General Liu's Chinese Semiauto Rifle from WWI

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 21 сер 2024
  • Cool Forgotten Weapons Merch! shop.bbtv.com/c...
    The General Liu rifle (named for its designer - it never received an official designation that we know of) was China’s closest approach to an indigenous self-loading infantry rifle before World War II. Mechanically it used the same principles as the Danish Bang rifle - a muzzle cup captured some of the gases from firing and was pulled forward, moving a cam and lever that cycled the bolt. Liu was appointed head of the Hanyang Arsenal, and used the opportunity to put a new semiautomatic rifle into production.
    The Pratt & Whitney company of Hartford was contracted to supply the machinery to mass-produce the rifle, and about a dozen sample rifles were built by P&W. They were tested in China and met with general approval, and the machinery was loaded up and shipped to Shanghai. Unfortunately, General Liu suffered a stroke and either died or was incapacitated (sources differ on this) before the tooling arrived, and it ended up sitting on the docks for years, as the rifle project foundered and never cam to fruition without Liu’s supervision. The tools were eventually sent to an arsenal and repurposed for producing other guns.
    English and Chinese testing reports are here: www.forgottenwe...
    / forgottenweapons
    Related:
    Gas-Trap M1 Garand: • Gas Trap M1 Garand
    Gewehr 41(Mauser): • Mauser's Gewehr 41(M) ...
    Pedersen GX & GY: • GX vs GY: What Are the...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 873

  • @maniacaudiophile
    @maniacaudiophile 7 років тому +1379

    the manufacturer's marking
    陸軍漢陽兵工廠製
    陸軍 = Army
    漢陽 = Han Yang (location)
    兵工廠 = arsenal
    製 = made
    made by army Han Yang arsenal
    the word on the cap is
    自 = Self (I think they want to denote 自動, which means "move by itself" or auto)
    普 = Normal

    • @user-ro9zf9kz1h
      @user-ro9zf9kz1h 5 років тому +68

      great translation, well done

    • @HunterKiller762
      @HunterKiller762 4 роки тому +14

      Huh, neat

    • @walker_2003
      @walker_2003 4 роки тому +13

      Thanks mate.

    • @screamsinrussian5773
      @screamsinrussian5773 4 роки тому +19

      late reply, but thanks for the translation my man, real MVP

    • @metalman6708
      @metalman6708 4 роки тому +12

      But how do you remember all the symbols? We have what 26 letters we put together. I don't understand how you can possibly have a different symbol for every word. That's one language you want to know from birth I think.

  • @Lectiuss
    @Lectiuss 7 років тому +1485

    Estimated Price: $6,500 - $11,000
    Sold for: $80,500

    • @MrBioniclefan1
      @MrBioniclefan1 6 років тому +170

      Yeah I bet the owner that was selling the gun was surprised by the amount of money he or she made.

    • @StAlchemyst
      @StAlchemyst 6 років тому +143

      some rich Chinese robber baron I'm assuming.

    • @Er_Lolers
      @Er_Lolers 5 років тому +14

      Holly shit

    • @crazyfvck
      @crazyfvck 5 років тому +85

      @Lectiuss I can't help but wonder how much it would have sold for if Ian hadn't done a video on it ;)

    • @nathanb.8114
      @nathanb.8114 5 років тому +96

      There’s only less than 13 of those rifles today. Obviously it would be sold at such a price. Those are the legit ones, they dont manufacture them anymore.

  • @Bytional
    @Bytional 7 років тому +1818

    Liu suffered cerebral hemorrhage from that stroke, and never recover, not died right away but passed away in 1929. He was always getting pushed by a few warlords in China, so after he was in hospital, they just tried everything to ruin his works.
    He was from my hometown(and sort of related), one of my great-grandmother come from that family, so I've heard of him, I was only told he was more like a old school professor than a general.

    • @ForgottenWeapons
      @ForgottenWeapons  7 років тому +483

      Thanks!

    • @Cue633
      @Cue633 6 років тому +71

      Yingdi Xu had the commies not started their rebel against the ROC government China would be much better off today.

    • @HaloFTW55
      @HaloFTW55 6 років тому +106

      "China would be much better off today"
      Up for debate, we are unable to tell if the corruption would be fixed, if China continued as it was, it would rival Italy for corruption in Government. As for the death toll, the possible purges conducted out of paranoia wouldn't rival that of Mao's death tolls but would reach the millions for sure. As for industrializing the Nation, it would be a slow process assuming the US stayed out of assisting China rebuild and China would remain a 3rd World Country today.

