They turned chemistry into a puzzle game...

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 29 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 773

  • @calebhuizenga6127
    @calebhuizenga6127 10 місяців тому +1217

    >>"What is just four oxygens stuck together?"
    As a chemist, the answer is 'a very very angry molecule'

    • @alext8828
      @alext8828 10 місяців тому +97

      O3 being ozone, what's the 4th O doing?

    • @CaTastrophy427
      @CaTastrophy427 10 місяців тому

      surely not as angry as 14 Nitrogens stuck together with only a couple of Carbons to _"stabilize"_ it

    • @calebhuizenga6127
      @calebhuizenga6127 10 місяців тому +220

      @@alext8828 Probably finding any excuse it can to leave. My guess is if for some chance this did happen to exist it would immediately fall apart and make two O2 molecules

    • @MidlandMark
      @MidlandMark 10 місяців тому +125

      O-O-O-O.....
      Isn't that the Orgasm molecule?

    • @janzwendelaar907
      @janzwendelaar907 10 місяців тому +62

      ​@@MidlandMarkit's going to squirt all over the place alright

  • @thatjeff7550
    @thatjeff7550 10 місяців тому +872

    "If helium is so rare, why are we filling party balloons with it?"
    And that, RCE, is an actual, honest to god issue. Helium reserves were nationalized decades ago but our (US) companies forced the feds to open up the reserves for their own interest and subsidize the cost of helium prices, otherwise the cost of helium would be astronomical. Also because of that, we're slowly running out of helium that is needed for vital uses.

    • @blankityblankblank2321
      @blankityblankblank2321 10 місяців тому +43

      well it mainly comes downto helium actually being rare in the first place. It is only really found in underground pockets next to radioactive sources.

    • @Landrassa1
      @Landrassa1 10 місяців тому +109

      Look, just because you need an MRI doesn't mean i should have to forego my squeaky voice.

    • @anonymoususer188
      @anonymoususer188 10 місяців тому +98

      Ah yes. Capitalism at its finest. Wasting a rare and value resource on frivolous things just to make a quick buck. Why do I suddenly hear the song "How Bad Can I Be" playing in my head?

    • @castlegamer-bo3bw
      @castlegamer-bo3bw 10 місяців тому

      you tell rce thatjeff7550

    • @mishXY
      @mishXY 10 місяців тому +30

      Helium is not rare outside of earth. The issue is that there is no way (yet) to create helium, it’s produced as a byproduct of radioactive breakdown. The thing is that every Helium molecule wants to go to space - it’s always it’s final destination. We are just trying to make that path longer

  • @zecuse
    @zecuse 10 місяців тому +418

    13:30 A degree in chemistry gets you to the point where you start turning cotton balls into cotton candy, your own urine into artificial sweetener, toilet paper into moonshine, vinyl gloves into hot sauce, paint thinner into cherry soda, and calling that a meal!

    • @tiffanymarie9750
      @tiffanymarie9750 10 місяців тому +147

      I see we watch the same psychotic chemist.

    • @uribove
      @uribove 10 місяців тому +88

      The NileRed slander 🤣🤣🤣

    • @anarchosnowflakist786
      @anarchosnowflakist786 10 місяців тому +80

      and styrofoam into cinnamon now

    • @baseballjustin5
      @baseballjustin5 10 місяців тому

      ​​Styrofoam into SPICY **ILLEGAL** Cinnamon​, if combined with other chemicals @anarchosnowflakist786

    • @tiffanymarie9750
      @tiffanymarie9750 10 місяців тому +30

      @@uribove is it slander if it's true? 🤔 I mean let's be real, the worst smell experiment really proves the point.

  • @jacksonstarky8288
    @jacksonstarky8288 10 місяців тому +217

    Two atoms are talking about their recent experiences.
    Atom 1: "I think I've lost an electron!"
    Atom 2: "Are you sure?"
    Atom 1: "I'm positive!"

    • @brooosky
      @brooosky 10 місяців тому +5

      ha ha how funny, you get it, cuz an electron is negative hahahahahahahhahahahahahajahahahahajhahahahahhahahahahaha

    • @SparerRoom49700
      @SparerRoom49700 10 місяців тому +3

      Atom 3: "I think someone has lost an electron because I'm negative."

    • @Piglin_Emperor
      @Piglin_Emperor 7 місяців тому +2

      Atom 4: Shouldn't You Be Happy? I mean, You Cl atoms always Want to get One more. By the way, Anyone wants 2 Of my Electrons? They Just Make Me Unstable Being there.

    • @Rikard_Nilsson
      @Rikard_Nilsson 6 місяців тому +1

      Two guys walks into a bar, the bartender asks "what can I get ya?"
      the first guy goes "I'll take a glass of H20"
      the other guy goes "I'll take a glass of H20 too".
      The second guy died.

  • @Nonsense331
    @Nonsense331 10 місяців тому +475

    I think it would be more fun if it told you the name of the molecule you just made, and the fun fact was about that molecule.

    • @o_s-24
      @o_s-24 10 місяців тому +17

      Yeah exactly!

    • @diametheuslambda
      @diametheuslambda 10 місяців тому +17

      One of the common molecules you make is formaldehyde. Formaldehyde fun!

    • @ryanjohnson3615
      @ryanjohnson3615 10 місяців тому +28

      No doubt. I thought the premise of the game could be really neat but it doesn't seem to have very much actual science.

    • @Maddog3060
      @Maddog3060 10 місяців тому +1

      This.

    • @Adowrath
      @Adowrath 9 місяців тому +2

      The first game did that, it's very confusing to see they no longer do that here.

