner. Otherwise you literally have the stupid pantomime that Broad demonstrated when he came out after Bairstow - of checking every single ball whether the ball was dead or not. IT looked comical - but he was making a serious point - if teams start exploiting doubt over when the ball is dead to take wickets as a matter of routine, the game would descend into chaos.
it's not cheating but that doens't mean it isn't a cunt thing to do. Batsmen walk out of the crease after deliveries all the time, but if you're that desperate for an ashes win to resort to that then it speaks more about their character than anything else
Tbf, they have effectively replaced AUS fans as the most toxic in the world these days. Or even the on field players. I remember someone threw a bottle cap at KL Rahul a couple of years back.
@@cdn4767 Really? I know 2 Australians who have been physically assaulted by Indian men in Indian stadiums. There are a lot of words said by English crowds, but they don't start punching someone else because they support the other team and have a different skin colour.
Bairstows dumb look on his face when he realises the Aussie got him out with the same tactic he had been trying a few times in the tests prior to this one was priceless. Not sure why he hung around hoping to be given not out as he is well aware of the rule
Yeah but it isn’t in the spirit of the game to stump someone who didn’t go out of his crease until when he thought the ball was dead. They weren’t trying to stump him for coming out of his crease while facing the ball so it is undoubtedly against the spirit of the game and the appeal should have been withdrawn. M
@@joebowden4065 was he the umpire? Only the umpire can call over and declare the ball dead. Just like with mankading it only happens when certain players go out of their crease over and over again. As we've seen in this video, he was going out of his crease multiple times so the Aussies had every right to do what they did.
So, If bairstow would have casually reached the other end while fist bumping stokes in the middle without anyone noticing, would the umpires have given a single ?
@@UmpireStrikesBack that's what I meant. In retrospect, it would have been a change of strike. But If england would have appealed that hey that was a casual single, would the umpires had given it so?
@@ShubhamSharma-mb4og buddy batters don't change the strike the fielding team does. And if they are casually walking and ball has stoped the movement then it is declared dead and run can't be run after thay
The fact Bairstow tried the exact same thing to Marnus earlier on in the test makes his reaction all the more pathetic. Only against 'the spirit of the game' when it's going against you apparently.
Fully Bairstows fault. You can shout all day about cheating etc but that was within the rules of a game AND Johnny is a bloody keeper too! From an Englishman.
Ball hit bat then went for 4 so there was nothing Stokes or the umpires could do about it. If they ran for the overthrow THEN and only then could you say any thing.
@@grogu1986 he seems like he has poor sportsmanship like the rest of the english team (and the fans). I don't like Aussies much but this wasn't even remotely close to cheating. It's just english fans being butthurt, which is nothing new 😂
Even as an Englishman just get over it already. Old enough and wise enough to not leave your crease. I would have done the exact same as captain. Weather cost us a 3-2 win of the series. But Johnny also cost us that day! It is what it is.
Poor selection cost you the series. If you didn't have such idiotic selectors choosing Bairstow (an incompetent keeper who dropped multiple catches in the first game, whilst also scoring no runs) and Moeen (who had so many runs scored against him in the first game), England would have won both of the initial games of the series. There might have even been even a whitewash!
This really should not have been as controversial as it was...Carey threw the ball immediately, it's on Bairstow for not checking where the ball was and for leaving the crease before the over had been called.
Broad said to cummins that u would be always remember for that Well guess what Pat cummins will always be remember as a World Cup + WTC + ASHES winning captain in a same year!!! And wlil go down as one of the best captains not like the boundary count winners or so xD
wait a minute the world cup win due to 'boundary count' was actually legal, until the rule was changed in November 2019, which was after the world cup, so I don't see the problem with being world cup boundary count winners...
Pretending that drawing the ashes is somehow the same as winning them, while also pretending that England somehow weren't worthy world cup winners despite winning it completely within the rules, speaks volumes about your bias my friend
As a kiwi who has always rooted against the Aussie cricketers for their excessive arrogance and sledging, this made me actually root for them because of the way Cummins handled himself, and the way the hypocritical Pom’s and their media reacted.
Aussies definitely right in this case, so get on with it Poms. As a NZer, you very much got the rub of the rub of the rub of the green in that 2019 WC final too..
I felt for Johny the way he was shocked by what had happened. . . He had no clue. . . That is why awareness of the surrounding especially in cricket is so crucial! 😢
Brilliant awareness by the Aussies. Yes - many people will say that Bairstow had no intention of making a run but the same could be said when a batsman get stumped by slightly raising his foot off the crease. It is out all every day.