    • @junichiroyamashita
      @junichiroyamashita 6 років тому +26

      @@HaloFTW55 well ,reaching the same level of Italy would be difficult

    • @planescaped
      @planescaped 5 років тому +29

      ​@@yingdixu9213 The mandate of heaven really fucked china up in the end. It's amazing an empire with succession laws of basically 'if you're strong enough to seize power then you're emperor' survived.

  • @MrLoobu
    @MrLoobu 7 років тому +925

    Damn, a lot of people like to make fun of Chinese firearm lineage but this general liu back in 1916 knew what the fuck he was doing!

    • @vguyver2
      @vguyver2 7 років тому +126

      The Liu as way was ahead of his time, and the design isn't some copy like many other nations attempting to start. I'm curious if Liu created anymore gun designs such as pistols.

    • @MrLoobu
      @MrLoobu 7 років тому +45

      +V Guyver It is unlikely that he would have been aware of some of the german and Hungarian prototypes out around that time right? The system seems more akin to some 20s and 30s designs, but even most of those weren't really good. Can you imagine something similar happening today? Like if apple started producing laser guns for China today decades ahead of the states lol.

    • @baker90338
      @baker90338 7 років тому +3

      Meh I have seen a laser shotgun before.

    • @amperzand9162
      @amperzand9162 7 років тому +24

      The only practical lethal-purpose laser weapons thus far are ship-mounted.

    • @vguyver2
      @vguyver2 7 років тому +5

      Amperzand They need a large amount of power. Trying to miniaturize one into a small arms class of weaponry is going to be impractical.

  • @ummdustry5718
    @ummdustry5718 4 роки тому +101

    8:36 "The bullet of course goes out this hole in the middle."
    I learn so much about fire arms watching this NGL.

  • @Jesses001
    @Jesses001 7 років тому +261

    For its time, this is actually a rather good design. It seems that bad timing was the thing that killed this rifle.

  • @p.cake7434
    @p.cake7434 3 роки тому +57

    Born in 1869? You already know this man is gonna be successful.

  • @Pre114
    @Pre114 7 років тому +493

    The receiver marking says, "Manufactured by the Army Hanyan Arsenal."

    • @zidan1hao917
      @zidan1hao917 6 років тому +5

      PW did the work of making stamping tools

    • @zerg49
      @zerg49 6 років тому +1

      Pre114 thanks!

    • @xianyu2094
      @xianyu2094 5 років тому +3

      It‘s Hanyang😄

    • @EzraMerr
      @EzraMerr 5 років тому +2

      it depends on the Latin or Roman phonetics, both are correct forms

    • @youngpark9729
      @youngpark9729 4 роки тому +2

      @@xianyu2094 it's later explained in the video that pw manufactured it.

  • @wildairsoft1
    @wildairsoft1 5 років тому +150

    This rifle looks 10 maybe 20 years old its in remarkable condition.

  • @yangcheng-jyun8542
    @yangcheng-jyun8542 7 років тому +648

    Hey Ian!I have submitted a Chinese subtitle for the video,which I believe is 100% correct on meaning,but fail to reproduce your unique speaking habit and rhyme,that's just too hard for me.
    In fact,the most parts of the subtitle have been finished months ago.However,I'm a senior in highschool.In Taiwan,it means that I could have barely time to do what I want to do and what I think is important to do.
    My English listening and reading abilities is far beyond the average degree of Taiwanese highschool student,while my writing ability isn't remarkable so my grammar might be very weird.
    As the first self-loading rifle design by Chinese,General Liu's SLR is definitely an interesting piece of Modern Chinese History.It's simply named '自裝槍' because there wasn't any other self-loading rifle had been recognized by Chinese!
    1916 is the start of the warlord age,and General Liu's losing control on Han Yang Arsenal was largely because his relationship with the warlords who's occupying Han Yang(Wu Pei Fu and Cao Kun)wasn't very well.
    A source of information said Liu had submit the rifle design to the rifle trial of U.S. Army in 1918.It also mentions that Julian Hatcher's "Hatcher's Notebook" have contents about his meeting with General Liu.
    Even if the SLR had started production successfully,China didn't have the ability to produce the material needed for the self-loading rifle manufacture at that time.It means that the SLR would only be sent to the elite troops of the warlord who was controlling arsenal,instead of National Revolutionary Army or the Northern Government.
    Well,once NRA took over Han Yang in 1926,the SLR might have the chance to become a main rifle in Second Sino-Japanese War and China Civil War.If they had been captured by PRC,they would have a chance to show up in Korean War!
    There is no denying that Liu's SLR has the potential to develope into a great self-loading rifle design.The locking mechanism is similar to Mannlicher 1886/1888 because there were copies of them had been manufacturing in China since Ching Dynasty.It seems that the SLR can easily adopt the bolt design of Mannlicher 1895,getting rid of the durability problem.
    The muzzle cup system of SLR is very likely to be much more reliable than Bang rifle,since it directly use the blowing power of the firing instead of redirecting them to push the piston.There's a lot to say,but I'm a little bit lazy to do that...
    General Liu's another work is the copy of Browning M1917,which was produce in Han Yang Arsenal after 1921.
    It's a shame that most of the Chinese people still believe that the first self-loading rifle in China is Garand,another little number of them know ZH-29,hardly anybody have heard of Liu's Rifle.
    Let the forgotten designer and rifle never be forgotten,that's the reason why I made the subtitle.

