@@javierlatorre480 Live your whole life deceived if you want. But the reality is that the Earth is flat, with a firmament (solid, hard) above and water above that firmament. Everything else is Photoshop and CGI. Read the Bible to know the right worldview and the Truth. The Truth will set you free.
MCBVictoriaTX I mean what I wrote. Read it again. A localized intense reflection over one small area of the clouds. This would not be possible if the sun were 93 million miles away and the sun's light rays all hit the Earth parallel to one another (as scientists claim).
Another flat-liner without balls. You have the ability to spam and harass videos like this, but I never see you cowards taking on THE WEATHER CHANNEL, a hotbed of ball Earth, satellites, and so ON. ROTFLMAO....you poor pathetic trolls.
@@harryandruschak2843 it's all bullshit.cause we do live on a flat earth covered by a dome and the moon and sun is in the dome with us.government are trying to fool everyone but some of us know the truth.GOD is real.flat earth is REAL dome firmament is real
Then try screenshotting and drawing a line between the ends of the horizon, you will see a clear bump in the middle even when the horizon is perfectly centered
I can see quite a clear curve - both left-right, and down and away from the viewpoint as it rises and new features appear over the horizon. I can also see the Sun rising from behind the line of the horizon, which means the surface must have enough hump or curve to it to conceal the disk of the Sun at least.
Excellent 🕊 Thank you for sharing 🤍 I`m waiting for someone to point the camera upwards.. would be interesting.. and would be great to see the entire footage, without edits 💜
So if it was spinning at 1032mph were are the 1000mph winds ? Or if the atmosphere also spins with the earth why do we have different speed winds blowing opposite from the so called spin.
1: The entire atmosphere is spinning. 2: The rotation of the earth does not cause much change of speed of the wind(see answer 1). Wind is caused by different temperatures causing higher or lower pressures. When there is an area of low pressure (cold air), air in an area of higher pressure (warm air) will move towards the area of lower pressure. Creating wind. 3: Air closer to the surface tends to move more directly with the speed of rotation of the earth. When an area of high pressure is in the east and low pressure on the west, the air will move opposite the direction of the rotation of the earth.
@@Bendigo1 so the atmosphere does not spin with the eathb does it .? If it was spinning we would need more fuel to fly against the spin? But in fact the same amount of fuel is required flying east or west ( not counting jet streams )
@@JudaismIslamUnited Wind is caused by the atmosphere moving around. But the atmosphere is also spinning along with the earth. If the atmosphere was not spinning along with earth, we would see the 1000mph winds at the equator, and near zero wind speed at the poles, and increasing speeds from the pole to the equator.
@@JudaismIslamUnited You seem to have gotten it backwards on this last comment. If the atmosphere spins with the Earth then it's _relatively_ stationary with respect to the surface, so there aren't gonna be huge fuel costs in attempting to overcome 1000mph winds. Of course, this is just the simplest part of the equation
This helps show that the Earth is a circle as the Bible describes and not shperical . When camera angle is down it curves upward which gives it that ball look but when the camera angle is up the putter lining curves as if A DOME FIRMAMENT IS ABOVE COVERING THE EARTH !
Notice how every time there’s a video like this, we never see anything else in space like space debris or satellites or stars everywhere and we see a local sun instead
@@TeslaNick2 do you know the difference between horizontal and vertical? There’s only a curve horizontally. on the flat earth model, they have the curve horizontal
I love when they don't use fish eye lens to make these videos. If on the video cover the earth is shown with a curve then I not even watch because I know there is distortion of the lens
@@teclo1057 no... I am talking about the map of Earth YOU personally own and use to find places and get turn by turn directions to any city on any continent. That map. What's the name of it?
@@tjjones621 it's a totally different map to the one you use. You know, the one you created yourself based on your own travels and your own eyes. Or are you using the one that somebody else told you was accurate, and you just took their word for it?
@@teclo1057 I am using the map YOU use... What part of that do you not understand? Besides, you expect me to take your word for the additional lands. Hypocrite!
Nick Vevang Not true. The evidence for a flat Earth is non existent. The flat Earth model cannot explain a lunar eclipse since the sun and moon are always above the surface of the Earth. Plus the Earth has two celestial poles, which proves that we live on a sphere that rotates.
+arculete Yes, thank you...of course it did. The footage was clear on that aspect. My question pertained to tracking. Given the round trip was over an hour and the falling camera could have easily landed anywhere -- miles away -- I am curious about how they knew where to find it. Did they stand around gazing up at it all morning...hoping to catch a glimpse of it falling later on? This is an incredibly difficult task. Low altitude model rockets are one thing. This balloon is completely different. Did they have some kind of beacon on the balloon? Did they get any help from the FAA? etc.
+Search4TruthReality We had two separate tracking devices carried with the balloon (so that if one failed, we'd still have the other!). Radio and GPS signals from these trackers helped us know where the balloon was; one of our curators had a laptop in his car and followed along roughly underneath the balloon, at least where roads made this possible. (He did actually see it fall from the sky!) Meanwhile, the public could follow live tracking online, through the site habhub.com. This site provided real-time altitude, speed, temperature, etc. We also did our best to live-tweet updates: twitter.com/mcb_tx (#spaceballoon). We did notify the FAA of the project, so that they could communicate with aircraft in the area that a balloon was present. Before the launch, we used a prediction website to estimate the balloon's path (based on wind/weather forecasts), and made sure to launch from an area that was not near an airport, and which would not send the balloon near an airport or heavily-populated area to land...or into the Gulf of Mexico.
It’s beautiful! I highly doubt if anything was to actually leave or return to earth that it would burn or cause fire or flames to appear. After all aren’t temperatures at that height pretty cold? Looks beautifully safe from here!
air resistance is a funny thing one second you're able to freeze gaseous iron next one you see plasma by the windows peeling whatever material was on them atom by atom at at a rate of 1g of material per second
Umm... Yes, pretty cold but I can light a fire quite easily when it's -40° outside. When something is within the lower part of earths atmosphere it's not traveling fast enough to catch fire. When things come in from outside earths atmosphere or the upper parts of the atmosphere, they're traveling 15-20+ thousand miles per hour! That's 4+ miles per second. That creates a TON of friction when it hits the air in earths lower atmosphere.
+WeAreChange Manchester We wanted to see the view as it would look without the distortion of a fish-eye lens...as if you were riding with the balloon (although obviously no humans were launched!).
+WeAreChange Manchester I think it's amazing that you *can* see curvature from homemade projects like this! As high as the balloon went, it's still relatively close to earth, so the curvature is still pretty slight from this perspective. It's a beautiful viewpoint.
+WeAreChange Manchester You can see a slight curve, which is all that you will see from that altitude, since the Earth has a diameter of over 7900 miles (12,742km).
Could you please tell me at what second you see a curvature because I can't see any. And another question, what is that in the sky, the Moon or Venus (0:23-24, 0:29, 0:37, 0:52)? What day was it so we can calculate Sun and Moon (or that object)position? Surprisingly the celestial object disappears in the stratosphere.
+Carmen C Here are some places with curvature: 1:14, 1:16-1:42. If you're having trouble seeing it (because it's pretty subtle), pause the video there and lay a straightedge from the two points where the horizon intersects the left & right edges of the frame. You'll see a bit of curvature of the earth over the top of the straightedge. It's not much, but remember that the balloon is some 20 miles up, compared to the almost-8,000 mile diameter of the earth -- you have to get much higher up to see more curvature, because of the sheer size involved. I believe that the bright object you noticed is the moon. I looked this up, and the moon was a waning crescent on the launch date, and it would have risen in the east at around 3am. You can see that the bright object is eastwards, since it's near-ish the rising sun. So that's my reasoning there. The date of the launch was early on August 12, 2015, from Van Vleck, Texas, westwards to Victoria, Texas. The times are included in the video.