  • @radimnechut519
    @radimnechut519 10 місяців тому +42

    Some notes for those interested about Matt's questions
    1:20 Bonds sort of like that exist, but you probably mean the 1.5 (actually 1.33) _bond order_ in CO3(2-) or molecules like that.
    1:35 Some elements are rare on Earth, some in the universe, and some in both. Some elements are also not in large amount on the surface of Earth, but may be in larger amounts on asteroids or under a planet's surface. Some elements occur naturally in rocks and minerals that are hard to refine into the element. Some elements are the combination of several or all of the above. That makes them hard to obtain, expensive to mine, extract, and use, and so they are "endangered" in that they are hard mine, extract, and their ores are in limited amounts on Earth.
    3:45 Helium is not made by a lot of natural or artificial processes on Earth. It is mostly made by nuclear reactions (fissions and fusions), only some of which can happen on Earth, so much of Earth's helium still comes from the sun and universe around us. As it is a very light and small (almost as much as hydrogen) element and chemically practically inactive (it comes from the group noble/inert gases on the right of the periodic table), so it can be used in a lot of ways, but it also easily slips through all of atmosphere (and all sorts of other materials, even solid) to the edge and then out of it. It is also quite easy to find still, and to make in some smaller quantities. But you are right, it still does not make much sense. Similar to indium and other elements and chemicals. But humans often don't make too much sense.
    4:14 Formaldehyde (systematically methanal). Similar to methane (hence the systematic name), but 2 hydrogens are replaced with 1 double bond to 1 oxygen.
    6:50 Water is technically systematically named dihydrogen monoxide (but even in systematic nomenclature the mono- prefix is often omitted). This molecule is called peroxide and not dioxide, because the prefixes express the number and types of bonds present. A per-oxide has a O-O bond, a di-oxide is just oxide twice, and oxides have always 2 O-X bonds (X being any other element, but O). It helps chemists to imagine the molecule, even if there are no alternative bonding structures really possible/probable.
    7:35 Some of the most efficient molecules to bond with many metals are found in biochemistry, so often even in our bodies. That is also part of the reason, why are so many metals toxic (like cadmium, lead, or mercury). They change some molecules they bond to well, which then harm us, or they displace those metals we need (like iron or calcium) from molecules, that bond to those beneficial metals.
    8:00 Close. That would need one more oxygen atom. This is nitrous acid. A less stable and more dangerous acid of nitrogen.
    8:50 Hydrazine is similar to and derived from ammonia. Its use in rocket fuels is partly because of the stability of N2 molecules and the reactivity of N-H bonds.
    11:40 Iron(III) oxide gets easily hydrated by water, even just the moisture in the air. It makes iron(III) hydroxide, which is also reddish brown and quite similar in many ways to the oxide. In fact, iron(III) compound are often red, brown, or orange-yellow.
    12:05 The plus probably means it's a hydrogen atom without one electron, thus a cation H+. As a matter of fact, hydrogen has only one proton and one electron, so a hydrogen cation is often (except for the isotopes of hydrogen, deuterium and tritium, which have a proton and some neutrons) just a lone proton.
    12:20 As with the 1.33 bond order in CO3(2-), electrons can be shared in a bond between 2 atoms in all sorts of weird ways. Technically, one such bond could between a hydrogen atom and a hydrogen cation, a bond consisting of one electron of the bond order 0.5.
    13:30 Ions, and ionic bonds specifically, seem relatively easy on the elementary or high school level, but is in fact quite more complex to the extent, that some aspects of them are still not fully understood and are still a bit debated today.
    14:55 Cat-ions, an-ions. You say it like it's built - _ion_ plus the prefix cat- or an-, which you say like you say _cat_ or _an_
    17:20 A very odd (ironically) molecule that. Very unstable too. You would call this specifically a cycle - a cyclic chain molecule of oxygen. The previous attempt would be called a linear chain molecule (or just a linear molecule/chain v cycle/cyclic molecule). As oxygen tends to react and combine with most atoms of most elements around it, this molecule is not very likely to exist unless in very special environments with high oxygen concentration (such as pure oxygen atmosphere or in liquid oxygen, maybe).
    20:30 Another quite unstable and unlikely to be found in nature molecule, trioxidane

    • @D.S69
      @D.S69 10 місяців тому +1

      cool

    • @D.S69
      @D.S69 10 місяців тому +1

      cool

    • @ghoust592
      @ghoust592 10 місяців тому

      Tetraoxygen is real. The name is Oxozone and its V E R Y A N G R Y

    • @rachelkuan
      @rachelkuan 9 місяців тому +1

      cooler

  • @cal6464
    @cal6464 10 місяців тому +176

    Ngl watching your brain fall apart at naming h2o2 had me in pieces 😂

  • @Christian-jc6gf
    @Christian-jc6gf 10 місяців тому +80

    4:00 I know this one, America has been liquidating its supply of helium for quite some time, selling it at a very low price because the government simply has no use for it anymore (Idk what they even needed it for in the first place), which means that due to supply and demand things like helium balloons for birthdays were a viable product. Once they sell it all though then helium balloons will be super expensive.
    Also that fact about helium on the moon is worded pretty poorly. The only reason why we would want to go to the moon for helium is because theres lots of helium-3 there. The helium we use normally is He-4, which coincidentally makes up 99.99% of helium on earth. The only practical use for lunar He-3 would be as a fusion feedstock (right now we use tritium, which is radioactive and apparently quite difficult to work with), but considering we haven't even solved sustainable fusion yet, its a moot point to mine it on the moon

    • @Dragongaga
      @Dragongaga 10 місяців тому +29

      Helium is actually vital for hospitals because it's needed to cool MRI machines and the US government selling off the stocks is to the detriment of healthcare. Helium should be strictly controlled and not allowed to escape, because most Helium that escapes into the environment is lost and can't be recovered

    • @fsociety6983
      @fsociety6983 3 місяці тому +1

      @@Dragongaga It is, but obviously hospitals get access to it first. It's necessary for hospitals, doesn't mean that hospitals struggle to get it.

