WRONG!!! We British are NOT IN ANY WAY involved in the trouble-struck German/French/Spanish project and even under this vile government or a still worse Labour one, hopefully we NEVER WILL be. Not least as it would then also become an open invitation to the loathsome EU institution to meddle still more in our affairs. As things are now, we have two excellent partners in Japan and Italy, and re this arrgt too, we should ensure NO additional access is dfforded to France or Germany.
you may be a dreamer. Japan may be a good partner, but dealing with a right-wing nationalist and unpredictable Italian side will be real fun. You also believe that we still have the strength to handle such a project. We have maybe a handful of companies that are technically world-class. The rest are sub-par and we'll be disillusioned and really hit with soaring costs on the project. The gap between aspiration and reality in our country is widening. We can't even manage to fill the shelves in our supermarkets, equip our NHS properly and pay our nurses correctly..... but we are independent now and see the benefits at every turn.... We are going to fall flat on our own asses
@@gerhardma4687 Drivelling fact-free twaddle from obvious dogma-infarcted zealots bores me rigid, I'm afraid, so shoo and sermonise someone as deluded as yourself
@@gerhardma4687 Italian companies make some very good quality tech and machinery in general. The ploitical issue is the same with many countries. germany has sat on the fence militarily wise for decades as has the french in relation to it's NATO membership in spending 2% of GDP on it's armed forces. In fact only a handful of NATO members have invested in their military including the US,UK,Greece and Slovakia or Slovenia. The rest have failed to live up to their obligations so my point is doesn't matter what group/club a nation belongs to if there is no politcial will to invest. Regarding shelves being filled, totally agree and as usual it's because our politicians can't think more than 5yrs ahead. You mention nurses pay, I have family members who work in the NHS, Paramedic practitioners etc and they do deserve a pay rise however the idea that they rely on food baks and are paid badly is laughable. Firstly nurses are on average paid £34k pa for a contracted week of 36hrs a week made up of 3 x 12hr shifts for 3 weeks of a month and 4 shifts of 12hrs for the 4th week of a month. Bascially they are contracted to work 3 days a week and anything more than those 3 days a week (4 days on the 4th week) they receive 1.5x pay. Add to that their pensions which anyone in the private sector would bite your hand of for and the discounts they receive in many shops due to working for the NHS and overall it's a well paid job.Yes they should get a payrise, yes in general they work hard in a stressful job but the idea that they are low paid which many particularly on the Left claim is bullcrap. The NHS Budget receives around £170 billion (£170 thousand million each year) , the problem is the NHS is managed very poorly, still as we speak advertising for "Diversity managers on £60k a year" and "wellness in work managers on £70K a year"). Cut the crap and diversity bollox and use the money to pay nurses more money.Only 45.7% of the UK population are net contributors to the system, 54.3% are net recipients so get out more than they contribute, is that even remotely sustainable?. Add to that the fact that only 10% of NHS Prescriptions are paid for, 90% are "free". You did bring up the Nurses and NHS. Apart from that I can agree with you. 🙂
@@AdrianSams Well said Adrian, you’ve stated facts that are nor well known. It’s the top administration and poor control of top consultants that really needs addressing. We need to introduce more efficiency and far less bureaucracy at the top. Look at German and French hospital methods, they are far more efficient and responsive.
The UK was the tech nation well into the 20th Century . The US was considered a backward nation until under the Churchill Roosevelt agreement Britain handed over all its intellectual property to the US , from jet engines to the work on the Bomb to get the US to enter the war on our side in 1942 . The US was safe as Britain had stopped the NAZI progress westwards to the US . I have US aircraft design books from 1942 to prove that the country fell way short in aircraft development . Their best offering for a fighter was the P40 , which was suitable for ground attack only , not an air superiority fighter like the Spitfire or Hurricane . Radial engines and one under powered Allison V12 was their tech which had barely advanced since WW1 . Even the British company Austin of America (Bantam ) won the GP vehicle contest at Aberdeen Proving Ground with the Bantam Reconnaissance Car 40 , but naturally in the normal fashion gave the contract to Ford and Willy's . The Americans made sure that after the war in Europe as many items and people of technical achievement as possible were taken to the US .But later the British won the new NATO intermediate rifle and cartridge competition with the EM2 at the same place in 1957 , but true to form , the contract to build was given away to Winchester ( the 308 Win not being an intermediate cartridge at all which was out performed by the 280 British or 7 mm NATO ) with other companies getting the battle rifle . Some 60 years later realising that 7 mm was the way to go after all ! A nation that truly cuts of its nose to spite the face . Our intellectual property gave the US a massive post war boost in tech and their physical size did the rest ,while we rebuilt our shattered nation . From 1945 £1 = $4 , in the 70s £1= $2 , and now £1 = $ 1.30 or thereabouts . This is an example of our " special relationship '. BAE Systems and British Aerospace was one and the same , not separate . Get it right . BAE was formed in 1997 from many large British multinationals like Marconi , De Havilland , Hawker etc ., when Boeing McDonald Douglas combined and after the formation of Lockheed Martin . We designed and built Concorde which made the Americans cry and then banned it from their airspace . Boeing tried to build the 7207 supersonic airliner which failed miserably . We gave the Americans VTOL in the form of the Harrier GR8 for the USMC as they could not design such an aircraft nor could our Russian friends but at least they managed to get an example airborne . BAE has major input in the JSF and most other major projects and has interests in Airbus and several other European tech companies . The US B52 fleet has Rolls Royce engines , and try as they might Britain still holds the Land Speed Record with the SSC and is currently retraining US ' Top Gun ' pilots at the Mach Loop in Wales . BAE Systems has operations in Japan , Australia and North America . The interest in the UK variant Typhoon is continuing with Spain being the latest to buy a fleet . In other aspects the US has low tech NASCAR and Indycar , Britain hosts and develops high tech Formula 1 . Indias next carrier is likely to be British after the impressive QE class . The BAE Astute class submarine a world beater in tech and weapons but will not be on sale . What better company and country do you expect the best to be built ?
