'It said all of these things you can't use your money on,' | ICCU releases new terms and conditions

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 7 лип 2024
  • A woman stopped and read the new terms and conditions from ICCU and decided she did have a choice after seeing things she disagreed with.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 2 тис.

  • @ColinAverill
    @ColinAverill 29 днів тому +1467

    Ahh yes, the old "the customers are confused" gaslighting technique. I hope everybody drops them.

    • @v3rlon
      @v3rlon 29 днів тому +118

      Yeah. We didn’t mean exactly what we said. We would never actually enforce the policy we wrote in plain English and ran through our legal team through multiple drafts. We are very sorry someone actually read this and used it against us before we could use it against them.

    • @jnorman58
      @jnorman58 29 днів тому +43

      Yeah, what a ridiculous non-responsive comment from ICCU. My assumption on things like child support and taxes is that ICCU doesn’t want the liability for consequences if a payment doesn’t go thru. We just paid IRS for our quarterly tax deposit last month from ICCU, but it was done via the IRS system where they then ACH the account, rather than initiating the payment via ICCU. If that’s the cas, why don’t they just say so? And who approved the original language, and have they been fired yet. Watching this closely as we have out account there.

    • @septembersurprise5178
      @septembersurprise5178 29 днів тому +14

      @@jnorman58 "To succeed in other trades, capacity must be shown; in the law, concealment of it will do."
      - Mark Twain

    • @chriskirk9708
      @chriskirk9708 28 днів тому +20

      In other words, "y'all caught us"

    • @kensmith5429
      @kensmith5429 28 днів тому

      @@chriskirk9708 but we don't care we're going to do it anyways and you'll be shopping at the gov't approved store with your new credits that will affect your social credit score. It's a soft approach to get everyone who thinks they need money to comply to them

  • @orion2250
    @orion2250 29 днів тому +1560

    A credit union with no members is no longer viable.cancel that CU.

    • @veramae4098
      @veramae4098 29 днів тому

      Looks look social overreach.
      Not sending money to a Ponzi scheme? OK, good idea, but how do they know what company is actually a Ponzi scheme?

    • @AzBansheez
      @AzBansheez 28 днів тому +50

      This is nothing, wait until they require a "mark" of approval just to buy food. Don't worry, it's coming.

    • @MamaMOB
      @MamaMOB 28 днів тому +14

      Any bank can do this. Any money lender can do this. If you give your money to a financial institution that's exactly what you've done. Given it to them. It is theirs now.

    • @danthemansmail
      @danthemansmail 28 днів тому +13

      What do you do when all the banks and credit unions are doing it? It's just a matter of time.

    • @pcs2511
      @pcs2511 28 днів тому

      ​@@danthemansmailhid it as they did in the pass.

  • @MDFGamingVideo
    @MDFGamingVideo 28 днів тому +230

    It's MY money. I can use it for whatever legal purpose that I want.

    • @GimpGladly
      @GimpGladly 25 днів тому +12

      You dobt need the word "legal" in that statement.

    • @maltonboy1640
      @maltonboy1640 22 дні тому +11

      Actually once you deposit, it's the banks money! They only have to give it to you in good faith. Not all banks store your money, but use it for other purposes in exchange for a small interest compensation. They sell you the idea that your savings are yours but that not true.

    • @1donniekak
      @1donniekak 21 день тому +8

      There are no illegal uses of money.

    • @andrewli1519
      @andrewli1519 16 днів тому +3

      What is to prevent the banks from using ur money to commit illegal acts (if they do commit them)

    • @auggiedoggiesmommy1734
      @auggiedoggiesmommy1734 13 днів тому

      @@maltonboy1640exactly. If you have more than what’s insured by FDIC, you only get the up to amount covered

  • @ad-drumcovers99
    @ad-drumcovers99 26 днів тому +169

    Neil Armstrong 1st man on moon
    Carla Patterson 1st woman to read the terms & conditions 🏆

    • @timmywitty1432
      @timmywitty1432 25 днів тому +9

      No one has ever been to the m o o n!

    • @ad-drumcovers99
      @ad-drumcovers99 25 днів тому +3

      @@timmywitty1432 🤣…well, yes there’s that awkward little fact…but good comparison though 😈

    • @Bambisgf77
      @Bambisgf77 24 дні тому +1

      Yall are joking right? 😮

    • @ad-drumcovers99
      @ad-drumcovers99 24 дні тому

      @@Bambisgf77 sure 😉

    • @oeb3847
      @oeb3847 23 дні тому +2

      @@timmywitty1432 It does seem odd that with no problems we went to the moon in 1969, but with ALL our new technology, we can't make it there in 2024.

  • @sinkinpat
    @sinkinpat 29 днів тому +1486

    Imagine, not being able to use your money on a constitutional right.

    • @SgtJoeSmith
      @SgtJoeSmith 29 днів тому +1

      or to pay taxes. i mean ponzi scheme.

    • @betsyj59
      @betsyj59 29 днів тому +164

      Once the banking system does away with physical currency and goes over to CBDC, how and when you spend your money will be monitored and controlled in whatever ways the central bank (Fed) decides. This will be true in all countries and the ultimate goal is a global central bank digital currency.

    • @SgtJoeSmith
      @SgtJoeSmith 29 днів тому +28

      @@sinkinpat or to pay taxes

    • @brentfarvors192
      @brentfarvors192 29 днів тому +29

      Well, that all depends on you, and me!!! Taking back the means of curremcy is always simply a gold/silver coin away...

    • @nonyadamnbusiness9887
      @nonyadamnbusiness9887 29 днів тому

      @@betsyj59 I don't believe it will ever happen. The government has too many uses for cash.

  • @OneSon744
    @OneSon744 29 днів тому +1233

    I will close my ICCU account my $ my choice !!! Who do people think they are???!

    • @betsyj59
      @betsyj59 29 днів тому

      This is the future of banking and not just in the US but globally. I'm a little surprised that a credit union jumped on the Agenda 30/Great Reset train, though.

    • @brentfarvors192
      @brentfarvors192 29 днів тому

      Hopefully bankrupt after this story ran...The writing is on the wall, folks! Banks consider your $, their $!!! Your parents, parents weren't wrong! The fraud comes/goes in cycles. Take a sizeable amount of $ out of your bank, and bury it somewhere safe...It's not "yours", until it's in your hands...

    • @rhammond2152
      @rhammond2152 29 днів тому +94

      i might ask at this point to ICCU....who recently moved into the board, and what's their past history?

    • @GreenBeret1903
      @GreenBeret1903 29 днів тому +26

      Hey now, don't speak bad about them, it's illegal

    • @SeptemberMeadows
      @SeptemberMeadows 29 днів тому

      I suspect that they are trying to make it so that they aren't held liable for helping to facilitate criminal activities. There are thousands of court cases you can easily search for showing how people sue companies and institutions who were not directly involved in a particular matter or incident just because a bad actor used their services. We live in a litigious society and everyone has to cover their butts with inch thick titanium, no matter how ridiculous it looks.

  • @user-po3ry3xh6y
    @user-po3ry3xh6y 29 днів тому +192

    No guns or ammo? This happened in Utah. Talk about ignoring your customers.

    • @amo0707-
      @amo0707- 26 днів тому +8

      I'm in Utah, which bank or credit union was it? Im definitely reading all our banking terms.

    • @tba113
      @tba113 26 днів тому +3

      By and large, yeah, though I understand SLC is pretty granola.

    • @mykeride
      @mykeride 24 дні тому +4

      @@amo0707- The OP is wrong. The "I" in ICCU is for Idaho, not Utah.

    • @m0L3ify
      @m0L3ify 22 дні тому

      Idaho

    • @americanadreaming
      @americanadreaming 18 днів тому

      Right! Next, they will say no magic underpants, ridiculous skygod cults, and more than one wife. Know the room, folks!

  • @user-oi4fg3os7t
    @user-oi4fg3os7t 29 днів тому +156

    That is not "confusion" on part of the customer. Businesses use 'Confusion" as a way of casting doubt on anyone who disagrees with them.

