This math question confused 97% of examinees | Be Careful!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 6 вер 2024
  • A great exponential equation. Solution.
    What do you think about this problem? Don't forget to like and subscribe to my channel for more helpful math tricks. Thanks For Watching!
    Check out my latest video (Can You Pass Harvard's Entrance Exam?): • Can You Pass Harvard's...
    If you're reading this ❤️. Thank You!
    Hello My Friend ! Welcome to my channel. I really appreciate it!
    ‪@higher_mathematics‬
    #maths #math

КОМЕНТАРІ • 28

  • @michaelf7093
    @michaelf7093 2 місяці тому +10

    Should mention that x=log ф

    • @984francis
      @984francis Місяць тому +1

      Wow! I actually understand that. Miracles will never cease.

  • @devondevon4366
    @devondevon4366 Місяць тому

    Answer x = log 1.61803 or 0.2089 or 0.21
    This is the golden ratio
    1^x + 10^ x =100^x
    1 + 10^x = 100^x (since 1^ any number = 1)
    0= 100^x - 10^x -1
    let 10^x = p
    Hence,
    0= p^2 - p -1
    Using the quadratic formulae and
    p = (1 + or -sqrt 5 )/2 or 1.61803 or -0.61803 Golden ratio
    Hence, 10^x = 1.61803 as you find the log a negative number, so disregard - 0.61803
    x log 10 = log 1.61803 find the log of both sides
    x = log 1.61803 or 0.2089865693 Answer

  • @kyintegralson9656
    @kyintegralson9656 Місяць тому +1

    For the 2nd root, we can choose for the branch cut of the logarithm in the complex plane one that's not on the half-line of non-positive reals. E.g., choose the branch cut on the upper imaginary line such that the argument of a complex number, θ, satisfies -3π/2

    • @Apollorion
      @Apollorion Місяць тому

      Shouldn't we instead of assuming -1=e^(iπ) or -1=e^(iπ) assume -1=e^(inπ) with n being any arbitrary odd integer ?

    • @kyintegralson9656
      @kyintegralson9656 Місяць тому

      @@Apollorion Yes, in solving y²-y-1=0 & then x, I think you can choose other branches of ln, as you suggest. A problem, though, is that the initial assumption 1^x=1 is not valid in general even for real x.

  • @marcellorossi-uf5du
    @marcellorossi-uf5du Місяць тому +1

    Y = 10^x ---> y^2 = y + 1

  • @prollysine
    @prollysine Місяць тому

    let u=10^x , u^2-u-1=0 , u=(1+V5)/2 , 10^x=(1+V5)/2 , x=ln((1+V5)/2)/ln10 , test , 1+10^(ln((1+V5)/2)/ln10)=~ 2.61803 ,
    100^(ln((1+V5)/2)/ln10)=2.61803 , same , OK ,

  • @kyintegralson9656
    @kyintegralson9656 Місяць тому

    The initial assumption 1^x=1 isn't valid in general, even for real x. E.g., 1^(½)=±1 or 1^(⅓) has complex roots. In fact, the solution presented contradicts this assumption, b/c
    x≅0.2 ⇒ 1^x≅e^(0.2·2niπ) for an integer n, which isn't equal to 1 if n≠0.
    So, we haven't fully solved the initial equation, even for real x.

    • @kyintegralson9656
      @kyintegralson9656 Місяць тому

      @TidakTerdefinisi 10^x, in general, isn't a single-valued function, & the notation is confusing this. Take the simpler example of 4^(½). It's double-valued. So when you right 4^(½)/4^(½), it's not clear if you're dividing the same branches of the square root or different ones. It could be 2/2 or (-2)/(-2) or 2/(-2) or (-2)/2. If you write √4/√4, then it's clear b/c that's the positive root.

    • @kyintegralson9656
      @kyintegralson9656 Місяць тому

      @TidakTerdefinisi In your notation, presumably, "a" is a fixed number; has a single value. But 10^x is not single-valued.
      Had you not mentioned it, wouldn't have known you're not a native English speaker.

    • @kyintegralson9656
      @kyintegralson9656 Місяць тому

      @TidakTerdefinisi The imaginary unit is typically defined as the positive root, i=√(-1).

  • @Bjowolf2
    @Bjowolf2 Місяць тому +2

    And once again the golden ratio shows up 😉

  • @RealQinnMalloryu4
    @RealQinnMalloryu4 Місяць тому

    100/1 = 100100/10=10 {100+10}= 110 10^10^10 2^52^52^5 1^1^1^1^2^1 2^1 (x ➖ 2x+1)

  • @louismallet3863
    @louismallet3863 Місяць тому

    as early as possible, set if we are working in Real or Complex

  • @williamlyerly3114
    @williamlyerly3114 2 місяці тому +2

    By inspection my guess was .2, but knew their were more trailing digits. Watched your solution and by slide rule .209

  • @ilana4444
    @ilana4444 2 місяці тому +2

    thanks for your lesson! The explanation is detailed and clear. Where can I see more of your lessons on other topics? Thank you in advance and good luck with everything.

  • @stephanegandelin6880
    @stephanegandelin6880 Місяць тому

    x.ln(1)+x.ln(10)=2.x.ln(10)
    Si x non égal à 0 alors 1=2 donc "x=0" 😅

  • @YamkumariDhakal-id3zm
    @YamkumariDhakal-id3zm 2 місяці тому +2

    I solved this problem really 😎
    without watching this video.

  • @QnotK
    @QnotK Місяць тому +1

    So whatdowehaverighthere😂…

  • @ScienceCodeCreations
    @ScienceCodeCreations 2 місяці тому

    Answer is ln(phi) / ln(10)
    That's what I got.

    • @user-wl4zu2ok1e
      @user-wl4zu2ok1e 2 місяці тому

      (log_e((1+sqrt(5))/2))/log_e(10) = log_10(1+sqrt(5))-log_10(2) .

    • @ScienceCodeCreations
      @ScienceCodeCreations 2 місяці тому +1

      @@user-wl4zu2ok1e Yeah, using the Change of Base formula, the answer becomes log(Φ).

  • @DanDart
    @DanDart 2 місяці тому

    I reckon it's going to have to do with phi... Curious one

    • @nathanmattor401
      @nathanmattor401 Місяць тому

      Yeah, I noticed that too.
      For me the interesting thing is that this result isn't confined to base 10.
      If you solved any problem "a^0 + a^x = a^2x" the answer would be log_a(\phi). Yet another magical property of phi I guess.

  • @nur-fueru-tube6174
    @nur-fueru-tube6174 Місяць тому

    So boring!