Only one thing wrong. Russia did build a vertical take off yak. The technology for which the US bought and used in the F35. It seems to be a lot better than the Harrier system which was complicated to operate. Britains biggest problem has always been it’s bought and paid for politicians. Look at TSR 2, it was ready to rock, they had hoped they could give it a fail but it was excellent ….and yet still they canned it! This of course allowed the US to grab even more designers from us. The politicians grab failure from the jaws of victory every time.
You were the leading tech nation until WWII ended. After which, you jettisoned Churchill and embraced socialism and all its ills. We saved your bacon with equipment and manpower. Your .303 in the Spitfire (early models) was no competition compared to the Browning .50 cal. Get over yourself, you lost two to us and we saved Europe twice.
The BAE Systems Tempest is a proposed sixth-generation fighter aircraft that is under development in the United Kingdom for the Royal Air Force (RAF). The aircraft is intended to enter service from 2035, gradually replacing the Eurofighter Typhoon. It is being developed as part of the Future Combat Air System (FCAS) programme by a consortium known as "Team Tempest", which includes the Ministry of Defence, BAE Systems, Rolls-Royce, Leonardo, and MBDA UK. £2 billion is planned to be spent by the British government on the initial phase of the project up to 2025.
italian eletronica too dont forghet that uk and italy had an history of collaboration into aircraft building ( tornado 4.5 generation that it only under f 22 maby at long distance)
The UK's 6th Gen fighter has no reason not to succeed: both the UK and Japan have the technological know-how to build advanced fighter jets; Italy too is a major European country that has big industrial companies that build advanced military hardware. The three together have the economic capacity and sizable military budgets to produce the Tempest.
@@roundtheloopandback Japan alone could fund this project. UK, Italy and Japan combined will not struggle to finance this. Political will is what concerns me more.
Just a update. Every part of the aircraft has now been practically tested and passed with flying colours... completely removing any doubt of engineering at this stage. Also to correct the video... The Tempest is not to "replace the Eurofighter"... it's officially listed as "To complement and then replace Eurofighters AND F-35's"... And being the Royal Airforce is very open about preferring the Eurofighter over the F-35 in every single department... there is obviously plans to already remove the F-35 fleet and maybe even the carriers in the foreseeable future. To me it looks a bit like a cross between a Eurofighter and a F-22... and it's sad that more European nations did not jump on board.
Amazing when you consider it was us Brits who invented the Hovercraft, Landing systems for aircraft on carriers, Aircraft carriers, Tanks and much more. Today we don't invest in our young people and will pay a price long term but today we still contribute a fair amount.
Exactly what we did in the 60s with TSR2. The yanks couldn't get that project closed fast enough because if rolled out, it would've made their whole airforce obsolete.
Britain is learning a hard lesson, don't really on EU Nations as partner's, don't really on USA as partner's, do what has always worked best, do what serves Britain best. Tempest is our hope to be our own inovator's again, with the help of Italy and Japan, and any others who want to join. Look at how America gloats at the demise of the British aviation industry, and they are supposed to be our closest allies. Aviation should always be pushing forward, our friends should be our allies, let America leave us alone and let us build what we see as the future. We were at the cutting edge but we allowed others to take the lead. We are coming back, others may thank us one day, because what is left if we are gone, isn't always what is right.
Considering the British have been at the forefront of Aviation since jet powered flight, they have a lot to offer in the area of speed and AI. Come to think of it the good ole brits have invented quite a few things now taken for granted. The Internet, Computer, Television, V.T.O. Tanks, Aircraft carriers. etc etc. The U.S. don't like to be second best at anything.
Reality is that when the brits succeed it's quality - but obviously a lot of projects also don't make it or get screwed over by governments and whitehall. Being clear of the Germans and French and paired up with the Japanese and Italians bodes well as well. A lot of know how and multi national experience. I would speculate that a successful tempest will be the best 6th gen fighter currently in development - hopefully it progresses well enough to be exported as well.
The Brits just built 2 state of the art Aircraft carriers, im confident they will have no problem building aircraft with the Japanese, they have been a major contributor to the F35 JSF production aswell as the Eurofighter before that an so on all the way back to when the Brits Invented the Jet engine.. oh and they invented the Aircraft carrier too now I think of it.. damn poms :)
It a good project the Japanese have a lot to add to this project they have done 4.5+ aircraft as well. Also they are very nifty with a silicon chip. It's a better foundation than eurofighter. So hopefully won't be nearly obsolete when entering service.
I don't think the uk will be able to do this by ourselves, BUT with assistance from any or all of italy , spain, sweeden and maybe in the long run a non-european partner like India.
Yes I think,the British if not stalled at all by the government,along with the Italians and the Japanese who are very good nations who build very good advanced stuff, could build a very good advanced 6 th generation fighter jet.the British were the first nation to build the harrier, VTOL jet,a class jet the first of its kind, and don't forget a lot of other things the old UK has built over the years, along with Italy and Japan,the trouble with the old USA without offense is they don't like to be out matched at anything these days.i respect the US for helping us in our time's of need, and sharing their technology with us and the rest of the world, but they can't be the best all the time.
