I remember when Mythbusters tested this. Still interesting. Imagine going for a swim and having to shower afterwards not to wash off the chlorine, but the stickiness.
And now we know that it wouldn't be more interesting at all. It would be exactly the same. Unless you use a syrup that's at least 3x more viscous than water.
That is always misquoted to mean the opposite of what it was supposed to: “the blood of the covenant is thicker than the water of the womb.” As in, the things you agree to and buy into have more influence over your life than your family. Make or join your covenants wisely
As a swimmer, what I can tell you is that if you were to put me in syrup, I might be able to swim just as fast, but I wouldn't be able to swim for nearly as long. I believe this is what we were seeing with the turtle in the extra-thick syrup. The first thing you need is enough power to propel yourself forward in whatever liquid you're in, and if you don't have enough power to push against the fluid, you're doomed. Indeed, swimmers often make things harder AND easier on themselves by wearing drag suits (or even just all their clothes) and wide paddles. Swimming with hand paddles makes you much faster, but your arms tire out a lot sooner. You can push harder because the surface area of your hand becomes bigger, but if you lack enough musculature to push yourself forward, it doesn't really matter. You could pair your paddles with a drag suit to maintain the same speed as unencumbered, but you would fatigue sooner. (This would be a valuable exercise for a swimmer-basically, it's just building muscle and fatigue resistance over a shorter time. It may cause joint problems, though, because you're really loading the shoulders and elbows. I doubt anyone would do this for long.) I'm not a physicist, but even on its face, this seems like it would require more energy. You can swim just as fast because you can *push harder* to overcome more drag. Pushing harder by definition means more force. What you should test is how long can a battery powered device continue to propel the craft in the more viscous fluid versus in water. I suspect it would last fractionally as long in the syrup. Probably half as long for a liquid that's twice as viscous, but it probably also relates to what the average output of the motor is.
I thought about this for a minute, but in truth, what's happening isn't that the turtle is pushing harder. If the turtle had to push harder, and thus use more power, in order to be able to make it through the syrup at the same speed, it would have been slower in this video. This is due to the fact it has the exact same motor as the other toy and uses the same motor whether in water or syrup, and no matter what always uses the same amount of power, unlike a human. If the turtle were using for example 10W of power to get across the water, it wouldn't suddenly start pulling 20W of power to get across the syrup at the same speed. It would still be using the same motor at the same power, meaning that if it truly needed more power to keep its pace then it wouldn't be keeping pace with the toy in the water in the first place. What's happening, as he said, is simply that each stroke the toy takes with the power it would be using in water should be slowed down by the syrup's viscosity, but is instead counteracted by how far the turtle gets pushed due to how easy it is to propel itself through the syrup comparative to water. Using the same amount of force, it is able to push itself further, but also is slowed down by viscosity, meaning it ultimately ends up the same speed and the same amount of energy used.
@@CyberCactus i thought of this too, but this is a matter of two things here: torque and maximum speed. the torque of the motor is enough to keep the flaps spinning at max speed in the syrup as in water, and since the maximum speed of the motor is the same in both liquids, there is no difference. (It probably also consume more energy, but im not really sure about that, im not very literate in electronics.) If the motor was not as powerful, you would indeed see the difference in speed, as it would slow down in syrup. in fact it actually did, in the more viscous liquid. the motor's torque was overmatched by the viscosity, as it could barely move its flaps.
@@StickyIckyOOHWAY Well if the toy was merely able to keep itself at max speed in the syrup, but had to pull more power to be able to do so, then it would logically have to be pulling less power from its motor to go the same speed in the water. This would require some kind of cap or limiter to be in place preventing the toy from pushing its little paddles harder than it does while it's in water. Otherwise, it would always use the same power and the same expended energy across liquids. I doubt the little toys he used in the video had any limiter that prevented them from putting the same amount of power into the water as they did into the syrup, and without limitations in water the max speed simply would have been *higher* in the water than it would in the syrup if the syrup were requiring more energy to wade through, due to the paddles having the same power from the motor which results in an easier time moving the paddles in the first place. I agree that the motor's lack of torque was a major contributor in why it wasn't able to move through the much more viscous liquid at the end. These fluid dynamics are strange but it seems there is simply a point in viscosity in which things stop moving easily, but until that point everything moves the same, like he went over at the end of the video. I'd love to see more demonstrations of the experiments so I can actually understand it better, at the moment admittedly I'm just theorising. You could absolutely be right and I'm missing something but so far I'm still convinced about my energy argument.
I think increasing the viscosity would feel like switching to a bigger gear on a bike - it gets harder to move, but you can move faster by moving your feet (or arms) less, so it has about the same speed either way
Which makes me think though (He may have explained it in the video already and I am just too impatient to watch it all) won't there be a certain point where the viscosity is so high that pushing basically becomes so hard it's unachievable, and therefore swimming in water would be faster. Because when you up the gear on a bike, there is a certain point especially at an incline where you just can't physically push against it. Although I assume this video is also talking a little hypothetically, as in, if you had infinite amount of strength to push against the liquid
@@BariumCobaltNitrog3n relax... knowing is enough, correcting others' spelling is for busy bodies who have nothing to contribute other than corrections because they are overly critical.