+MCBVictoriaTX Thanks for the answer. Would you load up the full movie? I am really interested to see how the Moon vanishes from 6:16 to 8:00 am. According to timeanddate.com the Moon is over Mauritania and the Sun over Niger. It' s amazing. I still don't agree with the subtle curvature, I think there is some distorsion specially when the camera moves more, but when it stands still in front of the sun reflex the horizon is straight. Kind regards.
You're welcome! The whole raw video file from the camera is HUGE -- 2+ hours of high-definition footage. It's not in a format that we can easily upload to UA-cam.
@@MCBVictoriaTX I really can't see any curves but perspective and cloud density up there, not to say it's not curved, but puting cars up there is nonsense, we need a non commercial flight up there asap to put this to bed, I used to be all for nasa but too much lies now, so lean towards a controlled earth and from a higher intelligence that created all this, whether it's flat or spherical...it does look round tho as in circluar! As the same as the moon looking down towards it, always showing the same face? Anyway Peace great vid 👍
@@javierlatorre480 I can see through the moon during the day,for 48,000 miles away it sure looks a lot closer.Maybe couple thousand miles instead what they say
@@matthewfrank6962 "I can see through the moon during the day." Have you considered that the Moon looks blue during the day because the sky is in front of it?
There is a curve, SS in the most highest moment. Put a straight line in the image beside the earth line, then reduce the width of the image by a large amount. You will see the curve very clearly
If your height of 112,906 ft is correct, you have broken the world's record for the highest weather Ballon of 105,000 ft... according to Google, also, our earth is definitely flat.
@@GREEKKINGG I'm telling you because clearly you didn't do even the bare minimum research and just latched onto the first number you found, even though (or probably BECAUSE) it contradicts what you just saw. And no, I recommended the ruler because I DID find curve with it. A constant curve at the highest elevation regardless of the camera angle.
@@javierlatorre480 might want to check your eyes if you see curvature. You're making yourself see something that's not there based of your bias beliefs of the Heliocentric theory that's been force feed to us growing up. It's gotta curve somewhere if it's a spinning ball and they claim ships go over the horizon at the beach yet even from 20 miles high there's still no curve, it's only prospective, if it was a ball, then the horizon at 1:50 would be "lower" and not even with the viewing prospective. Be honest with yourself , I know its hard to beleive you were deceived but wouldn't you rather know the truth? Google photos of earth from space and notice they are all cgi composites. The ball earth is a fantasy.
@@GREEKKINGG No, I see curvature because I went out of my way to measure it by literally sticking a ruler on the screen to compare with and not only was the horizon curved with respect to that ruler, but the curve was constant for that entire segment of the video. Notice that none of the ones taken during Apollo are composites, nor are the ones taken by all prior missions. Notice that Apollo predates the very existence of CGI. For someone who complains about being force-fed a narrative, you sure ate up a lot of really easily debunkable conspiracy drivel and are trying to regurgitate it verbatim.
Hotspot, ie thing whose existence for some unexplained reason (magical thinking) "disproves" evidence that even flat earthers can tell destroys flat earth.
The sun is not ..........billions of years away from us, he is just far away from where we are located, there is more land beyond that horizon that we can't see at naked aye
@@manl6575 It becomes a question of what goes on in their heads. Are they lying? Is it too subtle for them to see? Are they so motivated by the premise that they feel the need to assert themselves?
@@javierlatorre480 I am not sure about that bro, i think that there is some thing in their unconscius part which is going to deny every curvature that they have show to them no matter how visible it is
Call me a troll if you like, but that doesn't give this place any curvature. There would be a fixed horizon if I climbed in elevation and that fixed horizon would drop below eye level as that altitude is gained if the ball model was correct. Instead, the horizon rises with the eye. You could put a ruler or yardstick on that flat, eye level horizon and the distance that can fit within it increases with altitude. You don't have to climb very high at all before the spherical trigonometry gets completely destroyed. A line was drawn a long time ago, and you chose poorly. You may "know not what you do", but that unfortunately makes you the enemy today. The enemy is huge. The enemy outnumbers me. But I have a secret. The awareness is like an opened box that can't be closed. I call it the Ark. You won't beat the Ark. Have a nice day.
@@michaelglendinning1738 How can you tell the horizon is "rising with the eye" in this video if the camera is swinging around wildly? Also, I have, personally, measured the dip in the horizon, and it exists. First I measured from the top of a hill; the dip was tiny but detectable with a bottle of water to use as a reference for level. Sometime later I repeated the observation from a plane and the dip was far more noticeable. So instead it's pretty clear that you're just wrong. If you genuinely believe this stuff then you're not a troll but you are definitely, factually, incorrect on this. Also I got a ruler and measured a curve in the horizon on this video as well, so.
@@javierlatorre480 watch Dwayne Kellum's amateur balloon footage. He doesn't use fish eye lenses. Some of his launches go to 220,000 ft. His balloon launches turned him into a Flat Earther. We don't pretend to know what this place is; we only can prove what it is not. I have done a lot of plane travel in my 48 years here. The horizon is always eye level, regardless of which window you choose to look out of. It is checkmate for the ballers, but that indoctrination everyone received as children is hard to throw away. I can lay out provable tests for hours straight and still not convince most. And cognitive dissonance is another animal all together. The ball slowly loses over time. The awareness moves slow; but hell should be slow.
Is it common for the balloon to pop at approximately 110,000 feet? I just watched the same thing happen in a different video. Is that what happened and if so, what causes it?
As the balloon rises in the atmosphere, the atmosphere gradually becomes thinner, i.e. the air pressure drops. At ground level, the external pressure of the atmosphere equalises with the internal pressure of the balloon. But as the atmospheric pressure drops as the balloon rises, it provides less resistance against the internal pressure of the balloon, so the balloon gradually swells up more. Eventually the balloon just swells to the point that it pops. At 110 000 ft the atmospheric pressure is roughly 1% the pressure at sea level.
It's the various gases in the atmosphere and sunlight's various wavelengths that gives us the typical blue colour. When you're up in the higher reaches of the atmosphere, the concentration of these gases becomes less and less with altitude, to the point where no blue is being created, eventually coming to the point where no colour is being produced at all, hence the darkness.
@@sailorman8668 Sunlight reaches Earth's atmosphere and is scattered in all directions by all the gases and particles in the air. Blue light is scattered in all directions by the tiny molecules of air in Earth's atmosphere. Blue is scattered more than other colors because it travels as shorter, smaller waves. This is why we see a blue sky most of the time.😁
You say on a video with proof of curvature... Visible measurable convex horizon below the center of the lens once the altitude is high enough.Which btw is the case for not just this video, but every single high altitude balloon video.
@@Sealedservant sure thing, show me a high altitude balloom video where it never turns convex from launch to landing while below the center. I'll wait.
@@aculmamun This camera saw a slight bit of curve and it wasn't fish eye. If you ever take a flight yourself, snap a picture of the horizon, then squish it horizontally to exaggerate the curve.
@@CAMlCAZl yes, hence the term "looked close" meaning "in my opinion". It's ok, you have the public school system to explain your lack of understanding
@@stevenbrown5210 oh I understand, was just trying to figure out if you actually thought it was close or not like some people think it is. Which it obviously isn't.
@@TAFTurkishAirForce Show the footage of curve at 30k feet or else you may be taken as the liar. Besides, curve is the absolute least of the host of problems the Flat Earth has
So, at 112,906 ft, the balloon suddenly popped, sending some white stuff flying, and started falling back down. Did it hit that famous Glass Ceiling Hilary Clinton is always talking about....
Nope! It popped because the atmospheric pressure at that height was extremely low and couldn't counteract the internal pressure of the balloon. Also, Hillary's glass ceiling is a well known figure of speech, you dummy, and it's about disadvantaged groups like women, not a literal glass ceiling over the Earth. Which of the two does it make more sense for Hillary to be talking about? Also don't you think 113 thousand feet is a little too _low?_
Another idea for photographing the ice wall is to go to South Africa and hold a camera up to the sky again and we will see the wall clearly but on a clear day without clouds.
