John gets 'fact checked'
Вставка
- Опубліковано 11 лип 2024
- Fact checked video by FB, A video about my video about this research paper
• Study: Vaccines Being ...
Intravenous Injection of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) mRNA Vaccine Can Induce Acute Myopericarditis in Mouse Model
academic.oup.com/cid/advance-...
healthfeedback.org/claimrevie...
Leo Nicolai, Cardiology Fellow, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich:
German Centre for Cardiovascular Research
Indeed, there is peer-reviewed work showing in mice that possibly intravenous injection of mRNA vaccine leads to myocardial inflammation.
that intravenous injection of adenoviral vector based vaccine (AZ1222, ChAdOx1) leads to thrombocytopenia and platelet-directed immune responses,
offering a possible explanation for vaccine-induced thrombosis/thrombocytopenia
these data might indicate a simple measure to lower the incidence of vaccine-induced side effects,
There is a lack of data on frequency and effects of IV injection in humans.
Most likely, two approaches are needed to further validate the data:
Large animal studies
Studies comparing incidence of vaccine-associated thrombosis/thrombocytopenia/ myocarditis in countries with mandated syringe aspiration to countries that don’t mandate this practice.
Thrombocytopenia and splenic platelet directed immune responses after intravenous ChAdOx1 nCov-19 administration (29th June 2021)
www.biorxiv.org/content/10.11...
Recently a rare and novel complication of SARS-CoV-2 targeted adenovirus vaccines has emerged: thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS).
we employ in vitro and in vivo models
to characterize the possible mechanisms of this platelet-targeted autoimmunity.
We show that intravenous but not intramuscular injection of ChAdOx1 triggers platelet-adenovirus aggregate formation and platelet activation.
After intravenous injection, these aggregates are phagocytosed by macrophages in the spleen and platelet remnants are found in the spleen.
This is followed by a pronounced B-cell response with the emergence of circulating antibodies binding to platelets.
Our work contributes to the understanding of TTS and highlights accidental intravenous injection as potential mechanism for post-vaccination TTS.
Hence, safe intramuscular injection, with aspiration prior to injection,
could be a potential preventive measure when administering adenovirus-based vaccines.
Helen Petousis-Harris, Associate Professor, University of Auckland:
Vaccinologist and associate professor at the University of Auckland
There are a range of injection techniques for administering vaccines,
Injecting fast and withdrawing the needle
Injecting slowly before withdrawing
Pulling back on the plunger, seeing there is no blood, then injecting. This is called aspiration.
Rationale for aspirating
vaccine could be inadvertently delivered into the blood rather than the muscle tissue.
But as the flashback of blood hardly ever happens, the practice was abandoned by many practitioners.
I have not seen any evidence to support the rejection of this hypothesis at this stage.
The animal model study supports the possibility that inadvertent injection into a blood vessel could result in undesirable reactions.
However, the majority of myocarditis cases are occurring in young males after the second dose, something that this hypothesis does not explain.
My conclusion is that this requires more research and observing the patterns of post-vaccine myocarditis among populations where aspiration is practiced could be helpful.
Common sense in Denmark
en.ssi.dk/news/epi-news/2021/...
COVID-19 Vaccine Janssen
A single 0.5 mL dose of undiluted vaccine is given.
Based on a precautionary principle, we recommend aspiration before injection.
Download John's two comprehensive but free educational text books or make a donation to the campbellteaching project using this link: 159.69.48.3
Dear Sir, my husband and I are South Africans who have been living in Thailand for almost two decades. We managed to obtain the government's AZ vaccine and was due for our first vaccine at the beginning of July at a private hospital in Bangkok. I have been following you since the beginning of last year and on the strength of your advice, regarding aspiration of the needle, I requested that they pull back on the syringe. After involving quite a crowd and a translator, a senior nurse finally appeared and informed me that they use "modern techniques" only (by not aspirating). I was insistent and pointed out the recent articles that you used in your discussions. The senior nurse disappeared and returned a bit later to thank me that I informed her of the "new" findings (she showed me another article on her phone that she had found). They aspirated the injection and when I returned three months later for the second vaccine, aspirating the injection was standard procedure for all. Thanks to your unbiased approach to data, I reckon you have kept quite a number of people safe so far. Much gratitude.
Wow! Just goes to show the power one person can have to speak their truth and make a positive difference. Inspiration for us all.
Wow that is incredible, good for you!!
@@MK-ih6wp 😄👍Thanks❗️
@@rebeccablech1140 Indeed❗️😀
Curious that she referred to aspirating as the "new" findings. It really makes you wonder what has been going on to dumb people and practices down, rewriting science etc. for them not to know what was once established and common sense practice.
I have to give my dog immunotherapy injections. The vet showed me how to do it and how to aspirate the syringe. If it's essential for my dog it must be essential for people.
Brick, thick bin bag, canal
are we're going to use horse injection techinques on humans now?
Deb, My dog had autoimmune issues and we switched to raw and it was the best decision. No more issues.
Strange replies?: The correct intramuscular injection technique in all species is to aspirate before injection.
Standard procedure in the vet industry. Yet we treat humans like cattle. The irony.
I keep hearing about the “lack of data” on the vax side affects but at the same time I hear “the vax is totally safe”. How can both be true?
They aren't, and this is the tip of the iceberg
it's exactly why they don't do proper randomised control studies, they stick to epidemiological stuff, because then they can fact check by using the phrase "there is no evidence that ...." when it is logical that there is no evidence or that there hasn't been alink established between x and z, it's because there haven't been studies done.
@@Meoli55 BINGO! I really detest how "fact checkers" also called "misinformation spreaders" use the term "no evidence of", even when there definitely is evidence.
@Jack Rousseau they aren't safe, just dig a bit, you might be surprised
David E. Martin testifies at the German Corona Inquiry Committee July 9th, 2021
@Jack Rousseau you triggered bro? seems you are another running around with your head in the sand, "there is no evidence".
This is probably why we are seeing athletes with higher incidence. Larger veins, thinner but denser muscle tissue, lower fat. Increases the likelihood of catching a vein.
Or perhaps the vaccine isnt perfect, and these casualties are just the ones you hear about
A lot of athletes become covid long haulers too.
Thas why younger guys are suffering from mydocroditis. It all connects and makes sensw
@@robertrichardson9 of course its not safe its gene therapy
Intense exercise damages the vasculature causing inflammation (including the heart). If the injection is intravascular then there's a risk that it aggregates in the bone marrow. There is evidence that when this happens monocytes produced by the bone marrow carry spike proteins to sites of inflammation where they induce further thrombosis. Bone marrow cells can survive for over a year meaning this is how long they can produce cytotoxic spike proteins.
As a retired Canadian nurse, I have a vivid recollection of the first time I aspirated blood while administering an IM injection. It happened at least once more during the remainder of my career. Having been taught to aspirate (40+ years ago) as a student, that was my practice/habit throughout my nursing career. Thanks for being a constant and credible source of reliable information during this time. I have really appreciated the quality and breadth of your presentations since the early days of this pandemic.
You would be shocked that i was told by the covid vaccine immunization clinic site lead (crn) to STOP aspirating. I am a Canadian pcp and was helping out the clinic on my days off. This bs happened on my last shift. Otherwise i would have quit. No scientific reason. Was told that it was just a policy. I was glad that i work for myself in my normal job and don't need to follow idiotic policy..
Thank you. I would like to know if you have to discard the vaccine if blood is aspirated and use a second serynge?
@@duckraisedbychickens1986 yes, it's true. I am also in Canada. I asked the person administered the shot to my daughter to aspirate and we were told that they were instructed not to aspirate. Doesn't make any sense to me at all with this practice.
Same training as Canadian medical student. Then I came to the US and watched a neurosurgeon inject lidocaine into a vessel and nearly kill a patient 😔
@@duckraisedbychickens1986 i believe it: convenience
I got my 3rd dose of Pfizer yesterday and asked the nurse to Asperate the shot. She asked why and I told her about your video & theory. She found that interesting and that it made sense. She did that for me and said she might do that for all her future patients as it's a very easy thing to do. Thanks for the info Dr.!
just tell her i dont want that poison entering my blood stream and causing problems in my heart
Scary that after hearing about something that makes sense she will only consider doing it for other patients.
A nurse who did our family rejected the notion, saying this is the old way of doing things.
@@sashazxtt it is an odd way of doing things, aspirating IM shots isn't recommended by major health administrations. Body builders do tons of at home IM injections, and they hit veins very infrequently even though they would have larger veins compared to the general population. When a vein is hit, blood will appear in the pin even through a 29g or slin pin. It's very obvious when a vein has been hit.
Carey M: You got 3 shots?! 🙄 Why??
I have been educating people who give injections one at a time to aspirate for blood. Today, I got my flu shot and I asked the tech to do this. To his amazement and mine, we got a blood return! He thought I was a "know it all" for asking him to do it. After getting another flu shot kit we proceeded this time with no blood when he pulled the plunger back first and then finished the injection. One convert down. Maybe he can influence others that don't check to make sure they are not in a vein.
As the patient, demand that they check to make sure they have not hit a vein.
Geez. That might have saved your life.
I was told to do that for the dog's shot too...
Aspirate, where any material is injected into the body.
My local hospitals stopped doing this last century .
@@davidarundel6187 That is Dr. John's point. There are variations in the anatomy and the length of the needle used because there are veins that run down the arm, he believes it is happening. It is not being taught and it should be. By doing it, you endure that you are not in a vein and eliminate that variable that may be causing pericarditis or myocarditis in a small percentage of people.
Don't forget your 10th jab
I had my first covid-19 jab today, I'm not anti vax, but haven't felt the need until now. Asked the nice lady to aspirate & she said they don't do it. I said no worries I won't have it done then. She went a checked with the Doctor, came back & said they'd make a special case for me and aspirate. Job done 😎👍🏼
I know I'm late. But I got ITP with a 2 week stay in my local hospital. Platelets at 3. Didn't blame the vaccine but turns out the high probability was jab done wrong.
