Or simply take it directly from the Officer Pension pool… so it won’t only affect the officers committing infractions, but it will force all other officers to act and speak up since their pension will be directly affected by the loss of income due to settlements for other officers.
@@Spidouzthe insurance would be enough, coming after someone's pension isn't what we should do. Now there should be things that insurance Dosnt cover and the coo would have to pay directly legally and financially.
It definitely is and that ticket would have been null and void unless you have a judge who is in lockstep with police instead of interpreting the law for what its intended for.
@@monkeymeemee3053 let's say for sake of argument he wasn't confrontational but still exercised his right to remain silent. if, at that point, the officer said "youre being difficult, i was gonna give you a warning, now youre getting a ticket." would you consider that retaliatory? just wondering
I'm waiting for someone to tell one of these assholes they are a fucking coward when say it is for officer safety when confronting an unarmed victim of their harassment.
@@georgedunkelberg5004 while I'm with you for dunking on the dickhead cop, taking out the double negatives just means, "I pull people over for a reason." So it really doesn't make sense to bring that up.
Remember that our legal system deems all previous cases of corrupt or rabid police officers as still valid, knowing that they most certainly put innocent people behind bars. The courts will not help you unfortunately.
Heirs from "Hitler's Willing Executioners"--- Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust. by Daniel Jonah Goldhagen How 'they became evolution-ized through slavery's economic imperatives: to US LEOs?
For those who know better to stand around and watch a fellow cop stepping all over a citizen’s rights and do nothing, contributes to the problem on equal footing with the offender.
Correct. because the rest of that thought is "I wasn't going to write a ticket BUT you pissed me off and questioned my authority. So I AM going to write a ticket to assert my power over you". If he did wrong, write the ticket. If he didn't, LET IT GO.
At least he tried to get the first officer to stop what he was doing. The 2nd officer should not get in trouble for trying his best to say the first officer is wrong in his own words the best he can.
"You're gonna be all over UA-cam" "Yeah, but usually I just violate their rights" That douche is a serial offender, pulling people over to ID and fish.
That kind of stuff will never till the training facility trains them about civil and constitutional rights of civilians. But some officers just don't give a shit even when properly trained.
Well, the barber puts a straight razor to your neck to make it as smooth as a baby's butt without blood. Police never put a straight razor to your neck. Or aren't supposed to anyway. That's one thought. For me with policing, it's the psych eval and moral value system combined #1. #2 is physical fitness and ability. Should come pretty ready, and not need much time. #3 is ability to handle and maintain a gun effectively and safely...should already have that experience with some need to for work, but not much to get going. That should have been built up. #4 is knowing the laws, and protocols well so you do the right things and avoid the wrong things. #5 is how to prep and wear the uniform, handle administrative duties, customs and courtesies, etc. Most of those come ready. You learn the laws and uniform and tools and customs in the 6 weeks in and out of the classroom. You work on but should already be fit and handy with a pistol and rifle. So that is just verification. Then you continue to learn after that. There is no way in hell the training time can afford to be that much of a barrier of entry to get the right people through. There used to be nothing. The thing you are looking for is not working with the WRONG people in the first place. You can vote a Sheriff in with zero time, and that is the law. That guy is now Sheriff with or without history. Sometimes, people want that because they want a law-abiding, constitutionist in there making decisions erroring on the side of the citizen, figuring it out as they go. There is some wisdom to that. That's getting to know the right person for the job. That's evaluating correctly. You can't take this guy and put him through 18 months of training and make him change who and what he is.
All these officers need to share the crime. This is threatening violence by an armed group of men. This officer is mentally unstable how he can be law enforcement in the first place.
Yeah, how do you think he qualified to become a cop? They're not hired for their intelligence, and certainly not good looks. I mean if they could be trained they probably would have at least qualified as infantry.
Been doing this 12 years not the first time, yet he still doesn’t care or even understand the law. He is going to do it his way no matter what is legal or not legal. He has to be fired!
officer is just a rage, happy trigger dude ready to explode and kill at any minute.. smh.. he needs help and should not seek this type of profession cause the officer is a danger to the society..smh crazy man with a gun and badge
He has immunity for anything he does wrong he has the city county or whatever to pay for any lawsuits that may come about for his actions so he doesn't care what he does he just does whatever he wants to do and lets the courts sort it out and I guarantee you he's got a lot more people he's tried to press charges on that have been dropped then he does people that have been convicted
The "criminal" in Criminal Justice System refers to them as being the real criminals. Legal road piracy. Legal kidnapping. Legal theft of your hard earned cash.
This “officer safety” argument is nothing more than a loophole allowing officers with malicious intent to violate constitutional rights, and provides opportunity to use excessive force. If officer safety is a concern, then stay home, get a desk job, or become a beautician (which by the way requires more training than is required to become a cop). I have NEVER seen or heard of a firefighter refusing to enter a burning building due to firefighter safety concerns. They risk life and limb daily to serve their community and save lives, while cops harass, intimidate, bully, and abuse innocent civilians to satisfy their oversized egos. This is why communities love firefighters and have unfavorable feelings toward cops.
He extended the length of the traffic stop trying to find something to ticket him for. This, in and of itself is a violation of his rights and has been ruled on in the courts.
I bet this dept doesn't have a internal affairs devision. This officer was concerned about the driver having his dash cam activated & it would show the driver in compliance with the traffic laws. This officer almost stepped outside of his professional training & could have been sued.
They need to start taking any damages directly out of the police union’s retirement fund. Do it enough times they will start self policing and hopefully holding each other accountable for crossing that line.
Officer Safety: The worst weapon you can pull on an officer is a camera/cell phone. If they are threatened by a man standing in front of the squad car, armed with a phone, they are in the wrong line of work.
Watching these, it always cracks me up that only the bad cops are threatened by a camera. Good cops are just like "go ahead and record, you have every right to"
I honestly wished you didn't mentioned that because a lot of people are freaked out about those coward scumbags and how they managed that tragic incident.
@@playstationgroup3413no you are wrong. People can speak all day it don't matter. You are just trying to reason with two sides. There is no two sides to this story. The egotistical officer is wrong and he knew he crossed a line as he ran back as soon as he have seen the guy's dash cam. Ow, he ran back real quick. 😂😂😂.
@@mjabdinoorno I think you’re just ignorant honestly. The guy you replied to is right, at some points you should not say anything because it’ll be better for you but also what he said is that he has every right to say what he wants. You just want to argue with someone for no reason 😂
Since the money does not come from their accounts they don't care I think the payments should be smaller in most cases when cops are in wrong for minor offences but the cash should come from their garnished wages and or pension if it applies Police could only afford a wrongfull arrest 1 b4 they start to care more about the law and less about the power trip
I live in a small town. I've lived in big cities most of my life. That said, I haven't seen of cops here ever treat anyone poorly. The Chief even took a pay cut to keep officers on the (small) force. Nicest guy you would want to meet. Some small towns? Yeah, I'm glad to live where I do.
@tmo2798 . The pledge of allegiance was a pledge to sly enslavement. White people, and now even us, are a victim to the degradation of family; by promotion of the 'State'. We're buying them treats, no. They buy themselves 'treats' and cry after we didn't buy them another. I'm not even old enough to have grandkids.
This officer has been made famous for this clip making its rounds around the Internet. The cop is immature, unprofessional, rude, violent, and a coward. In short, his employment makes the public less safe.