I think with the more viscous liquids you can swim the same speed but it takes more exertion. The amount of force that you’re able to apply on the syrup is greater than the amount you can apply on the water, but that still means you have to push harder. So with the really viscous syrup, you reached the limit of the amount of force that the turtle could apply so it couldn’t swim as fast. If you had significantly stronger motors it might still be able to swim as fast or only a little slower. It makes no sense that an effect would just disappear outside of a specific range of viscosities. It would have to slowly fade (meaning that the speed slowly decreases) as the viscosity increased.
I agree. The turtle swimming slower is not a property of the liquid but of the turtle system being too highly damped by the syrup. It ain't got the gas!
Exactly, the skin drag vs form drag argument didn't make much sense, your reasoning was what I was thinking as well. As long as the swimming object has enough power to move the propellers/flippers with the same rate, they will move with the same speed.
It's not a matter of the effect disappearing. It's a matter of one of the effects being 'used up'. When viscosity grows up from water, if you use the SAME amount of strength, while you need more strength to move through the more viscous liquid, more of the strength you used to move actually is applied. But at some point, the increase in strength needed will be higher than the gain from higher efficiency. Let's add some numbers to it. Let's say you move at 1km/h if you put in 100 energy in water. You put in 200 energy but because the water is thin, only 100 units of that energy are actually propelling you forward. Now, you put in 200 energy into a more viscous syrop. Because it's more viscous it takes 150 energy to move at 1km/h in it, BUT thanks to that trait, 150 energy from the 200 you use is also propelling you forward, so you still move at the same speed. Now, raise the viscosity much higher and you get to a point where to reach a speed of 1km/h you need to provide more than 200 energy, say 210. It doesn't matter that almost all the energy you use is used to proper you forward (it cannot be 100%, as that would be a solid object). You just have to raise the energy to move faster, so for example, you will have to use 212 energy. That's 12 energy more than you could have used in the less viscous liquids. This is the point made in this video. The moment you raise the viscosity past the stage where the efficiency increases at the same rate as energy requirement, you have no choice but to increase the energy input for the same effect. But if you are comparing your best time in water, you simply CANNOT increase energy input, hence you WILL be slower.
@@bscutajar But they need to input more energy for the same effect, therefore no, you cannot swim at the same speed in a much more viscous fluid as you can in water. You cannot suddenly become stronger simply by swimming in a thicker fluid. If you could, then your time in water would be shortened and you still would have been doing a worse time in the viscous fluid. You are changing the problem here from a body with a fixed ability, to two separate bodies with different abilities. That's an entirely different experiment, and one that never needed any sort of confirmation as it is absolutely clear that so long as you provide enough energy, an object can move through literally anything at any given speed (below the speed of light, and assuming it can withstand moving through said environment).
@ATHARV KAWLE I think he meant that the straw ban didn't really do anything to help the wildlife since that doesn't stop more harmful material like metal from also becoming litter, so the ban is utterly pointless since it's not just plastic rubble killing the turtles
As a swimmer, I can say that these results are true under the assumption that swimmers apply a constant force on the water, and in some ways this is true. But for strokes that rely more on a gliding lotion the added resistance from the water will make a huge difference, not to mention the added stress on ligaments and joints from the higher impact forces. I mean it’s a rotator cuff injury waiting to happen. But for plastic turtles who apply an almost constant force it’ll probably work just fine.
I love that you switched the turtle toys between the first and second swim tests. That eliminates any possibility of power differences changing the results.
But does syrup increase the energy per stroke? It's almost like a gear reduction. The lower the ratio, the more torque you have. Thus less energy needed per turn. Syrup is like this case but the opposite. Need explanation. Halp
Syrup with not require more energy per stroke... Because if u think about it the speed of movement is the same in both liquids... If it required more energy per stroke then there would have been a reduction in speed as well
If more energy was required then u would have to stroke faster to keep up with the speed in water.... But in the case of the toys shown, the speed of stroking was the same as well as the displacement of the toys
I was one of the "professional" swimmers that participated in this study. It was pretty wild. The guar gum liquid wasn't sticky, more slimy. There was a big layer of it at the bottom because it was hard to keep it in suspension, as the pumps created turbulence that would have altered the results.
@@Matthewsala they were closely monitoring the viscosity of the upper portion of the pool in which we were swimming, so I'm sure they achieved the desired test conditions (to whatever extent it could be expected). The bottom of the pool however, was a gloriously disgusting mass of about 3-6 inches of goo, with a consistency somewhere between papier mache paste and wet boogers.
@@robmangeri777 less than I would have thought. Hard to ignore the squish of the guard gum that settled to bottom of the pool between your toes though!
@@stinksorstonks1498 you can literally just look up "mythbusters swimming in syrup" and you find clips from the episode but here you go ua-cam.com/video/ub82Xb1C8os/v-deo.html
Me: “let’s read some comments” Comments: “did anyone else think he was gonna swim in syrup?” “I clicked on this thinking he was gonna swim in syrup” “I wish he had have actually swum in syrup”
You should retry the experiment with ether or acetone, or some other very low viscosity liquid, to see if something four times less viscous than water has an inverse effect or not.
