Around 2008-2010, the studio I worked for uploaded our videos to Vimeo because UA-cam had a 10-15 minute length limit and most of our videos, like conference sessions, were longer. Also Vimeo image quality and resolution were much better and we could customize the player. But once UA-cam removed the length limit and improved the quality, we stopped uploading to Vimeo. It was too expensive and weekly upload limits were too low.
Mark my words UA-cam will make a upload limit soon. I know they already have a daily upload limit but they’ll have to make one for free accounts. Maybe only like 1K videos until you pay for more storage or something.
I agree. The companies that were growing at all costs have grown. It's time for them to find reasons to get money out of us. Mooches don't realize it, but they will not be missed when it's time to capture $. @@Bango9265
@@Bango9265 I have doubts. I would imagine a video only needs a couple of hundred views to cover it's processing and storage costs if ads are rolling, and that users who upload large volumes of video get more than that in most cases.
10-12 years ago when I was in uni, Vimeo was seen as 'professional' UA-cam vs the UA-cam of that era. However going back on to the site now, I've noticed the functionality of the site has fallen off. Even to do a basic search is painful.
Vimeo being for ‘professionals’ is definitely an image they cultivated. I remember in the early days of UA-cam the original Something Awful Lets Players tried to upload their content on the site only for Vimeo to crack down on video game content. They definitely prided themselves on being the video hosting site for professionals to host their work/portfolios even though that greatly limited their potential user base
Another company absolutely ruined by going public...color me surprised! To be honest, I have only opened Vimeo a few times and every time I was put off by the UI. It was simply bad and inferior to UA-cam which is funny since they were apparently trying to appeal to "creatives". The decision to not display ads is pretty stupid as well. Those who don't want ads can simply use an adblocker while the others won't even mind. Even with how accessible adblockers are, UA-cam and their creators are earning millions through ad revenue. The company is clearly visionless but I still hope they pull through. With the monopoly UA-cam has over the domain of video streaming platforms, more competition is always better.
When you've already asked for money from investors to bail you out and they won't invest any more into your company until you show a profit, the allure of going public and possibly raising 100s of millions of dollars is very hard to resist.
@@Derekzparty Sounds very tunnel visioned. These are corporate bigshots not kids getting enticed by candy. If you can't generate a profit when you have full control over the product's vision and direction, then you'll just be digging yourself in a deeper hole by going public.
@@DJ_POOP_IT_OUT_FEAT_LIL_WiiWiiit is? I've never come across those videos on vimeo. Or maybe I'm not searching hard enough. I can find those kind of videos on youtube though.
@@DJ_POOP_IT_OUT_FEAT_LIL_WiiWii Yep, i have personally been in beefs with not only moderators, but the people who started vimeo back in the day. I used to make movies based on computer games (machinima), and there was a point early on, in like 2007-2009, where vimeo had better video quality than youtube. But one day, vimeo deleted all my content, and the content of the people i worked with and collaborated with, on the grounds that our videos "trashed up" their platform. After this, i boycotted vimeo and never ever wanted anything do to with that garbage of a service. At the same time as all our videos was deleted, the owner of vimeo uploaded videos on his own channel, where he recorded things like his home stereo turning on and off.. Wow, such amazing content. But we were the ones that trashed up the place.. If vimeo finally goes down, i will eat a cake and celebrate.
@@Always.SmarterGoogle ran UA-cam on a loss for half a decade, just so they can gain monopoly and user data. If UA-cam had grown organically instead, it would be nowhere close to current success.
@@justahumanwithamask4089 no. youtube was already popular before google bought it; that's part of the reason why they bought it. and just because they put it on people's phones doesn't mean people are "forced" to use it, nor does it guarantee success.
"Free" (everyone LOVES free, just ask pirate-bay) video sharing service, and the costs are being paid for from user data and other income generating parts of the company.