Hmmm... I'm troubled by the implications of your question. Are you suggesting that a citizen being "rude" to an aggressive police officer validates an illegal, violent reaction from the police? @@ChrisLHommedieu
@@ChrisLHommedieuThere is no law saying you have to be “Polite and respectful.” The driver broke NO LAWS yet had his rights violated. Do you SERIOUSLY not understand the situation???😂😂😂 WOW
@@ChrisLHommedieu Why the fuck would you be polite and respectful to a tyrant trampling your rights because he's trying to make his ticket quota and is only stymied once he literally verbally works out how fucked he will be if this goes to court, and then characterizes his cut-and-run from the situation as 'giving you (his victim) a break'? What goes through the mind of bootlickers like you? There are plenty of situations where crassness and anger is justified. This is one of them.
Imagine being scared of a dude recording with a cell phone camera with both hands while outfitted in kevlar bullet proof body armor and armed with a taser and handgun. Officer safety my ass.
This situation would have been much easier for the cop if this man had no dashcam or smartphone, didn’t know his rights, and cowered to his authority. That’s how it used to work in the old days. He has no concept of millions of views worldwide and how his criminality is converted into monetary profit on UA-cam. That’s how it works these days, and the sooner they understand the world they’re living in, the better it will be for everyone.
This officer has no idea how to do his job. It’s sad he brags about being written up and sued. Sad pathetic excuse of a police officer. But I’m sure that qualified immunity has saved him. End qualified immunity ASAP NO DIFF from officer safety than citizen safety
AND probbly most of his superior officers are ok with it as long as the suspect dont know the laws and cases that prove orherwize,BACK THE BLUE UNTIL IT HAPPENS TO YOU,i learned this early on- to cops pulled me over and tried to give me a dui,i refuzed the road side agillity test- went to station to take station breathalizer--passed the breathalizer-- then since they seen they f--ked up- they lied and had me take a agility test at the station-then said i was under influence of something- and without a blood test charged me with a lesser charge LYEING PIG TICKET.
Cop gets home that night ... Wife: "Hi honey. How was your day?" Cop: "If you say one more thing, I'm gonna take it as a threat and I'm gonna act accordingly."
Even admits he wasn't going to ticket, and admits there was no swerving so the stop was purely to ID and ego-stroke. Writing a ticket after the encounter is easily defeated as becoming _retaliatory_ for not giving up his rights. This LEO is an embarrassment, should be nowhere near a badge or any semblance of authority.
Maybe instead of saying, "Well, you can write a ticket; it will be his word against yours," implying that the cop who clearly lied would obviously win, He should have flat out said, "He didn't break the law. So obviously you should not write the ticket. If you knowingly lie on the ticket, that's perjury. And he can get the recording of this conversation and prove it in court." I guess they both forgot about the recordings.
Isn't by him saying, "I wasn't going to write you a ticket, but I am now" because he was talking back to the cop considered retaliatory? Seems like that would make the ticket unlawful.
@@krabysniper Exactly. Had he wrote it the guy that he stopped would have had a field day with that cop in court. Made him look a fool in front of a judge. Trust me, cops do not like being dressed down by a judge in a court room after a defense lawyer totally destroys them. I've seen it happen, it's not pretty.
"I smell weed, You're under arrest for resisting arrest, your description matches a suspect, stop resisting, I've been doing this a long time" ... i can't think of the rest right now.
The other cop seemed very reasonable. He talked the tyrant out of violating the auditors rights further. Could he have done more? Maybe, but he did more than 99% of cops would have. The liar tyrant cop needs fired and his ego checked.
I agree but a little torn cause although he did try, at the end of the day he was willing to stand by and watch an innocent person's rights be violated and seemed more concerned about being associated with a shitshow than in protecting the guys rights. He should have done more cause this guy could have ended up in a cell - essentially kidnapped. Deprived of his freedom. It's disturbing
Tased and unalived ..... could certainly have escalated to that point. Yelling at that man to STOP MOVING when the man was standing right in front of his cruiser ..... where he was told to stand!! @@rightsarentwrong
Yeah...but only because he knew they were beat with the cameras and the auditor. If that was me or you, both of them would have been like flies on shit and had us both thrown in jail and jammed up. Both these cops are useless gangsters in my book.
I’m a retired cop. I only had 18 years on. Weaving within your lane can be an ELEMENT of intoxicated driving. Alone I know of no citable offense so the tyrant likely did not have enough reasonable suspicion to affect the stop. Always demand a supervisor. If the supervisor shows up and continues the unlawful stop, it exposes further the deep pockets of the department indicating systemic problem. The department and public expect the cop to keep his cool. This cop almost lost it. The senior cop was being too easy on the tyrant cop. He was doing a disservice to everyone and should have been held to account. Remember the phrase ASKED AND ANSWERED when the cop repeatedly asks you a question and you answer with something he doesn’t want to hear. Remember a jury will see your words and conduct too. If you incite the cop, it could lesson your awarded damages. Same goes for his chain of command. If they think, damn, I’d get mad too, then they are more likely to sympathize with the tyrant and let him off easy and be more willing to let the lawyers battle it out. He bragged on the video he had 12 years on. It appears to be a small town and it appears he has limited “street survival” police training because as soon as you realize your SH1t is weak, you terminate the contact. A senior cop did me that favor once. I didn’t thank the senior cop although I was immensely grateful, I realized he did me a solid DOING HIS JOB and making sure I didn’t have a proverbial train wreck. Hopefully, this tyrant learned how to avoid embarrassing contacts like this in the future. For me? It took good progressive training coupled with on the job experience. I learned. Not as quick as some unfortunately. I had to take a few lumps.
How can a male cop even say “officer safety” without being so embarrassed?? He’s the one that’s supposed to throw himself in danger for others not be worried about his own ass!
The idiotic thing is - cops routinely pull people out of their cars “for Officer Safety,” then bitch & moan when they’re standing on the side of the road next to someone they fear! It would almost be laughable if it wasn’t so ridiculous…
officer safety trumps citizen safety. Supposedly cops are higher beings who's lives are more important than a regular person. Just ask a cop he'll tell you that.
Wtf?! Really??!! I live in Australia and I watch these videos because it’s mind blowing to me.. our police are bad but nowhere near this bad .. I think in USA they get trained to be more fearful of citizens because you can carry guns all the time there and we can’t really
it is because every 2 bit bully from high school that couldn't get a job anywhere else became a cop , and now after 911 all of them view the public as the next terrorist @@Auto..Payge.
BEST AUDIT VIDEO EVER! Why? Because it shows me that these cops know EXACTLY what they're doing. They are NOT merely stupid. They ARE consciously bullies and tyrants.
@@BanksydogIt fits. Stepping out of the car and it's an immediate horror movie. Attempts to strip away constitutional rights at every turn of conversation. It shouldn't be emphasized with music, but it's needed because of the melodrama created by a illegal traffic stop. That drama continues as the cops narrative becomes clear as conversation continues and cop is continually making statements of a full blown fool. Melodramatic like it or not. I don't particular favor such either. -----it's just their😅
@@wildboar7473I got a warning for calling the Russians the same damn thing! It wouldn't surprise me at all!! If someone gets offended from a comment 9 times outta 10 they will report you. Softies around here
The talk between the officers was CLEAR that they knew him filming was LEGAL in that state. They then conspired to find a way to violate the rights they knew existed. While discussion of possible KNOWN laws violated by the suspect is in fact an investigatory act, the belief that a civil right does not exist is in itself a violation of that civil right. Either it exists, or it does not. This is about 18 USC 241 and 18 USC 242. Both are federal felonies committed by government agents. BTW, turning off a cell phone which is recording is called SPOLIATION of evidence. This is in itself enough to prove any case against the officer. Also, the officer demanded that the suspect move to him, well. under 6 feet from him early on in the interaction. This was an attempt to bring him within range of easy attack and or to allow him to create a false claim against him. Later he tells the same suspect that. coming closer than 10 feet will be considered an attack on the officer. Then the officer reached into the truck and examines the camera....unlawful search clearly defined by SCOTUS. Place me on the JURY, I would award 1 million against the officer that made the stop and I would award 500K against the accompanying officer for not arresting and or stopping the first officer outright. This is exactly why there should be NO qualified immunity where a civil right was violated. It also proves that all violations of civil rights by any government employee should be paid through the retirement funds of all employees of that class.