I thought so too, but you would probably want to use ethanol or methanol, because acetone would do bad things to the plastic, and ether vapor would do bad things to you (as well as ignite on the slightest excuse).
Great thought experiment! I would try an experiment where more of the toy is more submerged. Right now it seems the turtle is staying mostly out of the viscous liquid, so the increase in drag is only experienced by the belly surface. As a swimmer, you aim to go as high as possible, but majority of your body is still underwater. Try a toy submarine!
I'd say no as the turtle traveled at the same speed. If pushing was harder (and therefore more tyring) it would have gone slower as it can only push at one speed.
There’s an optimal viscosity that allows more of your limb energy to transfer into forward movement. Each person's own swimming strength would determine how viscous that is.
@@beady0081 I assume it would matter how viscous the fluid was. The turtle in pure syrup didn’t produce enough force to move through it hardly at all, but I wonder how a human would faire? The turtle is obviously a mechanical toy meant to move through water. A human can adapt. Maybe swimming normally through pure syrup doesn’t work as well but you can adjust your technique to compensate in some other way. Who knows. I don’t think humans are going to value swimming through syrup enough to master the art lol
We didn't swim long enough to really tire out, and we rested a lot between repeats. Also, we randomly switched between the thickened and control pools to make sure cumulative fatigue wouldn't be an issue.
I appreciate that you actually tried an experiment with really thick syrup. It always bugged me when they did this on Mythbusters that the syrup they used looked so thin, because I was sure that making the syrup seriously thick would have a noticeably different result, which is exactly what we see here. That said, I am extremely disappointed that there was no full-scale experiment.
The Mythbusters already tested this in 2009. Episode 118. It was PLAUSIBLE Adam and Jamie began by digging two long trenches and lining them with plastic sheeting to serve as swimming pools. They filled one with water and the other with high-viscosity syrup made from 750 pounds (340 kg) of guar gum and 10,000 US gallons (38,000 L) of water. Adam and Jamie each swam three lengths in the water to establish their average times, then did the same in the syrup. Adam’s time in syrup was 28% slower than in water; Jamie tired quickly and withdrew from further testing. They also performed tests with other syrup formulas with lower viscosity. Adam again swam three lengths in each pool and found that his syrup time was now only 2.8% to 5.4% slower than in water. Next, they invited Olympic gold medalist swimmer Nathan Adrian swim through each substance. Nathan’s times were erratic because his technique was so highly honed for pure water, and his results were thrown out. Based on the results for light and medium syrup, which they considered to be within the margin of error for their testing method, Adam and Jamie declared the myth plausible.
With syrup you have almost a grip, it puts more resistance on your body allowing you to almost grab onto something and physically push off of it while swimming. Granted the viscosity of syrup is way higher than water, but they both have liquid properties. Both are swimmable and both can be traveled in.
The turtle also took longer in the thick syrup because its movement range is just rotating and the shape of the wing is a spoon, so it had a hardtime rotating under the syrup
I would have liked to see also the effect of liquid density in the mix. If a denser liquid is also more viscous, the added buoyancy can help you a lot by keeping you perfectly horizontal and partly out of the water, while a not-so-good swimmer will be too submerged to swim efficiently.
To anyone who thinks waters isn’t wet, watch the first thirty seconds of this video. Water is less dense molecularly and such you ‘slip’ through it just like if you were to hydroplane on something wet.
I remember when Mythbusters tested this. Still interesting.
Imagine going for a swim and having to shower afterwards not to wash off the chlorine, but the stickiness.
Who said I wanted to wash off the stickiness
Yeah I clicked on this remember that episode and they proved that it was faster.
@@TheBiscuitFactory Kevin Gomolchak
I can just lick myself
Get down with the stickiness.
Everyone who thought he was actually going to swim in syrup: My disappointment is immeasurable and my day is ruined
I....I have been bamboozled
imagine how sticky that would feel. i have a terrible day when I get syrup on my pants but my entire body?
Man I am relived he isn’t wasting 1000s of dollars worth of syrup for this.
Wait...he isn’t...
Me reading this before watching the vid
I can’t believe this, I was joking not long ago about making Olympic swimmers swim through syrup to make it more interesting 🤣
Now it's possible!
I was thinking about a little, yellow, cheese flavored stalagmite that's edible! Everybody, meet CHEETOS!!!
And now we know that it wouldn't be more interesting at all. It would be exactly the same. Unless you use a syrup that's at least 3x more viscous than water.
That happened!
@@ThePrufessa Yeah, but eh-
Omg I can just imagine how uncomfortable it is to be covered in syrup.
You can pee in a pool of syrup and drink it afterwards.
@@LSnium Yummy
@@LSnium thats distusting lmao
@@LSnium of course the person who says that is a furry.
@@LSnium slow with trends. Aren’t ya?
“Blood is thicker that water”
Syrup is thicker than blood
Pancakes are more important than family
Wise...
😂
That is always misquoted to mean the opposite of what it was supposed to: “the blood of the covenant is thicker than the water of the womb.” As in, the things you agree to and buy into have more influence over your life than your family. Make or join your covenants wisely
Poop is thicker than Syrup. so...........
