****FREE LWC COURSE VOUCHER***** Are you someone or do you know someone who recently appeared for a Salesforce Developer interview at Google/Amazon/Uber/Salesforce or any major product company? Then reach out to me at *sfdcfacts@**gmail.com* to share your interview experience and get access to LWC udemy course for FREE!!!!!
Very interesting questions. It was a very engaging video thanks. BTW just for info 20% decrement in 100 is 80. But 20% increment in 80 is not 100, its 96.
Discount workflow with re - evaluation, Amount =100 so, WF1 will be triggered and final amount would be 80K, Then WF2 will be triggered and final amount would be 100k, then again WF1 will be triggered and then final amount would be 80k, After that WF2 would not be triggered because it has no re-evaluation. So answer would be 80K Same for the last test case. Amount would be 100k Correct me if I am wrong.
That's very creative manish.. This kind of content we expect from other Salesforce channels as well.... I hope others will follow your path and create awareness about interview process and questions.. Keep uploading more videos.. 👍👍
When did you create your last Salesforce Flow? What was the requirement and why did you choose Flow? This is how I would have addressed the question: I was given a requirement recently where they want certain related records to be deleted when a field on the parent record meet certain criteria. I started by looking at the declarative tools available to me. 1. Workflow rules (WF): I couldn't use WF because it’s incapable of deleting a record. 2. Process builder can't also be used for this requirement. Although, it’s capable of performing more automation than WF, it’s also incapable of deleting records. Flows was my last and chosen option. I choose Flows because an autolaunched flow - “Record-Triggered Flow” can be used to delete a record when a record is created or updated using the delete records element. Although a trigger could be created for this use case it’s a best practice to always adopt the simplest solution before code is considered.
It will really support with an interview in the future... I do watch every video from this channel... Thank you for your valuable knowledge&Time. Be Safe Take care :)
Ur teaching is amazing 👌 . Plz do video on atleast 50 advanced formula fields with combination of if, ispicval, and , or...ect plz cover some important functions.
Manish, thank you for this mind teaser scenario. I actually tried above scenario in my dev org and following are the findings: WFR1: Acc WF Amount Grt or Equal 100 WFR2: Acc WF Tax on Amount Test 1: both actions are NO re-evaluate Input: Amount is 50 Output: Total Amount is 70 //WFR2 applied because Amount is less than 100
Test 2: both actions are NO re-evaluate Input: Amount is 100 Output: Total Amount is 80 //WFR1 applies because Amount is equal to 100, so 20% discount Test 3: WFR1 Action :: re-evaluate and WFR2 Action :: NO re-evaluate Input: Amount is 100 Output: Total Amount is 100 //WFR1 Action: value=80, WFR2 Action: value=100
Test 4: WFR1 Action :: re-evaluate and WFR2 Action :: re-evaluate [Both actions re-evaluate] Input: Amount is 100 Output: Total Amount is 100 //WFR1 Action: value=80, WFR2 Action: value=100
Test 5: WFR1 Action :: NO re-evaluate and WFR2 Action :: re-evaluate Input: Amount is 100 Output: Total Amount is 80 //only WFR1 Action: value=80 is applied From above tests, Test#3 and Test#5, if first WFR action is not set to re-evaluate then further other WFR actions will not be performed. Also as mentioned in video, I did not observed any error in debug logs when both the actions are re-evaluate. Please correct me if I am wrong.
Case 2 output seems incorrect. When WF1 applies , it becomes 80 but rule will also be applied since it is less than 100(both no reevaluation , hence stops on 100). So output should be 100 (80+20). In Case 4, should not it be a recursive one. (100->80->100->80->100 and goes on). It should hit hour workflow limit and should throw an error.
Hi Manish, Thanks for this awesome content! Could you please also share the right answers for the questions you have asked. I would anyway be working on it, but it will be nice to clear up the doubt and have the right understanding.
Manish, Thank you very much for your videos. I am practicing for developer interview. Could you tell me where I can get practice questions? Could you provide me practice questions for developer and admin? Thank you. 🙂
Hii, In the third scenario of the trigger it should be 80k and not 100k right? In fourth scenario it should be 20% taxes means it will become 96k but not 100k right? How many of you think this is correct?
