Yes I think you are correct with the prediction . Some people are more equal than other’s when they have lots of money to pay for it it makes a joke of the Law!!
Respectfully my friend, your level of knowledge regarding law, is insufficient to advance your ideas here. For example, you referred to "...former president Trump versus the law". In this instance, you show a lack of ability to even identify a legal proceeding in an objective manner. What it shows is that you lack the basic awareness of the manner in which a legal fact is objectively identified. Lacking even this most rudimentary knowledge, you sally forth like a sailing ship without a rudder. Furthermore, your claims are merely your personal opinions, and you are unsware by all appearances, of the distinction between knowledge (Greek EPISTEME) and opinion (Greek DOXA). Thus armed, your efforts to inform are more akin to Don Quixote charging windmills than they are informed positions regarding a legal proceeding. Your technological information is much better. Your political advocacy is of a lesser standard.
Hi Bruce, I am glad to see I have again annoyed you into writing a long, verbose paragraph to display your "legal" knowledge. Apparently, I have hit the nail on the head once again. Anyone who has observed the legal process can see that its application is not equitable. Can you possibly deny that a public defender cannot provide the same level of defense as a team of highly paid attorneys? Really, Bruce, let's get real!
i want to know about hunters laptop
I love Mr. Dillin
Yes I think you are correct with the prediction .
Some people are more equal than other’s when they have lots of money to pay for it it makes a joke of the Law!!
Respectfully my friend, your level of knowledge regarding law, is insufficient to advance your ideas here. For example, you referred to "...former president Trump versus the law".
In this instance, you show a lack of ability to even identify a legal proceeding in an objective manner. What it shows is that you lack the basic awareness of the manner in which a legal fact is objectively identified.
Lacking even this most rudimentary knowledge, you sally forth like a sailing ship without a rudder. Furthermore, your claims are merely your personal opinions, and you are unsware by all appearances, of the distinction between knowledge (Greek EPISTEME) and opinion (Greek DOXA). Thus armed, your efforts to inform are more akin to Don Quixote charging windmills than they are informed positions regarding a legal proceeding. Your technological information is much better. Your political advocacy is of a lesser standard.
Hi Bruce,
I am glad to see I have again annoyed you into writing a long, verbose paragraph to display your "legal" knowledge. Apparently, I have hit the nail on the head once again. Anyone who has observed the legal process can see that its application is not equitable. Can you possibly deny that a public defender cannot provide the same level of defense as a team of highly paid attorneys? Really, Bruce, let's get real!
I enjoy your electronics projects but not your fool hearty sick leftist politics.
True