    • @hcrdfju4954
      @hcrdfju4954 6 років тому +6

      楊程鈞 4:50是「中風」,不是「打擊」

    • @arieltolosachang6649
      @arieltolosachang6649 6 років тому +4

      翻译的真的很好,您的英文水平很高

    • @simonp347
      @simonp347 6 років тому +3

      翻译得大好!BTW这枪一般就叫做 刘氏自装枪, 没有正式的型号

    • @adrianfirewalker4183
      @adrianfirewalker4183 5 років тому +1

      Interesting!

    • @valia
      @valia 5 років тому +2

      Great work, buddy. 感谢你的翻译。

  • @yoitired
    @yoitired 6 років тому +73

    That'd be scary, having that bolt flying right at your eyeball, still a big shame that Liu couldn't finish this project.

  • @chuckwingo11
    @chuckwingo11 3 роки тому +64

    If it exists, I would love to see a report from Pratt & Whitney regarding what they thought of the rifle. Not as a manufacturing project, but as a practical battlefield weapon

  • @jeremyj.5687
    @jeremyj.5687 7 років тому +180

    Before having seen anything of the video, I can already say "What a goddamn beautiful firearm". The dark wood, th old-style upper, the sights... Stunning :)

    • @Regolith86
      @Regolith86 7 років тому +30

      Except for the open area behind the receiver, I agree. They really should have slapped a dust cover on that; it would have prevented some potential malfunctions and made it better looking.

    • @Snaake42
      @Snaake42 7 років тому +22

      And helped with the worry the testers had about the action hitting soldiers in the face, if they weren't trained properly.

  • @hattyhatington1956
    @hattyhatington1956 7 років тому +1385

    sounds like a unique weapon from Fallout 3.

  • @mannyowlstein8144
    @mannyowlstein8144 7 років тому +41

    For as early of a semi-auto as that is it is impressively simple.

  • @maxgraham91295
    @maxgraham91295 7 років тому +45

    As someone from Connecticut, it's really interesting how much the state contributed to firearms history

    • @1978garfield
      @1978garfield 4 роки тому +12

      Sad to see how CT,MA and other states where the US firearm industry started have become so anti gun.

    • @KA-vs7nl
      @KA-vs7nl 2 роки тому +1

      @@1978garfield be scared sheep

    • @nickbuckley4371
      @nickbuckley4371 Рік тому +1

      It is we had so many legendary guns come from each state now they are forgotten

    • @roryhennessey1983
      @roryhennessey1983 Рік тому

      ​@nickbuckley4371 it keeps Ian in business

    • @stinkfun
      @stinkfun 10 місяців тому

      @@1978garfield Not anti-gun, but more accurately pro-"strict rules on getting and owning a gun". I've lived in both CT and MA and know many people who have gone through the process and happily own handguns and long guns.

  • @tillmannfischer
    @tillmannfischer 7 років тому +30

    Damn, that single-shot mechanism is the work of a genius.

  • @tcorris
    @tcorris 3 роки тому +5

    Pratt and Whitney Tool is an entirely different company from the famous Pratt and Whitney Aircraft engine maker. Pratt and Whitney Aircraft licensed the name Pratt and Whitney from the well known toolmaker when they began making engines on the 1920’s. Pratt and Whitney Tool made some pretty big machine tools, including a 12x30” lathe as recently as the 60s. They still exist in Hartford but they now stick to fine measurement tools.

    • @A-G-F-
      @A-G-F- 3 роки тому

      Interesting, thanks for sharing!

  • @liquidminds
    @liquidminds 7 років тому +189

    Makes it probably the only rifle in human history, that got not built, because a war started...

    • @RukaSubCh
      @RukaSubCh 7 років тому +56

      liquidminds there are many countries that abandoned their self loading rifle programs at the outbreak of WW1.

    • @jakewolf079
      @jakewolf079 7 років тому +19

      the SAFN49 wants to have a talk with you.

    • @abergethirty
      @abergethirty 7 років тому +35

      Makes you wonder if Bolt Action Rifles would have become obsolete much earlier if WWI hadn't created such a surplus of them.