You have a requirement to create a task when the amount field value on an account is greater than 100k and associate the task with the account. Which tool will you use for the requirement and why? As with many automation on the salesforce platform, always start with the easiest solution by giving priority to declarative development over code. For this use case in particular, although a workflow rule can meet the requirement. From a scalability standpoint, the best option is to go with a process using process builder. This approach future proofs your solution if there’s ever a need to extend the configuration beyond simply creating a task. E.g. You might later need to do some automation on a child object relating to account and more.
****FREE LWC COURSE VOUCHER*****
Are you someone or do you know someone who recently appeared for a Salesforce Developer interview at Google/Amazon/Uber/Salesforce or any major product company?
Then reach out to me at *sfdcfacts@**gmail.com* to share your interview experience and get access to LWC udemy course for FREE!!!!!
Very interesting questions. It was a very engaging video thanks.
BTW just for info 20% decrement in 100 is 80. But 20% increment in 80 is not 100, its 96.
If you look carefully it was not 20% increment but 20k increment which results in 100k. Hope it's clear now
Discount workflow with re - evaluation,
Amount =100 so,
WF1 will be triggered and final amount would be 80K,
Then WF2 will be triggered and final amount would be 100k,
then again WF1 will be triggered and then final amount would be 80k,
After that WF2 would not be triggered because it has no re-evaluation.
So answer would be 80K
Same for the last test case. Amount would be 100k
Correct me if I am wrong.
That's very creative manish..
This kind of content we expect from other Salesforce channels as well.... I hope others will follow your path and create awareness about interview process and questions.. Keep uploading more videos.. 👍👍
Thanks Ashish. I am glad you find my content useful.
Lmao wow. I'm speechless on your effort to disable closed captioning on all of your videos. Well done
When did you create your last Salesforce Flow? What was the requirement and why did you choose Flow?
This is how I would have addressed the question:
I was given a requirement recently where they want certain related records to be deleted when a field on the parent record meet certain criteria. I started by looking at the declarative tools available to me.
1. Workflow rules (WF): I couldn't use WF because it’s incapable of deleting a record.
2. Process builder can't also be used for this requirement. Although, it’s capable of performing more automation than WF, it’s also incapable of deleting records.
Flows was my last and chosen option. I choose Flows because an autolaunched flow - “Record-Triggered Flow” can be used to delete a record when a record is created or updated using the delete records element. Although a trigger could be created for this use case it’s a best practice to always adopt the simplest solution before code is considered.
Manish you are much more knowledgeable than a MVP
Thanks
Welldone Manish👍🏻
Very valuable and informative content Manish and Narendra.thank you very much🙂
very Helpful Video manish
It will really support with an interview in the future... I do watch every video from this channel... Thank you for your valuable knowledge&Time. Be Safe Take care :)
Workflow question - Domino effect if both are marked for reevaluation.
Ur teaching is amazing 👌 . Plz do video on atleast 50 advanced formula fields with combination of if, ispicval, and , or...ect plz cover some important functions.
very good manish bro , thanks for wonderful session.
Very valuable. Please make more videos like this 🙂
Really great content... Looking forward for more such videos.. 👍😊
Nice Content deserves more Subscribers
Manish, thank you for this mind teaser scenario. I actually tried above scenario in my dev org and following are the findings:
WFR1: Acc WF Amount Grt or Equal 100
WFR2: Acc WF Tax on Amount
Test 1: both actions are NO re-evaluate
Input: Amount is 50
Output: Total Amount is 70 //WFR2 applied because Amount is less than 100
Test 2: both actions are NO re-evaluate
Input: Amount is 100
Output: Total Amount is 80 //WFR1 applies because Amount is equal to 100, so 20% discount
Test 3: WFR1 Action :: re-evaluate and WFR2 Action :: NO re-evaluate
Input: Amount is 100
Output: Total Amount is 100 //WFR1 Action: value=80, WFR2 Action: value=100
Test 4: WFR1 Action :: re-evaluate and WFR2 Action :: re-evaluate [Both actions re-evaluate]
Input: Amount is 100
Output: Total Amount is 100 //WFR1 Action: value=80, WFR2 Action: value=100
Test 5: WFR1 Action :: NO re-evaluate and WFR2 Action :: re-evaluate
Input: Amount is 100
Output: Total Amount is 80 //only WFR1 Action: value=80 is applied
From above tests, Test#3 and Test#5, if first WFR action is not set to re-evaluate then further other WFR actions will not be performed.