    • @Dragongaga
      @Dragongaga 3 місяці тому

      @@fsociety6983 I didn't say that they struggle, I just said it's bad to just sell it off. It's one of those things that is not allowed to run out, like petrol and diesel. When supply is low, you won't not be able to get it if you need it, it will just be very expensive and it's the same for gas. If you allow people to waste it for pointless things, they will do just that

  • @rpgaholic8202
    @rpgaholic8202 10 місяців тому +182

    "What do we do when chemists tell their final joke and pass on?" "We barium."

    • @panda-yi6mg
      @panda-yi6mg 6 місяців тому +2

      🥲🥲😭😭😂😂😭😭

    • @JestersWing
      @JestersWing 3 місяці тому +3

      What do you do with a sick chemist?
      Try and curium.

  • @jakejager
    @jakejager 10 місяців тому +273

    I haven't studied chemistry in over 30 years...wish the game would tell us what molecules you are building...learning opp lost 🙁

    • @dwisri9561
      @dwisri9561 7 місяців тому +11

      later in the game or an update, you can kinda!

    • @kingofnothing2260
      @kingofnothing2260 6 місяців тому +1

      You can Google them

    • @jakejager
      @jakejager 6 місяців тому +14

      @@kingofnothing2260 that's not the point though...

    • @kingofnothing2260
      @kingofnothing2260 6 місяців тому +4

      @@jakejager I get it. Wishing it was better, I agree, but still possible with a little extra on your part or use godot to build a better one.

    • @LarsEckert_Molimo
      @LarsEckert_Molimo 2 місяці тому

      @@kingofnothing2260 if you can name them. Plus, you can google everything, why don't you know everything?

  • @robertlenders8755
    @robertlenders8755 10 місяців тому +117

    SpaceChem was the ultimate chemistry based puzzle game

    • @philippzander6494
      @philippzander6494 10 місяців тому +22

      Molek-Syntez and Opus Magnum are also two very interesting Zach games, highly recommend👌

    • @petertaylor4980
      @petertaylor4980 10 місяців тому +2

      Atomix on the Amiga was good.

    • @Atlessa
      @Atlessa 10 місяців тому +1

      Thank you!

    • @WackoMcGoose
      @WackoMcGoose 10 місяців тому

      @@philippzander6494 Opus Magnum is one of the only Zachtronics games I was able to finish the _entire_ main campaign of without using a guide... Those games are crazy-go-nuts hard past the midpoint, but in a fun way!

  • @Ithrandiel_Archives
    @Ithrandiel_Archives 10 місяців тому +167

    What do acid and the military have in common?
    They both neutralize bases
    Two chemists walk into a bar, the first asks for h2o, the second asks for h2o too, and dies

    • @BennyLlama39
      @BennyLlama39 10 місяців тому +9

      Why do the words "face palm" suddenly come to mind? 😀

    • @wesleythomas7125
      @wesleythomas7125 10 місяців тому +14

      Timmy had a tummt ache,
      But he aent no more!
      What he thought was H²O,
      Was H²SO⁴

    • @link_team3855
      @link_team3855 10 місяців тому

      H2O-hno

  • @Mike__B
    @Mike__B 10 місяців тому +47

    Reminds me of a more simplistic version of the game SpaceChem... which started out fun and interesting, then very quickly got to a level of mind boggling mad.

    • @npiper
      @npiper 10 місяців тому +4

      That's just Zachtronics games in a nutshell.

    • @darthurza
      @darthurza 10 місяців тому +3

      Which is perfect reason why Matt should play that game xd

  • @WouterVerbruggen
    @WouterVerbruggen 10 місяців тому +34

    Helium is rare on earth because its so light it escapes our atmosphere when released. In our lab we use a lot of liquid helium. We have a recovery system, so we pay 25 euro per litre of liquid. If we hadn't, we would have to pay 45.

  • @teiladam1314
    @teiladam1314 3 місяці тому +6

    0:11 My chemical Engineer soul just cried up hearing that! Chemical industry is a big part of the industry and they need engineers!!

  • @jeffersonchau7171
    @jeffersonchau7171 10 місяців тому +21

    I might suggest this to my chemistry teacher this looks very fun to do if it’s available for free.
    And here’s a fun fact that wasn’t mentioned yet:
    Certain elements have to be diatomic meaning they can’t exist in nature without it being bonded to itself. The best way to learn it is with the acronym:
    Br.I.N.Cl.H.O.F (Brinklehof). Bromine, Iodine, Nitrogen, Chlorine, Hydrogen, Oxygen, and Flouride.

    • @takatacheroki2624
      @takatacheroki2624 9 місяців тому

      "Brinklehof" sounds like a ridiculous swear and I love it. I'm tempted to use it as another word for "buffoon" lol

    • @SirRebrl
      @SirRebrl 7 місяців тому +4

      *Fluorine
      The -ide suffix is used when referring to ionic bonds. A common example of this with another of those elements is Sodium + Chlorine = Sodium Chloride.

  • @half55-qo1tq
    @half55-qo1tq 10 місяців тому +19

    12:05 you used the wrong formula to get the correct answer. Plus sign means it's positively charged, i.e missing an electron. And hydrogen atom without electron is just a proton.

