Still rocking my D7100 in 2024,purchased new in 2013. Think it’s feature set still viable and can accommodate multiple lenses which in today second hard market pricing is very attractive.
DSLRs peaked in the 2010s tbh. I got my D810 in 2014 and it's still more than enough for anything I want to shoot and will be until it breaks, hopefully not for another decade. Modern cameras have slightly better AF, slightly better DR, little QOL features, but light hasn't changed, older cameras are still going to perform fundamentally the same as they did when they came out.
@@WyattFredaCowie Excellent comment/advice. I’ve had a D7000 for years and it serves my needs perfectly well. However, I was offered a D810 with fewer than 3000 actuations, virtually new condition and for an incredibly low price. I’m still trying to find out what’s wrong with it!
If you take any advice from this angry fella, it should be this. Reality check, unless you are pulling in a full time income from photography, or have tons of cash to blow...you dont need the "professional" equipment. Get LAST YEARS PRO GEAR. Get the gear they are selling for discounts now that they are trading up. They made that gear work and if you practice enough you can too.
Alysuis True. He was right that a pro could use just about any camera and get better results than most amateur photographers. I know any of the full frame cameras are great, but still getting great shots in a APS-C sensor, plus more telephoto range on the full frame lenses, is a bargain.
Heck, I am a full time professional photographer and the only equipment I EVER buy is last year’s or the year before equipment. Sure, some things are better on some of the new equipment but to me they are not worth $3000+ more to get right now.
I am a retired professional portrait photographer. You are right spot on!!! I bought a D7100 and absolutely LOVE IT. Spent some money on GLASS. You tell 'em like it is. You are refreshing.
Hi My nasty Friend, this is still my favorite of all your Videos. As a Pro shooter for over 40 Years I have counted on you for 90% of my gear needs reviews. I love the straight talk, the Bad words we all use and your candor in general. I now Shoot Fuji XH1, XT2 and my First XT1 I will never sell. I have gone thru 3 D7100 for Pro Work since it came out Bravo! Your the Man. Thanks.
Best damned advice ever! I am a professional Photographer. Nikons I own: D7000, 7100, 7200, 700, 750, 800, 800E, 810, D3, D3s, D3x, D4, and D4s. Multiples of most and I own a lot of older bodies...that aren't relevant so they are not listed. My preferences are the D7200 (I shoot very quickly and choke the D7100..You wont have that problem) Give me a D7000-7200 and a 85 1.8 and I am making Money! At a 24-70 and 70-200 f2.8 and I can shoot anything that needs shooting. I have not directly compared the D7100, but the D7200 destroys my D4 in auto focus (nobody wants to hear this)....Probably my D4s as well....Its that good The D7200 gives up a tiny bit of quality at ISO 100-1000 to the D7100...I am not a pixel peeper so I could care less. Resolution is not a problem nor is printing billboards.....Despite what the "experts" tell you. For me the only FX bodies I am thrilled with are the D810 and my beloved D700's. The 700s because ....we have history together! The D810 because it makes my 85 1.4 Zeiss Otis, Nikon 200f2, and many other mildly to crazy expensive lenses sing. Don't own those lenses? Don't waste your money on a D810! Its that simple...Really. When ever I see a nooby with an 810 and a kit lens I throw up in my mouth a bit...Its like leaving a Ferrari in reverse and driving around town...Everybody that knows anything knows you are a poser ......Could have had a Dx with some amazing lenses creating and capturing amazing moments....maybe event bought some lights! Instead you make shitty flat snapshots...expensive snapshots! Trust me on this: A shit lens is shit no matter what. Glass matters! Light matters! The camera body is a fking hammer
+Smokin07ram Right on the spot Man! I worked 15 years as photojournalist in newspaper in analog time from Fm2,F3,F90,F90x,F5, and then came digital time, and newspaper died due to economical crisis. After years I came back with D70s, then D90 and D7100 but nowadays work only for myself. Portrait, wedding, story, Industry photography, - camera is a tool and lenses is a heart. I saw so, so many posers with D810 and lenses with f stop 3.5-5.6- which could be great for studio work, but outside those cheaper lenses doesn't have enough quality to bring all details to big sensor of 810. I still have all D lenses 24/2.8,35/2,50/1.4,180/2.8,80-200/2.8, 28-105 (3,5-5,6D), and sigma 15/2.8 which all do the job with DX sensor. Finally someone; - Ken and you pointed out importance of the fact that glass stays, and body's sell. I like these channel because Ken pointed out really logically what is important in gear and what is not. Yes I would like try again a beast like D4s,+ 70-200 or 200/2 but only for sport assigment. But few months back I worked with D7100+80-200 covering national Kendo (Japanese swordsmanship competition). So I put 7100 from 24 MP to smaller field of 15MP, and got fast exposure, big enaugh for web, and decent print up to A3 (I believe 16Inches). With lower end D90, 12MP I made 80 by 150 cm, poster for the door. Life size portrait and people did not believed that was done with 12MP. With a today's price of 7100 it is really a flagship for me.Thanks Ken and Smokin07ram
How is the 24-70 on the DX bodies? Was going to buy a 24-70 f/2.8 for my 5200 (soon to be a 7200) but can't decide if I want that or the equivalent being a 17-55 2.8. Any thoughts? I also have a 70-300 4.5-5.6.
i just bought one in August 2019 and I am thrilled about my decision. Much appreciated and so glad I watched this video. I like that you are yourself, thank you
@@DivisionStreetDrums Coo. I've read a little bit about the Olympus line of cameras. What's your take on them? I mostly do video but also like photos as well.
Hai man just subscribed, was thinking to shift to FX but after your videos i stoped thinking about it, i own 2 d7100, d300, d200 and tons of dx lenses only (including 2.8 17-55). So thank you for this, you saved me ALOT of money. On top of it considering buying tele lens (have 70-300 VR nikkor) shoul i go for tamron 70-200 or 80-200 nikon for wedings(im against useing tripod) i assume tamron is better? Ty in advance
I have been shooting with my D7100 for about four years. From events to riots it has been a SOLID performer. Yes, the buffer is a drag but you are 100% correct: the number of times I have needed that much buffer in 4 years I can count on one hand. I also shoot with my D800. The images from the D7100 are UNQUESTIONABLY on par with the D800. The only differences are technical and meaningless when it comes to showing the images. I chose the D7100 over the D700 because I for sure need video and still do. BTW: it also shoots AMAZING video!! I am a professional shooter and have ZERO problem reaching for my D7100 for ANYTHING I am shooting. Truth be told..I do take it into “high risk” environments due to its low replacement costs vs my more expensive cameras. Even in 2020...I’d STILL recommend the D7100 over pretty much everything else!! Happy shooting!
@@scottwesterman221 I would strongly suggest you experiment with both the D7100 and the A6000. Why? To see how they operate for you under pressure. Off the top, the A6000 has substantially higher specs but they are also different types of cameras. that said I DO shoot events and have shot ALOT of events with my D7100 and both my clients and I have been consistently pleased with the results. As a practice I deliberately DO NOT shoot weddings. I have not moved to experiment with the A6000 because I have had no justification for it based on my investment in Nikon infrastructure. More recently, I will add, that I have upgraded into shooting with a Leica SL2 and Leica R series lenses.I donthave much of a call for actual autofocus and when I do my Nikon bodies and lenses are more than sufficient to handle those jobs. My practice is to experiment as much as is possible to see how the equipment works in good times and bad times. At your leisure and when you are under pressure. So, good luck in your hunt.
Hi,, is the battery grip on your camera the genuine Nikon one? Do you know if the cheap ebay ones are okay to use? Great videos man. I just ordered a refurb d7100 from ad, my first real camera. Thanks for the tips.
Thank you. I love my D7100. The features and capabilities of this unit are far beyond my skills at this point, so why “upgrade”? In a world where people are calling their cellphones “cameras” and instagram filters “editing”, I’m a relative pro with my gear. I’m a carpenter by trade and own “overpriced” German-made tools and know that you get what you pay for... but it’s taken me 30 years to get my skills up to par with Festool equipment. Point is, skill outweighs pricy gear for most everything. Also... props for acknowledging your Glocks as a defense of plastics. I thought I was the rare Glock/Nikon TOOLS-owner.
THANK YOU! Nikon currently has refurbished D7100 for 550$ or I have found D7200 on some 3rd party sites for 799$, would you still recommend the 7100 for amateur use mostly at weddings and city / beach shots? THANKS AGAIN!!!
I have a D7000 and I love it. Have you used it, and if so, is the D7100 or the D7200 a significant "jump".... The refurb D7100 is very tempting, but I'm not sure I need it. Any suggestions?
I actually got the D7100 today... and it's AWESOME !!! this dude is not lying ! all the pro features of a Fx D810 or any other Fx camera, are on the D7100 and I love it ! I went from a D3300 to the D7100.
I've had the D7100 for over a month now and it is the BEST dslr camera body I have owned. THe image and color quality just blows me away. I especially like using the in camera HDR feature. You cannot go wrong with the D7100
It's 2023, and my Nikon 7100 is still working like new. I have the new mirrorless Nikon full frame and the holy trinity lens. However, the quality pictures from my 7100, I would say, match the images coming from my Z7 and Z9.
