Attorney You can win this easily for the veteran to keep his Clearance. Although it depends on his injuries too. If they approved his rating before they decided to take go after his clearance then this is a technicality. And you probably already know the VA laws. The VA is misperceived by the public. The Department of Veterans Affairs is not about benefits. Benefits means in addition too. When veterans wind up in the VA initially there is not an addition too. The Department of Veterans Affairs is compensation for loss or losses however they may come that are service connected or combat related service connected. Now they approved this veteran’s rating before they decided to go after his clearance. This is a screw up by the VA but it depends on what the injuries are. Attorney this issue not only affects this veteran but the veteran community overall. I believe this issue should make its way to the Supreme Court. Here is why. For example: why does a veteran have to be in the state of being of death due you part to be compensated for loss? Take a look at the 38CFR. When a veteran is enrolled in the GI Bill per se or chapter 31 VR&E, the veteran is responsible for successfully completing their programs. Of course this is why the veterans are there. But what if external barriers are induced intentionally to prevent the veterans from succeeding? And the barriers were not their own barriers? Well before the VA will pay for the academic classes the Veterans have to receive “F” grades. Attorney do you realize how devastating this is particularly if the optics were not actually the true performance of the veterans. The veterans would be thrown out of the universities period. Plus they this would make it difficult for them to get jobs. The VA is a total loss agency. The VA is not about positive outcomes. Now in the middle to late nineties the VA was more success oriented and veteran centric than today. I mean the VA truly used to invest in the veterans. And I am referring to VISN 1. I mean true success stories. If you look at people who have had successful surgeries in relation to prosthetics, they might could resume careers. People who have been diagnosed with cancer well the cancer could go into remission. They too might could resume careers. Even some people who have had histories similar to the people in the state hospitals who became actual successes from the hole they were in initially. One person who had this similar path was Rosanne Barr. Veterans are treated as second class citizens. There needs to be a better way to compensate for loss that gives the hand up than to just keep the veteran compromised. Some veterans are compromised so initially that they are not retrainable and cannot work initially when they are placed into the VA. However what happens during the veterans progress that will facilitate forward improvement from that point on depends on a number of factors. However the veterans who are initially established with total loss are kept in this position. This is unconstitutional and against civil rights and against the ADA and against human rights. However the whole western health care system is a total loss system. It is not just the VA. Insurance Companies malfeasance deliverables that have been directed by the government against the people. Attorney here is the difference between the military and the VA with how different actions are being taken against the veteran. The military does not pay regular military salaries for poor quality. Although the military might cause the poor quality via combat or non combat injuries or adverse deliverables that will leave the military member not remaining in the quality position. Therefore the military member will have to be retired. However if the VA blocks the veterans from moving forward this will keep the veterans at the initial decisions that were made when the veterans were in that loss state of being. The VA in today just pays compensation for loss not return to health and recovery and investment in veterans lives. The VA modality is not pro life. This needs to change.
I have one last comment. You are correct about not representing oneself. However it is hard to find attorneys who know VA law and military law. Most attorneys out here only just do appeals for veterans if they have been denied. A result of this just makes it one sided.
Attorney you made the comment when I had listened earlier about how the military did not take his clearance during the fifteen years. Here is why. He was serving on active duty. In my opinion the two words active duty mean exactly how they are spelled. Active duty does not mean total loss or loss. Military active duty is the opposite of the VA which = loss. This is why. The VA only functions in the BLACK. This is it. This is why the medical intentional errors and the over medicated and the denials. This is why they are going after the veteran’s clearance. This has nothing to do with DUI allegations. There are plenty of people who are working in high up leadership positions who have engaged in worse behavior than the alcohol. How about medical marijuana? How are the companies and the government in favor of medical marijuana with having legalized it in some states? Some companies allow employees to use medical marijuana while working full time and they allow the employees to remain in the revolving door of the EAP program. What is the difference? One makes money and the other doesn’t. Anyway I shifted off the topic. Good luck! You will succeed on this case in my opinion. There are other reasons too. They do not deny clearances because of alcohol. They don’t. It depends on if the military member is a loss in the way of a total loss of health. Alcohol does not equal total loss. There would have to be an underlying other reason. I mean a reason to where the veteran was not coming back around anytime soon.