He said he’s been doing this for 12 years!!! He’s been violating people’s first amendment rights for 12 years without being held accountable!!! When people say “not all police are bad,” they aren’t considering the chance that, in 12 years of violating people’s rights, no other officer that he’s worked with has called him out except this ONE officer!!!??? What the hell???
The fact he knows he will fight it in court knowing the ticket isnt even legal.... he admitted to wasting taxpayers money and resources... he literally admitted to being corrupt.
We are totally unconcerned with, (the stupidest lie that cops tell), "officer safety". What a joke! And again, the cops that let unlawful actions happen are in total complicity. A silent cop is just as guilty!!!! 12 years on the job and you do not know the law at all. Twelve years of lawlessness on behalf of this officer. That is damning....
What they get away with by using the ".... officer safety ...." excuse is getting way, way out of hand. There is zero accountability and respect for the police is waning quickly.
Too often they will bump you or touch you and when you reflexively touch them back to keep your balance you just "assaulted" an officer and face down on the concrete you go.
If the other officer knows what's going on he should have told him outright, "You are dancing like a puppet for him man. This is exactly what he wants. Keep going and he's going to make 50,000 dollars.".
Is he on their radar? Why would they have so many previous interactions with him? You have to go out of your way to get pulled over, yet this guy gets lit up multiple times in a short period of time? Sounds like this PD pulls over people looking for something to tag them with. And why, for a simple traffic ticket would they take him out of his car? Just write a ticket and move on…
1. He pulled him over saying he was veering within the lane which is not a violation of any law, then said to his partner he was unsure if he was really veering. 2. Once he told his partner he was unsure, he continued contemplating writing the ticket. 3. If the officer is unsure about the recording legality, he cannot continue holding him there while he Googles it. The officer should be certain and confident when making accusations. Detainment while you’re fishing on Google is likely considered holding someone beyond reasonable time to conduct an investigation because it’s not an investigation, it’s legal research. SCOTUS already ruled on that. 4. With nothing else to go on, the officer nearly arrested him for an “officer safety” concern and continued to mention it after his partner told him the guy wasn’t a threat from previous interactions with him. This is 100% police misconduct and a violation of multiple constitutional rights. This officer should’ve been fired for this.
Okay first of all veering within your lane can be grounds for valid probable cause to pull someone over you don't have to exit your lane to have done something that would rise to the level of probable cause for a stop. He could be drunk or he could be sleeping or he could be distracted and he one of those three things would cause somebody to potentially veer and if they catch themselves fast enough stay within their lane However that aside the reason they use such an excuse is because it's not articulable you see the Fourth amendment does not require you to have reasonable suspicion The reasonable suspicion requirement is a fiction created by the courts that is not lawful it has to be an articulable reasonable suspicion they always forget that ever critical articulable part even notice the what was it Louisiana? Law that he quoted dropped the word articulated which makes that law illegal because that law violates the Fourth amendment which requires the reasonable suspicion to be articulable This is why no matter what scotus says drug sniffing dogs are not valid probable cause because it's not articulable this is why I smell alcohol or I smell marijuana is not constitutionally probable cause because it's not articulable it's just an opinion that you toss out there that cannot be challenged or disputed if you can't challenge or dispute it then it cannot be articulated in this context This is why the officer chose that reason because it's ambiguous because it cannot be defended against easily which is why he tried to cover his own ass when he noticed the guy actually had a dash cam and came up with the absolute total BS oh the angle that dash cam won't show it you could point that dash cam straight up into the sky and it'll show if you're veering because the POV of the camera will move he just has no clue how cameras actually work and is now playing CYA or cover your ass because he's stupid. This is why I tell everybody to run a dash cam I won't get in the car without a dash cam I even have a portable unit super micro that I carry with me when I travel by airplane so if I rent a car I can put my dash cam in the car because I won't drive a car without a dash cam I don't play this your word against my word b******* no it's my facts against your b******* that we're going to play. You can buy a cheap dash cam off Amazon for less than 40 bucks it doesn't have to be very good it doesn't even have to be very clear it just needs to show relative motion and stuff like that you can buy a 4K dash cam for a $34 just set it to 1080p and then you spend five bucks for a memory card later on spend the $15 to get a high endurance memory card if you're short on cash because the regular memory cards will burn up pretty quick when you use them as a dash cam medium they're just not designed to be recorded that much over and over and over again The high endurance cards can handle that better The reason they like to use veering within your lane as a reason to stop somebody is because they don't think you can prove you weren't veering within your lane it's not articulable it might be reasonable suspicion but it's not articulable therefore the stop is not legal The problem is the courts refused to enforce this fact The courts will accept his reason as articulable even though it's not. Even the cop stated that his reason was unlawful and unreasonable listen to what the cop said he moved toward the center line before making his turn then he didn't do it after that? What? What the f*** was that? What do you mean he moved toward the center line before making his turn now that's called kind of a duh That's kind of how you drive he was backpedaling at that point because he knew he was full of s*** and the other guy could prove it. The only parts I disagree with is there wasn't enough resistance stand in front of my car no I will not I refuse turn the face my car no I will not I refuse to comply put your hands on your head no I will not I refuse to comply I will match your force with force of equal force if you move up the force escalation chart I will move up the chart with you and defend myself if you stay peaceful I will stay peaceful this is not negotiable it's not up for discussion it's not up for debate You're not in charge here you don't get to say if you use force against me I will use equal force against you. You're allowed to pat me down I do not have to comply with the positioning of my body when you do so no I will not spread my legs no I will not lace my fingers on my head no I will not put my camera down no I will not face the car I'm going to look you straight in the face while you pat me down Don't take another step toward me take a step toward him do not give me orders. Say that again I'll consider it a threat I would then repeat myself I am your worst nightmare what the f*** are you going to do about it? I am not going to give you one inch I'm going to defy every unlawful order you give me I'm going to do the opposite of what you command me to do I'm going to make it crystal clear you are not in charge here.
An interesting tidbit... a guy with two hands on a cell phone has both hands occupied and is paying attention to his cell phone. As for officer safety, so long as the officer is doing things in a lawful manner, I would think that would actually enhance officer safety. Hands holding onto a cell phone are not reaching for anything. Yeah, it is a bit obnoxious when you just want to have a bit of a conversation with someone and they point a cell phone at you. I get that, too. I find it sad that law abiding citizens are becoming enemies of LEO's. Seems like we should be on the same side, not enemies.
Mandatory police officer insurance. Remove qualified immunity. When a cop breaks the law, he pays and NOT the tax payer!
Or simply take it directly from the Officer Pension pool… so it won’t only affect the officers committing infractions, but it will force all other officers to act and speak up since their pension will be directly affected by the loss of income due to settlements for other officers.
@@Spidouz Ya that's a great Idea. The Good Police officers will keep the bad cops in line like they should be doing now.
Can I give this a million likes!
@@Spidouzthe insurance would be enough, coming after someone's pension isn't what we should do. Now there should be things that insurance Dosnt cover and the coo would have to pay directly legally and financially.
Unfortunately that'll never happen in Merica
"I was gonna give you a warning, now I'm gonna write you a ticket." Isn't that a perfect example of retaliation?
It definitely is and that ticket would have been null and void unless you have a judge who is in lockstep with police instead of interpreting the law for what its intended for.
NO,ITS FREE speach
@@mjabdinoorit’s Louisiana, the judges are worse than the cops! They don’t care about the law, they do what they want!
no that is what happens when u r confrontational THE COP HAS Discretion.