Instead admitting Bairstow was wrong, both captain Ben stokes and coach Brendan McCullum double down saying it wasn't in the "spirit of cricket" and they wouldn't follow through with such tactics ... both have participated in such action many times in the past, demonstrating absolutely hypocrisy. With also saw Starc catch in same game overturned the ball was "grounded" b/c starc used to ball to break his fall thus a safety issue. Both times the letter of the law was used. Australia moved on ... unfortunately England did not. History will remember that England play in the "spirit of the game" only when it benefits themselves
Any englishman going to complain, bear in mind that england had ALREADY tried to do the same thing to marnus labuschagne in the first innings (or at least previously, like when aus was batting). Ironically it was the man himself Johnny Bairstow who attempted to do it. In true English spirit he missed the wicket by miles but even if he had hit it, Marny put his bat in his crease until he knew he was clear to leave it.
The background music when all ausies were plotting the run out made me feel like hunter is spying out on his prey. and the fact that all aussies were aware about biarstow moving out of screeze shows their match awareness.
The larger louts have no idea of the rules of the game! This surely was the low point of Lords. The behaviour in the Long Room was appalling and may lead to teams entering the oval by means other than the long room and that would be a pity! The rules of the game are ABSOLUTELY clear!
according to the rules, " After six deliveries the umpire calls 'over'; the fielding team switches ends, and a different bowler is selected to bowl from the opposite end." the aussies asked the umpire and he said he had not said over. Please tell me how its cheating is they followed the rules of the game. thanks Bairstow for the endless fails
I feel for Australia here that was the rules Bairstow was out for walking out of his crease before the umpire saying over it was absolutely disgraceful and ridiculous from the English fans
@Profanity1 Internet is free Bairstow was reminded after the incident that on day three of the Lord’s Test, Bairstow attempted to stump Marnus Labuschagne in the exact same fashion in which he was dismissed two days later. Nice try mate but next time you want to seem smart, stop, check what you writing and then don't write anything. It's better to be a silent fool than to give voice and have it confirmed.
@@Peter-e8y If you can't understand the difference between a batsman batting out of his crease and therefore trying to gain an advantage compared to a batsman thinking the ball is dead and walking out of his crease to the middle after the over then you're not very intelligent at all..
@Profanity1 and if you can't watch the video of Bairstow and Labushagne on day 3 then your as blind as you are stupid. It's okay, go play with your Lego. Adults are talking
A handful of cricketers are known for walking before the umpire raises the finger. Johnny Bairstow will go down in history as the only player who walks before he has even been dismissed.
Simply clever cricket by the Australians. Sorry, Poms. This is just good match awareness. The Aussies saw a weakness and they targeted that weakness. It's not backyard cricket here, guys!
As an Aussie watching this live and all the follow up I said then and still say now.. FAVOURITE ASHES MOMENT EVER!!! Sums up everything that the Ashes is and has come from.. Those damn colonials facing up to the mother country on their home turf and winning.. how dare they! Whinging Poms cheeky Aussies f**king love it! First ever ashes to now
Ye, it's the Ashes. It's always gonna be a bit dirty from time to time. Bodyline is another example, but it's still not great if a team resorts to that sort of thing to win a game.
They wrote the rules they know! Everyone cricketer knows to stay in their crease! It is basically a stumping. The umpire hasn’t called dead ball as well like!?!? Stay in your crease, no excuses!
Broad: that's what you are gonna be remembered for Boy what happened during 2013 ashes did you forgot that you nicked the ball to first slip not even the keeper and still stood your ground, ashamed that post that you played this long for England and became a legend and English crowd same old Aussie's always cheating hell if your team is that gentlemen why didn't they showed sportsman spirit when ball went to the boundary after ricocheting through Stokes bat, most pathetic crowd the world Has in any sport
Because both of those things (all 3 of those things) required an umpires decision, which was abided by. The only one to have the grace to be sheepish about it was Stokes, who apologised, but the Kiwis have always been popular over here. As for most 'pathetic crowd', to what are you referring, as Australians adore going to England for the Ashes as the atmospheres are unique in world cricket.
bairstows a goose and has thrown stumps down before in county matches when the batsman has walked out of his crease. and england did get a brand new cherry made of granite saving them from defeat a few tests later, no need to cry lol
AS an Indian, that is out, clearly. "Spirit of Cricket" is an argument used by the English only when it favours them. All Stuart Broad will be remembered for will be playing 2nd fiddle to Jimmy Anderson.
Cummins had the option to withdraw the appeal. Bairstow had the option to ensure the ball was dead before going strolling for no good reason after every ball. Which came first?