I rented the D810 last weekend for a photo shoot and I did like it a lot, but it just wasn't for me. I know you hate the D750, but I wanna bring up some points about it. At least from my point of view. The main reasons I chose it over the D810, or the D610, or whatever other FX camera, are these: 1. I don't need that many megapixels for most of my work. Plus the RAW files from the D810 are freaking huge. 70+ MB each!!! 2. I love the U1 and U2 custom settings (I upgraded from a D7000 so I was used to it and loved having them) and I didn't want the D600/610 because of the oil issue like you said 3. I don't NEED that flip screen but I do find it very convenient for automotive photography. I found myself lying on the ground with the D810, which I don't mind, but I prefer not getting my clothes dirty if I don't have to. Plus the flip screen is really not that fragile at all. As long as you're not throwing the camera around like a maniac. 4. I can be at a car show for hours at a time in the sun walking around so a lighter camera is a plus. Anyway, some people may not agree with me, but if you wanna upgrade to an FX camera, from the D7000 specifically and you loved it, the clear choice to me is the D750. It's pretty much everything I loved about the D7000 with the full frame sensor, better low light capabilities, better wide-angle choices. And without any major issues. I bought the D750 when it first came out and I RARELY had that flare issue. I still sent it in for service though since it was free.
ALL YOU SAY BEGS for the video im uploading NOW It just "BEGS" for it........ its uploading now and the title is:::: The Angry Photographer: The BEST NIKON DSLR MADE. Nikon Secrets to save you $$ Ill wait for you to see it and make a conclusion on it.
I agree with most of your videos and points except this one. Camera with flippy screens being 'fragile' is bullshit. I've worked in camera store for the past 7 years (and still am) we sell crap tons of canons and video camcorders and newer nikon flippy screen models. We even have pentax KS2 arriving next month. All this time we have not received a single complain or repair unit for broken flippy screens. Not even ONE out of hundreds of 600D/650D/60D/70D D5300 units sold. After talking to guys from other shops, its the same case. They received more repair units for non functional fixed screen than non functional flippy screen for that matter.
Hi, I am shopping for a Nikon D7200 dslr, and found two deals, and would like to know what is your opinion, please. Nikon USA refurbished vs New grey market. Considering that they are the same price, which one would you buy? Thanks a lot!
Just stepped up from a D5000 to get this camera, refurbed, for $499 with 56 shutter actuations from a large new York online dealer.. I love it, lots to learn for me as I've only been shooting with a DSLR for 3 years. I also enjoy your videos. They're really informative for me. I'm on a budget and cant afford $2000 lenses. Plus I laugh my ass off at your "matter of fact" approach to these videos,. You're hilarious and sarcastic and you know your shit. So thanks. I appreciate your stuff.
+Michael Mcgraw awesome sauce!!!!!!!! behind the crazy, is all logic and rational objective conclusions D7100 has 95% of what my $3000 D810 has :) got 2 of em :)
Hi there. I am looking for a good system for under $1200 Canadian. I have had a D300 in the past and will probably purchase one of these again. Please suggest a better option in camera body and maybe 3 or 4 lenses. I don't have a problem with manual focus lenses either. Not interested in wildlife photography. Thanks.
Jumping ship from canon. Can’t afford the D500 and glass. Thinking of this D7100 and Tamron 100-400 for wildlife. What do you think? I find value in your videos thank you.
Same here, I just upgraded from D3300 to D7100 after watching this video. Initially I taught of upgrading to D7200 but now I am very happy with the results from D7100
Hi man, thanks for the vid, but how about shooters of concerts in very bad light? Is not there FX sure choice for high iso and low noice stuff? Planned to upgrade to FX 750 next year from D7000. Thx for the answer.
I'm thinking of upgrading my camera. Can you give me a suggestion which one to buy? Nikon D7200 or D610? or a Canon 70D? I currently have a Nikon D3200 with 50mm F1.8G. Thanks.
Personally, I'm a macro user(dental photography) and currently using my d90 with Sigma 70mm and 105mm lenses. What you think about switching to d7100( obivously a it's a brilliant idea), in a matter of fact that I have some future plans for teaching and running courses? I'm concerned would be good enough to present my photos on big wide projector screens?
Im looking to get a refurbed D7100 from either B&H or Adorama. Do you know if they are gray market and will Nikon repair these if something goes wronge. after the 30 or 90 days they give you..
they are NOT grey market, and they are NIKON factory certified and warranty FROM NIKON! after 90 days its, "all you", thats what you need a ($20 a year!) personal articles policy from your insurance agent. 90 days is all you need anyway, anything can go at any time. Thats what youre saving $300 on , $300 more, you can get a new one with a 1 year warr. do you NEED that? 99% of the time,NO........there is that 1%, but screw it , ......nobody gambles on 1% but thats life!!
I'm making the same decision on going 7100 over the 7200, where did you buy your refirb 7100? I'm about to buy one directly from Nikon USA for 599 but sounds like everyone is getting them cheaper elsewhere. looks like you bought one 4 months ago, how much did you have to pay?
Hey, Ken, this is Robyn... Do you recommend a monopod or a tripod for starters on my Nikon D7100. I've been shooting birds, but the cheapie/lightweight Targus tripod, is probably dangerous. I think the camera is too heavy for it. Suggestions on which way to go? I like the idea of the monopod, but then, the tripod has advantages too for moon shots, etc. And, what brands do you recommend? I searched for a video from you, saw the one from how to use a tripod, but but not a recommendation for a tripod. Did I miss it?
Thank you angry :) i was thinking to Upgrade from my d3300 to the d5500. But you convinsed me to just stick with my little toy until i can afford the d7200.
Indeed, stay with your d3300 first and save up for the 7200.. I had interest in the 7200 but was still browsing the net and drooling over all the full frame models which I don't actually need. As it turns out, I've just upgraded from my D5000 to an excellent condition 2nd hand D7200 and I can't be happier. It is truly a DX beast
Mr. Angry, You have good points, but they could be explained in two minutes - not 27 minutes! Why all that talking? Do you just love to hear yoor own voice so much? D7100 may be great for must peoble, yes - but for shooting action and birds it is just useless with that small buffer. My 12mp D300 with a good framerate and buffer is far better for action (lots of pixels dont save you every time) or simply change to Canon 7DII - I am really thinking about doing it in cropchoice. My FX is a 12mp D700 (still a great camera), and it works great with AF-S 24-70 for most work - but I must admit that a D800E could be great for some of my shooting (sometimes I hate to live on a small budget). My point must be that old gear can be great - and it cost nothing compared to newest models.
i agree, this is true? WHY? PTSD, a life of pain, slightly crazy, ......take your pick. All or any are valid answers. yes, old gear can (often) is great. I live that motto. Sorry for my SLOW and late reply to you ,but Im on vacation on Sanibel island, and been taking a lot of pics now that my shoot is over, and I only have 3GB per month tethering on data, so I have to answer questions here at the coffee shop !!!
Ive got a TON more videos to crank out when I get back, also Im making a few here on the island but I need a vacation pretty bad! me and my spandex G-string and my Nikon on the beach catching shots (NOT!) ...... shots yes, Gstring NO
god love your candor! I know I likely have G.A.S. I use my Nikon d7000 (with many of your recommended FX lenses) but find it lacking during jr. high / high school (night) sports and other indoor activities/events. Has your opinion on the D750 changed in the past year (particularly in light of the substantial decrease in price) as to whether the D750 would be a worthwhile upgrade (from a D7000) for non-professional, enthusiastic (aspiring, learning) photographer? Don't want to chew on 30-40MB photos coming out of D8XX (not shooting poster-sized landscape) every time I shoot a picture.
I am starting out, and I love your down-to-earth no bullshit reviews. Is the 7100 still he best value? For the money, should I get the 7100? I was considering the d3300, but for a little more hell I dont know.
+Theoria Apophasis Ok I see a refurbished D7100 at ~$675, After that what lens should I use as a beginner (as the body only is creeping on my whole budget)? As my budget is a little tight, which is the best valued DSLR at even lower prices from nikon? Looking forward for your suggestion. Regards, SAM`
Hey Ken! Do you still think that D7100 is a budget king or something changed in year 2016? Got some basic skills and now looking for an upgrade from D5300. Thanks in advance!
I am a Nikon Fan and my top cameras are D300 and D7000. I got great results on Safari with a D100 with 300 f2.8 back in the day. Planning an Antarctica trip. Can you suggest the camera to take to capture the experience please? I was thinking of renting a D810 with the 200-400 f/4. Thanks
+bbtel you need to pack light, and what reliability, and something you can smuggle UNDER your coat WITH a lens, Fuji XT1 and a 27mm lens (and a few other lenses)
This has to be one of the best videos I have seen on UA-cam. At this time I am using a D200, the first DSLR I bought new, and now was looking at the d7100 for the reach I would get with a DX,what is your opinion on high ISO of the 7100 vs FX cameras?
+Theoria Apophasis Yep! And I just bought the D7100 tonight at B&H for $600 (Used like new and very clean) plus an AF-S 85mm 1.8G (New). I was on a low budget, and almost bought a D750. You saved my ass! Thanks a million!!!
+Theoria Apophasis Yeah, portraits and mostly studio lighting. I was gonna buy a sigma 70-200mm 2.8, but the guy told me 85mm 1.8G is better. Just something to start with. I can always use the D7100 as backup when I upgrade. I also heard it's good for time-lapse. What lens would you recommend for that? Btw I'll send you link to my site once it's setup
EEEEK, not Sick-ma, their quality control sucks, and sample variation is HIGH what KINDA time lapse? citty and landscape???? 35mm F2 D AF Nikkor only $160+ minty used Ebay :) thanks
I still use my D7100 professionally almost everyday. I love it! I also have a D750 I shoot low light concerts, weddings, etc. with and I love it. The only reason I got the 750 is because a got it from a kid who got his set up with daddies money who was selling his gear cheap and I got the D750 for $150. I couldn't pass it up.