@@monkeymeemee3053 let's say for sake of argument he wasn't confrontational but still exercised his right to remain silent. if, at that point, the officer said "youre being difficult, i was gonna give you a warning, now youre getting a ticket." would you consider that retaliatory? just wondering
"I've been doing this for 12 years." Twelve years of harassing, bullying and intimidating citizens.
Exactly
12 years and still dont know the law? tell me genius how many years of high school do they require there?
Lol he can't make his quota otherwise 😂 he's both a shitty person and officer
I know right? Wouldn’t you love 5 minutes alone with a pos like that without his badge and buddies to cover his crap. He’s a waste of oxygen.
He surely meant hes been doing this (being alive) for 12 years 😂
It's laughable that a fully armed cop is worried about officer safety by a guy armed with a cell phone.
The reason he is worried about a cell phone is because he doesn't want his lawlessness recorded.
That accountability is dangerous for cops.
I'm waiting for someone to tell one of these assholes they are a fucking coward when say it is for officer safety when confronting an unarmed victim of their harassment.
He already Frisked, the pig already knows that he doesn’t have any weapons and he’s making up officer safety lol 😢pig!!!
It's a standard lie for those tyrants.
"I don't pull people over for no reason" - the other cop immediately scratches his head - classic betrayal.
😂😂😂🎉
Gold!
The use of Doubled negative words, is a tell tale, for LEOs- Academy Student Successes! The tailless Willing Executioners appeasing's with zest!
@@georgedunkelberg5004 while I'm with you for dunking on the dickhead cop, taking out the double negatives just means, "I pull people over for a reason." So it really doesn't make sense to bring that up.
I can't imagine what went on before cellphone cameras. Well maybe I can.
*"I wasn't going to write him a ticket... until he bruised my delicate ego."*
Exactly. And then use "officer safety" when in reality it was entirely based on "damaged ego."
Hurt his wittle feewlwings😥
100%! How can they do this without any consequences is beyond me! They need to be held accountable!
If he would have been by himself this would have got ugly fast.
Exactly!
Just imagine all the misconduct this lame officier has pulled on less informed citizens. What a disgusting human being.
Confessing to their crimes ,why aren't these tyrants in protective custody, in prison?? Why?
Remember that our legal system deems all previous cases of corrupt or rabid police officers as still valid, knowing that they most certainly put innocent people behind bars. The courts will not help you unfortunately.
@@ThomasJordan-v4sbecause nobody can hold them accountable!
Exactly , 100%
Heirs from "Hitler's Willing Executioners"--- Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust. by Daniel Jonah Goldhagen How 'they became evolution-ized through slavery's economic imperatives: to US LEOs?
This cop broke more laws than a normal citizen would on any given day
SHUTTING OFF A RECORDING DEVICE DURING ILLEGAL ACTION, IS DESTRUCTION OF EVIDENCE.
Yup and against us code and deprecation of rights under color of law
Yup, felony.
Right?
Yeah and it should be a MANDATORY MINIMUM PRISON SENTENCE
Pigs are stinky
The second officer’s body language the whole time was, “Dude, cut it out!” 😂
But he never took action. He should be the other officer's cellmate.
For those who know better to stand around and watch a fellow cop stepping all over a citizen’s rights and do nothing, contributes to the problem on equal footing with the offender.
😂
He so badly wanted to speak up but ultimately he was a pussy
HOW THE OFFICER FEELS , ABOUT THE MAN APPROACHING HIM ,
IS IRRELEVANT . THE LAW IS WHAT MATTERES , NOT HIS FEELINGS .
That cop needs to be mentally evaluated.
He has been. He was assessed as a psychopath, that's why he was hired.
@@terencewbird2410🤣🤣😂🤭👌
Cops don't become psychopaths but psychopaths do become cops
@@terencewbird2410😂 lol
He NEEDS to be fired.
The man is beyond desperate to find a reason to make an arrest!! It’s actually terrifying!
The fact that he states he “wasn’t” going to write a ticket turns this whole thing around into retaliation if you ask me.
Correct. because the rest of that thought is "I wasn't going to write a ticket BUT you pissed me off and questioned my authority. So I AM going to write a ticket to assert my power over you". If he did wrong, write the ticket. If he didn't,
LET IT GO.
Ditto
Officer One: "can i arrest a person for being mean to me and recording me doing my job poorly?"
officer two and the internet: "No."
"Officer two" and he "internet"! ROFLMFAO!!! Like saying "the government" or "the church"! Meaningless! ha ha ha
Orificer 2 said "it's up to u".
@@ralph3333 true but that's just official-ese for "Im not going to associate with this, it's all you"
@@Romanji
Well, it is entertaining when they get other orificers n supervisors to self incriminate themselves. Talk about baiting.🤣
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
I love the "It's your word against his. Either way, it's going all over youtube." 😂
Lol, and here we are.. 👋😁 hi officer scumbag..
He must not have realized he'd subpoena those bodycams and put it on there as well huh
@@jonrice21 he is not the smartest gun in the armory ^^
I was told that ,after getting pullover for no reason.
He bash my tail light smug as fock I've had interactions with him before.
The video was great!
That cop appears to be a big chicken. He should lose his qualified immunity.
His partner repeatedly tried to get him to, "Leave it TF alone, Man!" 😂😂😂
Lmfao 😂 he sure did , but you know …you can’t fix stupid.
@@billtalbert6165 😂😂😂 FACTS!!! LOL!!
At least he tried to get the first officer to stop what he was doing. The 2nd officer should not get in trouble for trying his best to say the first officer is wrong in his own words the best he can.
@@kingjameswilliamhowitt oh, no doubt! Completely agree. The 2nd officer should absolutely not get in trouble over that!
"You're gonna be all over UA-cam"
"Yeah, but usually I just violate their rights"
That douche is a serial offender, pulling people over to ID and fish.
This criminal in a costume violating the rights of a free man should be treated accordingly.
That kind of stuff will never till the training facility trains them about civil and constitutional rights of civilians.
But some officers just don't give a shit even when properly trained.
I love how "Stop resisting" morphed into "officer safety" once the general public all had cameras lol
Exactly.
"Stop Resisting" is what these cowards say when they're trying to dislocate someone's shoulder
I applied to be a cop but they found out my folks were married, so they knew I couldn't be a bastard 😂
😂😂😂
Gold 😂
It takes 6 weeks to graduate from the police academy, but it takes 18 months to get a barber's license, make it make sense
Well, the barber puts a straight razor to your neck to make it as smooth as a baby's butt without blood. Police never put a straight razor to your neck. Or aren't supposed to anyway. That's one thought. For me with policing, it's the psych eval and moral value system combined #1. #2 is physical fitness and ability. Should come pretty ready, and not need much time. #3 is ability to handle and maintain a gun effectively and safely...should already have that experience with some need to for work, but not much to get going. That should have been built up. #4 is knowing the laws, and protocols well so you do the right things and avoid the wrong things. #5 is how to prep and wear the uniform, handle administrative duties, customs and courtesies, etc.
Most of those come ready. You learn the laws and uniform and tools and customs in the 6 weeks in and out of the classroom. You work on but should already be fit and handy with a pistol and rifle. So that is just verification. Then you continue to learn after that. There is no way in hell the training time can afford to be that much of a barrier of entry to get the right people through. There used to be nothing. The thing you are looking for is not working with the WRONG people in the first place. You can vote a Sheriff in with zero time, and that is the law. That guy is now Sheriff with or without history. Sometimes, people want that because they want a law-abiding, constitutionist in there making decisions erroring on the side of the citizen, figuring it out as they go. There is some wisdom to that. That's getting to know the right person for the job. That's evaluating correctly. You can't take this guy and put him through 18 months of training and make him change who and what he is.