    • @campbellpaul
      @campbellpaul 26 днів тому +7

      It's called 'doublespeak,' and it's common among predatory businesses nowadays.

    • @northvanwan7428
      @northvanwan7428 6 днів тому

      same as some politicans.

  • @CJ3228
    @CJ3228 29 днів тому +786

    Get your money out.

    • @mrsentinel4911
      @mrsentinel4911 29 днів тому +9

      It's not money. It's phony paper fiat.

    • @user-pu6le9kk5v
      @user-pu6le9kk5v 29 днів тому +9

      It's just a matter of time before it's not your money any more. It's "Their" bank note. Maybe this will wake people up?

    • @brianm4178
      @brianm4178 28 днів тому +2

      ​@user-pu6le9kk5v they have been and folks tell them to go back to work, get a job or blah blah.... most places require a bank account for anything, especially a mortgage or an apartment, let alone paychecks. People on disabilit or social security aren't even allowed paper checks. Has to be direct deposit or they use your info to open an account in your name and load the funds on a card and send to your listed address.

    • @ArshAZ83
      @ArshAZ83 28 днів тому

      @@mrsentinel4911 beyond the scope.

    • @htos1av
      @htos1av 28 днів тому

      YESTERDAY!!!

  • @A_Retired_MSgt
    @A_Retired_MSgt 29 днів тому +295

    The phrase "standard industry usage" should scare the hell out of everybody, and people should be asking how those terms and conditions became "standard industry usage ".

    • @TheTibetyak
      @TheTibetyak 27 днів тому

      He who has the gold makes the rules. Yes, they have a political agenda as well. One of the 2A channels reported on this several months ago. Mastercard, VISA, AMEX I believe all have the verbiage in their Terms and Conditions. The government is using these big bank systems to track your purchases of guns, ammunition and firearm related materials. I don't know if it has been challenged in court yet.

    • @KralTube2
      @KralTube2 27 днів тому

      People are still deeply in denial about the "you will own nothing and be happy" 2030 plan. They're absolutely serious about it.

    • @mountainof7
      @mountainof7 27 днів тому +10

      Globalism

    • @refuztosay9454
      @refuztosay9454 27 днів тому

      Your Obama / Biden FDIC created this policy….

    • @lieselboschetti
      @lieselboschetti 26 днів тому +5

      I thought the exact same thing when I heard that phrasing... are other T&C at other companies along these same lines???? That's terrifying

  • @gingw7333
    @gingw7333 28 днів тому +165

    Read all terms for anything you agree to. I didn't once. It was a rental agreement at an apartment complex. We moved out because they were letting pest control in without notice or being accompanied by an employee. Nothing like waking up to a strange man standing over your bed. They sued us. Then we read the agreement. We fought it. The only ones of about 15 cases that day alone. Turns out, their lease was illegal 7 ways to Sunday. They hadn't had anyone fight before, so the judge had never read the lease. Once he did, he chewed their butts and dismissed all cases that day, telling them he'd do the same with every case until their lease was a legal one. We found out they lost a lot of cases until their legal team came up with a rental agreement the judge would accept.

    • @Cryptic0013
      @Cryptic0013 26 днів тому +17

      People really need to understand this. Terms of Use, NDAs, various conditions of employment. They're all frequently, flagrantly illegal. They're just presented with such confidence that nobody lawyers up and presses the issue.

    • @APackOfHungryGhosts
      @APackOfHungryGhosts 23 дні тому +3

      @@Cryptic0013 Most people aren't aware that NDA's become void if you witness something illegal. An NDA does not override law. They'll still threaten you that speaking out violates the NDA, which it does, but it doesn't matter, nothing will happen to you for violating it by reporting a crime.

    • @MattH-wg7ou
      @MattH-wg7ou 13 днів тому

      ​@@APackOfHungryGhosts well, maybe in some cases but certainly not with military NDAs, unfortunately.

  • @brainkill7034
    @brainkill7034 27 днів тому +65

    So glad she caught this, and even happier she was brave enough to share it. Thank you also for giving her a more prolific voice.

  • @SL-vs7fs
    @SL-vs7fs 29 днів тому +376

    Ms. Patterson, you are a hero. Please wear a cape.

    • @shelbynamels7948
      @shelbynamels7948 29 днів тому +2

      .... and your skivvies on the outside 🤣😆😘

    • @keithdaniels5918
      @keithdaniels5918 29 днів тому +5

      Edna says…..NO CAPES !!

    • @saythankyou111
      @saythankyou111 29 днів тому +2

      ….then get a crown 👑🇺🇸

    • @s.h.6858
      @s.h.6858 28 днів тому +3

      No, not a cape! Don't you know what capes do to heroes?

    • @scloftin8861
      @scloftin8861 28 днів тому +4

      In the voice of Edna Mode: No capes! They're dangerous. But yes, this woman is a hero!

  • @michaelwalker2492
    @michaelwalker2492 29 днів тому +671

    This is why we should never become a cashless society. Cash is king!

    • @dimitriberozny3729
      @dimitriberozny3729 29 днів тому

      This is the BEGINNING of GLOBAL HYBRID SOCIALISM which is cashless and a mix between communism and fascism!!!

    • @dannypowers4995
      @dannypowers4995 29 днів тому +19

      Exactly.

    • @raurmanproductions3438
      @raurmanproductions3438 29 днів тому +18

      Cash is only king if it's sound.

    • @patty4349
      @patty4349 29 днів тому +15

      I hate to break it to you, but there are businesses that are refusing to accept cash to decrease shrinkage and deter theft. This is where the "cashless" society will come from, not the banks.

    • @jdogswifty4372
      @jdogswifty4372 29 днів тому

      ​@patty4349 banks are pushing it too. Part of the fractional reserve banking means they only keep on hand balance of less than 1% of all total deposits in the bank. Don't believe me? Try to go into a bank and deposit $100,000 cash, they will close the bank down to handle a cash transaction that large not allowing the bank to operate until after that cash is picked up bcos they are afraid it will be stolen. Try to close an account of the same amount and most banks have a stipulation in their terms of service that you MUST give them notification at least 7 or more days in advance. I've had issues recently attempting to withdraw $8,000 in cash from my account that held in excess of that amount by thousands more, not even closing the account. Two times I was sent away with just a portion of the requested money and told to come back in a day or two for the remainder of my requested $8,000 cash withdraw.
      I will not transact with any business that refuses cash. They refuse my cash, I refuse them business. Even if I was to use a card for purchasing their products normally.
      Going cashless is solely a way for the govt to control where, when, on what, and how much you may spend what you've earned.

  • @calebwilliams7659
    @calebwilliams7659 28 днів тому +109

    I was going to be an ICCU member a few years back switching over from my Boeing CU account after moving out of WA state thinking that their close proximity would be better, but after I sat down with one of their reps to open an account and read their T&C's all I could think was, "why would anyone agree to this?!" I explained to her all the benefits I already had that I was expecting and that ICCU offered none of them (and their rules rules even stated some funds in my account would NEVER be accessible unless I closed the account because it was their "insurance against fraud" so in effect telling me I couldn't ever use my own money") I was so appalled I didn't even bother thanking her for her time. I just said, "not a chance" and walked out.

    • @RickJohnson
      @RickJohnson 28 днів тому +2

      The same $25 most CUs require you to keep in your savings account to keep your account open?

    • @calebwilliams7659
      @calebwilliams7659 28 днів тому +2

      @@RickJohnson yes, not required by BECU or any other CU I've ever heard of.

    • @brusselsprout5851
      @brusselsprout5851 9 днів тому +1

      I worked for Boeing Employees Credit Union during the 1990s. BECU is amazing and I always remind their employees when I speak to them. Leaving BECU for what appeared to be greener pastures was a mistake. It's my opinion the majority of their members have above average intelligence.

  • @brony_in_the_sticks
    @brony_in_the_sticks 25 днів тому +37

    How the hell is it even legal for them to force you not to pay, your court ordered payments.
    That be like it having a clause that said you couldn't use any of the money that is stored there to pay your IRS taxes.