I cant imagine France Germany and Spain working together cohesively - the UK Japan and Italy are more likely to have a 6Gen Fighter , the main issue with Europe is they dont have their own global satellite system , this needs to change
@@onlymeok The system is intended primarily for civilian use, unlike the more military-oriented systems of the United States (GPS), Russia (GLONASS) and China (BeiDou). The European system will only be subject to shutdown for military purposes in extreme circumstances (such as an armed conflict)
Uk and japan working cohesively...then the emotional, though solid engineering, of the Italians. Btw...worked with Japanese and for an Italian firm. Never working for an Italian firm again....too emotionaly draining.
@@chrisjones7236 My father worked on several projects for Ferranti Systems in the early 90's. He said the management structure drove him mad. The engineers were top notch but everyone in charge was hyper emotional and over sensitive to critisism which became personal and slowed progress to a standstill. He managed just 4 years with them before walking out.
@@onlymeok galileo is italian sistem plese, half of spase station was built in italy and nasa for his new moom travel and colonization is joint wit alenia aerospace italy of corse
Its UK… Sweden and Italy! Where do your information come from? It seems to be very wrong, this is the 2nd false information in a short time… the GLSDB video, its a joint effort between Boeing and Saab , and the most modern gear must be the Archer artillery system.🙄
@@001Jonno do you remenber by who has built tornado and ef2000? and where is assembled and rapair american f 35 an other american plane ? in Cameriry thae first in venice officine aeronavali the second .
@@lucianorosarelli-xr5lr A four, later three, nation consortium called Panavia built the Tornado. The Eurofighter is built by a four nation consortium, which I think is just called Eurofighter. Many Brits will argue that British Aerospace primarily designed both, but that's up for discussion. Assembly of the F-35 is done at three sites: off the top of my head, I think they're Fort Worth Texas, Cameri near Milan, and somewhere near Tokyo. I haven't heard of anything about Venice.
The question is not weather the Europeans are capable of building a cutting edge technologically advanced 6th generation fighter, but how soon, in what numbers, and how effective it will be against the adversary's capabilities in the future.
Finalmente um pouco de personalidade propria na Europa, coisa que só a Inglaterra mostrava, aprovo a ideia de terem suas proprias forças armadas e defesas, de qualquer forma são aliados dos EUA, também os britanicos estão certos, nada de um exercito unico, isso é besteira e a variedade é melhor, basta serem aliados.
I dont know why they are even bothering with the manned version. Adding the man limits the specs and adds a ton of weight and tech needs. I suppose the issue for the Europeans is the lack of satellites for long range control - they would have a limited area of operation unless they access our military satellite network.
@@gryph01 not more than Jaguar, Land Rover, Austin, MG, should I go on. I have experienced all of them in my life time. Ps. I am a South African, do not know what Harleys have to do with me?
A Harley is an American motorbike. 😂 You are confused, are you talking about an Austin-Healy, a classic 50s sports car whose scroll seal would leak after a long time. One classic old car that's worth >$50000 now! Modern cars do not leak, I own a jaguar F-type that does not leak oil. Theres plenty of american cars that have a lot of stock faults, you are using a poor generalization! British engineering such as Rolls Royce lead the world, you only have to look at Jet engines used on modern Aircraft. The US B52 bomber is just getting an upgrade to RR engines! Oh! dear, british engines on your Nucleasr bomber force! And just for interest about leaks the US Lockheed SR71 used to leak fuel all over the runway before takeoff because of it's high speed the design had loose fitting panels and this affected the fuel tanks!
It has SFA to do with NATO. It is an all British aircraft! Japan and Saab have been brought in pst design as partners who will build and use the jet and last time I looked, Japan was not in bloody NATO, a now useless EuSSR body
In the coming years it sounds like the NATO Alliance will still be strong but without a dominant partner (i.e. the United States). This conflict in the Ukraine has made Europe nervous enough and has shown their vulnerabilities such as being dependent upon an aggressive and unpredictable neighbor; Russia. I think that the one country poised to become the dominant power in Europe is France. Access to the sea both north and south as well as promoting energy independence through such so-called controversial energy sources (nuclear) and large areas of food producing land will make France able to make its own way in the world while still keeping a foot in the door with NATO.
The USA Will remain the dominate power in NATO for the simple fact the we pay 90% of NATOs bills. Once we get ride of this demented old fool of a President (the worst in the history of America) The USA will continue to dominate. We learned the lesson of WW2. It’s not what is ON the surface of the ocean, it’s what lurks Below that is the power of the USA all 65 of them. Not one ship of an enemy would survive the first week of a conflict. As proved in the Ukraine war, the might of the USAF would dominate in one day, no one has even a hint of the stealth attack and complete destruction of a countries infrastructure if the USA enters a war without restrictions. Why do you think we just announced the B-21 Raider which has a radar signature of a fly. As with the F-117, still in service, the Aurora sixth generation fighter is already flying, they just haven’t told you about it. France, 1 Aircraft Carrier, USA 13 Carrier Groups.
@JamesJ30t Germany couldn't field a fully staffed and equipped brigade. They have been happy to let the USA handle that for them. France, while better off, doesn't have the will or the capability. NATO without the USA is nothing.
@@ruger3268 -- From what I have heard Germany has made significant increases to their milatary budget. Also at 3.85 trillion they have highest GDP of any western European nation.,
Scandalously left the EU? WTF do you think you are? I'd worry about the decline of the USA before I comment on what the people of the UK have decided to do.
when we are left to our own devices, and not hamstrung politically, we are some of the finest innovators on the planet. unfortunately our politicians are usually bought by foreign powers ands we get their substandard shite.