Ok. First of all, I need to thank you. I watched this video about 4-5 times when I was planning to buy my next system for professional headshots. I was considering full frame and even other brands. Your video made me ask myself a lot of questions and the answers I got pointed me towards the D7100 at my local shop. As soon as I picked it up I refused to look at anything else. I ended up getting the grip with it (used, mint) and a Tamron 70-200mm f2.8 lens. I am in love with this camera. It has everything I need and nothing I don't. It outperforms the D7200 and many other systems in low ISO settings (which I almost ALWAYS use) and performs exceptionally well at higher ISO too. It's built like a tank, a little heavy with the grip (which I like) and looks absolutely badass. I swear everytime I take this out of my bag, I smell it, then I kiss it, and only then do I start shooting. It is a ritual I have been practicing since I got it and I am hard pressed to think about how I will ever use a different system in the near future. Thank you for helping to open my eyes and see this camera for the amazing piece of engineering it is. I saved a shitload of money (which I invested into glass) and I could NOT BE HAPPIER.
I got a used and factory cleaned D600 for about $600. The shutter got replaced too. So far i am very happy with the results I get. Sharp, great color and it does well at low iso. After 6.000 shots I have not seen a single oil spot. Maybe I am just lucky, but this body works well for me. But like everyone knows, in photography its not about the gear, its about the photographer. I am still curious, if I should get a D7100 for wildlife and macro.
Would the D7100 still be worth upgrading to currently? I use a D3300, I don't want to spend more than £600 and I could get an old full frame, but I don't have enough money for full frame lenses, so I'm thinking D7100.
Awesome video man!! Classic! I was thinking that getting a 810 would give me better clarity/less noise in low light/astro shots and better prints, would money invested in glass be a better option to bring me closer to where I want my print quality to be with less outlay? Or would the 810 give more of a dramatic improvement than what I can get with glass alone?
This is gold. And I'm not just saying that because I bought the D7100! I didn't just buy the D7100 for no reason, though; I thought long and hard and came to the same conclusions - so I'm glad someone agrees :) And I couldn't agree more that more people in my position (i.e. been shooting for years, but hardly pros) should appreciate that its our eyes - and not our gear - that holds us back most of the time.
Heeyyy!!!! ive been slapping the shit out of my D7100 at the beach today (meaning a lot of shooting) ..... Sorry for my SLOW and late reply to you ,but Im on vacation on Sanibel island, and been taking a lot of pics now that my shoot is over, and I only have 3GB per month tethering on data, so I have to answer questions here at the coffee shop !!!
Ive got a TON more videos to crank out when I get back, also Im making a few here on the island but I need a vacation pretty bad! me and my spandex G-string and my Nikon on the beach catching shots (NOT!) ...... shots yes, Gstring NO
I love my D800e and use it for event, family and portrait photography. Your thoughts on pairing a d7100 with it for both backup and extra reach (both using my FX lenses)? Thanks!
I have a D750 and a D7200... One thing you forget to mention is the AF system on the D750 has the facial 3D tracking and always focuses on the nearest eye (which makes grab shots of people at events like weddings easier), whereas my D7200 does not. The D7200 will just pick the nearest thing and focus like Canon. This is fine if you just use the center focus and recompose, but time is money. And why have a flippy screen? Not just for video! I often take product photos with manual focus lenses and have the camera in an awkward position for looking through the viewfinder... I prefer to flip the screen, use liveview, zoom in and manually focus. I also do real estate and architecture photography, and there is nothing as wide as the FX 14-24/2.8 lens in DX unless I get a junky Sigma 8-16mm (ever millimeter counts on the wide end)... Also I use the flip screen for real estate photos when shooting at low levels on a tripod where I don't want to lay down on the floor or get on my knees to peer through the finder. I guess your point of view is based on only portrait photography under controlled conditions or for family grab shots or wildlife (maybe sports). You don't consider little things like the AF 3D facial tracking is useful, or that people use their cameras in awkward positions where the flip screen helps a lot. I guess in theory, I could use the wifi on my D7200 for product photos and real estate... But that is adding another step, adding lag, and wasting time. I only bought the D7200 as a backup to my D750 in case it shits out on me during a job and I have no choice. And I carry it for family photos when I just bring the D7200 and 18-200 in my bag for the day. But in your point of view, I should use the D7200 (or D7100) for everything, even though the 10-24mm has loads of distortion at 10-16mm, and 10 isn't wide enough for tiny interiors, especially when I need to do distortion correction or crop out the distortion. I also do portraiture with my D750 and 85/1.4G and 135/2DC, The 3D facial recognition focus always locks on the nearest eye, even at wide open aperture. The D7200 does not. I tried to use the D7200 with these lenses under the same conditions, I always need to use center focus only, focus on the eye and recompose. Sometimes the subject has already moved an inch back or forward and throws off the shot. So again, why is the D7100/D7200 better than the D750? For sports? For birds? Buildings and products are suited for the wider full frame angles and the flip screen in awkward situations. And for portraits and people photos at live events where you don't have time to focus and recompose, the D750 still wins. As for image quality? Its the same on my screen and in prints. DX without AA filter vs FX with AA filter, sharpness and details look about the same (provided you're in perfect focus and on a tripod). 24MP on DX is more forgiving for slight focus errors or motion blur, a dense sensor like 24MP on DX is not forgiving at all. People who use the D810 or Canon 5DSR are noticing that more densely packed pixels is making their images less sharp from motion blur or fractional focusing errors.
I have a D7000... almost worn all of the paint off the buttons and love it. Is there a notable difference between the D7100 and my beloved D7000, or just wait till I wear out the shutter?
I have a d7000 with battery grip and I was wondering if you would recommend selling it to buy a d7100 with battery grip. Thanks. Ps just bought a pancake 50mm and a 200mm f/4 because of your recommendations. Look forward to playing with them.
if you have a D7000 already, the only thing i would sell it for (if you feel you must upgrade), would be to get a D800e for $1300+ The LOSS youd incur in selling your D7000 and the GAIN youd get in the D7100 isnt enough to rationally justify same! pancake 50mm is a dreamboat skinny girl lens with 0 distortion all the way open. and CHEAP 200mm F4 is a TANK lens, youll utterly love it, 2 great lenses for the cost of dirt that are worth far far far MORE than they cost.
Can you help me please? I wanted a camera for vlogging and to learn to take quality still shots. Stealing my husband's lenses is important to me. Everyone (photography friends, family and store clerks in another state) told me to get the D7200 last year. I have video focusing problems and battery life that lasts an afternoon. Would you recommend staying with the D7200 or is there a better choice that we missed? If it makes a difference, wifi is not a selling point for me.
Thanks, great info! I have a have a set of AI, AIS and AF-D lenses and been considering a D7100. D7200 or D600 for stills I got rid of a 5D MkII and went to M 4/3" cameras for video a few years ago, and have been using some decent Leica and the old Nikkors on them and getting respectable results, and wondering if either the D7100 or D600 would be worth switching for stills? Some Nikon geeks are saying without an AA filter, the 7200 is a better performer?
thank you for your advies.You were right .I just bought last week the D7100,Its just unbelieveble what this camera gives you .the sharpness is mindblowing.
It 2020 and I just bought a used D7100 and love it. I almost thought about upgrading to a D7200 in order to get a larger buffer for more fps until I saw what you had to say and until I put an Extreme Pro 170mb/s SD card it. My D7100 shots very fast with minor pauses between shots. I'll stay with my D7100 thanks!
Yessss! I managed to snag a Nikon D7100 refurb from Adorama today (4/24/2015) for $699! Added a refurbed 18-140mm and cheap Tiffen filter (for now) for $299. Can't wait to get it to replace my Sony RX10. Thanks for your advice....
Based on your recommendations I upgraded and just bought the d7100 body and the 50mm ais and 60mm 2.8D and so glad I did!! I had a d3200 and kit lens for a few years and am blown away by the performance of these older lenses. Thanks for your work, appreciate it!
Hi angry photographer.. someone once told me that the best way to determine which camera system to buy into, is by determining the lens that you want to use. I am quite keen on getting into landscape photography and am in love with the results that I'm seeing from the Nikon 14-24mm f2.8 lens. Does the DX format and particularly the d7100 have a lens thatv will give me the same focal length at the widest end (14mm) with picture quality that is tack sharp throughout the entire focal range; edge to center?
Totally agree with everything you're saying. I had the D7100 and loved it. Just wondering though, when comparing to the full frame, wouldn't it have more noise per pixel at higher ISO than say a D810?
Hey wich 3-4 Lens you would advice for a d7100? Currently i am seeting a replacement for the Tamron 17-50 2.8 and something wider, was thinking about getting the 15-30 2.8 Tamron and the 24-70 VC Tamron or the Nikon 24-70. Also got a 70-200 2.8 Sigma OS ( Not the best but when budget comes i will upgrade to a Nikon one). And for Makro the 105mm 2.8 VR is in the Pocket also. i think whith the 15-30 and 24-70 as an addition to the other glass i got i think i can almost shoot everything or?
+Theoria Apophasis oh and for the Midrange as 24-70 what would you advice there? On the more Tele Side i am good just want to improve the Wide Angle Lenses. Also get rid of the 17-50 2.8 Tamron i am not happy with.
I have a D7100 and like it. but it causes the problem. How can I fix / avoid a flare / ghost images caused from long exposure because the sensor couldn't handle it? Thanks.
the 24-120 is a TOTAL PILE OF POO, ...an amazing number agree on this fact, myself included. Its CRAP. The 24-70 2.8 (currently i own one) is a dreamboat, however. shes very fast AF shes RATHER FRAGILE, and easy to break shes not EXTREMELY SHARP at any focal. shes very expensive.