Did they say why they don't normally aspirate?
@@wayneberry3453 Hi, she said in essence it was an outdated procedure.. Had my 2nd jab done recently and the lady that did it was as good as gold. She said it was the 2nd time she'd been asked (I think that day)...
@@michaeldell3929 unbelievable... I'm still kicking 50mg of steroids at the moment but platelets at 159 from 3 in about 4 - 6 weeks. I was haemorrhaging, bruising, peeing blood lol... Was interesting. In the end "triggered by Pfizer" about 2 weeks ago, a doctor died from ITP I think 2 days after the second shot. It's uh... Not for everyone
@@wayneberry3453 Sorry to hear that 😞 I hope you're on a speedy road to recovery! One of my brother in laws started to have episodes of blacking out after his jab. They're not sure if it's related or not, I think it probably is.. I guess it doesn't run smoothly for everyone..
@@michaeldell3929 thanks mate. Yeh weren't great symptoms but not much pain. Just discomfort really.
"...from ignorance to negligence"
Bravo, dr Campbell for calling it like it is! Validation is sweet!
how true. there is something sinister in all of this.
Once is an accident, twice is coincidence. Three times is malice. We're on 3,855. 😵
Each time I come back to this channel I’m so impressed by Dr John - he keeps “knocking it out of the park!” Competence, communication, passion - it’s inspiring to see a man on a mission. I hope I’m half as sharp when I’m John’s age. It seems selfish to ask one man to keep up this quantity and quality of work, but if you can, then know that it’s so appreciated by so many.
I am not sure why you are interested in theories and just plain data. How is it changing your life ? Shrug ! Move on and live ! Watch a movie instead !
@@michaelflamingsword3131 yet, here you are. Take your own.
Very well put mate.
I’ve watched this bloke closely over the last couple of years, often felt he is way too naively trusting of medical authorities and yet sensed that his following combined with his genuine belief in following the science would lead to an interesting and positive outcome.
These self-proclaimed fact checkers have hilariously succeeded in debunking their own credibility to shreds!
Sadly, the WHO has published advice that one should NOT aspirate when giving the vaccines. Priority is to make the vaccination as painless as possible I guess.
@@williamhornabrook8081 Why would they advised this
I feel like Dr. Campbell should be more annoyed with the fact that his information got flagged for being misleading. People only read the headlines and now this information will be censored by facebook. This was not a good thing, this was a major blow to the spread of this important information honestly.
He is not a doctor
@@martd1352 He knows more about clinical practice than many Drs. He is a Dr as he has a doctorate, whereas an MD only has an honorary doctorate.
@@shasha259 he is not a doctor
@@shasha259 yeah look I’m super done with this covid nonsense, and am tired of the mainstream propaganda. That’s said, if this dude doesn’t have an MD, he’s not a real doctor, and for say otherwise makes us no better than the liars in media and government. Many people with PhDs (me included) find it very cringe when non-MDs walk around saying “Dr” with no clarification.
@@bentolinmaddox9806 he has no medical doctorate the guy worked as an ae nurse for forty years it's easy to look up. That shasha troll has no clue and neither has John. You are right to be miffed I only have a bsc and this guy grinds me. He is one off the lot that trained the current shower off shit that work in NHS ae departments. Peace be with you
In Canada we are told not to aspirate, still not sure why this is being practiced. I no longer give injections because of this practice.
As long as some crap is forcefully rammed into someones body and claimed to be safe who cares right? The drug company got paid and the nurse got paid and the hospital got paid no one gives a crap about the person getting a vaccine! Well lately that is the way it seems.
"The problem only occurs in young males. So, let's not change anything." As if young males are not worth protecting their lives.
I don't understand.
John mentioned towards the end, it seems to be a case of not wishing to appear wrong in the previous choice........?
Call it "political ego"?
Thats basically what the doctor said on the Joe Rogan podcast yesterday- he argued we know how to deal with the heart but not the long term side effects of covid - imagine that being an actual argument
That's not what they are saying. They are making the point that this hypothesis doesn't explain why myocarditis affects mostly young men after the second dose. As Dr Campbell says there may be more than one reason for these undesirable side effects.
well riddle me this....
Imagine an athlete.... for the first time, succumbs to the pressure of his corrupt coach and agree to taking an anabolic steroid injection to 'up his game' a little bit.
The coach performs a PERFECT intramuscular injection..... aspirated properly.
A few days later... this ill advised athlete gets called in for a blood test and a urine sample.
Do you think this athlete is testing positive for steroids in his blood and his piss?..... OF COURSE HE IS!
The steroids.... injected intramuscularly....are now in the blood.... in the lymph.... passing through the kidneys and the liver.... passing through the heart.... and throughout the ENTIRE system.
The athlete is DEFINITELY failing his blood test...that's for SURE.
So please Don't fall for this red herring.... this smoke screen.... to pass the blame for a toxic product.... from the manufacturers ONTO the administrators.
The product gets into the blood..... end of story.
And it's toxic to the blood.... capillaries and organs.
Some people can handle the toxicity.... and some people can't.
Some people will present with symptoms immediately..... and some people may take longer.... or may be lucky.
But many will be unlucky..... and that's NOT on.
@@chrish9164, it may have something to do with how long it takes to get from muscle to blood. It may also have something to do with the dose administered. It may even have to do with how near the injection is to a sufficiently large vessel. Blood carries oxygen and nutrients to every cell in the body, aspiration only shows a vessel if you find one large enough to provide sufficient blood to be visible.
In my 40+ years of professional nursing I have given thousands of injections. I was taught to aspirate before injection. (That was back when the dinosaurs roamed.) It only took one bloody flashback in the syringe and I was convinced aspiration was essential. Thankfully that happened early in my career. Nurses aren't taught that anymore.
IT IS STILL BEING TAUGHT TO ASPIRATE IN MED SCHOOL AND NURSING SCHOOL!
@@scottdhorn little johnny should not be injecting anything.
@@rhontopo In Canada nurses and pharmacists are NOT taught to aspirate anymore. The WHO states it is not necessary to aspirate! This will take some effort to correct policies. I have written to my provincial nursing association as well as CDC about this, and waiting to see/hear if they will act on it.
My nursing students in Spain are taught to do it this way... the problem comes when the national guidelines go against their training... so it is then left up to each nurse to decide.
My daughter is an almost brand new nurse in Australia and she tells me that's the way she was taught.
As a veterinarian, I always aspirated when administrating any injection. I can't count the number of times I have has a flash back and removed the needle. I can't believe that isn't being done in this day in age.
That is the difference in training between a vet and a medical doctor. If memory serves me right I do believe a vet trains in both animal and human medication.
If there is a shred of honour left in the British State then arise Sir John Campbell.
When we are talking about 100s of millions of injections, "hardly ever happens" could be well into the millions.
1 in 3000 to 6000 jabs as an estimate. You do the math.
@@johmyh14 John suggested it could be 1 in 100. But who knows, if nobody actually aspirates then the number of known cases of puncturing a blood vessel is 0.
I was a nurse in the UK in the 80s and we were trained to draw back when giving IM injections. I guess things have moved backwards since then.
I work in a technology field, and i see similar things all over where things that use to be taken for granted.. that are still true, is no longer taught. Universities have generally gone downhill the last 30 years.
@@matsv201 "Building back better"; result = Shitain.
@@Cryptoversity build back better is shared by 5 or 6 diffrent leaders around the world. All get to shit
@@matsv201 Yes, I have lived in a few of them and watched them all rattling off the same line whether left or right wing puppet (displaying how left vs right politics is a distraction from real politics which is authoritarianism vs freedom). It's sickening, as if they think we are living in the 1800s and can't easily see them all singing fro the same hymn sheet.
@@Cryptoversity well.. it seams like the msm still have a grip of a majority of the population
"Fact checked" is simply a term for "does not correspond to state-approved narrative".
the fact checkers didnt start becoming a thing until people started questioning the narratives of corporations and doing their own research. They can't have people who know the truth, its bad for their scam.
@@chrisludolph348 Yup - part of the thought police system required with Marxism/Communism..
Very well put.
Yep. And you know what...the "fact checkers" on many occasions get the "facts" wrong! Problem is, you are still unable to stop them censoring your video or comment.
@@LondonSteveLee yes cause facebook is such a marxist/communist organisation - grow up
The reason they don't aspirate is because that would require some level of training and hinder the freedom of having cashiers at a pharmacy from giving us the jab.
WOW. Or, "mid-level" medical center employees enlisted to build vaccine "clinics" (T-shirts: 'VACCINE TEAM".......) (MY 3RD REASON for staying away)
I'm sure that the person giving me the vaccine had no or very little training!
lol
Well that’s bulldust.
They are advertising in pharmacy windows and at vaccine centres for people to be trained to give vaccines , enquire with in it says.
Makes any one who is qualified know the true meaning and value our government give to our qualifications doesn't it ? We might as well wear a witch Dr mask and shoot blow darts at our patients.
Congratulations! Met with my cardiologist this week, he talked about this too!
Here is where you can come and get information as it actually is.
*John* gets *ff* *uuuu* *c* *kkk* *e* *d* checked!
@@HeyHEY-fg9rp or get encouraged to vax because we know was this what got young male too get sick....
please also ask him how to naturally decalcify the arteries with vitamin d3 and k2 supplements..
I am an RN in the US and we were trained to aspirate with ALL intramuscular injections. Checked with current professors at the University, they said they still teach aspiration. I don't understand why they won't do it, aspiration just takes a few moments.
