Why DNA Will BLOW Your Mind | Ken Ham

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 14 сер 2018
  • Scientists have discovered an unmistakable language within all living things. Like a miniature library, DNA stores piles of information in extraordinary molecules that specify the details of everything from the shape of flower petals to the color of your eyes. A supremely intelligent Author and Life-Giver left His indelible message in every living thing.
    GET MORE ANSWERS: bit.ly/2nE7Fq1
    RESOURCES:
    Wonder of DNA - God's Amazing Design featuring Dr. Georgia Purdom: bit.ly/2MTTRCA
    DNA Battles - Were Adam & Eve Historical? featuring Ken Ham, Dr. Georgia Purdom, Dr. Nathaniel T. Jeanson, and Dr. Terry Mortenson: bit.ly/2MreskP
    The Code of Life - DNA, Information, and Mutation featuring Dr. Georgia Purdom: bit.ly/2w4XYoo
    The Genetics of Adam & Eve featuring Dr. Georgia Purdom: bit.ly/2OAdAYD

КОМЕНТАРІ • 100

  • @compatiblesystem
    @compatiblesystem Рік тому +130

    Science is a tool to study what is ALREADY there. I was an atheist until I started studying science and art. Then I realized and saw that God is an artist and everything around is made in perfect design. By a designer. Everything is in perfect order.

    • @dipsaccount8838
      @dipsaccount8838 Рік тому +12

      Perfectly said, me too turned into a believer, had gone thru an awakening!
      Everything is designed decorated and coded by a creator and the scope is ginormous! We are just the size of an ant and hence have limited sight and access!

    • @ChemysteryKids
      @ChemysteryKids Рік тому +7

      I’m so happy you found God. So many people are so stubborn and just don’t believe in God because they hate God. I’ve had some friends who you can tell they just don’t care. They don’t want proof they don’t wanna even talk about it they don’t wanna know the truth they just want to live their life how they want. It sucks and it’s sad because God loves you and wants you to come to him more than anything. God bless you!

    • @rizdekd3912
      @rizdekd3912 Рік тому +4

      But why did his method of transmitting hereditary also transmit a sinful nature? Was he unable to do better or did he want the sin nature to be passed down from the first humans that sinned?

    • @ChemysteryKids
      @ChemysteryKids Рік тому +7

      @@rizdekd3912 God gave you free will. That’s like saying “I wish my dad created me to never do bad things”.. the ultimate love is freedom of choice. Would you rather make your kids love you or give them the freedom to choose? You choose to love God by following Gods word and having faith in him in everything you do

    • @rizdekd3912
      @rizdekd3912 Рік тому

      @@ChemysteryKids This has nothing to do with free will. This has to do with God's method of hereditary passing down a sin nature cue to a corrupted creation. Obviously a 'sin nature' was not needed for someone to choose to sin as is evidence by Adam and Eve along with the angels in heaven rebelling. They managed to do that without an inherited sin nature.

  • @larrytate1657
    @larrytate1657 2 місяці тому +14

    Science gives me a greater appreciation of God.

    • @demolitionwilliams7419
      @demolitionwilliams7419 22 дні тому

      As it was designed to do!

    • @rizdekd3912
      @rizdekd3912 14 днів тому

      But would you appreciate if God had created and fine tuned the natural world such that it would produce life naturally that could evolve naturally into the diversity of life we see on earth?

  • @rkba4923
    @rkba4923 5 місяців тому +27

    Information/Instructions can only come from one source: intelligence. What source of intelligence wrote the genetic code? "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God."

  • @yvetteschneider5172
    @yvetteschneider5172 Рік тому +13

    Fascinating! Scientists are discovering what and how things are made, how things come about, work together, etc. by hypothesis, testing and finding an outcome to prove the reality of things yet some refuse to believe in the One Utmost Creator most people call God which made everything science wonders about and longs to know about and of all things beyond our ability to understand in existence. We are always looking for the answers of higher intelligence.

  • @r0flcopter
    @r0flcopter 3 місяці тому +2

    Thank you for this explanation.

  • @michaelgeorge4600
    @michaelgeorge4600 5 місяців тому +5

    PRAISE BE TO OUR AWESOME GOD!!!!!!!

  • @alonsoalcantar7847
    @alonsoalcantar7847 11 місяців тому +18

    I've always wondered if we are born from evolution, and at some point, we were a single piece of bacteria. How on earth did the minerals of earth with no soul, no form of thinking or knowledge, come together and magically formed themselves to become bacteria, and the complex structure of DNA. These same minerals also somehow invented the language of that DNA. As a Christian, it takes less faith to believe in God than evolution.

