Shear and Moment Diagrams of a Frame with Angled Member (Part 1) - Structural Analysis

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 20 вер 2024
  • This video is part 1 for the structural analysis of a statically determinate frame with an angled member. The analysis involves the following:
    1) Evaluating the determinacy of the structure
    2) Calculating support reactions
    3) Joint Equilibrium
    4) Drawing internal axial, shear, and moment diagrams for each member of the frame.
    Part 2: • Shear and Moment Diagr...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 43

  • @roger72715
    @roger72715 4 роки тому +6

    Such fun I had watching your videos. You explain with clarity and a midas touch

  • @abdulazizalrashidi1168
    @abdulazizalrashidi1168 2 роки тому +3

    (14:11) I think -1.333 cos theta should've been 4/5 in this case, and 6.556 sin theta be 3/5

  • @harveyabordo4491
    @harveyabordo4491 4 роки тому +1

    I love the enthusiasm!

  • @MuhammadAbdulah-z3t
    @MuhammadAbdulah-z3t 7 місяців тому +1

    I have one query, at the start of video while solving horizontal forces you took Dx as 6.667 pointing left but when solved for Bx you got -6.667 answer and you wrote is towards right rather than towards left ! Kindly explain..

    • @callmeempire-7933
      @callmeempire-7933 6 місяців тому +1

      That was his falt i think , i also realized this point

  • @spark5989
    @spark5989 4 роки тому +4

    How would you analyse the support reactions when the A and D pins are not on the same y displacement, ie D is positioned higher than A. One of my civil engineering assignment question questions is super similar to this one only with the problem i just mentioned.

  • @sunday-dz5mb
    @sunday-dz5mb 25 днів тому

    Sir i'm a bit confused as to why you didn't consider the reactions at fixed support C into the fbd?

  • @eesaarashid1954
    @eesaarashid1954 3 роки тому +1

    thank you very well explained and I fully understand this now

  • @naalainmuhammad7680
    @naalainmuhammad7680 3 роки тому +3

    Can someone please recommend me more videos regarding the structural analysis of frames ??(Civil Engineering). I will be very thankful to you.

  • @Aeudar
    @Aeudar 5 місяців тому

    thank you, very clear and pinpoint

  • @davidj4550
    @davidj4550 4 роки тому +1

    Nice for Static’s and Structural analysis

  • @burakkarabulut3440
    @burakkarabulut3440 4 роки тому +3

    Could you let me know which program you use while making your drawings in these videos? By the way the videos are perfect!

    • @structurefree
      @structurefree  4 роки тому +1

      lately i've been using microsoft whiteboard and onenote.

  • @jrow96
    @jrow96 3 роки тому +3

    8:12 thought X would be 3/5 and Y would be 4/5 for your cos(theta)

  • @АннаКуницкая-х7й
    @АннаКуницкая-х7й 4 роки тому

    why at the inclined beam we don't consider By and Bx at the opposite side?

  • @faithbalines7213
    @faithbalines7213 4 роки тому +2

    How do you analyze how many equations will be set per body diagram?

    • @structurefree
      @structurefree  4 роки тому

      In 2-d, if you cut something out of your structure joint, member, portion of a member, etc. there are three equilibrium equations that you can use per cut out.

  • @ahmadjaber957
    @ahmadjaber957 4 роки тому

    thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you

  • @Sibasish07
    @Sibasish07 3 роки тому +1

    I feel making sections is a much less complicated way of solving for internal actions. However good video.

  • @crizelg2205
    @crizelg2205 11 місяців тому +1

    thankyouuu so muchh

  • @sidneysevilla2405
    @sidneysevilla2405 2 роки тому +1

    Hey structure free how come u didn’t consider the distributed load when u was looking for your VA NA at joint A?

    • @structurefree
      @structurefree  2 роки тому +2

      It's because the cut is just before the distributed load and we are isolating the joint.

    • @laff4lindah55
      @laff4lindah55 2 роки тому

      @@structurefree thank you

  • @markaldrindelacruz8338
    @markaldrindelacruz8338 3 роки тому

    The solution for this is the same with no hinge?

  • @doolomer8873
    @doolomer8873 4 роки тому +1

    Waiting the bell thsks dear Prof

  • @nasserowaid8774
    @nasserowaid8774 2 роки тому

    Why did you assume Dx direction to right direction?why not assume it as opposite direction?

    • @structurefree
      @structurefree  2 роки тому +1

      I usually assume my sorry reactions are in the globally positive coordinate direction. Although, you can guess whichever way that you want.

  • @hibariadh9485
    @hibariadh9485 3 роки тому +1

    goooood job❤

  • @donncarylcabase3949
    @donncarylcabase3949 4 роки тому

    hello, why on summation of forces X, use sin theta? should it be cos theta?

    • @harvingwapo
      @harvingwapo 3 роки тому

      is that for the summation of forces along horizontal at AB? that is because theta is with respect to y-axis. If you have a right triangle with an angle theta with respect to x-axis and you draw a line perpendicular to the hypotenuse, the measurement of the angle between the y-axis and the line perpendicular to the hypotenuse is equal to theta.

  • @lorencampos3773
    @lorencampos3773 3 роки тому

    Isn't this structure unstable? Just by inspection

  • @Ali-cb3xt
    @Ali-cb3xt 4 роки тому

    what's the ended value in moment ? (after 6.25)

    • @Aeudar
      @Aeudar 5 місяців тому

      0

  • @roger72715
    @roger72715 4 роки тому

    When's the part 2 coming?

    • @structurefree
      @structurefree  4 роки тому

      ua-cam.com/video/mdkZ2FM5LCQ/v-deo.html
      There's also a link in the description.

  • @daoudyadji-hansen9298
    @daoudyadji-hansen9298 3 роки тому +1

    i like you man add me on club penguin

    • @structurefree
      @structurefree  3 роки тому

      I like you too, but I don't even know what club penguin is... I'm more club batman.

  • @emediongumoh4335
    @emediongumoh4335 Рік тому +1

    Not very comprehensive