Theoria Apophasis I saw your video telling 24-70 is sharp at 24 and 50, How do you compare it with the prime 24 and 50? how about at 70? I'm really planning to buy one, and thanks by the way I have learn a lot from your videos.
nothing is going to beat a 50mm prime, 24-70 has a few issues. its "very" fragile, and likewise not VERY sharp at 2.8 at ANY range. likewise even at F4 across the board, there are plenty more sharp at every focal. that being said, its a priceless lens with great value, however its the "worst" of the Nikon Trinity of 14-24 , 24-70 , and 70-200 all in 2.8
I understand your point. But in what aspects is the D800e superior to the D610(I was thinking about buying a d610)? I want the best high ISO, night photography performer FX camera in this price range. Please help, don't know what to choose
It would be too expensive for me. Full frame only second hand I can afford. $700-$800 is my limit. Around this price I have found the D600, D610 or the D800e second hand in my country. Or, if you know another model in this price range...
edgenike D7100 is best value, you can get a mint as new used one for $650 nothing comes closer, and the D7200 doesnt perform as well in low ISO shadow detail, however it does have a larger buffer.
Thank you, thank you, thank you Angry Photographer for setting me straight with this. Have been thinking about buying a D750 as an upgrade to my D7100 and despite doing a lot of research no one pointed out just how great the D7100 is compared to the mid level FXs and that I don't really need an FX camera for the photography I do. Instead I'm going to spend the money on some of the great lenses you recommend in your other videos.
if you want a second BEATER camera, get a D700 FX for $700 ! the D700 FX is a far superior build camera and tool than the D750 is. Ignore the pixel peepers bitching about 12.1MP D700, nonsense, I make perfect 20x30 prints with a D700 yes yes , glass is important. Glad you didnt waste your money. winks.
Hello Angry, recently dropped my 7100 and I'm using it as an excuse to upgrade, the thing still works despite having a crack in it the size of my arse. Yes I've watched your video but I wonder if for me FX would be best. I like taking night shots, night time landscapes and I've been under the impression the FX sensors will offer less noise. Thoughts? Also, where do you recommend buying cameras used?
Hello Ken. Hope you are great when my message finds you. I am going to get my first DSLR and my budget is around 40k INR (~620$). As per your suggestion D7100 is going out of my budget (as it cost around 70k INR ~1100$ for body only). In range of my budget I am getting the below deals (all are new products): 1. D5300 with 18-140mm VR nikkor kit lens - 50k INR (~750$) 2. D5300 with 18-55mm VR nikkor kit lens - 40k INR (~620$) 3. D5300 body only - 36k INR (~550$) [If I go with that can I begin with a 35mm 1.8 prime lens (another 10k INR) - will it suffice all my curiosity or as a beginner I should stick to a zoom lens?] Looking forward for your suggestions. Regards, Sam
ive been shooting for 20 plus years, right now i am shooting with the D7100 and D750, i use my D7100 99% of the time, with 24MP i'm just fine, for the money its hands down one of the best cameras for me, I shoot fashion, and editorial and just about everything else with it and i do this for a living!
In a two week span, I went from a D3200 to a D3300. I then saw the D7100 on sale (body), and I jumped on it after a friend of mine spoke extremely highly about it. I was initially intimidated by the D7100, but I watched your D7100 tips video and it sure helped a brother out. lol I am only using the Nikon 35mm 1.8 lens. What would you recommend as second lens? I want something with some distance. Thanks.
+Jose Betancourt for what use and budget? 2 most important lenses are a great wide zoom and intermediate zoom and also a few nice prime lenses. 24-85 VR G Nikkor $220 used minty ebay Tokina 11-16 most awesome cheap useful lens would be the 60mm 2.8 D Nikkor which is also $200+ minty used ebay, see my video on that lens. :)
What do you recommend for upgrade from the d5300, i bought it last year, but i am looking to go to a full frame, and ofc id want it to last for at least the up comming 4 years. I was always in love with the d7000 series.....but now i am in full doubt as to what to get next. I am in photography and filming, i wanna do both so DSLR Full frame i am aiming for, what is your advice ?
Theoria Apophasis My budget is in euro, for now im planning up to 1000 euro minimum. My glasses are nikkor 50mm 1.8g and the nikon kit lens 18-55mm 3.5 VR2 (this is my 2nd account)
Got the D7100 a few months back independent on this video and also I got the 12-24 DX lens in the mail today and you confirmed my choice on both of them :) Can't wait to try it out tomorrow. What telephoto lens would you recommend? I'm looking at the 70-200..
Jim Holecek AWESOME!!! how you loving that combo!!!! ahhh, easy answer, get the FX 70-300 VR lens (ONLY THE VR!!!), not because it has VR, but because its a superior lens. also it has DAMN FAST AF. that lens is $300+ minty used Ebay
Thanks for the fast answer. I have yet to try it out.. I'm going to New Zealand in 2 days time, so I guess it will have it's premier over there. But I just love the D7100. My first lens was the prime 50mm FX 1.8 and I can't say enough good things about that one. But I'm a newbie in photography, so what do I know, right? I'll keep an eye on the 70-300 VR. Once again thank you for your advice.
youre rocking on the perfect "team" there of camera and lenses. Nikon is full of CRAP to call the D7100 an "advanced amateur" camera, ....its ALL PRO My pair of $3000 D810 cant do 3% more than the D7100 can
Still rocking my D7100 in 2024,purchased new in 2013. Think it’s feature set still viable and can accommodate multiple lenses which in today second hard market pricing is very attractive.
DSLRs peaked in the 2010s tbh. I got my D810 in 2014 and it's still more than enough for anything I want to shoot and will be until it breaks, hopefully not for another decade. Modern cameras have slightly better AF, slightly better DR, little QOL features, but light hasn't changed, older cameras are still going to perform fundamentally the same as they did when they came out.
@@WyattFredaCowie
Excellent comment/advice. I’ve had a D7000 for years and it serves my needs perfectly well. However, I was offered a D810 with fewer than 3000 actuations, virtually new condition and for an incredibly low price. I’m still trying to find out what’s wrong with it!
Nice, I just bought mine used and it gets dilivered tomorrow
@@RobVI
That’s great! I hope you really enjoy it. It’ll encourage you to take your photography even further.
my dad bought a new one so he gave his old d710p to me a few weeks ago. i just started photography and so far i think it works pretty well. 😀😀
I love his videos. He starts off so easily and 3 minutes into the video the angry photographer kicks in. Hahaha. You're amazing!!! :D
If you take any advice from this angry fella, it should be this. Reality check, unless you are pulling in a full time income from photography, or have tons of cash to blow...you dont need the "professional" equipment. Get LAST YEARS PRO GEAR. Get the gear they are selling for discounts now that they are trading up. They made that gear work and if you practice enough you can too.
Alysuis True. He was right that a pro could use just about any camera and get better results than most amateur photographers. I know any of the full frame cameras are great, but still getting great shots in a APS-C sensor, plus more telephoto range on the full frame lenses, is a bargain.
Heck, I am a full time professional photographer and the only equipment I EVER buy is last year’s or the year before equipment.
Sure, some things are better on some of the new equipment but to me they are not worth $3000+ more to get right now.
You are absolutely right, its June 2024 and I just bought a D850 for a song and a dance, its the way I can afford professional equipment.
I am a retired professional portrait photographer. You are right spot on!!! I bought a D7100 and absolutely LOVE IT. Spent some money on GLASS. You tell 'em like it is. You are refreshing.
Didn't you listen? He said the best thing about the D7200 is it will reduce the price of the D7100
Hi My nasty Friend, this is still my favorite of all your Videos. As a Pro shooter for over 40 Years I have counted on you for 90% of my gear needs reviews. I love the straight talk, the Bad words we all use and your candor in general. I now Shoot Fuji XH1, XT2 and my First XT1 I will never sell. I have gone thru 3 D7100 for Pro Work since it came out Bravo! Your the Man. Thanks.
You are hilarious. I just ordered a 7100 and I am so glad I watched this. I was feeling bad I can't afford full frame, but now I feel so much better!
Best damned advice ever!
I am a professional Photographer.
Nikons I own: D7000, 7100, 7200, 700, 750, 800, 800E, 810, D3, D3s, D3x, D4, and D4s.
Multiples of most and I own a lot of older bodies...that aren't relevant so they are not listed.
My preferences are the D7200 (I shoot very quickly and choke the D7100..You wont have that problem)
Give me a D7000-7200 and a 85 1.8 and I am making Money! At a 24-70 and 70-200 f2.8 and I can shoot anything that needs shooting. I have not directly compared the D7100, but the D7200 destroys my D4 in auto focus (nobody wants to hear this)....Probably my D4s as well....Its that good
The D7200 gives up a tiny bit of quality at ISO 100-1000 to the D7100...I am not a pixel peeper so I could care less.
Resolution is not a problem nor is printing billboards.....Despite what the "experts" tell you.
For me the only FX bodies I am thrilled with are the D810 and my beloved D700's.
The 700s because ....we have history together!
The D810 because it makes my 85 1.4 Zeiss Otis, Nikon 200f2, and many other mildly to crazy expensive lenses sing.
Don't own those lenses? Don't waste your money on a D810!
Its that simple...Really.
When ever I see a nooby with an 810 and a kit lens I throw up in my mouth a bit...Its like leaving a Ferrari in reverse and driving around town...Everybody that knows anything knows you are a poser ......Could have had a Dx with some amazing lenses creating and capturing amazing moments....maybe event bought some lights!
Instead you make shitty flat snapshots...expensive snapshots!
Trust me on this: A shit lens is shit no matter what.
Glass matters!
Light matters!