@@MegaGeorge1948 Listen, you Americans think you created everything, you think nobody else has the sophistication or intelligence to pioneer their own designs. We were the first nation to have most of things your military takes for granted (some of your military equipment IS British lol), if anything YOU imitate US! So excuse me for calling you nanes, but if you look it up its perfectly apt.
Yeah lets not forget American companies are notorious for bribery and corruption when it comes to obtaining contracts and have been sanctioned more than once so one of them sticking their oar in and scuttling the project wouldn't be the first time. Do I think it will come to be I think it is possible but only time will tell. As far as the multinational European fighter goes there is a bit of a history of too many cooks and it wouldn't be the first time someone took their bat a ball and went home. If I had to guess about 6th gen fighter say US definitely, Japan probably and UK and Europe Maybe.
China has led in unlimited battery energy! They are already known the technology of 3D printed ceramic impeller and metal to form a large-volume heterogeneous bearing turbine. Your video is common and nothing special
A divided europe is what america like. This is a good project but wont work. If you already have alternatives you wont find great motivation to do it. British used to be an innovative nation but they lost it since they became dependant to us.
I wish you used a more prominent headed photo , instead of some Aircraft that doesn’t even exist,, it’s nice to get the latest on developments of this new platform, but plz in future keep it real 👍
The last fully UK developed military jet was indeed the awesome VTOL/STOL Harrier and the US still uses them.
The video owner forgot to mention that haha
No it wasn't, it was the Typhoon....
@@jimmoynahan9910 The typhoon was a collaborative effort by several nations, so not fully UK developed :)
Amazing military tech 👍🏾
WRONG!!! We British are NOT IN ANY WAY involved in the trouble-struck German/French/Spanish project and even under this vile government or a still worse Labour one, hopefully we NEVER WILL be. Not least as it would then also become an open invitation to the loathsome EU institution to meddle still more in our affairs.
As things are now, we have two excellent partners in Japan and Italy, and re this arrgt too, we should ensure NO additional access is dfforded to France or Germany.
you may be a dreamer. Japan may be a good partner, but dealing with a right-wing nationalist and unpredictable Italian side will be real fun. You also believe that we still have the strength to handle such a project. We have maybe a handful of companies that are technically world-class. The rest are sub-par and we'll be disillusioned and really hit with soaring costs on the project. The gap between aspiration and reality in our country is widening. We can't even manage to fill the shelves in our supermarkets, equip our NHS properly and pay our nurses correctly..... but we are independent now and see the benefits at every turn.... We are going to fall flat on our own asses
@@gerhardma4687 Drivelling fact-free twaddle from obvious dogma-infarcted zealots bores me rigid, I'm afraid, so shoo and sermonise someone as deluded as yourself
@@gerhardma4687 Italian companies make some very good quality tech and machinery in general. The ploitical issue is the same with many countries. germany has sat on the fence militarily wise for decades as has the french in relation to it's NATO membership in spending 2% of GDP on it's armed forces. In fact only a handful of NATO members have invested in their military including the US,UK,Greece and Slovakia or Slovenia. The rest have failed to live up to their obligations so my point is doesn't matter what group/club a nation belongs to if there is no politcial will to invest. Regarding shelves being filled, totally agree and as usual it's because our politicians can't think more than 5yrs ahead. You mention nurses pay, I have family members who work in the NHS, Paramedic practitioners etc and they do deserve a pay rise however the idea that they rely on food baks and are paid badly is laughable.
Firstly nurses are on average paid £34k pa for a contracted week of 36hrs a week made up of 3 x 12hr shifts for 3 weeks of a month and 4 shifts of 12hrs for the 4th week of a month. Bascially they are contracted to work 3 days a week and anything more than those 3 days a week (4 days on the 4th week) they receive 1.5x pay. Add to that their pensions which anyone in the private sector would bite your hand of for and the discounts they receive in many shops due to working for the NHS and overall it's a well paid job.Yes they should get a payrise, yes in general they work hard in a stressful job but the idea that they are low paid which many particularly on the Left claim is bullcrap. The NHS Budget receives around £170 billion (£170 thousand million each year) , the problem is the NHS is managed very poorly, still as we speak advertising for "Diversity managers on £60k a year" and "wellness in work managers on £70K a year"). Cut the crap and diversity bollox and use the money to pay nurses more money.Only 45.7% of the UK population are net contributors to the system, 54.3% are net recipients so get out more than they contribute, is that even remotely sustainable?. Add to that the fact that only 10% of NHS Prescriptions are paid for, 90% are "free". You did bring up the Nurses and NHS.
Apart from that I can agree with you. 🙂
Lulz, calm down brainwashed kid:D
@@AdrianSams Well said Adrian, you’ve stated facts that are nor well known. It’s the top administration and poor control of top consultants that really needs addressing. We need to introduce more efficiency and far less bureaucracy at the top. Look at German and French hospital methods, they are far more efficient and responsive.
‘Scandalously withdrawn from the EU’ ????
How dare we regain our status as a sovereign nation!
PURO VISAGE.
this is anti West propaganda. Go to about 6.39 minutes. Nothing bad was said about France. Think before you just click and like.