As an Indian, I have an incident to share. Something similar had happened earlier during the Nottingham Test in 2011 between India & England. Just before the Tea break, Ian Bell hit the last ball of the over for a boundary and assumed the ball has gone for four and walked out of his crease. The ball wasn't dead and it was collected and thrown back at stumps and Dhoni took off the bails while Bell was standing in the middle of the pitch chatting with his mate and wondering what just happened. The decision was given out by the umpires and the English crowd started to boo India for spirit of the cricket as if it was India's fault. Post the break, Dhoni withdrew his appeal on being advised by Sachin and Bell was recalled. The English crowd cheered and the English Media applauded India for maintaining the spirit of the cricket. Bell made 150+ runs and India lost that test match. Dhoni was bestowed with the spirit of the cricket award by ICC a decade later but what's the point of that.
Spirit of the game shouldn't be prioritized over the laws of the game if it involves the recklessness of the players as it takes away the competitiveness. The players are professional and they should be aware of what they are doing. Well done to Australia for maintaining their stance.
exactly....Bairstow had tried it in previous tests and succeeded ...he would never recall the decision in his favour...such a whinging Fanta Pance
That was the day Dhoni died to me. If the umpire had signalled four, different story. Play the whistle, England. And dry your eyes.
Bro write a novel
Spirit of yap award😂
lol ur so dumb
As a Brit. That was 100% out. Problem with this country write the rules but want everything to be done like gentlemans
And Bairstow himself had attempted the exact same dismissal dozens of times in his career.
When the rules are on your side, cite the rules. When the rules are against you, cite the Spirit of the Game.
You can't be a brit and say "gentlemans" at the same time 😭😭
@aayushbh919 why?
spot on mate
If the Carey did a misfield they might have sneaked a single as well right? Would that be called 'not good sportsmanship' if they sneaked a single? Absolutely not
Because at that time, the ball wasn't successfully collected by the keeper. It's called a Bye. A situation where the batter fails to make contact with the ball, and the keeper fails to collect it.
In this situation, the ball was collected successfully and Bairstow wasn't taking a single or any kind of advantage.
If Bairstow was already outside the crease, or they were planning to take a run, then keeper has full rights to take action.
I am not supporting any teams. But this means of wicket is not ideal to me. If we start considering taking such kind of wickets, the game will go on much longer like the way Stuart was acting.
@@RandomGuy-bx1cdno need to write a whole explanation to kids who don’t know anything about cricket
Who Won? 😏😒
😂🤣😂Marcus Harris!! “You wrote the rules you flippen idiot..😂🤣😂 not our fault..”!!! Stray-Yah!!
Englashman here, no complaints at all, clearly out the only one to blame was bairstow, the law is completely clear
Exactly, I don't get why this is such a foreign concept to some people 🤣
Yes the law is clear, the ball is considered dead when it's in the hands of the wicket keeper... Weak umpiring. Imagine being English and defending this nonsense or an Aussie celebrating this desperately cheap behaviour, not that surprising I guess 😂
@@Profanity1@Profanity1 if you watch the keeper threw the ball as soon as he got it, Bairstow went on walkabout without looking, his own fault. Your saying its dead as soon as it hits the wicketkeeper s hand. So what if the batsman decided to run, keeper had every right to throw, its dead when the umpire says over and when the keeper passes the bowl to another teammate and the bowler heads back to his bowling position.
He isn’t an Englishman, he can’t even spell it! 😂
@joedont9307 Instead of misquoting me and claiming I'm lying, why don't you look up the rules yourself? The ball is considered dead when it rests in the WK hands. I didn't say touch?
As Skull said You treat the crease like Juliane Assange treated the Ecuadorian Embassy. You just don't get out.
This is a banger of a line lol
Whatever Skull says is instantly forgettable.. the guy talks non stop and its usually just nonsense. Bring back commentators who know that sometimes silence is sometimes better than endless gobbery.
Please explain the reference
@@YorkshireinManilaJesus Christ, lighten up, mate. Where did he hurt you?
@@scsutton1timely reply mate…only 3 month late..still better late than never,..oh wait, maybe never would be worked too…
As a Brit at the time I wasn’t too happy but looking back on it now it’s very funny. Seeing the old boys loose their dignity is always amusing. Good entertainment regardless of the outcome.
Fr
Well that's why we don't win. They don't think twice about being arseholes, you feel all bad about it
you're not a Brit anymore?
When someone starts his/her comment with "As a brit/Aussie/Italian" or whatever, it sounds so Indian.
Reminds me of the Ian Bell - MS dhoni incident
"That's all you'll be remembered for....." *wins world cup couple months later*🤣
🤣Chad Cummins 🗿
@@Spectrescup yes its team work
@@Spectrescup Cummins daddy of chokar team ind
What did Alex Carey did in that World Cup? Broad didn't said it to Cummins
Yeah but Broad did call him a disgrace.
