In the video I switched the player's sides. It's actually Zwardon that has the black pieces. Harutyun Barseghyan vs Vojtech Zwardon Pro Chess League (2018), chess.com INT, rd 4, Feb-04 Budapest Defense: Rubinstein Variation (A52)
#Suggetion @agadmator's Chess Channel hello Mr. Agadmator, you never showed a game with Latvian Gambit. Won't it be nice to show a exciting game with Latvian gambit, it can be. gamman vs Joseph Henry Blackburne 1869, or another game, Bobby Fischer vs Victors pupols 1955. Both are exciting. Whichever you feel like to show us. Thanks you so much for your huge contribution to chess world
Your channel has grown so fast. When I first saw one of your videos it had "only" 8000 or so subscribers and that wasn't such a long ago, not even a year I guess. And the channel keeps growing and growing and growing...Wouldn't surprise me if one day your it will be the most popular chess channel on UA-cam. It shows that you don't necessarily need to have a title to appeal to the chess community. More important is passion for the game and the rare gift to explain complicated things in way that they seem rather simple and nonetheless beautiful.
Hi, love your videos, follow you since a while now; I was wondering if, at minute 3:23, instead of capturing on g4, Qa4 could be a better move in the long term.
As of 10:54pm Eastern US time on February 13th, you have 101,995 subs. Which means we're going to see 102K tomorrow morning. AWESOME. You didn't reach 100K, you blew right past 100K. Keep growing strong, Agadmator!!!
5:55 -- Even better than Nd3 was for White to simply straight-up attack with cxd6 (eliminating the center-board bishop's anchor), and suddenly it is Black who is on the ropes given the impressive array of firepower on the C and D files. So, the major blunder isn't that White desired to move his queen, it's that the very idea of capturing the bishop-anchoring pawn never occurred to him at all. (The engine prefers Black retaking with his own c-pawn in order to keep the anchor going, but White is still +1.7ish following that by only then playing Nd3, and Black's best move following that is the seemingly wasteful Bd4, forfeiting his important bishop just after shoring up its foundations), exd4, Rxh4 (not Rxd4, as that permits a Qc3 rook skewer), d5 (taking the rook is a blunder), Rxh5, Nf4, Rg5, Rc4, Rgg8, Qc3 (and Black's irritating f3 pawn is now lost at White's leisure).
Thank you for your videos, I know it's weak but I grew from 600 to 900 mostly from watching your side tatics that would not work, I watch other vid that don't cover why not to take easy prices good job
I've been accepting all gambits and I love them, but I'm about 50/50 with them as when I screw up and I'm toast. However, when I do defend properly I tend to destroy them once I am able to go on the attack.
How are openings and variations named? Italian game , sicilian, london system , indian defence , budapest gambit are all named after places not after individuals like Najdorf variation for example.
As I understand it, the openings/defenses that have names like the Sicilian, Dutch defense, etc are much older openings. For example the Sicilian goes back to at least the 1590's. The more recent, or modern variations I believe are named for the person who more or less developed them, such as the Najdorf variation, among others. Thats at least my understanding of the naming.
Yeah, seems like the "newer" variations are named for the player who developed it. Seems like older ones are named for the region they first became known in. At least thats the way it seems anyway.
The Italian game is named as such because it was developed, heavily played and theorized by early Italian players; I'm guessing the others are named for similar reasons.
It depends upon whether it is mainly a collective effort at a single place ( Budapest, Berlin, Chelyabinsk, etc.) , a place where it first appeared on the tournament circuit ( e.g. Scheveningen), the aesthetical appearance (e.g. hedgehog, dragon, hippopotamus, but also stuff like "fried liver") , etc. The "Indian" openings stem from an impressed Staunton who was for years in India, where the local chess scene was totally into non-standard approaches that neglect ( in contrast and alien to "scientific" European wisdom, from Ruy Lopez to Philidor) the centre at the beginning; mainly the King`s Indian. - I like it, as the patchwork taxonomy in chess does not necessarily follow "abstract" timeless rules, but grew rather historically.
