No State religion. No endorsement of religion by the state. No using tax dollars for State endorsed religion. Separation of Church and State. How hard is that to understand?
@@valuedCustomer2929Turn that around on yourself buddy! It’s you disgusting Christians that openly want theocracy that fail to understand the constitution!
@@valuedCustomer2929 Establishment clause prevents Congress from creating a law respecting any religion. Due process clause make constitutional congressional restrictions of the first 8 amendments applicable to state and local governments. Hence separation of congress and state become separation of church and state thanks to the 14 amendment.
Charter schools, by statute, are public schools. A religious public school is an oxymoron. A principle of religious liberty is my tax dollars should never be used to advance religious beliefs I find abhorrent. The same is true for each of us.
No, there is no such thing as a religiously neutral public school, the idea of a school is necessarily value laden. Separation of church and state is a philosophically incoherent concept even if it is enshrined in US law, and can be interpreted to mean almost anything depending on who is in power. In a democracy if you are in the minority on any potential use of tax dollars you still have to pay for it even if you find it abhorrent.
It's unamerican though. If you endorce one religion, then all are able to be publically endorced. Are you ready to start funding a muslim school with your tax dollars? I wouldn't think so. It's either ALL or NONE.
@@apersonontheinternet8354 You don't know history and I dont blame you because our education system in the West has a secular bias. Nearly every bill presented by the founding members of our government quoted scripture. It's the bedrock or western civilization.
No State religion. No endorsement of religion by the state. No using tax dollars for State endorsed religion. Separation of Church and State. How hard is that to understand?
Tell me you don't understand the Constitution without telling me you don't understand the Constitution
@@valuedCustomer2929Turn that around on yourself buddy! It’s you disgusting Christians that openly want theocracy that fail to understand the constitution!
@@valuedCustomer2929 Establishment clause prevents Congress from creating a law respecting any religion. Due process clause make constitutional congressional restrictions of the first 8 amendments applicable to state and local governments. Hence separation of congress and state become separation of church and state thanks to the 14 amendment.
God will prevail over govt
Echoing exactly what the taliban says
@@kristapsbogdanovs2366 God yea but not the Catholic Church.
Talk about history repeating itself.
St ISADOR , THE LABORER
PUT GOD FIRST BY PRAYING
BEFORE AND DURING WORKING
No support for religious svhoo!!I I am tired of paying for churches I should not have to. Churches should pay taxes on their income!
You’re not discriminating against religion. You’re forcing taxpayer to fund a religion they themselves don’t belong to.
Must have been the wrong version of christstainism for scRotus to allow!
you think so? In a strongly anti-Catholic area no chance of that.
@@timcooper1321 it WAS a _publically funded_ *catholic* charter school that was shot down
Why are you giving time to this right wing theocrat? Where is the other side of the story?
Harmony public schools in Texas and Gülen movement schools are allowed. What's different?
@@GuitarDaddio taxpayer money that is the difference
@@newjerseylion4804 Harmony gets public money.
Charter schools, by statute, are public schools.
A religious public school is an oxymoron.
A principle of religious liberty is my tax dollars should never be used to advance religious beliefs I find abhorrent. The same is true for each of us.
No, there is no such thing as a religiously neutral public school, the idea of a school is necessarily value laden. Separation of church and state is a philosophically incoherent concept even if it is enshrined in US law, and can be interpreted to mean almost anything depending on who is in power. In a democracy if you are in the minority on any potential use of tax dollars you still have to pay for it even if you find it abhorrent.
Government is not greater than God.
LORD PLEASE bring this to the US Supreme Court! My man Clarence Thomas is going to be true to the Lord
It's unamerican though. If you endorce one religion, then all are able to be publically endorced. Are you ready to start funding a muslim school with your tax dollars? I wouldn't think so. It's either ALL or NONE.
@@apersonontheinternet8354 You don't know history and I dont blame you because our education system in the West has a secular bias. Nearly every bill presented by the founding members of our government quoted scripture. It's the bedrock or western civilization.
@@apersonontheinternet8354 false
@@apersonontheinternet8354nonsense
@@valuedCustomer2929 he is too busy taking bribes.