I scrubbed toilets and cleaned office buildings for 2 years in high school so that I could buy a used 84 Turbo Z in my junior year in 1988. I drove that thing like a madman. Being 17 years old and blasting my way from Michigan to Daytona Beach, Miami, and Key West for Spring Break 1988 was something that I hopefully never forget. I drove the piss out of that car and loved every bit of it. This video definitely makes me smile.
These were great in the snow and on ski trips, the front drive went up hills and snow storms like a snow plow and it was fun to drive. We had a dodge lancer ES turbo and after the rebuilt transmission slipped out of warranty, we thought about keeping it for winter driving as back up but found the heads were cracked at 159k, so we reluctantly let it go. what a fun car it was, the hatch back on these could carry with seat folded down , a great car with memories! On the freeway, they could surprise many a corvette and v8 pony car. Loved the digital dash too!
That’s wild. I have a very similar story… my mom bought a 1984 Chrysler Laser XE turbo brand new off the showroom floor for $13,500. I worked all thru high school to save money and bought it from her in 1988 when I graduated. She promptly went out and bought a 1988 Dodge Daytona Pacifica turbo. She kept that car until she gave it to my wife in 2006 with only 77k miles on it, in darn near new condition.
Mine was the 85' Chrysler Laser XT with digital readout dash, 2.2 Turbo, T tops, 5 speed, with an awesome sound system. It doesn't run anymore, but I still have it.
For those complaining about its performance, you obviously didn’t live through the 80s. A Fiesta ST is just as fast, and handles and brakes better than an 84 Corvette. Let that sink in.
I wonder why tuner culture never seemed to bother with these, now that we live in the age of turbo-charging for performance. that might be seen as a blessing as exteriors wouldn't be littered with trendy design add-ons that really showed their time, but what about tuning and handling improvements.
I was stationed overseas when this came out. PCS's back stateside and wanted to buy one. No dealer had one. So they let me order one to my spec's, no charge. Yep, that car was built just for me! I love that car, it was fun to drive and got great gas mileage.
*Yes me too b bab, As I had an ''1986'' red on black Dodge-Daytona model, with rear hatch window louvers! And although not, the fastest little ride she was easy on the eyes !*
These were great cars. Especially with the 2.2 Turbo II later with forged internals and an intercooler. 175hp in 1987 (ish) was very good as long as you got the 5 spd stick.
Strong Tower Lawn Care my dad had an '88 LeBaron convertible with the 2.2 Turbo. Terribly unreliable, but still a great car. Surprised it had a drivers side airbag like Mercedes did back then
Strong Tower Lawn Care Ours had 216k miles. But the odometer wasn't working for years. It probably had closer to 300k. And a salvage title. Guess I can't complain. But that thing broke down on a monthly basis. Fuel pump, head gasket, you name it. My dad sold it and ended up buying an identical one a few years later, except it was a 1993. Much more reliable than the 1988, but still crappy lol
I had an 85 Dodge Shelby Charger with the same Turbo I at 142 HP. Then an 88 Daytona Shelby Z with the Turbo II at 174 HP = both were great cars and I had no trouble with either. For the day, they were fast, sleek, and I felt that a FWD 4-banger was the way of the future ... which was certainly faster off the line than a 5.0 'stang or an IROC-Z. Yes, they'd catch you at higher speed, but you would destroy them in an 1/8 mile sprint! Some folks made a big deal out of 'torque steer', but I never found it to be an issue at all. My '88 Daytona had the optional enthusiast driver's seat, which had dropped the pump ball and had an electric control panel on the front right seat bolster to move the front and back bolster 'wings' in or out, and air adjustments for the lumbar or front seat to be adjusted up or down = it was really the nicest seat I have ever been in ... better than my NSX too, and that was very comfortable. Nothing but good memories about those 2 cars for me.
I've had 2 Dodge Daytonas. 1988 base model 5 speed I bought new in Oct 1988 and a 1989 base model 5 speed I bought used in 2002, with 120k miles on it. Both cars were near bulletproof. Enjoyed them both!! That "expensive" trip computer could be added to any Daytona, if you had the part. Added it to my 89 Daytona for about $50 back in 2003. Plug and play.
I drove an exact copy down to the color inside and out. The seats were very expensive looking, and very comfortable. The 0-60 time was about 8.5 to 9 seconds. The msrp was more than what they say. I think it was around 14k.
I concur on your 0-60 estimate, their 16.9 1/4 mile is about a 9 second 0-60 time. I had an '87 Sundance coupe, Turbo I, 5 spd., and it ran 16.7s in the 1/4 mile.
Such a cool car, love hearing that buzzing 2.2L again...it's been a long time! In the real world, these things were very quick at a "stoplight drag". As you saw this thing would smoke the tires in 1st gear...I got dusted more than a few times in my old 305 carbed Camaro!
I had an 85 turbo 5 speed as my 1st car back in HS. My best friend back then had an 82 Iroc 5.0 G code 4bbl auto. He'd get me off the line every time, but by 3rd gear, I'd pass him like he was standing still. And that was bone stock at the time...Eventually with mods, I got the car down to 0-60 in 6.8, and the quarter at 14.4 at 96 mph.....
Unfortunately the guy I bought it from had it sitting in his yard in the grass for a while, which totally screwed the metal underneath the car. After a few years it started falling apart...very sad, as I loved everything about that car. The feel of the turbo pull as the RPM's climbed..also the big boost gauge that "redlined" to 10 psi for 10 seconds or whatever it was before falling back to the usual 7.5 psi. The trip computer, the 80's styling that was so stuck in its time but so damn cool because of it.