I am with one of these corporate clients and the editing features are great. You can do so much edit every portion of the video, even delete text from the automatic transcript and it will be deleted from the video. You can also replace a whole video without changing its URL (also give it an alias). You have a huge gallery of stock footage for your promotional videos... Yet - we often create with vimeo and then upload to UA-cam or other platforms, because the player sucks and integration also. But we happily pay for it and it would be sad to lose them, because we would have to book a lot of other services if we didn't have Vimeo.
@@LogicallyAnswered "2020s are flying by" This sentence hits hard. I have no recollection of anything over these past 4 years. I find it hard to believe the world halting over a pandemic was 4 years ago.
I'm one of those Vimeo creators being priced off the platform. As long as I auto-renew, I keep my legacy features and modest price increases. But I don't think I will stay much longer. I have found more affordable features (ad-free, paid content subscriptions, day-passes, private live-streaming, unlimited uploads, sync license clearance) elsewhere. For a one-person show like myself, who makes music, arts and educational videos for schools and non-profits, I'm not their target customer. I have not sent them a single referral since they booted two of my clients without refund for TOS violations because of private links to some internal training videos (not all content) were behind logins at their website (not "paywalls" as their letters stated) unless they upgraded their enterprise plan for many times what they were paying. It's sad, but fortunately I have found a way to move on, and even capture back some of that client business I had sent their way in the past using the new platforms.
I remember Vimeo back in high school and was astounded by how high quality their videos were and how many creative people were on there. I always saw it as the bougie version of UA-cam where there wasn’t so much click bait and was more so about quality over quantity.
I recall that Chris Crocker debuted his music video on vimeo. A few other creators used to debut new videos releases on vimeo before youtube. I guess that trend's over, it's too bad because I have a vimeo account and really like it as an alternative to youtube.
I read your comment and thought, Chris Crocker ! That’s a name I haven’t heard in a while.. I wonder what he’s been up to.. let me google his name and see First hit “"Chris Crocker, of 'Leave Britney Alone' fame, is now a gay porn star". “ lol… ugh I didn’t need that
Back in my day, I always thought Vimeo was the "music oriented" UA-cam. Like you would go to UA-cam for general fun videos, but then Vimeo would be where bands and artists would upload their music videos or where you would find the more serious "with purpose" videos. Of course this was during the age when UA-cam videos had that 10 to 15 minute limit, so that's probably why they were even there in the first place. Such a shame that Vimeo pretty much became the Kmart of UA-cam.
@@xanderjames8682 Especially if they need to expand its server capacity because of increasing demand. But allowing too many ads to show at the same time could also reduce the click through rate from new visitors, thus reducing their potential revenue growth. So the best solution is something in between (place less intrusive ads to ensure the user are still comfortable)
I knew about UA-cam before Chrome existed. Quite quickly Daylymotion was alternative hosting videos missing on UA-cam, like half the music videos by Rammstein (most of which got to UA-cam eventually). I've seen Vimeo logo during pandemic in one of those bar charts over time videos. Never knew what it was.
Maybe you forgot but there was a time when there was possibility of copyright breaches if you uploaded gaming videos on internet. Luckily most companies realized its great marketing later but Nintendo for example still uses every legal tool to get videos down.
Imagine a timeline if Vimeo became popular and is the go to website to view videos. We'd get a video essay about "The Tragic Fate of UA-cam , the Copycat Vimeo"
@@bandito241 Then if YT owner refused to sign the acquisition deal, Google would made their own video streaming platform called "Google Videos" and still completely crushed the video streaming industry after just a couple years
We've been struggling with constant buffering issues as well. They say it's sorted, but a few weeks later we go through the same issues again. Their support staff have been great with communication, but it feels like we're paying 14x more for a product that barely lives up to its claims.
Same here. All our Vimeo viewers from Europe and Asia are still experiencing the infamous "VIBI" phenomenon, aka the Vimeo Intermittent Buffering Issue. Instead of solving this long-standing problem, they have spent vast amounts of money developing a strange kind of collaboration feature, in my opinion an embarrassingly useless copy of Frame-Io. Worse still, they ban former paying customers from uploading further video clips forever. Another very weird business policy, I think.