The UK was the tech nation well into the 20th Century . The US was considered a backward nation until under the Churchill Roosevelt agreement Britain handed over all its intellectual property to the US , from jet engines to the work on the Bomb to get the US to enter the war on our side in 1942 . The US was safe as Britain had stopped the NAZI progress westwards to the US . I have US aircraft design books from 1942 to prove that the country fell way short in aircraft development . Their best offering for a fighter was the P40 , which was suitable for ground attack only , not an air superiority fighter like the Spitfire or Hurricane . Radial engines and one under powered Allison V12 was their tech which had barely advanced since WW1 . Even the British company Austin of America (Bantam ) won the GP vehicle contest at Aberdeen Proving Ground with the Bantam Reconnaissance Car 40 , but naturally in the normal fashion gave the contract to Ford and Willy's . The Americans made sure that after the war in Europe as many items and people of technical achievement as possible were taken to the US .But later the British won the new NATO intermediate rifle and cartridge competition with the EM2 at the same place in 1957 , but true to form , the contract to build was given away to Winchester ( the 308 Win not being an intermediate cartridge at all which was out performed by the 280 British or 7 mm NATO ) with other companies getting the battle rifle . Some 60 years later realising that 7 mm was the way to go after all ! A nation that truly cuts of its nose to spite the face . Our intellectual property gave the US a massive post war boost in tech and their physical size did the rest ,while we rebuilt our shattered nation . From 1945 £1 = $4 , in the 70s £1= $2 , and now £1 = $ 1.30 or thereabouts . This is an example of our " special relationship '.
BAE Systems and British Aerospace was one and the same , not separate . Get it right . BAE was formed in 1997 from many large British multinationals like Marconi , De Havilland , Hawker etc ., when Boeing McDonald Douglas combined and after the formation of Lockheed Martin .
We designed and built Concorde which made the Americans cry and then banned it from their airspace . Boeing tried to build the 7207 supersonic airliner which failed miserably . We gave the Americans VTOL in the form of the Harrier GR8 for the USMC as they could not design such an aircraft nor could our Russian friends but at least they managed to get an example airborne . BAE has major input in the JSF and most other major projects and has interests in Airbus and several other European tech companies . The US B52 fleet has Rolls Royce engines , and try as they might Britain still holds the Land Speed Record with the SSC and is currently retraining US ' Top Gun ' pilots at the Mach Loop in Wales . BAE Systems has operations in Japan , Australia and North America . The interest in the UK variant Typhoon is continuing with Spain being the latest to buy a fleet . In other aspects the US has low tech NASCAR and Indycar , Britain hosts and develops high tech Formula 1 . Indias next carrier is likely to be British after the impressive QE class . The BAE Astute class submarine a world beater in tech and weapons but will not be on sale . What better company and country do you expect the best to be built ?
Only one thing wrong. Russia did build a vertical take off yak. The technology for which the US bought and used in the F35. It seems to be a lot better than the Harrier system which was complicated to operate. Britains biggest problem has always been it’s bought and paid for politicians. Look at TSR 2, it was ready to rock, they had hoped they could give it a fail but it was excellent ….and yet still they canned it!
This of course allowed the US to grab even more designers from us. The politicians grab failure from the jaws of victory every time.
You were the leading tech nation until WWII ended. After which, you jettisoned Churchill and embraced socialism and all its ills. We saved your bacon with equipment and manpower. Your .303 in the Spitfire (early models) was no competition compared to the Browning .50 cal. Get over yourself, you lost two to us and we saved Europe twice.
Sublime comment, very true snd sure to rile them up 😂😂
Why bash the yanks mate.
@@shaunsimpson9902 Because they steal the glory from better men!
The harrier was a great feat of engineering for the time. The only limits to our capabilities is money.
We seemed to have found plenty of money when it came to lock downs and covid , 700 billion in fact , what a waste ,plenty of bulging back pockets ?
Don't kid yourself about Britain one thing the Brits know is how to build high tech equipment.
I am glad the Brits and the USA are on the same frequency we are natural allies.
I think the Tempest will do really well, I may order a couple myself.
Great are setting up a evil army to over take the world? i like the sound of that i am in.
one for commute, another for the weekend. i get you
What are you some common peasant? You need one for every day of the week for each of your mansions around the world.
Just grab a six-pack.
The BAE Systems Tempest is a proposed sixth-generation fighter aircraft that is under development in the United Kingdom for the Royal Air Force (RAF). The aircraft is intended to enter service from 2035, gradually replacing the Eurofighter Typhoon. It is being developed as part of the Future Combat Air System (FCAS) programme by a consortium known as "Team Tempest", which includes the Ministry of Defence, BAE Systems, Rolls-Royce, Leonardo, and MBDA UK. £2 billion is planned to be spent by the British government on the initial phase of the project up to 2025.
My guy copy-pasted the whole wiki from Google.
Lol
🕳
without a manufacturing base or industry i find it hard to see how this can be built in the UK as of 2023
italian eletronica too dont forghet that uk and italy had an history of collaboration into aircraft building ( tornado 4.5 generation that it only under f 22 maby at long distance)
@@robshirewood5060 May i suggest you improve your understanding of the aerospace industry
The UK's 6th Gen fighter has no reason not to succeed: both the UK and Japan have the technological know-how to build advanced fighter jets; Italy too is a major European country that has big industrial companies that build advanced military hardware. The three together have the economic capacity and sizable military budgets to produce the Tempest.
its all going to come down to money, the engineering capability is not in doubt.
@@roundtheloopandback Japan alone could fund this project. UK, Italy and Japan combined will not struggle to finance this. Political will is what concerns me more.
@@Patrick-bu5vy agreed
Just a update.