I had an 89 Shelby Daytona turbo. It was pretty quick. 1 of 157 ever painted silver with red interior. Sadly it’s long gone. I bought it to save it from becoming a dirt track racer. The guy I sold it to ended up parting it out, though there was nothing wrong with it other then needing a clutch. If I only knew then what I know now.
I had an 84 Dodge Daytona Turbo with 5 speed manual, I got rid of it after 2 years. The car had the super low profile tires to make it handle better because of the crap suspension & steering. I went through 12 tires in the 2 years I owned the car. I had enough & I traded it in for an 86 Dodge Lancer Turbo with 3 speed auto and 60 series tires. Installed a turbo inter-cooler & that car FLEW. With raising the boost from 9.5 lb for first 10 seconds to steady 7.5 after that without the inter-cooler I beleive was actually 147HP, with inter-cooler initial boost controlled to 14lb for first 10 seconds then steady 10lb the car screamed. Garage estimated 170 to 185 hp really great at the time it was about equal to the GLH's. Still a K car though. The GLH's used race against the Mustang GT's & win!
Had a 87 lancer es turbo with digital dash head gasket and transmission died same time at 130 k miles . It was 16 yrs old as used car. Hated getting rid of it, could cruise in snow and had a huge trunk area and great handling but couldn't find another head to machine and add new valves too. Wish I kept it. Still have the keys to it and Lancer ES badges for memories.
I was in high school when these debuted...and I remember reading the long lead intro in one of the car magazines either Motor Trend or Car and Driver....they also were previewing the new minivans. I think the spring of 1983, we started to move toward a post malaise era. Performance today, makes these cars look quaint but considering where we were the previous several years, this really was the start of an optimistic new age.
I had an 85 Daytona turbo 5 speed for 10 yrs. My dad special ordered it in 84, drove it until 91, then gave it to me when he special ordered a 92 Daytona Shelby Iroc 2.5 turbo 1 5 speed. 0-60 was about 8 secs, top speed was 123, stock. I put the now extinct Mopar Performance logic module in it, plus a modified cold air intake with K and N filter, and 3 inch cat back exhaust on it, and ran it at US 44 dragstrip in Indiana. Boost went from about 8psi, stock, to 11.5 with the new computer. On a cool night, 0-60 was 6.8 secs, quarter mile was 14.4 @ 96 mph. Fast for the early 90s. However, the std A525 manual trans didn't put up with that long.. I broke 3 of them before switching to the Getrag A555 hd and bigger halfshafts. I also switched to the larger 2.5 turbo motor mounts. Torque steer was stupid. I had to hold the wheel about 12 and 6 o'clock left to keep it straight under full throttle. As stock, the car handled ok but would understeer when pushed too hard. Brakes were good for the time. I wanted to convert the rear drums to discs, but never did. Rust killed that car, as the rear hatched leaked like crazy... Still, if I could find a nice example today, I'd buy an 85 or 86 to play with.
Makes perfect sense. A pony car is a reasonably fast yet affordable and economical 2+2 car that Lee Iacocca invented. It wasn’t just a V8 car (the Mustang always had a six cylinder or four cylinder option) and RWD was only a convention of the 1960s. Performance was not far off, either... a 1964 1/2 Mustang does a 16 second quarter mile with the 289.
@@danmccarthy4700 the datsun is more of a proper sports car being more refined and the geo storm doesn't have the performance of other pony car rivals of the era I guess you could call it one but its an economy car at heart
The Daytona was derived from the K platform, which was a total economy car. Just sayin. Hell, the original Mustang was a rebodied Falcon, which was Ford's economy offering at the time.
@@danmccarthy4700 but those were performance and sport oriented versions of a car on that platform, and once again they kept up with their year to year rivals for the most part, The only rivals the geo faced were Saturns sunfires cavaliers and neons, the camaro mustang etc were all too high performance the daytona just barely kept up, and for the 80s was kinda quick Imagine it like an 07 monte Carlo ss or pontiac GXP Grand prix they have v8s and powerful ish v6s but they can still be considered sports cars by some. In the end its mostly semantics
I had a 89 Shelby Daytona 2.2 intercooled with some very basic mods it was running 13.7 1/4s @ 103 mph.. Head gasket and eventually the clutch had to be replaced other than that it was a good car, gone but not forgotten.
I had a 1984 VW GTI with a 90 HP 1.8 liter non-turbo four cylinder engine - it was tested by the major car magazines at 9.6 seconds 0-60 because it was a super light 1800 lbs. That was the original pocket rocket.
I owned the Chrysler Laser, 5 speed, turbo. I missed the EVA so I found a junk yard module and made sound files. I had a lot of fun and good times in that car. I'd like to have another one today.
I was just getting out of college and so excited about the G-body and L-body Mopars that were coming to market. So glad the Iacocca was able to save the brand and seeing more than K-cars was very exciting to me. The Pepperoni wheels on these G-bodies were soooo stylish and different at that moment. You had to think they saved a lot of weight and that the engineers were more involved than the bean counters. 142 HP was amazing for a FWD 4-banger. The 1984 'vette that year was 205 HP, but certainly wasn't any faster 'stock'. I laugh seeing the 0-60 times or the 1/4 mile ... and though not able to keep up with the Buick GNX or Grand National, these little Mopars were a lot of fun and offered good bang for the buck. My new '85 Dodge Shelby Charger had a sticker of $10.4K, and I paid $50 over the dealer's cost at that time ... I couldn't have been happier! I ultimately bought a new 1988 Dodge Daytona Shelby Z, which was so much more refined than the '85 DSC. But I loved both cars and never once wished I had a 5.0 or IROC-Z instead. Thanks for posting. That was a fun blast from the past. Some folks think these cars were/are a POS, but the '80's were a tough time for Detroit and all of the Big 3 struggled with performance, fit, finish and reliability. That is why the '5-50' (5 year - 50,000 mile warranty) was a game changer of that era. The National Speed Limit was 55, and the speedo on most cars only went up to 85 mph because Washington didn't see any reason why folks would ever want/need to go faster. It had a decent stereo and cassettes of all my favorites, gas was under a buck / gallon, and I enjoyed every mile in my 4-banger Mopar!