True that the business itself was a failure, but the ones who made bad decisions at the management seemed to have success for themselves and the shareholders, even raising money and pushing through the IPO. While the business fundamentals and employees suffer, it seem that they have managed to get themselves onto "rescue" boat before the company went downhill. It's so sad that this happens more often than not.
My favorite was youku for finding shows 😂 I think the problem is no upload site can run at a profit and I would say neither can UA-cam but since they are backed by Google they can handle losses until profitability. UA-cam says it’s profitable but the amount of viewers leaving I don’t know how long they can be profitable
doubt they are in trouble. TikTok was their most formidable challenger, but they adapted. unless hardware changes the way we consume videos youtube will be around
Vimeo also had the advantage (besides length and quality until UA-cam upped those limits) of a lack of an aggressive Content ID bot on all their uploads, which while it didn't prevent copyright trolling attacks, it diminished the ability for random bad actors to immediately get a video taken down for a violation, a benefit of not being ad-revenue based. Unfortunately, even premium ad-free features for software are going the way of the dodo because of how insanely lucrative it is to shove ads to everything and the mistaken belief that showing the same kinds of ads multiple times will result in any sort of purchase.
For music, I thought Vimeo was a more popular platform than UA-cam (or at least that is how it used to be) I thought that was it's main purpose. Once and while I still see some people post there content on Vimeo, rather then UA-cam. So I was always wondering why that was.
UA-cam has increased the number of adds to force us all into a subscription. That could be the next pluspoint for Vimeo. Also the quality of videos is high for Vimeo, always been.
I was in college earning my Integrated New Media Studies degree and it required a plethora of video production classes which was expected. One of my instructors was such a snob and had unorthodox requirements to post material online using "popular" sites then post those links on the school's server. This was redundant because we could've easily embedded the videos on a certain page for our class but he was so stubborn. The hosting site was Vimeo. It must've been 2010 and we didn't like it much. Unless we paid for the service, the website would take its sweet ass time to actually process our uploads up to several hours. Why not UA-cam? Who the hell knows. He also had us make a Twitter profile to post the same links, too, for.... MORE redundancy. If not, points were deducted. At this point Twitter still had its 140(?) character limit. Shortly after knowing I didn't need that jerk anymore for classes I shut it down. My Vimeo account is up and haven't been there for near a decade. It's just a "blah" website.
the original content could have worked for Vimeo if they just allowed creators to create said original content so it could be a platform where indie filmmakers could create a portfolio of work from movies and TV style shows
Vimeo should capitalize on how bad things are on YT, drop the ridiculous fees, bring in ads, be less restrictive than YT, profit People are looking for an alternative to YT, someone just needs to step up and actually compete
Literally UA-cam can't kill is porn streaming / video sites, alternate video sites like Dailymotion, Vimeo, Youku, Nicovideos and more are mostly dead when UA-cam extends its coverage to more copyrighted materials, covering more niche markets in other countries, lowering the barrier for the people using it, even without Premium subscription people are still able to watch HD videos, tons of shorts videos that turn people into using YT instead of former platforms, also YT's economy scale attracts more streamers into YT, not other platforms even Twitch.
Youku and Nicovideo are somewhat still popular in Japan, probably because those 2 sites are region locked. But as Japan continue to lose its population and the competition from other big companies (Google, META, X) continues to strengthen quickly, those sites could be dragged into their final resting place in the near future because of rapidly declining userbases
Nothing significantly different. They should have invested into providing software to help people create shows - Something like OST. They should have focused to take the content makers - A go-to place to create your online shows
It feels weird hearing someone compare Vimeo to UA-cam. They are very different in my eyes. UA-cam is (mostly) home made content with a shit-ton of ads because creators don't pay (the consumers pay). Vimeo is (mostly) pro content and is primarily aimed at creators that pay to upload their work.
I’m an old and to me, OG comes from the term “Original Gangster” but these days has just been transformed to mean “Original” or sort of like “the old school original”. At least for me, it was originally popularized by hip-hop in the 80s and 90s.
