sum-to-product identity for sine, trigonometry proof

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 3 бер 2018
  • Proving the sum to product identity for sine,
    Angle sum identity • Angle sum identities f...
    sum-to-product identity for sine, trigonometry proof

КОМЕНТАРІ • 71

  • @shrihari154
    @shrihari154 6 років тому +34

    Sir now Ill completely forget memorizing these formula
    Because from Now on I can derive these formula anytime , anywhere
    Long Live BlackPenRedPen Yeeay!!!

  • @franseresplandor8591
    @franseresplandor8591 29 днів тому +1

    this is probably the best teacher I have in terms of all the trigonometic identities. Very simple and consice! Love it!

  • @reazraza
    @reazraza 6 років тому +31

    Blackpenredpen white paper. You are uplifting the channel name. Good job!

    • @blackpenredpen
      @blackpenredpen  6 років тому

      Yup!!!! Thanks!!!!

    • @JM-hu3pk
      @JM-hu3pk 3 роки тому

      @@blackpenredpen love this vid. kinda irrelevant, but what pens do you use?

  • @carterwoodson8818
    @carterwoodson8818 3 роки тому +1

    I am so happy you put this up 2 YEARS AGO!!! thank you so much, never investigated these relationships

  • @diesitreinta
    @diesitreinta 6 років тому +6

    This proof videos are my favorite, thanks! Love u ❤

  • @crystalhuang8258
    @crystalhuang8258 6 років тому +4

    I have been looking for a proof just like this and found it. Thank you so much!

  • @humester
    @humester 2 роки тому

    5*: Everything I have found on the Internet so far has been a proof, not a derivation; meaning that they start with the answer and then simplify the answer on the RHS to equal the LHS. Yours is the first real derivation I've found. Love it!

  • @julianarodrigues1861
    @julianarodrigues1861 5 років тому +1

    You make me so happy now, thanks a lot!

  • @gustavosedano294
    @gustavosedano294 6 років тому +5

    That demostrative videos are amazing!!!

  • @rithiek5446
    @rithiek5446 6 років тому

    Wanted to say Thank you! Learnt a lot from you till date :)

  • @jagsingh2508
    @jagsingh2508 6 років тому

    Thank you very much!!! It becomes so much easier to memorise now that I know how it works, video very much appreciated!

  • @JJ-uj1wi
    @JJ-uj1wi 10 місяців тому

    Thank you! I have been find the proofs for this, since the precalculus lesson I attended didn't prove this for us

  • @headmanlesetlhe1635
    @headmanlesetlhe1635 Рік тому

    beautiful magnificently explained.... thank you so much

  • @jaywyn2584
    @jaywyn2584 Рік тому

    My textbook did a terrible job explaining this proof, and most proofs I found involve proving itself. Thanks for making this proof crystal clear. Well done.

  • @BashirArsine
    @BashirArsine 2 роки тому

    After 11 months, still helpful!

  • @tariqhaiderbhuiyan2461
    @tariqhaiderbhuiyan2461 2 роки тому

    Really helped me out!

  • @florianvanbondoc3539
    @florianvanbondoc3539 2 роки тому

    That's just great! 😯

  • @BashirArsine
    @BashirArsine 3 роки тому +1

    Great video, thx.

  • @sansamman4619
    @sansamman4619 6 років тому +4

    THIS IS SO FUN! please keep on proving stuff and do more videos with this OG style!!

  • @houwen7697
    @houwen7697 4 роки тому

    this helped me understand! thank you

  • @marcioamaral7511
    @marcioamaral7511 6 років тому +2

    Pretty easy identity to prove but still a useful one

  • @Lily-zd6dx
    @Lily-zd6dx 5 років тому +2

    thank you so much!!!