Thanks alot for posting. Loved watching this show back in the day and had an 84' Daytona turbo when they first came out. I've had several Daytonas since, all turbos and they were all great cars.
I think MW's acceleration times would be quicker across the board if the test driver didn't always rev the cars to near redline, dump the clutch and do a mean ass burnout for every launch lolololol. Love Motorweek tho
Cody Clark most of the testing done for serious numbers is done without the cameras rolling just because it can take a while to achieve the best numbers. Then we shoot it for camera...so the run you see isnt the officially timed run and its also usually a spinning tire for added drama...back then anyway. Thanks for watching
This car to me was like Sword in the Stone or GNR Lies or Minnie Driver or a Monte Cristo sandwich. They are attractive and well packaged and generate significant interest.... yet fall flat and leave you slightly disappointed at the end.
Water cooled turbo in 1984, from Chrysler. This was cutting edge stuff. If only they had DOHC, VVT, and GDI, it'd be well over 300HP. The 2.2L could get alot of horsepower with modification. They were raced in SCCA,and IROC
@@kiprandom7208 Ratings notwithstanding, the 84 Chrysler turbos were down on power. 84 was the only year for mechanical wastegates, and they frequently didn't make full boost. 84 is kind of a bastard year...different turbo system, different ECM, and I think the transmission shift system changed for 85.
@Canadian Cuck Fighter My 1st car was a well worn 73 Ford Pinto with the 1600cc motor, some nostalgia there but I sure don't miss it...other than it was my youth. Topped out at 85 mph on the flat with a tail wind. Fave today is BMW E92-M3 which I haven't found the balls to approach it's top end of 178 mph, but it's rock steady and capable all the way up.
The 11 second 0-60 time doesn't jive with me 16.9 quarter mile at 80mph ,To get those times in the quarter you would be around 9 to 9 and a half second 0-60.Did anybody else notice this?
I got a used base model Daytona as my first car. Was kinda fun for a first car but as it was older it had it's problems. It was just ok as a beater. The breaks where a issue if you did not know the car. Spun the car on Industrial heading towards the Spring mountain entrance, the car would always fishtail.
I had a 1988 turbo Daytona cs in white. Loved that car!! I had to replace the turbo at 40k and then blew the head gasket at 50k. Still loved that car despite that.
My mom had an 84 turbo Laser. We really thought it was hot stuff. Looking at those acceleration numbers along with the power and torque figures. Holy cow were they slow. Today's econo boxes would blow the doors off that, forget modern pony cars like a Mustang or Camaro or today's sporty Chrysler product, the Challenger. And yes, I'm well aware that from 72 untill the late 80's cars were gutless. From the late 80s to today we've been in a horsepower war/race. And I love it!
My neighbor in high school has a second generation “Laser” with a turbo. That thing was crazy agile and quick, and almost got him into trouble a few times because it was so easy to rev and get up to speed
My friend had a Shelby in 1996 as a first car. So slow but it looked good. Always took a while but he'd eventually pull away from another friend in a manual Accord.
The Brakes felt Spongy thats because everybody that owned 1 of these cars always needed to replace the brake booster they rotted out all the time only fix was rubberized undercoating on the Brake Booster I made a killing changeing them out back in the day
Interesting.. My dad bought 1 brand new in 85, owned it until 91, then I had it until 02. N/P with the booster or master cylinder. Everything else eventually got changed, but not those 2 parts. Frt brake lock up was pretty easy to do though, I have to admit. The pedal on mine always felt firm and high when the rear drums were adjusted properly. Just sayn...
I had an 86 in 2010...still the original brake booster. Where do these random stories come from? Plus that isn't even what makes brakes feel spongy. Kinda scary from someone who worked on brakes a lot...
I almost bought one of these in '89. ended up buying a 5.0L Mustang, but I will admit the Daytona was a very nice car and had a lot of get up and go for the era. Chrysler had a turbo engine as well as a new 2.5L 4 in 89. The normally aspirated 2.5L was rather quick. The cars handled really good, but also had a comfortable, quiet ride. Even by today's standards, this was a really nice car. That hatch back was really nice as well. You could put a lot of stuff in that car. The 2.5 non turbo was actually a better engine. This is an 84 so the 2.5L was not available at that time. This '84 car was slower then the newer ones with the normally aspirated 2.5L. Also, the newer 2.5L was a stronger engine and most would run well over 100K miles with no head gasket or other issues. I had a K Car wagon as a company vehicle with that newer 2.5L engine and it could hit 60 mph in around 8.5 seconds. I'd imagine a Daytona could best that by a second with a manual transmission.
The Turbo Z was a fun and enjoyable car to drive . Maybe someday US car makers will bring back some cars that don't all look so much alike , Very few to pick from these days
Had an 84 Lazer turbo top of the line...loved the female voice on-board computer. Only issue I had it ate shift cables. They'd fray inside where they looped over a plastic semicircle to go out the firewall. Always kept a spare and could switch them out in 15min. Traded it in 91 for my wife's new Nissan she wanted ughhhhh ...the lazer lasted longer then the wife and treated me better. lol
This cars styling has aged very well . Design wise it's still solid . I hear quality control wasn't great . But I'd buy one in good shape and under 100k miles if the price was right.
bought an 86 Laser XT for 700 bucks and drove it for 3 years.... Spent about 300 on maintenance during that time and that was it. Sold it to a buddy for 500 after that so totally cannot complain about these cars...