They also got woke, censored people, and didn't allow people to do the same as youtube. They used to be SEO friendly, but they got rid of that feature. They just did everything wrong, and they deserve the situation they're in.
Bro idk why but I’ve been watching less of ur vids nvm I do know why can you do more vids abt chatgpt or Samsung ai bc I just don’t really wanna watch the random companies and there stories ig
@@ericvulgate7091 Do you mean the crying about free speech until someone makes fun of him, or him LARPing as Tony Stark while the people he hires are the actual brains and he makes terrible sink jokes that even a dad would find stupid?
I have never used this for long, I always hated it. My college professor tried to force me to upload my animations on here, and I fucking refused lmao. It's always been so ugly and dated. Only film and animation people seem to use it, and as one of those people I have no idea why.
Around 2008-2010, the studio I worked for uploaded our videos to Vimeo because UA-cam had a 10-15 minute length limit and most of our videos, like conference sessions, were longer. Also Vimeo image quality and resolution were much better and we could customize the player. But once UA-cam removed the length limit and improved the quality, we stopped uploading to Vimeo. It was too expensive and weekly upload limits were too low.
Mark my words UA-cam will make a upload limit soon. I know they already have a daily upload limit but they’ll have to make one for free accounts. Maybe only like 1K videos until you pay for more storage or something.
I agree. The companies that were growing at all costs have grown. It's time for them to find reasons to get money out of us. Mooches don't realize it, but they will not be missed when it's time to capture $. @@Bango9265
@@Bango9265 I have doubts. I would imagine a video only needs a couple of hundred views to cover it's processing and storage costs if ads are rolling, and that users who upload large volumes of video get more than that in most cases.
dont give them any ideas now@@Bango9265
@@Bango9265true
10-12 years ago when I was in uni, Vimeo was seen as 'professional' UA-cam vs the UA-cam of that era. However going back on to the site now, I've noticed the functionality of the site has fallen off. Even to do a basic search is painful.
Vimeo being for ‘professionals’ is definitely an image they cultivated. I remember in the early days of UA-cam the original Something Awful Lets Players tried to upload their content on the site only for Vimeo to crack down on video game content.
They definitely prided themselves on being the video hosting site for professionals to host their work/portfolios even though that greatly limited their potential user base
Another company absolutely ruined by going public...color me surprised!
To be honest, I have only opened Vimeo a few times and every time I was put off by the UI. It was simply bad and inferior to UA-cam which is funny since they were apparently trying to appeal to "creatives". The decision to not display ads is pretty stupid as well. Those who don't want ads can simply use an adblocker while the others won't even mind. Even with how accessible adblockers are, UA-cam and their creators are earning millions through ad revenue. The company is clearly visionless but I still hope they pull through. With the monopoly UA-cam has over the domain of video streaming platforms, more competition is always better.
When you've already asked for money from investors to bail you out and they won't invest any more into your company until you show a profit, the allure of going public and possibly raising 100s of millions of dollars is very hard to resist.
@@Derekzparty Sounds very tunnel visioned. These are corporate bigshots not kids getting enticed by candy. If you can't generate a profit when you have full control over the product's vision and direction, then you'll just be digging yourself in a deeper hole by going public.
@@spawnofthedead4556 Profitability is no longer the #1 goal for some tech startups, with Uber being the trendsetter.
I mean Tik tok is a competitor, also X can have some room to expand to video as well.
Is any video sharing service profitable?
UA-cam was always a search engine first -Vimeo was not.
Sometimes I wonder why we have all these awesome technologies but such bad leaders. Vimeo is just another example of this 😥
Vimeo was the place for hosting 'artsy/fartsy' videos.
Big tech is run by a bunch of dumb left-wingers that don't believe in capitalism.
@@DJ_POOP_IT_OUT_FEAT_LIL_WiiWiiit is? I've never come across those videos on vimeo. Or maybe I'm not searching hard enough. I can find those kind of videos on youtube though.