He's not
-won ODI world cup
- won WTC
- lead Aus to a stunning victory in the first Ashes test
- captained sunrisers Hyderabad to the grand final
-an almost unbeaten home summer
-3 5 wicket hauls in a row
The list goes on
This man is unstoppable and NOT a disgrace.
Johnny sulking at the lords window is gold
😂
That should be a meme
orange gold 🤣😅😆😁😄😂
Hahahahaha the best part. Looks like he needed a depression counselor
HAHA🤣
Moments like these keep sports alive!
That is very true
Yeah u need a bit of controversy to spice it up
LOVE itttt
Johnny boy must have a memory of a goldfish... 'It’s within the rules of the game and that’s how it is!' - Bairstow 2014
How about when broady stood his ground after smashing the ball to 1st slip? The audacity 😂😂
England just feel a bit goofy sometimes😂😂
He tried to marnus in same match
@@Sauvage_Foxes it actually was parried off the keeper. Also last I checked many batters don't walk
@@thomasdavey3033 last I checked Johnny boy shouldn't of walked😂 btw it was parried because broad absolutely smashed it.
Well well well... England won world cup 2019 by the rule book.otherwise everyone know who is real lifter of cup... and now crowd crying....shut up mate
Steve Smith and the word 'crying' eh?
@@josephcole8046
England still don't have wc if they play fairly
@@bhogendrakhatiwada3053 If you're referring to the Stokes 'six', you're remarkably unintelligent 👍
Thought Steve smith would speak better English
I think England winning the World Cup was completely fair and I think what the Aussies did is completely fair as well. It's extremely hypocritical of English fans to celebrate winning a World Cup because of the laws while hating on the Aussies for taking a wicket using the laws.
Broad will also be remembered for not walking off when clearly nicking the ball. English cricket team falls back on the spirit of the game only when it suits them!
The umpire didn't give it and he's not obliged to walk
@@marknewbold2583we weren't obliged to revoke the appeal either. Deal with it
He'll always be remembered by 2 billion people for getting tonked for 6 sixes in an over 😂
NO. Completely different - because For me, walking or not walking is no longer a "Spirit of Cricket" issue since the introduction of DRS reviews. Broad didn't walk - but the Aussies had used up their reviews. Use of reviews are part of the game now, so not walking because you've burned your reviews is no longer a spirit of cricket issue.
Prior to DRS - yes - I might agree, but after DRS - Sorry, using your reviews sensibly is part and parcel of the game. You are supposed to use reviews for umpire "howlers" - but instead, teams routinely use DRS reviews to gain an advantage on marginal decisions. That's fine - but if you do that, you surrender your right to call howlers a "Spirit of Cricket" issue.
@@Quincycle No. Not obliged. Which is exactly why it's a Spirit of Cricket issue. The whole point is it's about being within the law, but not within the spirit.
The issue here is that the wicket came about through a confusion about whether the ball was dead.
Cricket, in order to be playable, requires the two teams to be sensible about agreeing when the ball is dead, otherwise the game would turn into a farce of double bluffs every single ball about whether the ball is dead.
It's part of the Spirit of Cricket, "Gentleman's agreement" To be sporting about the issue of dead ball, precisely so that play can continue in a smooth manner.
Otherwise you literally have the stupid pantomime that Broad demonstrated when he came out after Bairstow - of checking every single ball whether the ball was dead or not.
IT looked comical - but he was making a serious point - if teams start exploiting doubt over when the ball is dead to take wickets as a matter of routine, the game would descend into chaos.
'Same old England, Always crying'
They’ve flooded bloody London with all the tears by now.
same old Aussies Always winning
Same old England , always angry
@@yogeshKumar-xl9yl
Heck yeahhhh 🟡🟢🟡🟢
@@yogeshKumar-xl9yl err the series was 2_2 you haven't won here since 01 .
Broad to Carry - That's all you will be remembered for.
Carey - It's better than being remembered for getting hit for six sixes. 😂😂😂😂
And how many Test wickets?
@@marknewbold2583
You realise this is the guy who doesn’t know how to walk. Clearly shown in 2013
Don’t forget broad clearly edging the ball to Michael Clarke in Trent bridge in 2013 and not walking
@@BlakeLawlerAustralians use sandpaper to cheat. Not walking isn't cheating, whereas using sandpaper is cheating
@@BlakeLawlerwho cares. He’s one of the greatest bowlers of all time and a lovely guy. End of.
End of the day if bairstow had done that to an Aussie he would be considered a legend
100%. He already tried against Marnus
@@eyecontrol4900 and Warner.
