Yamaha RX-797 + Diamond 9.6 Stereo System
Вставка
- Опубліковано 22 вер 2024
- Here is a run down of my stereo system -
Yamaha RX-797 Stereo Receiver 100w/ch
Onkyo TX-8255 Stereo Receiver 50w/ch
12" DIY speakers (35hz)
Wharfedale Diamond 9.6 (2x 8", 28hz) speakers
Harman Kardon DVD48 Universal Player(my CD Player)
Harman Kardon BDP1 Universal Player (my DVD/BluRay Player)
Pioneer PL-35A Turntable w/ Stanton 680EE Cartridge
Vizio 42" LED TV
Retail value ~ US$4,275
I Paid ~ US$2,520 including the TV
Camera = Canon SX-30 IS which I'm only moderately satisfied with
Wow, thanks for that very informative and highly constructive comment.
Wow, dzięki za komentarz bardzo pouczające i bardzo konstruktywne.
The Yamaha RX-797 is excellent for the money.
I have no doubt there are better amps, but they are also substantially more money. In a general consumer Receiver, the Yamaha are excellent value.
I'm very happy with it, but the 'Loudness' control is pretty much useless, I would rather have the old fashioned Loudness Button. Still, you aren't forced to use the Loudness control, so in the end, everything is fine.
Again, for the money, an excellent amp.
Actually, if you click on my name (BlueBoyBlue) just below the video on the left. That will take you to a couple of videos where I demonstrate the equipment. The Santana video sounds especially nice.
brilliant! Whats your opinion about Yamaha RX-797?
Neither do I speak Chinese, but I am very impressed that you do. Polish and Chinese .... who knew?
Ja też nie mówi po chińsku, ale jestem pod wrażeniem, że to zrobisz. Polskim i chińskim .... kto wie?
Be aware that I have other videos demonstrating my equipment. This was just an introduction so people could see my system. I demonstrate both CD and Turntable.
Należy pamiętać, że mam inne filmy pokazujące mój sprzęt. To był tylko wstęp, więc ludzie mogli zobaczyć mój system. I pokazują, CD i gramofonu.
动 名 = Activity Name?
Care to explain?
which one do you choose for listen to music Diamond 9.6 or Q Acoustic 3050 ?
what is the differences between them ?
Well, obviously I chose the Diamond 9.6. The Diamond 9.6 have larger bass drivers and deeper bass, but they are also more expensive. The DIamond 9.6 are long out of productions, you can still get the equivalent in the Diamond 250 or the Diamond 11.5 but plan on paying considerably more than I did, and considerably more than the standard retail cost.
*Diamond 250 - 2x8" - US$1300/pair -*
www.musicdirect.com/customer-favorites-our-best-selling-gear/wharfedale-diamond-250-tower-speakers
*Diamond 11.5 - 2x8" - US$1700/pr -*
www.musicdirect.com/speakers/Wharfedale-Diamond-115-Tower-Speakers
*Q Acoustic 3050/3050i - 2x6.5" - US$700pr to US$800/pr -*
www.amazon.com/Acoustics-Floorstanding-Speaker-American-Walnut/dp/B00TSET4RE/
www.amazon.com/Acoustics-3050i-Floorstanding-Speaker-Graphite/dp/B07D7G2SGB/
That's a considerably difference in cost. But in the $700 to $800 range, the Q Acoustic 3050/3050i hold up very well.
Here are other speakers in a similar price range. All good but each in their own way -
www.crutchfield.com/p_107RTIA7C/Polk-Audio-RTi-A7-Cherry.html
www.crutchfield.com/p_714RP280FC/Klipsch-Reference-Premiere-RP-280F-Cherry.html
www.crutchfield.com/p_336D230WN/Wharfedale-Diamond-230-Walnut-Pearl.html
www.crutchfield.com/p_714RP5000W/Klipsch-Reference-Premiere-RP-5000F-Walnut.html
www.crutchfield.com/p_970DF62/ELAC-Debut-2-0-F6-2.html
www.crutchfield.com/p_893SLVR6W/Monitor-Audio-Silver-6-Walnut.html
www.crutchfield.com/p_893BZ6B/Monitor-Audio-Bronze-6-Black-Oak-Vinyl.html
If you are looking for an absolute bargain in a speaker, here are the _Wharfedale Diamond 10.6 (2x6.5")_ which have a suggested retail of about $1300/pr, now on sale for $699/pr. _(Black, Walnut, Rosewood)_
www.musicdirect.com/biggest-holiday-specials/wharfedale-diamond-107-tower-speakers-pr
@@blueboyblue ıs there much difference sound clearance and soundstage between Diamond 9.6 and Q Acoustic 3050 ?
Poważnie? nawijałeś przez ponad 5 minut, nawet tego nie odpaliłeś. Chłopie zacznij słuchać tego sprzętu, starczy tych folderów.
For those not conversant -
"a tam pierdolisz a puścił byś to a nie takie sranie po krzakach"
According to Google Translate is -
"and there and let you fuck it and not the shitting in the bushes"
Not everyone in the world speaks English, and I don't speak Polish, so if I have misinterpreted ... sorry. Otherwise, a very sad and pointless comment. Still thanks for the views.
动 名
Poważnie? nawijałeś przez ponad 5 minut, nawet tego nie odpaliłeś. Chłopie zacznij słuchać tego sprzętu, starczy tych folderów.
+tobik719 - - "Seriously? nawijałeś for more than 5 minutes, he did not even fired. Dude start listening to this equipment, enough of these folders."
Which means - - "Seriously? nawijałeś for more than 5 minutes, he did not even fired. Dude start listening to this equipment, enough of these folders."
In Polish. Not sure how to take that, but you said -"listen to the equipment" - that is good enough for me. This isn't the greatest equipment in the world, and it has taken me a long time to accumulate what I have, but for the very modest money I paid, I'm very happy with it. Especially for music.
Sprzęt jest kozak, tylko za dużo gadasz. cena nie zawsze znaczy jakość, co z jakości jeśli miało by to być tylko na pokaz. rozumiem że korzystasz z tłumacza.
jest jak jest, is like is :)) i bez tłumacza
pozdrawiam
+tobik719 - - My system is very modestly priced Consumer grade equipment. Though I paid MUCH less than the retail price for everything. It paid about 50% of the listed price. I sounds very good for the amount of money I paid.
Mój system jest bardzo skromnie cenie sprzętu klasy konsumentów. Choć zapłaciłem znacznie mniej niż ceny detalicznej za wszystko. Zapłaciłem około 50% ceny wymienionych. I brzmi bardzo dobrze w wysokości ceny zapłaconej.
So m'i, but now i looking for something better. Used systems it's not the same what is new, less price, more quality for less money your system looks good. sounds too.
Ja również skompletowałem swój system za symboliczną kwotę, jest on jednak znacznie słabszy od prezentowanego w nagraniu. Obecnie poszukuję coś bardziej zaawansowanego nie pochodzącego z chin