    • @rahbaralhaq
      @rahbaralhaq 7 років тому +30

      You must be new to this Channel....

    • @troyweatherford2428
      @troyweatherford2428 7 років тому +8

      liquidminds you're in for an education bud

  • @tylergordon696
    @tylergordon696 7 років тому +11

    I have always loved the 1st few generation of semi autos(rifles and pistols).
    All of the different designs, concepts and ideas has always intrested me.

  • @kylecho2912
    @kylecho2912 7 років тому +15

    I love how whoever was editing the video actually used the right Chinese national flag in 1910s :D
    good work

  • @mux020
    @mux020 7 років тому +56

    “自” (zi)is short for 自動 which means automatic,“普” (pu)is probably short for 普通 which means normal/regular.

  • @ttian2
    @ttian2 7 років тому +13

    Hi Ian just wanna say thank you for all the good and rare information you shared with us. your pronunciation of the chinese arsenal names are almost perfect already. I easily understood them: "Han yang" and "gong xian". around 8:00 in the video while showing the semi-auto / single shot switch, the characters on the switch shows as 自 (short form of 自動, which means automatic. character 自 itself means self) and 普(short form of 普通, which means normal) . despite the rifle itself has semi-auto and single shot releasing modes, the markings actually means "auto" and "normal". he could have chosen another character 半 which refers to semi. this still does make sense as back in 1910s there isn't any infantry rifles that has full automatic mode in the chinese market so that I guess mark it as "automatic" is still acceptable. in addition, they probably treated bolt action single shot rifles as common and normal , while semi-auto rifles were something new and fancy, thus mark single shot mode as "normal" also makes sense. I actually wonder if there could be any other rifle model that marks the firing mode same way as this general liu's. probably very low possibility as most of the later chinese guns were marked with symbols or characters that directly translates to single, semi, and auto to avoid confusion between semi-auto and auto.

  • @KoIossov
    @KoIossov 7 років тому +10

    I love some of the stories Ian tells on this channel. I'd never have known any of this..

  • @thegoldencaulk2742
    @thegoldencaulk2742 7 років тому +512

    Damn this is a really smart design. Shame about that whole war thing getting in the way

    • @a13605
      @a13605 6 років тому +73

      Someone sounds a bit jealous.

    •  6 років тому +27

      No one talks smack to someone with a picture of Mike Stoklasa

    • @EvilWiffles
      @EvilWiffles 6 років тому +5

      Not the war that got in the way. More like stroke.

    • @adamdougherty216
      @adamdougherty216 6 років тому +28

      Ironic that a war delayed the production of a military weapon

    • @nathanb.8114
      @nathanb.8114 5 років тому +4

      All Roads Lead Here you are not explaining yourself adequately

  • @gat569
    @gat569 7 років тому +23

    the auction site says it sold for $80,500! Wow.

  • @gavindavies793
    @gavindavies793 7 років тому +28

    Looks to be a VERY well thought out rifle. Looks no more complicated to strip and clean than a modern assault rifle (although the only one I'm familiar with is the SA80-A2, the nice H&K reworked model), maybe with the exception of the recoil spring removal. Should be an easy conversion to a thumb screw type action though. Regarding the locking system, it looks as if were the pin to deform at all then the load would transfer directly onto the bolt body via that nice strong looking material in front of the lever. I'm really REALLY impressed with it to be fair. Looks like a nice idea. I mean, the gas system would be a doddle to clean compared to most. Fitted with a shorter barrel and a longer double stack single feed box magazine this wouldn't have looked out of place into the M14 era.

  • @jgedutis
    @jgedutis 7 років тому +29

    The only think I used to not like about your videos is that they ended to quickly. Thanks for 2 days in a row of 20 minutes of gun goodness.

  • @CosmasBauer
    @CosmasBauer 7 років тому +118

    Hey Ian, as usual a very very interesting video! I have one question: I have seen this kind of disconnect in a number of firearms on your show. Wouldn't that mechanism allow the rifle to fire fully automatic or at least to double fire when you're holding the trigger at juuust the right spot? I ask because the trigger is not actively disconnected by reciprocating bolt.

    • @quiglypigly
      @quiglypigly 7 років тому +30

      I would think it would be near impossible to be able to hold it in that insanely precise spot under recoil of all that mass. Also, there is always the possibility it's an incredibly well timed mechanism, to the point there is no conceivable difference from the point when the sear can let it fly to the point the 'arm' breaks free.

    • @CosmasBauer
      @CosmasBauer 7 років тому +14

      Good points. I think you're definitely right on the first one. The second one I'm not so sure, because as the parts wear, and I'm assuming that they are wearing somewhat unevenly, that precise timing could be thrown way off. But maybe these parts just don't wear enogh during whatever life time this firearm has.

