![MCBVictoriaTX](/img/default-banner.jpg)
- 67
- 92 561
MCBVictoriaTX
Приєднався 20 сер 2010
Welcome to the video channel of the Museum of the Coastal Bend. We're home to 13,000 years of Texas heritage. Our mission is to enhance the appreciation and enjoyment of the region's heritage, and we hope that these videos help bring that history to life.
2200 East Red River, Victoria, TX 77901
Open Tuesday-Saturday, 10am-4pm
2200 East Red River, Victoria, TX 77901
Open Tuesday-Saturday, 10am-4pm
MCB Borchers Leon Exhibit Hall Timelapse
Watch the construction of the Borchers Leon Exhibit Hall at Victoria College's Museum of the Coastal Bend! The first component of the new permanent exhibit, Where Texas Ranching Began, will open in October 2024.
Переглядів: 29
Відео
Interview 1 with Rickey Ramseur
Переглядів 373 роки тому
Oral History Interview 1 with Rickey Ramseur as part of the Coastal Bend Archaeological Logistics Team (CoBALT) Oral History Project, conducted by museum intern and M.A. Public History Student Glory Turnbull. CoBALT is a group of citizen archaeologists that protect and excavate archaeological sites in the Coastal Bend of Texas. This project aims to preserve the knowledge of CoBALT’s members and...
Interview 3 with Bill Birmingham
Переглядів 313 роки тому
Oral History Interview 3 with Bill Birmingham as part of the Coastal Bend Archaeological Logistics Team (CoBALT) Oral History Project, conducted by museum intern and M.A. Public History Student Glory Turnbull. CoBALT is a group of citizen archaeologists that protect and excavate archaeological sites in the Coastal Bend of Texas. This project aims to preserve the knowledge of CoBALT’s members an...
Interview 2 with Bill Birmingham
Переглядів 193 роки тому
Oral History Interview 2 with Bill Birmingham as part of the Coastal Bend Archaeological Logistics Team (CoBALT) Oral History Project, conducted by museum intern and M.A. Public History Student Glory Turnbull. CoBALT is a group of citizen archaeologists that protect and excavate archaeological sites in the Coastal Bend of Texas. This project aims to preserve the knowledge of CoBALT’s members an...
Interview 2 with Jud Austin
Переглядів 253 роки тому
Oral History Interview 2 with Jud Austin as part of the Coastal Bend Archaeological Logistics Team (CoBALT) Oral History Project, conducted by museum intern and M.A. Public History Student Glory Turnbull. CoBALT is a group of citizen archaeologists that protect and excavate archaeological sites in the Coastal Bend of Texas. This project aims to preserve the knowledge of CoBALT’s members and edu...
Interview 1 with Jud Austin
Переглядів 263 роки тому
Oral History Interview 1 with Jud Austin as part of the Coastal Bend Archaeological Logistics Team (CoBALT) Oral History Project, conducted by museum intern and M.A. Public History Student Glory Turnbull. CoBALT is a group of citizen archaeologists that protect and excavate archaeological sites in the Coastal Bend of Texas. This project aims to preserve the knowledge of CoBALT’s members and edu...
Interview 1 with Frank Condron
Переглядів 723 роки тому
Oral History Interview 1 with Frank Condron as part of the Coastal Bend Archaeological Logistics Team (CoBALT) Oral History Project, conducted by museum intern and M.A. Public History Student Glory Turnbull. CoBALT is a group of citizen archaeologists that protect and excavate archaeological sites in the Coastal Bend of Texas. This project aims to preserve the knowledge of CoBALT’s members and ...
Interview 2 with Ben McReynolds
Переглядів 763 роки тому
Oral History Interview 2 with Ben McReynolds as part of the Coastal Bend Archaeological Logistics Team (CoBALT) Oral History Project, conducted by museum intern and M.A. Public History Student Glory Turnbull. CoBALT is a group of citizen archaeologists that protect and excavate archaeological sites in the Coastal Bend of Texas. This project aims to preserve the knowledge of CoBALT’s members and...
Interview 1 with Bill Birmingham
Переглядів 323 роки тому
Oral History Interview 1 with Bill Birmingham as part of the Coastal Bend Archaeological Logistics Team (CoBALT) Oral History Project, conducted by museum intern and M.A. Public History Student Glory Turnbull. CoBALT is a group of citizen archaeologists that protect and excavate archaeological sites in the Coastal Bend of Texas. This project aims to preserve the knowledge of CoBALT’s members an...