Because if they admit that they should aspirate then they've admitted they were previously wrong and expose themselves to liability for all the needles they didn't aspirate ie billions
True...me too;;it is what I was taught but the advisement from Pfizer etal is that aspiration is not necessary. I had not even thought of this getting vaccinated back in Jan and Feb...no aspiration was done. I will try to get it done for my booster
As a former heroin addict, I know once u hit a vein even without aspirating, there is visible blood that registers in the syringe and granted it’s not a lot, but it would still be easily viewed as blood is opaque and the vaccine is translucent so this seems like it could be easily corrected by whoever administers the shot.
I work in a vaccination centre. We were told not to aspirate because the Pfizer vaccine was too fragile to aspirate. This would not apply to AstraZenica but it is not aspirated either. In my initial training I was taught to always aspirate.
@@catherine7890 unbelievable
If this process saves the life of just one person then it's truely priceless... Thank you!
Imagine how many lives will be saved in total. God bless Dr Campbell
As an old school RN I insisted my injection be “drawn back” aka aspirated, prior to administering the vaccine.
At both appointments each nurse said “we don’t do that”. I told them my rationale and both happily drew back first.
I also had a screen shot of the clinical paper on my phone to show them.
What I don’t understand is why is there so much resistance to drawing back?? Is it medical hubris?
You’re an RN, but do we really want medical services to be provided a la carte like each patient is selecting options like they’re eating at a Subway or Chipotle? I can only imagine what kind of directions and printouts people would show their providers if that were normal.
@@Keithustus if demanding that each patient benefits the "best" they can do, in the actual state of our knowledge, is what you call "a la carte", what you are in other words advocating, is that "democracy", and the "public service" tax equality is meant to promote, should amount to everybody getting a bottom grade slip-shoden ill-treatment, so as to ensure that the most ignorant have the lead, because learning and progress being a never ending process, we have to STOP somewhere, AFTER ALL!!!
This is what bad treatment of civil servants for the last half century has obtained, an assumed, vindicative and self-defeating mediocrity!
This IS about occidental civilizations' doom....
They’re just stupid. Aren’t half of the nurses from the third world at this point? They’re literally just stupid.
@@Keithustus you clearly have no understanding of the risks involved in a supposed IM injection inadvertently becoming an IV injection…
It’s obtuse to compare correct medical procedures with the selections at fast food outlets.
IM injection allows the vaccination to be slowly absorbed into the bodies natural defence mechanisms where the antibodies are formed to recognise future foreign pathogens.
IV injection goes straight into the blood supply, veins, arteries etc and is circulated throughout the whole body where the vaccination can induce very severe reactions.
@@alexaelliott2598, false, I do understand them. We just don’t want nurses to think they have to check someone’s homework they bring them just before a medical procedure as a general rule.
This is akin to the discovery of hand-washing to reduce transmission of germs. So important. I hope others will sing this on the rooftops.
I was thinking the same thing! The original doctor who tried to influence others that hand washing was vital, was scorned because he presented it negatively "you are killing people!" It was a second doctor who presented hand washing as "Look what we can do to save lives!"
Diplomacy prevailed.
"Aspirate before you vaccinate"
should be on a tshirt Dr. John!!
What is it about this product...that is SO TOXIC... that if it gets into your blood stream, it can cause heart cell Apoptosis, ballooning degeneration of liver cells, and thrombocytopenia? It must have some really poisonous ingredients to cause such multi organ damage, if it gets into your blood. What's the chances of it getting into your blood?
add it to the banner in the background!
Jaap Smit - what.... my question? It's a bit long don't you think?
I think he was talking about adding the quote "Aspirate before you vaccinate" to the wall next to the banner in Dr. Campbells background
kyle bohannon - 😕😞😔😢.... I thought I was going to be famous.
You should go on Jimmy Dore's show. He is also a person who examines the accepted narrative and in many cases debunks and exposes misinformation.
I wanna give a thank you to a certain pothead comedian in California for getting me into this doctor. Good to see someone who isn’t afraid of people critiquing his work.
He's a nurse, not a doctor.
I've given hundreds of vaccinations and have never had flashback when aspirated.
If one has been trained well then it should never happen but we're not all built the exact same. Same parts and all but differences in build, weight, etc. can cause parts to be slightly off.
It takes a second to check. WHY skip this step? It makes no sense.
Does it make sense to bury an alleged covid victim without autopsie or cause of death?
Because in the uk hundreds of volunteers were drafted in. Some were retired medical staff, some were st johns ambulance staff (the folk that attend local sports events incase a grazed knee) and some were unskilled, trained for the job, no medical background volunteers. As long as it's free/cheap, it doesn't matter who doses the public, they're just collateral.
What is it about this product...that is SO TOXIC... that if it gets into your blood stream, it can cause heart cell Apoptosis, ballooning degeneration of liver cells, and thrombocytopenia? It must have some really poisonous ingredients to cause such multi organ damage, if it gets into your blood. What's the chances of it getting into your blood?
Amy Callis - well riddle me this....
Imagine an athlete.... for the first time, succumbs to the pressure of his corrupt coach and agree to taking an anabolic steroid injection to 'up,his game' a little bit.
The coach performs a PERFECT intramuscular injection..... aspirated properly.
A few days later... this ill advised athlete gets called in for a blood test and a urine sample.
Do you think this athlete is testing positive for steroids in his blood and his piss?..... OF COURSE HE IS!
The steroids.... injected intramuscularly....are now in the blood.... in the lymph.... passing through the kidneys and the liver.... passing through the heart.... and throughout the ENTIRE system.
The athlete is DEFINITELY a failing his blood test...that's for SURE.
So please Don't fall for this red herring.... this smoke screen.... to pass the blame for a toxic product.... from the manufacturers ONTO the administrators.
The product gets into the blood..... end of story.
And it's toxic to the blood.... capillaries and organs.
Some people can handle the toxicity.... and some people can't.
Some people will present with symptoms immediately..... and some people may take longer.... or may be lucky.
But many will be unlucky..... and that's NOT on.
The only reason to forego aspiration I've seen is to "decrease patient discomfort."
As a physician with over 50 years of experience, I have NEVER not aspirated injections of any type. To NOT aspirate, in my opinion, is malpractice. It takes about 3 seconds (at the most) to aspirate. This reflects what I consider to be a general deterioration in the quality of medical care in the United States.
Challenge everything if it involves bodily intervention. Credentials don't necessarily correspond with quality, knowledge, or vigilance. Statistics don't necessarily apply to any given individual.
I’m a nursing student in the US and since around 2016, aspiration has fallen out of favor.
@@amieagain2 In situations where injecting into a vessel can cause serious complications, like COVID vaccines, wouldn't the nursing profession be on top of that and pass on the importance of aspiration in this particular situation? If not, I would ask, why not? Why is it that nursing education and the nursing trade associations would be unaware of that danger? And if they're aware of potential complications and the ease with which it can be avoided, why wouldn't they pass that information on to students and practitioners alike?
@JJ Brewy911 Once that I can remember. The contents of the syringe with the blood need to be thrown away. You do not want to inject blood into a muscle as it is highly irritating to tissues. A new syringe and vaccine need to be used in an alternate site.
@@spidgeb3292 I wish I knew the answer to your questions but other aspects of medical education have deteriorated over the years based on my personal observations--like reliance on testing rather than a good patient history and physical examination. No longer healthy competition between doctors for patients. Big medicine, big pharma, big insurance--all bad. The individual gets trampled beneath bureaucracy. Government has made this worse.
So if aspiration results in blood in the syringe in, say, a conservative one in 10,000 shots, and the US has administered roughly 400,000,000 shots, that means that 40,000 people may have been subject to more severe side effects than necessary - that IS a big deal! Maybe those who deliver shots could offer to aspirate, and the babies amongst us could sign a document that they are waiving safety for pain reduction?
From pharma's and governments' perspectives, at $70 per shot (if what has been mentioned above is anywhere close), that's $2.8million for one country alone of product wasted. That's how they would see it. With zero liability for anyone in the manufacturing, distribution and administering of it, 100% of that is money down the drain for them. Multiply that on a global scale....
Asperating the injection looks like a very simple and brief step, that ensures safer delivery. One of the key principles of the Hippocratic Oath promises "first, do no harm or primum non nocere". Why would any medical practitioner take "any" unnecessary risk of jeopardizing the health and well-being of a fellow human being, especially during a pandemic?
All of us older nurses agree that all IM injections must be aspirated. Unrelated to what kind of injection it is. Reason for dropping this process unclear, but who is listening? Is anyone going to do anything about going back to correct IM administration!? Ministry of Health, CDC, FDA? Doubt it…
well riddle me this....
Imagine an athlete.... for the first time, succumbs to the pressure of his corrupt coach and agree to taking an anabolic steroid injection to 'up his game' a little bit.
The coach performs a PERFECT intramuscular injection..... aspirated properly.
A few days later... this ill advised athlete gets called in for a blood test and a urine sample.
Do you think this athlete is testing positive for steroids in his blood and his piss?..... OF COURSE HE IS!
The steroids.... injected intramuscularly....are now in the blood.... in the lymph.... passing through the kidneys and the liver.... passing through the heart.... and throughout the ENTIRE system.
The athlete is DEFINITELY failing his blood test...that's for SURE.
So please Don't fall for this red herring.... this smoke screen.... to pass the blame for a toxic product.... from the manufacturers ONTO the administrators.
The product gets into the blood..... end of story.
And it's toxic to the blood.... capillaries and organs.
Some people can handle the toxicity.... and some people can't.
Some people will present with symptoms immediately..... and some people may take longer.... or may be lucky.
But many will be unlucky..... and that's NOT on.