@@WasimBarri
And literally 8 other English involvements over the past decade
yeah he tried to do it before he got out.
England fan here and Bairstow was out plain & simple only has himself to blame no one else fair &square
Marcus Harris: "You wrote the ••••ing rules, you idiot" - brilliant riposte.
This is not cheating, this is the presence of mind from patty, the ultimate legend.
Isn’t he just awesome?! Love Captain Pat.. he’s just the best ❤❤❤
He sure is!!
Definitely
Yeah Aussies on point i watched it live and the 1st initiative was taken by steve smith then patty comes, just loved Aussies and England always crying
it's not cheating but that doens't mean it isn't a cunt thing to do. Batsmen walk out of the crease after deliveries all the time, but if you're that desperate for an ashes win to resort to that then it speaks more about their character than anything else
Carey didn't even hold the ball, it's basically a stumping. No idea why the Brits crying so hard.
Tbf, they have effectively replaced AUS fans as the most toxic in the world these days. Or even the on field players. I remember someone threw a bottle cap at KL Rahul a couple of years back.
It's in the scorebook as a stumping, yes. So Green actually got the wicket.
Because they’re by definition Whinging Poms.
They got their revenge in the last test with the dodgy ball replacement
@@cdn4767
Really? I know 2 Australians who have been physically assaulted by Indian men in Indian stadiums.
There are a lot of words said by English crowds, but they don't start punching someone else because they support the other team and have a different skin colour.
@@StuTheDon17 I’m sure it did happened before, it’s just I don’t remember.
This will bring a smile to my face until the day I die. The gift that keeps giving.
Ken Oath mate
@@waggafletchercouldn't have happened to a more deserving bloke as well
Bairstows dumb look on his face when he realises the Aussie got him out with the same tactic he had been trying a few times in the tests prior to this one was priceless. Not sure why he hung around hoping to be given not out as he is well aware of the rule
Spirit of the game or not. If it's in the rules, you're allowed to use it to your advantage. Simple as that.
Yeah but it isn’t in the spirit of the game to stump someone who didn’t go out of his crease until when he thought the ball was dead. They weren’t trying to stump him for coming out of his crease while facing the ball so it is undoubtedly against the spirit of the game and the appeal should have been withdrawn. M
Its just as sly as mankading which people normally recognise as bad but not in this case apparently
@@joebowden4065 There should be far more mankading. It annoys me when cheating batters leave the crease.
Laws*
@@joebowden4065 was he the umpire? Only the umpire can call over and declare the ball dead. Just like with mankading it only happens when certain players go out of their crease over and over again.
As we've seen in this video, he was going out of his crease multiple times so the Aussies had every right to do what they did.
Marcus Harris in 8:28
Well Bloody said😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
After watching this he's my fav player
What did he say?? Couldn't hear it properly
@@lipasnaik1303 he said "you wrote the rules, you f-ing idiots", when talking about the MCC members abusing the Aussies.
@@lipasnaik1303 he said "you write the rules you f***ing idiot "
@@lipasnaik1303he said to an angry Englishman “you write the rules ya fkn idiot, it’s not our fault”
So, If bairstow would have casually reached the other end while fist bumping stokes in the middle without anyone noticing, would the umpires have given a single ?
It would need Stokes to also run. If they both ran and made their ground it would be 1 run.
@@UmpireStrikesBack that's what I meant. In retrospect, it would have been a change of strike. But If england would have appealed that hey that was a casual single, would the umpires had given it so?
@@ShubhamSharma-mb4og Yes.
@@UmpireStrikesBack Cool
@@ShubhamSharma-mb4og buddy batters don't change the strike the fielding team does. And if they are casually walking and ball has stoped the movement then it is declared dead and run can't be run after thay
"We ripped the soul out of them"- Pat Cummins
Always the objective against the Poms.
@@waggafletcherdidn't work, did it?
@@waggafletcherWinning by cheap means is your sporting culture
@@SarswotiPokhrel-i3m if its in rules its not considered as cheating
@user-lx9uv7ww5j just the other day, I saw Poms defending the fifth test ball change by saying "it's in the rules"
Cummins is a savage captain, he destroyed dreams of so many teams
Also an intelligent captain and good at man management.
Yeah.. and their dreams of t20 world cup got destroyed. 🤣
@ajaykc607 you'll find T20 isn't as popular here outside of the BBL. A lot of cricket fans didn't even watch it in the group stage
@@ajaykc607He wasn't even the captain during their T20 WC campaign...
@ajaykc607 we can't win everything mate.
The fact Bairstow tried the exact same thing to Marnus earlier on in the test makes his reaction all the more pathetic.
Only against 'the spirit of the game' when it's going against you apparently.