Interview 1 with Ben McReynolds
Переглядів 473 роки тому
Oral History Interview 1 with Ben McReynolds as part of the Coastal Bend Archaeological Logistics Team (CoBALT) Oral History Project, conducted by museum intern and M.A. Public History Student Glory Turnbull. CoBALT is a group of citizen archaeologists that protect and excavate archaeological sites in the Coastal Bend of Texas. This project aims to preserve the knowledge of CoBALT’s members and...
Bill Birmingham on Responsible Collecting
Переглядів 233 роки тому
Bill Birmingham explains how to collect responsibly, and how private collections can become intellectual assets. Interview conducted by Glory Turnbull. To learn more about the Museum of the Coastal Bend, visit our website at www.museumofthecoastalbend.org/home
Bill Birmingham on Documentation of Private Collections
Переглядів 803 роки тому
Bill Birmingham discusses how documentation has led to important discoveries in the field of archaeology. Birmingham relates how careful documentation reunited two halves of an artifact, years after each piece was found. Interview conducted by Glory Turnbull. To learn more about the Museum of the Coastal Bend, visit our website at www.museumofthecoastalbend.org/home
MCB Virtual Exhibit Introduction
Переглядів 1073 роки тому
Greg Garrett, Museum Experience Educator, introduces the Museum of the Coastal Bend and the virtual exhibit. Visit MCB in-person or online at www.museumofthecoastalbend.org.
Lunch & Learn Archaeology Appreciation with Frank Condron Part 2
Переглядів 293 роки тому
The Second part of Frank Condron's Archaeology Appreciation program 3/11/2021
Lunch & Learn Archaeology Appreciation with Frank Condron 20210210 1759 1 1
Переглядів 363 роки тому
Lunch & Learn Archaeology Appreciation with Frank Condron 20210210 1759 1 1
Lunch and Learn Excavation of La Belle and Fort St Louis
Переглядів 2243 роки тому
Lunch and Learn Excavation of La Belle and Fort St Louis
Flat
Globe
@@alexf962 there is no curve, so...
@@traquemorrel1820 There Is and a single sunset proves the whole flatearth wrong, so...
@@traquemorrel1820 Get a ruler
Why do I tap on these clips? It’s like some sort of addiction 😂
1:33 distance of 93205678 miles...
Yep
Flat baby!
Get a ruler
The earth is flat. No curve
Get a ruler
Great video, thanks for showing us all how God really created this world, it's definitely flat this video proves it and so does the Bible, all glory to Yahuah 🙏🏽
Bait
A glober here said "it's curved at 1:42. I asked so it flat for 2 minutes then curved for 1:42 then flat for another minute? Or? Lol let's play" ball" folks
Nope. From 1:16 all the way to 2:08 the curve is visible. It's more noticeable in the areas that aren't full of hazy clouds but it's there the whole way through, even as the balloon begins to freefall. Get ruler, that should help.
@@javierlatorre480 no it's not curved. You watch baseball? It looks just like the field, center field is further back then the corners. Earth is a ROUND DISK . It will always have a round shape going close to long distance not curved as in the middle( center field) being higher than the sides- no. Baseball fields are flat- same exact thing is the earth. Look again
@@javierlatorre480 even still lmao so the other minute it's flat? C'mon bro you should know just by that that it's angles and perspective that's all. But whatever makes you happy go convince yourself not my problem lol
@@miguelrosado7014 The other minutes the camera is not high up enough to capture the curvature. You're really grasping here. You can't just say "angles and perspective" as though the words BY THEMSELVES can constitute the whole argument. Baseball fields are not round, and if you're implying that the curve is there due to it being circular, it implies that you should be seeing all the way to the ice wall. Which you don't. That body of water is just the Gulf of Mexico.
@@javierlatorre480 you don't watch baseball I get it. Your mind can't compare anything, that's your problem not mine once again. You're convinced but not convincing lol. Try again. It's angles look that up and perspective look that up dude it's not just words they actually mean stuff
Cool! Cool! Cool! Level horizon! The Earth is Flat! Good job brother!🤗👍
Get a ruler
Roundness is not the same as sphericity. What you see here is the roundness of our flat Earth. Wake up!!!!