@@chrish9164 we are trying to stay away from conspiracy theories and other insanity. Spare us the lengthy explanation why vaccines are dangerous! Not going to fly, not on this channel. But IM injections must be aspirated because that is the correct way to do it. All medications that you administer will need to be administered properly. You will detect medication or anything else you take, no matter how you take it. Topical, PO, PR, or any other way. There will be certain level of absorption. You should not inject medication that is taken via rectum intravenously. Just to simplify. That is the main discussion. We are not discussing how “dangerous” Covid vaccines are. Kinda pass that line at this point 😂😂😂
Vintage Glee - I'm going on Campbell's recently cited scientific papers..... admitting that the 'product' causes "heart cell apoptosis"..... "ballooning degeneration of the liver cells".... "Necrosis of the heart tissue".... and "Thrombocytopenia"
Now that sounds pretty toxic (if it gets into your bloodstream)... because "ballooning degeneration of the liver cells" is a really snazzy way of a describing an EXPLOSION.... and Apoptosis is the medical term for cell suicide.
So I think we are all agreed that we do NOT want this stuff in our blood. Hence why the topic of aspiration is being discussed.
However, it is my belief that 'aspiration' is a red herring to divert attention AWAY from the toxicity of the product itself... and ONTO the administrator of the product (which I think is unfair.... and untrue).
For the reasons outlined in my previous post.... this product IS GETTING INTO THE BLOOD..... even with a perfect intramuscular application.
Your a nurse.... you should know all this.
Answer me this one question... is a steroid user - who administers a PERFECT intramuscular injection - going to fail a blood test? Yes or no?
When I got my moderna shot at a kaiser permanente facility in the US, I asked for it to be aspirated, and they refused, stating that if they did see blood they would need to discard the dose. This may be another instance of prioritizing group health vs individual health
This is exacly reason.
Odd when they seem to have no shortage of doses in the US!
Everything in this times is odd...
I'd like to no the rationale behind that.
The rationale being that a shot of vaccine worth $70 is more valuable than your physical well-being ? Nice !
It’s farcical that the “fact check” actually confirms the points made, and then provides a misleading conclusion…. Is this an elaborate satire????
'fact checking' doesn't mean 'disproving', it means what it says it means which is checking to see if the facts are correct or up to scrutiny. If i'm a maths teacher and i'm checking somebody's sums, it doesn't mean that by default that either some or all of their answers must be wrong. We are just checking to see if they are right.
@@gooseboy4025 that sounds right to me. However, if you check all their sums, and they got them all correct, and then you fail them…. That seems fishy. No?
I have just got back from having my Covid booster. Whilst waiting I was watching others getting theirs and saw no evidence of aspiration being employed. I asked the person administering mine if they would aspirate. They said they didn't know what I was talking about. I gave a very brief explanation. The person got very irritated and said they weren't trained like that and wouldn't be doing that today. I did have my jab as don't want to have to waste an appointment, have to make another and trail back again. But it was disappointing to discover this technique is no longer taught. ☹
Not all people who are administering vaccines are qualified nurses or doctors. Students in their second year of any science-based course, for example biomedical sciences were recruited in the UK to do injections.
Dr John, the glee on your face at the beginning of your video has made my day. You have done more to promote factual information than anyone else I have seen talking about covid. Thank you for all your hard work.
@Jack Rousseau There is not a single evidence suggesting that it originated naturally either. A lot circumstancial evidence actually do indicate the lab leak theory. We will never learn the truth with evident facts. Also, please tell me why Fauci did a 180 turn on this topic as well? I guess he is a crackpot conspiracy theorist for not ruling out this probability as well huh??
@Jack Rousseau
You're disingenuous. The media and Fauci ALL dismissed the theory immediately. Saying it's "just a conspiracy theory." "There is no lab leak."
@Jack Rousseau
Bruh. YT keeps censoring my comment and I don't even know what word triggers it.
@Jack Rousseau
How are you so pompous when you don't even even try looking things up?
All you had to do was search "research escape idea" (hint hint) and you'd get DOZENS of hits.
@Jack Rousseau
*MSN:*
_"The media called the ‘[escaped bug]’ story a ‘[C T]’ Now it’s prompted corrections - and serious new reporting."_
Paul Farhi, Jeremy Barr 6/10/2021
*CNN:*
_"[Escaped bug] theory is like something out of a comic book, virologist says"_
I actually sent it to Max Blumenthal as I had a direct line to him, and he was on Jimmy's show when Jimmy covered it 3-4 days later. Max is a fantastic journalist, and I was happy and surprised to see that Jimmy covered it! Jimmy even mentioned it at a live show recently, as Keith Oberman live streamed his booster shot experience, and Jimmy pointed out that the tech giving the injection did it wrong.
Yea, Jimmy has aligned himself with a few competent and honest investivative journalists like Max, Aaron and Glen, it's great.
Thank you for doing that, you provoked something valuable here Lol. . . Love to Max, Jimmy , and Dr John
Big fan of Max, Jimmy et al. Great guys doing great journalism in the US.
Great work ! Ive been watching both for a while
The tone of how you request that aspiration be used is important. We only have a few indications that accidental intravascular injection may be a contributing factor and mostly because the incidence of such injections is comparable to the incidence of adverse reactions. We can and should certainly ask why not try aspiration in case intravascular injection contributes to the problem, it's another to claim it's the best thing since sliced bread and stop the problem altogether. Overselling your request with unproven declarations is the surest way to generate resistance to your request as we saw with Hydro chloroquine and Ivermectin. You don't want to push an option into public ridicule before it can actually be investigated.
First thing a a student is taught when they start giving injections is to aspirate (both iv, sc and im ink). Why do some forget these most basic skills?
According to a lot of people, it's a generation divide. Old school method was taught to everyone, until recently (2010s ish? 2015?). Because according to the "new data," getting into a blood vessel is rare and not serious enough, and would waste a good dose-costing money.
It isn't "forgotten". The policy for deltoid IM injections is to not aspirate, in most cases.
I could tell you why if I were a doctor working in that field.
I'm a retired computer tech with plenty of time and reading skills so I could try to look up the answer. I have a little medical knowledge and am far smarter than most people. So I won't waste my time. I've been around doctors a lot and respect their competence.
For a non-expert to try to second-guess actual experts in their field of expertise is foolishness at best. But in the current environment, it is likely worse.
@@simonwhite8836
It IS forgotten... because the "new and improved" guidelines say the chances of catching a blood vessel is "exceedingly rare" and thus not worth the time or hassle or cost of a wasted injection.
When i saw your first video on this, i cried. Partly through sorrow for those hurt by the incorrect procedure, and partly through relief that my hesitation for this vaccine had been relieved, already knowing something wasn't right with the rollout.
Watching this again, makes me want to cry again, knowing the pain it's caused for people the world over, and yet people refuse to change.
If the aspiration before injection isn't made mandatory IMMEDIATELY, (seeing as mandates are all the rage nowadays) then prison time should be served, for those too arrogant to accept they are wrong.
Now they have no excuse 😡
Luckily for me, a senior nurse administered my 1st vaccine, before the vaccine I asked that the syringe was aspirated and she was more than happy to do this. When she aspirated she said there was no blood in the syringe and asked if I saw any blood and if I was happy to proceed (her bedside manner was amazing). Whilst waiting for the initial first few mins after the vaccine, she asked why I wanted it aspirated and I spoke about how the vaccine is for intra-muscular use only and by aspirating the syringe it eliminated the very rare chance of striking a vein or artery in the deltoid muscle. She then said that a team of anesthesiologists had come through and requested aspiration for the very same reason. Waiting for vaccine no.2 and will not get it if my request for aspiration is denied.
Where do you live roughly? TIA
the fact that some nurses will deny such a request is truly incredible
@@liamloxley1222 If it wasn't obvious, it's mentioned in the video at 14:39. Just means checking the tip of the needle hasn't hit vasculature.
An Amzaing Nurse!
#AspirateBeforeVaccinate
Well argued Dr John. The discontinuation of aspiration in nursing training over time is an example of how good practices can be ignored by neglect inadvertently. It does need to be reassessed. Congratulations on your successful argument.
well riddle me this....
Imagine an athlete.... for the first time, succumbs to the pressure of his corrupt coach and agree to taking an anabolic steroid injection to 'up his game' a little bit.
The coach performs a PERFECT intramuscular injection..... aspirated properly.
A few days later... this ill advised athlete gets called in for a blood test and a urine sample.
Do you think this athlete is testing positive for steroids in his blood and his piss?..... OF COURSE HE IS!
The steroids.... injected intramuscularly....are now in the blood.... in the lymph.... passing through the kidneys and the liver.... passing through the heart.... and throughout the ENTIRE system.
The athlete is DEFINITELY failing his blood test...that's for SURE.
So please Don't fall for this red herring.... this smoke screen.... to pass the blame for a toxic product.... from the manufacturers ONTO the administrators.
The product gets into the blood..... end of story.
And it's toxic to the blood.... capillaries and organs.
Some people can handle the toxicity.... and some people can't.
Some people will present with symptoms immediately..... and some people may take longer.... or may be lucky.
But many will be unlucky..... and that's NOT on.
What can explain the plethora of adverse neurological "events" or the almost immediate death following injection?
Perhaps an over-reaction to the onslaught of spike protein in COVID-recovered individuals. #screenbeforevaccine
In nursing school in Canada we are taught to always aspirate when administer IM injections. The nurses who administered my doses of Pfizer aspirated...I watched to make sure!
So in other words, countries, like UK and US that do not aspirate are literally playing Russian roulette ..... you have been saying this for ages and are now backed up ... PLEASE will the government now listen and take action!
No, because the plan isn't stopping the C...if it was, they wouldn't have went straight to a V with almost a 0% efficacy
no, because hand movement is not perfect you cannot guarantee aspiration doesn't change the position after the check, its luck regardless.
No please, not the russia arguments again..