    • @quiglypigly
      @quiglypigly 7 років тому +3

      I'm just talkin theories. ;-D

    • @stonebone1179
      @stonebone1179 6 років тому +4

      Striker would follow and probably not fire the gun

    • @wills2140
      @wills2140 6 років тому +3

      I was thinking something similar, but the the triger catch looks too small to actively hold the triger in the firing position. The thing is if you *enlarge* the bottom of the triger catch, it should hold the sear down with the triger being held back, creating a full auto rifle (with all of 6 shots in the mag well).

  • @heinrichfuhrmeister1244
    @heinrichfuhrmeister1244 6 років тому +11

    the selector says"自“ (self) for self-loading semiauto, and “普” (reg) for regular bolt action

  • @LionofCaliban
    @LionofCaliban 7 років тому +3

    For a gas trap system, I think that's pretty elegant. It's definitely got issues, but the rifle body seems to keep everything inside nice and clean.

  • @Zerosen89
    @Zerosen89 6 років тому +3

    well at least this gun now lives on in BF1 as a DLC medic rifle

  • @danielwang2956
    @danielwang2956 6 років тому +2

    The first marking on the muzzle cap:“自” directly translates into "by one's self", which can be interpreted as an abbreviation for “自动”---"automatic", which is what semiautomatic used to be called before fully automatic existed. The second marking on the muzzle cap: "普" is an abbreviated form of "普通" which means "regular". Given how most other rifles functioned back then, "regular" refers to a bolt action firing mode.

  • @mattk1785
    @mattk1785 7 років тому +81

    Interesting, a product made in the US for China, will we ever see that again? And fine craftsmanship at that!

    • @vulekv93
      @vulekv93 5 років тому +10

      some of the chips used in phones are made in USA, also some of the software is made and exported too, you could argue that software is finely crafted...

    • @dillonc7955
      @dillonc7955 5 років тому +4

      Not as of today with Trump's administration in office. If the US tried something like this today, the US would probably put trade tariffs on parts for the gun that are double the price of the gun itself and there would be no profit for the Chinese whatsoever.

    • @stargate12345678
      @stargate12345678 5 років тому +5

      Before the Communist Party took over after WWII, Sino-American relations were pretty good and they were close allies in World War II, but unfortunately the Communists took over so the West rejected China from that point onwards, hence history between the West and China.

    • @ScottKenny1978
      @ScottKenny1978 4 роки тому +10

      @@stargate12345678 eh, not entirely. The US actually told Mao to finish his civil war in 1949, but by the time Mao got all the troops and transport in place, this idiot by the name of Kim invaded south Korea and scared the US that communism was trying to take over the world. And that scare led the US to tell Mao that he could invade Taiwan only after going through the Seventh Fleet.

    • @hailexiao2770
      @hailexiao2770 4 роки тому +4

      @@stargate12345678 There was also a period (~1970-1989) when the two countries were sorta-allies against the Soviet Union.

  • @Arthurzeiro
    @Arthurzeiro 7 років тому +3

    Rock Island's page listed an estimated price between 6500 and 11000 dollars for it, and it sold for over 80k, wow.

    • @ForgottenWeapons
      @ForgottenWeapons  7 років тому +5

      Yes, two people got into a bidding war over it.

  • @derekdelamar
    @derekdelamar 6 років тому +8

    Their is also a Pratt and Whitney in Alabama. I believe it started life around Eli Whitney's cotton gin. Their was a building still standing, just a few years ago that had a Pratt and Whitney carriage company sign still on the front. This is located in Prattville Alabama. I wonder if Daniel Pratt had anything to do with the name of the town... lol.

  • @jasward3826
    @jasward3826 7 років тому +2

    I love seeing how these old rifles work, definitely one of my favorite channels

  • @Old299dfk
    @Old299dfk 3 роки тому +3

    One of the best guns in BF1

    • @darthvader9173
      @darthvader9173 3 роки тому +1

      i get one service star per day using that gun LOL

  • @ristoalanko9281
    @ristoalanko9281 7 років тому +2

    This may be a scary rifle to shoot... the whole bolt carrier rushes straight at your aiming eye like an express train, just like in a Sjögren shotgun.

  • @Verthias
    @Verthias 6 років тому +1

    Have to appreciate the high quality of machine work that went into building this rifle, it looks better than some rifles that were built many decades later and even today.

  • @derp-construction3341
    @derp-construction3341 5 років тому +6

    All a college level vintage weapon course really needs is to have the curriculum consist of this channel.

