Did You Know In ALL QUIET ON THE WESTERN FRONT…
Вставка
- Опубліковано 14 гру 2022
- You can see a bit of foreshadowing at the beginning. After the group of friends put on their uniforms, we see a shot where it tracks across them while they’re marching and singing with the rest of the soldiers. We actually see them in the order that they end up dying in the movie, starting with Ludwig, Kropp, Franz, and finally Paul. Technically, this will be the third rendition of the story, but it is considered to be more of a re-adaptation of the book instead of a remake of an older film. The script was completely based on the 1928 novel alone.
Subscribe: bit.ly/3RBsQ8S
Instagram: / imeugeneclark
#Shorts #MovieFacts #DidYouKnow - Розваги
The original movie’s extras were actually German veterans who served during WW1
Wasn't the first movie made in the early 30s?
What scene ?
@@inkubusarchitektde I read the book but I never saw the movies. How many movies did they make that were inspired by this book? There were maybe three different movies inspired by this book, right?
@@224dot0dot0dot10 yeah three including the 2022 version.
@@attilatasciko4817 all the German soldier extras in the movie
It is a truly great movie. Really a mix of emotions though.
SPOILER
It really hit me when the guy downright stabbed his own throat out. As well as Paul's last remaining "friend" being shot, being carried back to camp just to be told he's dead. Ending also hit me with the blonde teenager grabbing dog tags just to find the guy who saved his life 10 minutes before dead.
@@2A_ROCKS_ Yea.. I loved this movie so damn much, but it hit hard too. Great time spent though
As someone who read the book, I found Tjaden’s death scene to be a little over the top imo. Originally, Kropp took the hit to the leg and went to the infirmary. In fact, both Kropp and Paul were in the infirmary together. The treatment of wounded soldiers was just as awful as it was on the front. Sadly, the movie left this portion out of the movie. Besides that difference, other differences felt genuinely surprising and fresh.
Are u saying kat wasn’t Paul’s friend lol why did u put it in quotation marks
@@dallassucks130 Because I'm not sure what to call them, they were complete strangers at the start of the movie.
Just to let you know, those aren't dog tags, those are ID Discs. The difference is, with a disc you snap it in half, one half stays with the body to help with burial, the other went to official offices so they could notify the family. While a dog tag has two separate sheets that you do not have to snap in half.
I'm a German WW2 reenactor and also knowledgeable in WW1.
They went from happy looking kids to depressed and traumatized in a few blinks of an eye
Man I hope all those men are in a better place
That's war for you.
Reminds me of...
ua-cam.com/video/vK4gv11PTI8/v-deo.html
And to be able to capture all that as an actor...just wow!
called brainwashing
If you are willing to read subtitles this movie is incredible. I'm a huge history nerd especially World War 1 and 2 and always felt like there's a ton of movies about World War II but they never had any really good ones about World War 1. This one shows the sheer brutality of what soldiers go through mentally.
the 1970s version was way better. This version was good don’t get me wrong but terrible compared to the original book and previous movies. totally ditched the whole purpose of the story
To a certain degree, it makes one wonder if it's out of respect for the loss and brutality of that particular war.
It's sad when people who only know English don't wanna read English lol
I was literally just thinking about this, why indeed?
@@creator4413 movies with heroes sell well. Movies with sense less slaughter where all participants loose, not so much.
WWII saw heroic Defenders beat the odds and tactics that let a handful take key positions, and achieve a breakthrough. Happy ends. Machineguns reaping meat and artillery pounding pulp is not an ideal setting for a happy end. If you look into this war, there was almost never a real breakthrough. On some fronts 100km could be gained, and then a new line was dug
Also, the only ones really knocking someone out of the war militarily was Germany defeating Russia... Not a good story to sell, but maybe in a few years...
why wasnt this in theaters.....of all movies this should have been on the big screen.....freaking masterpiece
IT WASN'T?!?!
That'a a shame......
@@nadiahapsari3359 if it was it wasnt shown near me, it is a shame
It got a small theatre release in Germany. Just a few cinemas for a short period (I think one or two weeks) showed it.
It's an atrocity that this wasn't released theatrically.
It was shown here at our theaters
One thing I also noticed was that the main soundtrack's synth notes always played before something terrible happened.
Leitmotiv
I noticed that too! The notes played a lot towards the beginning when we already knew that they were about to go to battle, but towards the end when they thought they were going home and those notes played, I just knew that it wouldn’t actually be over.
Bum Baum bwump
i find the original more horrifying in a sort of realistic way. since the actors in the original were veterans of the great war.