If you triangulated the Sun using several observers across multiple latitudes, you would get different results from everyone if they all used your method. Not a good sign for your point
@@CAMlCAZl Um no! lol You are totally incorrect. The curve of the horizon in this video is caused by the lens. Proper cameras with proper lenses, have been launched all over the earth. The earth does not have curvature. The lack of curvature is proven beyond all doubt.
@elyjahstark7549 We've gone over this already lmao. Weren't you claiming fish eye at some point just to be a contrarian? Edit: Well if he literally can never address what I say, safe to say he's not worth anyone's attention.
@@tjjones621 Nobody knows the shape of the earth...all educated guesses. The danger with educated guesses is that you'd try to squeeze every phenomena into it even when it's falling apart right before your very eyes. First prove that the earth rotates. Then prove the sun is 93 million miles away. Then prove how a zoom camera can see details of stars beyond 4.2 lightyears away. Then prove why westbound flights don't experience shorter times relative to eastbound flights with a factor of 1,038 miles/hour. And please don't hide behind the excuse of a vehicle and its atmosphere as common sense tells us that the system cannot be the same as if it were not spinning in one direction. Gracias!
@@ekulenwaiku4654 Neither of us can prove anything about the stars. We have no first hand knowledge. We both rely on what others tell us. I am willing to admit it, can you? But, you and I both know the shape of Earth. We both use the exact same map of it. There is no guessing. We can both find any place on Earth and get turn by turn directions to any city on any continent. No mater what the shape, can you admit you have a map of Earth?
@@adaminkoluabartmiyorum30cm jesus is much more than a prophet.he is the word in human form in other words he is GOD himself.and every knee will bow down to him every religion is not the same.allah is the devil not GOD..its about relationship not religion
Did the Bible ever mention the Firmament's height or whether or not the Sun was inside it? Why does the Bible even matter in this discussion when there is a visible curve in the video?
@@elgallitodelpalenque3152 Good luck proving either of these things because I see a curve in this video and no dome; again, the balloon popped because of a lack of external air pressure
@@msidc1238 as big as the sun supposedly is and how far it supposedly is, the sun should be shining a bright light on the entire earth (assuming the earths flat). Now if the earth has curvature, then the sun should be shining a bright light on a much greater distance then just that one little spot. Open your mind and try relearn everything you been taught by doing your own experiments. Stop taking NASA’s and governments word for everything, haven’t they lied to us enough? Seek the truth,
@@theman563 It is shining on the half of the planet. If you have ever looked at a reflective floor you would see that even though the entire room is lit, the reflection of the light is only a small little spot on the ground. It is simple logic.
FE is just a silly prank. The only reason it's even a thing at all is because there are so many gullible people out there... That's the real scary part.
@@JudaismIslamUnited Hearsay, present your evidence here and now in the form of measurements , data points , equations. All laws of physics are presented in mathematical/geometric language to ensure consistency. Provide unambiguous definition of horizon and "eye level" and formulate your claim properly. BTW a video from 36km altitude on a 40,000km planet is pretty useless. Try 1,000km or 10,000km. And there are all sort of video/photographic evidence Earth is not flat so you can't use a special pleading for your video evidence, can you?
Fact: theodolites, which measure perfect level, disagree with you. Also I'm pretty sure you can't claim the horizon rises to eye level on videos like this one where the camera is moving all over the place, or on fisheye videos with the horizon below centre frame
Horizon is perfectly flat and motionless. No noticeable spin nor orbit. Just a flat motionless earth to live on. If you wanna call everything in the firmament space im ok with that.
If you've seen the horizon, you have personally witnessed the curve of Earth. There is no horizon on a flat endless plane. The FE meanies lied to you. Firmament is correctly translated expanse. Sure sounds like space to me. A really really big expanse. Don't let them damage your understanding of Scripture too.
I mean…it would be impossible to see it spinning from a camera in the atmosphere. The Earth spins in a span of 24 hours, that’s really slow for us… and we wouldn’t be able to “see” an orbit either, as it takes 1 year for the Earth to orbit the sun. We spin with the Earth, and even though the camera is being carried by the balloon, it’s all being moved by the Earth too. You can’t see something spin if your on it. It would appear to be still. Think about it like a spinning teacup ride in an amusement park. If your riding in the spinning cup, the cup will look still to you, as you’re sitting inside it. But everything around you (outside the cup) will look blurry and distorted because your sinning. With the Earth spinning so slow, we have to record (on camera) the night sky, and then we would need to speed up the video; we would then see the sky moving. But it’s just like the tea cups, the Earth is spinning with us on it. So the Earth itself will never “move” in our perspective.
Funny, there is no horizon on a flat endless plane. Do you really think you are seeing the edge on the other side of Antarctica in that vid??? If so, how come planes don't just fly over there and take a look?
You have been duped to INSTANTANEOUSLY believe, memorize and regurgitate everything that scientism tells you!! Acclaimed PHYSICIST NDTYSON ADMITS that you cannot see the curvature of the earth at 60+ miles in altitude!! ua-cam.com/users/shortsvjnLJtBtVeE?feature=share
The sun rotates around the earth from east to west at a height that varies from 130 to 160 kilometers depending on the season, at a speed of approximately 1500 kilometers per hour. The sun moves following the tropics: when the sun is on the Tropic of Cancer, it is summer in our part of the world and winter in Australia, and when it is on the Tropic of Capricorn, it is winter here and summer in Australia. When the sun is on the equator, we experience spring or autumn. We don't always see the sun in our part of the world because its light gradually fades in our atmosphere, which has an average propagation speed of light of about 3·10'8 meters per second. This speed is higher than the average propagation speed of light in water, which is about 1.26·10'10 meters per second. In an ocean, light begins to lose its frequency/strength at a depth of 150 meters, due to the greater density of water (997 kg/m³), which creates darkness at a depth of 200 meters. In our atmosphere, the propagation of light is greater and can travel up to about 6,000 kilometers (depending on the season). In summer, however, the heat causes water to evaporate, which reduces visibility due to what is called the atmospheric visual block. The blue color of the sky during the day is due to the sun's radiation on our atmosphere at a concentration of 0 to 20 kilometers, gradually reaching an altitude of about 40 kilometers before fading among other lighter elements such as helium. Above the sun, there is only darkness, with the exception of stars, due to the absence of an atmosphere. The red color of the sunset is due to the frequency of light, which decreases as it passes through the atmosphere. The closer you are to the sun, the higher the frequency of light (1005-1035 THz 380-790 nm), while the outer edges of the solar halo have a much lower frequency (400-484 THz 625-740 nm), creating the red color. The sun does not actually set, but rather appears to do so due to the perspective created by our atmosphere, which acts like a magnifying lens. The illusion of the sunset can be observed by looking at the sun in the sky during winter, as it appears to shrink while moving away. This lens effect is also observed with the moon, which appears larger at the horizon during summer and smaller at the zenith, with a difference of up to 20%. The law that holds everything up is based on density and specific weight. For example, an apple falls to the ground because it is denser and heavier than air, but it floats in water due to its density and specific weight. Gravity, as it is commonly described, does not actually exist. Our weight is due to the density of our bodies, which is positioned between the earth and the air (human body density: 1040 kg/m3, air density: 1.225 kg/m3, ground density: 1800 kg/m3). Additionally, the weight of the atmospheric column above us (about 1000-1500 kg depending on the season) pushes us downward. When we go up a mountain, our weight decreases by a few grams because we are in a lower atmospheric column. The sun needs to be low to function.
@@delayedcreator4783 density is a force, Archimedes' law proves it, this works in both negative and positive (up and down)! Moving matter creates energy!
@@emilianoantonini9375 Archimedes' principle only works on the principle that the medium being displayed is denser, therefore heavier, than the object displacing it, to generate positive buoyancy. In other words, it depends on the materials' weight. Meaning it depends on gravity. Also Archimedes quite famously stated: “The surface of any fluid at rest is the surface of a sphere whose centre is the same as that of the Earth.”