Its not so bad. I mean if we can get rid of the gammon UK gov and US gov and their lobbyists, what's the harm. I mean face it. they've lied the world into 50 years of needless wars. I frankly don't care if they shoot themselves in the foot.
As I nurse myself and colleagues never understood why this guidance changed. I and many colleagues still continue to aspirate
Same here. Lesser manouvre is called here in Italy
Awesome to see you have such a positive influence on the world Dr John! You and Jimmy Dore and Mr. Leo all rule! Thank you so much for your incredible daily efforts.
I’ve wondered what was wrong with my first AZ jab. It went in low, about level with my armpit, and I could feel a pool trapped in there, and thought ‘haematoma’. Never had a jab hurt so much. That was feb 2021 and my arm is still not fully useable, in fact it’s getting worse again. Often can’t raise my arm. Catches me with pain. Had the next one in my leg!
I mentioned this to the kid who gives jabs at the grocery store pharmacy, and he looked at me like I was crazy. CDC better listen to you, John! I can’t understand why they are pushing back. They have anyone giving these jabs!
This is exactly why I have been following John and not missed a single video since the start of this pandemic! John you are a legend my friend everything you have said in your video's has made perfect sense and yes when myself and my wife go for our booster jabs I will too be insisting that the person giving us the jab aspirates! Thanks for all your time, knowledge and information John 😉👌😇😇😇😇😇😇
well riddle me this....
Imagine an athlete.... for the first time, succumbs to the pressure of his corrupt coach and agree to taking an anabolic steroid injection to 'up,his game' a little bit.
The coach performs a PERFECT intramuscular injection..... aspirated properly.
A few days later... this ill advised athlete gets called in for a blood test and a urine sample.
Do you think this athlete is testing positive for steroids in his blood and his piss?..... OF COURSE HE IS!
The steroids.... injected intramuscularly....are now in the blood.... in the lymph.... passing through the kidneys and the liver.... passing through the heart.... and throughout the ENTIRE system.
The athlete is DEFINITELY failing his blood test...that's for SURE.
So please Don't fall for this red herring.... this smoke screen.... to pass the blame for a toxic product.... from the manufacturers ONTO the administrators.
The product gets into the blood..... end of story.
And it's toxic to the blood.... capillaries and organs.
Some people can handle the toxicity.... and some people can't.
Some people will present with symptoms immediately..... and some people may take longer.... or may be lucky.
But many will be unlucky..... and that's NOT on.
Agree!
Okay, I've posted this three times and Dr John has disappeared it three times so I'll paraphrase: a report by one of the world's leading cardiologists, Dr Peter McCullough, says that this cannot be attributed to intravenous injection as the data shows the occurrence is heavily skewed towards young males, and after 2nd vx. I won't link to paper as it keeps being deleted.
alice keen - bang on target Alice Keen!
So is good to be jabbed or not
My grown son distains all YT bloggers as armchair warriors. Instead, refers me to Wikipedia, Fact Checkers, MSM, etc. to legitimise his point of view.
Bloggers like Dr's, Prof's, Phd's, Lecturers - they all get the same treatment. 'Aspirate before Vaccinate' will no doubt get poo-pooed while he checks his 'reliable sources'.
Wikipedia, deary me
Wikipedia... even high schools will tell you notto cite that lol
I did my nursing training in Switzerland in the 80s, and were taught always to aspirate. I have seen so many administrations of the vaccine in TV, some do, most don’t, made me think that perhaps this was no longer taught, I’ve been retired for some years now so no longer in touch. Thanks for your talks and tutorials, really interesting, that’s what is needed.
We are taught to aspirate in Canada. Both my doses were administered in the same way.
That's back when the politicians cared for their people as they WERE the people - now they're globalists hell bend on destroying/replacing European populations.
@@LondonSteveLee Why don't you just say what you mean...white populations.
@@AmandaMcKayJean Because telling the truth gets your account deleted.
@@AmandaMcKayJean US, UK is what hes talking about not Canada
Dismissing the need for it is to admit there is an acceptable number of lives you are willing to damage. And that's psychotic, because it's preventable.
Yes, it takes like 5 seconds to do this.
#AspirateBeforeVaccinate
Had my second AZ the other day in Melbourne Australia. Asked the nurse to aspirate and she said that she always aspirates - how else would i know that i did not hit a blood vessel. She is a young nurse
Great work Doc, I insured that my second shot was aspirated after seeing your original video on this and my family and friends have now been asking for this too.
To avoid all problems it is best to follow Bill Gates advice, "Wait a couple of years and see what happens" snicker snicker, chortle chortle.
As an RN and a physician, (unlike John), I have been outraged that no one has aspirated and that they are not being taught to do that!! Of course, there are side effects, and potentially really bad ones!
I wrote my Board of Nursing the first week right when I saw this being done WRONG. They were less than stellar in their answer They said to go by package insert...haha its blank.Weve alwys been taught to aspirate. ALWAYS. I asked aa MD at a university and a resident if it was still being taught to aspirate before injection on IM injections..YES its still taught as the proper way, I asked three different pharmacist and their answer was No they were told not to aspirate. FISHY BS going on with this whole pandemic.
possible many deaths too as a result..
I am sorry but the reason you may be having this problem of aspiration maybe because most Healthcare staff now realise the 'vaccine' is harmful..(ie full of harm) and do not wish to give it. Employment of 'nurses' has been on the rise all over the world as more and more real medically trained people see the effects of this poison. It is often slow in its manifestation and is I am afraid so far pretty irreversible though there ARE precautions you can take to help your compromised immune system...The main message is DO NOT have it under any circumstances and DONT ALLOW IT for children
@@wikedwhich1 😆🤣😂
@Eli OberoN yep. You know what’s ironic? More deaths from violence than Covid even comes close to. If even 10% of the resources we wasted on this virus were spent on eradicating illegal drugs (open border), gangs and a tougher criminal justice system we’d have saved countless lives. Why can’t mandates be laid out for folks to have cards listing their criminal history so that establishments can decide whom should enter their premises. We could demand all those with gang affiliations be treated as antivaxxers, and the same goes for anyone selling drugs or anyone having a single violent conviction. Wonder how our country would look like then?
It's beyond gratifying when peers of the calibre of Helen Petousis-Harris and Leo Nicolai validate what you have been championing all along.
Hopefully it will help the public demand that the people administering the vaccine actually perform aspiration and largely reduce any side effects.
Right#mysterybaba
Keep in mind that aspiration would only be avoiding a potential contributing factor in the adverse effects so we won't know for sure if aspiration would reduce the adverse effects till we try it. It's more a case if why not try it than a matter of knowing it would help.
@@johnwang9914 media smear out patient treatment by saying it doesn't prevent covid but what kory is looking into ivermectin etc is for treat covid symptoms to reduce stuff like death
during early stage of pandemic media with dnc smear out patient treatment idea+really hate travel bans but did lunar new year parades with riots promoting wait for ventilator
I'm a nurse AND a physician, and I always, always observe procedures done by nurses. I have always said to my senior consultants that I prefer to check before inoculating because a misplaced route is always going to be an issue.
I often remind them:
Right patient
Right drug
Right route
Right time
Right PROCEDURE
And the hospital is safer for it both for employees and patients alike.
Dr. John Campbell, I just wanted to say a huge Thank You to you for being there through this pandemic. My son and I have found you a constant source of information, that has proved to be invaluable and correct. The fact that you've highlighted this to "Nadeem Zahawi" and no action has been taken, is a lesson to us all. To the general public, one accidental death, is one death too many, but to the Minister for Vaccines, it's not a priority to save that one life, by admitting to the errors. You are a true doctor, with the "first do no harm" belief, written through and through you Sir. Many thanks for highlighting this serious issue, and let's hope the government changes their policy, before another person is harmed or even lost.
John I send this to all my nurse friends. My doc is about 50. I told him about your theory. He always aspirates. Good for you.
The efficacy lie.
Pfizer claimed 95.03% efficacy-Lancet study 0.84%
Moderna claimed 94.08 efficacy-Lancet study 1.24%
Janssen claimed 66.62% efficacy-Lancet study 1.19%
AstraZeneca claimed 66.84 efficacy-Lancet study 1.28%
@@theredboneking Sure.
@@SueProv sure, what?
@@theredboneking Doubt.
@@benjaminreynolds3659 Source is from the Lancet. Look it up for yourselves.
Great video John, I live in Thailand and was very interested in your original video. My wife had her second AstraZennica jab on Monday (11th October). I accompanied her and the nurse definitely did draw back. She observed blood and then abandoned that vaccination. She then picked a second sight about 50mm away on the same arm. My wife was a bit upset with this until I explained what had happened and the nurse had in fact done a great job.
Thanks for your great work.
😳
Has Denmark collected records of adverse events post vaccination? It would be very interesting to compare with countries not recommending aspiration before injection.
Government: "Fasten your seatbelts, strap on your helmets, it's for your safety, but it's okay when WE risk your lives :)"
Narcissism has never been so alive.
Another example of double standards when it comes to all the relevant topics at hand. On the one hand some things are being approved with the justification of it potentially being a means to help reduce the number of people who are hospitalized, all done so expediently in comparison to any practice ever seen in the field to date. On the other hand, something as "simple" as this (excuse the use of this term) that "could prevent side effects and harm to humans" is being questioned. Dare I say, it is not being implemented expediently as per the same justification used to approve and implement the initial medicines that have not had the years of testing prior to being implemented.
As you stated very clearly between the lines "our governing bodies will need to be held responsible for such double standards".
Thank you Doctor, my family has learned more from you here via your transparent and very objective videos than what we have learned via our governments in Australia. Sad but true, yet at the same time, I as a husband and father am very grateful for all the effort you are putting in to relay as much information as physically possible in the given situations. TY.