@@DJ_POOP_IT_OUT_FEAT_LIL_WiiWii Yep, i have personally been in beefs with not only moderators, but the people who started vimeo back in the day. I used to make movies based on computer games (machinima), and there was a point early on, in like 2007-2009, where vimeo had better video quality than youtube. But one day, vimeo deleted all my content, and the content of the people i worked with and collaborated with, on the grounds that our videos "trashed up" their platform. After this, i boycotted vimeo and never ever wanted anything do to with that garbage of a service.
At the same time as all our videos was deleted, the owner of vimeo uploaded videos on his own channel, where he recorded things like his home stereo turning on and off.. Wow, such amazing content. But we were the ones that trashed up the place.. If vimeo finally goes down, i will eat a cake and celebrate.
I don’t think many people would have been able to succeed in that business, specially competing with Google
I liked Vimeo and always wanted to use it for my online tutorials but they were to expensive for me. And then after 2010 you just had to be on youtube
UA-cam succeeded because they were Google owned. They basically owned the entire web advertising industry before Facebook.
not really. the reason google bought youtube over vimeo was because it was already the better product.
@@Always.SmarterGoogle ran UA-cam on a loss for half a decade, just so they can gain monopoly and user data. If UA-cam had grown organically instead, it would be nowhere close to current success.
Came preinstalled on every android and you can't uninstall it, they forced it until it became popular
@@justahumanwithamask4089 no. youtube was already popular before google bought it; that's part of the reason why they bought it. and just because they put it on people's phones doesn't mean people are "forced" to use it, nor does it guarantee success.
"Free" (everyone LOVES free, just ask pirate-bay) video sharing service, and the costs are being paid for from user data and other income generating parts of the company.
I am with one of these corporate clients and the editing features are great. You can do so much edit every portion of the video, even delete text from the automatic transcript and it will be deleted from the video. You can also replace a whole video without changing its URL (also give it an alias).
You have a huge gallery of stock footage for your promotional videos...
Yet - we often create with vimeo and then upload to UA-cam or other platforms, because the player sucks and integration also.
But we happily pay for it and it would be sad to lose them, because we would have to book a lot of other services if we didn't have Vimeo.
Happy holidays Hari, great work this year!
Thank you Kevalan, onto another year! 2020s are flying by
@@LogicallyAnswered "2020s are flying by"
This sentence hits hard. I have no recollection of anything over these past 4 years. I find it hard to believe the world halting over a pandemic was 4 years ago.
@@spawnofthedead4556 holy shi the pandemic happened 4 YEARS AGO???
I remember when Vimeo had full 1080p movies and anime 💀 at a time when 720p was considered very high quality for a tv
Vimeo service is horrific. I'm always frustrated with this company.
I'm one of those Vimeo creators being priced off the platform. As long as I auto-renew, I keep my legacy features and modest price increases. But I don't think I will stay much longer. I have found more affordable features (ad-free, paid content subscriptions, day-passes, private live-streaming, unlimited uploads, sync license clearance) elsewhere. For a one-person show like myself, who makes music, arts and educational videos for schools and non-profits, I'm not their target customer. I have not sent them a single referral since they booted two of my clients without refund for TOS violations because of private links to some internal training videos (not all content) were behind logins at their website (not "paywalls" as their letters stated) unless they upgraded their enterprise plan for many times what they were paying. It's sad, but fortunately I have found a way to move on, and even capture back some of that client business I had sent their way in the past using the new platforms.
They have the worst search of any app on the planet, so frustrating I give up after one search.
7:06 I think the idiom you were looking for was back at "square one" rather than "ground zero".
Perhaps "ground floor"
I remember Vimeo back in high school and was astounded by how high quality their videos were and how many creative people were on there. I always saw it as the bougie version of UA-cam where there wasn’t so much click bait and was more so about quality over quantity.
I recall that Chris Crocker debuted his music video on vimeo. A few other creators used to debut new videos releases on vimeo before youtube. I guess that trend's over, it's too bad because I have a vimeo account and really like it as an alternative to youtube.