@@TrueZenquiorra MOM I NEED MORE POOPCAKES
As a swimmer, what I can tell you is that if you were to put me in syrup, I might be able to swim just as fast, but I wouldn't be able to swim for nearly as long. I believe this is what we were seeing with the turtle in the extra-thick syrup. The first thing you need is enough power to propel yourself forward in whatever liquid you're in, and if you don't have enough power to push against the fluid, you're doomed. Indeed, swimmers often make things harder AND easier on themselves by wearing drag suits (or even just all their clothes) and wide paddles.
Swimming with hand paddles makes you much faster, but your arms tire out a lot sooner. You can push harder because the surface area of your hand becomes bigger, but if you lack enough musculature to push yourself forward, it doesn't really matter. You could pair your paddles with a drag suit to maintain the same speed as unencumbered, but you would fatigue sooner. (This would be a valuable exercise for a swimmer-basically, it's just building muscle and fatigue resistance over a shorter time. It may cause joint problems, though, because you're really loading the shoulders and elbows. I doubt anyone would do this for long.)
I'm not a physicist, but even on its face, this seems like it would require more energy. You can swim just as fast because you can *push harder* to overcome more drag. Pushing harder by definition means more force.
What you should test is how long can a battery powered device continue to propel the craft in the more viscous fluid versus in water. I suspect it would last fractionally as long in the syrup. Probably half as long for a liquid that's twice as viscous, but it probably also relates to what the average output of the motor is.
Wow. Just wow
Underrated comment
I thought about this for a minute, but in truth, what's happening isn't that the turtle is pushing harder. If the turtle had to push harder, and thus use more power, in order to be able to make it through the syrup at the same speed, it would have been slower in this video. This is due to the fact it has the exact same motor as the other toy and uses the same motor whether in water or syrup, and no matter what always uses the same amount of power, unlike a human.
If the turtle were using for example 10W of power to get across the water, it wouldn't suddenly start pulling 20W of power to get across the syrup at the same speed. It would still be using the same motor at the same power, meaning that if it truly needed more power to keep its pace then it wouldn't be keeping pace with the toy in the water in the first place.
What's happening, as he said, is simply that each stroke the toy takes with the power it would be using in water should be slowed down by the syrup's viscosity, but is instead counteracted by how far the turtle gets pushed due to how easy it is to propel itself through the syrup comparative to water.
Using the same amount of force, it is able to push itself further, but also is slowed down by viscosity, meaning it ultimately ends up the same speed and the same amount of energy used.
@@CyberCactus i thought of this too, but this is a matter of two things here: torque and maximum speed. the torque of the motor is enough to keep the flaps spinning at max speed in the syrup as in water, and since the maximum speed of the motor is the same in both liquids, there is no difference. (It probably also consume more energy, but im not really sure about that, im not very literate in electronics.)
If the motor was not as powerful, you would indeed see the difference in speed, as it would slow down in syrup. in fact it actually did, in the more viscous liquid. the motor's torque was overmatched by the viscosity, as it could barely move its flaps.
@@StickyIckyOOHWAY Well if the toy was merely able to keep itself at max speed in the syrup, but had to pull more power to be able to do so, then it would logically have to be pulling less power from its motor to go the same speed in the water. This would require some kind of cap or limiter to be in place preventing the toy from pushing its little paddles harder than it does while it's in water. Otherwise, it would always use the same power and the same expended energy across liquids. I doubt the little toys he used in the video had any limiter that prevented them from putting the same amount of power into the water as they did into the syrup, and without limitations in water the max speed simply would have been *higher* in the water than it would in the syrup if the syrup were requiring more energy to wade through, due to the paddles having the same power from the motor which results in an easier time moving the paddles in the first place.
I agree that the motor's lack of torque was a major contributor in why it wasn't able to move through the much more viscous liquid at the end. These fluid dynamics are strange but it seems there is simply a point in viscosity in which things stop moving easily, but until that point everything moves the same, like he went over at the end of the video. I'd love to see more demonstrations of the experiments so I can actually understand it better, at the moment admittedly I'm just theorising. You could absolutely be right and I'm missing something but so far I'm still convinced about my energy argument.
If you win in swimming like this, you'll have a sweet victory
😂stop
Shut up
nice one
:3
Go. Show yourself out
I think increasing the viscosity would feel like switching to a bigger gear on a bike - it gets harder to move, but you can move faster by moving your feet (or arms) less, so it has about the same speed either way
This is a fantastic comparison IMO
@@giraffe1219Fantastic indeed.
Which makes me think though (He may have explained it in the video already and I am just too impatient to watch it all) won't there be a certain point where the viscosity is so high that pushing basically becomes so hard it's unachievable, and therefore swimming in water would be faster. Because when you up the gear on a bike, there is a certain point especially at an incline where you just can't physically push against it. Although I assume this video is also talking a little hypothetically, as in, if you had infinite amount of strength to push against the liquid
@@eatyourvegetables1449 Yes, 5:13
What if the swimmers were wearing flippers? That would increase the amount of the liquid they push against, but barely change their form.
Being covered in syrup is the worst part about this.