    • @guitart4909
      @guitart4909 11 місяців тому

      Chemical processes don’t require a soul to function though. Fire still burns, oxygen still causes rust. Most of the chemical reactions or mutations within DNA don’t yield an advantage, but when it does, we call it evolution. And evolution is very real. But it doesn’t answer why matter behaves the way it does. Or whether there is a being that assigns these properties to matter. But it’s not logical to invalidate a process by equating it to magic, while simultaneously believing in a magical entity or God. God has historically been a placeholder term to explain things we don’t yet understand. And it is much easier to believe God as a cause vs understanding quantum mechanics. But the easier understood premise isn’t necessarily the most accurate one. You can’t use the tools of the natural world (science) to prove or disprove the existence of a being that is outside the bounds and laws of the physical world (God).

    • @SatanFollower1
      @SatanFollower1 11 місяців тому

      It’s called abiogenesis stupid

    • @Woopor
      @Woopor 9 місяців тому +1

      Evolution does not try to answer that question, how did life first become a thing. However, with more deep sea discoveries we have more and more clues. Volcanic vents spew chemical soup into the oceans, making a perfect storm for proteins and eventually basic life to be created. Or maybe not. Maybe God made the first cell. Evolution doesn’t NEED an understanding of the origin of life to work, we can see it work, it does work, regardless of the missing pieces

    • @h.gonyaulax2190
      @h.gonyaulax2190 3 місяці тому +1

      Biochemistry is not built from minerals.

    • @chuckl4449
      @chuckl4449 2 місяці тому

      What are sodium, magnesium, potassium, etc...then?

  • @LRW-uh5he
    @LRW-uh5he 2 місяці тому

    Thank you for the nice surprise. Talking about language, did you know that the Hebrew word rendered soul is nephesh, נָפַשׁ which comes from the verb, naphash, which means 'to refresh'. All living things have a refresher. I think that refresher is a great descriptive term for DNA. Thus, Jesus told his disciples not to fear those who can kill the body but not the refresher, and that even the hairs of their heads were numbered ... Matthew 10:28-30. So God retains the information of your DNA / Refresher.

  • @jellyface401
    @jellyface401 2 місяці тому +1

    Why stop in genes? You can go on forever, but it always starts and ends with God!

  • @candiliniacity1490
    @candiliniacity1490 28 днів тому

    Today I thought about it.

  • @LRW-uh5he
    @LRW-uh5he 2 місяці тому

    The Hebrew term for the soul is refresher /nephesh, derived from the verb naphash 'to refresh'. This is the DNA. Thus, Jesus told his disciples not to fear those who can destroy the body but not the nephesh, adding that even the hairs of their head were numbered Mt 10:28-20

  • @Me2Lancer
    @Me2Lancer 2 місяці тому +1

    Thank you again for making a compelling case for the necessity of having a Creator God. I've been interested in Creation science since the early 1960s.

  • @user-gr3oo5ux9x
    @user-gr3oo5ux9x 19 днів тому

    Unreal dreamers in an unreal dream.all of humanity down the rabbit hole,does not exist

  • @JojoKanto-gw7ts
    @JojoKanto-gw7ts 8 місяців тому

    👍👍👍

  • @JontheBerean
    @JontheBerean 7 місяців тому +4

    ❤️✝️🙏

    • @JontheBerean
      @JontheBerean 7 місяців тому

      Why I believe in the Lord Jesus Christ :
      ua-cam.com/video/jIZ0--4ZurE/v-deo.html

  • @davidm4566
    @davidm4566 2 місяці тому

    DNA is software. It's computer code. But instead of digital, binary code, it's chemical, quad code.
    It's computer programming, but exponentially better than binary code with ones and zeroes.

    • @Penrodyn
      @Penrodyn 6 днів тому

      Except binary isn’t as error prone as DNA. DNA itself is not the key, it’s a passive lifeless molecule. It’s the proteins that are made from it that are important. It’s the proteins that look after the DNA, by replicating and translating the DNA sequence. Living organisms don’t work like our computers, they are more analog than digital.

  • @FranklinThe1
    @FranklinThe1 6 місяців тому +2

    As a Christian I would appreciate this video more if it addressed the lab studies done where microscopic organisms evolved through natural selection. There most definitely is a degree of evolution allowed by natural selection.

    • @davidm4566
      @davidm4566 2 місяці тому

      Maybe I can help. DNA is very malleable. We are given flexible genes that change over time.
      It's "evolution" as in change, but there are limitations of what DNA can do.
      Also, new info generally doesn't happen. Natural selection tends to be a reduction of existing code that ends up helping the population.
      Like, if a beetle loses the information for wings, and it somehow helps them survive better on some ecosystem, but it doesn't make the information for new, functional wings that didn't exist before.
      The biggest example is bacterial resistance to antibiotics.
      Antibiotics trigger cytolysis (it makes the cell disintegrate) in bacteria. When bacteria are immune to an antibiotic, it's because they had a mutation that didn't have the gene to melt when contacting antibiotics.
      So they didn't react in the normal way. When all the normal bacteria die off leaving the mutants, they reproduce leaving the population stronger.
      That's natural selection, but the bacteria didn't evolve into a super version, they just basically mutated to not have an allergy.
      So is that evolution? Yes, as in the population changed over time, but no, as in it didn't really become something new. The pollination just no longer has an allergy that the species used to.