Also as mentioned in video, I did not observed any error in debug logs when both the actions are re-evaluate.
Please correct me if I am wrong.
Case 2 output seems incorrect. When WF1 applies , it becomes 80 but rule will also be applied since it is less than 100(both no reevaluation , hence stops on 100). So output should be 100 (80+20).
In Case 4, should not it be a recursive one. (100->80->100->80->100 and goes on).
It should hit hour workflow limit and should throw an error.
Are amount and total amount field are same or different?
I could able to replicate same result, I used Amount and Total Amount are same fields
Time20:25 aprx - why tax will add ? It says tax will add if amount
Yes. You are right. I guess they forgot the equal to sign.
Thanks to both of you, awesome !
Thanks . Will Request Do interview with Annoynoums People
And It should be sams like Resume Screening and Feedback
Great Work ! True Ohana
Hi Amit, If you want me to take random interviews, please send those people’s resume to sfdcfacts@gmail.com. I would love to screen through them.
@@SFDCFacts Sure
Its really super helpful for anyone, thanks for coming up with useful content.
interview session is good to know the real-time environment techniques. Thankful for this session
Informative video, can you provide more scenarios based questions..
2nd Q, will the purchase record not be deleted as the product record got deleted?
Thanks a lot sir. I am your biggest fan ! Please make video on development project along with handson .. please....
guys- awesome !
Great content ♥️
This video has been very helpful, please do a detailed tutorial on SOQL Query Optimization, thanks
Pls do more mock interviews
It is awesome content. Please also share the answers for scenario based question.
Thanks for real time scenarios
Hi @sfdcfacts acadmey Can you please explain the scenario with Discount with re evaluation. What will be the correct answer?
Hi Manish,
Thanks for this awesome content!
Could you please also share the right answers for the questions you have asked.
I would anyway be working on it, but it will be nice to clear up the doubt and have the right understanding.
Manish can you provide correct answer in case of both workflow have re-evaluation setup triggers.
Manish, Thank you very much for your videos. I am practicing for developer interview. Could you tell me where I can get practice questions?
Could you provide me practice questions for developer and admin? Thank you. 🙂
For the part 2 video. It's saying that it's a private video 😕
Same issue for me too..
Do you still don’t see it?
Now I can watch part 2. Thanks a lot.🙂🙂
Please bring more mock interviews like these
Hii, In the third scenario of the trigger it should be 80k and not 100k right?
In fourth scenario it should be 20% taxes means it will become 96k but not 100k right?
How many of you think this is correct?
Is Salesforce a good thing to learn as a fresher, please answer this question
No
Ofcourse. There are so many companies hiring freshers in Salesforce domain.
Very Helpful .. Subsd and Liked Already .. How can we follow Narender Singh on youtube too ... !
Thank you so much🙏
helpful😊
Thanks a lot for this.
I want Salesforce training
You are at the right place
You have a requirement to create a task when the amount field value on an account is greater than 100k and associate the task with the account. Which tool will you use for the requirement and why?
As with many automation on the salesforce platform, always start with the easiest solution by giving priority to declarative development over code. For this use case in particular, although a workflow rule can meet the requirement. From a scalability standpoint, the best option is to go with a process using process builder. This approach future proofs your solution if there’s ever a need to extend the configuration beyond simply creating a task. E.g. You might later need to do some automation on a child object relating to account and more.
for 3rd scenario in last question how its 100k , it should be 80k. kindly give a brief
Hey manish is there a private chat we can have a discussion on
I have taken your courses on udemy and would like chat little bit on it