It is going to cost them more money in the long run if they take away his clearance and have to provide him with training in another field than if they allow him keep his clearance and let him work if he can.
US Captain years later stated such actions should not have happened for medical reasons at that time I am not in the past but it can effect today because only one side was ever known
Attorney after paying attention to your successes, you are actually a ProLife and ProRight, and ProSuccess law professional. This issue about the veterans’ clearance is not about necessarily alcohol. “This is a ProLife issue.” Here is how: To enter the VA the veterans are compromised in some way or many ways. The VA does not stop with just being marginally compromised their modality is full control of the veterans. The VA is not ProLife and is not pro-health and is not pro recovery. The VA stays funded by keeping veterans compromised which is not in line with the US Constitution. Veterans have rights and this veteran should not lose his security clearance. The VA is asserting more overreach to totally destabilize the veteran. Attorney this is an important issue. In order to improve the VA the modality needs to be reversed into the Pro-Life direction. What does this mean? The veteran not losing his clearance with providing him the hand up not stripping him down. There is a rabbit hole into how this veteran is being treated. Please fight for this veteran too keep his clearance. I have more to say about this issue because it applies to the whole healthcare delivery not just the VA. I will continue but you probably already know this information that is happening in society.
Has nothing to with the DUI. The VA is a government workman’s compensation agency. Now if he is injured or whatever is going on he will not be able to work and it depends on the severity. However it is not even about this. It is about money. If he has a hundred percent then he is not able to work in the same job he did in the military. So the way they look at it him having his clearance signifies he can do the job in the military. However when a military member is discharged from the military the military member is debriefed. Actually if he is out of the military that clearance would no longer be applicable anyway unless he is able to work. The situation with my clearance had nothing to do with the VA. The revocation of my clearance happened long before the medical board was signed and finalized and happened before I had the hearing at Bethesda Hospital trying to stay in. My clearance was revoked at the command before I was transferred to the Navy Hospital. At the command I was being treated by civilian hospital and civilian doctors because there was not federal military care nearby. So my clearance was revoked before anything else was even decided which left me totally without and with the state of being that the situation that happened left me in. So without the clearance the veteran is not employable in the same job he did in the military. It is strange that the clearance is being removed after all the other has been approved. Everything was collapsed in my situation before it ever reached the VA. I believe they need to change the laws surrounding this situation. I was without clearance but I was too sick anyway so they could not retrain me either at that time. And for a veteran to be unemployable with how the laws are written they have to have lost many jobs. But what about the veteran who cannot get a job to hold a job to lose a job well the veteran is unemployable for that screenshot of time. You never know what will happen. The VA cannot predict anything even though they try to control everything so they can leverage their outcome. If the veteran doesn’t have a clearance maybe they can retrain him in something else. Depends on his health actually. However if he cannot be retrained and he cannot work then I guess the other is SSA. Like I have mentioned it strange how the clearance is the last thing they are looking at. My situation surely was not like this. I believe though some of their laws maybe need to be updated or amended. Finally though what they are going on is the VA js a government workman’s compensation agency for the military. So if he keeps the clearance from the way they look at it is he would need to go back in the military and he can’t. So why can’t he use his clearance out here? Companies need employees with those type clearances. It is strange how they seem to be getting in his way of holding employment. I see the double standard here. I do not mean to bring this up but I will. Former Senator John McCain was 100% PNT and the VA never bothered him and he never went to the VA.
No does not apply to me Situation happened many years ago and Commander Naval Security Activity SSO yes probably Ft. Meade or Laurel Maryland. Revoked but was to injured at that time to appeal But all that stuff affects today particularly when it was not the truth
You always present valuable informative information.
