Win Fast at Chess with the Easiest Attacking Strategy
Вставка
- Опубліковано 24 гру 2024
- Have you ever wanted to sacrifice material and launch a devastating attack without spending lots of time calculating complicated variations? What if I told you there's a way to sacrifice in chess that’s so simple that it feels almost effortless? In the game we examine today, Samuel Reshevsky demonstrates how to use a positional sacrifice to launch a deadly attack-without complex calculations. By the end of this video, you’ll learn how to spot these opportunities and make attacking chess look really simple.
Evans vs Reshevsky, U.S. Championship 1970
1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 b6 4. Nc3 Bb7 5. a3 d5 6. Bg5 Be7 7. e3 O-O 8. Rc1 Ne4 9. Bxe7 Qxe7 10. cxd5 exd5 11. Nxe4 dxe4 12. Nd2 Rc8 13. Be2 Nd7 14. O-O c5 15. dxc5 Nxc5 16. Nb3 Rd8 17. Qc2 Nd3 18. Rcd1 Rac8 19. Qb1 Rd6 20. Nd4 Rxd4 21. exd4 Nf4 22. Rfe1 Qg5 23. g3 e3 24. f3 Nxe2+ 25. Rxe2 Bxf3 26. Rc1 Re8 27. Ree1 Bb7 28. Rc7 Qd5 29. Rxb7 Qxb7 30. Qd3 Qe4 31. Qxe4 Rxe4 32. Kg2 f5 33. Kf3 Kf7 34. Rxe3 Rxe3+ 35. Kxe3 g5 36. h4 h6 37. d5 Ke7 38. Kd4 Kd6 39. hxg5 hxg5 40. a4 a5 41. b3 g4 42. Ke3 Kxd5 43. Kd3 Kc5 44. Ke3 Kb4 45. Kf4 Kxb3 46. Kxf5 Kxa4 47. Kxg4 Kb4 0-1
Your videos are so instructive. Old gems, one after another :)
What a beautifully played endgame by Reshevsky- logical to the end.
nice clean game! I have a lot to learn still.. Thanks!
My pleasure!
Exactly, solid instructional video
1:49 after Bb4 white can counter by Bg5 pinning the Nf6
Love ❤ from INDIA ❤
Brillante final, gracias chess wisdom, saludos
My pleasure! Thanks for watching.
5:01 thought Nd7 would be the main idea, but first Rc8, that's what i would do so that there's no Rxc7 for white, after Nd7 i would play Nf6. Question, in the variation at 4:24 black can play Nd8(istead of going to the home square), or does it lose? well going to the home square is just losing a tempo & it's humanly hard to play that move, though engine disagrees with me probably...
Nd8 is also possible, but the engine prefers Nb8, as it allows Black to develop the knight to the ideal d7-square. On d8, the knight has limited prospects and is less active.
Please display the moves in algebraic notation like what you did in one of your videos such that I could copy it accurately and have my chess engine replay the games with all the variations, recommendations and analyses.
You can find it in the description section.
7:23 cant black play Nd3, sacrificing a pawn but activating the bishop, following up with the development of the rooks & Qg5 ideas of mate, so that the white bishop cannot opose the dark one on the long diagonal(namely white cannot play Bf3) since the white bishop would be hanging, due to the black queen pinning the g pawn? this is probably a bad play, but i dont know if the engine agrees or not with that sacrifice
After 16...Nd3, White manages to parry the checkmating threats and ends up with an extra pawn - 17. Rxc8 Rxc8 18. Bxd3 exd3 19. Qxd3 Qg5 and 20. g3, or 20. f3
6:39 isnt Rxc5 also good with the idea of doubling the rooks on the open file(i know the knight remains passive but there is, as you said the Nf6 idea)? Or does the engine hate that move(meaning if it loses to some tactic or not), & if white takes the rook, black recaptures with the knight, solving the problem of his passive knight
Rxc5 is also possible, but Nxc5 is stronger, as Black creates the immediate threat of Nd3, where the knight is much better placed than on f6.
Just learning here . Great game...but lots of calculations I wouldnt be able to make to be able to not have to calculate that sacrifice
21:50 isnt f3 still winning for black? making white waste a tempo so that black can get to the paws first?
After 43...f3 the white king manages to defend the b3-pawn - 44. Kxf3 Kxd5 45. Ke3 Kc5 46. Kd3 Kb4 47. Kc2
@@chesswisdom ah i see, couldn't calculate the whole line, i just had in my mind that by making white retreat his king, black gets the upper hand but it is a draw apparently, hopefully my comments didnt bother you as they were paragraphs😆Thanks for these great games, one of the few channels i have encountered that cover historical games, i have learnt a lot through your videos. Keep going sir! It's a pity that few people are ingaged in this type of content
@@DionAhm Thanks a lot for sharing your ideas and your kind words.
You can calculate it out, and you'll see it's not so simple.
All pawn endgames require ironclad calculation: it really makes a massive difference.
@@gaopinghu7332 already know that, the point here doesn't change, even if f3 it remains a draw
First