The camera body is a fking hammer
+Smokin07ram
Right on the spot Man! I worked 15 years as photojournalist in newspaper in analog time from
Fm2,F3,F90,F90x,F5, and then came digital time, and newspaper died due to economical crisis. After years I came back with D70s, then D90 and D7100 but nowadays work only for myself. Portrait, wedding, story,
Industry photography, - camera is a tool and lenses is a heart. I saw so, so many posers with D810 and lenses with f stop 3.5-5.6- which could be great for studio work, but outside those cheaper lenses doesn't have
enough quality to bring all details to big sensor of 810. I still have all D lenses 24/2.8,35/2,50/1.4,180/2.8,80-200/2.8, 28-105 (3,5-5,6D), and sigma 15/2.8 which all do the job with DX sensor. Finally someone; - Ken
and you pointed out importance of the fact that glass stays, and body's sell. I like these channel because Ken pointed out really logically what is important in gear and what is not. Yes I would like try again a beast like D4s,+ 70-200 or 200/2 but only for sport assigment. But few months back I worked with D7100+80-200 covering national Kendo (Japanese swordsmanship competition). So I put 7100 from 24 MP to smaller field of 15MP, and got fast exposure, big enaugh for web, and decent print up to A3 (I believe 16Inches). With lower end D90, 12MP I made 80 by 150 cm, poster for the door. Life size portrait and people did not believed that was done with 12MP. With a today's price of 7100 it is really a flagship for me.Thanks Ken and Smokin07ram
+Smokin07ram Show off
How is the 24-70 on the DX bodies? Was going to buy a 24-70 f/2.8 for my 5200 (soon to be a 7200) but can't decide if I want that or the equivalent being a 17-55 2.8. Any thoughts? I also have a 70-300 4.5-5.6.
D7100 and a Sigma 18-35 f 1.8 is all I need in life.
SOLD! It’s October 2019 and I’m still buying a D7100 today! 😂
Same!
just got one myself kickass camera.
@@andredavy1806 Coo, what camera did you have beforehand? I currently have a D5300.
@@boahandarrowsproductions4326 d700 and d5100 now I have 2 d800E and the d7100
@@andredavy1806 Very nice. Do your thing man.
i just bought one in August 2019 and I am thrilled about my decision. Much appreciated and so glad I watched this video. I like that you are yourself, thank you
Coo, what camera did you have beforehand?
@@boahandarrowsproductions4326 I still have MFT Olympus Cameras OMD em5 mki and Mkii
@@DivisionStreetDrums Coo. I've read a little bit about the Olympus line of cameras. What's your take on them? I mostly do video but also like photos as well.
Hai man just subscribed, was thinking to shift to FX but after your videos i stoped thinking about it, i own 2 d7100, d300, d200 and tons of dx lenses only (including 2.8 17-55).
So thank you for this, you saved me ALOT of money.
On top of it considering buying tele lens (have 70-300 VR nikkor) shoul i go for tamron 70-200 or 80-200 nikon for wedings(im against useing tripod) i assume tamron is better?
Ty in advance
70 200 2.8 VC Tamron
+Theoria Apophasis as i tough, will go for that one, cheers m8
I have been shooting with my D7100 for about four years. From events to riots it has been a SOLID performer. Yes, the buffer is a drag but you are 100% correct: the number of times I have needed that much buffer in 4 years I can count on one hand.
I also shoot with my D800. The images from the D7100 are UNQUESTIONABLY on par with the D800. The only differences are technical and meaningless when it comes to showing the images.
I chose the D7100 over the D700 because I for sure need video and still do. BTW: it also shoots AMAZING video!!
I am a professional shooter and have ZERO problem reaching for my D7100 for ANYTHING I am shooting.
Truth be told..I do take it into “high risk” environments due to its low replacement costs vs my more expensive cameras.
Even in 2020...I’d STILL recommend the D7100 over pretty much everything else!!
Happy shooting!
Would you recommend the D7100 over the Sony A6000 mirrorless for getting into weddings/events ? If so why in your opinion
Thanks
@@scottwesterman221 I would strongly suggest you experiment with both the D7100 and the A6000. Why? To see how they operate for you under pressure. Off the top, the A6000 has substantially higher specs but they are also different types of cameras. that said I DO shoot events and have shot ALOT of events with my D7100 and both my clients and I have been consistently pleased with the results. As a practice I deliberately DO NOT shoot weddings. I have not moved to experiment with the A6000 because I have had no justification for it based on my investment in Nikon infrastructure. More recently, I will add, that I have upgraded into shooting with a Leica SL2 and Leica R series lenses.I donthave much of a call for actual autofocus and when I do my Nikon bodies and lenses are more than sufficient to handle those jobs. My practice is to experiment as much as is possible to see how the equipment works in good times and bad times. At your leisure and when you are under pressure. So, good luck in your hunt.
Hi,, is the battery grip on your camera the genuine Nikon one? Do you know if the cheap ebay ones are okay to use? Great videos man. I just ordered a refurb d7100 from ad, my first real camera. Thanks for the tips.
Thank you. I love my D7100. The features and capabilities of this unit are far beyond my skills at this point, so why “upgrade”? In a world where people are calling their cellphones “cameras” and instagram filters “editing”, I’m a relative pro with my gear. I’m a carpenter by trade and own “overpriced” German-made tools and know that you get what you pay for... but it’s taken me 30 years to get my skills up to par with Festool equipment. Point is, skill outweighs pricy gear for most everything.
Also... props for acknowledging your Glocks as a defense of plastics. I thought I was the rare Glock/Nikon TOOLS-owner.
THANK YOU! Nikon currently has refurbished D7100 for 550$ or I have found D7200 on some 3rd party sites for 799$, would you still recommend the 7100 for amateur use mostly at weddings and city / beach shots? THANKS AGAIN!!!
+Eddie Cuza you shoot tons of low light? D7200 is better on same but the 7100 is just as good, also bigger buffer on the D7200
"I will fool you every fucking time!" Best quote ever!
I have a D7000 and I love it.
Have you used it, and if so, is the D7100 or the D7200 a significant "jump"....
The refurb D7100 is very tempting, but I'm not sure I need it. Any suggestions?
Nedzad Cavka D7100 is a good jump yes, but not a tremendous amount.
D7100 is really cheap now, $650 minty factory refurb as-new
tough choice :)
I actually got the D7100 today... and it's AWESOME !!! this dude is not lying ! all the pro features of a Fx D810 or any other Fx camera, are on the D7100 and I love it ! I went from a D3300 to the D7100.
+Andy Salinas damn right :)
dude, This video kick azz man, thanks. quick question, Which camera is your advice for Architectureif i buy refurbished from nikon?
Thanks in advance.
+Chattanooga Real Estate Photography Thank you
I've had the D7100 for over a month now and it is the BEST dslr camera body I have owned. THe image and color quality just blows me away. I especially like using the in camera HDR feature. You cannot go wrong with the D7100
It's 2023, and my Nikon 7100 is still working like new. I have the new mirrorless Nikon full frame and the holy trinity lens. However, the quality pictures from my 7100, I would say, match the images coming from my Z7 and Z9.
Finally, someone who tells it like it is. Priceless man, thank you
How do you feel about the D7100 in 2018?
I use one and with the right glass it's amazing (Nikkor DX 35mm F/1.8 is what I mainly use).
I rented the D810 last weekend for a photo shoot and I did like it a lot, but it just wasn't for me.
I know you hate the D750, but I wanna bring up some points about it. At least from my point of view. The main reasons I chose it over the D810, or the D610, or whatever other FX camera, are these:
1. I don't need that many megapixels for most of my work. Plus the RAW files from the D810 are freaking huge. 70+ MB each!!!
2. I love the U1 and U2 custom settings (I upgraded from a D7000 so I was used to it and loved having them) and I didn't want the D600/610 because of the oil issue like you said
3. I don't NEED that flip screen but I do find it very convenient for automotive photography. I found myself lying on the ground with the D810, which I don't mind, but I prefer not getting my clothes dirty if I don't have to. Plus the flip screen is really not that fragile at all. As long as you're not throwing the camera around like a maniac.
4. I can be at a car show for hours at a time in the sun walking around so a lighter camera is a plus.
Anyway, some people may not agree with me, but if you wanna upgrade to an FX camera, from the D7000 specifically and you loved it, the clear choice to me is the D750. It's pretty much everything I loved about the D7000 with the full frame sensor, better low light capabilities, better wide-angle choices. And without any major issues. I bought the D750 when it first came out and I RARELY had that flare issue. I still sent it in for service though since it was free.
ALL YOU SAY BEGS for the video im uploading NOW
It just "BEGS" for it........ its uploading now and the title is::::
The Angry Photographer: The BEST NIKON DSLR MADE. Nikon Secrets to save you $$
Ill wait for you to see it and make a conclusion on it.
you might very well change your mind on the D750 as per the next video. If not, thats ok !!!
its all about making an INFORMED CHOICE for YOU!
winks**
I had a 7100, that is a badass camera.Now I have D750 which I love too.To me it feels like a 7100 just FX.But to each his own:)
Ive got no issues with the D750, however i prefer HEAVY cameras, and im "not fond" of its absurdly high price.
either way :)
I agree with most of your videos and points except this one. Camera with flippy screens being 'fragile' is bullshit. I've worked in camera store for the past 7 years (and still am) we sell crap tons of canons and video camcorders and newer nikon flippy screen models. We even have pentax KS2 arriving next month. All this time we have not received a single complain or repair unit for broken flippy screens. Not even ONE out of hundreds of 600D/650D/60D/70D D5300 units sold. After talking to guys from other shops, its the same case. They received more repair units for non functional fixed screen than non functional flippy screen for that matter.