Attorney
You can win this easily for the veteran to keep his Clearance. Although it depends on his injuries too. If they approved his rating before they decided to take go after his clearance then this is a technicality. And you probably already know the VA laws. The VA is misperceived by the public. The Department of Veterans Affairs is not about benefits. Benefits means in addition too. When veterans wind up in the VA initially there is not an addition too. The Department of Veterans Affairs is compensation for loss or losses however they may come that are service connected or combat related service connected. Now they approved this veteran’s rating before they decided to go after his clearance. This is a screw up by the VA but it depends on what the injuries are. Attorney this issue not only affects this veteran but the veteran community overall. I believe this issue should make its way to the Supreme Court. Here is why. For example: why does a veteran have to be in the state of being of death due you part to be compensated for loss? Take a look at the 38CFR.
When a veteran is enrolled in the GI Bill per se or chapter 31 VR&E, the veteran is responsible for successfully completing their programs. Of course this is why the veterans are there. But what if external barriers are induced intentionally to prevent the veterans from succeeding? And the barriers were not their own barriers? Well before the VA will pay for the academic classes the Veterans have to receive “F” grades. Attorney do you realize how devastating this is particularly if the optics were not actually the true performance of the veterans. The veterans would be thrown out of the universities period. Plus they this would make it difficult for them to get jobs. The VA is a total loss agency. The VA is not about positive outcomes. Now in the middle to late nineties the VA was more success oriented and veteran centric than today. I mean the VA truly used to invest in the veterans. And I am referring to VISN 1. I mean true success stories. If you look at people who have had successful surgeries in relation to prosthetics, they might could resume careers. People who have been diagnosed with cancer well the cancer could go into remission. They too might could resume careers. Even some people who have had histories similar to the people in the state hospitals who became actual successes from the hole they were in initially. One person who had this similar path was Rosanne Barr. Veterans are treated as second class citizens. There needs to be a better way to compensate for loss that gives the hand up than to just keep the veteran compromised. Some veterans are compromised so initially that they are not retrainable and cannot work initially when they are placed into the VA. However what happens during the veterans progress that will facilitate forward improvement from that point on depends on a number of factors. However the veterans who are initially established with total loss are kept in this position. This is unconstitutional and against civil rights and against the ADA and against human rights. However the whole western health care system is a total loss system. It is not just the VA. Insurance Companies malfeasance deliverables that have been directed by the government against the people. Attorney here is the difference between the military and the VA with how different actions are being taken against the veteran. The military does not pay regular military salaries for poor quality. Although the military might cause the poor quality via combat or non combat injuries or adverse deliverables that will leave the military member not remaining in the quality position. Therefore the military member will have to be retired. However if the VA blocks the veterans from moving forward this will keep the veterans at the initial decisions that were made when the veterans were in that loss state of being. The VA in today just pays compensation for loss not return to health and recovery and investment in veterans lives. The VA modality is not pro life. This needs to change.
I have one last comment. You are correct about not representing oneself. However it is hard to find attorneys who know VA law and military law. Most attorneys out here only just do appeals for veterans if they have been denied. A result of this just makes it one sided.
Thanks for your email. Sorry for the confusion.
Attorney you made the comment when I had listened earlier about how the military did not take his clearance during the fifteen years. Here is why. He was serving on active duty. In my opinion the two words active duty mean exactly how they are spelled. Active duty does not mean total loss or loss.
Military active duty is the opposite of the VA which = loss. This is why.
The VA only functions in the BLACK. This is it. This is why the medical intentional errors and the over medicated and the denials. This is why they are going after the veteran’s clearance. This has nothing to do with DUI allegations. There are plenty of people who are working in high up leadership positions who have engaged in worse behavior than the alcohol. How about medical marijuana? How are the companies and the government in favor of medical marijuana with having legalized it in some states? Some companies allow employees to use medical marijuana while working full time and they allow the employees to remain in the revolving door of the EAP program. What is the difference? One makes money and the other doesn’t. Anyway I shifted off the topic. Good luck! You will succeed on this case in my opinion. There are other reasons too. They do not deny clearances because of alcohol. They don’t. It depends on if the military member is a loss in the way of a total loss of health. Alcohol does not equal total loss. There would have to be an underlying other reason. I mean a reason to where the veteran was not coming back around anytime soon.