I still maintain that the 1931 film is the best one, it was filmed with actual ww1 veterans as actors and staff. Nearly everyone in that film had either fought in the war, lost someone in the war. or lived through it. You can see it in their faces, the horror and cold emptiness of people whove seen the world lit on fire and the knowledge of how one day, it all ends, and the world just keeps turning.
Watched as a jr high class assignment.
Subtitles are best because you can listen to the language.
I've only seen the original film and it shook me to the core to this very day.
Well sometimes, it isn't really an adventage to be an english native. Other cultures can understand english but on the opposite, ithere are many perls you won't understand.
I wanted Kat and Paul to survive and live, but there was a good portion of the movie left so I had to absorb the hurtful truth that everyone would perish.
You should read the book, many outcomes have been changed ENTIRELY
Katherine and Paul
@@KristinaTurnerAquarius who?
@@nicholascecil6733 Kat is short for Katherine or Katrina
@@KristinaTurnerAquarius is it now? I had no idea there were females serving in combat roles on the front line in german infantry units. That is absolutely fascinating! I can't remember a Katherin or Katrina in the whole novel though, I read it cover to cover. Maybe my memory is poor though, what did her character do in the book/movie?? Idiot
I read the novel for university and I can’t even imagine the look I had on my face when I finished it in the library.
Indeed, I read the book two years ago, it was highly saddening at the end with Paul’s death, had me shedding tears.
Original movie was better, but God damn the filming in this is beautiful
This new one is a real good war movie, but nae the best adaptation of the book
@@owenwolfco.8344 agreed 👍
@@jacobcoughlin1328 got myself the german version of this book with extra commentary like they did with the newer edition of Mein Kampf.
@@inkubusarchitektde nice! Enjoy the read!
@@owenwolfco.8344 And not really historical accurate
It’s good man I just finished it like 5 minutes ago just stunning watch it
You make it seem like the new adoption was more true to the original book than the other film adoptions. It is not, the new adoption is very loosely based on the novel. It focusses on many other aspects like the peace negotiations which are not present in the book and it even takes place in a different timeframe of the war.
The script was about as similar to the book as Blade Runner. The All Quiet from the 1979s was the closest thing we have ever gotten to the novel. The only unique detail in this movie that stood out to me as being directly from the book was the dead body in the tree with its clothes blown off. Otherwise it was unrecognizable
This Netflix movie actually made me angry about how much they cut from the book and what they changed.
Thank you for this comment, it’s probably the worst adaptation of a book to movie I’ve ever seen.
Dude, it's like no matter which way I look Netflix is taking an L. It's like they and Amazon are trying to destroy fanbases.
Although it wasn't accurate to the book at all, it is still probably the greatest world war one film in the last 40 years.
@@nickbell4984 I feel like when this was first pitched it had nothing to do with the book but they decided to shoehorn it in to boast the hype
@@nickbell4984 it really isn't. It's just WW1 porn, and not good www1 porn.
aaaand it removed almost if not ALL of the things that were included in the book. It's a good film, but it's not an adaptation by a long shot.
as if there wasn't fucken LOADS of foreshadowing in the beginning that everyone was going to die.
I still say the 1979 version is the best rendition of the book on screen
Especially the death, it is indeed by far more accurate to me at least.
No, the 1930 version.
@@Based_Blue96
Paul's death in the '30 film: *ping*
Paul's death in the '79 film: *head blown off*
Hell no…. This newest one is insane
@@jamesjesse9773 those two deaths are by far the most accurate according to the book.
That movie was not based on the novel, it was based on "all WW1 movies and games ever"
Odd how they claim to be based on the book alone, but still have almost nothing in common with the source material. Still a solid movie though, preferred the 70’s version.
They based it on entirely the book, yet it was so very different from the book. It’s almost like film directors think they tell better stories than these authors. They don’t.
Pre emtive Not-an-original-thought
It's not that they think they tell the story better, it's that certain things just don't work for different mediums. For instance,, you can make a story more shocking in comic form because of the page turning aspect, and scenery more breathtaking in cinema because, though nothing is more vivid than imagination, having all of the details slowly crafted over a paragraph or two, just doesn't hit the same as seeing it with your own eyes.
With that in mind, sometimes you have to change details of the story to work with the medium you're using. If you take a good book and transcribe it directly to script you have a bad movie. And vice versa.
You can't look at the book and the movie as the same things, more like siblings. They are very similar and come from the same source material, but each have their own strengths.
EDIT: Also fuck your name. Killed my uncle.