And nowhere does it teach common sense in barber, police or anything. Human decency is not seen here.
Barbering actually requires intelligence
@peterd9940 Obviously it doesn't take intelligence to be a cop.
@@Michael-ii9fsi aint reading allat
He's bragging about how long he has been doing this wrong and hasn't learned anything about the law yet. He is not trainable.
All these officers need to share the crime. This is threatening violence by an armed group of men.
This officer is mentally unstable how he can be law enforcement in the first place.
Yeah, how do you think he qualified to become a cop? They're not hired for their intelligence, and certainly not good looks. I mean if they could be trained they probably would have at least qualified as infantry.
Right and bragging about how he has been sued before
Exactly - bragging how many times he had had to go to court.
This is going on in Australia every day from every cop it's horrible
Been doing this 12 years not the first time, yet he still doesn’t care or even understand the law. He is going to do it his way no matter what is legal or not legal. He has to be fired!
He knows he might get some extra paid time off.
because he won't have to pay the penalty , his city will .
officer is just a rage, happy trigger dude ready to explode and kill at any minute.. smh.. he needs help and should not seek this type of profession cause the officer is a danger to the society..smh crazy man with a gun and badge
He has immunity for anything he does wrong he has the city county or whatever to pay for any lawsuits that may come about for his actions so he doesn't care what he does he just does whatever he wants to do and lets the courts sort it out and I guarantee you he's got a lot more people he's tried to press charges on that have been dropped then he does people that have been convicted
The "criminal" in Criminal Justice System refers to them as being the real criminals. Legal road piracy. Legal kidnapping. Legal theft of your hard earned cash.
This “officer safety” argument is nothing more than a loophole allowing officers with malicious intent to violate constitutional rights, and provides opportunity to use excessive force. If officer safety is a concern, then stay home, get a desk job, or become a beautician (which by the way requires more training than is required to become a cop). I have NEVER seen or heard of a firefighter refusing to enter a burning building due to firefighter safety concerns. They risk life and limb daily to serve their community and save lives, while cops harass, intimidate, bully, and abuse innocent civilians to satisfy their oversized egos. This is why communities love firefighters and have unfavorable feelings toward cops.
He extended the length of the traffic stop trying to find something to ticket him for. This, in and of itself is a violation of his rights and has been ruled on in the courts.
this
It’s called fabrication and attempting to escalate the dispute d he can justify shooting the individual because his ego got bruised!
Courts are meaningless on the streets!
So basically, he admitted to having been violating people's rights for the past 12 years. All his stops and cases should be reviewed..
That would be a waste of taxpayers' money
A waste of money protecting you and you rights are you fucking stupid
@@jeffreystegwell-es2ig
@@jeffreystegwell-es2igwould be better use than siphoning money to Ukraine to pay back Biden backers.
I bet this dept doesn't have a internal affairs devision. This officer was concerned about the driver having his dash cam activated & it would show the driver in compliance with the traffic laws. This officer almost stepped outside of his professional training & could have been sued.
Whatever you’re comfortable paying for!
This man is a danger to society but he has a badge and gun. We are doomed
Well yeah, you just described a cop, they all are like that.
Officer safety is his name 😅😅
I'm not doomed. I'm prepared.
I have never seen it so flagrant. This is 6th grade bully crap.
He has the mental fortitude of a school bully, an ego of a 4 year old, I pray he doesn't use his gun because of his feelings got hurt.
Now I Understand why they say DEFUND THE POLICE !!!
I’m sad it took you so long but welcome! 💕
These are the people willing to work cheap just for the power trip.
They need to start taking any damages directly out of the police union’s retirement fund. Do it enough times they will start self policing and hopefully holding each other accountable for crossing that line.
Hope he never needs a cop.
@TheLarrymaysey what do they do again?
The way that cop painted his self into that corner was just beautiful. WoW
And it is crazy that they know they are recording themselves but continue to conspire against the public.
Dumb!!!!
@@oso9809agreed but most citizens don’t challenge police and don’t request police bodycam footage. So officers get away with this behavior A LOT.
@@oso9809 Remember that the cops edit there body cam videos to make them look good. And take years to get sometimes.
his self? eNgLiSh WoW
First Amendment corrupt conspiring cop
Officer Safety: The worst weapon you can pull on an officer is a camera/cell phone. If they are threatened by a man standing in front of the squad car, armed with a phone, they are in the wrong line of work.
Thank God an acorn didn't fall on top of the car during this incident.
cameras, dogs and BB guns
Officer safety is a joke of a justification anyway. Cops aren't even in the top 10 dangerous jobs.
@dustinb1070 I watched and shared that video about an hour ago.
Watching these, it always cracks me up that only the bad cops are threatened by a camera. Good cops are just like "go ahead and record, you have every right to"
If a cop doesn't want you recording him as he's about to approach you, that's a good time to have your spidey senses at maximum capacity.
Just reported your comment buddy.
@@JayR-v5p For what? That seems excessive.
There should be a
“BADGE”
that police officers “MUST WEAR”
showing they have been
“PREVIOUSLY HARASSED/ ASSAULTED CITIZENS”
A perfect example of _"Who does he think he's talking to?! I'm going to show him who's the boss! Let me find something I can write him a ticket for!"_
These unlawful and unconstitutional police actions need to be nationally televised. People need to know the truth.
Cops in Uvalde did an excellent job of ensuring officer safety.
💯💯💯
NEVER FORGET ABOUT THOSE POOR KIDS!!!!!😢😢😢😢😢😢 FUCKIN COWARDS!!!!!😮😮😮
Brave cops
Kops are just afraid of cameras as they are of active shooters. 💯
I honestly wished you didn't mentioned that because a lot of people are freaked out about those coward scumbags and how they managed that tragic incident.
Citizens should be able to sue cops. They have a pension.
Officer safety? He wouldn't be standing in front of your car if you didn't illegally pull him over, officer. Absolute disgrace.
The cop couldn’t think fast enough for a lawful reason as to WHY he pulled him over, then got scared.
I laughed so hard as soon he noticed the dash-cam and ran back to his cruiser with the most fake bravado. "I WILL WRITE YOUR TICKET" Lmao
The person in question should shut his mouth at some points. 🤔🤔 But . . . the person has a right to speak his mind.
@@playstationgroup3413no you are wrong. People can speak all day it don't matter. You are just trying to reason with two sides. There is no two sides to this story. The egotistical officer is wrong and he knew he crossed a line as he ran back as soon as he have seen the guy's dash cam. Ow, he ran back real quick. 😂😂😂.
Within 2 minutes the trash cop is lying regarding cell phone camera. Nothing cop says is thus believable. Belongs on Brady list.
@@mjabdinoorno I think you’re just ignorant honestly. The guy you replied to is right, at some points you should not say anything because it’ll be better for you but also what he said is that he has every right to say what he wants. You just want to argue with someone for no reason 😂
The fact that they hold being sued as a badge of honor is terrifying. These kind of cops need to be in prison.
Since the money does not come from their accounts they don't care
I think the payments should be smaller in most cases when cops are in wrong for minor offences but the cash should come from their garnished wages and or pension if it applies
Police could only afford a wrongfull arrest 1 b4 they start to care more about the law and less about the power trip
Worse.
Crooked small town cops are a real problem here in America.
I live in a small town. I've lived in big cities most of my life.
That said, I haven't seen of cops here ever treat anyone poorly. The Chief even took a pay cut to keep officers on the (small) force. Nicest guy you would want to meet.
Some small towns? Yeah, I'm glad to live where I do.
the cop being so disappointed that he cant hit this dude with an arrest or a hard ticket is scary...