  • @BigDBrian
    @BigDBrian 6 років тому +4

    an informal way to derive alpha in terms of A and B:
    Say for example we take sin(40) + sin(60). how would we determine alpha and beta? well, it's not too hard to see it'll be 50-10 and 50+10. alpha is fifty, because it's the average, and beta is 10, because its the difference between each term and the average.

  • @anything6889
    @anything6889 6 років тому

    Cool job!!!

  • @eleazaralmazan4089
    @eleazaralmazan4089 6 років тому +1

    Can you make videos explaining how to solve equations involving the floor function? An example of such equation would be floor(x)-2floor(x/2) = 1.
    Great videos by the way!

  • @mandre2390
    @mandre2390 4 роки тому

    bless ur soul

  • @baskard8018
    @baskard8018 6 років тому +1

    I like the video so much.

  • @faridsalmanalfarisyi4099
    @faridsalmanalfarisyi4099 Рік тому

    amazing

  • @balyoz3349
    @balyoz3349 3 роки тому

    thank you so much

  • @tasninnewaz6790
    @tasninnewaz6790 6 років тому +3

    Everybody know this. your are my favourite teacher and i hoped that it will be a geometric explain.

  • @jimpal5119
    @jimpal5119 6 років тому +3

    Where’s the dabbing man? Love the vids👌

  • @copperfield42
    @copperfield42 6 років тому +2

    this is a very elegant proof.
    I on the other hand, started from the 2sin((a+b)/2)cos((a-b)/2) and arrive at sin(a)+sin(b):
    2sin((a+b)/2)cos((a-b)/2)
    =2[cos(a/2)sin(b/2) + cos(b/2)sin(a/2)][cos(a/2)cos(-b/2) -sin(a/2)sin(-b/2) ]
    =2[cos(a/2)sin(b/2) + cos(b/2)sin(a/2)][cos(a/2)cos(b/2) +sin(a/2)sin(b/2) ]
    =2[ cos(a/2)sin(a/2)(cos^2(b/2)+sin^2(b/2)) + cos(b/2)sin(b/2)(cos^2(a/2)+sin^2(a/2)) ]
    =2[ cos(a/2)sin(a/2) + cos(b/2)sin(b/2) ]
    =2cos(a/2)sin(a/2) + 2cos(b/2)sin(b/2)
    =sin(2a/2) + sin(2b/2)
    =sin(a) + sin(b)

    • @emmamjkang
      @emmamjkang 4 роки тому

      How did you get from
      =2[ cos(a/2)sin(a/2)(cos^2(b/2)+sin^2(b/2)) + cos(b/2)sin(b/2)(cos^2(a/2)+sin^2(a/2)) ]
      =2[ cos(a/2)sin(a/2) + cos(b/2)sin(b/2) ]
      ?

  • @gergodenes6360
    @gergodenes6360 6 років тому

    For the difference, it is sin(A)-sin(B)=2*cos((A+B)/2)*sin((A-B)/2)
    I love these so much. All just connects together. I lvoe math.

  • @alejrandom6592
    @alejrandom6592 3 роки тому

    trigonometric proofs are beautiful

  • @wduandy
    @wduandy 6 років тому +2

    Can you racionalize 1/[cuberoot(a)+cuberoot(b)+cuberoot(c)] please? Love your videos

  • @nikoladjordjevic2706
    @nikoladjordjevic2706 6 років тому +1

    Could you please do int_0^1 int_0^1 [1/(1-xy)] dx dy = zeta(2)?
    Thank you and of course great channel ;D

  • @FJ-mn2pi
    @FJ-mn2pi 3 роки тому

    谢谢

  • @That_One_Guy...
    @That_One_Guy... 5 років тому

    can you derive this formula using euler's formula ? (without subtituting alpha+beta = A and alpha-beta = B ?)