@@keenanevans7888the previous two renditions all quiet in movie form barely cut anything from the book, and they were very, very good movies. The latest all quiet is a Hollywood version of ww1, not a movie version of all quiet
That really hit hard when you see your friends dying one by one...
Dawg after reading the book I don’t mean to criticize, but the movie is inaccurate. No tanks, the order of events is out of order, and they left out a bunch of stuff. The movie though was great. I personally think Netflix was going for a WW1 accurate movie rather than the novel. Sry
It’s a movie so
Yes, I think they had to add some stuff to keep a bit more interesting. Would be a bit more boring without the tanks destroying their trenches and such. It does fit the real life events pretty well though, so still great movie.
As someone who read the book, I found Tjaden’s death scene to be a little over the top imo. Originally, Kropp took the hit to the leg and went to the infirmary. In fact, both Kropp and Paul were in the infirmary together. The treatment of wounded soldiers was just as awful as it was on the front. Sadly, the movie left this portion out of the movie. Besides that difference, other differences felt genuinely surprising and fresh.
uhh, the thing is that its not even from the book, 88% of the movie is inaccurate and its bassicly a dissapointment for all historians.
@@Mrtoppat you aren't a historian, you're a guy who saw a couple UA-cam essays on some stuff. It's mostly historically accurate. Maybe you mean the plot isn't the same as the original?
Another WW1 novel: _Johnny Got His Gun_ rough reading!!
considering the book, this "thing" is more of a complete work of fiction with some loose elements taken from the story and history in general...
Funfact: if you ever wanted to find the song they’re singing it’s
“Morgan marschieren wir” It’s super good, I recommend it.
Franz's death scene was never shown, the last scene we saw Franz the French tank pass by them, Paul and Franz gets separated to the group, there some theory Franz becomes a POW, stayed in the French trenches and got burned, missing in action
i lowkey think they just forgot about him lol
It was based on the novel yet it was completely different the veteran says he didn't face any resistance on the french trenches because the french had already retreated
Such a good book. The ending was sad
Nice work! Thank you 😊
Nothing like the book
All of their passings were heartbreakingly tragic.
They fucking butchered the novel.
I mean, at least they kept a few things in line. I’m more shocked at seeing that literally no one in the comment section seem to have even bothered to pick up and skim the model at least or do research on it.
Franz is the only One that doesn't die
Foreshadowing in the book are a pair of airmans boots.
The movie was not based on the book because of the amount criticism it got it was more so inspired by the book instead. I gotta say I did enjoy the movie and shows the terror of how WW1 was allegedly.
hell yea, i read all quiet on the western front in 8th grade, i can’t remember much of it but i’m hoping this movie will spark some memories
Himmlestosss and the school master were major characters with lots of dialogue.
Truly on of the movies of all time
That's strange, because this was the version that was the least closest to the book. There's only a few scenes it had the others didn't, most likely because we finally had the tech to more accurately portray them.
It adapts some points from the book but is not as faithful as the movies before it. Tjaden doesn't even die in the book, he's actually the sole survivor and becomes one of the characters in the sequel.
I would highly recommend anyone to read the book. The movie is amazing as well and does a good job with its rendition. However there were parts in the book that I would have liked to see in the movie
A lot of smart people working on this film. No wonder it was a masterpiece.
My grandfather, who died before I was born, was a French soldier in WW1 captured by the Germans. He escaped from a prison camp, stole a bull from a German farm, and walked the bull across Germany to Switzerland.
How did franz died
I'm pretty sure Franz died off screen. And the scene where Tjaden gives Franz's scarf makes it more believable. So Tjaden must've seen Franz's corpse and took his scarf.
He committed suicide in front of Paul and Stanislaus through a fork.
@@user-hx4nf1ni8lthat was tjaden
It's also far and away the worst story of the three. The book is the best as it's unparalleled in its scenery and description
The old movie was better because of the way it stuck with the books methods.
This one is still very good but it lost a part of the magic that made the book so horrifying. In this they seemed like cowards or mislead young men. But in the books they seemed brave but broken or breaking. It's hard to explain if you liked this though I encourage you to read the book
Even though I really liked this movie I agree the book is better (can't speak for the 1930 version because I haven't seen it), and I agree with most of the rest of this comment but I disagree with the "in this they seemed like cowards or misled young men but in the books they seemed brave but broken or breaking" bit. I don't think the movie portrayed them as cowards. Sometimes they seemed like scared boys, which they were, and maybe in the book it was made clearer that they "went courageously into every action" and "were no mutineers, no deserters, no cowards" (quotes from the book), but I don't think they were cowards in the movie. I also think that in the book they were also misled young men in many ways, and that being tricked into voulenteering to go to a hell hole by a society and authority figures that glorified it was a big point the original story made.