As always with England
Slowing the video makes it more dramatic. Carey throws it as quick as possible, you can not leave your crease that early
Fully Bairstows fault. You can shout all day about cheating etc but that was within the rules of a game AND Johnny is a bloody keeper too! From an Englishman.
Anyone remember the additional "overthrow" runs Eng and Stokes got in WC ODI Final vs NZ?
Ball hit bat then went for 4 so there was nothing Stokes or the umpires could do about it. If they ran for the overthrow THEN and only then could you say any thing.
That was clearly obstructing the field. Stokes came into the path of the ball.
@@Crickettoon-vl2jh Stokes trajectory altered not one jot therefore no obstruction occured.
Cummins should have said to Broady: “Well, we all know what you’ll be remembered for” 😂
8-15
@@dukeofoven 6 sixes.
@@eyecontrol4900irrelevant tho. He’s definitively one of the greatest bowlers of all time and a great guy.
@@grogu1986 he seems like he has poor sportsmanship like the rest of the english team (and the fans). I don't like Aussies much but this wasn't even remotely close to cheating. It's just english fans being butthurt, which is nothing new 😂
@@TurboThunda
Exactly Broad never walked himself after nicking the ball when Ashton Agar was bowling during Ashes 2015
8:05 "people stepped over the line" but bairstow didn't
He did step over, but didn't step back in it.
09:13 "Oh Broady! You have been such an outstanding citizen mate, ain't you?" :)
“They wrote the rules, didn’t they”. Loved that.
Love test cricket for it can produce these exact moments which neither ODIs or t20is can... Absolutely the purest and best form of cricket🔥
Even as an Englishman just get over it already. Old enough and wise enough to not leave your crease. I would have done the exact same as captain. Weather cost us a 3-2 win of the series. But Johnny also cost us that day! It is what it is.
And a brand new ball to replace a 38 over old ball contributed to England getting a 2-2 result.
@@longjohn5322 The umpires fault. Can’t blame the players.
Poor selection cost you the series. If you didn't have such idiotic selectors choosing Bairstow (an incompetent keeper who dropped multiple catches in the first game, whilst also scoring no runs) and Moeen (who had so many runs scored against him in the first game), England would have won both of the initial games of the series. There might have even been even a whitewash!
So good, love these behind the scenes cuts
Johhny literally tried doing the same thing in the previous game. Oh the double standards 🤦♂️
not true he did it to batters who were brought out of their crease by playing a shot, totally idfferent
@@Max-gk6ot okay, maybe I'm wrong. But a simple question, was the ball called dead? No, right? It's pretty fair imho. We can agree to disagree :)
This really should not have been as controversial as it was...Carey threw the ball immediately, it's on Bairstow for not checking where the ball was and for leaving the crease before the over had been called.
True
Broad said to cummins that u would be always remember for that
Well guess what Pat cummins will always be remember as a World Cup + WTC + ASHES winning captain in a same year!!!
And wlil go down as one of the best captains not like the boundary count winners or so xD
Didn’t actually win the ashes…
He also said it to Carey...and he was correct.
He said it to Carey. Check out what happened to the poor fella after. Hung out to dry.
wait a minute the world cup win due to 'boundary count' was actually legal, until the rule was changed in November 2019, which was after the world cup, so I don't see the problem with being world cup boundary count winners...
Pretending that drawing the ashes is somehow the same as winning them, while also pretending that England somehow weren't worthy world cup winners despite winning it completely within the rules, speaks volumes about your bias my friend
As a kiwi who has always rooted against the Aussie cricketers for their excessive arrogance and sledging, this made me actually root for them because of the way Cummins handled himself, and the way the hypocritical Pom’s and their media reacted.
My favourite part of this is Garry and Marnus’ reactions. They totally don’t GAF and are loving the drama like schoolgirls
“You wrote the f*ffing rules mate” 😅😅
An incorrect statement
Aussies definitely right in this case, so get on with it Poms. As a NZer, you very much got the rub of the rub of the rub of the green in that 2019 WC final too..
Australians don't play for appreciation. They play to win. Results speaks. They don't feel pressure in any situation.
As a Brit, they deserved appreciation, they were the ones playing by the rules
true sports mindset they have 🔥
It's "ridiculous" when ENGLAND talks about the "spirit of the game" (because of the 2019 world cup final) 😂😂
Broad: That's all you'll be remembered for
Carey: Let me ask Yuvraj what you'll be remembered for
Mitchell Marsh In The End 😂😂😂😂
Should have put the reaction on Bairstows face when they shook hands. Priceless 🤣
I felt for Johny the way he was shocked by what had happened. . . He had no clue. . . That is why awareness of the surrounding especially in cricket is so crucial! 😢
Brilliant awareness by the Aussies. Yes - many people will say that Bairstow had no intention of making a run but the same could be said when a batsman get stumped by slightly raising his foot off the crease. It is out all every day.