  • @MagicChemist7920
    @MagicChemist7920 10 місяців тому +33

    As a chemistry major in college currently, I can confirm. Chemistry is confusing and hard

    • @BenziLZK
      @BenziLZK 10 місяців тому +2

      it was all fun and game until bio part comes in, I can't see carbon the same way ever again 💀

    • @randommixes7615
      @randommixes7615 9 місяців тому +2

      @@BenziLZK as someone who took interest in chemistry and biology in highschool(Finnish) the organic chemistry was quite nice and then came the aminoacids TAC AGA GAA TAG AAA TCG GGC ATC(first and last are intentional rest random)

    • @samuraijackson241
      @samuraijackson241 Місяць тому

      @@randommixes7615I am studying biological sciences (yes, that’s the name of the major) and I can also feel the pain of remembering the 20 amino acids, though my major is obviously more lean towards the “biology” part.
      At this point, I can safely say that biology stands side by side with chemistry and physics as being the most confusing subject.

  • @evilbob840
    @evilbob840 10 місяців тому +9

    I did know the part about birds and capsacin, apparently there is a species of shrew that has evolved to not be effected either.

  • @elanimate3142
    @elanimate3142 10 місяців тому +20

    When I did A-level chemistry, the first thing the teacher said was “everything we taught you about before, forget it, we lied”. Obviously it’s good to know the basic concepts but a lot of stuff you basically have to relearn

    • @Piglin_Emperor
      @Piglin_Emperor 7 місяців тому +2

      Me: **Already Knowing About The Beta Capture (Idk How it's Called in English but the thing where the Electron Falls on a Proton and they Make a Neutron and happens in Atoms with too Many Protons compared to neutrons) while the Teacher explains that Electrons orbit the Nucleus**
      My Brain: Those are 3.2 Terabytes. You sure you want to delete.
      Me: No.

    • @OceanPig
      @OceanPig 5 місяців тому

      Relatable

  • @paulk5670
    @paulk5670 10 місяців тому +28

    Engineering has nothing on chemistry.
    *Chemical Engineers have entered chat*

  • @Arwen_xx
    @Arwen_xx 10 місяців тому +12

    A lot of the facts are just not quite enough information for me.. why does copper treat drinking water? I can’t tell if that’s designed to encourage you to look into it yourself but it is mildly frustrating

  • @der.Schtefan
    @der.Schtefan 10 місяців тому +14

    Helium-4 on earth is so rare, there was a shortage not long ago. Helium-3 is present on the moon and has a lot of potential for fusion.

  • @JulesExplica
    @JulesExplica 10 місяців тому +4

    I discovered you last year and can quite honestly say that your videos help me laugh every aingle time, during quite a rough moment I am going through.
    Thank you for being so genuine.

  • @SullySadface
    @SullySadface 10 місяців тому +9

    17:11 That's a square, Matt.

    • @tokoonz_00
      @tokoonz_00 10 місяців тому +1

      I was about to bring it up !
      Yes, a four sided circle is a square.

  • @KawaiiMr.Dimples
    @KawaiiMr.Dimples 10 місяців тому +1

    I was a Chemical Engineering student later changed to Psychology, but this part of Chemistry just tingles my mind and I miss balancing chemicals now

  • @danielkosko2908
    @danielkosko2908 10 місяців тому +2

    1:46 " Do I need to worry that their spinning" 😂they have been spinning the whole time Matt lmao

  • @Virtuous_Rogue
    @Virtuous_Rogue 9 місяців тому +2

    6:41 Made me think of an actual technical term in biochemistry: disulfide bridges. Sulfur loves making extra bonds, so some amino acids with sulfur in them will bond to each other inside a protein adding structural integrity to the whole protein.
    Edit: 13:30 I did my undergrad in chemical engineering and biochemistry and between the two covered about 3/4ths of the chemistry degree requirements. TBH the most confusing part of chemistry is the beginning because there are tons of rules and you don't have a foundation or framework to piece everything together. Organic chemistry is fairly straightforward, there's just a ton of it. Same thing with biochemistry. Physical Chemistry is a lot of backfilling the "why" of the rules from gen chem. Quantum mechanics of bonding is admittedly a bit crazy but in an undergrad degree you don't really explore it at all.

  • @gabrielsantos2430
    @gabrielsantos2430 7 місяців тому +2

    7:25 - It is called hydrogen peroxide because of the oxygen's oxidation number (NOX) of -1. Oxides have a NOX of -2, peroxides have a NOX of -1, and superoxides have a NOX of -1/2.
    NOX is the difference between the electrical charge of an atom in its neutral state and its bonded state.

  • @yayrayday
    @yayrayday 10 місяців тому +4

    18:40 That's also why some people will put older copper pennies (actual copper content) into their small pet water dishes, as it combats bacteria growth and stops it getting scummy as quickly

  • @nathangamble125
    @nathangamble125 10 місяців тому +7

    The "bond and a half" thing you were thinking of might have been hydrogen bonds.
    There is a covalent bond between the oxygen and hydrogen of the same molecule, but there are additional bonds (hydrogen bonds) between the oxygen and hydrogen atoms of separate water molecules. Hydrogen bonds are a lot weaker than covalent bonds, but they're a lot stronger than normal intermolecular forces, and they're the reason why water is a liquid at room temperature rather than a gas despite its low molecular weight.
    The molecule with 2 oxygens, 1 nitrogen, and 1 hydrogen is actually called nitrous acid. Nitric acid has 3 oxygen atoms.
    The positive charges on ions aren't extra protons, they're just missing electrons (often called "holes" in electronics). If an atom had extra protons, it would be a different element - e.g. oxygen with 2 extra protons would be neon.
    This game reminds me a lot of THE CODEX OF ALCHEMICAL ENGINEERING, which is a cool game that I think you should play (especially since it has engineering in the name). You have to build and program a machine to manipulate the alchemical elements (how people previously understood elements before modern chemistry) and make them bond together into specific structures. It was originally built in Flash, but can still be played on a website called numuki using emulation (it used to work in Kongregate with the ruffle emulator, but doesn't seem to any more).