3 speed auto? where, the test car was a 5 speed. yes it was an option, and nothing to laugh about either. A three speed automatic worked just fine, considering the 55 MPH national speed limit.
I scrubbed toilets and cleaned office buildings for 2 years in high school so that I could buy a used 84 Turbo Z in my junior year in 1988. I drove that thing like a madman. Being 17 years old and blasting my way from Michigan to Daytona Beach, Miami, and Key West for Spring Break 1988 was something that I hopefully never forget. I drove the piss out of that car and loved every bit of it. This video definitely makes me smile.
I traded my Datsun 310GX at the dealer when I bought the Daytona.
These were great in the snow and on ski trips, the front drive went up hills and snow storms like a snow plow and it was fun to drive. We had a dodge lancer ES turbo and after the rebuilt transmission slipped out of warranty, we thought about keeping it for winter driving as back up but found the heads were cracked at 159k, so we reluctantly let it go. what a fun car it was, the hatch back on these could carry with seat folded down , a great car with memories! On the freeway, they could surprise many a corvette and v8 pony car. Loved the digital dash too!
Unbelievable thread. Same for my. Same timeline, Turbo Z five speed and traded out of my Datsun 510.
I traded my '83 Nissan Pulsar for a new '86 Laser XT turbo with t-tops
That’s wild. I have a very similar story… my mom bought a 1984 Chrysler Laser XE turbo brand new off the showroom floor for $13,500. I worked all thru high school to save money and bought it from her in 1988 when I graduated. She promptly went out and bought a 1988 Dodge Daytona Pacifica turbo. She kept that car until she gave it to my wife in 2006 with only 77k miles on it, in darn near new condition.
Well played Motor Week...well played with dr evil...
Lol.....
Chapman Films Glad I'm not the only one who saw that.
Yeah wtf? Did a cheeky intern throw that in?
acertainshape I'm guessing it was Joe Ligo...
Chapman Films I had to rewind to see again lol
"Laser"
I scrolled down looking for this post. And, naturally, found it. :p
Chrysler Laser
Mine was the 85' Chrysler Laser XT with digital readout dash, 2.2 Turbo, T tops, 5 speed, with an awesome sound system. It doesn't run anymore, but I still have it.
That was a slick John Davis as Dr. Evil entry. Hahaha.
For those complaining about its performance, you obviously didn’t live through the 80s. A Fiesta ST is just as fast, and handles and brakes better than an 84 Corvette.
Let that sink in.
Steven D ...my Fiat 500 Abarth is faster than that 84' Corvette, LOL.
Charlie M. True. But not as a new car coming off the assembly line in the 80s.
I wonder why tuner culture never seemed to bother with these, now that we live in the age of turbo-charging for performance. that might be seen as a blessing as exteriors wouldn't be littered with trendy design add-ons that really showed their time, but what about tuning and handling improvements.
That's because the 83 Corvette was so much faster than the '84 vettes
Chris Barr there is no 83 corvette!
The Dr Evil cameo had me lose it.
"Mini-Me, stop humping the laser." Takes on a new meaning.
I know right
What was that?
I’m 47 and I still think that’s a great looking car.
Inflatable lumbar support and optional blood pressure cuff.
LOL.
It pumps your 80s sneakers
Laugh at it, but they were really REALLY comfortable seats...
@@mrlibowski493 the new reebox seat "pump"
Almost reminded me of a man's @@@@@ pump! 🤣🤣🤣🤣😳
I was stationed overseas when this came out. PCS's back stateside and wanted to buy one. No dealer had one. So they let me order one to my spec's, no charge. Yep, that car was built just for me! I love that car, it was fun to drive and got great gas mileage.
3D Archery what ever happened to it?
This thing doesn't seem like a bad car at all. It also looks like it handled well.
Got hit and totalled. It was a fun car to drive. I loved it.
IT WAS GOOD FOR THE 80'S. I HAVE HAD 3 OF THESE. I LOVE THEM
*Yes me too b bab, As I had an ''1986'' red on black Dodge-Daytona model, with rear hatch window louvers! And although not, the fastest little ride she was easy on the eyes !*
I found an 85 cs...loved the hell outta that car...
I used to have an 89 Daytona Turbo as a teenager. I loved that car when it wasn't breaking down on me! Haha
Hahaha me too! 89 n/a, blue, T tops, 5sp, louvers....man I loved that car.....when it wasn't breaking down lol
I bought new in 1984. I kept the car 9 years. I loved it. Traded with 158K on miles. She was just a fun car to own. Thank you
These were great cars. Especially with the 2.2 Turbo II later with forged internals and an intercooler. 175hp in 1987 (ish) was very good as long as you got the 5 spd stick.
Strong Tower Lawn Care my dad had an '88 LeBaron convertible with the 2.2 Turbo. Terribly unreliable, but still a great car. Surprised it had a drivers side airbag like Mercedes did back then
Cruzing 93 i learned to drive in an 87 lebaron 2.2 turbo ii.