@@jesus4400 Cope
Its dark when launch so How come we see the sun in full then if its supposed to be on the other side of the globe? FE wins again
Did you see the clock on the bottom right hand corner that says "5:51 am" at the very start of the video? That's why. If anything that's a flat Earth _loss_ as the Sun would be visible from the ground at that hour were Earth to be flat.
Im very happy to see in the comments that a lot of people have figured out that the Globe is a lie.❤
Bait
bad troll 6.5/10
Call me a troll if you like, but that doesn't give this place any curvature. There would be a fixed horizon if I climbed in elevation and that fixed horizon would drop below eye level as that altitude is gained if the ball model was correct. Instead, the horizon rises with the eye. You could put a ruler or yardstick on that flat, eye level horizon and the distance that can fit within it increases with altitude. You don't have to climb very high at all before the spherical trigonometry gets completely destroyed. A line was drawn a long time ago, and you chose poorly. You may "know not what you do", but that unfortunately makes you the enemy today. The enemy is huge. The enemy outnumbers me. But I have a secret. The awareness is like an opened box that can't be closed. I call it the Ark. You won't beat the Ark. Have a nice day.
@@michaelglendinning1738 How can you tell the horizon is "rising with the eye" in this video if the camera is swinging around wildly? Also, I have, personally, measured the dip in the horizon, and it exists. First I measured from the top of a hill; the dip was tiny but detectable with a bottle of water to use as a reference for level. Sometime later I repeated the observation from a plane and the dip was far more noticeable. So instead it's pretty clear that you're just wrong. If you genuinely believe this stuff then you're not a troll but you are definitely, factually, incorrect on this. Also I got a ruler and measured a curve in the horizon on this video as well, so.
@@javierlatorre480 watch Dwayne Kellum's amateur balloon footage. He doesn't use fish eye lenses. Some of his launches go to 220,000 ft. His balloon launches turned him into a Flat Earther. We don't pretend to know what this place is; we only can prove what it is not. I have done a lot of plane travel in my 48 years here. The horizon is always eye level, regardless of which window you choose to look out of. It is checkmate for the ballers, but that indoctrination everyone received as children is hard to throw away. I can lay out provable tests for hours straight and still not convince most. And cognitive dissonance is another animal all together. The ball slowly loses over time. The awareness moves slow; but hell should be slow.
People that truly think they see curvature need a eye apppintment! At 1:51 its a straight line all the way across. The Heliocentric theory is falling apart, its a fantasy and every single thing nasa gives us is cgi cartoons. We need to do real science like this and not trust mainstream science, nasa steal 20 billion dollars each year to feed us all cartoons! If it was a giant spinning ball, its gotta curve somewhere. If you think you see a curve notice the horizon is still eye level, if it was a ball it would be lower then the viewing prospective... theres no curve even at 20 miles high... so where is your fatasy curve at?
It's a little more obvious around 1:34 where there are less clouds. Also it is indeed below the "viewing perspective". Only issue is the camera _isn't sitting still._
If your height of 112,906 ft is correct, you have broken the world's record for the highest weather Ballon of 105,000 ft... according to Google, also, our earth is definitely flat.
The actual uncrewed balloon altitude record is 188 000 ft, so no. Get a ruler. Earth is not flat lol
@@javierlatorre480 tell Google not me, and I think you the one that needs the ruler to try and locate that curve... it's definitely flat.
@@GREEKKINGG I'm telling you because clearly you didn't do even the bare minimum research and just latched onto the first number you found, even though (or probably BECAUSE) it contradicts what you just saw. And no, I recommended the ruler because I DID find curve with it. A constant curve at the highest elevation regardless of the camera angle.
@@javierlatorre480 might want to check your eyes if you see curvature. You're making yourself see something that's not there based of your bias beliefs of the Heliocentric theory that's been force feed to us growing up. It's gotta curve somewhere if it's a spinning ball and they claim ships go over the horizon at the beach yet even from 20 miles high there's still no curve, it's only prospective, if it was a ball, then the horizon at 1:50 would be "lower" and not even with the viewing prospective. Be honest with yourself , I know its hard to beleive you were deceived but wouldn't you rather know the truth? Google photos of earth from space and notice they are all cgi composites. The ball earth is a fantasy.