    • @nathangamble125
      @nathangamble125 10 місяців тому +2

      There is also a sequel to The Codex Of Alchemical Engineering called "Opus magnum" available on Steam.

  • @BonjaminShmonjamin
    @BonjaminShmonjamin 10 місяців тому +12

    21:54 "Capskin" 😂😂

    • @Lu13s
      @Lu13s 10 місяців тому +1

      XD maybe it's a British thing?

  • @nobody.of.importance
    @nobody.of.importance 10 місяців тому +2

    Not only is rust responsible for Mars red hues, it was also a key player in the early earth and life's earliest days. See, the atmosphere was largely made up of inert gasses, such as diatomic nitrogen, carbon dioxide, and methane, common components of volcano outgassing. Life at the time was anaerobic, meaning it didn't use oxygen in it's metabolism in any way, but the oceans were *rich* with iron. Just floating around in the water, chillin. Suddenly these new bacteria come along and start photosynthesis proper, using sunlight to break apart CO2 molecules and turning them into sugar and O2. And boy oh boy did they pump out a LOT of O2. So much so that it started seeping into the oceans, and in turn binding with all that free floating iron. This kept the atmospheric levels of O2 at low enough levels that life was able to adapt to the oxygen entering the atmosphere, but scientists estimate it could have wiped out up to 80% of any life that existed up to that point. It's called the Great Oxidation Event, if anyone wants to look into it. It's pretty neat.

  • @ChuckyG.
    @ChuckyG. 10 місяців тому +5

    15:00 I was always taught that cations were positive since cats->pawsitive

    • @cloverisfan818
      @cloverisfan818 10 місяців тому

      I was taught that the t in cation looks like a plus sign and anion has the letter n which stands for negative

    • @scratchtutorials7860
      @scratchtutorials7860 10 місяців тому

      @@cloverisfan818 I was taught that 'cat'ions 'cat'ch the metal in electroplating.

    • @samuraijackson241
      @samuraijackson241 Місяць тому

      I just hard memorise cations and anions.

  • @photoo848
    @photoo848 10 місяців тому +3

    06:35 RCE nerd sniping himself with the "Hang on, I need to google this" :D

  • @jefmoechars4967
    @jefmoechars4967 10 місяців тому +2

    6:23 RCE: "THERE'S A BRIDGE!" me: "Bridge review??"

  • @screwlose
    @screwlose 10 місяців тому +8

    HAHAHAHA Laughs in SPACE-chem at this puny game

  • @captainmurphy4720
    @captainmurphy4720 10 місяців тому +46

    CHEMICAL ENGINEER>CIVIL ENGINEER>ARCHITECT?

    • @ThatAnnoyingGuyOnTheInternet
      @ThatAnnoyingGuyOnTheInternet 10 місяців тому +5

      Chemical Engineer > Civil Engineer > Everyone else > Architect
      FIFY

    • @ukaszwieczorek211
      @ukaszwieczorek211 10 місяців тому +2

      This is exactly right. Did you heard about Chemical Architects, no? Because chemistry is so hard, no architect will ever try to figure it out.

  • @DjNexus69
    @DjNexus69 10 місяців тому +11

    Irony when you're doing chemistry battery jokes then say you're running out...

  • @Roberts_good_channel
    @Roberts_good_channel Місяць тому +1

    1:37 endangered means something where there is not many of them left

  • @Noah_AC
    @Noah_AC 9 місяців тому +2

    "Ohh we unlocked epsilon levels!"
    "I'm not actually feeling the brown, poo levels"
    💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀

  • @ardiansyahkesuma7464
    @ardiansyahkesuma7464 10 місяців тому +5

    The new "Fun Fact with Matt" is amazing. Really love it 🤯

  • @maryl2459
    @maryl2459 6 днів тому

    I adored this video!
    I’m a chemistry professor! Watching you play it and talk about chemistry just delighted me!
    Thanks for this!

  • @gaysarahk
    @gaysarahk 10 місяців тому +48

    Day 41 of notifying people that the Discord server's Suggestions forum is a better place to suggest new games to Matt. (Just don't ping him!)

  • @drucy.
    @drucy. 10 місяців тому +11

    11:48 Wait until Matt learn that the same reaction (iron oxide/rust) also happens in our blood and that's why blood is red.

    • @broklond
      @broklond 10 місяців тому +1

      Poorly worded, but yes, Fe(III) compounds are red and hemoglobin is an Fe(III) compound

    • @samuraijackson241
      @samuraijackson241 Місяць тому

      @@broklondwell, technically it can be Fe(ll) or Fe(lll), depending on whether it is oxygen bound or not.

  • @Ardo202
    @Ardo202 10 місяців тому +20

    how do you tell the difference between an engineer and an chemist? ask them to pronounce "unionised"

    • @OceanPig
      @OceanPig 5 місяців тому

      Union-ised vs Un-ion-ised

  • @brooosky
    @brooosky 10 місяців тому +1

    7:52 i just begun chemistry, but i believe it is called nitrous acid

  • @BennyLlama39
    @BennyLlama39 10 місяців тому +3

    Matt: (reading caption) "No cling-ons under this boat."
    Me: Cling-ons? What about Romulans? 😀 (I know, stupid joke.)