Every part of the aircraft has now been practically tested and passed with flying colours... completely removing any doubt of engineering at this stage.
Also to correct the video... The Tempest is not to "replace the Eurofighter"... it's officially listed as "To complement and then replace Eurofighters AND F-35's"... And being the Royal Airforce is very open about preferring the Eurofighter over the F-35 in every single department... there is obviously plans to already remove the F-35 fleet and maybe even the carriers in the foreseeable future.
To me it looks a bit like a cross between a Eurofighter and a F-22... and it's sad that more European nations did not jump on board.
Bro this whole comment section is just Americans being annoyed that Britain Could make the best fighter jet in the world💀
Amazing when you consider it was us Brits who invented the Hovercraft, Landing systems for aircraft on carriers, Aircraft carriers, Tanks and much more. Today we don't invest in our young people and will pay a price long term but today we still contribute a fair amount.
I don't think so yours seems to be the only Annoying one here.
When the uk has built a world class plane AMERICA has always been the first to criticise and cause trouble.
"bro"?
Tosser - but your argument is dead right.
Exactly what we did in the 60s with TSR2. The yanks couldn't get that project closed fast enough because if rolled out, it would've made their whole airforce obsolete.
Britain is learning a hard lesson, don't really on EU Nations as partner's, don't really on USA as partner's, do what has always worked best, do what serves Britain best.
Tempest is our hope to be our own inovator's again, with the help of Italy and Japan, and any others who want to join. Look at how America gloats at the demise of the British aviation industry, and they are supposed to be our closest allies.
Aviation should always be pushing forward, our friends should be our allies, let America leave us alone and let us build what we see as the future. We were at the cutting edge but we allowed others to take the lead. We are coming back, others may thank us one day, because what is left if we are gone, isn't always what is right.
Really?? I guess you mean "rely"
@@olivierfaber8478 Yep, well spotted !
USA has a history of taking UK innovation and rewriting history with Hollywood to convince themselves over time that it was their invention.
Britain has to step up and invest into the armed forces, its irresponsible to just relie on our American bros
Soryy BREXIT is not scandalous it is democracy the choice of the people.
sure?
Considering the British have been at the forefront of Aviation since jet powered flight, they have a lot to offer in the area of speed and AI. Come to think of it the good ole brits have invented quite a few things now taken for granted. The Internet, Computer, Television, V.T.O. Tanks, Aircraft carriers. etc etc. The U.S. don't like to be second best at anything.
America can't be trusted as long as there are democrats.
Bump
Of your list tanks and prob aircraft carriers. The rest no.
@@bneira75 You may want to check facts first before you reply.
@@capmultsergo read a book Italy invented computer by Olivetti
Reality is that when the brits succeed it's quality - but obviously a lot of projects also don't make it or get screwed over by governments and whitehall. Being clear of the Germans and French and paired up with the Japanese and Italians bodes well as well. A lot of know how and multi national experience. I would speculate that a successful tempest will be the best 6th gen fighter currently in development - hopefully it progresses well enough to be exported as well.
The Brits just built 2 state of the art Aircraft carriers, im confident they will have no problem building aircraft with the Japanese, they have been a major contributor to the F35 JSF production aswell as the Eurofighter before that an so on all the way back to when the Brits Invented the Jet engine.. oh and they invented the Aircraft carrier too now I think of it.. damn poms :)
And the company in question is called Cyberdine Systems.🥴
It a good project the Japanese have a lot to add to this project they have done 4.5+ aircraft as well. Also they are very nifty with a silicon chip. It's a better foundation than eurofighter. So hopefully won't be nearly obsolete when entering service.
For 16 years they built the F-2 derived from the F-16. Unfortunately, Japanese own fleet was decimated by the 2011 tsunami.
I don't think the uk will be able to do this by ourselves, BUT with assistance from any or all of italy , spain, sweeden and maybe in the long run a non-european partner like India.
Britain end slavery by itself
Yes I think,the British if not stalled at all by the government,along with the Italians and the Japanese who are very good nations who build very good advanced stuff, could build a very good advanced 6 th generation fighter jet.the British were the first nation to build the harrier, VTOL jet,a class jet the first of its kind, and don't forget a lot of other things the old UK has built over the years, along with Italy and Japan,the trouble with the old USA without offense is they don't like to be out matched at anything these days.i respect the US for helping us in our time's of need, and sharing their technology with us and the rest of the world, but they can't be the best all the time.
I cant imagine France Germany and Spain working together cohesively - the UK Japan and Italy are more likely to have a 6Gen Fighter , the main issue with Europe is they dont have their own global satellite system , this needs to change
European GPS is called Gallileo and it has been around for quite a few years now.
@@onlymeok The system is intended primarily for civilian use, unlike the more military-oriented systems of the United States (GPS), Russia (GLONASS) and China (BeiDou). The European system will only be subject to shutdown for military purposes in extreme circumstances (such as an armed conflict)
Uk and japan working cohesively...then the emotional, though solid engineering, of the Italians.
Btw...worked with Japanese and for an Italian firm. Never working for an Italian firm again....too emotionaly draining.
@@chrisjones7236 My father worked on several projects for Ferranti Systems in the early 90's. He said the management structure drove him mad. The engineers were top notch but everyone in charge was hyper emotional and over sensitive to critisism which became personal and slowed progress to a standstill. He managed just 4 years with them before walking out.