It had about 150 or 160k miles when the turbo went
Strong Tower Lawn Care
Ours had 216k miles. But the odometer wasn't working for years. It probably had closer to 300k. And a salvage title. Guess I can't complain. But that thing broke down on a monthly basis. Fuel pump, head gasket, you name it. My dad sold it and ended up buying an identical one a few years later, except it was a 1993. Much more reliable than the 1988, but still crappy lol
I had an 85 Dodge Shelby Charger with the same Turbo I at 142 HP. Then an 88 Daytona Shelby Z with the Turbo II at 174 HP = both were great cars and I had no trouble with either. For the day, they were fast, sleek, and I felt that a FWD 4-banger was the way of the future ... which was certainly faster off the line than a 5.0 'stang or an IROC-Z. Yes, they'd catch you at higher speed, but you would destroy them in an 1/8 mile sprint! Some folks made a big deal out of 'torque steer', but I never found it to be an issue at all. My '88 Daytona had the optional enthusiast driver's seat, which had dropped the pump ball and had an electric control panel on the front right seat bolster to move the front and back bolster 'wings' in or out, and air adjustments for the lumbar or front seat to be adjusted up or down = it was really the nicest seat I have ever been in ... better than my NSX too, and that was very comfortable. Nothing but good memories about those 2 cars for me.
Strong Tower Lawn Care u
I remember those 85 mph speedometers.
Along w/ the 55 mph speed limits back then. Ugh.
55 mph lol it's still here just not for cars! try driving California in a semi ....
The speedometer on my 1995 Taurus with a 3.0 V6 only goes to 85 mph lol
My moms old '88 Cavalier when I was a kid only had an 80 MPH speedo lol
SuchANiceGirl22
Haha in 1988, maybe it was ok, but all they way until 1995?? Lol
You guys rock. Thanks for all these Retro Reviews, and that little "Laser" bit. :D
I've had 2 Dodge Daytonas. 1988 base model 5 speed I bought new in Oct 1988 and a 1989 base model 5 speed I bought used in 2002, with 120k miles on it. Both cars were near bulletproof. Enjoyed them both!! That "expensive" trip computer could be added to any Daytona, if you had the part. Added it to my 89 Daytona for about $50 back in 2003. Plug and play.
I had a friend in college that had the laser version, the digital dash was cool and it felt sporty, but my 1976 Camaro was faster!😂
Couldn't resist even one Dr. Evil reference, eh Motor Week??
I drove an exact copy down to the color inside and out. The seats were very expensive looking, and very comfortable. The 0-60 time was about 8.5 to 9 seconds. The msrp was more than what they say. I think it was around 14k.
Yeah, when dad special ordered his in late 84, it cost him close to 13k... w/o leather...
I concur on your 0-60 estimate, their 16.9 1/4 mile is about a 9 second 0-60 time. I had an '87 Sundance coupe, Turbo I, 5 spd., and it ran 16.7s in the 1/4 mile.
Cuffed up designer jeans and those Breakfast Club Nike gym shoes, doesn't get more 80's than that...well, the performance numbers do though, LOL.
Such a cool car, love hearing that buzzing 2.2L again...it's been a long time! In the real world, these things were very quick at a "stoplight drag". As you saw this thing would smoke the tires in 1st gear...I got dusted more than a few times in my old 305 carbed Camaro!
I had an 85 turbo 5 speed as my 1st car back in HS. My best friend back then had an 82 Iroc 5.0 G code 4bbl auto. He'd get me off the line every time, but by 3rd gear, I'd pass him like he was standing still. And that was bone stock at the time...Eventually with mods, I got the car down to 0-60 in 6.8, and the quarter at 14.4 at 96 mph.....
@@adamtrombino106 I think you meant 82 Z28 ...? IROC Camaro's didn't come out until '84
You are now obliged to release the 1987 daytona refresh review.
A 1986 Turbo Z 5 speed was my first car. Damn I miss that thing...
I also had the 1986 Daytona Turbo Z 5-speed with the CS (Carrol Shelby) suspension package. Great car! Kept it for 19 years.
Unfortunately the guy I bought it from had it sitting in his yard in the grass for a while, which totally screwed the metal underneath the car. After a few years it started falling apart...very sad, as I loved everything about that car. The feel of the turbo pull as the RPM's climbed..also the big boost gauge that "redlined" to 10 psi for 10 seconds or whatever it was before falling back to the usual 7.5 psi. The trip computer, the 80's styling that was so stuck in its time but so damn cool because of it.
@@ShakingTwoTrees2012 i love this Dodge Daytona 1986 5 speed my year favorite
I had an 89 Shelby Daytona turbo. It was pretty quick. 1 of 157 ever painted silver with red interior. Sadly it’s long gone. I bought it to save it from becoming a dirt track racer. The guy I sold it to ended up parting it out, though there was nothing wrong with it other then needing a clutch. If I only knew then what I know now.
"...children and other small folk..." It's Vertically-Challenged, buddy !
Happy 4th all. 🇺🇸
TJC450 MURICA
Same
Best country in the world, only country to put a man on the moon.
I did like the easter egg; I LOVE MotorWeek, you're the best!
I had an 84 Dodge Daytona Turbo with 5 speed manual, I got rid of it after 2 years. The car had the super low profile tires to make it handle better because of the crap suspension & steering. I went through 12 tires in the 2 years I owned the car. I had enough & I traded it in for an 86 Dodge Lancer Turbo with 3 speed auto and 60 series tires. Installed a turbo inter-cooler & that car FLEW. With raising the boost from 9.5 lb for first 10 seconds to steady 7.5 after that without the inter-cooler I beleive was actually 147HP, with inter-cooler initial boost controlled to 14lb for first 10 seconds then steady 10lb the car screamed. Garage estimated 170 to 185 hp really great at the time it was about equal to the GLH's. Still a K car though. The GLH's used race against the Mustang GT's & win!