@@GREEKKINGG No, I see curvature because I went out of my way to measure it by literally sticking a ruler on the screen to compare with and not only was the horizon curved with respect to that ruler, but the curve was constant for that entire segment of the video. Notice that none of the ones taken during Apollo are composites, nor are the ones taken by all prior missions. Notice that Apollo predates the very existence of CGI. For someone who complains about being force-fed a narrative, you sure ate up a lot of really easily debunkable conspiracy drivel and are trying to regurgitate it verbatim.
Is it common for the balloon to pop at approximately 110,000 feet? I just watched the same thing happen in a different video. Is that what happened and if so, what causes it?
As the balloon rises in the atmosphere, the atmosphere gradually becomes thinner, i.e. the air pressure drops. At ground level, the external pressure of the atmosphere equalises with the internal pressure of the balloon. But as the atmospheric pressure drops as the balloon rises, it provides less resistance against the internal pressure of the balloon, so the balloon gradually swells up more. Eventually the balloon just swells to the point that it pops. At 110 000 ft the atmospheric pressure is roughly 1% the pressure at sea level.
Gökkube..
it's amazing the truth and facts that you see without using CGI cartoons and Hollywood basement stunts and project Blue beam ai.........
Indeed. A pretty good look at the Earth's curvature without a pesky fisheye lens
the earth is biblicaly flat as it says in Gods word the bible ive proven this and so much more on my channel your video proves that even more much love and God bless
Get a ruler
Bible never says that earth is flat. Don't bother put here any, none of them says earth is flat
Why cut out the relevant part of the sunrise
Did it just hit firmament
No, the balloon just popped from the pressure differential. You'd think the "firmament" would be _visible_ if the balloon made contact with it.
In response to some of the comments below: We see the Sun to be obscured behind the horizon here, then 'rise' across the horizon - something that's we shouldn't see unless the surface has at least enough of a hump or curve to it for the Sun's disk to be obscured behind. But we do see it. There's a distinct left-right curve to the horizon both when the horizon is in the midline of the shot and when it's some distance below it. There are features appearing from behind the horizon as the viewpoint rises - not becoming wider, but actually revealing themselves from behind it - what you see from a viewpoint rising over a curve. There's always room to claim that illusions could be at play. But just slam-dunk saying 'it's appearing as if flat'... I'm content that's an example of 'doubling down' not a response to the evidence in the video.
wish there weren't any cuts in the video
Nice n FLAT ....thx
Fentany fill balloons you have a different attitude. Just because we have a 🤡 clown FJB running the show Brought back by popular demand. So happy Friday night I'm back on balloon watch. And it just popped into Utah. What direction was it coming from
cavolata! la camera è stata collocata male
Dovevano metterla dentro il pallone, eh?
@@primonomeultimonome No, metterla in modo che inquadrasse correttamente, ti sembra impossibile?
@@giacomogiglio8963 Ha ripreso esattamente quello che doveva riprendere.
@@primonomeultimonome assolutamente no, l'orizzonte si intravede ma non si vede mai chiaramente
@@giacomogiglio8963 Ma se non si vede null'altro che l'orizzonte per tutta l'ascesa del pallone!
I spy with my little eye ...something curved.
For the flat earth paste eaters here - this and every other high altitude camera proves the 🌎 The horizon is ALWAYS equidistant from the camera as it rotates 360 degrees, no matter where on earth it is launched. A sphere is the only shape that allows for this condition. The type of lens is irrelevant. Doesn’t matter. It’s not debatable. You live on a spinning space ball. Get help for your unhealthy persecution complex.
Bro…what… Hold up I need some clarification. So you mean to tell me…you think the horizon…CANNOT be equidistant…on a flat plane…🤔 Wait wait so can you explain to me what it is about a flat plane that would prevent the horizon from being equidistant to a camera 100,000ft in the air…help me please I’m lost lol
@@xFaytal What shape is this “flat plane”? Circle? Square? Rectangle? Oval? Something else?
@@EmersumBigginsBible mentions “circle of the Earth” so I’d assume circle like a pancake. Answer my question now I need help please.