Toxic Authority. This guy has no business being in law enforcement.
Toxic authority, exercising evil, unrighteous dominion, over innocent people. What a sickening performance of an officer. Shameful.
That's part of the problem, law enforcement IS a 'business'. From traffic ticket scams to civil forfeiture. These crooks are worse than redcoats.
@tmo2798 . The pledge of allegiance was a pledge to sly enslavement. White people, and now even us, are a victim to the degradation of family; by promotion of the 'State'. We're buying them treats, no. They buy themselves 'treats' and cry after we didn't buy them another. I'm not even old enough to have grandkids.
Extending the stop to search for false charges. That second cop did a great job. This cop is a punk
Theyre all punks they didn't stop each other.
Not writing a ticket.... this is UNCONSTITUTIONAL in EVERY WAY
This officer has been made famous for this clip making its rounds around the Internet. The cop is immature, unprofessional, rude, violent, and a coward. In short, his employment makes the public less safe.
and the complete opposite is true as well... His LACK of employment will make the public WAY SAFER.
And the driver is polite and respectful?
Hmmm... I'm troubled by the implications of your question. Are you suggesting that a citizen being "rude" to an aggressive police officer validates an illegal, violent reaction from the police? @@ChrisLHommedieu
@@ChrisLHommedieuThere is no law saying you have to be “Polite and respectful.” The driver broke NO LAWS yet had his rights violated. Do you SERIOUSLY not understand the situation???😂😂😂 WOW
@@ChrisLHommedieu Why the fuck would you be polite and respectful to a tyrant trampling your rights because he's trying to make his ticket quota and is only stymied once he literally verbally works out how fucked he will be if this goes to court, and then characterizes his cut-and-run from the situation as 'giving you (his victim) a break'?
What goes through the mind of bootlickers like you? There are plenty of situations where crassness and anger is justified. This is one of them.
“Put your phone down?”
That says all you need to know about that cop.
Imagine being scared of a dude recording with a cell phone camera with both hands while outfitted in kevlar bullet proof body armor and armed with a taser and handgun. Officer safety my ass.
He's nothing but a coward.
“Home of the brave” indeed.
It is such BS....
Not to mention that he has a second officer, similarly equipped, on scene as backup.
With backup as well…
This situation would have been much easier for the cop if this man had no dashcam or smartphone, didn’t know his rights, and cowered to his authority. That’s how it used to work in the old days. He has no concept of millions of views worldwide and how his criminality is converted into monetary profit on UA-cam. That’s how it works these days, and the sooner they understand the world they’re living in, the better it will be for everyone.
This officer has no idea how to do his job. It’s sad he brags about being written up and sued. Sad pathetic excuse of a police officer. But I’m sure that qualified immunity has saved him. End qualified immunity ASAP NO DIFF from officer safety than citizen safety
AND probbly most of his superior officers are ok with it as long as the suspect dont know the laws and cases that prove orherwize,BACK THE BLUE UNTIL IT HAPPENS TO YOU,i learned this early on- to cops pulled me over and tried to give me a dui,i refuzed the road side agillity test- went to station to take station breathalizer--passed the breathalizer-- then since they seen they f--ked up- they lied and had me take a agility test at the station-then said i was under influence of something- and without a blood test charged me with a lesser charge LYEING PIG TICKET.
He needs to be fired but no, they all hang together backing each other up
Keep Q.I, Just take it from ALL of the agencies PENSION FUNDS.
Cop gets home that night ...
Wife: "Hi honey. How was your day?"
Cop: "If you say one more thing, I'm gonna take it as a threat and I'm gonna act accordingly."
Proceeding to kick the dog
Sadly some do
I bet he beats his wife
@@valeriecross9184statistically the most likely person to do that
😂😂😂
The incompetence runs really deep with this cop. What an embarrassment. He should not be on the force.
The other officers who witness these kind of stops are just as guilty
Sounded like this might be his second police force' I wonder why ?
It's not much of a 'force' anyway. They're redcoats. I bet you know how boots taste. 'The force'🤣🤞😂
Even admits he wasn't going to ticket, and admits there was no swerving so the stop was purely to ID and ego-stroke. Writing a ticket after the encounter is easily defeated as becoming _retaliatory_ for not giving up his rights. This LEO is an embarrassment, should be nowhere near a badge or any semblance of authority.
When cops speak in private, they are exactly what we know they are.
Not only is it an illegal detainment but he also extended and prolonged the detainment unnecessarily which is also against the law
Awfully stupid for having 12 yesrs of service. Get rid of qualified immunity.
Courts need to stop blindly believing cops. It’s clear they will lie plant evidence and murder.
All we heard was he did this for 12 years. Could have meant 12 years of being a bad cop, not his length of service. lol
Many "Veteran" cops spent their entire careers being ignorant.
The people needs qualified immunity from the stupid cops😂
Officer safety is not a law. Therefore, Officer safety is not a thing.
It never should be. Individual rights must be held above all.
It’s cops claim of cowardice.
Donuts used to be square but they cut the corners off for officer safety. 😂😂😂
IF THE OFFICER , FEELS UNSAFE PREFORMING IS JOB .
HE NEEDS TO SEEK EMPLOYMENT ELSEWHERE 🤨
@@Thunderchickenbr549THAT’S QUITE FUNNY 😄
if he was not going to write a ticket, and did not suspect him of DUI, there is no legal reason for the stop.
"Been doing this for 12 years. Not the first time I've dealt with this..." With what, stopping a free citizen to bully him?
Yes he said standard practice at his previous job as he was ordered was to take their phone and turn it off.
@@rifter0x0000 Then mute their own camera..
This cop just won't give up. Even his fellow officer is trying hard to tell him nicely to back off and he just can't let it go
Maybe instead of saying, "Well, you can write a ticket; it will be his word against yours," implying that the cop who clearly lied would obviously win, He should have flat out said, "He didn't break the law. So obviously you should not write the ticket. If you knowingly lie on the ticket, that's perjury. And he can get the recording of this conversation and prove it in court." I guess they both forgot about the recordings.
If you work at night best get a bumper sticker, name your vehicle and always leave the nintendo switch or netflix running.
Isn't by him saying, "I wasn't going to write you a ticket, but I am now" because he was talking back to the cop considered retaliatory? Seems like that would make the ticket unlawful.
Which is why he didn't write it. He knew he was busted and writing a ticket that had no bearing in truth would only make his hole deeper.
@@krabysniper Exactly. Had he wrote it the guy that he stopped would have had a field day with that cop in court. Made him look a fool in front of a judge. Trust me, cops do not like being dressed down by a judge in a court room after a defense lawyer totally destroys them. I've seen it happen, it's not pretty.
@@SternLX yes, I too have personally been involved in a case where I and my attorney made the local pd look like the 🤡s they were. I won.
"I smell weed, You're under arrest for resisting arrest, your description matches a suspect, stop resisting, I've been doing this a long time" ... i can't think of the rest right now.
The other cop seemed very reasonable. He talked the tyrant out of violating the auditors rights further. Could he have done more? Maybe, but he did more than 99% of cops would have. The liar tyrant cop needs fired and his ego checked.
I agree but a little torn cause although he did try, at the end of the day he was willing to stand by and watch an innocent person's rights be violated and seemed more concerned about being associated with a shitshow than in protecting the guys rights. He should have done more cause this guy could have ended up in a cell - essentially kidnapped. Deprived of his freedom. It's disturbing
Tased and unalived ..... could certainly have escalated to that point. Yelling at that man to STOP MOVING when the man was standing right in front of his cruiser ..... where he was told to stand!! @@rightsarentwrong
@@rightsarentwrong That's usually the outcome of bruising a cops ego.