Anyway, that's my opinion, one of the great things about art is people can see it differently.
(I haven't read the book) i definitely got the mislead young men angle but it don't see the coward part. What do you mean there?
I hope it wins an Oscar
It won bro.
However they did add scene that wasnt present in the Novel, the Signing of the Armisitice in 1918
i love when movies go completely the route of the book. i wish jurassic park did that
I have a hard time following what character is what in war movies since they all wear the same clothes and I suck at names, so I never recognized or remembered the second and third guy
We don't see Franz die though he is just separated from Paul
Tjaden confirms it after he retrieves the scarf Franz got from that French woman
@@Jeffsucks Oh yes I remember thanks
Ludwig: face blown off and leg
Albert: well done maybe a little overcooked
Franz:?
Paul: shanked
Franz got forked
@@lastofthe4horsemen279 That was a completely different person. Franz doesn't die but leaves the army. In the book franz dies thats why i've seen like 3 shorts say that he died because none of them watched it and chat gpt made it for them and chat gpt only knows the book because it's such a recent movie.
@@justintrouble8 oh my bad always ment to read the book ln the new film who commited suicde with a fork after the last big battle?
@@lastofthe4horsemen279 Tjaden, the hardened soldier you meet inside the the bunker thats being shelled when they first enter the war, hes talking about how the enemy is doing a creeping charge, probably the best soldier in their platoon. I can see how you thought that was franz as he franz dies slowly on a hospital bed like tjaden was going to do, in the books,
I just watched this movie, and it truly was a great.
The movie is full of foreshadowing
Most brutal and real war movie long time no rambo heroes
Except there was no little boy and of course no tanks
This was a masterpiece movie in my books
I prefer the 1930's film but Goddamn that scene with the tanks was just built different. Most war movies treat tanks as this big "OH SHIT" moment and rightfully so. But I've yet to see something portray the sheer horror and dread that soldiers must've felt facing those iron behemoths for the first time in history.
These mobile castles armed with cannons and mg's, something so foreign and unfathomable back in those days, just barreling across the battlefield towards you turning men and barricades alike into dust. Your average weapons have little to no effect. That's pure nightmare stuff.
This movie isn’t exactly accurate to the novel and earlier movies. Some of the original classmates aren’t there, a couple of the names are changed, and, in the novel and earlier movies, Paul is wounded and gets to go home for a while. Also, I don’t think Albert dies in the originals. However, all of the movies are great.
What if it was based on it he sure was held in the follow it
Truly a great book and a great movie to represent exactly what the book was trying to convey
Not at all.
What a film man …
The military today is very different The attacks take place at a greater distance with nuclear etc today and armies are highly trained professionals WW1 had young conscripts used as cannon fodder basically Fewer civilian casualties than ww2 and today
War never changes
during the Falkland War the British thougt the same..and ending to be forced to use WWI storming tactics...
@@petrophaga8523 The Falklands war was over 40 years ago, far different than any war today. Best example would be the Russo-Ukrainian war, or the Skirmishes in Syria or Afghanistan. Mostly artillery battles or long range shooting with the help of loitering munitions.
Lmao
@@DrSabot-A the Russo-Ukraine War is more similar to WWI on the western front and the late WWII eastern front that were both for the most part pretty static wars that relied heavily on numbers and resources advantages whilst technology and veterancy play far less of a role. Afghanistan and Syria also are not conventional interstate wars at all. The Falklands war is only different from the Russo-Ukrainian war because the British had naval and air superiority on top of land based veterancy and technological superiority.
Hm there's a third version of this movie out? Gotta see it then
I'm going to have my son's read the book and watch the movie when they become teenagers. I want them to stay out of the military
World War 1 was very do from modern combat you do know that. I can speak from experience.
@Brado Man War is hell, regardless of the century.
Well, not every job in the military is combat. Hell they could even be stationed in your home country depending on what job they get
@@skibur848 It's all taking part in barbarism
This movie went right over the head of these repliers…
In the book, when Paul is carrying Kat. They get caught in a artillery barrage and Kat is killed instantly when a piece of shrapnel hits him in the head, but Paul was carrying him and didn’t know it, so he carried his dead comrade all the way back to his HQ. The worst part is that Paul talking to his dead friend thinking he was alive.
6:57 this is what people should be listening to when they complain about inaccuracies.
It was good. It was horrible and visceral but good.
This movie is amazing
great movie
A great film but a poor adaptation of the book.
Because it's a retelling and not an adaptation, they made that clear when they were making it.