Oooh damn! Mitch Marsh made me have a good ole chuckle😂😂
Instead admitting Bairstow was wrong, both captain Ben stokes and coach Brendan McCullum double down saying it wasn't in the "spirit of cricket" and they wouldn't follow through with such tactics ... both have participated in such action many times in the past, demonstrating absolutely hypocrisy.
With also saw Starc catch in same game overturned the ball was "grounded" b/c starc used to ball to break his fall thus a safety issue.
Both times the letter of the law was used. Australia moved on ... unfortunately England did not. History will remember that England play in the "spirit of the game" only when it benefits themselves
3:30 one of the big mysterie is matt renshaw appealing to a ghost umpire
Any englishman going to complain, bear in mind that england had ALREADY tried to do the same thing to marnus labuschagne in the first innings (or at least previously, like when aus was batting).
Ironically it was the man himself Johnny Bairstow who attempted to do it.
In true English spirit he missed the wicket by miles but even if he had hit it, Marny put his bat in his crease until he knew he was clear to leave it.
The background music when all ausies were plotting the run out made me feel like hunter is spying out on his prey. and the fact that all aussies were aware about biarstow moving out of screeze shows their match awareness.
Exactly just like a pack of predators preying on their target silently in bushes
The larger louts have no idea of the rules of the game! This surely was the low point of Lords. The behaviour in the Long Room was appalling and may lead to teams entering the oval by means other than the long room and that would be a pity! The rules of the game are ABSOLUTELY clear!
Imagine the celebrations if Stokes had pulled this one off(which he almost did)
I'm tipping there would be no withdrawn appeal or recall and the English press and pasty-faced MCC members would be hailing Stokes a genius.
If that would have happened, the 2 greatest Test Innings ever played would have both belonged to Ben Stokes.
Imagine the celebrations had it not rained in Manchester; eng would've won it and the series
@@ranks9354 Rain and Ball change saved England at 5th Test🤷♂️
@@ranks9354 rubbish
according to the rules, " After six deliveries the umpire calls 'over'; the fielding team switches ends, and a different bowler is selected to bowl from the opposite end." the aussies asked the umpire and he said he had not said over. Please tell me how its cheating is they followed the rules of the game. thanks Bairstow for the endless fails
That Nathan Lyon laugh 4:00 was gold 😂
I just love the "SHUT IT!!!" hahaha
I feel for Australia here that was the rules Bairstow was out for walking out of his crease before the umpire saying over it was absolutely disgraceful and ridiculous from the English fans
Why didn't they show the videos of Bairstow doing the same thing to other batters before this incident?
The incident you're referring to isn't remotely the same but if it helps you cope with the desperatation of this cheap wicket then good for you 😂👏
@@Profanity1 Bairstow tried running out Marnus Labushagne on Day 3 of the same test. Internet is free dickhead
@Profanity1 Internet is free Bairstow was reminded after the incident that on day three of the Lord’s Test, Bairstow attempted to stump Marnus Labuschagne in the exact same fashion in which he was dismissed two days later.
Nice try mate but next time you want to seem smart, stop, check what you writing and then don't write anything. It's better to be a silent fool than to give voice and have it confirmed.
@@Peter-e8y If you can't understand the difference between a batsman batting out of his crease and therefore trying to gain an advantage compared to a batsman thinking the ball is dead and walking out of his crease to the middle after the over then you're not very intelligent at all..
@Profanity1 and if you can't watch the video of Bairstow and Labushagne on day 3 then your as blind as you are stupid. It's okay, go play with your Lego. Adults are talking
A handful of cricketers are known for walking before the umpire raises the finger.
Johnny Bairstow will go down in history as the only player who walks before he has even been dismissed.
😂Excellent
Same old England always cry,
Same old Aussies always winning.
They haven't won in England for 23 years lol.
Really ? I remember your boys crying when the England crowd got at them in the next tests.
@@Spectrescup don't need to win there just retain like the 90's west indies
@@Spectrescup what about england when was the last time England won test match in Australia.😭
@@micheal197012 u guys have kept ur bar really low😂😂
I’m english and could never understand, even at the time, the controversy. Astute, switched on play that caught Bairstow napping. Open and shut case.
Bairstow was out fair and square. Tell your story walking champ.
I love Root at 2:23: ‘that’s out.’
Yes it is
England: 'same old Aussies always cheating'
I say ' same old England always whining'
No offence to the English supporters
Nah, full offence to the whinging poms
Haha 😂. Can't argue with that
@@AxeDharme Whinging cons more like...sandpaper anyone?