Yeah...but only because he knew they were beat with the cameras and the auditor. If that was me or you, both of them would have been like flies on shit and had us both thrown in jail and jammed up. Both these cops are useless gangsters in my book.
This is typical of Denham Springs. I used to live there.
I LOOOOOVE that this video straight up quotes the Bill of Rights. We need more of that.
And actually the Bill of Rights is a good start, despite the Amendments. These redcoats don't like it at all.
I remember this one. This cop got threatened because he was scared of a guy saying he’ll have a bad dream.
I’m a retired cop.
I only had 18 years on.
Weaving within your lane can be an ELEMENT of intoxicated driving. Alone I know of no citable offense so the tyrant likely did not have enough reasonable suspicion to affect the stop.
Always demand a supervisor. If the supervisor shows up and continues the unlawful stop, it exposes further the deep pockets of the department indicating systemic problem.
The department and public expect the cop to keep his cool. This cop almost lost it.
The senior cop was being too easy on the tyrant cop. He was doing a disservice to everyone and should have been held to account.
Remember the phrase ASKED AND ANSWERED when the cop repeatedly asks you a question and you answer with something he doesn’t want to hear.
Remember a jury will see your words and conduct too. If you incite the cop, it could lesson your awarded damages. Same goes for his chain of command. If they think, damn, I’d get mad too, then they are more likely to sympathize with the tyrant and let him off easy and be more willing to let the lawyers battle it out.
He bragged on the video he had 12 years on. It appears to be a small town and it appears he has limited “street survival” police training because as soon as you realize your SH1t is weak, you terminate the contact. A senior cop did me that favor once. I didn’t thank the senior cop although I was immensely grateful, I realized he did me a solid DOING HIS JOB and making sure I didn’t have a proverbial train wreck.
Hopefully, this tyrant learned how to avoid embarrassing contacts like this in the future.
For me? It took good progressive training coupled with on the job experience. I learned. Not as quick as some unfortunately. I had to take a few lumps.
Without video, this cop would have gone full hands on.....
Assuming the cop wouldn’t have went straight to his service weapon without all the cameras
No doubt about it!
When the other cop told him the citizen will fight this in court, he was trying to warn him to watch what he says.
"And you're gonna be one of the slow ones that's just messed up". Comedic gold.
How can a male cop even say “officer safety” without being so embarrassed?? He’s the one that’s supposed to throw himself in danger for others not be worried about his own ass!
The idiotic thing is - cops routinely pull people out of their cars “for Officer Safety,” then bitch & moan when they’re standing on the side of the road next to someone they fear! It would almost be laughable if it wasn’t so ridiculous…
Oh you've not seen the cops in the texas school shooting? The official report ?
officer safety trumps citizen safety. Supposedly cops are higher beings who's lives are more important than a regular person. Just ask a cop he'll tell you that.
It's just an excuse to bully us. They cuff old ladies and children for "officer safety" for Pete's sake.
Police "Paranoid Fear" is a "Public Safety Hazard, and causes great concern to the private-sector common-citizen taxpayers and voters.
This is what the school bully does for a living when he gets older.
It's more like he got bullied at school and has a vendetta against people.
This cop was bullied in school and that’s why they become cops so they can treat civilians like garbage.
When a cop has a problem with someone recording we already know he has 0 integrity.
this is how police are in Louisiana in general. that is exactly why people here say "come on vacation, leave on probation"
Same in Florida.
Wtf?! Really??!! I live in Australia and I watch these videos because it’s mind blowing to me.. our police are bad but nowhere near this bad .. I think in USA they get trained to be more fearful of citizens because you can carry guns all the time there and we can’t really
it is because every 2 bit bully from high school that couldn't get a job anywhere else became a cop , and now after 911 all of them view the public as the next terrorist @@Auto..Payge.
Return on violation.
Hah! Same here in Monroe County Michigan.. That is literally the saying here. Come on vacation - Leave on probation.
BEST AUDIT VIDEO EVER! Why? Because it shows me that these cops know EXACTLY what they're doing. They are NOT merely stupid. They ARE consciously bullies and tyrants.
Except the melodramatic music lol so ridiculous
@@BanksydogIt fits. Stepping out of the car and it's an immediate horror movie. Attempts to strip away constitutional rights at every turn of conversation. It shouldn't be emphasized with music, but it's needed because of the melodrama created by a illegal traffic stop. That drama continues as the cops narrative becomes clear as conversation continues and cop is continually making statements of a full blown fool. Melodramatic like it or not. I don't particular favor such either. -----it's just their😅
Blue Line Mafia
What a walking penis😂
As it finds out he's in trouble, the cop gets more pissed.😂
He admits he's been doing his job wrong for twelve years
If lawyers weren't so expensive the Cops would be forced to treat everyone with respect.
Truth. Should be at least a common sense test. Officer defiled position.
“Officer safety” is the same reason every cop in Uvalde used an excuse. Cowardice is taught to these tyrants.
Wonder if you got a YT warning about speech :)
UVALDE COPS ARE ALL COWARDS.
even worse was when people who actually had a spine were arrested when they tried to get into the school to stop that tragedy.
@@wildboar7473I got a warning for calling the Russians the same damn thing! It wouldn't surprise me at all!!
If someone gets offended from a comment 9 times outta 10 they will report you. Softies around here
It's not taught It's who they are.
Haha the cop saying he wasn’t gonna write him a ticket lol no he was gonna arrest you for dui. Tyrant cop
Voluntary compliance is encouraged by unhinged public servants regarding officer Safety concerns 🤷🤦🤥
The amount of frustration because he doesn't have complete control over another human being. Perceived power is all they have 🤣🤣🤣
Spot on. That runs their game.
Imagine that in a relationship, must be exciting lol
The other human is a complete prick. If you're swerving within the lane it's still evidence of possible impairment.
The talk between the officers was CLEAR that they knew him filming was LEGAL in that state. They then conspired to find a way to violate the rights they knew existed. While discussion of possible KNOWN laws violated by the suspect is in fact an investigatory act, the belief that a civil right does not exist is in itself a violation of that civil right. Either it exists, or it does not. This is about 18 USC 241 and 18 USC 242. Both are federal felonies committed by government agents.
BTW, turning off a cell phone which is recording is called SPOLIATION of evidence. This is in itself enough to prove any case against the officer. Also, the officer demanded that the suspect move to him, well. under 6 feet from him early on in the interaction. This was an attempt to bring him within range of easy attack and or to allow him to create a false claim against him. Later he tells the same suspect that. coming closer than 10 feet will be considered an attack on the officer.
Then the officer reached into the truck and examines the camera....unlawful search clearly defined by SCOTUS.
Place me on the JURY, I would award 1 million against the officer that made the stop and I would award 500K against the accompanying officer for not arresting and or stopping the first officer outright.
This is exactly why there should be NO qualified immunity where a civil right was violated. It also proves that all violations of civil rights by any government employee should be paid through the retirement funds of all employees of that class.
If you actually want justice I'm afraid you'll have to leave America. Justice was taken out to the woods and executed there years ago.
@@mikesanders8621Play me a song on the world's tiniest violin. Ever hear of the Black Panters in the 60s.
What tf do the panthers have to do with anything
@@mikesanders8621Meaning justice was dying decades ago.
@@migtvill I agree with you.
Get the $$$$, his job, pension and most of all his certification or this corrupt OAF-icer will just migrate and corrupt another PD somewhere else!
Cops hate it when their EGO’S GET CRUSHED. It’s also a “BUTT HURT” 😂😂😂👍🏻😢😢😢😂😂
There’s no room for cops who abuse their authority, and simply want to throw their weight around.
UNFORTUNATELY,
BULLIES ARE ATTRACTED TO THE POLICE 👮♀️ DEPARTMENT
JUST BECAUSE , THEY CAN AND DO ABUSE THEIR POWER .