Had a 87 lancer es turbo with digital dash head gasket and transmission died same time at 130 k miles . It was 16 yrs old as used car. Hated getting rid of it, could cruise in snow and had a huge trunk area and great handling but couldn't find another head to machine and add new valves too. Wish I kept it. Still have the keys to it and Lancer ES badges for memories.
Holy shit, that easter egg hahahaha! Whoever handles the retro reviews for MW is doing a damn good job!
? Egg?
@@ingeniousmechanic Easter egg. It's Dr evil saying laser.
This car was such a floater.
Those 85mph speedos. OMG. My 1986 5.0 topped out at 140 and I went pretty close to that with the needle wrapped around past 85 back to 25 lol
Very nice amd beautiful this Dodge Daytona
I was in high school when these debuted...and I remember reading the long lead intro in one of the car magazines either Motor Trend or Car and Driver....they also were previewing the new minivans. I think the spring of 1983, we started to move toward a post malaise era. Performance today, makes these cars look quaint but considering where we were the previous several years, this really was the start of an optimistic new age.
I had an 85 Daytona turbo 5 speed for 10 yrs. My dad special ordered it in 84, drove it until 91, then gave it to me when he special ordered a 92 Daytona Shelby Iroc 2.5 turbo 1 5 speed. 0-60 was about 8 secs, top speed was 123, stock. I put the now extinct Mopar Performance logic module in it, plus a modified cold air intake with K and N filter, and 3 inch cat back exhaust on it, and ran it at US 44 dragstrip in Indiana. Boost went from about 8psi, stock, to 11.5 with the new computer. On a cool night, 0-60 was 6.8 secs, quarter mile was 14.4 @ 96 mph. Fast for the early 90s. However, the std A525 manual trans didn't put up with that long.. I broke 3 of them before switching to the Getrag A555 hd and bigger halfshafts. I also switched to the larger 2.5 turbo motor mounts. Torque steer was stupid. I had to hold the wheel about 12 and 6 o'clock left to keep it straight under full throttle. As stock, the car handled ok but would understeer when pushed too hard. Brakes were good for the time. I wanted to convert the rear drums to discs, but never did. Rust killed that car, as the rear hatched leaked like crazy... Still, if I could find a nice example today, I'd buy an 85 or 86 to play with.
I have one listed on northern mi craigslist, check it out. True survivor
This was the first time I heard the Daytona referred to as a 'Ponycar'.
Also, "LASER".
Makes perfect sense. A pony car is a reasonably fast yet affordable and economical 2+2 car that Lee Iacocca invented. It wasn’t just a V8 car (the Mustang always had a six cylinder or four cylinder option) and RWD was only a convention of the 1960s. Performance was not far off, either... a 1964 1/2 Mustang does a 16 second quarter mile with the 289.
Soo... then, say, a Datsun 260Z 2+2 could be referred to as a "ponycar" ? Or a Geo Storm?
@@danmccarthy4700 the datsun is more of a proper sports car being more refined and the geo storm doesn't have the performance of other pony car rivals of the era I guess you could call it one but its an economy car at heart
The Daytona was derived from the K platform, which was a total economy car. Just sayin. Hell, the original Mustang was a rebodied Falcon, which was Ford's economy offering at the time.
@@danmccarthy4700 but those were performance and sport oriented versions of a car on that platform, and once again they kept up with their year to year rivals for the most part,
The only rivals the geo faced were Saturns sunfires cavaliers and neons, the camaro mustang etc were all too high performance the daytona just barely kept up, and for the 80s was kinda quick
Imagine it like an 07 monte Carlo ss or pontiac GXP Grand prix they have v8s and powerful ish v6s but they can still be considered sports cars by some. In the end its mostly semantics
I love the Dr.Evil "Lazer" at 5:51.
I had a 89 Shelby Daytona 2.2 intercooled with some very basic mods it was running 13.7 1/4s @ 103 mph.. Head gasket and eventually the clutch had to be replaced other than that it was a good car, gone but not forgotten.
I fell in love with that car as a kid when I was watching The Wraith movie.
I had a 1984 VW GTI with a 90 HP 1.8 liter non-turbo four cylinder engine - it was tested by the major car magazines at 9.6 seconds 0-60 because it was a super light 1800 lbs. That was the original pocket rocket.
mini me, dont hump the lazer
*Okay ''butt'' if the gas hatch is in the rear in next years model, I can't promise that I won't be tempted !? Lol :)O*
Thanks for reminding us about the Chrysler “Laser!”
Whoever slipped in doctor evil, I thank you! That was hilarious 😂😂😂😂
Where the fresh hell did Dr. Evil come from? LOL
Did you notice the lack of background music (er, noise) so we could actually hear the car's engine? Not anymore.
I still miss my "85 Daytona decades later. 2.2L FI no turbo/ 5 spd. Black on gray. It got 45mpg on hwy. I called it my 'mini transam'.
I owned the Chrysler Laser, 5 speed, turbo. I missed the EVA so I found a junk yard module and made sound files. I had a lot of fun and good times in that car. I'd like to have another one today.
Looks really cool, happy 4th!
I was just getting out of college and so excited about the G-body and L-body Mopars that were coming to market. So glad the Iacocca was able to save the brand and seeing more than K-cars was very exciting to me. The Pepperoni wheels on these G-bodies were soooo stylish and different at that moment. You had to think they saved a lot of weight and that the engineers were more involved than the bean counters. 142 HP was amazing for a FWD 4-banger. The 1984 'vette that year was 205 HP, but certainly wasn't any faster 'stock'. I laugh seeing the 0-60 times or the 1/4 mile ... and though not able to keep up with the Buick GNX or Grand National, these little Mopars were a lot of fun and offered good bang for the buck. My new '85 Dodge Shelby Charger had a sticker of $10.4K, and I paid $50 over the dealer's cost at that time ... I couldn't have been happier! I ultimately bought a new 1988 Dodge Daytona Shelby Z, which was so much more refined than the '85 DSC. But I loved both cars and never once wished I had a 5.0 or IROC-Z instead.