2) Cover yourself in syrup
3)go to a pool
4)swim
this is a joke
@@ditto-w 3) wait for it to swimming pool
Fuck syrup
Pancake towels would help
Who else clicked on this thinkin he actually swam in syrup
I thought he was gonna swam too
I did 😭
I clicked thinking the thumbnail was nfsw
me
Meh
He asks questions that a child would ask, but since he is an adult he can actually answer them and I love it
Children asl really interesting questions. Society has just learned to shut them down😂
bro just defined being a scientist
@@volayiwola15 Yeah I feel that when you're younger you're usually more curious, and you learn easier too
I also have the I’m thinking shirt lol. I actually got it as a gift
ok??
@@lokimarsh-saidin9493 ok
me too i also got it as a gift
Nice
I got it as a gift as well, from my grandma haha
Once again, I love how you have taken a physics problem, demonstrated the principle, shown the math and peaked my curiosity. Nice work.
I totally agree! His videos are very enticing and once you start you don’t wanna stop! You want answers!
Actually, it *piqued your curiosity.
Piqued - stimulated
Peaked - maximized
Peeked - looked
I disagree
@@BariumCobaltNitrog3n relax... knowing is enough, correcting others' spelling is for busy bodies who have nothing to contribute other than corrections because they are overly critical.
Better than schools istg...
I only clicked on this video to see people swimming in a pool full of syrup. Disappointed.
Same
MYTHBUSTERS FAM
same :(
Same...😔
That seems like a good video for mrbeast
Can we just appreciate that he put his hand in syrup for us
No
no
Nein
yes
No
I think with the more viscous liquids you can swim the same speed but it takes more exertion. The amount of force that you’re able to apply on the syrup is greater than the amount you can apply on the water, but that still means you have to push harder. So with the really viscous syrup, you reached the limit of the amount of force that the turtle could apply so it couldn’t swim as fast. If you had significantly stronger motors it might still be able to swim as fast or only a little slower. It makes no sense that an effect would just disappear outside of a specific range of viscosities. It would have to slowly fade (meaning that the speed slowly decreases) as the viscosity increased.
I agree. The turtle swimming slower is not a property of the liquid but of the turtle system being too highly damped by the syrup. It ain't got the gas!
Exactly, the skin drag vs form drag argument didn't make much sense, your reasoning was what I was thinking as well. As long as the swimming object has enough power to move the propellers/flippers with the same rate, they will move with the same speed.
It's not a matter of the effect disappearing. It's a matter of one of the effects being 'used up'.
When viscosity grows up from water, if you use the SAME amount of strength, while you need more strength to move through the more viscous liquid, more of the strength you used to move actually is applied. But at some point, the increase in strength needed will be higher than the gain from higher efficiency.
Let's add some numbers to it.
Let's say you move at 1km/h if you put in 100 energy in water. You put in 200 energy but because the water is thin, only 100 units of that energy are actually propelling you forward.
Now, you put in 200 energy into a more viscous syrop. Because it's more viscous it takes 150 energy to move at 1km/h in it, BUT thanks to that trait, 150 energy from the 200 you use is also propelling you forward, so you still move at the same speed.
Now, raise the viscosity much higher and you get to a point where to reach a speed of 1km/h you need to provide more than 200 energy, say 210. It doesn't matter that almost all the energy you use is used to proper you forward (it cannot be 100%, as that would be a solid object). You just have to raise the energy to move faster, so for example, you will have to use 212 energy. That's 12 energy more than you could have used in the less viscous liquids.
This is the point made in this video. The moment you raise the viscosity past the stage where the efficiency increases at the same rate as energy requirement, you have no choice but to increase the energy input for the same effect. But if you are comparing your best time in water, you simply CANNOT increase energy input, hence you WILL be slower.
@@bscutajar But they need to input more energy for the same effect, therefore no, you cannot swim at the same speed in a much more viscous fluid as you can in water. You cannot suddenly become stronger simply by swimming in a thicker fluid. If you could, then your time in water would be shortened and you still would have been doing a worse time in the viscous fluid.
You are changing the problem here from a body with a fixed ability, to two separate bodies with different abilities. That's an entirely different experiment, and one that never needed any sort of confirmation as it is absolutely clear that so long as you provide enough energy, an object can move through literally anything at any given speed (below the speed of light, and assuming it can withstand moving through said environment).
"Let's do a small scale test"
* Adds 4 jugs of syrup.
Yep very small scale😂
pretty small compared to a full sized swimming pool
@@j4cinta5 lol
Yea man its like 1/4 of an Olympic swimming pool
And he paid for it. He should just have made it with sugar and water, it would also have been clear instead of brown!
@@retrosnek5016 it's called a joke, jokes are usually not %100 accurate.
*Am I the only one that thought he is crazy enough to actually fill a pool with syrup?*
I also thought the same...he is crazy in doing researches lol😂😂😂
@@nafisaparveen4275 *THANK YOU!*
It would be way too expensive
@@bernhardt1557 yes
Mr.Beast should do it
A plastic straw in a turtle, how ironic...