Stay safe,
God bless.
simple- removing side effects=less money
@@thedarkdragon1437 Just image the looks on all the greedy shareholders faces of the very expensive vaccines, if it solved the side effects of the very cheap at cost Non Profit AstraZeneca vaccine.
Spot on mate, Dr John is my trusted source. The only thing I look to from the VIC govt is the data and exposure sites to have an understand of where the virus has been and what the current numbers are. VIC govt and CHO have highly politicised this health issue. Not once have I heard Prof Sutton talk about the importance of having a healthy BMI, increasing fitness, boosting immune health, etc over the last almost 2yrs. The final straw was Prof Sutton referring to Ivermectin as a horse de-wormer.
@@task82 agreed. The denial of a peer reviewed theraputic ( American Journal of Theraputics) which has efficacy in conjunction with time honored protocols emphasizing early treatment including prophylaxis when entirely possible at scale and cost puts the entirely one sided experimental injection campaign clearly on the wrong side of this moral dilemna. Wagging the dog all the way. Poor dog. Poor us. It is turning into a shaken baby syndrome.
There is no money to be made by aspiration. That is why we do not do it.
John has been correct about so much right from the very start. That's why I've continued to listen and take his advice. He should have been advising the government
They only listen to lobbying.
Respectfully toward interesting they do not fact check Journalist or media Drs, why?
If you think the government has any concern for your well-being, I urge you to re-watch the events of the past two years.
He's not connecting the dots though. If he had, and was talking the whole truth to this many subs he would have been kicked off. I see him as a gateway rather than a gatekeeper though
@@Danntec what's the truth then?
OMG I LOVE IT!!! When being fact checked goes wrong!! 😂 I ADORE YOU!! Thank you 🙏 for all you do!! I’m from the states and not only did Jimmy Dore mention you but you have been mentioned on the Joe Rogan Experience #1 podcast! Please continue to gives us your knowledge! Cheers 🥂 Sir👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼😎❤️🇺🇸 🇬🇧✌🏼
Facebook's lawyers have come out to say that their fact checks are 'protected opinion' on the back end of them trying to fact check the British Medical Journal over their article regarding the Pfizer trials whistle-blower.
Keep doing the great job you are doing! Call things as you see them, and continue to back up your assessments with scientific analysis. I love your consistency in citing the articles and research, so anyone can read for themselves the information you are providing. Thank you for your continuing education of us all.
Thanks for posting all these videos John. I went for my second Pfizer dose in NZ and I asked the nurse, if it's all the same, if they could draw back before administration. They were happy to do this and I had an extra sense of peace about the whole ordeal.
While I'm here, I may as well let you know that your even keeled delivery of research-based evidence did amazing things for my anxiety levels back in 2020 when this whole thing was unfolding. Thanks for that.
Agree on the calming influence of Dr Campbell's videos during the worst parts of this Covid pandemic. This, the ZOE videos, and Independent SAGE (UK) on twitter.
Whereabouts are you in New Zealand and did you get your vaccine at a pharmacy or Medical Centre?
This is why this channel is such a gem. A competent individual that exploits his good analytic capabilities by gathering the (cutting-edge) information that is available (but dispersed) out there and laying it out clearly. Thank you Dr. John
Not very analytic. Squabbling over injection method, in order to work out why there are side effects. It's clearly just a distraction from the most logical true cause of side effects. The actual contents of the syringes.
@@zentamm Exactly!
@Blob Monster in his theoretical experiment nurse John did not suggest a control group where no vaccine was administered. So how would we ever know?
Well he ignores moderna extra risk research for months already
See SARS CoV-2 varients of concern and varients under investigation in England. Technical briefing 20.
A new report with detailed data from Public Health England provides some startling numbers. For the period of February 1 through August 2, there were COVID Delta variant cases for 47,000 people who had received 2 vaccine doses, and for 151,054 people who were unvaccinated.
In the first group of vaccinated people, there were a total of 402 deaths. In the second much larger group with more than three times unvaccinated people, there were just 253 deaths.
To get the death rate you divide the number of deaths by the total number of infection cases. That gives a death rate of .86 percent among the vaccinated and .17 percent among the unvaccinated.
That is an amazing difference. The death rate among vaccinated was just over five times greater than that for the unvaccinated.
I learned this as a veterinary technician in the '90's here in the US. Trained on the proper way to administer both IM and IV injections in animals and why. I was taught to ALWAYS aspirate for any medication or vaccination given IM.
I was an EMT in the 80's. We were taught to aspirate the needle when giving ANY IM injection.
Why? Just to make sure you weren't hitting a vein. Duh.
edit: I gave flu shots as an EMT in the National Guard but not as a civilian EMT. Sorry for any misconception's.
@@erikarommel I was an EMT in the Md Army NG in the mid 80's and we did give flu shots and things of that nature. Sorry for leaving that part out (: But yes, as a civilian EMT, we weren't allowed to give any injections.
@@erikarommel thanks Erika for the come-back!
I am so glad this is getting the publicity it is getting. I was so so thrilled to hear you when you did the video. Being a retired nurse I had wondered about the same thing seeing patients g ed tting the jab. I noticed there was no aspiration. I guess I felt vindicated when you made your video. Thank you so very much. Love your videos!
well riddle me this....(due to the fact your a retired nurse)
Imagine an athlete.... for the first time, succumbs to the pressure of his corrupt coach and agrees to taking an anabolic steroid injection to 'up his game' a little bit.
The coach performs a PERFECT intramuscular injection..... aspirated properly.
A few days later... this ill advised athlete gets called in for a blood test and a urine sample.
Do you think this athlete is testing positive for steroids in his blood and his piss?..... OF COURSE HE IS!
The steroids.... injected intramuscularly....are now in the blood.... in the lymph.... passing through the kidneys and the liver.... passing through the heart.... and throughout the ENTIRE system.
The athlete is DEFINITELY failing his blood test...that's for SURE.
So please Don't fall for this red herring.... this smoke screen.... to pass the blame for a toxic product.... from the manufacturers ONTO the administrators.
The product gets into the blood..... end of story.
And it's toxic to the blood.... capillaries and organs.
Some people can handle the toxicity.... and some people can't.
Some people will present with symptoms immediately..... and some people may take longer.... or may be lucky.
But many will be unlucky..... and that's NOT on.
@@chrish9164 I am under the impression that injecting into muscle tissue means that much of the injection will then get into the lymphatic system rather than the circulatory system.
Fishofgold6 - in the lymphatic system.... the blood.... the urinary tract.... everywhere.
That's why this is a red herring. Their trying to divert attention away from the product causing damages.... and deflect blame onto the poor administrators.
@@chrish9164 Who do you mean by "they"? And if "they" wanted to divert blame away from the vaccine itself and onto health workers, the big "they" would not be silent on the matter of syringe aspiration, as they currently are.
Fishofgold6 - you asked who I meant by 'they'..... then answered your own question in the next sentence.
And yes... they would be silent... because 'they' want the people to feel they have come up with their OWN answer.... their own crusade. Far more powerful. If 'they' claimed it... they'd have to prove it. (Much more hassle)
Why the heck would you believe this fairy story.... when you can see higher prevalence of adverse reaction in PARTICULAR age and gender demographics. (Higher prevalence of Myocarditis in adolescent men.... and higher prevalence Thrombocytopenia in middle aged women)??
Do you HONESTLY think that it's mathematically rational to assume a CORRESPONDING higher prevalence of accidental intravenous administration in those particular age and gender demographics?
Dr. Campbell has seen it twice in his career with extensive knowledge of technique and anatomy. How often is this happening with the many thousands of techs with minimal training - how many jabs are going in too low, too high, too deep or not deep enough?
He estimates 1 in 3000-6000. He did a quick poll about this, and it suggests that some people are more at risk than others. A body builder giving himself steroid injections, hits a blood vessel about 1 in 30 times. Youth growing up and people with well trained muscles might run a risk somewhere in between 1 in 30 and 1 in 3000 times. Also, he's right that if it happens 1 in 10000 times, that's one time too much since it is so easily preventable!
@@mjouwbuis Makes sense this is happening more often than anyone is willing to officially admit.
Yes, every person's arm is different...just aspirate and problem solved....simple
many complications and deaths after taking vaccines could be caused by this simple problem
I have met someone who got nerve damage when an injection was placed too high in the shoulder. It's so painful and it takes six months to heal.
The cross-section of veins in young males could be greater than that in others because of more robust vascularization.
Facebook had to admit in court that their fact checks are only opinions.
Dear John, i did ask the nurse and the doctor present in the vaccination point to aspirate for my third / booster dose (i got 2 AZ, and the 3rd was Moderna) and the answer was, yes, this is how we do it in Hungary anyway! And thats how they she did it, i looked carefully. So, interestingly, in Hungary it seems to be the protocol. Now, being a Hungarian, i would not be surprised if this in fact was not followed in many places, plus many data on the pandemic is hardly available because of the very nature of our government, so i doubt Hungary would be a help for further investigating this issue, but i meant to mention it to you anyway.
well riddle me this....
Imagine an athlete.... for the first time, succumbs to the pressure of his corrupt coach and agree to taking an anabolic steroid injection to 'up his game' a little bit.
The coach performs a PERFECT intramuscular injection..... aspirated properly.
A few days later... this ill advised athlete gets called in for a blood test and a urine sample.
Do you think this athlete is testing positive for steroids in his blood and his piss?..... OF COURSE HE IS!
The steroids.... injected intramuscularly....are now in the blood.... in the lymph.... passing through the kidneys and the liver.... passing through the heart.... and throughout the ENTIRE system.
The athlete is DEFINITELY failing his blood test...that's for SURE.
So please Don't fall for this red herring.... this smoke screen.... to pass the blame for a toxic product.... from the manufacturers ONTO the administrators.
The product gets into the blood..... end of story.
And it's toxic to the blood.... capillaries and organs.