Hi, I am shopping for a Nikon D7200 dslr, and found two deals, and would like to know what is your opinion, please.
Nikon USA refurbished vs New grey market. Considering that they are the same price, which one would you buy? Thanks a lot!
Just stepped up from a D5000 to get this camera, refurbed, for $499 with 56 shutter actuations from a large new York online dealer.. I love it, lots to learn for me as I've only been shooting with a DSLR for 3 years.
I also enjoy your videos. They're really informative for me. I'm on a budget and cant afford $2000 lenses. Plus I laugh my ass off at your "matter of fact" approach to these videos,. You're hilarious and sarcastic and you know your shit. So thanks. I appreciate your stuff.
+Michael Mcgraw awesome sauce!!!!!!!!
behind the crazy, is all logic and rational objective conclusions
D7100 has 95% of what my $3000 D810 has :)
got 2 of em :)
Hi there. I am looking for a good system for under $1200 Canadian. I have had a D300 in the past and will probably purchase one of these again. Please suggest a better option in camera body and maybe 3 or 4 lenses. I don't have a problem with manual focus lenses either. Not interested in wildlife photography. Thanks.
I was already set on getting the D7000 for $500.. But after watching this I'm torn. You think I should get the D7100 for $150 more?
+Mario Vinzencio Epino Get the 7100. It is much better.
+Mario Vinzencio Epino
yes, no question
I got my D7100 for $489 on Amazon about a month ago
+Mario Epino Don'T be a woz , get the D5
d7100 is worth $150 more
Jumping ship from canon. Can’t afford the D500 and glass. Thinking of this D7100 and Tamron 100-400 for wildlife. What do you think? I find value in your videos thank you.
you're a fucking character man! smart dude and you know your shit too. thanks for sharing your knoledge with us.
Same here, I just upgraded from D3300 to D7100 after watching this video. Initially I taught of upgrading to D7200 but now I am very happy with the results from D7100
The 7100 is a solid backup.......for my 750 :)
As much as I hate to admit it, I've used the flippy screen numerous times for macro.
Hi man, thanks for the vid, but how about shooters of concerts in very bad light? Is not there FX sure choice for high iso and low noice stuff? Planned to upgrade to FX 750 next year from D7000. Thx for the answer.
Just love the way you deliver valuable information in the funniest manner ever . Great job sir!
I'm thinking of upgrading my camera. Can you give me a suggestion which one to buy? Nikon D7200 or D610? or a Canon 70D? I currently have a Nikon D3200 with 50mm F1.8G. Thanks.
Rabbi Bienes forget the D610, no way.
whats your budget? If you have $1500, get the D750 :)
I can listen to this all day! Wish i could be there and have a few drinks with you.
ok
here is a question for you d700 vs d7100 which one would you go for if you are a beginner in photography? and why?
thanks
I love my D7100..... and my D850 , but I’m always using my D7100
Personally, I'm a macro user(dental photography) and currently using my d90 with Sigma 70mm and 105mm lenses. What you think about switching to d7100( obivously a it's a brilliant idea), in a matter of fact that I have some future plans for teaching and running courses? I'm concerned would be good enough to present my photos on big wide projector screens?
I like the way he talks. Now that's a review...like a boss! 😎😎😎
Im looking to get a refurbed D7100 from either B&H or Adorama. Do you know if they are gray market and will Nikon repair these if something goes wronge. after the 30 or 90 days they give you..
they are NOT grey market, and they are NIKON factory certified and warranty FROM NIKON!
after 90 days its, "all you", thats what you need a ($20 a year!) personal articles policy from your insurance agent.
90 days is all you need anyway, anything can go at any time.
Thats what youre saving $300 on , $300 more, you can get a new one with a 1 year warr.
do you NEED that? 99% of the time,NO........there is that 1%, but screw it , ......nobody gambles on 1%
but thats life!!
That was an extremely accurate baby impression.
hi i have a d7100 and need a good lense i can use for wedding shooting. can you recomend any?
at what budget? :)
I just bought myself a refurbished D7100 over the newer D7200. Well! after listening to you. I certainly make a fucking good decision. Haha!! Tks
I'm making the same decision on going 7100 over the 7200, where did you buy your refirb 7100?
I'm about to buy one directly from Nikon USA for 599 but sounds like everyone is getting them cheaper elsewhere.
looks like you bought one 4 months ago, how much did you have to pay?
Hey, Ken, this is Robyn... Do you recommend a monopod or a tripod for starters on my Nikon D7100. I've been shooting birds, but the cheapie/lightweight Targus tripod, is probably dangerous. I think the camera is too heavy for it. Suggestions on which way to go? I like the idea of the monopod, but then, the tripod has advantages too for moon shots, etc. And, what brands do you recommend? I searched for a video from you, saw the one from how to use a tripod, but but not a recommendation for a tripod. Did I miss it?
+Meadville KOA Campground, Camping, and Cabins Sirui P236
Thank you angry :) i was thinking to Upgrade from my d3300 to the d5500. But you convinsed me to just stick with my little toy until i can afford the d7200.
or d7100 ;)
Indeed, stay with your d3300 first and save up for the 7200.. I had interest in the 7200 but was still browsing the net and drooling over all the full frame models which I don't actually need.
As it turns out, I've just upgraded from my D5000 to an excellent condition 2nd hand D7200 and I can't be happier. It is truly a DX beast
I use a d7000 for concert photography, does the d7100 make a difference.
Or should I invest on better glass ?
better glass.
Mr. Angry, You have good points, but they could be explained in two minutes - not 27 minutes! Why all that talking? Do you just love to hear yoor own voice so much? D7100 may be great for must peoble, yes - but for shooting action and birds it is just useless with that small buffer. My 12mp D300 with a good framerate and buffer is far better for action (lots of pixels dont save you every time) or simply change to Canon 7DII - I am really thinking about doing it in cropchoice. My FX is a 12mp D700 (still a great camera), and it works great with AF-S 24-70 for most work - but I must admit that a D800E could be great for some of my shooting (sometimes I hate to live on a small budget). My point must be that old gear can be great - and it cost nothing compared to newest models.
i agree, this is true? WHY? PTSD, a life of pain, slightly crazy, ......take your pick. All or any are valid answers.
yes, old gear can (often) is great.
I live that motto.
Sorry for my SLOW and late reply to you ,but Im on vacation on Sanibel island, and been taking a lot of pics now that my shoot is over, and I only have 3GB per month tethering on data, so I have to answer questions here at the coffee shop !!!
Ive got a TON more videos to crank out when I get back, also Im making a few here on the island but I need a vacation pretty bad!
me and my spandex G-string and my Nikon on the beach catching shots (NOT!) ...... shots yes, Gstring NO
god love your candor! I know I likely have G.A.S. I use my Nikon d7000 (with many of your recommended FX lenses) but find it lacking during jr. high / high school (night) sports and other indoor activities/events. Has your opinion on the D750 changed in the past year (particularly in light of the substantial decrease in price) as to whether the D750 would be a worthwhile upgrade (from a D7000) for non-professional, enthusiastic (aspiring, learning) photographer? Don't want to chew on 30-40MB photos coming out of D8XX (not shooting poster-sized landscape) every time I shoot a picture.
Funnily enough, it's the same conclusion I've come to when looking for the best price/value point of cameras.
I am starting out, and I love your down-to-earth no bullshit reviews. Is the 7100 still he best value? For the money, should I get the 7100? I was considering the d3300, but for a little more hell I dont know.
+Concord Sage still best value yes, i made a recent video about same. :) now $650 as new Nikon factory D7100
+Theoria Apophasis Ok I see a refurbished D7100 at ~$675, After that what lens should I use as a beginner (as the body only is creeping on my whole budget)?
As my budget is a little tight, which is the best valued DSLR at even lower prices from nikon?
Looking forward for your suggestion.
Regards,
SAM`
thanks so much....the 7100 refurbished. is my new camera.....I'll fund you....darn right. Also a cool dude. Even with the cussing.
well i rarely cuss anymore :P it upsets the braindead sensitive people
I got it.........thanks again.
Hey Ken! Do you still think that D7100 is a budget king or something changed in year 2016? Got some basic skills and now looking for an upgrade from D5300. Thanks in advance!
it still is, D7200 however refurb is incredibly cheap , only $100 more
You had me at Glock Handguns.
I am a Nikon Fan and my top cameras are D300 and D7000. I got great results on Safari with a D100 with 300 f2.8 back in the day. Planning an Antarctica trip. Can you suggest the camera to take to capture the experience please? I was thinking of renting a D810 with the 200-400 f/4. Thanks
+bbtel you need to pack light, and what reliability, and something you can smuggle UNDER your coat WITH a lens,
Fuji XT1 and a 27mm lens (and a few other lenses)
Wish i watched this before purchasing the D5300 ! FML !
Henry Darr me too! I feel the same way.
Henry Darr im looking at my D5300 like...fuck xD
+Henry Darr D3300 here ...
+Pet My Bear OMG SAME Here haha I am getting a new camera haha
+Henry Darr i'd had both and the d5300 is not a a bad camera, it can take amazing pictures, but i would agree that the d7100 is a step up.
This has to be one of the best videos I have seen on UA-cam. At this time I am using a D200, the first DSLR I bought new, and now was looking at the d7100 for the reach I would get with a DX,what is your opinion on high ISO of the 7100 vs FX cameras?
Muahahahahah!!!!! Canon sh*t......feels like lego assembled it! LOL
Thanks for this review man!