@@xFaytal If that’s the case, then the only location that the horizon could be equidistant from a camera would be the exact center. You need to have that explained to you?🤔
@@EmersumBigginswait wait…so you mean to tell me you think we’re supposed to see the edge of the earth at 100,000 feet? That’s the only way the camera in this video wouldn’t have equidistant view of the horizon right? I’m confused what point you’re trying to make lol.
La terre est plate 🛹 youupiii 😂
Strangely mesmerising....when the balloon burst, for a moment it felt like I was the one falling!! Thank you for posting 🙏
I'm Daniele and I would like to know what and what the software is called, thanks
Which software?
O sol redeia a terra e lua também a terra está parada
yep flat earth
Get a ruler
@elyjahstark7549 This reply was pointless lol
The only thing flat is the readout of your brain activity 🙄
@elyjahstark7549Got a full playlist with low distortion lenses showing the curve. Goodbye imaginary pancake.
@elyjahstark7549 "Nuh-uh" is no evidence, buddy. The Earth is measurably curved. Cope.
Flat earthers are such idiots
Flat
The Earth does not look curved and the Sun does not look to be 93 million miles away I think space is not even close to what we have been taught.
The Earth very much looks curved. I suggest you get a ruler. Question, how do you think the Sun being 93 million miles away should look like?
Well i guess it is a world view I see no curve@@javierlatorre480
@@2267victor I still recommend you get a ruler for this video. There's curve 1:16
@elyjahstark7549 Nope, got the ruler. Still not flat. It's also not eye level. Get something to compare the horizon with and you will see when you look at it in person.
@elyjahstark7549 Usually it's because someone like you keeps messaging me
Fact: It Reach A Maximum of 112,906ft (34.4137488km or 21.3837121mi)
flat
Get a ruler
@@javierlatorre480 little fish eye
@@MrItaliano1900 And yet the horizon remained convex in the parts where it was below centre frame.
@elyjahstark7549 Well, I've done the ruler trick again on your timestamp and it still isn't flat. There's a noticeable bulge above the ruler.
@elyjahstark7549 Local man can only sit and deny the observation of curvature using a flat line for reference. Edit: His reply is further denial. I need not say more lol
Flat earth ❤
Maybe I’m going blind with my 20/10 vision, but sure looks pretty flat and level to me
what? 1:30
Get a ruler, it'll help
lens distrotion@@turtle6401
@@johannesveike7407 nope
@@johannesveike7407barrel distortion (what flat earthers want to call "fish eye") always causes straight lines not crossing the center of frame to curve away from the center, yet the horizon can clearly be seen curving toward the center when below the center of fame at 1:16, which means the horizon clesrly is curved.
If the earth was curved then the horizon wouldn't rise to eye level. The higher the vantage point the lower the horizon would be. Even with a fish eye lens you see the horizon at eye level no matter how high the balloon or rocket gets. Just play with the numbers of the curvature formula and you will begin to see the propesterous lie we have all been programmed to see and believe and become very defensive about. The irony is that globe earthers don't even know their own beliefs and that they came from Catholic priests. They just believe in it, without ever questioning it, testing it, or examining the evidence, yet they think they are the scientific minded ones.
@@a_forest_walker "so you sit in a room playing with a calculator to prove what is real even though you can see for yourself video after video, no matter the altitude of the rocket or balloon, that the horizon is always at eye level. Do you know what Tesla had to say about guys like you?" I was more talking about putting together the diagram and seeing how observer height affected horizon dip. Also, I have a direct view of the ocean where I live, and I could confirm the dip was about as slight as I had calculated, using the water in a bottle for reference. The surface is level enough that aligning it with my eyes was easy, and the horizon was below that. Additionally, can you REALLY say that the horizon is at "eye level" in these videos? The camera sure as hell isn't perfectly level in any of these, either swinging around like in this video, or pointed quite noticeably upwards or downwards. "And I have been on international flights so I can attest that the horizon rises to eye level at 38,000 feet. There is no way this happens on a globe." Lemme guess, you eyeballed it with nothing to use as a reference? I've been on international flights as well (including a few that would not exist were the Earth to be flat), and I had the sense to actually use a reference for eye level and guess what? The horizon dipped. I even photographed the horizon then squished the photograph horizontally to exaggerate the already existing curve. One more thing: this video DOES show curvature. Put a ruler up on the screen and you will see it. "Have you ever looked into Picard's first high altitude balloon ascent?" Yes. He too suggested bringing a ruler along to see the curvature. And besides, he was looking through a tiny fucking porthole, that's why he saw "upturned edges" "The reason this is news to you is that the whole education system (rocky feller funded) wants to dupe you and delude you. They aren't interested in creating actual thinkers. They want workers making them profits, so they dumb you down and program your beliefs. You have to challenge those beliefs and that programming or you will never get free. And worse, you will be arrogant about your ignorance." I have a bachelor's degree in Physics and Astronomy. I don't give a FUCK what some rando on UA-cam has to say about the education system of a country I don't even fucking live in.