  • @sibhuskyguy
    @sibhuskyguy 29 днів тому +891

    When the bank making money off your money restricts your use of your own money for legal items and services they're basically begging you to close your account and take your business elsewhere. It's YOUR money, not theirs... You have every right to spend your money how you want to as long as it's legal.

    • @dimitriberozny3729
      @dimitriberozny3729 29 днів тому +57

      Communism,that’s what this is!!!

    • @GreenBeret1903
      @GreenBeret1903 29 днів тому

      ​@dimitriberozny3729 it's ((them))

    • @sherylparsons2104
      @sherylparsons2104 29 днів тому +30

      Who determines what’s legal, or appropriate? I have a hard time believing they will follow the law if they are trying to restrict normal transactions.

    • @jimmythepirate494
      @jimmythepirate494 29 днів тому +29

      You have the right to spend your money as you please, whether illegally or not is irrelevant. The government was in control of currency until 1974 when they removed the gold standard. Who has the right to tell you how to use the unbacked wallpaper you earned as a government slave? This right here *DRIVES* unlawful use of funds, just as they intended.

    • @sibhuskyguy
      @sibhuskyguy 29 днів тому

      @@user-hu1um2xk5h the legal aspect is important because the business could be held liable for you breaking the law. right and wrong has not so much to do with that aspect of it... a business has every right to not allow illegal activities as it would affect their business. the chances of a credit union being able to propose and pass any sort of legislation are slim to none, so that isn't a factor. If someone wanted to buy illegal drugs or weapons, chances are they'd be taking cash out of the atm, not using their debit card... people selling illegal items generally don't want paper trails leading right to them.. the only person not thinking and going to conspiracy theories here is YOU. might want to try that thinking thing you so adamantly suggest...

  • @forkoffgoogle
    @forkoffgoogle 29 днів тому +310

    This should be illegal.

    • @cjmacq-vg8um
      @cjmacq-vg8um 29 днів тому +8

      simply reword the clause to say - "transactions can't be used for criminal or illegal activity." PROBLEM SOLVED! and then there's the problem - how do you ENFORCE such a clause?
      FACT - the small print, or "fine print" in contracts is invalid. its designed for people not to read and to hide potentially important aspects of the contract. FULL DISCLOSURE is what makes any contract valid. also, no one can change a contract WITHOUT THE CONSENT of all parties involved. corporations and the rich have been using contracts to scam people for 6000 years. 60% of the u. s. was stolen from the native americans using contracts. european colonization of the world succeded through contract scams.

    • @tomhenry897
      @tomhenry897 29 днів тому +18

      Encouraged by Democrats

    • @saythankyou111
      @saythankyou111 29 днів тому +2

      @@cjmacq-vg8umnot legal, by who’s definition…..🇺🇸

    • @Rhaspun
      @Rhaspun 29 днів тому +4

      And fire that person(s) who came up with these restrictions about what people can do with their money. As some people will say, "Then leave the CU". It is easily done as it isn't difficult to find a CU these days since they aren't as selective with who can sign up.

    • @cjmacq-vg8um
      @cjmacq-vg8um 29 днів тому +3

      @@saythankyou111 ... by the definition of THE LAW! THE MOST important aspect of contract law is that all parties act in "good faith." which simply means being HONEST. if any participant in any contract is lying or committing fraud the contract is invalid and unenforceable.

  • @ella2411m
    @ella2411m 27 днів тому +24

    I don’t think any financial institution should tell their customers how to spend their money. I’m glad I came across this video. Note to self - never open an account with ICCU!

  • @johnevans1969
    @johnevans1969 29 днів тому +40

    I will spend my money on whatever the hell I want to. Banks can piss off.

    • @AmyC37217
      @AmyC37217 25 днів тому

      `
      Except Credit Unions are not Banks. That's another problem - General Population doesn't know the difference between a Bank and a Credit Union.

    • @2stoves1
      @2stoves1 25 днів тому +1

      A lot of people freaking out about this because they can't think in nuanced terms, or can't even think and can only react.
      The credit union doesn't seem to be telling people how they can and can't "spend their money". They're saying how you can and can't "use their electronic payment system". There is a difference.
      Those clauses are meant to shield the credit union from liability if their electronic payment system is used in a crime. They don't want to be an accomplice, so they throw in this stuff to limit liability.
      Nothing says you couldn't still withdraw cash and buy what you want, or use your credit card, etc, looked like just not their electronic payment system. But idk.

    • @abijahdixon2771
      @abijahdixon2771 24 дні тому

      I'd be freaked out, I can only pay rent by check or money order, which is paid with my card, and I'm on a low income, fixed budget, so if I use a large amount of money, it takes a few days to to through, unlike small payments that zip right through. ​@2stoves1

    • @Honeybee-ym5vi
      @Honeybee-ym5vi 21 день тому

      @@2stoves1 You're right. "ebranch" refers to a "personal computer remote access." I.e., your personal computer at home or on your phone. I think they're not only looking to avoid implication in criminal activities but also liability from fraud the customer might encounter. You have to understand the language when reading a contract--as you do.

    • @northvanwan7428
      @northvanwan7428 6 днів тому

      @@2stoves1 udk ? so the nuanced terms are beyond you too.

  • @chanelle5889
    @chanelle5889 29 днів тому +612

    I don't even understand the logic behind not allowing someone to use their money for court-ordered payments.

    • @user-nq8vm2iv9v
      @user-nq8vm2iv9v 29 днів тому +3

      if you skip town the credit card company is responsible.

    • @PNWJEEPER01
      @PNWJEEPER01 29 днів тому

      @@user-nq8vm2iv9vit’s not a credit card company; it’s a credit union. Same thing as a bank in theory and array of services, but they’re usually collectively owned by the members who hold accounts there and have different (usually less expensive and higher yielding) fee and interest structures.

    • @msmoe8687
      @msmoe8687 29 днів тому

      ​@@user-nq8vm2iv9vmoney in an account is not a credit card.

    • @OhArchie
      @OhArchie 29 днів тому

      @@user-nq8vm2iv9v What credit card company?

    • @susandean5622
      @susandean5622 29 днів тому +100

      Credit cards have nothing to do with it.

  • @ace25805
    @ace25805 29 днів тому +472

    controlled substances = the potentially life saving prescription your licensed doctor prescribed. Unbelievable.

    • @jljl24
      @jljl24 29 днів тому +28

      Exactly what I was thinking

    • @Riverrockphotos
      @Riverrockphotos 29 днів тому

      Yup crazy right. Its not just pain pills that are controled. I take Lyrica and its controlled.

    • @teh-maxh
      @teh-maxh 29 днів тому +37

      Especially since they already said you can't buy illegal drugs, so the only thing "controlled substances" could be are the ones that *are* legal for you.

    • @antilogism
      @antilogism 29 днів тому +8

      @@teh-maxh Like beer!

    • @amiedavis5257
      @amiedavis5257 28 днів тому +12

      @@antilogism No stupid...like pain medication or medication for seizures (these are just small examples)...anything that is "controlled" and you have to have a DEA number for in order to prescribe. Have you just discovered you have opposable thumbs?

  • @staceycarroll7973
    @staceycarroll7973 29 днів тому +20

    LOL "People were confused". No, I don't think so. That's pretty straightforward wording. You can't use your money to exercise your 2A rights, nor obey any court-ordered payments. Oh, and don't even THINK about buying a large item with a cashier's check..... I'd be suddenly looking for a new bank too.

    • @northvanwan7428
      @northvanwan7428 6 днів тому

      yes its straightforward wording, but you still missed the point. The condition was you cant use their E Transfer system for the reasons stated. You could still withdraw cash or use debit etc.

  • @A_Legal_Immigrant_1776
    @A_Legal_Immigrant_1776 26 днів тому +30

    shall NOT be infringed

  • @onemanwanders
    @onemanwanders 29 днів тому +472

    Let the credit union go broke

    • @briansomething5987
      @briansomething5987 29 днів тому +2

      What a great idea! Any idea who owns the credit union, and thus would be hurt by that?