Lmao
im no brain so i dont get it
That’s not how irony works.... at all
🤣🤣
@ATHARV KAWLE I think he meant that the straw ban didn't really do anything to help the wildlife since that doesn't stop more harmful material like metal from also becoming litter, so the ban is utterly pointless since it's not just plastic rubble killing the turtles
As a swimmer, I can say that these results are true under the assumption that swimmers apply a constant force on the water, and in some ways this is true. But for strokes that rely more on a gliding lotion the added resistance from the water will make a huge difference, not to mention the added stress on ligaments and joints from the higher impact forces. I mean it’s a rotator cuff injury waiting to happen. But for plastic turtles who apply an almost constant force it’ll probably work just fine.
I imagine getting a breath of air in syrup will be challenging...
Me at 3am: sees *title*
Also me: I don't need sleep, I need answers
To be fair that syrup wasn’t very viscous
@@andylines8040 no I guess not but still... Doesn't sound like it should work regardless of the viscosity
I love that you switched the turtle toys between the first and second swim tests.
That eliminates any possibility of power differences changing the results.
I'm glad he did it as well, I was hoping he'd do that just to see if there was any variation
@〆ＥＬＬℹ️🅾️ＴＴ★ wait how is it supposed to be sarcastic?
But as you can see the syrup makes the turtle float more. imo the test is a bit scuffed
@@NubeBuster But I'd guess the same thing would happen for humans? So I guess it should be fine
Everybody: "who thought that he will actually swim in syrup"
Me: that turtle is cute
I want one
The toy or a pet?
copycat
Mythbusters allready did it! Search it up, good episode.
I thought he would actually swim in syrup
I thought my laptop was loading until i realized that its just the design on his shirt
The turtle in the regular water is just a paid actor.
LMFAO I'M DEAD RN
LMFAO I'M DEAD RN
I MFAO I’M DEAD RN
LMAO I’M DEAD RN
LMFAO I'M DEAD RN
Imagine opening your eyes undersyrup...
At least it would be balanced with accidentally swallowing the pool syrup
What if they pee in the pool tho
Actually would the pee rise to the top layer since the syrup is a denser liquid so when you swim at the top its though the pee layer nasty
I hate all 3 of you equally right now
Your welcome
@Somebritishguy™ You oof
Me a Canadian: hey that’s a normal Friday
And I have that box of Serup for 50$ dollars
lake ontario is just syrup
The last few test in the syrup box were unfair since it would have got into the joints
Oh, my internet isn't slow.. It's his shirt lol! xD
Wha?- Sorry, i'm thinking.
Thanks for the likes though... you might as well read my name. Help me win this challenge. Thanks
@@amangill6407you can do it. I believe in you.
@@user-fw1mm3gf5v Haha... you acting sus. xD
@@amangill6407 XD I saw you vent!
But does syrup increase the energy per stroke? It's almost like a gear reduction. The lower the ratio, the more torque you have. Thus less energy needed per turn. Syrup is like this case but the opposite. Need explanation. Halp
My iq is not so high
@@Ryannn1212 it's not your iq is your knowledge
@@vittoriopaonessa bruh
Syrup with not require more energy per stroke... Because if u think about it the speed of movement is the same in both liquids... If it required more energy per stroke then there would have been a reduction in speed as well
If more energy was required then u would have to stroke faster to keep up with the speed in water.... But in the case of the toys shown, the speed of stroking was the same as well as the displacement of the toys
I was one of the "professional" swimmers that participated in this study. It was pretty wild.
The guar gum liquid wasn't sticky, more slimy. There was a big layer of it at the bottom because it was hard to keep it in suspension, as the pumps created turbulence that would have altered the results.
So did the settling out affect the viscosity? Was it actually thinner in the part you swam in?
@@Matthewsala they were closely monitoring the viscosity of the upper portion of the pool in which we were swimming, so I'm sure they achieved the desired test conditions (to whatever extent it could be expected).
The bottom of the pool however, was a gloriously disgusting mass of about 3-6 inches of goo, with a consistency somewhere between papier mache paste and wet boogers.
That’s a pretty cool experience! Did it feel any different other than the sliminess?
Guar gum is one of those things that sound fun to play with, but as soon as you actually do it's just a disgusting mess.
@@robmangeri777 less than I would have thought. Hard to ignore the squish of the guard gum that settled to bottom of the pool between your toes though!
Damn the myth busters nostalgia.. so awesome to see that science and myth busting has found a new home on UA-cam for the new generation
Me- *Swims in syrup*
"You see, I'm something of a scientist myself."
Dhar mann
the difference between screwing around and science is writing it down
"I'm not sure how well a human would do in that."
Well if the Great Molasses Flood of 1919 that killed 21 people is any indication, not well.
Sam onella fan
@@bernhardt1557 Who?
You dont know Sam O'Nella? Nevermind then. Its just that he has a video about it
@@bernhardt1557 is that fucking molasses Jenga?
Don't worry I'm actually a hedgehog
Why is no one talking about the mythbusters episode where they actually swam through syrup
Link?
@@stinksorstonks1498 you can literally just look up "mythbusters swimming in syrup" and you find clips from the episode but here you go ua-cam.com/video/ub82Xb1C8os/v-deo.html
@@midgetconi1811 lmao i was lazy ty
@@midgetconi1811 bro you made me scream “I hate you” so early in the morning 😭
I’m never gonna click on a link again..
