Yes. The whole phenomonological schtick is indeed quite more easily underschoiod than try to explain any of it. Me learn to just be there (dare I say it: dasein.)?
@@nunanunu297 what are you stuck on? I found my masters the most enjoyable ever :) I documented it all on my channel but I’m Uploading three years behind :)
This is the best study method i know! Your blackboard and excitement is unforgetable. If someone ask me on word phenomenal, i wil tell him about my cat( i have a dog, for real) ✌️👏👏
I really enjoyed your presentation of this topic! It was easy to follow and more importantly the information is easily generalized to a variety of circumstances. I have not previously learned about the different methods of phenomenological interpretation, I find these distinctions useful but am curious if certain situations would benefit from a specific kind of interpretation. For example, I am writing about using a phenomenological study to evaluate foreign student integration into U.S based classrooms. Do you think that kind of study would benefit from an interpretation of a kind of experience more so than an analysis of the form of an experience? These are fairly abstract concepts and I’m curious if some situations are better suited for one of the three distinctions made in this video.
Hello, the background ppt slides of your video seem to resemble the content of another video that I showcased to my students in 2019 and that seems to now be deleted. The video offered a wonderful brief review of how to conduct phenomenological analysis (transcendental). Was it your video? And if so, do you have another link for that video? Thank you in advance for your help.
i like the video and information, but I often find the "easy examples" as "cats and such" in videos and textbooks more confusing than helpfull. very often the research questions are a little more intrecate than the expamples. I know the examples are ment to be easy, but idk why i rather prefer a more in depth example thats more relatable : D
This is hard work and it is not made any easier by the fact that Dr Moerman does not know how to pronounce the name of the phenimenon he is describing.
How do you pronunciate phenomenon, and which source do you use as a foundation, and if you can understand he is saying phenomenon then doesn't that undermine your proposition?
I like this tutor, very charismatic and sincere. God bless your soul for raising great students
I love your spontaneous jumping! Very interesting and easy to understand. Thank you :)
Me too!
He seems so passionate.
Yes. The whole phenomonological schtick is indeed quite more easily underschoiod than try to explain any of it. Me learn to just be there (dare I say it: dasein.)?
Phenomenal explanation !
super energetic and expressive performance. great work!
This is so super helpful! I'm just starting my Phd and this is soooo good. Thank you so very much!
How did you survive your Master coz I'm stuck
@@nunanunu297 what are you stuck on? I found my masters the most enjoyable ever :) I documented it all on my channel but
I’m
Uploading three years behind :)
Hello @LouiseUsher! I am starting my PhD, did you use the phenomenological method as well? Did you publish your work already? Thank you!
@@markjohnpalanca6087 no I haven’t published. I’m still working on it.
This is the best study method i know! Your blackboard and excitement is unforgetable. If someone ask me on word phenomenal, i wil tell him about my cat( i have a dog, for real) ✌️👏👏
love the excitement !
Thanks for the video . Concepts are clear now . And also thanks for the excitement ❤️
Loved your enthusiasm!!!!
Loving this video, very well explained. Thanks!
Real nice way of your presentation Sir!
The two seconds of ecstatic silence before he begins to speak contain enough energy to power a city
I really enjoyed your presentation of this topic! It was easy to follow and more importantly the information is easily generalized to a variety of circumstances. I have not previously learned about the different methods of phenomenological interpretation, I find these distinctions useful but am curious if certain situations would benefit from a specific kind of interpretation. For example, I am writing about using a phenomenological study to evaluate foreign student integration into U.S based classrooms. Do you think that kind of study would benefit from an interpretation of a kind of experience more so than an analysis of the form of an experience? These are fairly abstract concepts and I’m curious if some situations are better suited for one of the three distinctions made in this video.
Hi, do you have any coming training? I need to improve my skills at this methodology.
This is amazing!
Hello, could you please add references to the description?
It would be nice to see a example
Dude! Great explanation, but you're all up in my *space* Calm down!
thanks for this video! it was too clear)))
Can I use phenomenological research to explore perceptions?
is this the janitor from suite life of zack and cody teaching about phenomenology
Hello, the background ppt slides of your video seem to resemble the content of another video that I showcased to my students in 2019 and that seems to now be deleted. The video offered a wonderful brief review of how to conduct phenomenological analysis (transcendental). Was it your video? And if so, do you have another link for that video? Thank you in advance for your help.
very clear video, thanks !
i like the video and information, but I often find the "easy examples" as "cats and such" in videos and textbooks more confusing than helpfull. very often the research questions are a little more intrecate than the expamples. I know the examples are ment to be easy, but idk why i rather prefer a more in depth example thats more relatable : D
YEARS in the library!?! OK! I'll gladly give up my life of an American expat posha just to graso the freedom from Cartesian mindcuffs!
Watch curb your enthusiasm about Lewis's dead parakeet to see a terrible interaction 🤣
I suspect this guys is high. Though the content is interesting.
Stupid assumption.
university of amsterdam
@@teodordl That explains a lot )
This is hard work and it is not made any easier by the fact that Dr Moerman does not know how to pronounce the name of the phenimenon he is describing.
How do you pronunciate phenomenon, and which source do you use as a foundation, and if you can understand he is saying phenomenon then doesn't that undermine your proposition?
Please stop jumping.
Armchair philosophy 😅
Some people will claim that these Neural networks have racial biasm attached to their pseudoscientific EXO philosophical muses