    • @stylesrj
      @stylesrj 10 місяців тому

      And are they on the starboard-bow?

    • @BennyLlama39
      @BennyLlama39 10 місяців тому

      @@stylesrj I take it that's a reference to the old Star Trekkin' song.

    • @stylesrj
      @stylesrj 10 місяців тому

      @@BennyLlama39
      Yes.

  • @sebbes333
    @sebbes333 10 місяців тому +3

    *@Real Civil Engineer*
    If you liked that game, you will love: *SpaceChem*
    It is basically the same, but you can do many more things with the molecule creators.

  • @CrazedKen
    @CrazedKen 10 місяців тому +3

    I love doing chemistry puns but i never get a reaction 😢.
    6:34 2 scientists walk into a bar, 1 ask for h2o and the other wanted some h2o too. The other died. Why?
    I am stealing ALL of these jokes and tell them to my science teacher.

  • @Sonatengraf
    @Sonatengraf 10 місяців тому

    17:40 Don't let your editors fool you, RCE, your humorous jokes and intriguing insights are much appreciated.

  • @Blackwing2345635
    @Blackwing2345635 6 місяців тому

    4:58 surprisingly haven't found any comments about this, though I've scrolled down quiet a bit.
    It is interesting. Not all elements are created directly by stars, both through their lifetime on a main sequence (when they "burn" stuff "normally" via fusion) and when they explode. A lot of elements are produced only via fission, proton capture, neutron capture, etc. outside of stars.
    Also you may think, that stars produce all the elements up to iron during their lifetime. But in reality there are gaps.
    For example a gap between helium and carbon - if a star is big enough to create lithium, it is also big enough to create beryllium, boron, and carbon. So Li, Be, B are always just intermediate products, that are either used up for carbon, or decay. All of those three we have outside stars were produced outside of them by heavier elements decay. Except some trace amounts of lithium that was created with hydrogen and helium before stars.
    Even from carbon to iron it is mostly even elements, because each subsequent step is an element + helium. There are odd elements in this range too, but in small amounts - they are mostly products of decay outside of stars.
    And, sure, supernovae. Processes here are violent and pretty complex, and you can say they produce almost everything heavier than iron, but a lot of them are as very short-lived isotopes. IIRC pretty stable isotope composition in those processes have nickel, cobalt, cooper, silver, gold, platinum, zinc, and some actinoids like uranium and thorium. Everything else we can find is rather a product of non-stellar fission and proton capture.
    So, only about half of all _naturally occurred_ elements is from stars more or less directly, maybe slightly more. Another half has pretty complicated paths outside of stars and supernovae for most atoms.
    And then there are 28 synthetic elements (meaning they are too unstable to be found in nature in meaningful amounts or at all). Including promethium and technetium, that are not that heavy, but they just have unfortunate configurations.
    And, of course, hydrogen is not created in stars at all, because no stars are capable of fusing quarks)
    P.S. for me the most fascinating part is that unevenness. For a very long time I thought, that you can just split all elements in sections by their atomic number like "primordial elements", "created in stars", "created in supernovae", "synthetic", but reality decided it would be to easy and boring))0) And, of course, not all atoms even below iron are from stars - they also could easily be fission products.

  • @forgewolfgames
    @forgewolfgames 10 місяців тому +3

    Fun fact about helium: helium is rare due to two factors 1) the rapid depletion of sources by humans, and 2) due to helium being lighter than air it just keeps going once released into atmosphere until it disperses into space

    • @UKMonkey
      @UKMonkey 10 місяців тому +1

      It's not that it's lighter than air that's the problem - it's the fact that it's light enough that its escape velocity is a speed that it can obtain in our atmosphere - meaning that it is able to complete depart earths gravitational field, unlike other gasses, such as O2 or O3.

    • @forgewolfgames
      @forgewolfgames 10 місяців тому

      @UKMonkey I'm confused are you agreeing with me or not, you say it's not that it's lighter than air than proceed to say that it's so much lighter than air that it reaches escape velocity.

    • @nbboxhead3866
      @nbboxhead3866 10 місяців тому

      @@forgewolfgames Maybe what they're saying is that a gas can be lighter than air and stay in the top layers of the atmosphere, but Helium gains enough velocity on the way up that it just shoots off into space. I wouldn't know if it's possible or not but I think it is.

    • @littlebear274
      @littlebear274 10 місяців тому

      @@nbboxhead3866 That's how I'm reading it as well. As far as I know it's the only gas that is light enough to do that, I've seen it referred to as the only truly non-renewable resource because of it. Presumably there are quite a few gases that are lighter than air, but heavy enough that they'd rise slower than helium does and therefore never get fast enough to escape the gravity of the Earth.

    • @nbboxhead3866
      @nbboxhead3866 10 місяців тому

      @@littlebear274 Hydrogen is also light enough to, but reacts with oxygen to make water before escaping I think. All things lighter than Carbon apart from those two are metals/metaloids, and are solid at earth temperatures.

  • @amontpetit
    @amontpetit 10 місяців тому +31

    Answering the important questions: The He we use for party balloons and other "common uses" is different to the "rare" one we need for specific lab uses (like cooling MRI machines). Different isotopes.

    • @eredaane4656
      @eredaane4656 10 місяців тому +2

      And helium is pretty common, its just a pain to get out of the fossil fuel gases. It originates from radioactive decay (alpha-decay).

    • @alext8828
      @alext8828 10 місяців тому +1

      Why is it that He4 isn't used in MRIs, if you know?