@@AshesHereos colonizing (stealing) anyone??
Worldcup without cheating anyone??
@@AshesHereosand obviously this was not cheating from any point of view
It was Bairstow's mistake all along
Love Australia for providing such moments make sports interesting keep doing it game needs it ❤ from 🇮🇳
That's out. Well done Carey 👏🏼
Simply clever cricket by the Australians. Sorry, Poms. This is just good match awareness. The Aussies saw a weakness and they targeted that weakness. It's not backyard cricket here, guys!
As an Aussie watching this live and all the follow up I said then and still say now.. FAVOURITE ASHES MOMENT EVER!!! Sums up everything that the Ashes is and has come from.. Those damn colonials facing up to the mother country on their home turf and winning.. how dare they! Whinging Poms cheeky Aussies f**king love it! First ever ashes to now
Ye, it's the Ashes. It's always gonna be a bit dirty from time to time. Bodyline is another example, but it's still not great if a team resorts to that sort of thing to win a game.
It's in your nature convict
@@JustinHH22 interestingly I do come from OG convict stock! Most proud of that .. 🇦🇺❤️
Is scraping a lucky 2-2 called “winning” now?
@@Zlatano-pc5pd retained the urn that’s a win
The only people bitching about it is England. Bloody hypocrites. Don't even know the rules to their own sport.
They wrote the rules they know! Everyone cricketer knows to stay in their crease! It is basically a stumping. The umpire hasn’t called dead ball as well like!?!? Stay in your crease, no excuses!
Buddy, my 6 year old son hasd more cricketing awareness than Bairstow.
@ 😅
The passion and drama was amazing regardless of what team you support - test cricket felt well and truly alive
Broad: that's what you are gonna be remembered for
Boy what happened during 2013 ashes did you forgot that you nicked the ball to first slip not even the keeper and still stood your ground, ashamed that post that you played this long for England and became a legend and English crowd same old Aussie's always cheating hell if your team is that gentlemen why didn't they showed sportsman spirit when ball went to the boundary after ricocheting through Stokes bat, most pathetic crowd the world Has in any sport
Because both of those things (all 3 of those things) required an umpires decision, which was abided by. The only one to have the grace to be sheepish about it was Stokes, who apologised, but the Kiwis have always been popular over here.
As for most 'pathetic crowd', to what are you referring, as Australians adore going to England for the Ashes as the atmospheres are unique in world cricket.
They're not called whinging poms for nothing.
8:30 - amazing clapback lmao.
This incident will always be memorable 😭
bairstows a goose and has thrown stumps down before in county matches when the batsman has walked out of his crease. and england did get a brand new cherry made of granite saving them from defeat a few tests later, no need to cry lol
There's a reason why the Aussies are the best Cricket Nation of al time😂 simply the best
Marcus Harris 😂😂
You gotta do more than rake your foot in the crease. Always tap your bat in at the end of the over
You can’t beat seeing the English having a little cry 😂. Owzzzzzzatttttt 😅
Didn't they use your country as a literal prison? lmao
@@theaveragecube_ Pretty decent prison though. Beautiful weather, beautiful beaches, wide open spaces...ahhhh feel the serenity :)
Marcus Harris was on point😂
They gave Jonny ample time to stop walking out his crease, so fair game!
Excellent observation by Cummins and executive by Australia.
South African here. Behind the Aussies all the way in this one...
I personally think this moment cost Australia an ashes win. Totally changed the mood over here, and galvanised them.
I think so too, however if Carey didn't stump Bairstow then we probably would've lost the came and even the series.
Who holds the Ashes at this time?
Why is Season 3 geoblocked on Prime in Japan?? The first two seasons are available 😥
Marcus Harris fkn nailed it - “you write the f…in rules…”
AS an Indian, that is out, clearly. "Spirit of Cricket" is an argument used by the English only when it favours them. All Stuart Broad will be remembered for will be playing 2nd fiddle to Jimmy Anderson.
Cummins had the option to withdraw the appeal. Bairstow had the option to ensure the ball was dead before going strolling for no good reason after every ball. Which came first?
7:53 is this old Warner
Jonny can’t be complaining, he’s tried it before as well, it’s so blatantly stupid, like it’s out, lords has never been like that EVER
It's a very unusual way to be given out, but it is definitely the correct decision.
Bairstow and McCullum have both done more questionable things than this behind the stumps. Neither have a leg to stand on.
Donkey walked out of his crease, 100% out of
Bairstow only has himself to blame, that was the right decision. coming from an Englishman
It was not a runout, it was a stumping
8:31 Marcus Harris..that’s savage.