    • @lowermichigan4437
      @lowermichigan4437 29 днів тому +3

      In Idaho they might

    • @ArshAZ83
      @ArshAZ83 28 днів тому

      @@briansomething5987 The credit union isn't owned by the depositers you dingbat. You don't own a stake simply by putting your money into the credit union and if they are going to behave in this manner, restricting purchases on firearms, ammunitions and 'hateful materials' they shouldn't be in business and they made it clear if you want to purchase these things go somewhere else. So people will, gfy.

    • @Milkmans_Son
      @Milkmans_Son 27 днів тому +1

      So unlike you Idaho folks to jump on the cancel culture train...

    • @ld2048
      @ld2048 25 днів тому

      ​@Milkmans_Son it's not cancel culture, it's shutting down businesses with illegal practices buried in 900 pages of legal speak, it's shutting down an organization that wants to restrict what you can do with YOUR MONEY. It's doing what's right

  • @billsmith5166
    @billsmith5166 29 днів тому +263

    Insane! They don't want people to pay their child support??

    • @juelzd7172
      @juelzd7172 29 днів тому +5

      I heard that to. But it said “court ordered”. So I would assume if its court ordered you can’t. But if it’s NOT court ordered. You should still be able to.

    • @AKJames762
      @AKJames762 29 днів тому +42

      ​@juelzd7172 when are child support payments not court ordered? Child support is something the mother has to file for to get money from a deadbeat dad IIRC
      Edit: or a man filing to get money from a deadbeat mom

    • @juelzd7172
      @juelzd7172 29 днів тому +9

      @@AKJames762 not always court ordered. Some parents are able to coparent and make financial agreements for the kids without the courts. Very rare tho lol

    • @brkbtjunkie
      @brkbtjunkie 29 днів тому +19

      @@juelzd7172then it’s not the historic definition of child support.

    • @Riverrockphotos
      @Riverrockphotos 29 днів тому +8

      Or the IRS.

  • @KebbieW
    @KebbieW 26 днів тому +13

    THANK YOU, CARLA! Your decision to thoroughly read the User Agreement and take action to address the "sketchy" verbiage. I admire your courage and your amazing leadership. I did agree to those terms without reading thinking, "any other bank, I would probably read, but I trust Idaho Central Credi Union." I'm very disappointed I them and their lack of integrity and ethics. Many thanks to you for stepping up!!!

  • @bigp8868
    @bigp8868 27 днів тому +9

    It won’t be long before they will implement a list of approved purchases. Violations will allow them to seize your money.

  • @VegasGuy1975
    @VegasGuy1975 29 днів тому +341

    Can’t use my money to buy things that I’m legal to buy? Nope - I’ll use my money how I see fit.

    • @springerworks002
      @springerworks002 28 днів тому +6

      Should be able to use your money for illegal stuff too.

    • @rickysampson8759
      @rickysampson8759 28 днів тому

      Californians moving to Idaho with Biden policies

  • @msmoe8687
    @msmoe8687 29 днів тому +259

    Standard industry overreach.

    • @tsriftsal2069
      @tsriftsal2069 29 днів тому +1

      Standard overreaction commentary. None has gone and verified what they are saying.

    • @MyerShift7
      @MyerShift7 29 днів тому +5

      ​@@tsriftsal2069go get in your box car

    • @cheddar2648
      @cheddar2648 26 днів тому +4

      At least they did us the favor of disclosing that this problem is much larger than we initially suspected.

  • @Missunderstood103
    @Missunderstood103 28 днів тому +11

    Bless this woman. People need to leave ICCU.

  • @digiscrappin
    @digiscrappin 25 днів тому +9

    I closed my accounts years ago at ICCU when they treated me like a child. Most credit unions offer small loans for short term overdrafts. Their policy instead was to charge me a fee if my account dropped below $5. When I asked why they don’t offer to pull the funds from my savings or offer an overdraft loan, they said they expect their members to manage their money better. Thus the fee to teach me a lesson. No thanks. I manage my money by eliminating unnecessary fees. 😊

  • @KRich408
    @KRich408 29 днів тому +227

    The Bank got scared when the news got ahold of this! They knew customers would take their money somewhere else and leave them in a bad situation. We the people still have the power we just need to want to stand up for ourselves.

    • @christopherkidwell9817
      @christopherkidwell9817 29 днів тому +44

      Some of those 'updated' terms still sound egregious to me. If I was the state Attorney General, I would be opening investigations into this nonsense.

    • @Rhaspun
      @Rhaspun 29 днів тому +8

      When a lot of people start taking out their cash it can quickly cripple a bank. Think back a few months ago with those couple of banks that was making news. People starting taking their money out. A couple of bigger banks came in and bought them so they're doing okay now. The same thing can easily happen to this CU if a lot people started closing their accounts. It can easily happen since people can easily communicate with each other through social media.

    • @mistiinseattle
      @mistiinseattle 29 днів тому +6

      Yes but the updated terms are not much better

    • @seemorenite
      @seemorenite 28 днів тому +2

      It too late this is how they feel

  • @patdough7515
    @patdough7515 29 днів тому +370

    Wow … I would NOT use ICCU for my banking. My money $$$$$ and I’ll spend it how I want … just the fact that I couldn’t spend money on ammunition or firearms (I’m a hunter) I’d tell ICCU to go pound sand 🤮🤬🤮🤬🤮

    • @Marynicole830
      @Marynicole830 29 днів тому +14

      I’m far more worried and confused about not laying court ordered payments, child support or taxes owed from the balance. The firearms thing is dumb but this is super concerning.

    • @UrsulaPowers
      @UrsulaPowers 29 днів тому +9

      @@Marynicole830It was not the payments but FINES related to payments. Still very intrusive.

    • @MamaMOB
      @MamaMOB 28 днів тому

      Then you should apply that to literally every financial institution under the Sun. Because they're just using the laws it's written. When you deposit your money in a bank that money becomes the banks it's no longer yours. They can deny giving it to you for whatever reason they like.

    • @gaylenewood7707
      @gaylenewood7707 28 днів тому

      Just think that bank will tell you couldn't use your money to buy birth control like rubbers and what not which means they'll be in your bedroom life next.

    • @RickJohnson
      @RickJohnson 28 днів тому +2

      Do you normally log into an app like Venmo, CashApp, or ICCU's app to send payment to the retailer selling guns and ammo, or do you swipe a credit card? Only the former is restricted.

  • @hellabiz4289
    @hellabiz4289 28 днів тому +21

    Even more puzzling: From ICCU statement on the matter, "On June 26, we updated our eBranch agreement to include STANDARD INDUSTRY VERBIAGE regarding certain transactions." If it's now "standard industry verbiage," it has infected more than just ICCU. And if it's in the Credit Union fine print, it's for sure either already in banking language, or soon will be. What fresh new hell is this?

    • @RickJohnson
      @RickJohnson 28 днів тому +4

      When's the last time you paid your friend who's not an FFL for that extra gun using Venmo? Or your ex with Zelle? That's the scope of the restriction - an online electronic payment service attached to the bank.

    • @tibbified
      @tibbified 27 днів тому

      OMG. They can't stop you from writing a check or paying cash. It would just be related to certain electronic payments. All you credit unions or banks will have something similar. Better pull your money from them all!

    • @hellabiz4289
      @hellabiz4289 27 днів тому

      @@tibbified Write back in a couple of years, maybe less ... let me know how this works out for you. Meanwhile, have a great day!

    • @neddannenberg100
      @neddannenberg100 27 днів тому +3

      Yeah the fine print says the rules are for the “ebranch” feature which appears to be their ACH offering. Reporter could have pointed it out… these are not restrictions on debit cards, checks, cash, etc. But the credit union didn’t do themselves any favors with the evasive statement. Just say these restrictions are standard for direct bank transfers and we invite our customers to use their debit card, etc.