    • @WouterVerbruggen
      @WouterVerbruggen 10 місяців тому +6

      ​​@@alext8828 because he's wrong, they use "just" ordinary liquid helium which is primarily helium 4. Helium 3 is used in much more exotic things and it is extremely expensive.

    • @jimmymcgoochie5363
      @jimmymcgoochie5363 10 місяців тому +9

      That’s completely untrue- helium in balloons and helium in MRI machines is the same thing, 4He. It’s used in balloons as it’s lighter than air, and elsewhere because it liquefies at a temperature best described as “marginally above the cold dark vacuum of interstellar space” and so keeps things like superconducting electromagnets nice and superconduct-y and electromagnet-y. It’s formed naturally from alpha decay of radioisotopes in the ground and because it’s so light it just floats off the top of Earth’s atmosphere and gets blown away by the solar wind, so using it for stupid things like balloons is a complete waste of a valuable and finite resource.
      The far rarer 3He is what they’re looking for on the Moon as it’s potentially usable in fusion reactors.

    • @walkir2662
      @walkir2662 10 місяців тому +3

      @@eredaane4656 Helium is pretty common *in the universe*. Earth is much too weak to stop helium from escaping into space, so there's not much holding it here.
      Be glad about that, if gravity was strong enough to keep in helium, we wouldn't be here.^

  • @DennouNeko
    @DennouNeko 10 місяців тому

    Your bond with editors is showing really well in this one, Matt.

  • @mtbrocket
    @mtbrocket 10 місяців тому

    Great video. Nice game. 😊 I don’t know what’s worse: Matt telling chemistry puns or no, no, that’s the worst. 😂
    You can call the plus circles orbiting the atom “holes” as they are just the absence of electrons. Then you can do all kinds of hole related innuendos. 😂

  • @kitenofs2259
    @kitenofs2259 2 місяці тому +6

    i am unreasonably annoyed by the fact that they made a chemistry game on a square grid instead of a hexagon one

    • @AsgharH238
      @AsgharH238 Місяць тому

      There is no cyclopropane or cyclopentane

  • @ejmoschetta5921
    @ejmoschetta5921 7 місяців тому +1

    6:28 needs a bridge review 😂

  • @soup9242
    @soup9242 9 місяців тому +1

    4:13 That would be formaldehyde.
    7:46 is nitrous acid. Nitric acid has one extra oxygen atom.

  • @PaulCraftEightteen
    @PaulCraftEightteen 10 місяців тому

    Time Stamps:
    0:20 making dihydrogen
    0:59 making water
    1:43 making ammonia
    2:34 making methane
    4:13 making formaldehyde
    5:14 making water again
    6:20 making hydrogen peroxide
    7:41 making nitrous acid
    8:31 making hydrazine
    10:33 making nitrous acid again
    12:03 making dihydrogen again
    13:35 making water again
    14:18 making water again
    15:09 making nitrous acid again
    16:03 making tetraoxygen
    17:55 making nitroxyl
    18:52 making methane again
    20:06 making trioxidane
    21:13 making ammonia again

  • @Lu13s
    @Lu13s 10 місяців тому

    I wish i knew about this game when I took chem in high school. I bet my old high school teacher would've loved this.

  • @aafrophonee
    @aafrophonee 4 місяці тому

    3:42 I'm a PhD student in Physics who does experimental research at low temperatures. Liquid helium is EXTREMELY EXPENSIVE now because we are running out. It's so expensive that it's affecting how many experiments I can do for the rest of my degree.

  • @fruitfulconnoisseur
    @fruitfulconnoisseur 10 місяців тому +1

    8:16 Matt's best Star Trek joke

  • @nicholaswastakenwastaken
    @nicholaswastakenwastaken 10 місяців тому +3

    matt deserves a chemistry degree at this point

  • @SynSpiderz
    @SynSpiderz 10 місяців тому +2

    Im not sure what was worse, organic or inorganic chemistry. Learning the chemistry of medicines was a ballache

    • @angelictakiko5341
      @angelictakiko5341 10 місяців тому

      We figured this out some years ago. What we devised was: you can either be good at quant chem or orgo. There is no in-between, and PCC majors wanted nothing but pain(t) from life (and well money obviously). - Biochem students et. al. circa 2013.

    • @cjhickspe1399
      @cjhickspe1399 10 місяців тому +1

      My school bookstore sold bumper stickers with "Honk if you passed P-Chem" on them.

  • @friendlylisek
    @friendlylisek 10 місяців тому

    As a first sokobond game and spacechem fan this game is just perfect :>

  • @aydendejong451
    @aydendejong451 10 місяців тому

    Your jokes are so insanely great, I am having a blast every single time.

  • @DepressedMusicEnjoyer
    @DepressedMusicEnjoyer 10 місяців тому +1

    Real engineers can distinguish between a level physics (which they have taken) and a level chemistry (which they have not)

    • @RealCivilEngineerGaming
      @RealCivilEngineerGaming  10 місяців тому

      I didn't take a level physics, I took a level chemistry... thanks for trying to educated me about my past though... 🙂

    • @DepressedMusicEnjoyer
      @DepressedMusicEnjoyer 10 місяців тому +1

      @@RealCivilEngineerGamingI am afraid that makes you not a real engineer 😮

    • @DepressedMusicEnjoyer
      @DepressedMusicEnjoyer 10 місяців тому

      You’ve been an architect all along :(

    • @DepressedMusicEnjoyer
      @DepressedMusicEnjoyer 10 місяців тому

      @@RealCivilEngineerGamingon a serious note, what were your other a levels out of curiosity?