@elyjahstark7549 Irrelevant point, simple minded troll. Stop projecting your obsession with 🌭 onto others, dick licker😂
@@a_forest_walker Hilarious how you tell people tondo their homework when you know zero math. My video shows the Horizon drops at FL 350 so you are wrong. You don't even know what Eye level means. You people play the expert when you are so far behind...
@@alexf962 okay tondo, did it take you all nine months to come up with that nothing burger? I love that the thumb nail itself reveals your ridiculousness. As I read your inane words I am looking at the eye level horizon from this high altitude. It is staring you in the face while your noodle is tying itself in knots trying not to see.
@@a_forest_walker Hilarious how angry you Always get. You can't handle being proven wrong huh. It's Easy to call "Word salad" what you Just can't handle. If you did your homework you would not have fallen for probably the dumbest scam ever invented. But please keep believing you have the higher ground here, it's hilarious.
112.905ft = 34.41344km
Why did it cut out from 25 to 60,000 ft?
Are you telling me you would have wanted to watch the whole half hour climb from 25 to 60 000 ft? There's a clock in the bottom right corner.
There is a curve, SS in the most highest moment. Put a straight line in the image beside the earth line, then reduce the width of the image by a large amount. You will see the curve very clearly
errr wrong mate
Don't try to explain that to someone who failed geometry, they can't understand that.
it's literally the camera lens's distrortion in the corners. You can see that when it is angled down the curvature is inverted.
@@johannesveike7407 I just double checked and nope, the horizon never actually goes concave in this video. If you insist it does, timestamp it please
@elyjahstark7549 Well you did timestamp it elsewhere...but yeah no, no lens distortion
Another video proving the earths flat with a couple hundred bucks debunking NASAs 100 billion dollar lie
Too bad there's actually some visible curve all the way up there. Get a ruler. I wonder where NASA got those $100 billion dollars, since its budget is only like a fifth of that
LOL, do you have a book in your house? I know you doesn't have a ruler, that's for people who finished elementary, put under the curve and weep!
@elyjahstark7549The irony.
@elyjahstark7549 Another delusional flerf making a fool of himself. Go get an education.
The sun rotates around the earth from east to west at a height that varies from 130 to 160 kilometers depending on the season, at a speed of approximately 1500 kilometers per hour. The sun moves following the tropics: when the sun is on the Tropic of Cancer, it is summer in our part of the world and winter in Australia, and when it is on the Tropic of Capricorn, it is winter here and summer in Australia. When the sun is on the equator, we experience spring or autumn. We don't always see the sun in our part of the world because its light gradually fades in our atmosphere, which has an average propagation speed of light of about 3·10'8 meters per second. This speed is higher than the average propagation speed of light in water, which is about 1.26·10'10 meters per second. In an ocean, light begins to lose its frequency/strength at a depth of 150 meters, due to the greater density of water (997 kg/m³), which creates darkness at a depth of 200 meters. In our atmosphere, the propagation of light is greater and can travel up to about 6,000 kilometers (depending on the season). In summer, however, the heat causes water to evaporate, which reduces visibility due to what is called the atmospheric visual block. The blue color of the sky during the day is due to the sun's radiation on our atmosphere at a concentration of 0 to 20 kilometers, gradually reaching an altitude of about 40 kilometers before fading among other lighter elements such as helium. Above the sun, there is only darkness, with the exception of stars, due to the absence of an atmosphere. The red color of the sunset is due to the frequency of light, which decreases as it passes through the atmosphere. The closer you are to the sun, the higher the frequency of light (1005-1035 THz 380-790 nm), while the outer edges of the solar halo have a much lower frequency (400-484 THz 625-740 nm), creating the red color. The sun does not actually set, but rather appears to do so due to the perspective created by our atmosphere, which acts like a magnifying lens. The illusion of the sunset can be observed by looking at the sun in the sky during winter, as it appears to shrink while moving away. This lens effect is also observed with the moon, which appears larger at the horizon during summer and smaller at the zenith, with a difference of up to 20%. The law that holds everything up is based on density and specific weight. For example, an apple falls to the ground because it is denser and heavier than air, but it floats in water due to its density and specific weight. Gravity, as it is commonly described, does not actually exist. Our weight is due to the density of our bodies, which is positioned between the earth and the air (human body density: 1040 kg/m3, air density: 1.225 kg/m3, ground density: 1800 kg/m3). Additionally, the weight of the atmospheric column above us (about 1000-1500 kg depending on the season) pushes us downward. When we go up a mountain, our weight decreases by a few grams because we are in a lower atmospheric column. The sun needs to be low to function.