    • @RickJohnson
      @RickJohnson 27 днів тому +1

      @@neddannenberg100 it's not even all ACH transactions - just a bill-pay or customer-initiated ACH via their eBranch software for person-to-person transactions.

  • @neomonk5668
    @neomonk5668 28 днів тому +6

    Bless her for reading the terms and thank the station for bringing this to light.

    • @RickJohnson
      @RickJohnson 28 днів тому

      There's a big difference between reading and understanding. She failed to understand what eBranch really is. It's an online banking service that includes electronic transfers and bill payment. Think Venmo, Cash App, Zelle, etc.

  • @lauriivey7801
    @lauriivey7801 29 днів тому +236

    Pardon?? It's my damned money, I'll use it how I please!!

    • @FosterTravis1071
      @FosterTravis1071 29 днів тому +11

      Not once you have the digital dollar.

    • @NotTheRealRustyShackleford
      @NotTheRealRustyShackleford 29 днів тому +4

      ​@@FosterTravis1071 Can't digitize gold and silver...

    • @yerbudspud
      @yerbudspud 29 днів тому +4

      ​@@FosterTravis1071 If it's in a bank it's already digital.

    • @MamaMOB
      @MamaMOB 28 днів тому

      Except that it's not once you've deposited it in the bank. When you give your money to the bank you give your money to the bank it is now their money. People really need to learn this.

    • @ArshAZ83
      @ArshAZ83 28 днів тому

      @@NotTheRealRustyShackleford yea but unfortunately it's not standardised as fluctuates daily making it really hard to use to make daily purchases. When gold was used as coinage the price was quite stable as it was what currency's value was based upon. You simply can't reapply that any more. I wouldn't accept payment in gold or silver for every day items, for one the price of the everyday item is largely fixed, but the gold and silver could lose 10% of its value in a day and I'd lose money or it'd gain 10% and you'd lose money. This is why dealers always charge spot based on market adjustments.

  • @randoir1863
    @randoir1863 29 днів тому +67

    What the F*CK is wrong with businesses these days? Who the hell do they think they are telling me what I can and can't spend my hard earned money on ? Agree or leave ? DONE I'M OUTTA HERE !!!!!

    • @htos1av
      @htos1av 27 днів тому +6

      Us legislators "sold" everything "overseas", NOW, the owners want their stufff...(i.e. you-look up "blackrock")

    • @blschafer4310
      @blschafer4310 26 днів тому +1

      If you think THIS is bad, just wait until money is all digital.

    • @humbughumbughumbug
      @humbughumbughumbug 26 днів тому +1

      It's called, "ESG scores"

  • @katherinemcintosh7247
    @katherinemcintosh7247 25 днів тому +5

    I don’t understand how anyone, as claimed by the CU, could be “confused” by a sentence which includes saying one cannot use their money to pay child support…unless that confusion lies with the question, “why the hell not?!?”
    Is this credit union against people paying court ordered child support? Or…what?
    I am confused by that (and most of the restrictions listed) simply because it makes absolutely no sense.

  • @MW-hm9ub
    @MW-hm9ub 26 днів тому +5

    The only way to fight this is to yank all your money out.

  • @TwilightMysts
    @TwilightMysts 29 днів тому +139

    If this became widely known, this bank would probably go out of business. Idaho is not a good state to say "you can't buy guns or ammo" in...

    • @wildbill23c
      @wildbill23c 28 днів тому +7

      A few credit card companies have already done this, so its not surprising a bank is trying it too...and others will follow suit because consumers have no choice but to bank with a bank or credit union due to so many companies no longer being local to pay your bills in person with cash or a check...many places have no clue what a check even is anymore let alone what to do with them LOL....they don't even like cash it seems.

    • @txquartz
      @txquartz 28 днів тому +8

      I've worked in banking and most have similar restrictions. What they are failing to tell you is that eBranch is their non-Zelle money transfer system, not check or debit purchases. The fact it is direct transfers exposes the bank to money laundering issues if they are allowed since all other payment methods have legal risk on the reciever's side. So, for example, if you pay a drug dealer with a check, it's their bank who gets in trouble because the money was dirty. If you send the transfer, it becomes your bank's trouble.

    • @user-jb4xv4im9o
      @user-jb4xv4im9o 27 днів тому +2

      ​@@txquartz
      Yes, it's all about them covering their *** in every way possible in order to keep them from being held responsible in any way.
      This way if we use it for these things and there is a problem then they can blame us.

    • @redneckhippiefreak
      @redneckhippiefreak 27 днів тому

      @@wildbill23c The irony is. My card company disputed an ammo purchase after the sale was completed. . I only make in person purchases but they expected to decline the purchase when tagged on line through a data base. My ammo dealer is set up as a pawn shop. "Sporting goods" is the heading. The Card co. noticed 5x5.56 pellets on the monthly audit..thats when they refused to pay the ammo dealer and demanded that I settle the account. The thing they were ignorant of, My account was settled the day I made the purchase so my money was in their bank waiting......They had a conniption fit of phone calls and emails. . It looked like they owed me the money if they refused to pay him and it looked like they were trying to take money from a legit business if they didn't pay him. I called the BBB just to stir the pot. It must have worked. .. He contested their non payment & got his money and I was somehow reimbursed for a purchase they said I never made.... I ended up getting $1200 worth of ammo for free and the next bill cycle showed I had a $2400 available Credit on my "Credit card" that only has a $1500 limit.. XP Those idiots actually sent me a certified check for the $1200 purchase to "settle the account" . I now have a $1500 credit limit again and ammo due to their ineptitude.. That was nearly 2 years ago...XP

    • @The1withlogic
      @The1withlogic 27 днів тому +6

      This is just bad journalism. It does not prohibit buying any of these things with your money, it prohibits the use of Zelle to pay for these things. You can use your debit card, cash or credit card, just not Zelle. Every bank has this policy.

  • @jim9337
    @jim9337 29 днів тому +143

    Any luck the good folks in Idaho will put that credit union out of business.

    • @b_uppy
      @b_uppy 29 днів тому +11

      YES

    • @cgschow1971
      @cgschow1971 29 днів тому +1

      Don't be so sure. 99.9% of customers will be unaffected by this.

    • @b_uppy
      @b_uppy 29 днів тому

      @@cgschow1971
      If they hear the report, and know the repercussions, they will. And btw a small percent deeply affects profit in smaller companies.

    • @b_uppy
      @b_uppy 29 днів тому +10

      @@cgschow1971
      Idaho people do purchase ammo, people do pay penalties for late child support payments (they often do if the state has support enforcement, and are slow to process paperwork), and will likely be kicked out, etc and there'll be even more ruckus. This affects a larger segment of the population than is convenient for the credit union. DEI and woke ideology policies are goingto be more expensive than 5ne bank cares to admit. DEI is another way to say DiE in the business world. Even the hosts acknowledged it...

    • @b_uppy
      @b_uppy 29 днів тому +2

      @@cgschow1971
      Even the hosts disagree.

  • @brianm4178
    @brianm4178 28 днів тому +33

    That part about the guns.. thats called infringement of the 2A constitutional right.

    • @brianm4178
      @brianm4178 26 днів тому

      @campbellpaul they are skipping government laws that infringed on their rights, so they ignored unlawful orders. They are fine... it's those who passed the laws that infringed on the rights of the people that need to be focused on. We dont get mad at the folks from the Boston tea party throwing the spice and crates in protest, we won't get mad about buying pieces of a tool, to assemble later bevause uncle Sam overstepped his bounds. Not all heroes wear capes, you know? 🤣

    • @suzannen.6403
      @suzannen.6403 26 днів тому

      OMFG you gun nuts are outta control... lmfao!!!!!

    • @brianm4178
      @brianm4178 26 днів тому

      @suzannen.6403 oh yeah it's us. Right... not the domestic terrorists trying to dissolve the constitution because "feelimgs" 🤣🤣🤣

    • @krabysniper
      @krabysniper 26 днів тому

      ​@@campbellpaul spew some more lies lefty 🤡.
      You CAN NOT PURCHASE FULL AUTO weapons in England. Unbelievable the 💩 you lefty 🤡s come up with.

