He’s not gonna pay Mike Raible 12 million a year and Josh McDaniels for million a year no way in hell he’s a cheap cheap cheapskate penny pension he loves the dollar like nobody else
Mayo being wishy-washy here is ANOTHER example of his startling lack of media/communications savvy. Since his rash of walk-backs, his adaptation has been a little "say nothing," like Bill, but more "sound like it could go either way," and it's not smooth. It comes across as CYA, not cleverly side-stepping. Mayo's comments weren't his worst, but it sounded like he hadn't fully decided yet, NOT "I'm not answering you directly."
How will they finish? Against the Bills' back-ups? Against a team that will play this as if it were a pre-season game? Who cares? Starting Maye is so stupid. Fire everybody.
Well Nick, I'm not okay with the Eagles sitting Barkley either. Can some football nerd do some numbers on this? My guess is, the probability of this happening is low. Nick, your crossing the road analogy is a false equivalency. Drake's not at "higher risk" in this game than any other.
Nick, by your logic, the NFL should cancel a game like Sunday's. After all, WHAT IS THE POINT? One hundred and six players careers are on the line! They could ALL get injured in a "meaningless" game. MY point is you are arbitrarily deciding 1) the possibility of injury to ONE player should determine the entire tenor of this game. I know the messaging has been mentioned and no, it's not nothing. 2) an arbitrary deduction of "meaninglessness" to this game. I get it--Drake IS the franchise now. And they play football. I could, using YOUR logic, have said that LAST WEEK was meaningless as well. What if Maye really had been seriously injured then? Was LAST WEEK's game "more meaningful" than this week's? NO. Not really. Because this is the "last game" we arbitrarily--not logically--assign it as "meaningless." I could argue their entire last month has been "meaningless," .... or I could say that EVERY game has meaning. Completely subjective.
Thanks for the show boys,
sad to say this, but i gave him plenty of time. I'm on the "fire Mayo" wagon
Well, hopefully they'll finish with the number 1 pick...no point in winning now.
42:40 we can only hope
Question that I'm surprised hasn't been brought up more: is now the time for Jonathan to control the team?
They finish this debacle with another one. A win over the bills backups and Kraft giving Mayo another year.
He’s not gonna pay Mike Raible 12 million a year and Josh McDaniels for million a year no way in hell he’s a cheap cheap cheapskate penny pension he loves the dollar like nobody else
Heck, I was gonna say 98.5 should give you guys a slot.
Kraft better get crafty and go get Vrable while he has the chance to
If not Vrabel then Gruden wants back in.
The league hates Gruden. Stay far away from him.
@Mooseman327 Lots of people hate lots of other people.
Who cares?
I want to win.
It's not my decision anyway.
37:56 the whole league is filled with tools. It’s WWE. makes me sick and not want to watch.
Mayo being wishy-washy here is ANOTHER example of his startling lack of media/communications savvy. Since his rash of walk-backs, his adaptation has been a little "say nothing," like Bill, but more "sound like it could go either way," and it's not smooth. It comes across as CYA, not cleverly side-stepping. Mayo's comments weren't his worst, but it sounded like he hadn't fully decided yet, NOT "I'm not answering you directly."
If they pull a NYG that's will be the reason I never watch again
The could win this one. The Bills have reason to rest starters and the Patriots have reason to play for an ineffectual but popular Coach.
Nick, why are you questioning anything the coaching staff general manager They’re all jackasses.
How will they finish? Against the Bills' back-ups? Against a team that will play this as if it were a pre-season game? Who cares? Starting Maye is so stupid. Fire everybody.
Well Nick, I'm not okay with the Eagles sitting Barkley either.
Can some football nerd do some numbers on this? My guess is, the probability of this happening is low.
Nick, your crossing the road analogy is a false equivalency. Drake's not at "higher risk" in this game than any other.
Nick, by your logic, the NFL should cancel a game like Sunday's. After all, WHAT IS THE POINT? One hundred and six players careers are on the line! They could ALL get injured in a "meaningless" game.
MY point is you are arbitrarily deciding 1) the possibility of injury to ONE player should determine the entire tenor of this game. I know the messaging has been mentioned and no, it's not nothing. 2) an arbitrary deduction of "meaninglessness" to this game. I get it--Drake IS the franchise now. And they play football. I could, using YOUR logic, have said that LAST WEEK was meaningless as well. What if Maye really had been seriously injured then? Was LAST WEEK's game "more meaningful" than this week's? NO. Not really. Because this is the "last game" we arbitrarily--not logically--assign it as "meaningless." I could argue their entire last month has been "meaningless," .... or I could say that EVERY game has meaning. Completely subjective.