Fantastic Fight Against The London System. Marshall vs Rubinstein

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 3 лют 2024
  • The London System is a very popular opening for White. Lots of players opt for this opening, as it is a relatively simple system, and one does not need to memorize a lot of different variations. It is also a very solid system and if Black does not know how to play against it, he can get in trouble and lose very fast. In this game Akiba Rubinstein destroys the London System in a spectacular way, creating a strategic and tactical masterpiece.
    1. d4 d5 2. Bf4 Nf6 3. Nf3 e6 4. e3 c5 5. c3 Nc6 6. Bd3 Qb6 7. Qc1 Bd7 8. O-O Rc8 9. Nbd2 Be7 10. Rb1 O-O 11. Qd1 Rfd8 12. Ne5 Nxe5 13. dxe5 Ne8 14. Qh5 f5 15. Rfe1 Bb5 16. Bc2 Qa6 17. Ra1 Bd3 18. Bd1 Qb6 19. Nb3 a5 20. Bf3 Be4 21. Re2 Nc7 22. Rd2 a4 23. Nc1 g6 24. Qh3 Kh8 25. Qh6 Bxf3 26. gxf3 g5 27. Bg3 d4 28. exd4 f4 29. Ne2 fxg3 30. hxg3 Qc6 31. Qh5 Rf8 32. Kg2 Qe8 33. Qg4 Qg6 34. Rh1 c4 35. Qe4 Kg7 36. Qxb7 Nd5 37. g4 Rxf3 38. Qxc8 Qe4 39. Kg1 Ne3 40. Ng3 Rxg3+ 41. fxg3 Qb1+ 42. Kf2 Nxg4+ 43. Ke2 Qe4+ 0-1

КОМЕНТАРІ • 39

  • @wassimeid
    @wassimeid 4 місяці тому +7

    this has to be classified as artistic literature to be studied in school. wow what a game

    • @brianlara8651
      @brianlara8651 2 місяці тому

      Indeed. I've already placed it on watch later. Very very instructional game. Both sides finding great moves.

  • @matemaicon
    @matemaicon 4 місяці тому +5

    Best channel about games.

  • @Garou.5600
    @Garou.5600 4 місяці тому +3

    Great analysis from you master 👍🏻. Can you plz analyse Paul Morphy games . It's much more deep than we all think . He is an attacking genius but also his positional play is exquisite. One positional masterpiece is from his match against Daniel Harwitzz in 1858 where a Dutch game was played by Morphy with the black pieces. Can you plz analyse that game in your channel , it would be great to learn a lot with your analysis. Thank you ❤️

    • @chesswisdom
      @chesswisdom  3 місяці тому +2

      Thank you for your kind words and suggestion. Morphy was actually the first player who came to my mind when I just created the channel. But the problem is that most of his greatest games (including the one you mentioned) have already been analyzed on other channels. But I'll keep your suggestion in mind, and will make a video in case I come across some of his deep games that haven't been covered yet.

    • @Garou.5600
      @Garou.5600 3 місяці тому +1

      @@chesswisdom thank you so much master ❤️. Wish you great luck for the future

  • @davidhodgson1385
    @davidhodgson1385 2 місяці тому +1

    What a masterpiece ❤

  • @kingberzerk
    @kingberzerk 4 місяці тому +1

    Very instructive, thank you!

  • @Achbiter
    @Achbiter 3 місяці тому

    a very well put together lesson in strategy and the tactics that verified it. positional play might be a good tag

  • @willyh.r.1216
    @willyh.r.1216 4 місяці тому

    Great teaching, thank you.

  • @dr.deepakgore1079
    @dr.deepakgore1079 4 місяці тому +1

    Awesome game by Ruby, great to learn from them ,best analytical commentary, thanks 🎉🎉🎉❤❤❤

  • @s-so6iz
    @s-so6iz 3 місяці тому

    Superb! Thank you very much!