Some people can handle the toxicity.... and some people can't.
Some people will present with symptoms immediately..... and some people may take longer.... or may be lucky.
But many will be unlucky..... and that's NOT on.
lol only 3 vaccines? what are you trying to kill as many grandmas as possible? come back after your 19th shot, rookie.
It's not just the nature of your government, it's the nature of all big social media and news outlets that are for the first time in ages do a joined censorship of correct information.
See SARS CoV-2 varients of concern and varients under investigation in England. Technical briefing 20.
A new report with detailed data from Public Health England provides some startling numbers. For the period of February 1 through August 2, there were COVID Delta variant cases for 47,000 people who had received 2 vaccine doses, and for 151,054 people who were unvaccinated.
In the first group of vaccinated people, there were a total of 402 deaths. In the second much larger group with more than three times unvaccinated people, there were just 253 deaths.
To get the death rate you divide the number of deaths by the total number of infection cases. That gives a death rate of .86 percent among the vaccinated and .17 percent among the unvaccinated.
That is an amazing difference. The death rate among vaccinated was just over five times greater than that for the unvaccinated.
I am just wondering how would they know if the injection reinserted after aspiration won't hit a blood vessel ?.
Do aspirating countries have less side effects?
Also wouldn't a younger man have bigger muscles that might need bigger veins and arteries. This would make the chances of inadvertent IV injections higher, giving rise to more side effects in this age and sex bracket?
Good idea!
The reason might be even simpler: young males might have a higher tendency for having larger blood vessels than young females.
Personally, I know many men who had some prominent enlarged vein (on the commonly publicly shown body parts: face, neck, arm, or legs) before the age of 20, but no woman who had one before the age of 25. I know that the lowest level of evidence is "anecdotal", but still this explains why I have a hunch that Dr.C is really onto something!
I consider that obesity may play a part as well for some that get inadvertent IV injections.
I thought about that. But all the nurses I know have been aspirating for years on any routine IM injection. So, I can't see why this step is ever skipped.
Obesity, or a later of fat between the skin and the muscle, caused obese people to have to be injected with longer needles in my country. (NL)
@Kate surely aspiration reduces a potential risk factor.
Thanks so much John for your channel and your efforts to promote the truth and educate people around the importance of aspiration when administering the vaccine.
I went to receive my first dose of moderna a couple of days ago at a local chemist.
My polite request for aspiration was met with refusal so I walked out and went to our city's large vaccination center.
I asked to speak with a senior nurse, explained my concerns and she was quite accommodating, although her role was to coordinate the other nurses there she was happy to administer my shot herself - correctly (you would've been proud of her)
The following day took my 17yo son there, upon his registration at the center I asked to speak with the same nurse, she asked around and found another experience senior nurse who would comply and directed us to wait outside her booth with instructions to ignore all other staff members (all amid some very disapproving stares from them - I suppose we weren't behaving like the compliant sheep as expected)
It all went smoothly and I watched as she correctly and skillfully administered the vaccine.
Thanks again John, you're doing a great job.
This is significant advice---i will forward the clip to friends/family. Thank you for your dedication to serving the community.
Thank you John.
A voice of reason, in a time of madness.
There are many such voices, but the commercial news organizations earn money by creating chaos and premature emotional reactions to headlines. Without Jimmy Dore this would never have happened. He is not always interpreting everything 100% correct, but he always has a point and propagates content that's questions partisan orthodoxy. This helps to keep liberals and conservatives and their bs in check.
The Dore is often dumb but he did do a good thing here.
Well done again, Dr. John. You've been well ahead of the curve on so many issues, from the outset. Thank you.
You crawled all the way up there, didn't you?
Oddly I'm so pleased to see a bottle of Quink again, I haven't seen one of them in years.
We need more of discussions such as this, by openly disecting subjects like this, complete with challenges and responses positively and negatively, we all learn and end up better off. I'm glad to see UA-cam contributing to such discussions, by not censoring them, like some other platforms have been doing.
Hi John I'm a retired registered nurse who trained in the mid 1980's in the UK. Prior to becoming an RGN I worked in medical research facilities. The majority of my clinical practise was in A&E, high dependency units and intensive care units for the first 20 years of my 30 year career. As you can imagine I spent a good deal of time training junior members of staff and student nurses. I also worked for St John Ambulance Brigade and the Red Cross as a trainer/examiner so that I have experience of trying to give best practise training to those without the background knowledge and experience to evaluate their own practise.
'In my day' it was standard practise to aspirate when giving intramuscular injection and frankly were I giving these vaccinations I would do it as a matter of course, I would have no issue giving a defence of my actions based upon experience and training - ie I can self-evaluate my practise. The question is: Are the volunteers giving vaccinations so instructed? Even though I hate to have to say it, cost effective practise is a consideration outside of ideal practise. Teaching someone to aspirate an IM injection is easy, teaching them what to do in the event of a blood flashback is not quite so easy... not impossible.. but not a negligible concern when considering the expected workload.
Playing devil's advocate here:
If a patient was asking specifically for me to aspirate I would simply ask.. 'Would that make you feel more comfortable taking the vaccine?' If the answer is yes and since there is no contra-indication to aspiration I would then advise that in the very unlikely possibility of blood flashback I would have to withdraw the needle and re-administer at another injection site (this potentially raises infection control issues - discussed later) thus warning them of the possible change to expected outcome. One small prick while you look away and it's done versus having to take time to talk to them about the very tiny possibility of two needles and seeing their own blood in the syringe because they are checking if I did aspirate, all while others are watching and listening. A factor in concordance is also that I want them going home or to work and telling everyone 'Oh it was easy, done in seconds and out'.. not... 'Oh my God! He spent 10 minutes explaining all the possible rare occurrences... just in case and there were lines of people getting frustrated an annoyed outside!
This adoption of universal aspiration would possibly not lend itself to 'speed training' and speed administration to large volumes of people, this is not an attempt to abrogate responsibility for good practise rather simply pointing out the cost benefit of the sheer rarity of accidental intravascular administration and the incidence of adverse reaction even in those cases of accidental intravascular administration. I have given many tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands of IM injections, I can't remember ever having had a blood flashback, what I can say from training the public is that they tend to remember what they have seen on TV before they remember what you told them once in a training session. How many times have you seen a syringe drawn up and it's contents sprayed into the air on TV? If I was training volunteers I know this would be one of my main areas of concern. Trust is an important factor, imagine if out of the blue the person administering the vaccine said to the person sat nervously waiting to get it over with.. Sorry I have to give you that one again. Imagine if you saw that and you were the next in line?
I'm sure the cost of discarding the initial vaccine syringe after blood flashback and opening a new one for a new administration site would not be considered prohibitive, changing the needle even less so, but the practise of simply taking the needle out and shoving it back in at another site would require some amount of training in injection site safety regarding potential needle contamination and the safe handling of a now potentially blood-borne vector in that syringe which could be accidentally sprayed into the environment by improper handling. Generally patients don't like needles, they probably wouldn't like to be injected twice. There is a psychological aspect to best practise, it is not completely unheard of for a patient to pass out at seeing their own blood... or even just a needle. Volunteers already have to absorb a fair quantity of more likely scenario information in the ?short time? allotted for training.
Is it likely that the practise of aspiration was abandoned because of it being so rare meant the extra time taken to advise of the possibility of alternate site re-injection might likely cause the patient more distress and confusion and raise the risk of improper administration by failure to adhere to best infection control practise and/or the need for extra time training those administering the vaccine in such infection control practise edge cases. You feature those who ask for aspiration, what about those who don't and aren't expecting the possibility of two needles when they were shaking at the knees at the thought of just one? it takes longer to train someone to deal with a potentially anxious person than to train them to just stick a needle in as quickly as possible.
I have watched your videos and found them to be an invaluable source of information over the last few months and for that I thank you very much, sincerely, but I would like you to consider when you read the somewhat triumphant testimonies of those telling you they had it out with the professionals administering vaccinations at speed, that although they were statistically at no higher risk of adverse reaction than anyone else walking through the door they took perhaps 3 - 5 times longer to deal with, at least one of them is rather pleased with the idea that he drew a crowd and caused a fuss in a hospital, how many people walked out of that hospital deciding not to get vaccinated because of that 'fuss', we'll never know. I'm sure you could extrapolate the ramifications of that... Would the rate of vaccination slowdown have been worth it given the tiny amount of adverse reactions if your advice to viewers had been taken en masse and significant numbers of them slowing down vaccination rates? I understand the professionalism of giving optimal service and advice, and you are to be commended for your dedication to it, but I ask you please try to view the people doing the spade work on the ground more sympathetically. It was the worst of times.
My personal feeling: Aspirate and have at least one clinically trained person to supervise at all sites. Is that practicable? I don't know, I wasn't the one making the decisions or the arrangements to vaccinate tens of millions of people in a very short time period in manner never attempted before. The two people who administered my vaccinations at my local small pharmacy were not trained professionals. I wasn't the one testing volunteer training methodology and advising the government on it. You have the benefit of hindsight, they didn't, they had no idea that thrombocytopaenia was a risk when they devised and organised that training in this very specific use case scenario of mRNA vaccine administration. Did it go as planned? What are the findings of any internal reviews? What were the rates of vaccination administration per minute? How many of those administrations would have not passed 'in hospital' acceptable practise for professionals standard?
In my view these are not considerations for an emergency, they are something to reflect on after the fact once the desperate work has been done. Let's not forget it was an amazing triumph of coordination and cooperation from top to bottom in less than ideal circumstances with many thousands of people, volunteers and professionals alike, knowing that they put their own safety at risk for the benefit of all. I have worked in many hospitals around the UK and I have the utmost respect and gratitude for the highly trained dedicated professionals who are part of infection control teams who have through sheer hard work and dedication changed outcomes for an untold number of patients and saved a lot of healthcare staff's lives in the last 30 years. If they saw a good reason to dispense with the need to aspirate on standard IM drug administration I'm absolutely sure it was based on years of evidence based practise taking into account all factors and in consultation with all concerned agencies including the HSE. This very edge case scenario of a relatively few adverse reactions to the vaccine came of of the blue barely a few months ago.