+Mike Austin you mean Canon fodder. :)
+Theoria Apophasis Yep! And I just bought the D7100 tonight at B&H for $600 (Used like new and very clean) plus an AF-S 85mm 1.8G (New). I was on a low budget, and almost bought a D750. You saved my ass! Thanks a million!!!
ooooooh, hell of a combo :) gonna do portraits ehh?
course you can do much more than that with that lens.
+Theoria Apophasis Yeah, portraits and mostly studio lighting.
I was gonna buy a sigma 70-200mm 2.8, but the guy told me 85mm 1.8G is better. Just something to start with. I can always use the D7100 as backup when I upgrade.
I also heard it's good for time-lapse. What lens would you recommend for that?
Btw I'll send you link to my site once it's setup
EEEEK, not Sick-ma, their quality control sucks, and sample variation is HIGH
what KINDA time lapse? citty and landscape???? 35mm F2 D AF Nikkor
only $160+ minty used Ebay :)
thanks
I still use my D7100 professionally almost everyday. I love it! I also have a D750 I shoot low light concerts, weddings, etc. with and I love it. The only reason I got the 750 is because a got it from a kid who got his set up with daddies money who was selling his gear cheap and I got the D750 for $150. I couldn't pass it up.
17:28 LOL
Ok. First of all, I need to thank you. I watched this video about 4-5 times when I was planning to buy my next system for professional headshots. I was considering full frame and even other brands. Your video made me ask myself a lot of questions and the answers I got pointed me towards the D7100 at my local shop. As soon as I picked it up I refused to look at anything else. I ended up getting the grip with it (used, mint) and a Tamron 70-200mm f2.8 lens. I am in love with this camera. It has everything I need and nothing I don't. It outperforms the D7200 and many other systems in low ISO settings (which I almost ALWAYS use) and performs exceptionally well at higher ISO too. It's built like a tank, a little heavy with the grip (which I like) and looks absolutely badass. I swear everytime I take this out of my bag, I smell it, then I kiss it, and only then do I start shooting. It is a ritual I have been practicing since I got it and I am hard pressed to think about how I will ever use a different system in the near future. Thank you for helping to open my eyes and see this camera for the amazing piece of engineering it is. I saved a shitload of money (which I invested into glass) and I could NOT BE HAPPIER.
I got a used and factory cleaned D600 for about $600. The shutter got replaced too. So far i am very happy with the results I get. Sharp, great color and it does well at low iso. After 6.000 shots I have not seen a single oil spot. Maybe I am just lucky, but this body works well for me. But like everyone knows, in photography its not about the gear, its about the photographer. I am still curious, if I should get a D7100 for wildlife and macro.
awesome vid!!
how does the d7100 and d7200 stack up against d500 which some are touting as the king dx body?
ive got a paid of D500, its king for sure
the fastest, best in low light/ high ISO
Would the D7100 still be worth upgrading to currently? I use a D3300, I don't want to spend more than £600 and I could get an old full frame, but I don't have enough money for full frame lenses, so I'm thinking D7100.
Awesome video man!! Classic! I was thinking that getting a 810 would give me better clarity/less noise in low light/astro shots and better prints, would money invested in glass be a better option to bring me closer to where I want my print quality to be with less outlay? Or would the 810 give more of a dramatic improvement than what I can get with glass alone?
+ShmickImages better low light is the D750
more resolution and cropping capacity is the D810 , yes.
This is gold. And I'm not just saying that because I bought the D7100!
I didn't just buy the D7100 for no reason, though; I thought long and hard and came to the same conclusions - so I'm glad someone agrees :)
And I couldn't agree more that more people in my position (i.e. been shooting for years, but hardly pros) should appreciate that its our eyes - and not our gear - that holds us back most of the time.
Heeyyy!!!!
ive been slapping the shit out of my D7100 at the beach today (meaning a lot of shooting) .....
Sorry for my SLOW and late reply to you ,but Im on vacation on Sanibel island, and been taking a lot of pics now that my shoot is over, and I only have 3GB per month tethering on data, so I have to answer questions here at the coffee shop !!!
Ive got a TON more videos to crank out when I get back, also Im making a few here on the island but I need a vacation pretty bad!
me and my spandex G-string and my Nikon on the beach catching shots (NOT!) ...... shots yes, Gstring NO
I love my D800e and use it for event, family and portrait photography. Your thoughts on pairing a d7100 with it for both backup and extra reach (both using my FX lenses)? Thanks!
Sir I wanted to ask that currently there nikon d7500 in the market .what do u think about it .should I buy d7500 or d7100?
@DrakeIsSix great points, totally agree the 71/7200 series Nikon's' are by far the better choice. What a camera.
I have the d300 for like 2 years now I'm thinking of upgrading. Is it worth it to switch to d7100?
thats a big jump, yes, and the D7100 is very very inexpensive right now, its #1 best value
I have a D750 and a D7200... One thing you forget to mention is the AF system on the D750 has the facial 3D tracking and always focuses on the nearest eye (which makes grab shots of people at events like weddings easier), whereas my D7200 does not. The D7200 will just pick the nearest thing and focus like Canon. This is fine if you just use the center focus and recompose, but time is money. And why have a flippy screen? Not just for video! I often take product photos with manual focus lenses and have the camera in an awkward position for looking through the viewfinder... I prefer to flip the screen, use liveview, zoom in and manually focus. I also do real estate and architecture photography, and there is nothing as wide as the FX 14-24/2.8 lens in DX unless I get a junky Sigma 8-16mm (ever millimeter counts on the wide end)... Also I use the flip screen for real estate photos when shooting at low levels on a tripod where I don't want to lay down on the floor or get on my knees to peer through the finder.
I guess your point of view is based on only portrait photography under controlled conditions or for family grab shots or wildlife (maybe sports). You don't consider little things like the AF 3D facial tracking is useful, or that people use their cameras in awkward positions where the flip screen helps a lot. I guess in theory, I could use the wifi on my D7200 for product photos and real estate... But that is adding another step, adding lag, and wasting time. I only bought the D7200 as a backup to my D750 in case it shits out on me during a job and I have no choice. And I carry it for family photos when I just bring the D7200 and 18-200 in my bag for the day. But in your point of view, I should use the D7200 (or D7100) for everything, even though the 10-24mm has loads of distortion at 10-16mm, and 10 isn't wide enough for tiny interiors, especially when I need to do distortion correction or crop out the distortion.
I also do portraiture with my D750 and 85/1.4G and 135/2DC, The 3D facial recognition focus always locks on the nearest eye, even at wide open aperture. The D7200 does not. I tried to use the D7200 with these lenses under the same conditions, I always need to use center focus only, focus on the eye and recompose. Sometimes the subject has already moved an inch back or forward and throws off the shot. So again, why is the D7100/D7200 better than the D750? For sports? For birds? Buildings and products are suited for the wider full frame angles and the flip screen in awkward situations. And for portraits and people photos at live events where you don't have time to focus and recompose, the D750 still wins.
As for image quality? Its the same on my screen and in prints. DX without AA filter vs FX with AA filter, sharpness and details look about the same (provided you're in perfect focus and on a tripod). 24MP on DX is more forgiving for slight focus errors or motion blur, a dense sensor like 24MP on DX is not forgiving at all. People who use the D810 or Canon 5DSR are noticing that more densely packed pixels is making their images less sharp from motion blur or fractional focusing errors.
I have a D7000... almost worn all of the paint off the buttons and love it. Is there a notable difference between the D7100 and my beloved D7000, or just wait till I wear out the shutter?
Id wait till you wore it into the dirt!!! buy more GLASS in the meantime!
Theoria Apophasis awesome thanks man. Watching a couple pieces now. have a great weekend!
ahh!!!! you too, ill be in Key West this weekend on a shoot
I have a d7000 with battery grip and I was wondering if you would recommend selling it to buy a d7100 with battery grip. Thanks. Ps just bought a pancake 50mm and a 200mm f/4 because of your recommendations. Look forward to playing with them.
if you have a D7000 already, the only thing i would sell it for (if you feel you must upgrade), would be to get a D800e for $1300+
The LOSS youd incur in selling your D7000 and the GAIN youd get in the D7100 isnt enough to rationally justify same!
pancake 50mm is a dreamboat skinny girl lens with 0 distortion all the way open.
and CHEAP
200mm F4 is a TANK lens, youll utterly love it, 2 great lenses for the cost of dirt that are worth far far far MORE than they cost.
Theoria Apophasis thanks a lot! I really like the 7000 and wasn't sure if I should upgrade. I can't afford full frame so I'll stick with the 7000.
Can you help me please? I wanted a camera for vlogging and to learn to take quality still shots. Stealing my husband's lenses is important to me. Everyone (photography friends, family and store clerks in another state) told me to get the D7200 last year. I have video focusing problems and battery life that lasts an afternoon. Would you recommend staying with the D7200 or is there a better choice that we missed? If it makes a difference, wifi is not a selling point for me.
for vlogging and simplex stuff youve already got it, D7200
Thanks, great info! I have a have a set of AI, AIS and AF-D lenses and been considering a D7100. D7200 or D600 for stills
I got rid of a 5D MkII and went to M 4/3" cameras for video a few years ago, and have been using some decent Leica and the old Nikkors on them and getting respectable results, and wondering if either the D7100 or D600 would be worth switching for stills?
Some Nikon geeks are saying without an AA filter, the 7200 is a better performer?
Pick the D600
thank you for your advies.You were right .I just bought last week the D7100,Its just unbelieveble what this camera gives you .the sharpness is mindblowing.
It 2020 and I just bought a used D7100 and love it. I almost thought about upgrading to a D7200 in order to get a larger buffer for more fps until I saw what you had to say and until I put an Extreme Pro 170mb/s SD card it. My D7100 shots very fast with minor pauses between shots. I'll stay with my D7100 thanks!