  • @rustyteague8574
    @rustyteague8574 5 років тому +2

    i love it , cheap , simple , and looks like it would work everytime

  • @Ghost_Of_SAS
    @Ghost_Of_SAS 7 років тому +192

    General Liu: the Chinese version of The Dukes of Hazzard.

    • @edison7300037
      @edison7300037 6 років тому +1

      nah, i'm think that's the emblem/crest of Matsudaira clan, later became the emblem of Tokugawa

    • @junichiroyamashita
      @junichiroyamashita 6 років тому

      @Neurofunke that is the Tokugawa Hollyhock

  • @wangl601
    @wangl601 7 років тому +9

    At 5:19
    It is "Gong Xian(鞏縣 /巩县) arsenal". Gong Xian is the name of the location.

    • @wangl601
      @wangl601 7 років тому +4

      Oh, at 8:11, the character "普" from word "普通" means "regular" and the character "自" from word "自動"(automatic) means (semi)automatic.

  • @johnnschroeder7424
    @johnnschroeder7424 7 років тому +7

    A clean design, sad it never had the chance to be developed to a more effective model.

  • @BigBoo64
    @BigBoo64 7 років тому +29

    You can put this in the BF1 playlist now.

  • @Gray-Wolf
    @Gray-Wolf 5 років тому +2

    Old rifles like this just fascinate me

  • @worddunlap
    @worddunlap 7 років тому +6

    Quite nice machine work for the time period. Also the metal seemed to be high quality to machine so well and hold up. Pratt Whitney did a great job.

  • @NeedForSpeed.2004
    @NeedForSpeed.2004 3 роки тому +1

    September 8, 1916
    Army Materiel Command’s test in Nan-Yuan Proving Grounds on the new rifle by General Liu Qing-En, referred to as the self-loading rifle (‘SLR’)
    Details of the SLR are as follows:-
    Caliber - 7.9mm
    Length - 703.1mm
    Muzzle Velocity - 780m/s
    Weight - 5kg with bayonet attached
    Firing rate - 50 rounds/minute
    Magazine capacity - 6 round clip internal magazine
    The report by Army Materiel Command on the test-firing of Chief Superintendent Liu’s SLR goes on to describe the major parts of the SLR (Report also details the test-firing of an anti- aircraft machine gun modeled on the Danish Madsen gun) as follows:-
    i) Muzzle and gas regulator
    ii) Barrel and Receiver (sliding block)
    iii) Boltcarrier
    iv) Operating mechanism (piston, cocking piece, driving spring & buffer spring)
    The SLR is heavier than the average infantry rifle by 1 catty (Chinese unit of measurement, equivalent to around 604.8 grams during the administration of the Republican government but has been revised by the PRC government to be equivalent to 500 grams) and consist of a total of 94 parts. Briefly, the self loading mechanism uses gas expelled by the cartridge and as the round leaves the barrel, the muzzle gas trap cap (with three holes for adjustment) starts extending forwards triggering the operating mechanism which moves the bolt carrier rearwards extracting and chambering the next round as well as locking the bolt. When all the rounds are expended, the bolt is unlocked and the loading chamber is exposed. If the user wishes to convert the SLR from ‘self-loading’ to ‘manual’ (single shot bolt), he can do so by turning the muzzle gas trap cap clockwise, sealing the cap and seizing the self loading function.
    During initial trails, an example of the SLR manufactured by the Han Yang Arsenal was tested and the self loading mechanism seized. According to Superintendent Liu, the fault lies with the driving spring which was hand-made due to a lack of machinery at the arsenal and therefore not up to the required tolerances. Following this, an example of the SLR manufactured in America was tested and went through 6 magazine clips with no issues or stoppages. A rough calculation placed the firing rate at 40 rounds per minute based on a magazine clip of 6 rounds. However there were issues with target acquisition and aiming, although recoil is minimal, the ejection action and gas action at the muzzle gas trap cap
    inadvertently causes the muzzle to climb which cannot be negated as the entire weight of the rifle is supported the firer’s left arm.
    In addition, due to inconsistencies in the propellants of the cartridges fired by the SLR, stoppages occurred when the bolt was unable to lock or when the driving spring engaged too quickly. Another point to note was the tendency of the sliding block receiver to run into the face of the firer, in particular since most of the firers are used to bolt action rifles with action of length 10cm or less. This was no fault of the design of the SLR but emphasis should be placed upon this during training. Further, during manual fire (bolt action), there were instances of “double feeding”. Otherwise, the SLR had no faults.
    There has been no developments in this nation’s firearms for sometime now, Superintendent Liu’s effort has been validated both in theory and in practice and the results are promising in the particular the results of the test is impressive. We note that the SLR functions best in repeating fire and although this expends vast amounts of ammunition, there are occasions where this may be called for.
    September 13, 1916
    Minutes of the Meeting of the Army Materiel Command
    The following were discussed:-
    i. The SLR is indeed heavier than the standard infantry rifle.
    ii. Steel needed for production must be imported.
    iii. The raw material costs per weapon must cost more than 2 Yuan (currency denomination of the then Nationalist Government) over the current infantry rifle.
    iv. Whether the muzzle gas trap cap will be affected by dust and dirt and whether it can be turned smoothly and effectively in a battlefield situation is something that can only be addressed when the SLR is in general issue.
    v. What is the bore erosion rate? For example, German made steel is affected by bore erosion after 5,000 rounds.
    vi. Will the bolt carrier and sliding bolt overheat and seized?
    vii. The rear of the SLR is exceedingly long, how will target acquisition and aiming be affected?
    It is resolved that Superintendent Liu conduct further tests at the Officer Cadet School and thereafter modify the SLR accordingly and send them to the infantry unit for field tests along with the requisite manual and instructions. Further, the steel for the manufacture of the SLR should be purchased from Germany or Sweden. As for the ammunition, it should be purchased as the current stock is inadequate and inappropriate. Although we may have the capacity to forge steel and the arsenals have the capability to manufacture ammunition, the competency is far from desirable but can be overcome with further research and development.