Hopefully future training will be at a slower pace and build on that which came before, perhaps this would be a way to approach the government and it's attitude to aspiration and best clinical practise? You have people in your comments section questioning medical and nursing practise based solely on this very small edge case scenario, I know that adverse reaction to 'standard drugs in hospital' due to accidental intravascular administration was vanishingly rare when compared to the number of accidental needlestick injuries to staff. I can see perfectly good and valid reasons to drop aspiration for IM injection in standard clinical practise training - pre-pandemic
you wrote a book , but gave a new point. risk from the blood. to infect nurse, a tool could be used to hold syringe maybe to lessen that risk , cooler version would be it holds arm and motors computer do all the work. if blood needle out and into new place. l thougt this can not be a woman , sir , seems im righ.
Dear John, how interesting that Denmark 🇩🇰 again acts as a good example. It was Denmark that was instrumental in getting insulin needle lengths changed - in order to avoid insulin going into a muscle and absorbed too rapidly and causing hypoglycaemia in a person with diabetes. The needles used caused life-threatening severe hypos especially in a lean person like a young child. Those of us diabetes specialists who tried to change this practice faced a lengthy and antagonistic period - but it lead to a complete change of the insulin injection protocol, supported by Becton & Dickinson (leading needle manufacturer). Of course, now in insulin pumps the needle is absolutely minuscule and ensures subcutaneous delivery of insulin as indicated by the drug manufacturers. My driving impetus came from having a four-year old child, our youngest daughter, experiencing the vagaries of such oblivious practice. Thank you so much, John! When I go to get my booster dose, I will request the person to aspirate before injecting!
there is ongoing debate on the length of epipen's syringes. Sesame seed hummus aside, why not have varying size needles for body types, the end user is "trained" to use it to some respect, the variation would be clear. may I ask if you plan on taking a booster indefinitely ie for along as you have it provided, or as long as dr cambel is picking up more revenue through UA-cam than he has possibly seen his entire career. or perhaps for as long as the friendly news stations plaster all the "cases" that are current on your home planet.
Imagine how long it takes to get a message through for a none important issue. This system is bad for communication purposes and if anyone in government was really following the science, they would already have addressed this from the get go. Keep it up John, you may be one of very few voices.
On average 17 years before medical studies etc are mainstreamed , so we are way behind .
Aspirate before you vaccinate-this needs to be the CDC’s mantra
I drove my adult son to get vaccinated today. I am in British Columbia Canada. I asked if the nurse would use the aspiration method and he said no. They dont do that here because there is a danger that it may suck out the vein? What the hell? What kind of bullcrap is that? I was outright lied to today.
If the authorities come out and say oh, we weren't doing it right, and this was the main cause of the cases of acute reactions, but now we know going forward, maybe it could rebuild some of the lost trust people have rn. If we admit and make clear and upfront that there have been mistakes, but that we've solved the main problem, and then prove it, people that are afraid of the jab might be less so. Idk. Our leaders need to have humility and accountability :/
We dont even know if our leaders took it.
@@patrikpass2962 its a moot point
They're making too much money to care. Half these idiots have shares in big pharma. They also will *never* admit fault. Dont expect humility and accountability from politicians.
It would be more likely that they might come out with something like "Due to new information, we now reccomend..." or "In order to be extra cautious, we now reccomend..." thereby covering their assets...
#AspirateBeforeVaccinate
This is the most reasonable move. I appreciate your view!
My veterinarian ALWAYS stressed how important it was to aspirate needles when giving IM injections on my horses stating how dangerous (even though unlikely) it could be to inject in a vein!
It all depends on where the injection is given; the human deltoid muscles have no veins. Heck - we aren't even horses.
Yes, let's apply everything we know about horse health to covid. Brilliant. The reasons are many and obvious. If a medicine kills worms in a horse why on earth would it not work for an completely unrelated condition in humans? Quack quack quack quack quack quack quack..........
@@josephblowhard1659 What you are really saying is:
1.) A medicine which is used for horses can't work for humans.
2.) A medicine that works for desease A cannot work for desease B.
Each of these claims is complete and utter BS. Not to mention that all of this has nothing to do with the OPs statement.
@@wbaumschlager What I am saying is that QUALIFIED MEDICAL EXPERTS have already taken the time and trouble to tell you that you are WRONG. Stop playing. This isn't a joke. Get the shot and shut up.
@@josephblowhard1659 You are hallucinating on three different levels at once.
Dr John: does giving the jab with the additional aspiration step introduce any possibility of new errors or issues with administration? Many thanks for your logical mind!
I'm happy I sent you the different original papers. I tried to compare the frequencies of myopericarditis in Denmark (as they've changed their guidelines) to other countries. I did not find a detailed report on the danish site unfortunately.
Dr. Campbell NEVER gives any misleading info-he is meticulous about giving accurate details with references. Much better than any other source I’ve watched or read. He is a hero during this pandemic!! Everyone loves him for his dedication and transparency! If he ever gets censored then I’ll know for sure something is really wrong with big tech and whoever is behind this censorship!! We want the truth and Dr Campbell is reporting only facts!!!
This Jimmy Dore guy is a well-confirmed grifter. He scoops up uneducated Americans who've opened their eyes just enough to be scared away from the Republican party and he tries to lock them into what mainstream American politics consider 'moderate' political positions.
tsensuke The care y pandemic, you know the one making so many people sick.
@@tsensuke5259 look around. Be aware. Refuse to be blinded by misinformation. Check and double check and read the referenced articles. Watch something in addition to Fox News. And when you choose to, #AspirateBeforeVaccinate
@@tsensuke5259 A pandemic of corruption.
@@jacobunderwood4957 He ain't called John 'Grifter' Campbell for nothing. Anyone who promotes the jabs, especially if they're in the medical field is a sell out shill.
The problem is that they are giving 6wks basic training to anyone who wants to vacanate from all walks of life, you don't need to be an NHS nurse or an ex NHS employee, Maybe if we all refused the vaccine untill they asperate , they may begin to listen.
@qtsssim yeah l suppose they will, of course I'm not suggesting that we all start demonstrating outside of vaccination centres holding placards and shouting Aspirate before you vaccinate I wouldn't dream of it, I'll have another think 🤔
I have family and friends in other European countries and they could not believe when I said that in UK you don`t have to be medically trained to give covid shots. They also could not believe that here you can do covid tests at home and send them via post
This is spot on. A worldwide vaccination program requires a lot of workers, many of whom won't have proper training. Pay to get a professional to inject you, if you can
And how long does it teach to aspirate? A few minutes over the 6 weeks.
@@timsmith894 If you want to protest, do it soon before you get put in jail for "creating unease" (the new Tory law definition of a criminal act of protest).
Thanks, John, for your hard work. I am living in SA and you are one of the first specialists to give proper insights and analysis. Thank you so much.
I was reading a cdc guidance about vaccination procedure. It said there is no need to aspirate but then when questioned about what to do if the nurse aspirated and blood shows up it said the vaccine must be discarded resulting in a waste of expensive vaccine which could have been avoided if the nurse didn't aspirate. I thought that was ridiculous
I really enjoyed how much joy it brought to you that this was substantiated. That’s how change happens. I’m sharing this!
Given there's still quite a lot of vaccine hesitancy you'd think any measure that might give further reassurance would be adopted without hesitation.
I think they prefer name calling and shaming at this point
Lol it’s not a vaccine for starters. I would say that contributes a fair bit towards so called “vaccine hesitancy”. If it was a vaccine and prevented infection as well as transmission, the uptake would have been overwhelming. As it stands we have a treatment here that essentially does nothing AND comes with additional risks, that is being pushed on us via 24/7 fear p0rn.
riddle me this....
Imagine an athlete.... for the first time, succumbs to the pressure of his corrupt coach and agree to taking an anabolic steroid injection to 'up his game' a little bit.
The coach performs a PERFECT intramuscular injection..... aspirated properly.
A few days later... this ill advised athlete gets called in for a blood test and a urine sample.
Do you think this athlete is testing positive for steroids in his blood and his piss?..... OF COURSE HE IS!
The steroids.... injected intramuscularly....are now in the blood.... in the lymph.... passing through the kidneys and the liver.... passing through the heart.... and throughout the ENTIRE system.
The athlete is DEFINITELY failing his blood test...that's for SURE.
So please Don't fall for this red herring.... this smoke screen.... to pass the blame for a toxic product.... from the manufacturers ONTO the administrators.
The product gets into the blood..... end of story.
And it's toxic to the blood.... capillaries and organs.
Some people can handle the toxicity.... and some people can't.
Some people will present with symptoms immediately..... and some people may take longer.... or may be lucky.
But many will be unlucky..... and that's NOT on.
@@unicornadrian1358 The "treatment"? The vaccines prevent you from dying, you might get sick, but you wont die. That's not "nothing" as you pit it. Or is that the value you put on your life, "nothing"? What a sad man
@@unicornadrian1358 It prevents most serious illness and death. Have you got a better option? Isolate yourself completely, or get vaccinated. Be safe.
Even most bodybuilders injecting exogenous hormones know to aspirate when doing so lol.
I found it interesting that they stopped using the Astrazeneca vaccine in Canada because it rarely happens (and it seemed to be predominantly younger females) in favour of Pfizer mRNA. But then the down-played the rarity of the Pfizer issues. I say "follow the money". Astrazeneca is so much cheaper. The big Pharma puts lots of $$$ into their marketing spins.