@@javierlatorre480 No sorry! look... objects fall or rise vertically not due to a 'force of gravity', but due to the difference in density between the object itself and the surrounding medium. An object more dense than medium will tend to fall downwards, while one less dense will tend to rise upwards. For example, a stone falls through the air because it is denser than air. These motions also depend on the absolute density of the medium: with the same density difference between the object and the medium, the motion will be slower in a denser medium, due to the greater resistance encountered (e.g. a balloon in water rises more slowly than in 'air). Furthermore, Archimedes' law states that an immersed body receives an upward thrust equal to the weight of the displaced fluid. This helps explain buoyancy and suspension. In summary, in this alternative model, falls and vertical motions are explained by relative density, media drag and buoyancy, without invoking the existence of a 'gravitational force'."
Cool! Cool! Cool! Level horizon! The Earth is Flat! Good job brother!🤗👍
Get a ruler
Roundness is not the same as sphericity. What you see here is the roundness of our flat Earth.
Wake up!!!!
@@jesus4400 Cope
@@javierlatorre480 Live your whole life deceived if you want. But the reality is that the Earth is flat, with a firmament (solid, hard) above and water above that firmament. Everything else is Photoshop and CGI.
Read the Bible to know the right worldview and the Truth. The Truth will set you free.
@@jesus4400 Seethe
Also, explain how the Sun can set if the Earth's not a globe
How is it possible to have such an intense hot spot on the clouds? That shouldn't be possible if sun is 93million miles away.
What do you mean by "hot spot"? The reflection of the sun off the water of the Gulf of Mexico?
MCBVictoriaTX
I mean what I wrote. Read it again. A localized intense reflection over one small area of the clouds. This would not be possible if the sun were 93 million miles away and the sun's light rays all hit the Earth parallel to one another (as scientists claim).
Another flat-liner without balls. You have the ability to spam and harass videos like this, but I never see you cowards taking on THE WEATHER CHANNEL, a hotbed of ball Earth, satellites, and so ON. ROTFLMAO....you poor pathetic trolls.
kpn5000 ... amen brother
@@harryandruschak2843 it's all bullshit.cause we do live on a flat earth covered by a dome and the moon and sun is in the dome with us.government are trying to fool everyone but some of us know the truth.GOD is real.flat earth is REAL dome firmament is real
I didn't see any curve what so ever! It definitely looks flat to me!!
Then try screenshotting and drawing a line between the ends of the horizon, you will see a clear bump in the middle even when the horizon is perfectly centered
Maybe use your eyeballs and a straight edge ...unless seeing the evidence with your own eyes is a bit too much for your ego to take 😂
Totally FLAT
I can see quite a clear curve - both left-right, and down and away from the viewpoint as it rises and new features appear over the horizon. I can also see the Sun rising from behind the line of the horizon, which means the surface must have enough hump or curve to it to conceal the disk of the Sun at least.
Drink 3 - 4 beer and you can see the "curve"
Excellent 🕊 Thank you for sharing 🤍 I`m waiting for someone to point the camera upwards.. would be interesting.. and would be great to see the entire footage, without edits 💜
So if it was spinning at 1032mph were are the 1000mph winds ? Or if the atmosphere also spins with the earth why do we have different speed winds blowing opposite from the so called spin.
1: The entire atmosphere is spinning.
2: The rotation of the earth does not cause much change of speed of the wind(see answer 1). Wind is caused by different temperatures causing higher or lower pressures. When there is an area of low pressure (cold air), air in an area of higher pressure (warm air) will move towards the area of lower pressure. Creating wind.
3: Air closer to the surface tends to move more directly with the speed of rotation of the earth. When an area of high pressure is in the east and low pressure on the west, the air will move opposite the direction of the rotation of the earth.
@@Bendigo1 the atmosphere is spinning?
Is wind made out of atmosphere?
@@Bendigo1 so the atmosphere does not spin with the eathb does it .?
If it was spinning we would need more fuel to fly against the spin?
But in fact the same amount of fuel is required flying east or west ( not counting jet streams )
@@JudaismIslamUnited Wind is caused by the atmosphere moving around. But the atmosphere is also spinning along with the earth. If the atmosphere was not spinning along with earth, we would see the 1000mph winds at the equator, and near zero wind speed at the poles, and increasing speeds from the pole to the equator.
@@JudaismIslamUnited You seem to have gotten it backwards on this last comment. If the atmosphere spins with the Earth then it's _relatively_ stationary with respect to the surface, so there aren't gonna be huge fuel costs in attempting to overcome 1000mph winds. Of course, this is just the simplest part of the equation
How far away from launch did you pick it up want to do this myself so wondering how much cost and pieces
Same here. How to do it myself
If you look up the MAGE2 balloon project you can find videos about how that similar project was built. It cost about $1,000
Best video yet. thank you
It's flat, the horison. Thx, great job
This helps show that the Earth is a circle as the Bible describes and not shperical . When camera angle is down it curves upward which gives it that ball look but when the camera angle is up the putter lining curves as if A DOME FIRMAMENT IS ABOVE COVERING THE EARTH !
Notice how every time there’s a video like this, we never see anything else in space like space debris or satellites or stars everywhere and we see a local sun instead
Not in this video it isn't. This video clearly shows curvature, proving you are a liar.
@@TeslaNick2 do you know the difference between horizontal and vertical? There’s only a curve horizontally. on the flat earth model, they have the curve horizontal
@@diantepatterson8042 if it was flat, we would have been able to see a lot more of the planet than that. Nice try though.
Thanks for sharing, it sure looks beautiful up there :-)
It looks so flat ikr
@@teo4860 Shut up the earth is not flat 😂
Come on people that’s bloody flat just admit it 🤯🤯🤦🏻♀️
@@leahfarrell352 cant explain how sunrise and sunset work
@@leahfarrell352
100% fact.
Awesome video! What date was this balloon launched on? I'm trying to determine how high the sun is in the sky relative to "sunrise" at ground level.
That is a brave cameraman
I love these videos. It debunks all the lies that NASA tells us.
Not even close, my guy
You can literally see a curve lol 1:42
On the contrary
@@PoIarism the roll of the camera
@@PoIarism its pretty flat man. take off your fish eye goggles and you will see only flat.
I love when they don't use fish eye lens to make these videos. If on the video cover the earth is shown with a curve then I not even watch because I know there is distortion of the lens
Better yet: you can just make out a bit of curvature while the balloon is at its highest. Not exaggerated, not distorting and turning concave
everyone knows flat earth don't curve
@@dedgzus6808 Then this is not flat Earth
@@javierlatorre480 obviously
@@javierlatorre480 wrong
Fact: It Reach A Maximum of 112,906ft (34.4137488km or 21.3837121mi)
Why did it burst..? What made it burst..?
The earth is flat. No curve
Get a ruler
land beyond the ice ring blows my mind, how much bigger is earth really?
what land? it's not on your map of Earth...
@@tjjones621 dont you mean that its not on your map
@@teclo1057 no... I am talking about the map of Earth YOU personally own and use to find places and get turn by turn directions to any city on any continent. That map. What's the name of it?
@@tjjones621 it's a totally different map to the one you use. You know, the one you created yourself based on your own travels and your own eyes. Or are you using the one that somebody else told you was accurate, and you just took their word for it?
@@teclo1057 I am using the map YOU use... What part of that do you not understand? Besides, you expect me to take your word for the additional lands. Hypocrite!
33,772 views for a video of this awesomeness, and some tic toc shit gets millions. How.
That’s society for ya today 🤷🏻♂️
The human attention span is a fickle thing, unfortunately
Because tik tok is all entrainment. People wants to be entertained
No Earth Curve.
Мы бы никогда не увидели эту красоту, спасибо за труды!
great vid
and a nice hotpot under the sun , and earth looks flat to me :)
thank you
+QNFee The Earth is big, so the curve is slight, but yet visible in this video.