@@onlymeok galileo is italian sistem plese, half of spase station was built in italy and nasa for his new moom travel and colonization is joint wit alenia aerospace italy of corse
Its UK… Sweden and Italy! Where do your information come from? It seems to be very wrong, this is the 2nd false information in a short time… the GLSDB video, its a joint effort between Boeing and Saab , and the most modern gear must be the Archer artillery system.🙄
first off NATO has nothing to do with it
it is being developed by the British and Japanese
Yes. The Japanese FX project has merged with the Tempest fighter, but Italy is also in as an equal partner.
@@001Jonno do you remenber by who has built tornado and ef2000? and where is assembled and rapair american f 35 an other american plane ? in Cameriry thae first in venice officine aeronavali the second .
@@lucianorosarelli-xr5lr A four, later three, nation consortium called Panavia built the Tornado. The Eurofighter is built by a four nation consortium, which I think is just called Eurofighter. Many Brits will argue that British Aerospace primarily designed both, but that's up for discussion. Assembly of the F-35 is done at three sites: off the top of my head, I think they're Fort Worth Texas, Cameri near Milan, and somewhere near Tokyo. I haven't heard of anything about Venice.
The question is not weather the Europeans are capable of building a cutting edge technologically advanced 6th generation fighter, but how soon, in what numbers, and how effective it will be against the adversary's capabilities in the future.
The same questions hang over the US given the rise of China and the brics nations together with the declining state of the US economy.
But can Britain afford to build it, or will we give it to the USA as we did with Harrier.
you live where. the great santini.
Doesn't that resemble the F-23. Like a modern version.
It will never be built.
Never going to happen.
isn't only british but italy is present too japon for now seems pay only for take kowelange ant motors pheraps
How dare you miss pronounce my local town it's not Farn boro It's pronounced. Farn brer Or Farn b rer
looke good c how performanceonthe battlefield ukraine mid30 2 late
This is a BAE project, no NATO...ffs.
its good that there are more projects and more countries develop new generation.
Sure looks like an updated YF-23
Well that’s the rumoured plane that Japan was working off for it next gen. But they maybe now joining the uk in the Tempest program
It looks nothing like one. It's more like a stealthy Tornado to me.
Finalmente um pouco de personalidade propria na Europa, coisa que só a Inglaterra mostrava, aprovo a ideia de terem suas proprias forças armadas e defesas, de qualquer forma são aliados dos EUA, também os britanicos estão certos, nada de um exercito unico, isso é besteira e a variedade é melhor, basta serem aliados.
I dont know why they are even bothering with the manned version. Adding the man limits the specs and adds a ton of weight and tech needs. I suppose the issue for the Europeans is the lack of satellites for long range control - they would have a limited area of operation unless they access our military satellite network.
As NATO members Europeans don't need to duplicate the US satellite network - they can and are contributing to it.
If there is a full war I do not think satellites will be working for long.
@@rumchjoe Yanks think they're the only ones who can do everything. Ignore him. I'm noticing a lot of resentment from them on this thread.
Lightning.
Typhoon.
Tempest.
Hurricane?
Spitfire?
Cool , never to late in Advanced Technologies in the Aviation Field .
Was Russia not shocked this time? 😆
I wish you’d stop the click air titles and title pictures. Cheapens the channel IMHO.
Barley mentions Japan and Italy merging projects. It's a virtual done deal.
You forgot another player The Swedish, already having a 4.5 Gen Saab Gripen ..
두 섬나라가 하는 건 믿음이 안감..
The Btitish cannot even build a car that does not leak oil😂😂
????🤡
Weird... Harleys were known to leak like a sieve.
@@gryph01 not more than Jaguar, Land Rover, Austin, MG, should I go on.
I have experienced all of them in my life time.
Ps. I am a South African, do not know what Harleys have to do with me?
A Harley is an American motorbike. 😂 You are confused, are you talking about an Austin-Healy, a classic 50s sports car whose scroll seal would leak after a long time. One classic old car that's worth >$50000 now!
Modern cars do not leak, I own a jaguar F-type that does not leak oil. Theres plenty of american cars that have a lot of stock faults, you are using a poor generalization!
British engineering such as Rolls Royce lead the world, you only have to look at Jet engines used on modern Aircraft. The US B52 bomber is just getting an upgrade to RR engines!
Oh! dear, british engines on your Nucleasr bomber force!
And just for interest about leaks the US Lockheed SR71 used to leak fuel all over the runway before takeoff because of it's high speed the design had loose fitting panels and this affected the fuel tanks!
Hoping the Brits succeed.
It has SFA to do with NATO. It is an all British aircraft! Japan and Saab have been brought in pst design as partners who will build and use the jet and last time I looked, Japan was not in bloody NATO, a now useless EuSSR body
In the coming years it sounds like the NATO Alliance will still be strong but without a dominant partner (i.e. the United States). This conflict in the Ukraine has made Europe nervous enough and has shown their vulnerabilities such as being dependent upon an aggressive and unpredictable neighbor; Russia. I think that the one country poised to become the dominant power in Europe is France. Access to the sea both north and south as well as promoting energy independence through such so-called controversial energy sources (nuclear) and large areas of food producing land will make France able to make its own way in the world while still keeping a foot in the door with NATO.
France, ie the French?
@John Goldsworthy -- What about Germany?