Yessss! I managed to snag a Nikon D7100 refurb from Adorama today (4/24/2015) for $699! Added a refurbed 18-140mm and cheap Tiffen filter (for now) for $299. Can't wait to get it to replace my Sony RX10. Thanks for your advice....
Based on your recommendations I upgraded and just bought the d7100 body and the 50mm ais and 60mm 2.8D and so glad I did!! I had a d3200 and kit lens for a few years and am blown away by the performance of these older lenses. Thanks for your work, appreciate it!
+Eileen Woodbury big step up for not much money :)
FIST BUMP :P
Hi angry photographer.. someone once told me that the best way to determine which camera system to buy into, is by determining the lens that you want to use. I am quite keen on getting into landscape photography and am in love with the results that I'm seeing from the Nikon 14-24mm f2.8 lens. Does the DX format and particularly the d7100 have a lens thatv will give me the same focal length at the widest end (14mm) with picture quality that is tack sharp throughout the entire focal range; edge to center?
Would you take the D7100 over a Sony A6000 for weddings events on a budget in 2022 ?
Totally agree with everything you're saying. I had the D7100 and loved it. Just wondering though, when comparing to the full frame, wouldn't it have more noise per pixel at higher ISO than say a D810?
Suggestion needed: i'm getting Nikon D7100 with 18-200 mm and 17-50mm f2.8 sigma for $950 in 2018. should i go for it?
Hope you went for it, good deal there.
Hey wich 3-4 Lens you would advice for a d7100?
Currently i am seeting a replacement for the Tamron 17-50 2.8 and something wider, was thinking about getting the 15-30 2.8 Tamron and the 24-70 VC Tamron or the Nikon 24-70.
Also got a 70-200 2.8 Sigma OS ( Not the best but when budget comes i will upgrade to a Nikon one).
And for Makro the 105mm 2.8 VR is in the Pocket also. i think whith the 15-30 and 24-70 as an addition to the other glass i got i think i can almost shoot everything or?
+Mpingup that tamron is an FX lens and bit of overkill for the D7100. :) nikkor 12-24 or tokina 11-16 :)
+Theoria Apophasis oh and for the Midrange as 24-70 what would you advice there?
On the more Tele Side i am good just want to improve the Wide Angle Lenses. Also get rid of the 17-50 2.8 Tamron i am not happy with.
I have a D7100 and like it. but it causes the problem. How can I fix / avoid a flare / ghost images caused from long exposure because the sensor couldn't handle it? Thanks.
So I just bought another refurb from Adorama D7100. First thing I check was shutter count. It was at 5. Why is it so low and what does refurb mean ?
I really enjoy your videos, What can you say about 24-120 f/4 and 24-70 2.8? which one is preferable?
the 24-120 is a TOTAL PILE OF POO, ...an amazing number agree on this fact, myself included. Its CRAP.
The 24-70 2.8 (currently i own one) is a dreamboat, however.
shes very fast AF
shes RATHER FRAGILE, and easy to break
shes not EXTREMELY SHARP at any focal.
shes very expensive.
Theoria Apophasis I saw your video telling 24-70 is sharp at 24 and 50, How do you compare it with the prime 24 and 50? how about at 70? I'm really planning to buy one, and thanks by the way I have learn a lot from your videos.
nothing is going to beat a 50mm prime,
24-70 has a few issues.
its "very" fragile, and likewise not VERY sharp at 2.8 at ANY range.
likewise even at F4 across the board, there are plenty more sharp at every focal.
that being said, its a priceless lens with great value, however its the "worst" of the Nikon Trinity of 14-24 , 24-70 , and 70-200
all in 2.8
Theoria Apophasis thanks sir!
I understand your point. But in what aspects is the D800e superior to the D610(I was thinking about buying a d610)? I want the best high ISO, night photography performer FX camera in this price range. Please help, don't know what to choose
the camera you want it coming out middle of this year, a FF version of the D500
It would be too expensive for me. Full frame only second hand I can afford. $700-$800 is my limit. Around this price I have found the D600, D610 or the D800e second hand in my country. Or, if you know another model in this price range...
I own D5100. But I am torn between D7100 & D7200.
So which is better to upgrade, D7100 or D7200?
edgenike D7100 is best value, you can get a mint as new used one for $650
nothing comes closer, and the D7200 doesnt perform as well in low ISO shadow detail, however it does have a larger buffer.
Thanks a lot. Will be buying with this one maybe this week or next month
winks ;)
I already have d750 but looking for secondary camera for 200-500mm,for wildlife, should I go for d7100
Thank you, thank you, thank you Angry Photographer for setting me straight with this. Have been thinking about buying a D750 as an upgrade to my D7100 and despite doing a lot of research no one pointed out just how great the D7100 is compared to the mid level FXs and that I don't really need an FX camera for the photography I do. Instead I'm going to spend the money on some of the great lenses you recommend in your other videos.
if you want a second BEATER camera, get a D700 FX for $700 !
the D700 FX is a far superior build camera and tool than the D750 is.
Ignore the pixel peepers bitching about 12.1MP D700, nonsense, I make perfect 20x30 prints with a D700
yes yes , glass is important. Glad you didnt waste your money.
winks.
Hello Angry, recently dropped my 7100 and I'm using it as an excuse to upgrade, the thing still works despite having a crack in it the size of my arse. Yes I've watched your video but I wonder if for me FX would be best. I like taking night shots, night time landscapes and I've been under the impression the FX sensors will offer less noise. Thoughts? Also, where do you recommend buying cameras used?
+7dalglish for low light a D750
on the D7100 patch the crack and use it as a backup camera :)
Hello Ken. Hope you are great when my message finds you.
I am going to get my first DSLR and my budget is around 40k INR (~620$). As per your suggestion D7100 is going out of my budget (as it cost around 70k INR ~1100$ for body only).
In range of my budget I am getting the below deals (all are new products):
1. D5300 with 18-140mm VR nikkor kit lens - 50k INR (~750$)
2. D5300 with 18-55mm VR nikkor kit lens - 40k INR (~620$)
3. D5300 body only - 36k INR (~550$) [If I go with that can I begin with a 35mm 1.8 prime lens (another 10k INR) - will it suffice all my curiosity or as a beginner I should stick to a zoom lens?]
Looking forward for your suggestions.
Regards,
Sam
Such a pity Nikon fkd up on the AF of the D7000. I loved that sensor, but man the AF sucked. Wish they had kept that sensor on the D7100
ive been shooting for 20 plus years, right now i am shooting with the D7100 and D750, i use my D7100 99% of the time, with 24MP i'm just fine, for the money its hands down one of the best cameras for me, I shoot fashion, and editorial and just about everything else with it and i do this for a living!
i have a d5500 and i was thinking about upgrading to the d810 based on more pixels. should i upgrade to the d7200 or the d810 e?
In a two week span, I went from a D3200 to a D3300. I then saw the D7100 on sale (body), and I jumped on it after a friend of mine spoke extremely highly about it. I was initially intimidated by the D7100, but I watched your D7100 tips video and it sure helped a brother out. lol
I am only using the Nikon 35mm 1.8 lens. What would you recommend as second lens? I want something with some distance.
Thanks.
+Jose Betancourt for what use and budget? 2 most important lenses are a great wide zoom and intermediate zoom
and also a few nice prime lenses.
24-85 VR G Nikkor $220 used minty ebay
Tokina 11-16
most awesome cheap useful lens would be the 60mm 2.8 D Nikkor which is also $200+ minty used ebay, see my video on that lens. :)
Thanks for the recommendations. I don't shoot landscapes, or portraits. I mainly shoot objects, and people on the streets (NYC).
What do you recommend for upgrade from the d5300, i bought it last year, but i am looking to go to a full frame, and ofc id want it to last for at least the up comming 4 years. I was always in love with the d7000 series.....but now i am in full doubt as to what to get next. I am in photography and filming, i wanna do both so DSLR Full frame i am aiming for, what is your advice ?
Joshua Polanco whats your budget is the question????
and also how much glass (lenses) do you have ??? and what kind (FX or DX)
let me know
Theoria Apophasis My budget is in euro, for now im planning up to 1000 euro minimum. My glasses are nikkor 50mm 1.8g and the nikon kit lens 18-55mm 3.5 VR2
(this is my 2nd account)
1000 Euros would get a great used d800e
well, it would here in the USA that is.
Got the D7100 a few months back independent on this video and also I got the 12-24 DX lens in the mail today and you confirmed my choice on both of them :) Can't wait to try it out tomorrow. What telephoto lens would you recommend? I'm looking at the 70-200..
Jim Holecek AWESOME!!! how you loving that combo!!!!
ahhh, easy answer, get the FX 70-300 VR lens (ONLY THE VR!!!), not because it has VR, but because its a superior lens.
also it has DAMN FAST AF.
that lens is $300+ minty used Ebay
Thanks for the fast answer. I have yet to try it out.. I'm going to New Zealand in 2 days time, so I guess it will have it's premier over there. But I just love the D7100. My first lens was the prime 50mm FX 1.8 and I can't say enough good things about that one. But I'm a newbie in photography, so what do I know, right?
I'll keep an eye on the 70-300 VR. Once again thank you for your advice.
youre rocking on the perfect "team" there of camera and lenses.
Nikon is full of CRAP to call the D7100 an "advanced amateur" camera, ....its ALL PRO
My pair of $3000 D810 cant do 3% more than the D7100 can
the 1.3 crop on the d7100 are the images tack sharp?
want to known. long exposures for night city scapes good to...
thanks
yes and yes on both