    • @brony_in_the_sticks
      @brony_in_the_sticks 25 днів тому +1

      This is not true, much like the first amendment doesn't apply to Twitter, the second amendment doesn't apply to companies either.
      Those amendments only apply to what the government is allowed to impose.
      There's nothing in the Constitution that says that the people who give you the money aren't allowed to say that you're not allowed to use it for certain things, or they'll fire you if you do because they don't want to associate with people who do that.
      The same thing goes with banks, if it's a company it's allowed to deplatform certain things.
      That doesn't mean it should be allowed to do that but that's how things are set up

  • @rexmundi8154
    @rexmundi8154 28 днів тому +5

    You can load documents like this to an AI like Claude (my favorite) or Chat GPT and ask them to summarize them and point out any unusual terms or conditions. It works great

  • @pntaknta
    @pntaknta 29 днів тому +78

    I just checked the prohibited payment section of the credit union I bank with. It reads the same way with the exception of child support sort of issues. I will be contacting them on this issue today. Clearly it is true that we do not own our money. Thankyou very much for the heads up.

    • @RickJohnson
      @RickJohnson 28 днів тому +4

      Is it blanket, or just using their online bill-pay? Mine has similar "don't use us for illegal stuff" clauses, but only to limit their liability in the chain of the transaction.

  • @stevejones9062
    @stevejones9062 29 днів тому +95

    Agreement attempts to take away your legal right to use your own money as you see fit, they are not legally responsible for your actions.

    • @brentfarvors192
      @brentfarvors192 29 днів тому +8

      Anyone watching this with an acct there, knows what to do!!! %100 GUARANTEE they will change their terms when the $ starts moving out!!!

  • @jamesalderman5387
    @jamesalderman5387 26 днів тому +3

    Not allowing customers to pay their taxes is the quickest way to get your financial institution. shut down.

  • @darrylhowe1465
    @darrylhowe1465 26 днів тому +2

    When your bank starts telling you how you CAN or CAN'T spend your money, it is time to take YOUR money out of that bank.

  • @patty109109
    @patty109109 29 днів тому +71

    It doesn’t sound to me like the updated verbiage caused any confusion. It says very plainly in the text that you can’t use it for firearms what is confusing? The bank is using confusion as an excuse. I don’t think this woman sounds confused at all.

  • @DellikkilleD
    @DellikkilleD 26 днів тому +3

    just remember, an illegal contract is unenforceable.

  • @CivilCitizen
    @CivilCitizen 25 днів тому +3

    They need to take the ‘Idaho’ out of ICCU. Central Credit Union is more appropriate.

  • @richardf6932
    @richardf6932 29 днів тому +90

    If enough customers pull their money out, it will send a message to the executives. They need the deposits in order to meet reserves for all the outstanding loans. If there is a bank run, it will be the next Silicon Valley Bank..... You don't want to wait for FDIC to give you your money....

    • @SB-rn4fy
      @SB-rn4fy 28 днів тому +8

      NCUA not FDIC

  • @SL-vs7fs
    @SL-vs7fs 29 днів тому +59

    It’s very simple, folks! Nobody at the bank read the agreement either. 😂😂😂

  • @MileyonDisney
    @MileyonDisney 28 днів тому +3

    Apparently, Hunter came up with the ‘unicorn’ analogy, and dude tried to steal it. She wasn’t having any of that.

  • @Bambisgf77
    @Bambisgf77 24 дні тому +2

    Thank you ma’am! Imagine a bank telling you how to spend your OWN MONEY!! I am so impressed with this lady! Backing up her words with actual action! Brava!

  • @christophergarcia2055
    @christophergarcia2055 29 днів тому +113

    I think we need some legislation on this. No willing transaction should be prevented.

    • @stvargas69
      @stvargas69 29 днів тому +17

      Last time the govt made laws about money we got the Fed

    • @patty109109
      @patty109109 29 днів тому +4

      @@stvargas69 the government has made many laws about money. Many of them are very good.

    • @selanryn5849
      @selanryn5849 29 днів тому +4

      @@stvargas69No, that was the FIRST time.

    • @tomhenry897
      @tomhenry897 29 днів тому +3

      Democrats support this

    • @tomhenry897
      @tomhenry897 29 днів тому

      Which ones

  • @JCC.M.
    @JCC.M. 29 днів тому +45

    The reply from ICCU really didn't clarify anything. Are they saying that the current terms and conditions with the illegal Section 13, is still in effect? Illegal in the fact that they are saying that I, as an American, cannot utilize my 2nd Amendment rights, nor can I follow a court's order(s) in paying for alimony or child support. If this is 'Standard Industry Verbiage, then there is something wrong with the industry!

    • @antilogism
      @antilogism 29 днів тому +4

      Or pay taxes, buy prescription drugs, cigs or beer---surprised gambling isn't banned too.

    • @shaunbroyhill
      @shaunbroyhill 28 днів тому +8

      Nope, it doesn't say that at all. The TV station is so misquoting what it says, as it keeps saying "Account" instead of "eBranch". eBranch is a service of the account. You can use your ICCU debit card to buy a firearm, pay child support, or pay alimony. You can use a check on their account to buy a firearm, pay child support, or pay alimony. If any of those services use online payment processing, they can initiate a purchase off your ICCU account for any of these things.
      What the bank is saying is that you cannot use eBranch to initiate a payment directly from the bank using the eBranch payment system to transfer money to do any of these things, similar to if you were to log into paypal to initiate a transfer to a vendor for any of these things. This is their online version of "Bill Pay" that is initiated on the banks end, not the vendors.

    • @Milkmans_Son
      @Milkmans_Son 27 днів тому

      @@shaunbroyhill also, something that always seems to get lost in the outrage mix is the fact that customers actually can use eBranch for literally anything they want. Unless the payment is being sent to "Online Hit Man Services" or some such, it will likely to through. There might be consequences after the fact, but that's always true.

    • @cheddar2648
      @cheddar2648 26 днів тому +2

      Credit Unions have elections for leadership. Get organized, get elected, and vote the filth out of there.

  • @alexmacdonald258
    @alexmacdonald258 25 днів тому +4

    sounds like somebody let in a few too many californians to the area.

  • @ProtoMario
    @ProtoMario 28 днів тому +1

    I read them fully, once read them live on stream lol.

  • @jonflanagin6682
    @jonflanagin6682 29 днів тому +49

    If you can't pay the IRS , how about getting your tax returns deposited.

  • @johnodo764
    @johnodo764 29 днів тому +17

    That is why we must never give up our cash.

  • @thefourhorsemen91
    @thefourhorsemen91 25 днів тому +2

    Keep taking money out of the credit union. Make them go under. Screw this bank.

  • @grindychum
    @grindychum 26 днів тому +2

    Screw that bank, pull your money out. There are banks EVERY where. That bank is privileged that you allow them to borrow your money for a penny on the dollar. The audacity of them to think they can dictate what you spend your money on.

  • @dustinbragg1921
    @dustinbragg1921 29 днів тому +24

    The _only_ reason I can think of for why the ToS would prohibit using the electronic banking service for paying official orders is if those orders had specific legal requirements for how they had to be paid that the service does not meet. Otherwise I'm sure the corporate lawyers from the bank would have a blast explaining to a judge why they keep blocking the child support payments he ordered.

  • @theclamhammer4447
    @theclamhammer4447 29 днів тому +31

    Credit card companies(and processors) have been doing this for years. They’ve outright made blacklists and refused to work with 2A companies. You might’ve heard where shipping companies signed on to refuse delivery services of these same companies. Fortunately it appeared to be a social posturing bluff.

  • @modolief
    @modolief 27 днів тому

    KTVP thanks for reporting this.

  • @icestationzebraassociates2460
    @icestationzebraassociates2460 25 днів тому +2

    I'm sorry your honor - I can't pay my child support. My credit union says no.

    • @xxxsandman
      @xxxsandman 25 днів тому

      which is not a good thing at all.