I read your comment and thought, Chris Crocker ! That’s a name I haven’t heard in a while.. I wonder what he’s been up to.. let me google his name and see
First hit
“"Chris Crocker, of 'Leave Britney Alone' fame, is now a gay porn star". “
lol… ugh
I didn’t need that
Lies
You are a fire man. I'm glad you started showing your face 😊
🙏
Back in my day, I always thought Vimeo was the "music oriented" UA-cam. Like you would go to UA-cam for general fun videos, but then Vimeo would be where bands and artists would upload their music videos or where you would find the more serious "with purpose" videos. Of course this was during the age when UA-cam videos had that 10 to 15 minute limit, so that's probably why they were even there in the first place. Such a shame that Vimeo pretty much became the Kmart of UA-cam.
Oh yeah!!! Thanks for uploading today!! Happy holidays!!
Of course Daniel! Happy holidays indeed!
I can appreciate that they tried to be different, especially with not having ads. Tough market.
Looking at youtubes fight against adblockers it looks like any site like this without ads is ultimately unsustainable in the corporate world
@@xanderjames8682 Especially if they need to expand its server capacity because of increasing demand. But allowing too many ads to show at the same time could also reduce the click through rate from new visitors, thus reducing their potential revenue growth. So the best solution is something in between (place less intrusive ads to ensure the user are still comfortable)
I knew about UA-cam before Chrome existed. Quite quickly Daylymotion was alternative hosting videos missing on UA-cam, like half the music videos by Rammstein (most of which got to UA-cam eventually). I've seen Vimeo logo during pandemic in one of those bar charts over time videos. Never knew what it was.
Banning gaming videos for 6 years was a huge mistake 😳 i wonder why they thought to do that
Maybe you forgot but there was a time when there was possibility of copyright breaches if you uploaded gaming videos on internet. Luckily most companies realized its great marketing later but Nintendo for example still uses every legal tool to get videos down.
Imagine a timeline if Vimeo became popular and is the go to website to view videos. We'd get a video essay about "The Tragic Fate of UA-cam , the Copycat Vimeo"
If Google didn’t buy YT that could’ve been the case
@@bandito241 Then if YT owner refused to sign the acquisition deal, Google would made their own video streaming platform called "Google Videos" and still completely crushed the video streaming industry after just a couple years
I use it, some people use it as course hosting and embed the video on website
We've been struggling with constant buffering issues as well. They say it's sorted, but a few weeks later we go through the same issues again. Their support staff have been great with communication, but it feels like we're paying 14x more for a product that barely lives up to its claims.
Same here. All our Vimeo viewers from Europe and Asia are still experiencing the infamous "VIBI" phenomenon, aka the Vimeo Intermittent Buffering Issue. Instead of solving this long-standing problem, they have spent vast amounts of money developing a strange kind of collaboration feature, in my opinion an embarrassingly useless copy of Frame-Io.
Worse still, they ban former paying customers from uploading further video clips forever. Another very weird business policy, I think.
True that the business itself was a failure, but the ones who made bad decisions at the management seemed to have success for themselves and the shareholders, even raising money and pushing through the IPO. While the business fundamentals and employees suffer, it seem that they have managed to get themselves onto "rescue" boat before the company went downhill. It's so sad that this happens more often than not.
My favorite was youku for finding shows 😂 I think the problem is no upload site can run at a profit and I would say neither can UA-cam but since they are backed by Google they can handle losses until profitability. UA-cam says it’s profitable but the amount of viewers leaving I don’t know how long they can be profitable
doubt they are in trouble. TikTok was their most formidable challenger, but they adapted. unless hardware changes the way we consume videos youtube will be around
Great video as always. Also that is not Anjali Sud as in bud, but rather Ronaldo's siu-d
??
@@LogicallyAnswered the pronounciation of the last name of the former CEO
hi
It’s pronounced sood like soot but with a d
Vimeo also had the advantage (besides length and quality until UA-cam upped those limits) of a lack of an aggressive Content ID bot on all their uploads, which while it didn't prevent copyright trolling attacks, it diminished the ability for random bad actors to immediately get a video taken down for a violation, a benefit of not being ad-revenue based. Unfortunately, even premium ad-free features for software are going the way of the dodo because of how insanely lucrative it is to shove ads to everything and the mistaken belief that showing the same kinds of ads multiple times will result in any sort of purchase.
