DSP by Oppenheim and Schafer....I got a copy when I was in college, 40 years ago! That is the first copy I've seen in someone else's possession in all this time.
Since the OP left it unanswered, I'll try to explain it the way I see: The main idea of the capital is that it subjects all spheres of social life, turning it into terms, that maintain its own existence. So, we have a certain self-contained system, that feeds into itself. I'm not sure it's a good metaphor (since there are lots of neural networks publications out there, which aren't easy to study), but the "Capital" itself is still among the most significant books you might want to read. Not sure, if I got it right, so sorry in advance
@@alexeylapshin948 thanks! it’s a fascinating lens to view this through. will definitely look more into it. i always liked thinking of feedback akin to my meditation practice... observing myself, observing myself observing myself, etc. modular synths as mirrors to our own (nature’s) systems
@@lilskullymane4057 Exactly. Recursion is all around us, it existed long before electronics and Serge, so there’s absolutely no point in conceptualizing it that much. I believe, the most we can do with these interfaces is to master them to a degree that they become a part of our reflexes, so that we’re able to NOT think about whether they’re neurons or AI (which is doubtful), feedback or some other concepts. Meditation is best at it! I’d highly encourage you to keep meditating on sound, rather than thinking or conceptualizing the sound too much, as the more we think, the more absurd it all becomes and sounds, imo. A spiritual experience is what music is about anyway. I also find Mark Verbos' lectures on modulars to be of great value and the way he uses his greatly modified Buchla system. Regarding the book, it’s just great on its own and helps to understand the world around us better, as many other books. It’s good to look at music from other perspectives sometimes, but we have to be very careful with all this knowledge. Just some humble thoughts. Sorry in advance!
How about the feedback in a digital implementation such as FM synthesis algorithms that use it? That seems to be stable, and very functional, with great results.
@@Bestmann3n not only was my comment 2 YEARS AGO haha that isn't how digital fm synthesis works. also i imagine i was responding to something in this video about feedback and stable systems not what is and isn't a chaotic system, but honestly i don't remember 2 years later
This is very interesting. However, I am a bit lost because I don't own a Serge and don't really understand what is connected to what. If in the future you can show a drawing of the schematics it could help.
Today I am starting at your first upload, planning to bingewatch all of them! So happy I discovered the Serge universe!
Love this series, learning a ton about feedback patching, thank you!
Love your choice of synth stand!
DSP by Oppenheim and Schafer....I got a copy when I was in college, 40 years ago!
That is the first copy I've seen in someone else's possession in all this time.
would love to hear more on how marxism plays into all this!
Since the OP left it unanswered, I'll try to explain it the way I see: The main idea of the capital is that it subjects all spheres of social life, turning it into terms, that maintain its own existence. So, we have a certain self-contained system, that feeds into itself. I'm not sure it's a good metaphor (since there are lots of neural networks publications out there, which aren't easy to study), but the "Capital" itself is still among the most significant books you might want to read.
Not sure, if I got it right, so sorry in advance
@@alexeylapshin948 thanks! it’s a fascinating lens to view this through. will definitely look more into it. i always liked thinking of feedback akin to my meditation practice... observing myself, observing myself observing myself, etc. modular synths as mirrors to our own (nature’s) systems
@@lilskullymane4057 Exactly. Recursion is all around us, it existed long before electronics and Serge, so there’s absolutely no point in conceptualizing it that much.
I believe, the most we can do with these interfaces is to master them to a degree that they become a part of our reflexes, so that we’re able to NOT think about whether they’re neurons or AI (which is doubtful), feedback or some other concepts.
Meditation is best at it! I’d highly encourage you to keep meditating on sound, rather than thinking or conceptualizing the sound too much, as the more we think, the more absurd it all becomes and sounds, imo. A spiritual experience is what music is about anyway.
I also find Mark Verbos' lectures on modulars to be of great value and the way he uses his greatly modified Buchla system.
Regarding the book, it’s just great on its own and helps to understand the world around us better, as many other books.
It’s good to look at music from other perspectives sometimes, but we have to be very careful with all this knowledge.
Just some humble thoughts. Sorry in advance!
excellent discussion! cant wait for the next installment :)
Amazing demo!!! Thanks a lot!
👌🏼 excellent! Thank you
5:19 yes. That's when you know things are getting good
dope!
How about the feedback in a digital implementation such as FM synthesis algorithms that use it? That seems to be stable, and very functional, with great results.
I think chaotic systems need at least three degrees of freedom. One oscillator feeding back on itself is just one degree of freedom.
@@Bestmann3n not only was my comment 2 YEARS AGO haha that isn't how digital fm synthesis works. also i imagine i was responding to something in this video about feedback and stable systems not what is and isn't a chaotic system, but honestly i don't remember 2 years later
Love this!
this is some good ass communism
great! thanks a lot!
This is very interesting. However, I am a bit lost because I don't own a Serge and don't really understand what is connected to what. If in the future you can show a drawing of the schematics it could help.
Cool exploring feedback, I’m enjoying these videos. Last I checked synthesis had nothing to do political bent….
We see the bottom left, hello, based department??
so much yappin, not enough patching