2 minute ish mark... I kept expecting a line with Qd5. Say at 2:12, bxN (I am a player who prefers knights more and I don’t think it bad to trade a bad bishop for a strong knight), bxe5, and then Qd5. If the bishop retreats, what is wrong with N e4? Yes, it leaves the b pawn undefended, but does black have enough time to recapture at the cost of strengthening the white rook? If black defends the g pawn with either pawn then white’s bishop is a serious pain. And if he moves the bishop to h6, then the rook is gone with Qe5+. If at this point B f6, then the knight will capture and after the queen recaptures, white skewers with be5. Am I missing something?
we can see you're not yet an expert on this gambit ! At 1:25 u say 4.Nf3 allows black to go ...d6 while d6 is sometimes an idea in the budapest (after 4.e4 for example), here it looks pretty bad : after 5.Bg5 will have to put his queen on the awkward d7 square and won't have much for his pawn. Much better are Bc5 or Nc6. If you want to try it i recommend moskalenko's great book "the fabulous budapest gambit"
I play Budapest gambit in blitz game. Maximum times people exchange Bishop for my Knight and is winning for me in end games with Bishop pair. 1700-1900rated players can understand me.. So a big like for Budapest gambit
#agadmator... after white Rc1-c2, isn't Rg1 check a forced checkmate in 3? Am i missing something here? After Rg1, king has to take-on the rook, as e-file is guarded by the queen, then Qg6 check. After King moves to either f1 or h1/h2 then Qg2 check mate!.. isn't the correct checkmate line?
@@davidcopson5800 not saying it doesn't lose at all, but if Rg1, K:g1 Qg6 no longer works,as after Kf1 and Qg2 you have the e1 square free to escape. And you're still up the exchange as white. And I am quite sure Qc8 is not the way to go as you are down the exchange. that attack has to finish with mate or recouping material as black. Edit...I figured it out. It loses to Qe2. After Q :e2 f:e2 Ke1 e:d1 R:d1 Rg1 then R:d1. Makes no difference
31. ... Bg4 is stronger than Qe2+, because it leads to mate in 4 (32. Kg1 Bh3+ 32. Kh2 Qg6 33. Rg1 Qxg1+ 34. Kxh3 Qh1#) Also, after 31. ... Qe2+ 32. Rxe2 fxe2+ 33. Ke1 Rg1+ 34. Kd2 it’s better to grab the rook on d1 with the rook.
It doesn't really matter because of the same idea as was played in the game. If 31. Qa6, then ...Qe2+ 32. Q:e2 fe+ 33. Ke1 ed(Q)+ 34. R:d1 Rg1+ and you'd have absolutely the same position as if you'd played 31. Rc2 :) Cheers
Shriprajwal Krishnamurthy read carefully, friend, 31. ... Qe2+, not 31. ... Qa2 :) After the check, white queen is forced to capture black queen, so there are no checkmate ideas for white :)
he explained it there, bc if the pawn moves it will leave the king open to the rook when the bishop moves, wich means u have to give up the queen and u dont wanna do that
Correct me if I am wrong but the strongest move I found(Forced mate in 2/3) on 8:52 was 1. Rg1+ king got nothing to do except capture, Kxg1 2. Qg6+ and now king can go to f1, h1, or h2 but all them are checkmate if you play Qg2# Edit: Nvm after Qg2+ if the king was on f1 it can escape to e2
after white Bf4 the main idea is 4) g5 . The inaccuracy is 5) Bg3, the solid and strong white reply is Bd2 ( according to the book "the fabulous Budapest Gambit" written by Moskalenko
@@paolosala1809 Interesting, I didn't even know I was watching Agadmator's videos two years+ ago. His presentation is so much better now. I see. That book was written after I stopped playing, would have been interesting to read at the time. The guy who taught me the Budapest never mentioned g5. This was before pretty much anyone had home internet, so research was a lot harder! A different age, I suppose.