density isn't a force
@@delayedcreator4783 density is a force, Archimedes' law proves it, this works in both negative and positive (up and down)! Moving matter creates energy!
@@emilianoantonini9375 density = mass / volume. Where is the force in that🤣🤣🤣.You will get nobel price if you prove that🤣
@@emilianoantonini9375 Archimedes' principle only works on the principle that the medium being displayed is denser, therefore heavier, than the object displacing it, to generate positive buoyancy. In other words, it depends on the materials' weight. Meaning it depends on gravity. Also Archimedes quite famously stated: “The surface of any fluid at rest is the surface of a sphere whose centre is the same as that of the Earth.”
@@javierlatorre480 No sorry! look... objects fall or rise vertically not due to a 'force of gravity', but due to the difference in density between the object itself and the surrounding medium. An object more dense than medium will tend to fall downwards, while one less dense will tend to rise upwards. For example, a stone falls through the air because it is denser than air. These motions also depend on the absolute density of the medium: with the same density difference between the object and the medium, the motion will be slower in a denser medium, due to the greater resistance encountered (e.g. a balloon in water rises more slowly than in 'air). Furthermore, Archimedes' law states that an immersed body receives an upward thrust equal to the weight of the displaced fluid. This helps explain buoyancy and suspension. In summary, in this alternative model, falls and vertical motions are explained by relative density, media drag and buoyancy, without invoking the existence of a 'gravitational force'."
Kamu telah menunjukkan kebenaran kawan 👍
There was no curvature in horizont?
There is. Grab a ruler
earth is flat..
But evidence points the other way...
Your mind is flat.
Sure looks pretty flat to me people
At an altitude of 100,000 feet with a low field of view? Of course it does.
Get a ruler, that should help
Yawn. God isn't real and the Earth is a Globe. Get used to it finally!
Anybody seen a Chinese weather balloon.🎈
Still flat!! Oops.
@@CAMlCAZl No. If you don't see what I see it was censorship by the content maker. If we live on a giant spinning spherical water world space ball spinning faster than a BULLET at the EQUATOR where is one IOTA of PRESENCE, SUBSTANCE , FORM or PHYSICALITY of GRAVITY ITSELF???
@@ramonortiz7462 another red herring fallacy huh? Answer the arguments presented against your previous claim, and then we can take a long look at your other claims. You claimed the horizon was flat. I presented video evidence debunking that claim. You have now tried twice to disregard said debunking without giving a reasoning why. Provide the reasoning why my debunking isnt valid, or accept that the horizon is convex at 100 000+ feet altitude. After you have done that, then we can go through your gravity or neil tyson topics one at a time.
@@CAMlCAZl I may do so. Oops already have. Acclaimed PHYSICIST NDTYSON ADMITS that you cannot see the curvature of the earth at 60+ miles in altitude looking down or out ACROSS the earth!! Gotta shine some Tiffany silver.
@@CAMlCAZl You think sending up a fish eye lens on the calmest of days will reaffirm your dying model?? Nope!!
NDTYSON ADMITS you cannot see the curvature of the earth at 60+ miles in altitude!!!! ua-cam.com/video/vjnLJtBtVeE/v-deo.html