For music, I thought Vimeo was a more popular platform than UA-cam (or at least that is how it used to be) I thought that was it's main purpose. Once and while I still see some people post there content on Vimeo, rather then UA-cam. So I was always wondering why that was.
i think this is what made Vimeo fall behind. The lack of identity really stunted its growth.
I tried to use Vimeo like a decade ago. Was an instant no when they wanted me to pay to upload.
I am old enough to remember yesterday, when I forgot that VIMEO even existed
Hahaha 😂
UA-cam has increased the number of adds to force us all into a subscription. That could be the next pluspoint for Vimeo. Also the quality of videos is high for Vimeo, always been.
"Personally I always thought Vimeo was just a UA-cam copycat that wasn't as popular."
~A UA-camr
I was in college earning my Integrated New Media Studies degree and it required a plethora of video production classes which was expected. One of my instructors was such a snob and had unorthodox requirements to post material online using "popular" sites then post those links on the school's server. This was redundant because we could've easily embedded the videos on a certain page for our class but he was so stubborn. The hosting site was Vimeo. It must've been 2010 and we didn't like it much. Unless we paid for the service, the website would take its sweet ass time to actually process our uploads up to several hours. Why not UA-cam? Who the hell knows.
He also had us make a Twitter profile to post the same links, too, for.... MORE redundancy. If not, points were deducted. At this point Twitter still had its 140(?) character limit. Shortly after knowing I didn't need that jerk anymore for classes I shut it down. My Vimeo account is up and haven't been there for near a decade. It's just a "blah" website.
Thank you, that was informative and wee done. I would have loved to see it on Vimeo. 😊
i use dailymotion since 2016 and cant get demontized any content is montized
vimeo cost money isnt free thats why its not used
Yeah, not surprising why UA-cam is preferred by far
EU DMA will stop UA-cam a little bit. That legislation was an attempt to make the competition fair.
Never even heard of this platform before
I actually prefere Vimeo over UA-cam...
Woah never been so early before! Keep up the good work🎉
Thanks for being early man!
Google
The destroyer of worlds.
the original content could have worked for Vimeo if they just allowed creators to create said original content so it could be a platform where indie filmmakers could create a portfolio of work from movies and TV style shows
AJ called BC the OG ("original gangster") the other day in his livestream with BC's CPO 👍
Vimeo should capitalize on how bad things are on YT, drop the ridiculous fees, bring in ads, be less restrictive than YT, profit
People are looking for an alternative to YT, someone just needs to step up and actually compete
now having videos taken down on tiktok for no reason there all still on youtube no one just cannot compete.
Some news sites using vimeo for embedding videos are now switching to dailymotion. I don't see space for two youtube competitors in this space.
Imagine having a video streaming site called Vi-ME-o and engaging in even worse censorship than youtube. What an absolute joke.
And here I am thinking this said VENMO 😂
Merry Christmas!! 2023
Hahaha, merry Christmas!
I’d like to use another platform, and differently leadership could make a difference, but it might be too little, too late.
They Simply, signed their own Death ☠️ Warrant…
Vimeo once took down some gaming montage videos I made and gave no reason. They dug their own grave not allowing content of all sorts
Ads, and nobody knows if they work or not, is where the money is.
Whatever happened to WebTV?
never used it, never even given it a thought till this video
You can make money off UA-cam… Vimeo you can not. Big failure.
Remember them? My work uploads there every week videos to employees
I opened vimeo & I found no video, other than demo vids
When a corporate acquires a startup and fires its founders.
Better quality on video. Too much spam and ads on UA-cam these days
That's because it cost money to host videos there.
Imagine if you uploaded this video to Vimeo
The last CEO Anjali Sud did a lot of damage and left to become Tubi Ceo
I liked vimeo. Lots of independent filmmakers.