![[NEW🔥] A Different Budapest Gambit You Don't See!!!](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/FB2kAjUWpp0/mqdefault.jpg)
I finally found the winning move to the puzzle for the first time, the "congratulations you're a strong player" made my day.
I found Bishop to G4. I'm just lucky sometimes, though.
...Bg4 came to my mind instantly...
@Paul Lammers what about moving rook to h1 in 3 movements
squealer Yes, bishop to G4 is forced mate in 2 so it’s way better
@@suryatallavarjula3184 It's not, with Bg4, Kg1 is possible, and White can survive a little longer.
Can we just appreciate how good he is at reading names 😂😂
He took tuition from me regarding this.
In the video I switched the player's sides. It's actually Zwardon that has the black pieces.
Harutyun Barseghyan vs Vojtech Zwardon
Pro Chess League (2018), chess.com INT, rd 4, Feb-04
Budapest Defense: Rubinstein Variation (A52)
After Black's Qe6, why not Qa6 for White?
Roberto Teodoro ... I think because if Qa6, then ... Qe2 is checkmate right away, before white would have a chance to play Qb7#
#Suggetion @agadmator's Chess Channel hello Mr. Agadmator, you never showed a game with Latvian Gambit. Won't it be nice to show a exciting game with Latvian gambit, it can be.
gamman vs Joseph Henry Blackburne 1869, or another game, Bobby Fischer vs Victors pupols 1955. Both are exciting. Whichever you feel like to show us.
Thanks you so much for your huge contribution to chess world
I love it when you give us chance to find best move!! Thanks Agad.
i never find it lol
7:17 the pawn hanged for 12 seconds.....😂😂😂
I follow you since you had 1,500 subs and I am happy, that your content gets bigger and is still as great as from the first moment :)
Thank you! :)
Giveaway suggestion: a signed chess borard by you.
also with the words "What's the idea here" on one side, and "Hello, everyone" on the other.
that would be just fantastic :D
jeremy hulbert "What you gonna do here?"
"Whats the idea here?" On one signed then "You'll see in a moment (ahah)" on the other + his signature.
Or "Congratulations you're a great player"
You do such an awesome job buddy. Keep up the original and informational content.
Your channel has grown so fast. When I first saw one of your videos it had "only" 8000 or so subscribers and that wasn't such a long ago, not even a year I guess. And the channel keeps growing and growing and growing...Wouldn't surprise me if one day your it will be the most popular chess channel on UA-cam. It shows that you don't necessarily need to have a title to appeal to the chess community. More important is passion for the game and the rare gift to explain complicated things in way that they seem rather simple and nonetheless beautiful.
And it's in this position in 2021 that his channel is the most popular chess channel on UA-cam
Love your videos! Keep em coming!
"After I reach 100,000 subscribers" ...later today, no doubt
Love your channel keep up the good work!
7:21 what's the pawn doin' there on f2? hehehe
Hanging
That's the Indecisive Pawn gambit. Invented circa Just Now, by Agadmator.
I think you could say that ... the pawn is mating the king 8D
wrong question. The correct one is
"The pawn is hanging on f2. Now, what's the idea here?"
panda4247 hahahahaha
Awesome video sir i really tried the budapest Gambit inspired from this and i just won!! Thanks to ya BRO..
I love this site, keep these videos coming =)
"chess is the struggle against error"
Way to go Agad. 100k milestone won't make you wait more. Really like your videos👍👌👌
This is one of my favorite games at these levels 🙂 These types of games are why I play chess
Yesss you're so close to 100k. Early congrats!
Chess never ends... so amazing ..
Cestitam na 100k. Pozdrav!
Prize?? Of course wE WAnt tHe d0G.