  • @royler8848
    @royler8848 6 років тому +4

    The sin (a+b)
    Vid isn't in the description

    • @raiedahmednishat8883
      @raiedahmednishat8883 6 років тому

      yah, that's what I looked for too

    • @blackpenredpen
      @blackpenredpen  6 років тому

      Boypig24 sorry I forgot. It's here ua-cam.com/video/2SlvKnlVx7U/v-deo.html

  • @user-gg7xb2os9y
    @user-gg7xb2os9y 5 днів тому

    thanks brother proof of sum to product identities is not in my book for some reason

  • @aneeshsrinivas9088
    @aneeshsrinivas9088 3 роки тому

    this identity makes it not circular reasoning to use lhopitals rule on lim_{h->0} (1-cos(h))/h, because you can derive the cosine versions of this identity by replacing a with a+π/2, and b with b+π/2, and for proving the derivitives of sine and cosine, just use these identities instead of expanding out via the sum and difference identities, d/dx(sin(x))=lim_{h->0} (sin(x+h)-sin(x))/h=lim_{h->0} (2cos((x+h+x)/2)sin((x+h-x)/2))/h=lim_{h->0} (2cos(x+h/2)sin(h/2))/h, and do the same thing for cosine

  • @malathim2882
    @malathim2882 4 роки тому

    First I was scared 😬💀 f d channel but it was very useful

  • @MarkMcDaniel
    @MarkMcDaniel 6 років тому

    Did your school tell you that you can't use their classroom white board for videos any longer?

    • @blackpenredpen
      @blackpenredpen  6 років тому

      Snarky Mark I live 42 miles away from my school.

    • @MarkMcDaniel
      @MarkMcDaniel 6 років тому

      Ouch, quite the commute.

  • @pchk1
    @pchk1 6 років тому +1

    Very curious at 3:33 . . .
    Aww, why bother with the clumsy step of
    multiplying alpha - beta = B by negative one at all?
    Come on, simply SUBTRACT the whole thing from alpha + beta = A,
    and you IMMEDIATELY get 2beta = A - B
    Also, at 4:30 . . .
    No parentheses will be necessary for single-variable arguments in trigonometric functions, thus it is perfectly ok to write sinA + sinB rather than the, again very clumsy, sin(A) + sin(B) . . . especially that you were already writing in black and red ^_^
    Finally, are you also on Facebook? I'd love to join you if you happen to be there!

  • @malathim2882
    @malathim2882 4 роки тому

    But be clear with video clarity it's somehow blurrrr

  • @shrihari154
    @shrihari154 6 років тому

    For those who looking for video link mentioned in the video i.e formula for Sum of angles
    here it is: ua-cam.com/video/2SlvKnlVx7U/v-deo.html

  • @smitashripad9757
    @smitashripad9757 6 років тому

    Does there exists something like that for cosine

    • @blackpenredpen
      @blackpenredpen  6 років тому

      Yes! Use the sum and difference formulas for cosine and you can get the results.

  • @kenichimori8533
    @kenichimori8533 6 років тому +1

    The point P ≒ P

  • @kobethebeefinmathworld953
    @kobethebeefinmathworld953 6 років тому +1

    I wonder who thumbs down

  • @jahanaraparveen9436
    @jahanaraparveen9436 6 років тому

    e^xcosz-(1/3)e^(3x)cos(3z)+(1/5)e^(5x)cos(5z)-....
    Please help me with this series.I am asked to find the infinite sum of this series.Got this from a complex variable book. :/

  • @yenyelinito
    @yenyelinito 3 роки тому

    Link for those pens please lmao

  • @indra9013
    @indra9013 5 років тому

  • @andrewalex3581
    @andrewalex3581 6 років тому

    solve pls sin(3x)/cos(x)=39/41

  • @dudenD8000
    @dudenD8000 4 роки тому

    老哥,听不懂啊

  • @hariskayani4703
    @hariskayani4703 6 років тому

    Can you solve
    Z^3 - 4j = 0

    • @strangemathematician1572
      @strangemathematician1572 6 років тому

      What did you ment by w and j? Are they random variables?if they are so you need at lest one more equation to solve them