  • @flippert0
    @flippert0 3 місяці тому +1

    Rubinstein was one those "greatest player never to become world champion" players. In terms of positional understanding he sure rivaled Capablanca. From 1908 to 1918 he was clearly always atleast top 5 (if not top 2, behind Capa). From 1912 to 1914 there were negotiations for a Lasker-Rubinstein match but of course WW1 came in the way. After that war, Rubinstein played noticeably weaker and more erratically.

  • @zmike79
    @zmike79 3 місяці тому

    I have just found this channel......great explanation. Thank you

  • @uthoshantm
    @uthoshantm 3 місяці тому +1

    Great commentary

  • @alessandrorigobello7551
    @alessandrorigobello7551 3 місяці тому

    really really perfectly and deeply commented! Congratulations!

  • @nikolalikic5280
    @nikolalikic5280 4 місяці тому

    Fantastic game, playing with the idea of a rook sacrifice was that much joyful after it was played in the game, thank you for your videos!

  • @amosdraak3536
    @amosdraak3536 3 місяці тому

    A fine tournament with three players, Rubinstein (who took first), Marshall (2nd), and the fellow Polish master, Salwe. It had some interesting games, such as Rubinstein overlooking a mate in one and getting mated by Marshall, and losing on time to Salwe a winning position with a great passed pawn.
    As to this game, while Marshall was indeed a fine and ingenious player, he tended to play these risky positions where he in the short term appears to have some decent compensation, but positionally might be suffering one or more flaws. It’s perhaps a main reason he lost his title match so decisively the year prior to Lasker- an “over” (if I may) eager desire for an attack at the expense of developmental and/ or his king safety. It was fine calculation by Rubinstein, especially at the end where he coordinated his mating attack in similar fashion to Steinitz’ immortal combination.
    Excellent work as always, Sir.

    • @chesswisdom
      @chesswisdom  3 місяці тому +1

      Thank you, Sir. A very interesting review as always.

    • @amosdraak3536
      @amosdraak3536 3 місяці тому

      @@chesswisdom
      My pleasure always, Sir.

  • @aungkhin6903
    @aungkhin6903 3 місяці тому

    Beautiful explanation without moving the pieces!

    • @lukemarks3281
      @lukemarks3281 3 місяці тому

      I coulda used a few more pieces moved honestly. Great video as always, but dude Going straight Hikaru with the arrows

  • @monsoon4786
    @monsoon4786 Місяць тому

    Keep it up bro❤

  • @christianhitschfeld8295
    @christianhitschfeld8295 3 місяці тому

    In the pause moment isnt QF5 a better solution? If Qxb7 then the same idea, Nd5, the differece being that the king is not pinned by the queen and you put pressure on the f5 pawn. Then one has to calculate f4, but if white pawn ever takes g5 then great pressure on the f2 square

    • @chesswisdom
      @chesswisdom  3 місяці тому

      After Qf5, White can play g4 attacking the queen, after which if Black exchanges the queens, the white pawn will appear on e4 square, and White will take under control the d5 square and get some counter play in the center. And if Black doesn't exchange the queens after g4 and retreats to f7, White can play Rdd1 and double his rooks on the h file creating some unpleasant threats.

  • @fightingforcatalonia
    @fightingforcatalonia 4 місяці тому

    i am a big fan and supporter. I wonder what your elo is? i'd say 2100 minimum,right?

    • @chesswisdom
      @chesswisdom  4 місяці тому +2

      Thank you. I haven't participated in FIDE rated tournaments, I'm just a chess enthusiast.

    • @fightingforcatalonia
      @fightingforcatalonia 4 місяці тому

      @@chesswisdom you are the alpha ultimate boss. Honestly, keep up! The sky is the limit

    • @chesswisdom
      @chesswisdom  4 місяці тому

      Thank you :)

  • @WHAT-gm1xm
    @WHAT-gm1xm 4 місяці тому

    Make a video on Emory Tate games

  • @jrousselle7828
    @jrousselle7828 День тому

    I find it VERY annoying when the Black pieces are displayed on the bottom.

  • @kalolewalow
    @kalolewalow 13 днів тому

    Intuition:
    1.Kg7 xxx
    2.Ng5?
    Edit: Omfg I got it. I meant Nd5*. I’m so happy.