Hi, love your videos, follow you since a while now; I was wondering if, at minute 3:23, instead of capturing on g4, Qa4 could be a better move in the long term.
Najbolji si!
As of 10:54pm Eastern US time on February 13th, you have 101,995 subs. Which means we're going to see 102K tomorrow morning. AWESOME. You didn't reach 100K, you blew right past 100K. Keep growing strong, Agadmator!!!
- " Budapest Gambit ??? Hold my beer... " (Budapest mayor)
Још 64 субскрајбера! Браво царе само настави!
You're doing great job
Great game!
Great game, tactically well played from the black side.
Hey. agadmator. What's the continuation of Qa6 instead of Rc2?!.. Continue the good work.. thanks for awesome games you show us..
100.000 congratulations !!!
You and I remember Budapest very differently
Have you seen the game where an amateur beat GM Max Dlugy with the Budapest gambit? If not, you'll enjoy! :)
Well, I for one, definitely want it to be covered by Agadmator. #suggestion
Hope u find a chance to play it! Seems interesting. My first time seeing this gambit
I found both moves, I am an excellent bragger
A very interesting gambit, but also a very risky and dangerous one with two many threats, and dirty deadly traps!
Awesome 💪 thanks for Budapest Gambit.
Could you please show Gambits & refutations?
5:55 -- Even better than Nd3 was for White to simply straight-up attack with cxd6 (eliminating the center-board bishop's anchor), and suddenly it is Black who is on the ropes given the impressive array of firepower on the C and D files. So, the major blunder isn't that White desired to move his queen, it's that the very idea of capturing the bishop-anchoring pawn never occurred to him at all. (The engine prefers Black retaking with his own c-pawn in order to keep the anchor going, but White is still +1.7ish following that by only then playing Nd3, and Black's best move following that is the seemingly wasteful Bd4, forfeiting his important bishop just after shoring up its foundations), exd4, Rxh4 (not Rxd4, as that permits a Qc3 rook skewer), d5 (taking the rook is a blunder), Rxh5, Nf4, Rg5, Rc4, Rgg8, Qc3 (and Black's irritating f3 pawn is now lost at White's leisure).
Well presented.
Great gambit.
I like you so much, keep doing good work
Today's quote should be: "Another victim of the Budapest Gambit." - Homer Simpson
Cool quote
D'oh!
I love the Budapest Gambit. If only I could induce my chess app to set me up by playing d4 c4 more often..... if only
Thank you for your videos, I know it's weak but I grew from 600 to 900 mostly from watching your side tatics that would not work, I watch other vid that don't cover why not to take easy prices good job
Congrats on 100k subscribers
@2:54 instead of H5. Is it good to move to C5? If pawn takes pawn then trade queens, but black can’t castle anymore.
Do more of those "feel free to pause the video and find the best possible move!"
already reach 100k sub ..congratulation
Great game
question: having a slight edge means having a little (extra) advantage?.
ommazx correct
thanks
Congratulations for reaching 100k subscribers
I've been accepting all gambits and I love them, but I'm about 50/50 with them as when I screw up and I'm toast. However, when I do defend properly I tend to destroy them once I am able to go on the attack.
In the video at 7:40, cant white play Qa6?
How are openings and variations named?
Italian game , sicilian, london system , indian defence , budapest gambit are all named after places not after individuals like Najdorf variation for example.
As I understand it, the openings/defenses that have names like the Sicilian, Dutch defense, etc are much older openings. For example the Sicilian goes back to at least the 1590's. The more recent, or modern variations I believe are named for the person who more or less developed them, such as the Najdorf variation, among others.
Thats at least my understanding of the naming.
I am not sure but I think they are named after players who “invented” them.
Yeah, seems like the "newer" variations are named for the player who developed it. Seems like older ones are named for the region they first became known in. At least thats the way it seems anyway.