@@midgetconi1811 I hate myself I clicked instantly and did not look at the link which I memorized I am sad
We got baited
"The turtle could barely get through that syrup" is my new favorite quote that I'm sure no one has ever said before
2020: Swimming In Syrup Is As Easy As Swimming In Water
2030: Swimming In Blood Is As Easy As Swimming In Water
2040: Swimming in lava is easier than swimming in water and syrup combined
Felt bad so here you go
Felt bad so here you go
@Tia Clapper Brent tv fan I see?
@Tia Clapper Nice
-“This books isn’t very aerodynamic”
Ehrenloses Thumbnail
He said syrup so many times it doesn’t even sound like a word any more
Doesn’t even look like a word anymore
Surup
Me: “let’s read some comments”
Comments: “did anyone else think he was gonna swim in syrup?” “I clicked on this thinking he was gonna swim in syrup” “I wish he had have actually swum in syrup”
Ok
I do be wishing that he swam in da syrup tho
Yup,metoo
“swum”
@@mayam3072 what?
I thought he would swim in syrup , as I saw the thumbnail😂
Those lil guys don’t have to worry about the core strength that keeps them up though
I thought he was actually going to swim in syrup but then i got Jebaited so damn hard
Right 😔
Myth busters did this years ago!!!!
@Somebritishgeezer™ that’s kinda rude
I can imagine How To Basic doing way more.
Swimming in eggs
@@ancovwojak6058 can't forget the toilet water
I hate this guy ....
@@dingdongbubble2221, why? He's awesome!
@@iangabriel5536 IKR its his content , but he waste so much food and money etc .. There are also people dying with hunger . I just dont liked this .
You should retry the experiment with ether or acetone, or some other very low viscosity liquid, to see if something four times less viscous than water has an inverse effect or not.
I was thinking about that too, if that is the case, then I'd be interesting to see what the "ideal" amount of viscosity would be for humans.
I thought so too, but you would probably want to use ethanol or methanol, because acetone would do bad things to the plastic, and ether vapor would do bad things to you (as well as ignite on the slightest excuse).
@@Lucius_Chiaraviglio you can also use a container with a different material
Great thought experiment! I would try an experiment where more of the toy is more submerged. Right now it seems the turtle is staying mostly out of the viscous liquid, so the increase in drag is only experienced by the belly surface. As a swimmer, you aim to go as high as possible, but majority of your body is still underwater. Try a toy submarine!
5:27 When people say syrup, this is what I think of.
XD
XD
XD
A straw....in a turtle...
Well isn’t that ironic
stop
Guys, we need mr beast to actualy do this with a real pool
I agree
Mythbusters did already tho years ago.
Not me expecting him to actually fill a whole pool with syrup and having humans swim in it
Titles video "Swimming In Syrup Is As Easy As Swimming In Water."
Proceeds to prove why it's harder to swim in liquids as viscosity increases.
He said syrup in the title, not viscous liquids in general.
No one:
Spec: "Super-weighted butterfly"
Here for that only comment
imagine having to wash off not from chorine but smelling like a pancake house resteraunt
On the long run would it make the swimmer more tired to swim in a more viscous liquid or not
I'd say no as the turtle traveled at the same speed. If pushing was harder (and therefore more tyring) it would have gone slower as it can only push at one speed.
There’s an optimal viscosity that allows more of your limb energy to transfer into forward movement. Each person's own swimming strength would determine how viscous that is.
@@beady0081
I assume it would matter how viscous the fluid was.
The turtle in pure syrup didn’t produce enough force to move through it hardly at all, but I wonder how a human would faire?
The turtle is obviously a mechanical toy meant to move through water. A human can adapt. Maybe swimming normally through pure syrup doesn’t work as well but you can adjust your technique to compensate in some other way. Who knows. I don’t think humans are going to value swimming through syrup enough to master the art lol
I'm curious about the university experiment - did the swimmers tire out more quickly in the syrup than water?
Probably yes. But they were professionals so they managed to do it in time
How does one get tired swimming in sugar?
@@moonlight5889 They also timed lay swimmers.
We didn't swim long enough to really tire out, and we rested a lot between repeats. Also, we randomly switched between the thickened and control pools to make sure cumulative fatigue wouldn't be an issue.
Ha - hey Brian, been a long time!
I'll second what he said, it really wasn't tiring - swims were too short with too much rest in between to get tired.
2:05 When you hit shift to start a word, but have caps lock on
I'm surprised there aren't ants everywhere
I appreciate that you actually tried an experiment with really thick syrup. It always bugged me when they did this on Mythbusters that the syrup they used looked so thin, because I was sure that making the syrup seriously thick would have a noticeably different result, which is exactly what we see here.
That said, I am extremely disappointed that there was no full-scale experiment.
“Sirup” Idk why that annoyed me so much 😂
Right!? I hear that a lot, doesn't make any sense to a non-native english speaker. "Sir up"🤦♂️
As a native English speaker, this irritates me as well. Me and everyone around me pronounces it like "Seer-rup”
@@dotmatrixmoe at least he didnt say sigh rupe
Cry about it
That's what I call it lol
These turtles combined with that paddling sound is just so adorable
Everybody: he had us in the whole video ngl
I expected people swimming in syrup. Nice thumbnail
So what you're telling me is that I CANT swim through concrete.