He said he’s been doing this for 12 years!!! He’s been violating people’s first amendment rights for 12 years without being held accountable!!! When people say “not all police are bad,” they aren’t considering the chance that, in 12 years of violating people’s rights, no other officer that he’s worked with has called him out except this ONE officer!!!??? What the hell???
Dam it, he has a dash cam that proves I"m a liar! Damit, damit.....ROFLOL Get those dash cams going all!
He whooped that officer bad!!! officer, You just got your ego smashed into the turf.
😂😂😂😂😂haha
The fact he knows he will fight it in court knowing the ticket isnt even legal.... he admitted to wasting taxpayers money and resources... he literally admitted to being corrupt.
Thank God the second officer had common sense !
We are totally unconcerned with, (the stupidest lie that cops tell), "officer safety". What a joke! And again, the cops that let unlawful actions happen are in total complicity. A silent cop is just as guilty!!!! 12 years on the job and you do not know the law at all. Twelve years of lawlessness on behalf of this officer. That is damning....
What they get away with by using the ".... officer safety ...." excuse is getting way, way out of hand. There is zero accountability and respect for the police is waning quickly.
Too often they will bump you or touch you and when you reflexively touch them back to keep your balance you just "assaulted" an officer and face down on the concrete you go.
"Officer safety", and "Stop Resisting" are pig mantra to beat citizens as they please.
If the other officer knows what's going on he should have told him outright, "You are dancing like a puppet for him man. This is exactly what he wants. Keep going and he's going to make 50,000 dollars.".
@tindelljk You are so right, he had him dancing like a fool. 🤣🤣🤣
Tell them you're going to file a complaint or sue them and they laugh at you because they know there's no consequences.
No consequences for them, only the taxpayers. End qualified immunity now!
You may as well fight and resist on the street.
This is what cowards do when they're afraid to deal with real criminals.
Man I hope this cop gets fired. He is the absolute worst of the worst cops.
Really, you never seen what happened to George Floyd
You misspelled "got his ass beat"'.
It's hilarious that he had to google a law! 😂😂😂
What do you expect with only 6 mo of training??
@@SegoMan if that
“Either way you going all over UA-cam” 😂😂😂
Is he on their radar? Why would they have so many previous interactions with him? You have to go out of your way to get pulled over, yet this guy gets lit up multiple times in a short period of time? Sounds like this PD pulls over people looking for something to tag them with. And why, for a simple traffic ticket would they take him out of his car? Just write a ticket and move on…
"yOu JuSt MeSsEd Up"
Nah bro. You did.
Right to remain silent 😂 without being arrested.
I think every ticket this man sign needs to be investigated throughout his career as a tyrant
1. He pulled him over saying he was veering within the lane which is not a violation of any law, then said to his partner he was unsure if he was really veering.
2. Once he told his partner he was unsure, he continued contemplating writing the ticket.
3. If the officer is unsure about the recording legality, he cannot continue holding him there while he Googles it. The officer should be certain and confident when making accusations. Detainment while you’re fishing on Google is likely considered holding someone beyond reasonable time to conduct an investigation because it’s not an investigation, it’s legal research. SCOTUS already ruled on that.
4. With nothing else to go on, the officer nearly arrested him for an “officer safety” concern and continued to mention it after his partner told him the guy wasn’t a threat from previous interactions with him.
This is 100% police misconduct and a violation of multiple constitutional rights. This officer should’ve been fired for this.
Okay first of all veering within your lane can be grounds for valid probable cause to pull someone over you don't have to exit your lane to have done something that would rise to the level of probable cause for a stop. He could be drunk or he could be sleeping or he could be distracted and he one of those three things would cause somebody to potentially veer and if they catch themselves fast enough stay within their lane
However that aside the reason they use such an excuse is because it's not articulable you see the Fourth amendment does not require you to have reasonable suspicion The reasonable suspicion requirement is a fiction created by the courts that is not lawful it has to be an articulable reasonable suspicion they always forget that ever critical articulable part even notice the what was it Louisiana? Law that he quoted dropped the word articulated which makes that law illegal because that law violates the Fourth amendment which requires the reasonable suspicion to be articulable
This is why no matter what scotus says drug sniffing dogs are not valid probable cause because it's not articulable this is why I smell alcohol or I smell marijuana is not constitutionally probable cause because it's not articulable it's just an opinion that you toss out there that cannot be challenged or disputed if you can't challenge or dispute it then it cannot be articulated in this context
This is why the officer chose that reason because it's ambiguous because it cannot be defended against easily which is why he tried to cover his own ass when he noticed the guy actually had a dash cam and came up with the absolute total BS oh the angle that dash cam won't show it you could point that dash cam straight up into the sky and it'll show if you're veering because the POV of the camera will move he just has no clue how cameras actually work and is now playing CYA or cover your ass because he's stupid.
This is why I tell everybody to run a dash cam I won't get in the car without a dash cam I even have a portable unit super micro that I carry with me when I travel by airplane so if I rent a car I can put my dash cam in the car because I won't drive a car without a dash cam I don't play this your word against my word b******* no it's my facts against your b******* that we're going to play.
You can buy a cheap dash cam off Amazon for less than 40 bucks it doesn't have to be very good it doesn't even have to be very clear it just needs to show relative motion and stuff like that you can buy a 4K dash cam for a $34 just set it to 1080p and then you spend five bucks for a memory card later on spend the $15 to get a high endurance memory card if you're short on cash because the regular memory cards will burn up pretty quick when you use them as a dash cam medium they're just not designed to be recorded that much over and over and over again The high endurance cards can handle that better
The reason they like to use veering within your lane as a reason to stop somebody is because they don't think you can prove you weren't veering within your lane it's not articulable it might be reasonable suspicion but it's not articulable therefore the stop is not legal The problem is the courts refused to enforce this fact The courts will accept his reason as articulable even though it's not. Even the cop stated that his reason was unlawful and unreasonable listen to what the cop said he moved toward the center line before making his turn then he didn't do it after that? What? What the f*** was that? What do you mean he moved toward the center line before making his turn now that's called kind of a duh That's kind of how you drive he was backpedaling at that point because he knew he was full of s*** and the other guy could prove it.
The only parts I disagree with is there wasn't enough resistance stand in front of my car no I will not I refuse turn the face my car no I will not I refuse to comply put your hands on your head no I will not I refuse to comply I will match your force with force of equal force if you move up the force escalation chart I will move up the chart with you and defend myself if you stay peaceful I will stay peaceful this is not negotiable it's not up for discussion it's not up for debate You're not in charge here you don't get to say if you use force against me I will use equal force against you.
You're allowed to pat me down I do not have to comply with the positioning of my body when you do so no I will not spread my legs no I will not lace my fingers on my head no I will not put my camera down no I will not face the car I'm going to look you straight in the face while you pat me down Don't take another step toward me take a step toward him do not give me orders. Say that again I'll consider it a threat I would then repeat myself I am your worst nightmare what the f*** are you going to do about it? I am not going to give you one inch I'm going to defy every unlawful order you give me I'm going to do the opposite of what you command me to do I'm going to make it crystal clear you are not in charge here.
That “i’m unsure” was he askin if he’d back him up on it.
An interesting tidbit... a guy with two hands on a cell phone has both hands occupied and is paying attention to his cell phone. As for officer safety, so long as the officer is doing things in a lawful manner, I would think that would actually enhance officer safety. Hands holding onto a cell phone are not reaching for anything. Yeah, it is a bit obnoxious when you just want to have a bit of a conversation with someone and they point a cell phone at you. I get that, too.
I find it sad that law abiding citizens are becoming enemies of LEO's. Seems like we should be on the same side, not enemies.