+AbuserTube wide angle lense
***** What's your point?
Nick Vevang Not true. The evidence for a flat Earth is non existent. The flat Earth model cannot explain a lunar eclipse since the sun and moon are always above the surface of the Earth. Plus the Earth has two celestial poles, which proves that we live on a sphere that rotates.
Sun isn't flaz
Can you tell us about how the camera was tracked and recovered? The altimeter indicates it landed 80' above the ground. Thank you.
+Search4TruthReality it stoped in a tree
+arculete Yes, thank you...of course it did. The footage was clear on that aspect. My question pertained to tracking. Given the round trip was over an hour and the falling camera could have easily landed anywhere -- miles away -- I am curious about how they knew where to find it. Did they stand around gazing up at it all morning...hoping to catch a glimpse of it falling later on? This is an incredibly difficult task. Low altitude model rockets are one thing. This balloon is completely different. Did they have some kind of beacon on the balloon? Did they get any help from the FAA? etc.
+Search4TruthReality We had two separate tracking devices carried with the balloon (so that if one failed, we'd still have the other!). Radio and GPS signals from these trackers helped us know where the balloon was; one of our curators had a laptop in his car and followed along roughly underneath the balloon, at least where roads made this possible. (He did actually see it fall from the sky!) Meanwhile, the public could follow live tracking online, through the site habhub.com. This site provided real-time altitude, speed, temperature, etc. We also did our best to live-tweet updates: twitter.com/mcb_tx (#spaceballoon).
We did notify the FAA of the project, so that they could communicate with aircraft in the area that a balloon was present. Before the launch, we used a prediction website to estimate the balloon's path (based on wind/weather forecasts), and made sure to launch from an area that was not near an airport, and which would not send the balloon near an airport or heavily-populated area to land...or into the Gulf of Mexico.
@@MCBVictoriaTX how far away did this land from the launch site?
@@MCBVictoriaTXawesome task. Thank you
Did you get the equipment back.and how far away from the launch site did it go?
Yes, that's how they could post the video. DUH!!
@@jupiter6647 ???
Ya it couldn't be a direct live feed loser
It’s beautiful! I highly doubt if anything was to actually leave or return to earth that it would burn or cause fire or flames to appear. After all aren’t temperatures at that height pretty cold? Looks beautifully safe from here!
air resistance is a funny thing
one second you're able to freeze gaseous iron next one you see plasma by the windows peeling whatever material was on them atom by atom at at a rate of 1g of material per second
Well education is a funny thing.
Umm... Yes, pretty cold but I can light a fire quite easily when it's -40° outside. When something is within the lower part of earths atmosphere it's not traveling fast enough to catch fire. When things come in from outside earths atmosphere or the upper parts of the atmosphere, they're traveling 15-20+ thousand miles per hour! That's 4+ miles per second. That creates a TON of friction when it hits the air in earths lower atmosphere.
@@anopoabednego6173 even a single air molecule becomes a grain of gravel at fast enough speeds, like when objects descend at mach 6
Haturnuhun pisan parantos kagungan video sapertos kieu, sim kuring ngaraos bingah tiasa ningali na.
How come you didn't use a fish eye lens like the rest of them??
+WeAreChange Manchester We wanted to see the view as it would look without the distortion of a fish-eye lens...as if you were riding with the balloon (although obviously no humans were launched!).
MCBVictoriaTX so have you any thoughts on the seeming lack of curvature?
+WeAreChange Manchester I think it's amazing that you *can* see curvature from homemade projects like this! As high as the balloon went, it's still relatively close to earth, so the curvature is still pretty slight from this perspective. It's a beautiful viewpoint.
+WeAreChange Manchester You can see a slight curve, which is all that you will see from that altitude, since the Earth has a diameter of over 7900 miles (12,742km).
You can't kid a kidder...
1:33 distance of 93205678 miles...
Yep
Could you please tell me at what second you see a curvature because I can't see any. And another question, what is that in the sky, the Moon or Venus (0:23-24, 0:29, 0:37, 0:52)? What day was it so we can calculate Sun and Moon (or that object)position? Surprisingly the celestial object disappears in the stratosphere.
+Carmen C Here are some places with curvature: 1:14, 1:16-1:42.
If you're having trouble seeing it (because it's pretty subtle), pause the video there and lay a straightedge from the two points where the horizon intersects the left & right edges of the frame. You'll see a bit of curvature of the earth over the top of the straightedge. It's not much, but remember that the balloon is some 20 miles up, compared to the almost-8,000 mile diameter of the earth -- you have to get much higher up to see more curvature, because of the sheer size involved.
I believe that the bright object you noticed is the moon. I looked this up, and the moon was a waning crescent on the launch date, and it would have risen in the east at around 3am. You can see that the bright object is eastwards, since it's near-ish the rising sun. So that's my reasoning there.
The date of the launch was early on August 12, 2015, from Van Vleck, Texas, westwards to Victoria, Texas. The times are included in the video.
+MCBVictoriaTX Thanks for the answer. Would you load up the full movie? I am really interested to see how the Moon vanishes from 6:16 to 8:00 am. According to timeanddate.com the Moon is over Mauritania and the Sun over Niger. It' s amazing. I still don't agree with the subtle curvature, I think there is some distorsion specially when the camera moves more, but when it stands still in front of the sun reflex the horizon is straight. Kind regards.
You're welcome!
The whole raw video file from the camera is HUGE -- 2+ hours of high-definition footage. It's not in a format that we can easily upload to UA-cam.
I understand, thank you!
@@MCBVictoriaTX I really can't see any curves but perspective and cloud density up there, not to say it's not curved, but puting cars up there is nonsense, we need a non commercial flight up there asap to put this to bed, I used to be all for nasa but too much lies now, so lean towards a controlled earth and from a higher intelligence that created all this, whether it's flat or spherical...it does look round tho as in circluar! As the same as the moon looking down towards it, always showing the same face? Anyway Peace great vid 👍
Send up a balloon when the su and moon are closest together
Sun and Moon are local
And you believe this because?
@@javierlatorre480 my senses don't lie
@@matthewfrank6962 Okay but how do your senses tell you they're local
@@javierlatorre480 I can see through the moon during the day,for 48,000 miles away it sure looks a lot closer.Maybe couple thousand miles instead what they say
@@matthewfrank6962 "I can see through the moon during the day."
Have you considered that the Moon looks blue during the day because the sky is in front of it?
Why do I tap on these clips? It’s like some sort of addiction 😂
Flat baby!
Get a ruler
Now at this height you can see the earth is flat and the sun is small in size this is the truth
There is a curve, SS in the most highest moment. Put a straight line in the image beside the earth line, then reduce the width of the image by a large amount.
You will see the curve very clearly
errr wrong mate
Don't try to explain that to someone who failed geometry, they can't understand that.
it's literally the camera lens's distrortion in the corners. You can see that when it is angled down the curvature is inverted.
@@johannesveike7407 I just double checked and nope, the horizon never actually goes concave in this video. If you insist it does, timestamp it please
@elyjahstark7549 Well you did timestamp it elsewhere...but yeah no, no lens distortion
What was the field of view used to capture this footage?
If your height of 112,906 ft is correct, you have broken the world's record for the highest weather Ballon of 105,000 ft... according to Google, also, our earth is definitely flat.
The actual uncrewed balloon altitude record is 188 000 ft, so no.
Get a ruler. Earth is not flat lol
@@javierlatorre480 tell Google not me, and I think you the one that needs the ruler to try and locate that curve... it's definitely flat.
@@GREEKKINGG I'm telling you because clearly you didn't do even the bare minimum research and just latched onto the first number you found, even though (or probably BECAUSE) it contradicts what you just saw.
And no, I recommended the ruler because I DID find curve with it. A constant curve at the highest elevation regardless of the camera angle.