  • @joephysics5469
    @joephysics5469 5 років тому +2

    Great video Ian. The mechanics of that rifle are very interesting.

  • @braydenh190
    @braydenh190 6 років тому +63

    Just unlocked the last variant of this fine rifle in BF1.

    • @edison7300037
      @edison7300037 6 років тому +1

      which makes no any sense.(i mean the history, not about your gaming skill)

    • @georgewells6597
      @georgewells6597 6 років тому

      KainetheWusky its my fav medic rifle

    • @PHURHXD
      @PHURHXD 6 років тому +1

      KainetheWusky nice, high five furry friend :D

  • @mathisurien4031
    @mathisurien4031 5 років тому +1

    trying to shoot that thing must be terrifying! that bolt is massive and it flies backwards straight into your face.

  • @AmesRed
    @AmesRed 7 років тому +1

    What an impressively intricate firearm. Amazing that there were such talented engineers in China at the time.

  • @jakewolf079
    @jakewolf079 7 років тому +253

    this ''China'' is now my country Taiwan, the ROC (Republic of China).
    just in case you didn't know, after WWII there was a revolution in China, and the communist kick us out of mainland China and proceed to form their own new government, which is the China you see today, the PRC (People's Republic of China).
    the ROC retreated to the island now called Taiwan and then we never fight back after that. There was a point where China and Soviet split (the so called Sino-Soviet split) and the US considered helping us retake the China in order to fight against commmunism, similiar to the situation in Vietnam and Korea. But it never happened.
    as a gun enthusiast, It's so fascinating to see this gun in action (by ''action'' I mean the gun is not just in pictures).
    back then we have resources and power, we copied a bunch of weapon that we considered to be good, such as the Hanyang Type 88 (based on the Mauser Gewehr 98) and the Shanxi Type 17 (basically Mauser Broomhandle in .45ACP), but we also try to innovate and create something new, this rifle is an example.
    I still consider myself a part of the old China, the China that fought the World War II with the allies.
    well, time has changed, and I think we should move on, nowadays we just call ourselves Taiwanese, there's no point trying to be China anymore, the world has long forgotten us.
    by the way, we still use Traiditional Chinese, that's the language you'll see on this gun's report.

    • @qq497986135
      @qq497986135 7 років тому +15

      by PRC lol

    • @MichaelBerthelsen
      @MichaelBerthelsen 7 років тому +16

      Beast of the Far East I don't know if you can claim that's 'your' China, since Sun Yat-sen founded the Republic, which both Mainland and ROC claims to be the decendents of. He formed the republic long before Chiang-kai or Mao became relevant...

    • @kylec.6818
      @kylec.6818 7 років тому +13

      Beast of the Far East I hope you can eventually take back the rest of your country from the oppressive communist regime that now rules it.

    • @simonp347
      @simonp347 7 років тому +9

      Beast of the Far East Yes, whining about how KMT lost the war is all this channel is about.... keep the political talk to yourself, sir

    • @MichaelBerthelsen
      @MichaelBerthelsen 7 років тому +8

      jeffery lee The US does NOT spend 54% of its GDP on the military. That would leave the country crippled... It's closer to 3.5%, 2.1% for Mainland.

  • @matthewmcneany
    @matthewmcneany 7 років тому +6

    "It's a little hazy exactly what happened here" Early C20th Chinese history summed up right there.