The USA Will remain the dominate power in NATO for the simple fact the we pay 90% of NATOs bills. Once we get ride of this demented old fool of a President (the worst in the history of America) The USA will continue to dominate. We learned the lesson of WW2. It’s not what is ON the surface of the ocean, it’s what lurks Below that is the power of the USA all 65 of them. Not one ship of an enemy would survive the first week of a conflict. As proved in the Ukraine war, the might of the USAF would dominate in one day, no one has even a hint of the stealth attack and complete destruction of a countries infrastructure if the USA enters a war without restrictions. Why do you think we just announced the B-21 Raider which has a radar signature of a fly. As with the F-117, still in service, the Aurora sixth generation fighter is already flying, they just haven’t told you about it. France, 1 Aircraft Carrier, USA 13 Carrier Groups.
@JamesJ30t Germany couldn't field a fully staffed and equipped brigade. They have been happy to let the USA handle that for them. France, while better off, doesn't have the will or the capability. NATO without the USA is nothing.
@@ruger3268 -- From what I have heard Germany has made significant increases to their milatary budget. Also at 3.85 trillion they have highest GDP of any western European nation.,
Scandalously left the EU? WTF do you think you are? I'd worry about the decline of the USA before I comment on what the people of the UK have decided to do.
when we are left to our own devices, and not hamstrung politically, we are some of the finest innovators on the planet. unfortunately our politicians are usually bought by foreign powers ands we get their substandard shite.
Actually, 6G fighters should be unmanned and low cost. It is a waste of money and lives to put a pilot in a fighter, when there is no need to.
What’s the Union flag, missing Northern Irelands flag all about?
The Tempest project aircraft looks a lot like the USA's F-22 twin engine aircraft on the outside.
When you take aircraft design to a conclusion similarities are always going to happen.
What, because its got wings and engines just like the f22? Come to think of it, it looks like a lot of planes....
We don't need to copy you drip. Lol
@@mikeycraig8970 Calling me names, just because you don't like my opinion, does not enhance your point, Mikey.
@@MegaGeorge1948 Listen, you Americans think you created everything, you think nobody else has the sophistication or intelligence to pioneer their own designs. We were the first nation to have most of things your military takes for granted (some of your military equipment IS British lol), if anything YOU imitate US!
So excuse me for calling you nanes, but if you look it up its perfectly apt.
@@MegaGeorge1948 The only thing is, he is quite correct. Neither do I, see the 'glaring' resemblence of the (proposed) Tempest and the F22?
“Scandalously” withdrawn from the EU? Stick to weapons.
Germany might jump ship and partner of Britain again.
Wow, I didn't know the new UK PM was a Jihadist. Dangerous.
A very clunky jig-saw like video report with many errors.
That wasn’t the British flag at the beginning…….get it right and don’t insult us.
Its now a Anglo- Japanese project. the plane will look nothing like the one shown
The UK can make great stuff, so I am not worried about this.
The result of the Tempest will be a Jas 40.
Yeah lets not forget American companies are notorious for bribery and corruption when it comes to obtaining contracts and have been sanctioned more than once so one of them sticking their oar in and scuttling the project wouldn't be the first time. Do I think it will come to be I think it is possible but only time will tell. As far as the multinational European fighter goes there is a bit of a history of too many cooks and it wouldn't be the first time someone took their bat a ball and went home.
If I had to guess about 6th gen fighter say US definitely, Japan probably and UK and Europe Maybe.
Mate you got the British Flag 🇬🇧 wrong!
New prime minister, none of us voted him in he was forced on us.
Thank You Sam and Military News. 👍🎄 🇺🇲
China has led in unlimited battery energy! They are already known the technology of 3D printed ceramic impeller and metal to form a large-volume heterogeneous bearing turbine. Your video is common and nothing special
The F-35 is 15% to 20% British engineered
NATO? You mean the UK that is 🇬🇧💪
The UK flag is wrong it missing the diagonal red cross of ireland
And Wales is left out a lot I know how you feel
bla bla bla bla. !!!! Where is the new plane ? bla bla bla bla !!!!!!
Rishis fighter is the Hindustan Marut.
A divided europe is what america like. This is a good project but wont work. If you already have alternatives you wont find great motivation to do it. British used to be an innovative nation but they lost it since they became dependant to us.
exactly william.. these guys that put up futuristic videos just for ratings....lol
3:43
And on the right side you have your apps !
Spotify, netflix etc.
PS: we had to cut some corners so we added Google maps in the app tray.
Crazy good !!!
I wish you used a more prominent headed photo , instead of some Aircraft that doesn’t even exist,, it’s nice to get the latest on developments of this new platform, but plz in future keep it real 👍
Brition is no longer British.
Who gave you your last year's design in kiddy toys and pictures and definitions of jet and jet black ⚫️ ❤️
In 10 years is the prototype ready. For example 2 billion pro unit. Or more.
....works as good as American hypersonic missiles??🤣🤣
They can not even build functional cars … so, nothing to be afraid of.
I think you underemphasised the Japanese contribution to this.
I noticed the Tempest mock up has Tornado undercarriage fitted.
Nato you can test your aircraft highest 7 grade it make no difference.
we pronounce it like this "farm-bruh". i was born here.
All for naught, we're living in the Nuclear weapons era.
On the eve of WWIII, this is what's happening. 🤔🤔
who is in the photo at 8:04 ؟
Stolenberg, Caputova, Erdo, Biden
@@728355624 thanks
Does BAE intend to use a Glass Cockpit.
USA or NATO ???
Tempest has nothing to do with NATO ?
nice informations
Will it run on windows 98 like the latest aircraft carrier ?
It's not that America won't protect them. They just need them to also help themselves.
Uk has to step up and be a stronger aille to our American bros😊
Did the UK/BAE Systems make any part of F35🤔
20%
Why do you sound like WATOP
So F-14 vs 6th gen then
An unelected PM
😂😂😂😂