    • @SaturnTheShiningOne
      @SaturnTheShiningOne Місяць тому

      They adapted, but through human interaction. And how much further can they adapt? The answer is only a small amount of adaptation before reverting back to single cell organisms. This is only achieved in lab studies not in natural conditions.

  • @mihaleben6051
    @mihaleben6051 Місяць тому

    Its acids.

  • @RobertSmith-gx3mi
    @RobertSmith-gx3mi 12 днів тому

    After science explained to Ken ham, what DNA is Ken And apologists like him then went on to assert well there's your proof of my god.
    They used to point at trees and mountains and assert that same kind of proof of their god and that's a problem for them.
    All they can do is point and assert.But they don't have any evidence linking any of the things they point to to a god

  • @user-bk9fk2tq2z
    @user-bk9fk2tq2z 5 місяців тому +4

    Rosalind Franklin helped them discover the structure of DNA.

    • @h.gonyaulax2190
      @h.gonyaulax2190 3 місяці тому

      They have gained unauthorized access to Rosalind Franklin's hard-won data. They had not contributed anything to the X-ray structure analysis.

    • @bicepticus4038
      @bicepticus4038 2 місяці тому

      @@h.gonyaulax2190 she actually willingly shared her data with Watson and Crick...

    • @h.gonyaulax2190
      @h.gonyaulax2190 2 місяці тому +1

      @@bicepticus4038 That is definitely wrong!
      She did not share the information because she wanted to be sure herself first. Only Maurice Wilkens, as head of the laboratory, received a copy of photo 51, which he “unfortunately” showed to Watson and Crick, who obtained their missing information from it. The hard work of analyzing the X-ray structure data was Franklin's achievement. Watson and Crick had contributed nothing, but nothing at all!

  • @RH-go4wi
    @RH-go4wi 7 місяців тому +5

    Its al lso simple there sure is a God, we mske it complex and I beleive we ..all humans do not have the minds the brains to understand or know god.

  • @jesusisjewish9674
    @jesusisjewish9674 10 місяців тому +7

    Very interesting Ken’s story about the evolutionist putting the 26 letters of the alphabet and randomly pulling them out, spelling a 3 letter word to “prove” evolution. It seems to me, the problem with this illustration seeking to prove evolution is this;
    the cells in all living things are made up of DNA. To put it in terms of letters, each strand of DVA is made up of nearly 3 billion letters that all have to be in exactly the right order. For evolution to be true, the evolutionist needs to pull not 3 letters, but 3 billion letters out of a hat, all in exactly the right order and all by random chance. This could not be done in a trillion years!
    The complexity of creation shows us there must be a creator.

    • @Woopor
      @Woopor 9 місяців тому +4

      But you’re wrong, see. Chemistry don’t have to pull all those 3 billion strands out of a hat, it only had to pull around 4000 molecules out of a hat, and it had hundreds of attempts, each yielding thousands of results from one pull. Once those 4000 letters finally WERE pulled, there was no more pulling letters from hats, since there was already a successful organism. And that successful organism reproduces, and its fittest offspring survive to reproduce more than its siblings, and their fittest offspring reproduce more than the weaker ones, and their environments naturally select the most fit organisms, which happen to be the ones with specific DNA that’s more complex. You seem to grossly misunderstand how long even just a million years is, which is more than ample time for ancient earth to create a primitive cell. And you also seem to forget that there were BILLIONS of years between that barely alive, simple cell and us

    • @digital1083
      @digital1083 8 місяців тому

      @@Woopor Ultimately though, science has still a hit a brick wall with the "Hard Problem of Consciousness".

    • @AsherManey
      @AsherManey 4 місяці тому

      ​@@Woopor Hey, did you know that DNA vital for life is only made of right-handed amino acids and that nature produces both right and left? This means that almost all of the amino acids that you're counting on making life are completely useless.
      Also, there are roughly 500 different kinds of amino acids and life as we know it uses only 20, so try making the 'perfect arrangement' of life given all of those hinderances.
      The point is, God made everything. Making evolution sound like a simple game of cards doesn't help make it any more realistic.

    • @awseko4732
      @awseko4732 4 місяці тому

      @@Woopor There are 0 examples of 2 celled organisms.