Who cares, not every film adaptation has to be a perfect copy of the book
I liked it but the old ones hit way harder
No, the script was not alone based on the novel. I read the novel. This movie sucked in my opinion.
The title is misleading, I think.
The original German title _Im Westen Nichts Neues_ literally translates to _Nothing New At The Western Front_ which doesn't mean that nothing is happening but rather that at the western front, all the slaughtering barely changes anything about the front line.
Thank you for spoiling it for me. I appreciate it.
So the dialogue of the main characters Is the same as the novel. However thay add other characters and other lines. And also I don't remember there being a tank assault in the book
When was this movie made and where can I watch it?
It's on Netflix brotha
Like1917 DVD I have classic all quiet on the western front sad those soldiers would die Ludwig kroff franz and paul
Based on the 1928 novel my ass. A lot of scenes from the book were outright removed nor mentioned. Paul never went home, paul never saw the Russians, and we never saw Haie Westhus or Himmelstoß.
It wasn't as faithful to the source as the first two films.
Did you know they all died gruesome deaths?
Funny enough, he's stated there are three movies, however they are all drastically different funny enough, one from 1936 starring actual German veterans, one from 1979, and this one, from 2022 (?).
I know it's just a movie but man the main characters have THE most punchable faces of all time at the beginning when they are all happy thinking war will be fun and games
I was in the middle of the book...
The only quiet on the Western front I know is the one from 1930
Did you know: the novel was banned in Germany after the nazi party took power.
Yes, largely because it’s was an anti-war film and the NSDAP(Nazi’s) viewed WWI as a common national struggle, and with a nationalist POV. Another thing is because the novel was written by a Jew, in which the entire right-wing political sect of post-war Germany, including not only the NSDAP, but the DNVP(a mixed coalition of Monarchist, Right-Wing Populists, Nationalists, and Conservatives), DVP(Big Business Conservatives) and the BVP(Pro-Monarchy Bavarian Regionalists) blamed the “loss” of WWI and Versailles on the Jews, and consequently they didn’t view WWI as a loss at all.
@@Based_Blue96 yes very interesting read after founding out. A great book I recommend that can help picture nazi Germany before the war is called “travellers through the reich” good thought provoker
that movie was write by the real soldier and the director js copyed the story that happened to the soldiers
context in the movie: we start with a 17-18yr and they surved there country that is Germany and the first one to go is Ludwig and next kropp and tye last 4 and the first one to go in that pack of 4 is I think Franc and Jäden next Paul Baümer best friend kat and the last to die is Pual Baümer and ty guys for listening and js ty
Foreshadowing?
I don't think he seen how they got their uniforms in the first place. Sort of doesn't bode well for the next wave of cannon-fodder.
And yet it’s the farthest adaptation to the book, they completely rewrote Paul’s character and death scene
The problem with the original movie is the actors and directors were too close to the silent film era and acted like it.
I personally enjoyed the 1979 one more than the new remake
Does Franz actually die? All I remember was that some other German soldier took him away during that tank scene.
SPOILER FROM THE BOOK In the book if i recall correctly Franz dies in a hospital in the beginning of the story
@@gobytoby123 damn, thought at least one of would survive. 😔
I saw it ready two times = one of the best movie all the time of 1.W.W. !
Both this and the original are great pieces but something about the original is just…different a good different
I just want to point this out to people: all these "did you know" channels just scoop the facts right off the IMDB trivia sections. Save yourselves some time and just read those
No one reads anymore. They just watch pointless shit in video format. They do the same shit on Wikipedia articles as well.
What was that march song called
"The script was completely based on the 1928 novel alone."
...well that was a lie. Not that it was based on the other two, but it sure wasn't based on the novel.
I’d hesitate to claim that the movie was based on the novel alone, seeing as the movie shuffles the plot like a deck of cards and removed more than one major scene.
It has very little resemblance to the original story, and honestly the ending missed the entire point of the book in the first place.
That’s completely untrue the movie has nothing to do with the book, the only resemblance they share is the title, characters names, and a few quotes.
Franz doesn't die in the 2022 film, he only dies in book. He infact does the smart thing and leaves the german army to join 3 lovely ladies. Remember that chat gpt doesn't know anything about the movie because it was so recent, this person obviously used chat gpt to make his script and never saw the movie.
I'd be ashamed to be so lazy considering all he had to do was watch a 2 hour fantastic movie to acctually make the video and the dude probably makes 1000s of dollars for every short he releases, imagine not being able to watch a great movie for a 500 dollars an hour. Bring back the guillotines.