@@javierlatorre480 might want to check your eyes if you see curvature. You're making yourself see something that's not there based of your bias beliefs of the Heliocentric theory that's been force feed to us growing up. It's gotta curve somewhere if it's a spinning ball and they claim ships go over the horizon at the beach yet even from 20 miles high there's still no curve, it's only prospective, if it was a ball, then the horizon at 1:50 would be "lower" and not even with the viewing prospective. Be honest with yourself , I know its hard to beleive you were deceived but wouldn't you rather know the truth?
Google photos of earth from space and notice they are all cgi composites. The ball earth is a fantasy.
@@GREEKKINGG No, I see curvature because I went out of my way to measure it by literally sticking a ruler on the screen to compare with and not only was the horizon curved with respect to that ruler, but the curve was constant for that entire segment of the video.
Notice that none of the ones taken during Apollo are composites, nor are the ones taken by all prior missions. Notice that Apollo predates the very existence of CGI.
For someone who complains about being force-fed a narrative, you sure ate up a lot of really easily debunkable conspiracy drivel and are trying to regurgitate it verbatim.
Praise Yah
The hotspot though! 👀
Reflection you mean?
Ice crystals in the clouds make beautiful reflections, btw...
Corpuscular even…
Hotspot, ie thing whose existence for some unexplained reason (magical thinking) "disproves" evidence that even flat earthers can tell destroys flat earth.
It's look flat
Look again...
@@suziepeaches321 Sure we do, actually ON, not IN. We all use the same globe Earth map to drive around. FE is a silly prank.
The sun is small and close to the earth, its reflection in the water proves this
nice video...but why did the ballon pop...Do you try to get higher next time?
It’s because it expands the higher it gets. Latex balloons can’t go past 120,000ft. Need Mylar balloons to get higher
1:26 This hotpot under the sun - is it real or you fake it? Unless you did fake it, sun tends to be much smaller and closer than we've been told...
+Bill Hicks You mean the reflection of the sun on the Gulf? That's real.
+Bill Hicks Are you another flat-liner?
The sun is not ..........billions of years away from us, he is just far away from where we are located, there is more land beyond that horizon that we can't see at naked aye
Thats real, only nasa and co is fakeing
Cosa sono quei filamenti che si trovano alla massima altitudine?
It's a flat disc... lovely.
Not even close
@@javierlatorre480 are they seeing the same video, because it loos like that they cant see the curvature no matter way you show to them
@@manl6575 It becomes a question of what goes on in their heads. Are they lying? Is it too subtle for them to see? Are they so motivated by the premise that they feel the need to assert themselves?
@@javierlatorre480 I am not sure about that bro, i think that there is some thing in their unconscius part which is going to deny every curvature that they have show to them no matter how visible it is
@@manl6575 It's not justifiable otherwise. We'd have to check with Flat Earthers who already relented
1:53 Play time is over
Flat earth proof
The opposite, actually
You are a dumbass proof more like.
wish there weren't any cuts in the video
as you flat earthers say where are the stars ?
Exactly. Gives some credibility to all those NASA photos and videos, that also don't have stars in them.
@@my3dviews Because it's day time up there
Hi MCB, at 0:30 up there's an orb. Is the moon or what? tell me please if you can. thank you for now!
Im very happy to see in the comments that a lot of people have figured out that the Globe is a lie.❤
Bait
bad troll 6.5/10
Call me a troll if you like, but that doesn't give this place any curvature. There would be a fixed horizon if I climbed in elevation and that fixed horizon would drop below eye level as that altitude is gained if the ball model was correct. Instead, the horizon rises with the eye. You could put a ruler or yardstick on that flat, eye level horizon and the distance that can fit within it increases with altitude. You don't have to climb very high at all before the spherical trigonometry gets completely destroyed. A line was drawn a long time ago, and you chose poorly. You may "know not what you do", but that unfortunately makes you the enemy today. The enemy is huge. The enemy outnumbers me. But I have a secret. The awareness is like an opened box that can't be closed. I call it the Ark. You won't beat the Ark. Have a nice day.
@@michaelglendinning1738 How can you tell the horizon is "rising with the eye" in this video if the camera is swinging around wildly?
Also, I have, personally, measured the dip in the horizon, and it exists. First I measured from the top of a hill; the dip was tiny but detectable with a bottle of water to use as a reference for level. Sometime later I repeated the observation from a plane and the dip was far more noticeable.
So instead it's pretty clear that you're just wrong. If you genuinely believe this stuff then you're not a troll but you are definitely, factually, incorrect on this.
Also I got a ruler and measured a curve in the horizon on this video as well, so.
@@javierlatorre480 watch Dwayne Kellum's amateur balloon footage. He doesn't use fish eye lenses. Some of his launches go to 220,000 ft. His balloon launches turned him into a Flat Earther. We don't pretend to know what this place is; we only can prove what it is not. I have done a lot of plane travel in my 48 years here. The horizon is always eye level, regardless of which window you choose to look out of. It is checkmate for the ballers, but that indoctrination everyone received as children is hard to throw away. I can lay out provable tests for hours straight and still not convince most. And cognitive dissonance is another animal all together. The ball slowly loses over time. The awareness moves slow; but hell should be slow.
Is it common for the balloon to pop at approximately 110,000 feet? I just watched the same thing happen in a different video. Is that what happened and if so, what causes it?
As the balloon rises in the atmosphere, the atmosphere gradually becomes thinner, i.e. the air pressure drops.
At ground level, the external pressure of the atmosphere equalises with the internal pressure of the balloon. But as the atmospheric pressure drops as the balloon rises, it provides less resistance against the internal pressure of the balloon, so the balloon gradually swells up more.
Eventually the balloon just swells to the point that it pops. At 110 000 ft the atmospheric pressure is roughly 1% the pressure at sea level.
Gökkube..
The atmosphere that we take for granted, in reality it’s all dark whether the sun is shining or not. 🥴
It's the various gases in the atmosphere and sunlight's various wavelengths that gives us the typical blue colour.
When you're up in the higher reaches of the atmosphere, the concentration of these gases becomes less and less with altitude, to the point where no blue is being created, eventually coming to the point where no colour is being produced at all, hence the darkness.
@@sailorman8668 Sunlight reaches Earth's atmosphere and is scattered in all directions by all the gases and particles in the air. Blue light is scattered in all directions by the tiny molecules of air in Earth's atmosphere. Blue is scattered more than other colors because it travels as shorter, smaller waves. This is why we see a blue sky most of the time.😁
@@Saa42808 Yep, in other words, the sky would be dark, if it wasn't for the atmosphere, hence why it's always dark in the vacuum of space.
Well, you do see the blue below the camera once the Sun is up
pause @ 1:49 min :P
What? I didn’t see anything
I love the fact people still think they live on a spinning ball . Goooons
You say on a video with proof of curvature... Visible measurable convex horizon below the center of the lens once the altitude is high enough.Which btw is the case for not just this video, but every single high altitude balloon video.
@@CAMlCAZl still preaching your cartoon ball I see.
“Every single high altitude balloon video” you say? Ready for me to prove that wrong?
@@Sealedservant sure thing, show me a high altitude balloom video where it never turns convex from launch to landing while below the center. I'll wait.
@@Sealedservant "Ready for me to prove that wrong?"
Well, what the fuck are you waiting for?
@@CAMlCAZl you’re on it
Well done bro one love
The reflection of the sun in the middle of the clouds tells me that the sun is not 150 million km away 😂😂😂
Why? On a globe with a faraway sun only a small area would focus parallel rays towards the camera. Test it out with a small scale ball
@@javierlatorre480 bro , your explanation doesn't make sense
@@knowledge1873 Then I guess go out and test it with a reflective ball, or something curved and reflective
@@javierlatorre480 I see no curvature to begin with 😂
@@knowledge1873 Get a ruler then
Why cut out the relevant part of the sunrise
It's always flat…
You can see just a bit of curve
@@javierlatorre480Have you ever looked the ground surface from a aeroplane window!
@@aculmamun Yes. Dozens of times actually. Not that it means much, because this balloon has to go a lot higher to see a curve.
@@javierlatorre480 No matter how high you go you won't see any curve if you don't use a fish eye lense camera.