Thanks for posting. That was a fun blast from the past. Some folks think these cars were/are a POS, but the '80's were a tough time for Detroit and all of the Big 3 struggled with performance, fit, finish and reliability. That is why the '5-50' (5 year - 50,000 mile warranty) was a game changer of that era. The National Speed Limit was 55, and the speedo on most cars only went up to 85 mph because Washington didn't see any reason why folks would ever want/need to go faster.
It had a decent stereo and cassettes of all my favorites, gas was under a buck / gallon, and I enjoyed every mile in my 4-banger Mopar!
Thumbs up to the can holder!
LOVE THE RETRO VIDS LOL
Thanks alot for posting. Loved watching this show back in the day and had an 84' Daytona turbo when they first came out. I've had several Daytonas since, all turbos and they were all great cars.
I had an '88 Daytona 5 speed, with the pop up lights, as a teen. Was sporty at a low price point.
I think MW's acceleration times would be quicker across the board if the test driver didn't always rev the cars to near redline, dump the clutch and do a mean ass burnout for every launch lolololol. Love Motorweek tho
Cody Clark most of the testing done for serious numbers is done without the cameras rolling just because it can take a while to achieve the best numbers. Then we shoot it for camera...so the run you see isnt the officially timed run and its also usually a spinning tire for added drama...back then anyway. Thanks for watching
Ben Davis Oh ok. My bad. I'm going to have to show my friends that you guys replied to me, they may not believe it!😊
Loved the Dr Evil cameo.
This car to me was like Sword in the Stone or GNR Lies or Minnie Driver or a Monte Cristo sandwich. They are attractive and well packaged and generate significant interest.... yet fall flat and leave you slightly disappointed at the end.
That mid range is legit tho
There are a lot of 80’s cars that are awesome. They just don’t have the speed of cars now though.
mmm like a sierra cosworth? 0-60 in the low 6's..
XSDUP rwd I said there were a lot of slow cars that are awesome. Not that every car was slow.
@@xsduprwd3937 *Yeah or how bout' an Dodge Omni G.L.H. Turbo !?*
The Daytona/Laser’s looks have only improved with age. Such an attractively styled car.
Water cooled turbo in 1984, from Chrysler. This was cutting edge stuff. If only they had DOHC, VVT, and GDI, it'd be well over 300HP. The 2.2L could get alot of horsepower with modification. They were raced in SCCA,and IROC
My dad's cousin had one of these cars. I remembered seeing it when I was really young. I think it was either a Laser or Daytona.
*8 seconds* 0 to 60 with the 2.2 turbo 5 speed, not 11.
That's what my 85 did, 8.1 secs to 60...when it was stock...
I was going to say. Hell... my VW GTi could go to 60 in less than ten seconds with a lot less HP.
Turbo lag was drastic back then
@@kiprandom7208 Ratings notwithstanding, the 84 Chrysler turbos were down on power. 84 was the only year for mechanical wastegates, and they frequently didn't make full boost.
84 is kind of a bastard year...different turbo system, different ECM, and I think the transmission shift system changed for 85.
Literally one of my favorite cars ever
Wow! How sad.
That’s pretty sad man I would understand if it was like your first car or something but if it ain’t well that’s sad
Mine too....the 2.2 would crank....
Sorry about that.
@Canadian Cuck Fighter My 1st car was a well worn 73 Ford Pinto with the 1600cc motor, some nostalgia there but I sure don't miss it...other than it was my youth. Topped out at 85 mph on the flat with a tail wind. Fave today is BMW E92-M3 which I haven't found the balls to approach it's top end of 178 mph, but it's rock steady and capable all the way up.
My dad had a red and black 1981 Daytona in manual transmission. Sweet pony car!
This was the mid-level version - Looked just like the Chrysler Laser.
These were *super* -handling cars 🙂
My brother had one. Second owner. Eventually had to rebuild motor and transmission and then turbo issues and other issues
The 11 second 0-60 time doesn't jive with me 16.9 quarter mile at 80mph ,To get those times in the quarter you would be around 9 to 9 and a half second 0-60.Did anybody else notice this?
Yes
I got a used base model Daytona as my first car. Was kinda fun for a first car but as it was older it had it's problems. It was just ok as a beater.
The breaks where a issue if you did not know the car. Spun the car on Industrial heading towards the Spring mountain entrance, the car would always fishtail.
Doctor evil laser shot lol
Who quit motor week this week in the editing department
Currently replacing all brakes on my father’s 84 laser turbo. Ordered it new and it has 6,000 miles on the clock.
My father owned a 1981 Daytona, 5 speed manual, red, with the black Venetian look in the back. It was a fun little car.
So similar in looks to my first car. The Mitsubishi Starion. But thank god it wasn't FWD.
S Bludger yesss. Finally someone is a fan of Mit.Starion.. My childhood dream car in the 80s
Zahemi AZUL ISLAMI Especially the widebody ESI-R model.
Mel Laknanurak I had flat body . ESI_ R was so sexy though.
The Starion is a classic. I wouldn't mind driving one now if they were easy to come by.
The Daytona got even closer to the Starion when the refresh gave it pop-ups and a pretty identical front clip
I had a 1988 turbo Daytona cs in white. Loved that car!! I had to replace the turbo at 40k and then blew the head gasket at 50k. Still loved that car despite that.