It is going to cost them more money in the long run if they take away his clearance and have to provide him with training in another field than if they allow him keep his clearance and let him work if he can.
US Captain years later stated such actions should not have happened for medical reasons at that time
I am not in the past but it can effect today because only one side was ever known
How can the VA do this to that veteran? This is not the under the VA’s jurisdiction.
Attorney
after paying attention to your successes, you are actually a ProLife and ProRight, and ProSuccess law professional.
This issue about the veterans’ clearance is not about necessarily alcohol.
“This is a ProLife issue.”
Here is how: To enter the VA the veterans are compromised in some way or many ways. The VA does not stop with just being marginally compromised their modality is full control of the veterans.
The VA is not ProLife and is not pro-health and is not pro recovery.
The VA stays funded by keeping veterans compromised which is not in line with the US Constitution.
Veterans have rights and this veteran should not lose his security clearance.
The VA is asserting more overreach to totally destabilize the veteran.
Attorney this is an important issue.
In order to improve the VA the modality needs to be reversed into the Pro-Life direction.
What does this mean?
The veteran not losing his clearance with providing him the hand up not stripping him down.
There is a rabbit hole into how this veteran is being treated.
Please fight for this veteran too keep his clearance.
I have more to say about this issue because it applies to the whole healthcare delivery not just the VA.
I will continue but you probably already know this information that is happening in society.
Has nothing to with the DUI. The VA is a government workman’s compensation agency. Now if he is injured or whatever is going on he will not be able to work and it depends on the severity.
However it is not even about this. It is about money. If he has a hundred percent then he is not able to work in the same job he did in the military. So the way they look at it him having his clearance signifies he can do the job in the military. However when a military member is discharged from the military the military member is debriefed. Actually if he is out of the military that clearance would no longer be applicable anyway unless he is able to work. The situation with my clearance had nothing to do with the VA. The revocation of my clearance happened long before the medical board was signed and finalized and happened before I had the hearing at Bethesda Hospital trying to stay in. My clearance was revoked at the command before I was transferred to the Navy Hospital. At the command I was being treated by civilian hospital and civilian doctors because there was not federal military care nearby. So my clearance was revoked before anything else was even decided which left me totally without and with the state of being that the situation that happened left me in. So without the clearance the veteran is not employable in the same job he did in the military. It is strange that the clearance is being removed after all the other has been approved. Everything was collapsed in my situation before it ever reached the VA. I believe they need to change the laws surrounding this
situation. I was without clearance but I was too sick anyway so they could not retrain me either at that time. And for a veteran to be unemployable with how the laws are written they have to have lost many jobs. But what about the veteran who cannot get a job to hold a job to lose a job well the veteran is unemployable for that screenshot of time. You never know what will happen. The VA cannot predict anything even though they try to control everything so they can leverage their outcome. If the veteran doesn’t have a clearance maybe they can retrain him in something else. Depends on his health actually. However if he cannot be retrained and he cannot work then I guess the other is SSA.
Like I have mentioned it strange how the clearance is the last thing they are looking at. My situation surely was not like this. I believe though some of their laws maybe need to be updated or amended. Finally though what they are going on is the VA js a government workman’s compensation agency for the military. So if he keeps the clearance from the way they look at it is he would need to go back in the military and he can’t. So why can’t he use his clearance out here? Companies need employees with those type clearances. It is strange how they seem to be getting in his way of holding employment. I see the double standard here. I do not mean to bring this up but I will. Former Senator John McCain was 100% PNT and the VA never bothered him and he never went to the VA.
No DUI on active duty
No does not apply to me
Situation happened many years ago and Commander Naval Security Activity SSO yes probably Ft. Meade or Laurel Maryland.
Revoked but was to injured at that time to appeal
But all that stuff affects today particularly when it was not the truth
Terrible
Terrible