    • @user-ud9og6qm9h
      @user-ud9og6qm9h 3 місяці тому

      @@Wooporlife can’t come from non life but who cares about the LAW of biogenesis…….things tend to chaos and disorder but who cares about the 2nd LAW of thermodynamics
      Consciousness from unconsciousness? How? It just did ……
      Reason from non reason 🤷🏻‍♂️
      Time isn’t the friend to the evolutionist because more time with no guiding force equals more chaos and disorder. That’s science.

  • @wking7909
    @wking7909 2 місяці тому +1

    "I can't comprehend...therefore magic man in the sky." There is nothing wrong with not knowing everything just admit it and stop saying must be God.
    Everything that was unknown in the past-gravity, stars , eclipses, moon, sky, rain, earthquakes, desease, etc, etc.- was thought to be from gods!

    • @user-rb3zh6sz1b
      @user-rb3zh6sz1b Місяць тому

      Not talking about false gods but THE omniscient God the creator

  • @JJ-es3lv
    @JJ-es3lv 3 місяці тому

    I want this channel to go over the ancient Sumerian tablets. They predate the Christian Bible and has been translated to a god like being Enki created man in his image to be a slave race to mine gold for their planet. Talks about creating adamu in the garden of Eden. Would love to hear his thoughts on this.

  • @stevemiller8895
    @stevemiller8895 28 днів тому

    YHVH
    Y=10 = RESPONSIBILITY OR SOVEREIGNTY OR WILL OF MAN
    H=5 = THE GRACE OF GOD
    V=6 = THE NUMBER OF MAN
    H=5 = THE GRACE OF GOD
    = IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY / SOVEREIGNTY OR WILL OF MAN TO TESTIFY OF THE GRACE OF GOD
    (THIS IS THE NATURE OF SPERM COMING FROM THE TESTES TO TESTE - FY)

  • @antoinebguitar2869
    @antoinebguitar2869 7 місяців тому +2

    Bro we could discover a entire new mineral deep doen the earth or whatever and people would find bible verses that could describe it. URMOM 4:20: ..."And under the surface between what seperates the good and evil thy shiny shall be found within the ripples of it's mother". If i was God i would make so obvious u cannot doubt it, like sup creations of mine, here is the book of recipe how i create u and all the things around you, you just to arrangr this molecule in this specific order, use that or that law of physics, thats how i coded life. But idk so far he hasn't.

    • @yeetyeeterston6916
      @yeetyeeterston6916 6 місяців тому

      Before the word molecule exists? You should look at the Hebrew translation of the first word of the Bible in Genesis by John Costik. It literally spells out "His son will be destroyed by his own hand on the cross"

    • @yeetyeeterston6916
      @yeetyeeterston6916 6 місяців тому

      Before the word molecule exists? You should look at the Hebrew translation of the first word of the Bible in Genesis by John Costik. It literally spells out "His son will be destroyed by his own hand on the cross"

  • @imaw8ke
    @imaw8ke 7 місяців тому

    We did write the Bible on a rope with beads... It's called the rosary...

    • @davidm4566
      @davidm4566 2 місяці тому

      It does sound similar. I don't know much about the Rosary; isn't it a prayer and each bead represents something?
      You're right that it is a coded message! That is pretty cool.

    • @user-rb3zh6sz1b
      @user-rb3zh6sz1b Місяць тому

      No the rosary was created by the Catholic institution

  • @valentinogeorgievski
    @valentinogeorgievski 2 місяці тому +2

    Who cares why you remembered, get to the point without wasting peoples time...

  • @paulmuriithi9195
    @paulmuriithi9195 4 дні тому

    strawmanning people into convincing themselves that God exists is just pathetic. this is nonsense

  • @akmmonirulislam3961
    @akmmonirulislam3961 2 місяці тому +2

    You are correct but all life forms have DNA and it evolved in billions of years. DNAs are not created overnight. If you could go back 3.5 billion years, study how simple life evolved them complex lives evolved probably you understood the evolution.
    Creation does not take billion years, it just happens. But DNA you see today is a result of 3.5 billion years of evolution.
    We know very little does not mean we have to believe in miracles.
    Monirul Islam
    Dhaka, Bangladesh.
    09 May 2024

    • @davidm4566
      @davidm4566 2 місяці тому

      He's right, though that DNA is only information.
      If there was no God, then it would beg the question, How does information/instructions on how to build something develop at the same time as a process that can also read, understand, and process the information into real world things like muscle and cells?
      And where did the DNA information come from? Where did the building materials like atoms come from?
      And how is DNA made from the building blocks of protein, when DNA codes for protein? In other words, how are the original instructions for the material made from the same material it codes how to make?
      If we closely examine it objectively and honestly, none of it makes any logical sense to have developed by itself.

    • @marcj3682
      @marcj3682 Місяць тому

      "But DNA you see today is a result of 3.5 billion years of evolution. "
      PMSL.