The Italian game is named as such because it was developed, heavily played and theorized by early Italian players; I'm guessing the others are named for similar reasons.
It depends upon whether it is mainly a collective effort at a single place ( Budapest, Berlin, Chelyabinsk, etc.) , a place where it first appeared on the tournament circuit ( e.g. Scheveningen), the aesthetical appearance (e.g. hedgehog, dragon, hippopotamus, but also stuff like "fried liver") , etc. The "Indian" openings stem from an impressed Staunton who was for years in India, where the local chess scene was totally into non-standard approaches that neglect ( in contrast and alien to "scientific" European wisdom, from Ruy Lopez to Philidor) the centre at the beginning; mainly the King`s Indian. - I like it, as the patchwork taxonomy in chess does not necessarily follow "abstract" timeless rules, but grew rather historically.
Cool game
2 minute ish mark... I kept expecting a line with Qd5. Say at 2:12, bxN (I am a player who prefers knights more and I don’t think it bad to trade a bad bishop for a strong knight), bxe5, and then Qd5. If the bishop retreats, what is wrong with N e4? Yes, it leaves the b pawn undefended, but does black have enough time to recapture at the cost of strengthening the white rook? If black defends the g pawn with either pawn then white’s bishop is a serious pain. And if he moves the bishop to h6, then the rook is gone with Qe5+. If at this point B f6, then the knight will capture and after the queen recaptures, white skewers with be5. Am I missing something?
Maybe a book which explains how to play endgames or middlegames??
Lovely attacking chess
Hurray 100k !
What a great ending.
Check out the games from Tata steel a few years back, Rapport beat Gelfand and Jobava beat Wojtasek. Both used the Budapest gambit
I thought you finally got to play your preparation when I saw your title.
Would you ever consider doing lower rates games? I'm sure you can find a lot to say, even if it is mainly mistakes.
we can see you're not yet an expert on this gambit ! At 1:25 u say 4.Nf3 allows black to go ...d6
while d6 is sometimes an idea in the budapest (after 4.e4 for example), here it looks pretty bad : after 5.Bg5 will have to put his queen on the awkward d7 square and won't have much for his pawn. Much better are Bc5 or Nc6.
If you want to try it i recommend moskalenko's great book "the fabulous budapest gambit"
I play Budapest gambit in blitz game. Maximum times people exchange Bishop for my Knight and is winning for me in end games with Bishop pair. 1700-1900rated players can understand me.. So a big like for Budapest gambit
Agad What about Qg6 as the winning move? Seems pretty forcing as well.
Was this a blitz game? Does the Budapest ever get used in classical time controls?
4:25 yeah, rook to g3.
Fantastic sacrificy
Wtf i was there at like 3/4000 subs know he has 100k that was going fast dude :O
I found the Bg4 move, but missed Qe2. Pretty!
I Guess it will be better if you made play series on Chess Openings and end Games.
#agadmator... after white Rc1-c2, isn't Rg1 check a forced checkmate in 3? Am i missing something here? After Rg1, king has to take-on the rook, as e-file is guarded by the queen, then Qg6 check. After King moves to either f1 or h1/h2 then Qg2 check mate!.. isn't the correct checkmate line?
I think another beautiful chess set would be great to giveaway!
I am going to study the Budapest Gambit thoroughly.
Your chess set would be great for a give away....thnx x
Bravo
At 9:37 instead of e×d1, R× d1 is way better as at the end of the skirmish u can be up a bishop and a Queen
U have not discussed Qa6 defence instead of Rc2
4:39 WE NEED TO MAKE A PARODY
By Tal, that was a great game!
wasn't 31.Qa6 also a possiblity to defend e2? whilst threatning checkmate?
Still probably losing to Rg1+. The black queen can also retreat to c8 to fend off mate if she so wished.