@@aculmamun This camera saw a slight bit of curve and it wasn't fish eye. If you ever take a flight yourself, snap a picture of the horizon, then squish it horizontally to exaggerate the curve.
Wish it were clear enough to see some land markers.
The sun is so close to us. Why science feeding humans a wrong information regarding that matter. Hope to see the moon next 😇✌️
How canyou tell it's close with this footage? How would a faraway Sun look in your opinion?
Oh really then why don't you go there
The real question is WHY..? We need to find that out..! Why d heavens did science lie..? There must be something hidden
I'm Daniele and I would like to know what and what the software is called, thanks
Which software?
@elyjahstark7549What the hell are you talking about?
Totaly flath,no curve
So high up in the air but I still see stars beneath those are not city lights I'm quite sure if you're thousands of feet up in the air that bright
Too bad, because those are clearly city lights. Note that they're all below the horizon
Man thsts flat!!
it's amazing the truth and facts that you see without using CGI cartoons and Hollywood basement stunts and project Blue beam ai.........
Indeed. A pretty good look at the Earth's curvature without a pesky fisheye lens
earth is flat..
But evidence points the other way...
Your mind is flat.
Get a ruler
Yawn.
God isn't real and the Earth is a Globe.
Get used to it finally!
AWESOME...thank you!!
The sun looked really close when the balloon got over 100k feet high
Based on what?
@@CAMlCAZl based on my own personal perception of course
@@stevenbrown5210 in other words, based on nothing measurable or verifiable.
@@CAMlCAZl yes, hence the term "looked close" meaning "in my opinion". It's ok, you have the public school system to explain your lack of understanding
@@stevenbrown5210 oh I understand, was just trying to figure out if you actually thought it was close or not like some people think it is. Which it obviously isn't.
was that sunrise or sunset? looks beautiful .
Sunrise
It depends on where you're at..
Earth is flat. This video proves it.
The opposite, actually. Even the original poster saw a curve
the oposite , ejejeej
@@javierlatorre480 nasa haa curves on 30k feet. This one hardly has any on 100k feet who is lying? You sheep. EARTH IS FLAT
@@TAFTurkishAirForce Show the footage of curve at 30k feet or else you may be taken as the liar. Besides, curve is the absolute least of the host of problems the Flat Earth has
Earth is flat
Great vid.
Earth is flat baby.
Earth is round baby.
@@zakwanberlin I'm so sorry for your eyes baby.
@@tuncay8727 I’m sorry for yours if you can’t see that curve
@@zakwanberlin I can't see because there is no curve.
@@tuncay8727 You just don’t want to see the curve.
60.000ft over the sun, 100.000 sun is over ?
So, at 112,906 ft, the balloon suddenly popped, sending some white stuff flying, and started falling back down.
Did it hit that famous Glass Ceiling Hilary Clinton is always talking about....
Nope! It popped because the atmospheric pressure at that height was extremely low and couldn't counteract the internal pressure of the balloon.
Also, Hillary's glass ceiling is a well known figure of speech, you dummy, and it's about disadvantaged groups like women, not a literal glass ceiling over the Earth. Which of the two does it make more sense for Hillary to be talking about?
Also don't you think 113 thousand feet is a little too _low?_
Another idea for photographing the ice wall is to go to South Africa and hold a camera up to the sky again and we will see the wall clearly but on a clear day without clouds.
Sun is 3,100 - 3,300 miles above the Earth with triangulation and observation!
Uhh no try 94 million miles away
Liar, if you actually triangulate the sun, you would see for yourself it's 93 million miles away.
If you triangulated the Sun using several observers across multiple latitudes, you would get different results from everyone if they all used your method. Not a good sign for your point
Ha, the idiot thinks he knows how to triangulate
Ceecritz Come back when you've grown a brain.
What type of camera???
I dream of a day in the near future, that all of humanity unites against the globe earth lies, and realizes how special earth truly is.
Stop using a globe Earth map to drive around hypocrite.
You don't dream any such thing kid. Stop lying.
You do realize this video has proof of curvature right?
@@CAMlCAZl Um no! lol You are totally incorrect. The curve of the horizon in this video is caused by the lens. Proper cameras with proper lenses, have been launched all over the earth. The earth does not have curvature. The lack of curvature is proven beyond all doubt.
@@HoudiniGTP Brilliant reply. Thanks.
Nice n FLAT ....thx
Get a ruler
@elyjahstark7549 We've gone over this already lmao. Weren't you claiming fish eye at some point just to be a contrarian?
Edit: Well if he literally can never address what I say, safe to say he's not worth anyone's attention.
Lindo👏👏
The sun is smaller than the earth and hovers above the landscape. The earth isn't spinning.
So, the universe spins??? How far away is it and how fast does it spin?
@@tjjones621 What is the universe? The sun and moon are the bodies that move. They both follow exactly the same paths and are the same in size.
@@ekulenwaiku4654 Prove it. Then tell me if you think Earth is flat... and I'll make you prove yourself wrong.
@@tjjones621 Nobody knows the shape of the earth...all educated guesses. The danger with educated guesses is that you'd try to squeeze every phenomena into it even when it's falling apart right before your very eyes.
First prove that the earth rotates. Then prove the sun is 93 million miles away. Then prove how a zoom camera can see details of stars beyond 4.2 lightyears away. Then prove why westbound flights don't experience shorter times relative to eastbound flights with a factor of 1,038 miles/hour. And please don't hide behind the excuse of a vehicle and its atmosphere as common sense tells us that the system cannot be the same as if it were not spinning in one direction. Gracias!
@@ekulenwaiku4654 Neither of us can prove anything about the stars. We have no first hand knowledge. We both rely on what others tell us. I am willing to admit it, can you?
But, you and I both know the shape of Earth. We both use the exact same map of it. There is no guessing. We can both find any place on Earth and get turn by turn directions to any city on any continent.
No mater what the shape, can you admit you have a map of Earth?
Truth is stranger than fiction
Flate earth
Why did it cut out from 25 to 60,000 ft?
Are you telling me you would have wanted to watch the whole half hour climb from 25 to 60 000 ft? There's a clock in the bottom right corner.
@@javierlatorre480why do you care so much? You're really going hard on the comments
Only one can create this beautiful 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏ALLAH 🙌
You mean GOD jesus Christ Allah is the devil don't get them confused
@@MadSonStudios
Respect every religion. Gospel says love everyone.
like on entity created this... lol
@@adaminkoluabartmiyorum30cm jesus is much more than a prophet.he is the word in human form in other words he is GOD himself.and every knee will bow down to him every religion is not the same.allah is the devil not GOD..its about relationship not religion
Allah is a demon moon god. Jesus Christ is the Alpha and Omega
Its amazing .i love it
it hit the dome
Um... no. The balloon popped.
What??? Flat????
Nope
Flat and when it hit the firmament it popped like it was supposed to no man has ever left earth.
I don't think that was firmament. But I do agree its flat
@@MassHysteriaHD the firmament is all in the bible there is one there
You truly are mad son.
Did the Bible ever mention the Firmament's height or whether or not the Sun was inside it? Why does the Bible even matter in this discussion when there is a visible curve in the video?
112.905ft = 34.41344km
Flat !!! Ty bro , sharing ever
Nope
Why do the balloons reach a limit?maybe there is a clear dome like the bible mentions
No, it's because the atmospheric pressure becomes too low to counteract the internal pressure of the balloon, causing it to swell until it bursts
Earth is flat and there is a dome like the bible says
@@elgallitodelpalenque3152 Good luck proving either of these things because I see a curve in this video and no dome; again, the balloon popped because of a lack of external air pressure
The reflection of the sun shows how close it really is to us. Not millions of miles away!
It does not. There will always be a reflection no matter how far an object is.
@@msidc1238I'm talking about where the reflection is. It's directly below below it.
@@eddyjejm Where exactly do you expect the reflection to be?