  • @cosmicmirrorstorm1797
    @cosmicmirrorstorm1797 10 місяців тому

    This is awesome. As many have mentioned, based on another great old game

  • @BanaNO500
    @BanaNO500 10 місяців тому

    Pretty sure that the amount of dots circling it has something to do about chemistry itself, though I could be wrong.

  • @CoolNameBabe
    @CoolNameBabe 10 місяців тому

    So sounds like Matt has mad respect for us Environmental Engineers, since we’re basically civil engineers + chemistry (and biology) 😊

  • @HugoMejia-u6x
    @HugoMejia-u6x 9 місяців тому

    Imagine you could connect them differently and it makes a different elements it'll take forever to figure out all the combinations

  • @minili837
    @minili837 10 місяців тому +1

    3:50 rce: hang on if it is so rare that we thinking going to the moon to mine it why are we just filling balloons with it?' Me: HAHAHAHAHAHAHHA hey what about the balloon carrying the human *i forgot what its call 💩*

  • @astridkrist6834
    @astridkrist6834 10 місяців тому

    Genius Video! Thanks a lot! 🥰🤗

  • @PaulyD-m8k
    @PaulyD-m8k 5 місяців тому

    HELP- "we'll take your dandelions, we'll make tyres out of it." 😭

  • @lukchem
    @lukchem 10 місяців тому +1

    The name Hydrogenperoxide comes from the charge of the Oxygen Atoms. Normally they are 2x negative charged, forming normal oxides. But when they are only 1x negative charged the form an Peroxide like Hydrogenperoxide.

  • @averymarshall6060
    @averymarshall6060 10 місяців тому

    Helium fits though the ozone layer and just floats off into space as far as I can remember

  • @marithietbrink3352
    @marithietbrink3352 9 днів тому

    If you like this, try project chemistry! It's a bit more difficult though

  • @VaupellGaming
    @VaupellGaming 10 місяців тому

    If you like this, then the next level of Chem games would be the old "SpaceChem" on steam from 2011, it was legendary on doing this, but also somewhat more difficult. 😉

  • @Konrad-z9w
    @Konrad-z9w 10 місяців тому

    I think I've seen a documentary once about Helium3 on the moon, called "Iron Sky"

  • @Madhav_Bhartia
    @Madhav_Bhartia 9 місяців тому

    I died on the inside when I heard him say... cations (cash-ions) and anions (onions)...
    it's supposed to be cations (cat-ions(as in ion)) and anions (an-ions). 💀😂

  • @PianoHamsters
    @PianoHamsters 10 місяців тому

    My favorite part of these videos is when Matt’s editors make fun of him 😂

  • @y0y4y0
    @y0y4y0 10 місяців тому

    Came to the channel for the games, bridges and Pad, staying for the chemistry puns.

  • @aaronablan3359
    @aaronablan3359 Місяць тому

    Hey Matt! Endangered means that there are not many left of that material 😊

  • @YoungGandalf2325
    @YoungGandalf2325 10 місяців тому +1

    If I had this game in college, maybe I wouldn't have failed organic chemistry. 😅

  • @nuwame591
    @nuwame591 10 місяців тому

    21:03 you have summoned the whole fandom

  • @raphass22
    @raphass22 10 місяців тому

    This game reminded me of SpaceChem! What a game that one is

  • @glitchmenlord4790
    @glitchmenlord4790 10 місяців тому

    Fun fact the helium on the moon is helium 3, a possible source for cheap and easy fusion

  • @Smithers888
    @Smithers888 10 місяців тому

    15:00 And the opposite is cat-ions which is positive because cats make people happy.

  • @vorno102
    @vorno102 5 місяців тому +1

    Laughs in Chemical Engineering.

  • @theender664
    @theender664 7 місяців тому

    19:56 what do they mean by that?
    i've never separated laundry in my life
    and nothing ever happend XD

  • @fwa8590
    @fwa8590 7 місяців тому

    In an alternate timeline, RCE will stand for Real Chemical Engineer

  • @lucifersatan8240
    @lucifersatan8240 4 місяці тому

    3:59 Some types are far rarer than others. There is almost no helium 3 here but plenty on the moon. Fun fact about helium 3: it's a candidate for elements useful in nuclear fusion.
    I think at least. I know helium 3 is very valuable when other helium isotopes aren't.

  • @TycerKirk
    @TycerKirk 10 місяців тому

    Also the bond between H and O is strong as the oxygen is highly electronegative, attracting the electrons more, so the O becomes slightly -, the H becomes slightly +

  • @floppy8568
    @floppy8568 10 місяців тому

    The + near "atoms" (they're actually called ions now) still means the atom has lost an electron, not gain a proton. If it gained a proton, then that would make another element.

  • @GK34779
    @GK34779 10 місяців тому

    Those chemistry puns were amazing! you certainly out-punned me.

    • @BennyLlama39
      @BennyLlama39 10 місяців тому +1

      So you're out of your element? 😀 (I'll see myself out.)

    • @GK34779
      @GK34779 10 місяців тому +1

      🤣@@BennyLlama39

  • @kyanobiemen8038
    @kyanobiemen8038 7 місяців тому

    I am watching this at 23:30 (irl time), my brain is not braining no more

  • @joshabbott3856
    @joshabbott3856 10 місяців тому

    Chem student here, I’ve been waiting for this day for so long

  • @lisamagnussonbiel5695
    @lisamagnussonbiel5695 10 місяців тому

    Is it just me or are the dogs in his facts grafic the dogs from Barbie and the Diamond Castle? If so, what a fun little reference xD

  • @nathanjordan1782
    @nathanjordan1782 10 місяців тому

    “Civil engineers make targets” -my pops the petrochemical engineer