@@davidcopson5800 not saying it doesn't lose at all, but if Rg1, K:g1 Qg6 no longer works,as after Kf1 and Qg2 you have the e1 square free to escape. And you're still up the exchange as white. And I am quite sure Qc8 is not the way to go as you are down the exchange. that attack has to finish with mate or recouping material as black.
Edit...I figured it out. It loses to Qe2. After Q :e2 f:e2 Ke1 e:d1 R:d1 Rg1 then R:d1. Makes no difference
That winning move was obvious
the channel went so fast from 50k to 100k, planning to smoke some bud if theres gonna be a chess stream, championship or something
31. ... Bg4 is stronger than Qe2+, because it leads to mate in 4 (32. Kg1 Bh3+ 32. Kh2 Qg6 33. Rg1 Qxg1+ 34. Kxh3 Qh1#) Also, after 31. ... Qe2+ 32. Rxe2 fxe2+ 33. Ke1 Rg1+ 34. Kd2 it’s better to grab the rook on d1 with the rook.
You have a speedcuber in your home? :D
Wild game
On 31st move, instead of rc2 why not Qa6? Defends the Qe2 threat also threatening check mate?
It doesn't really matter because of the same idea as was played in the game. If 31. Qa6, then ...Qe2+ 32. Q:e2 fe+ 33. Ke1 ed(Q)+ 34. R:d1 Rg1+ and you'd have absolutely the same position as if you'd played 31. Rc2 :)
Cheers
Nik Bereziuk if 31.Qa6 is played then the threat is Qb7 checkmate. So if 31 ...Qa2 then 32 Qb7 wind the game. No Qxa2.
Shriprajwal Krishnamurthy read carefully, friend, 31. ... Qe2+, not 31. ... Qa2 :) After the check, white queen is forced to capture black queen, so there are no checkmate ideas for white :)
Nik Bereziuk yeah. I'm sorry. Realised that now. Got confused.
7:47 why not queen a6 ?? Seems winning move for white.
Well, the black queen could retreat to c8 anyway to repel mate, but Rg1+, Kxg1 Qg6+, Kf1 Qg2+, Ke1 Qg1+, Kd2 Qxf2+ looks very dangerous for white.
I didn’t understand why white don’t play pawn capture on f3 at 4:40
Can someone explain me ?
he explained it there, bc if the pawn moves it will leave the king open to the rook when the bishop moves, wich means u have to give up the queen and u dont wanna do that
Correct me if I am wrong but the strongest move I found(Forced mate in 2/3) on 8:52 was
1. Rg1+ king got nothing to do except capture, Kxg1
2. Qg6+ and now king can go to f1, h1, or h2 but all them are checkmate if you play Qg2#
Edit: Nvm after Qg2+ if the king was on f1 it can escape to e2
E2 is covered by the pawn my friend. But it can however go to E1 then to g2 and escape. Rg1 is no good
I played the Budapest for years and I never played 4. g5. Would always have played Nc6 in that position. Has the main line changed?
after white Bf4 the main idea is 4) g5 . The inaccuracy is 5) Bg3, the solid and strong white reply is Bd2 ( according to the book "the fabulous Budapest Gambit" written by Moskalenko
@@paolosala1809 Interesting, I didn't even know I was watching Agadmator's videos two years+ ago. His presentation is so much better now.
I see. That book was written after I stopped playing, would have been interesting to read at the time. The guy who taught me the Budapest never mentioned g5. This was before pretty much anyone had home internet, so research was a lot harder! A different age, I suppose.
Please show games between Karpov and Hou Yifan
at 4.25 is it rook to c3 or bishop to c3? got confused...hahahaha
Anything on Gioachino Greco?
3:10 I think the reason why White can't win a piece with Qa4+ is that after Qd7 Bxc4, Black has Bxc3+ and there goes the queen.
how does black break in on the kingside
Please do a video on early queen sac where that player wins
#suggestion simul between Kasparov and W Corinna, Kasparov loses to the Pyrenees gambit! Nice game