@@msidc1238 as big as the sun supposedly is and how far it supposedly is, the sun should be shining a bright light on the entire earth (assuming the earths flat). Now if the earth has curvature, then the sun should be shining a bright light on a much greater distance then just that one little spot. Open your mind and try relearn everything you been taught by doing your own experiments. Stop taking NASA’s and governments word for everything, haven’t they lied to us enough? Seek the truth,
@@theman563 It is shining on the half of the planet. If you have ever looked at a reflective floor you would see that even though the entire room is lit, the reflection of the light is only a small little spot on the ground. It is simple logic.
If the earth is flat, where is the edge? Can a person fall off the edge?
No, the firmament dome mentioned in religious books will stop you
@@Sealedservant what city is near this dome. I want to see it
@@philbenson6041 there is no city near the dome, just the ice wall surrounding everything on earth (theoretically)
FE is just a silly prank. The only reason it's even a thing at all is because there are so many gullible people out there... That's the real scary part.
@@philbenson6041 I think it's called, Gullibleopolis.
The real flat earth 👍
No
@@javierlatorre480 wher is curve
@@manib6594 When the balloon is at its absolute highest before it pops
Did it just hit firmament
No, the balloon just popped from the pressure differential.
You'd think the "firmament" would be _visible_ if the balloon made contact with it.
Fact. Horizon always rises to eye level
No, it doesn't
Fact: flat earth minions are all liars
@@tatonemio6388 from video evidence horizon always rises to eye level to at least 120,000 feet. .
Using private actual video with no fish eye lense.
@@JudaismIslamUnited
Hearsay, present your evidence here and now in the form of measurements , data points , equations.
All laws of physics are presented in mathematical/geometric language to ensure consistency.
Provide unambiguous definition of horizon and "eye level" and formulate your claim properly.
BTW a video from 36km altitude on a 40,000km planet is pretty useless. Try 1,000km or 10,000km.
And there are all sort of video/photographic evidence Earth is not flat so you can't use a special pleading for your video evidence, can you?
Fact: theodolites, which measure perfect level, disagree with you.
Also I'm pretty sure you can't claim the horizon rises to eye level on videos like this one where the camera is moving all over the place, or on fisheye videos with the horizon below centre frame
@@tatonemio6388 are you talking about the height in this video? Cause the altitude is almost 113,000ft.
Horizon is perfectly flat and motionless. No noticeable spin nor orbit. Just a flat motionless earth to live on. If you wanna call everything in the firmament space im ok with that.
If you've seen the horizon, you have personally witnessed the curve of Earth. There is no horizon on a flat endless plane. The FE meanies lied to you.
Firmament is correctly translated expanse. Sure sounds like space to me. A really really big expanse. Don't let them damage your understanding of Scripture too.
I mean…it would be impossible to see it spinning from a camera in the atmosphere. The Earth spins in a span of 24 hours, that’s really slow for us… and we wouldn’t be able to “see” an orbit either, as it takes 1 year for the Earth to orbit the sun.
We spin with the Earth, and even though the camera is being carried by the balloon, it’s all being moved by the Earth too. You can’t see something spin if your on it. It would appear to be still.
Think about it like a spinning teacup ride in an amusement park. If your riding in the spinning cup, the cup will look still to you, as you’re sitting inside it. But everything around you (outside the cup) will look blurry and distorted because your sinning.
With the Earth spinning so slow, we have to record (on camera) the night sky, and then we would need to speed up the video; we would then see the sky moving. But it’s just like the tea cups, the Earth is spinning with us on it. So the Earth itself will never “move” in our perspective.
Funny, there is no horizon on a flat endless plane. Do you really think you are seeing the edge on the other side of Antarctica in that vid??? If so, how come planes don't just fly over there and take a look?
Flat Earth
is a hoax. Finish it!
Gullible suckers.... :)
Earth is bigger than you think it is and no air (why it got down) the sun is 1m times of the earth inside
You have been duped to INSTANTANEOUSLY believe, memorize and regurgitate everything that scientism tells you!! Acclaimed PHYSICIST NDTYSON ADMITS that you cannot see the curvature of the earth at 60+ miles in altitude!!
ua-cam.com/users/shortsvjnLJtBtVeE?feature=share
The sun rotates around the earth from east to west at a height that varies from 130 to 160 kilometers depending on the season, at a speed of approximately 1500 kilometers per hour. The sun moves following the tropics: when the sun is on the Tropic of Cancer, it is summer in our part of the world and winter in Australia, and when it is on the Tropic of Capricorn, it is winter here and summer in Australia. When the sun is on the equator, we experience spring or autumn.
We don't always see the sun in our part of the world because its light gradually fades in our atmosphere, which has an average propagation speed of light of about 3·10'8 meters per second. This speed is higher than the average propagation speed of light in water, which is about 1.26·10'10 meters per second. In an ocean, light begins to lose its frequency/strength at a depth of 150 meters, due to the greater density of water (997 kg/m³), which creates darkness at a depth of 200 meters. In our atmosphere, the propagation of light is greater and can travel up to about 6,000 kilometers (depending on the season). In summer, however, the heat causes water to evaporate, which reduces visibility due to what is called the atmospheric visual block.
The blue color of the sky during the day is due to the sun's radiation on our atmosphere at a concentration of 0 to 20 kilometers, gradually reaching an altitude of about 40 kilometers before fading among other lighter elements such as helium. Above the sun, there is only darkness, with the exception of stars, due to the absence of an atmosphere. The red color of the sunset is due to the frequency of light, which decreases as it passes through the atmosphere. The closer you are to the sun, the higher the frequency of light (1005-1035 THz 380-790 nm), while the outer edges of the solar halo have a much lower frequency (400-484 THz 625-740 nm), creating the red color.
The sun does not actually set, but rather appears to do so due to the perspective created by our atmosphere, which acts like a magnifying lens. The illusion of the sunset can be observed by looking at the sun in the sky during winter, as it appears to shrink while moving away. This lens effect is also observed with the moon, which appears larger at the horizon during summer and smaller at the zenith, with a difference of up to 20%. The law that holds everything up is based on density and specific weight. For example, an apple falls to the ground because it is denser and heavier than air, but it floats in water due to its density and specific weight. Gravity, as it is commonly described, does not actually exist. Our weight is due to the density of our bodies, which is positioned between the earth and the air (human body density: 1040 kg/m3, air density: 1.225 kg/m3, ground density: 1800 kg/m3). Additionally, the weight of the atmospheric column above us (about 1000-1500 kg depending on the season) pushes us downward. When we go up a mountain, our weight decreases by a few grams because we are in a lower atmospheric column. The sun needs to be low to function.
density isn't a force
@@delayedcreator4783 density is a force, Archimedes' law proves it, this works in both negative and positive (up and down)! Moving matter creates energy!
@@emilianoantonini9375 density = mass / volume. Where is the force in that🤣🤣🤣.You will get nobel price if you prove that🤣
@@emilianoantonini9375 Archimedes' principle only works on the principle that the medium being displayed is denser, therefore heavier, than the object displacing it, to generate positive buoyancy. In other words, it depends on the materials' weight. Meaning it depends on gravity.
Also Archimedes quite famously stated: “The surface of any fluid at rest is the surface of a sphere whose centre is the same as that of the Earth.”
@@javierlatorre480 No sorry! look... objects fall or rise vertically not due to a 'force of gravity', but due to the difference in density between the object itself and the surrounding medium.
An object more dense than medium will tend to fall downwards, while one less dense will tend to rise upwards. For example, a stone falls through the air because it is denser than air.
These motions also depend on the absolute density of the medium: with the same density difference between the object and the medium, the motion will be slower in a denser medium, due to the greater resistance encountered (e.g. a balloon in water rises more slowly than in 'air).
Furthermore, Archimedes' law states that an immersed body receives an upward thrust equal to the weight of the displaced fluid. This helps explain buoyancy and suspension.
In summary, in this alternative model, falls and vertical motions are explained by relative density, media drag and buoyancy, without invoking the existence of a 'gravitational force'."