Literally UA-cam can't kill is porn streaming / video sites, alternate video sites like Dailymotion, Vimeo, Youku, Nicovideos and more are mostly dead when UA-cam extends its coverage to more copyrighted materials, covering more niche markets in other countries, lowering the barrier for the people using it, even without Premium subscription people are still able to watch HD videos, tons of shorts videos that turn people into using YT instead of former platforms, also YT's economy scale attracts more streamers into YT, not other platforms even Twitch.
Youku and Nicovideo are somewhat still popular in Japan, probably because those 2 sites are region locked. But as Japan continue to lose its population and the competition from other big companies (Google, META, X) continues to strengthen quickly, those sites could be dragged into their final resting place in the near future because of rapidly declining userbases
Hm.....i think i only used that to watch pirated anime that people posted as secondary links.
Can you do a video about vevo
Yeah , that was a thing
Next Dailymotion?
Do dailymotion next. ❤
Nothing significantly different.
They should have invested into providing software to help people create shows - Something like OST. They should have focused to take the content makers - A go-to place to create your online shows
The accidental impact College Humor has had.
What sucks more is UA-cam wasn't even trying to BE UA-cam. They started as a DATING SITE LOL.
You should do a video about vine.
It feels weird hearing someone compare Vimeo to UA-cam. They are very different in my eyes. UA-cam is (mostly) home made content with a shit-ton of ads because creators don't pay (the consumers pay). Vimeo is (mostly) pro content and is primarily aimed at creators that pay to upload their work.
Ashley who?
Patreon when Vimeo shutsdown
NO hard feelings! i had only bad experience with them anyways
It's weird watching this guy talk with such a massively over processed voice.
Wdym
ScottManFun from Vimeo:
You're misreading the quote that's on screen...
What's an OG?
Wait Vimeo still exists
What is "OG"? I am getting really tired of videos where people just throw in acronyms without explanation. Stop it.
I’m an old and to me, OG comes from the term “Original Gangster” but these days has just been transformed to mean “Original” or sort of like “the old school original”.
At least for me, it was originally popularized by hip-hop in the 80s and 90s.
@EdherJr How does that even work? 🙄
That's such an old acronym. Are you 100 years old? 😂
@@ElizabethUkeh 59. What's next, I don't know "bruh"? 🤣
It is very different business model than youtube.
They also got woke, censored people, and didn't allow people to do the same as youtube. They used to be SEO friendly, but they got rid of that feature. They just did everything wrong, and they deserve the situation they're in.
I remember when Vimeo had no censorship while UA-cam had it in full swing. But I guess that was before that woman was appointed CEO.
only once in my life used Vimeo
Bro idk why but I’ve been watching less of ur vids nvm I do know why can you do more vids abt chatgpt or Samsung ai bc I just don’t really wanna watch the random companies and there stories ig
Female leaders do this to any company.
Vimeo = Hydrox
UA-cam = Oreo
Forgot Veoh :D
Maybe Apple should have bought Vimeo.
Elon musk should buy one of these platforms and have all his alt right friends on there
I see you've never listened to anything he's ever said.
@@ericvulgate7091 Do you mean the crying about free speech until someone makes fun of him, or him LARPing as Tony Stark while the people he hires are the actual brains and he makes terrible sink jokes that even a dad would find stupid?
Eh, Rumble and BitChute already exist for that
Dailymotion be like:
I have never used this for long, I always hated it. My college professor tried to force me to upload my animations on here, and I fucking refused lmao. It's always been so ugly and dated. Only film and animation people seem to use it, and as one of those people I have no idea why.
Good video. But hard to understand this guy's accent
For me i feel like vimeo is the site teachers use to show pshe gay stuff to the class
That's all that's on there lmao.
🎄
So they take G-pay or real money 😂
Also great vid tho
Bro keep your beard plz
Hahaha alright
Thank you! lmao@@LogicallyAnswered
Are you gendering Vimeo with "she"?
Everything is "OG" nowadays. It's buzz word nowadays