  • @wcsoblake85
    @wcsoblake85 29 днів тому +48

    The money in that bank is your money so how can they tell you what you can spend your money on?!?!

    • @user-lh5re8jh7u
      @user-lh5re8jh7u 29 днів тому +3

      Unfortunately, bank deposits are unsecured loans to the bank.

    • @marilynd3996
      @marilynd3996 29 днів тому +2

      Once you deposit money in the bank you become a creditor to the bank. Good luck getting your money out during a bail-in and your claim is way down the line to more senior creditors.

    • @wildbill23c
      @wildbill23c 28 днів тому +1

      Tell your bank that and let us know how that works out for you....they don't care, once they have your money, they couldn't care less about what you want to buy, as long as it fits their scheming minds.

    • @ArshAZ83
      @ArshAZ83 28 днів тому

      @@user-lh5re8jh7u yea that is where the government has a legitimate duty to make sure these fuckers aren't doing whatever they want, unfortunately our government is more out of control than these banks. All the scumbags of society are trying to push their luck with the producers and contributers in society. It will run out eventually.

  • @wm3138
    @wm3138 29 днів тому +44

    Since when can a bank or credit union tell you how you can spend your own money???

    • @christopherkidwell9817
      @christopherkidwell9817 29 днів тому

      They can't. Many of these 'terms and conditions' are already illegal by state law if not federal law. They are pushing hoping to 'skware' people into not doing LEGAL transactions that BY THE LAW they cannot interfere in NOR drop people's accounts for.

    • @v3rlon
      @v3rlon 29 днів тому +4

      Since you clicked agree, apparently.

    • @garrettswoodworx1873
      @garrettswoodworx1873 29 днів тому +2

      When you agree to let them by agreeing to their terms and conditions.

    • @wildbill23c
      @wildbill23c 28 днів тому +2

      As soon as you open an account and put money in it, they can do as they please.

    • @Milkmans_Son
      @Milkmans_Son 27 днів тому

      It's not about how you spend your MONEY, it's about how you use EBRANCH. Do you need help understanding the difference?

  • @wdtaut5650
    @wdtaut5650 28 днів тому +1

    3:58 I tried that. No one there could explain what the lawyer words meant. After over 30 years there, I went some where else.

  • @jameslarsen1728
    @jameslarsen1728 25 днів тому +1

    US Bank tried this with me. I'm no longer with them since they put that I couldn't use my money for a money order which at the time I had to pay rent through a money order as my apartment wouldn't accept any other payments (stupid scammers messing things up and thank God my apartment complex fixed it so we have other ways to pay). After that if it deals with money I'm reading the terms and conditions

  • @larryg.9187
    @larryg.9187 29 днів тому +48

    Wait a second... You can't use YOUR money to pay CHILD SUPPORT ??? ... HUH ??? ...

    • @johnwilliams7922
      @johnwilliams7922 29 днів тому +2

      Other person noted that it said couldn't use the ICCU ETF system for making those payments. Probably to keep itself from getting blamed for missed payments.

    • @wildbill23c
      @wildbill23c 28 днів тому +9

      I wanna hear what the courts have to say about that one when someone says they can't pay because their bank won't allow them to....

    • @boomergames8094
      @boomergames8094 27 днів тому +4

      @@johnwilliams7922 Disclaimers about timeliness would legally protect them. Its like if the Post Office said you can't use the post office to send tax returns, or child support or whatever because there is no guarantee of timely processing.

    • @johnwilliams7922
      @johnwilliams7922 27 днів тому +2

      @@boomergames8094 Probably. Always room for weaseling.

  • @fishgutz4272
    @fishgutz4272 29 днів тому +60

    How can any bank ban a customer from the use of their own funds for any lawful purpose?

    • @christopherkidwell9817
      @christopherkidwell9817 29 днів тому +18

      They can't. If these 'TOS' were challenged in a court of law, the judges would laugh them out of the courts, saying "NOT ENFORCEABLE IN THE DAMNED SLIGHTEST!"

    • @RickJohnson
      @RickJohnson 28 днів тому

      They don't, but every bank has them - not just this one. What they're essentially doing is distancing themselves from the crime.

  • @marcberm
    @marcberm 28 днів тому +2

    There's nothing out of the ordinary here. The terms are for use of THE MOBILE APP, not usage of the account itself. There are laws governing what you can do with electronic money re: money laundering. There's nothing to prevent you from withdrawing cash at a branch and spending it however you like, or using a checking-linked debit card for any legal transactions where the card issuer (Visa, MasterCard, etc.) is accepted. People need to read the T's & C's, yes, but they also need to understand what the &^$% they're reading and what it applies to.

    • @hellabiz4289
      @hellabiz4289 27 днів тому

      Nothing preventing you from withdrawing cash except for caps on how much cash you may withdraw on any given day; a requirement to provide information as to WHY you are withdrawing cash (remember that $600 in/out reporting requirement, if you can even get it ... most banks/CUs have ). It's seems far easier for everyone to stick their noses in and track mobile payments than to ferret out someone squirreling away cash and using it. Seeing as how we're heading to mostly app-based financials, it is problematic.

  • @zmoore5555
    @zmoore5555 26 днів тому

    Thanks News 7 for putting this story out!!

  • @xphiles2345
    @xphiles2345 29 днів тому +81

    Bud Light this company

    • @rufusmacck3712
      @rufusmacck3712 28 днів тому +10

      And Target plus Tractor Supply.

    • @plantfeeder6677
      @plantfeeder6677 28 днів тому

      ​@@rufusmacck3712plus John Deer too

    • @Milkmans_Son
      @Milkmans_Son 27 днів тому

      You guys are getting really good at cancel culture. Keep it up!

    • @TheTibetyak
      @TheTibetyak 27 днів тому

      @xphiles2345 - Just don't be impulsive about it. Back to that part about standard usage of language. You can pull your money out of credit union A but the other banks and credit unions might very well already have the same stipulations.

    • @xphiles2345
      @xphiles2345 27 днів тому

      @@TheTibetyak yeah, i get it, you cant boycott everything.....i do my best though

  • @FigsForYou
    @FigsForYou 29 днів тому +31

    "Well sry babe, I'd like to pay my child support, but my bank won't let me (😜)."

    • @edwamser
      @edwamser 29 днів тому +5

      someone in marketing thought it would be a good idea to pick up the deadbeat spouse market... ;)

    • @wildbill23c
      @wildbill23c 28 днів тому +2

      I want to hear what the courts start saying when this starts happening, because we know damn well its gonna become an issue pretty soon. I mean I guess its a great excuse for those who have no intentions of ever paying their child support but those who are doing the right thing, great, let's just allow a bank to make it harder for them to do what they're supposed to be doing.

  • @PatrickKQ4HBD
    @PatrickKQ4HBD 27 днів тому

    Good journalism! 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼
    We should all get used to reading T&Cs, even those that change frequently, and fighting back at every opportunity. Stay free, my friends.

  • @_Safety_Third_
    @_Safety_Third_ 28 днів тому +1

    They said this is industry standard so I guess I'll be checking my account terms and conditions too!

  • @sherylparsons2104
    @sherylparsons2104 29 днів тому +27

    It might be a good idea for all of us to read our agreements with our own financial institutions.

    • @wildbill23c
      @wildbill23c 28 днів тому +1

      Probably don't want to, I bet most of them say similar things.

    • @BeyondPC
      @BeyondPC 27 днів тому

      Better yet re-read your DoI and Bill of Rights then ask yourself: do I consent to this kind of corporate governance? The answer should be No and the act should be closing all bank accounts in favor of cash.

  • @dianarockwell6256
    @dianarockwell6256 29 днів тому +77

    I just found out that in New Zealand you are required to tell your bank what you need the money for when you make a withdrawal. There’s a guy going around taking money out of his accounts and claiming it’s for all sorts of embarrassing/funny reasons. They haven’t said that they will deny you for taking the money out, just that they have to know why you’re taking the money out.