I had the best version of this 85 black turbo Daytona with factory louvers and the multiholed mag wheels.
Do you think the numbers might have been a little better if there wasn't a broken down Porsche blocking the track?
It had pretty yellow paint, though.
The Porsche was just there to intimidate the Chrysler product 😈😈😈😈
I loved this car! Would like to have one today (2019)
I liked the styling of the Daytona.
My mom had an 84 turbo Laser. We really thought it was hot stuff. Looking at those acceleration numbers along with the power and torque figures. Holy cow were they slow. Today's econo boxes would blow the doors off that, forget modern pony cars like a Mustang or Camaro or today's sporty Chrysler product, the Challenger. And yes, I'm well aware that from 72 untill the late 80's cars were gutless. From the late 80s to today we've been in a horsepower war/race. And I love it!
Such an awesome car, if only you could still find them today
Those seats look comfy.
This is FIRST time that I have seen a car cup holder with a V8! Oh gee, what a hip driver. 😊
I just saw it as a tongue-in-cheek V8 engine reference.
Boom! Added bigger turbo, intercooler and NOS to my '84 Laser. Surprised a shitload of V8s. 😱Torque steer adventure in the 80s.
Dr. Evil was well done. Love the sense of humor!!
My neighbor in high school has a second generation “Laser” with a turbo. That thing was crazy agile and quick, and almost got him into trouble a few times because it was so easy to rev and get up to speed
Owned an 86 Carroll Shelby version black with gold trim and T top. In Canada it was called the Chrysler Daytona. Most fun car I ever owned.
@5:50 Okay, how did Dr. Evil sneak into Maryland Public TV's studios??
My friend had a Shelby in 1996 as a first car. So slow but it looked good. Always took a while but he'd eventually pull away from another friend in a manual Accord.
one shot of the final turn, and one of the corkscrew. 2 of basically the only 3 corners on the pre-1988 Laguna Seca layout
Whoever did the "laser" with Dr Evil bit, is a true memelord, i salute you
The Brakes felt Spongy thats because everybody that owned 1 of these cars always needed to replace the brake booster they rotted out all the time only fix was rubberized undercoating on the Brake Booster I made a killing changeing them out back in the day
Interesting.. My dad bought 1 brand new in 85, owned it until 91, then I had it until 02. N/P with the booster or master cylinder. Everything else eventually got changed, but not those 2 parts. Frt brake lock up was pretty easy to do though, I have to admit. The pedal on mine always felt firm and high when the rear drums were adjusted properly. Just sayn...
I had an 86 in 2010...still the original brake booster. Where do these random stories come from? Plus that isn't even what makes brakes feel spongy. Kinda scary from someone who worked on brakes a lot...
I miss the 80s man...both my brother and later my best friend had one of these. Some shenanigans ensued in that car
Epic "jump cut" @5:50. Totally laughed out loud.
I gave it a thumbs up for the Dr. Evil clip when he said, "Laser"
I almost bought one of these in '89. ended up buying a 5.0L Mustang, but I will admit the
Daytona was a very nice car and had a lot of get up and go for the era. Chrysler had
a turbo engine as well as a new 2.5L 4 in 89. The normally aspirated 2.5L was rather quick.
The cars handled really good, but also had a comfortable, quiet ride. Even by today's standards, this
was a really nice car. That hatch back was really nice as well. You could put a lot
of stuff in that car. The 2.5 non turbo was actually a better engine. This is an 84 so the
2.5L was not available at that time. This '84 car was slower then the newer ones with the
normally aspirated 2.5L. Also, the newer 2.5L was a stronger engine and most would
run well over 100K miles with no head gasket or other issues. I had
a K Car wagon as a company vehicle with that newer 2.5L engine and it could
hit 60 mph in around 8.5 seconds. I'd imagine a Daytona could best that by a second with
a manual transmission.
The Turbo Z was a fun and enjoyable car to drive . Maybe someday US car makers will bring back some cars that don't all look so much alike , Very few to pick from these days
I always loved that little car and hoped Chrysler would bring it back as a RWD or AWD model with a V-6 or 8
"Scoop"? That is a "vent", to help cool the turbocharger.
Very, very tiny scoops if any...lol
Had an 84 Lazer turbo top of the line...loved the female voice on-board computer. Only issue I had it ate shift cables. They'd fray inside where they looped over a plastic semicircle to go out the firewall. Always kept a spare and could switch them out in 15min. Traded it in 91 for my wife's new Nissan she wanted ughhhhh ...the lazer lasted longer then the wife and treated me better. lol
This cars styling has aged very well . Design wise it's still solid . I hear quality control wasn't great . But I'd buy one in good shape and under 100k miles if the price was right.
I always wanted one of these as a kid....kinda still do lol
norriszappa25
Don't sit in one let alone drive one as it will spoil the fantasy. Garbage.
norriszappa25
I my self wanted a Laser after I saw an add in national geographic in 1984-85. never bought or nor ever say I one. oh well.
bought an 86 Laser XT for 700 bucks and drove it for 3 years.... Spent about 300 on maintenance during that time and that was it. Sold it to a buddy for 500 after that so totally cannot complain about these cars...
3 speed auto......lol
1984 dummy
GM was not even a decade removed from their 2 speeds.
@marc. People bought automatics because they’re.... sew fawn-seh.
3 speed auto? where, the test car was a 5 speed. yes it was an option, and nothing to laugh about either. A three speed automatic worked just fine, considering the 55 MPH national speed limit.
So you can push the 0-60 time even further into the double digits...