I loved when The Mythbusters did this
My physics and swimming teacher needs to see this
Lol
The Mythbusters already tested this in 2009. Episode 118. It was PLAUSIBLE
Adam and Jamie began by digging two long trenches and lining them with plastic sheeting to serve as swimming pools. They filled one with water and the other with high-viscosity syrup made from 750 pounds (340 kg) of guar gum and 10,000 US gallons (38,000 L) of water. Adam and Jamie each swam three lengths in the water to establish their average times, then did the same in the syrup. Adam’s time in syrup was 28% slower than in water; Jamie tired quickly and withdrew from further testing. They also performed tests with other syrup formulas with lower viscosity. Adam again swam three lengths in each pool and found that his syrup time was now only 2.8% to 5.4% slower than in water. Next, they invited Olympic gold medalist swimmer Nathan Adrian swim through each substance. Nathan’s times were erratic because his technique was so highly honed for pure water, and his results were thrown out. Based on the results for light and medium syrup, which they considered to be within the margin of error for their testing method, Adam and Jamie declared the myth plausible.
With syrup you have almost a grip, it puts more resistance on your body allowing you to almost grab onto something and physically push off of it while swimming. Granted the viscosity of syrup is way higher than water, but they both have liquid properties. Both are swimmable and both can be traveled in.
That shirt gives me anxiety... keep thinking that the video was loading lmfao.
His shirt is lying
You're approaching the Mr Beast level. Maybe next year you could do this in a swimming pool?
Me: thought that he will actually swim in pool made of syrup
Also Me: my disappoint is immeasurable and my day is ruined.
Same
I don’t know if you going to read this or not, but I wanted to say that I really love your work and keep going ☺️
I was came here to see someone swim in syrup. Nobody swam in syrup
The turtle also took longer in the thick syrup because its movement range is just rotating and the shape of the wing is a spoon, so it had a hardtime rotating under the syrup
2:37 he knew what he was doing with this ms in the corner
What do you mean? Or what does it mean
@@unknownpjh1401 420
Because he controlled exactly how long it took for the ball to fall.
Don’t woosh me, I get the joke, but it’s stupid.
Is this even a joke ? What does this mean
I would have liked to see also the effect of liquid density in the mix. If a denser liquid is also more viscous, the added buoyancy can help you a lot by keeping you perfectly horizontal and partly out of the water, while a not-so-good swimmer will be too submerged to swim efficiently.
"Geoff, come see this! You were right, we can make him do anything." - Authors of the research paper
To anyone who thinks waters isn’t wet, watch the first thirty seconds of this video. Water is less dense molecularly and such you ‘slip’ through it just like if you were to hydroplane on something wet.
Your shirt even though its a still image in my head its playing a loading animation lol, cool shirt!
Same
Me watching him pour 4 bottles of syrup into a tub: what a waste
Nah homie he drenched his pancakes in it
2:38
Mad respect for the syrup for giving us a funny number 😆😆😆
@Tia Clapper it was 420 the 2nd funny number hahahahahaha 😆😆😆
i was just about to say that lol
@@AtLeastThreeCharacters. oof sry 💀
But in the long-run, the syrup while make the person tired more quickly, leading to reduced speed.
I thought you will swim in a big pool of syrup
You’re going to need a lot of pancakes to take care of all that syrup
Imagine sinking in this and thinking that this is the end I’m dieing in syrup
Someone going to their local grocery store: "damn, they're all out of syrup.. Now what will i put on my pancakes"
Water duh
Let’s take time to appreciate that he put his hand in syrup for us
No, I didn't.
I’m disappointed to not see someone swim in a pool of syrup 😕
@@kluup1081 lowkey want to see it tho , would they could wear that oxygen tank that puts air in ur face
But why?
*_Just why_*
'cause he can, duh
idk xD
Why not?
Please tell me I wasn’t the only one shocked at first by this thumbnail 😭
I Don't Know I Would Swim Or Not But I Am Sure I Am Gonna Drink It 😂.....
Nobody:
Literally nobody:
Canadians: I swim in maple syrup.
In peripheral vision the shirt looks like its moving
All you needed to do was ask a Canadian, they swim in ice lakes and syrup all the time, they'll tell you.
I used to have thos little turtles! I let mine go in a lake...... I never got it back 🥺
He swam home🌏🙏🐢
*Fun Fact* :
You produce enough saliva in a year to fill two bathtubs !!
~ Facts by Curious JB
I know
That’s it?
but how many oceans can you fill with saliva in 1234.56789 years? that's the real question.
I'm curious to know what should be the optimal viscosity of a liquid to swim in it?
Around 2x the viscosity of water is what I tested and what they used in the study
Good question! At some point, the drag will be too high for muscles to take advantage. 4x at the end of the video for the turtles.
@@TheActionLab Turtles here swim ON syrup not IN syrup. Surface area in liquid matters.
"The turtle could barely get through that syrup" is a great sentence