    • @theshadowoftruth7561
      @theshadowoftruth7561 29 днів тому

      Having to pay off his prostitute!

    • @visitingfromsantafe1329
      @visitingfromsantafe1329 29 днів тому +5

      I believe that may be true in u.s. for amount over 10,000.

    • @user-lh5re8jh7u
      @user-lh5re8jh7u 29 днів тому

      ​@@visitingfromsantafe1329 not yet

    • @ritadyer9295
      @ritadyer9295 29 днів тому +3

      They also ask where you got the money for deposit if it’s a lot of cash or even a check!

    • @wildbill23c
      @wildbill23c 28 днів тому +3

      I'm withdrawing my money because I can, its my money, simple as that.

  • @robz6306
    @robz6306 25 днів тому +1

    The revisions on the terms of use just mean the bank defines illicit. It is worse because it can be way more than the previous list.

  • @00leaveralone
    @00leaveralone 27 днів тому

    Thank you for real informative and useful NEWS KTVB.

  • @ramiroperez2461
    @ramiroperez2461 29 днів тому +60

    I don't even have an ICCU account and I'm closing it too 😅

    • @suzanneroberge494
      @suzanneroberge494 29 днів тому +4

      I think this is a great heads up for ALL of us, in Idaho & not.

    • @ramiroperez2461
      @ramiroperez2461 29 днів тому

      @@suzanneroberge494 yes it is 👌 the best way to not be without money is have money here and there and somewhere else,

    • @ramiroperez2461
      @ramiroperez2461 День тому

      @@suzanneroberge494 yes it is 👌 I live in Texas

  • @lawrencehalpin6611
    @lawrencehalpin6611 29 днів тому +16

    Thank you for airing this. I hope all the members of the credit union close their accounts. Make better choices and the world will get better.

    • @lawrencehalpin6611
      @lawrencehalpin6611 27 днів тому +2

      @@tibbified That is how they will control you. Tow the line or no money.

  • @Watching-the_world-burn
    @Watching-the_world-burn 24 дні тому +2

    Firearms are constitutionally protected and lawful to purchase.

  • @allenra530
    @allenra530 28 днів тому +2

    I have never been an ICU customer, but with all of their stupid regulations, I would never consider putting money in their institution. "Standard Industry Practices" are riddled with DEI and other "woke" ideas. Such garbage has no place in Idaho and ICU should either change their "Terms and Conditions" or be ready to lose a lot of members.

  • @Kahless_the_Unforgettable
    @Kahless_the_Unforgettable 29 днів тому +48

    An Idaho only company did something this stupid? I understand when a national bank does this, but in a state that is this pro-2A? They're almost literally asking to go out of business.

    • @ToddMagnussonWasHere
      @ToddMagnussonWasHere 29 днів тому

      That’s exactly what my first thought was, it was like that “Never go full retard” meme, 😂 especially knowing that a decent amount of 2A supporters have purposefully moved there. Must be a CU run by a SoCal type.

    • @parajerry
      @parajerry 29 днів тому

      Still managed by leftists, likely from or in California. Remember: A leftist cannot allow anyone else to live in a manner the leftist doesn't approve of. They will use anything at their disposal to enforce their agenda and will on you. NEVER give a leftist a position of authority in ANYTHING.

    • @wildbill23c
      @wildbill23c 28 днів тому +3

      ICCU hasn't been on my good list for a while in the first place, I guess they want to compete with top place for worst bank along side Wells Fargo.

    • @NGC-gu6dz
      @NGC-gu6dz 28 днів тому +7

      The managerial class isn't pro 2a.

    • @Kahless_the_Unforgettable
      @Kahless_the_Unforgettable 27 днів тому

      @@Milkmans_Son Are you an ICCU employee?
      Why do you think it matters that these terms were supposedly for "eBranch" services? How does that change any of our complaints? Why did you bring up the FDIC? Are you saying that ICCU is going to fail soon? Are you aware that the FDIC doesn't cover your entire deposit? It only covers up to 250,000 dollars.
      So, are you saying that anyone with more than 250,000 dollars in ICCU should immediately remove their money from the Union because you believe that ICCU is on the brink of imminent failure? There's literally no other reason to bring up FDIC. Especially since I didn't bring it up.
      Hey look! Idahoans do understand things. We aren't as stupid as ICCU thought we were.
      If this is your defense, you might want to rethink it. That's absolutely ridiculous. Bringing up a completely irrelevant fact, and then saying the bank is going to fail is not a good way to instill confidence.

  • @miranda457
    @miranda457 29 днів тому +46

    Thanks Patterson !

  • @terrimobley6067
    @terrimobley6067 27 днів тому +1

    Good for her. Raising awareness that banks are not neutral. Resist!

  • @CryptoMeme
    @CryptoMeme 28 днів тому +1

    That bank won’t be around in a few decades

  • @darthhodges
    @darthhodges 29 днів тому +36

    One person once set up a public wifi access point in a coffee shop where the terms and conditions included "surrendering your first born child to the owner of the access point". It wasn't hidden, he even made a header intended to get your attention if you even skimmed it. Not one person in the coffee shop mentioned it because, obviously, they didn't see it.

  • @rickchapman9232
    @rickchapman9232 29 днів тому +40

    Send the new version to the Federal Trade Commission and the F.D.I.C because it sounds like they are trying to make you commit contempt of court.

    • @wildbill23c
      @wildbill23c 28 днів тому

      They don't care, they'll get away with whatever they want because like politicians, doing things legally isn't in their understanding.

    • @Milkmans_Son
      @Milkmans_Son 27 днів тому

      Any fresh out of law school attorney can probably get you off a contempt charge that was filed for violating a bank's terms of service... since, it, ah, well, it makes no sense whatsoever.

    • @clockworkvanhellsing372
      @clockworkvanhellsing372 27 днів тому

      Ask the IRS if they are fine with banks preventing people from paying their taxes.

  • @bobboberson5755
    @bobboberson5755 28 днів тому

    Nice to see actual reporters reporting. I will start shopping for a replacement bank today.

    • @RickJohnson
      @RickJohnson 28 днів тому

      Except they're reporting inaccurately by conflating the term eBranch with the customer's entire account. They're not the same.

  • @Nickrioblanco1
    @Nickrioblanco1 27 днів тому +1

    This credit union seems to think the money you have in their institution belongs to them.

  • @richardf6932
    @richardf6932 29 днів тому +24

    My old job involved reading and understanding the End User Agreement for software, the ones that you either accept or reject when you use their software. If you think that is all there is, there is usually more where additional uses of their software is further defined by their attorneys. It is not available to you until you ask or violated their agreement.....

  • @russellh8702
    @russellh8702 29 днів тому +13

    Imagine telling someone how to spend their hard earned money.

  • @ronaldhudson169
    @ronaldhudson169 28 днів тому +1

    And if you have to carry all your cash around with you, or store it in your home, because all the credit unions and banks have similar policy - Well your cash is now subject to civil forfiture.

  • @Honeybee-ym5vi
    @Honeybee-ym5vi 21 день тому

    I'm another person who read the new terms levied when my smaller bank became absorbed by a much larger bank recently. I live in Nevada, and this has happened to me 4-5 times in a couple of decades. The trouble with opting out of one bank and looking for another (I don't know the situation in Idaho) is that ICCC is correct. This language is in nearly every set of terms from banks these days because they're under more central control. Whereas smaller, local banks and credit unions used to be bastions of more freedom and independence and have close customer relations, the banking system throughout America is tightening, and restrictions like these are included (like not purchasing a gun or ammo) in nearly every agreement. Granted, these restrictions referred to ebranch or your personal computer or smartphone, but such terms usually indicate into which direction they're heading. In other words, you could still purchase a gun by withdrawing money; writing a check; or using a debit card unless restrictions have been placed in these areas, too. Not good unless truly local banks, who serve their customers, continue. Since I'm hoping to relocate to Idaho in the near future, I didn't bother changing banks.

  • @josephdollar9541
    @josephdollar9541 29 днів тому +18

    Pull it all out