  • @thejoshchannel45
    @thejoshchannel45 4 роки тому +4

    Imagine getting your face too close to the bolt and just getting absolutely *SMACKED*

  • @ZGryphon
    @ZGryphon 7 років тому +3

    Man, did Søren Bang have the greatest name for a firearms designer or what?

  • @sadwingsraging3044
    @sadwingsraging3044 4 роки тому +1

    The receiver markings are ancient Chinese proverb. Say 'Every action equal & opposite' and I believe it says 'dummy' on that last bit there.
    Cheek weld that thing wrong and you would wish for a scope ring black eye instead.

  • @nitro105
    @nitro105 6 років тому +3

    As a machinist I marvel at the amount of work it would take to make such a complex mechanism. Great video thanks. I'd like to see more artillery and big guns

    • @XH1927
      @XH1927 11 місяців тому

      You must be a poor machinist
      ETA: Or trained solely on CNC, which is to say a professional but not actually a machinist at all

  • @HCvertigo
    @HCvertigo 7 років тому +1

    That in one really complicated firearm! I can only imagine the amount of machining that would go into building that sort of weapon.

  • @Guoenyi
    @Guoenyi 7 років тому +17

    Receiver marking says "Made by Hanyang Army Arsenal". Firing mode selector says 自 for auto (semi-auto) and 普 for normal (Manual). Gosh I was shocked when I see such well made rifle by Chinese arsennal of that time but it was actually made in US... I wonder if there are Chinese made ones to compare with.

    • @WildBillCox13
      @WildBillCox13 7 років тому +1

      Thanks.

    • @zidan1hao917
      @zidan1hao917 6 років тому +1

      Chinese, even got the tool to built it, can't produce much. Industry sucks so much that sth like this rifle that need good quality of steel is sth Chinese can't produce that time, not mentioning the illiterate farmer based work force.Really, it is a dream that is no way close to affordable for Liu, for the Chinese

    • @zidan1hao917
      @zidan1hao917 6 років тому

      After 30 years, the chinese would put type 56 semi--just the SkS, as their prime weapon

  • @TheZombieburner
    @TheZombieburner 7 років тому +129

    I've never seen the Pre-Communist Chinese flag before. It's pretty.

    • @PlatinumPerson_
      @PlatinumPerson_ 7 років тому +3

      TheZombieburner Seychelles flag is the best IMO

    • @HaloFTW55
      @HaloFTW55 6 років тому +35

      That's the Pre-Republic

    • @vukhuathuy2866
      @vukhuathuy2866 4 роки тому +11

      @@HaloFTW55 that's the first Republic

    • @ericlai1659
      @ericlai1659 4 роки тому +17

      @Zachary Durocher Yes five major ethnic groups.
      Red: Mandarin/Han
      Yellow: Manchu
      Blue: Mongolian
      White: Muslim (Uyghur and Donggan)
      Black: Tibetan

    • @rustym.shackelford5546
      @rustym.shackelford5546 3 роки тому

      @@ericlai1659 Then there's Manchukuo's use of that:
      Red - Japanese
      Blue - Mongols
      White - Han Chinese
      Yellow - Manchus
      Black - Koreans

  • @ScottKenny1978
    @ScottKenny1978 4 роки тому +1

    These early auto loaders are so fascinating!

  • @johnboy7077
    @johnboy7077 7 років тому +1

    I just watched your original video about the General Liu yesterday and was wondering if you would make another
    Glad you did fam

  • @cadenhood
    @cadenhood Рік тому +1

    Liu tried so hard and got so far but in the end doesn't even matter!

  • @PHURHXD
    @PHURHXD 6 років тому +3

    It looks like if an m1 garand and an svt and the gewehr 43 had a baby

  • @Oberkaptain
    @Oberkaptain 7 років тому +1

    That is beautifully machined.

  • @danielclermont4631
    @danielclermont4631 2 роки тому

    Remarkable design....thanks Ian.

  • @edwardjing5539
    @edwardjing5539 7 років тому

    Thank You very much Forgotten Weapon. I'm Chinese but I didn't know this guy before. The Beiyang Army were really the unsung heroes of Chinese history.

  • @ArmchairStrategist
    @ArmchairStrategist 7 років тому

    Really cool Old World engineering and story. Thanks for the video Ian.

  • @JB_Shryke
    @JB_Shryke 7 років тому +98

    Will we ever see the Walter WA 2000 sniper rifle on the channel?

    • @ForgottenWeapons
      @ForgottenWeapons  7 років тому +126

      If I ever find one.

    • @JB_Shryke
      @JB_Shryke 7 років тому +7

      Forgotten Weapons Are they really that rare?

    • @AWPtical800
      @AWPtical800 7 років тому +26

      there were only 176 ever made.

    • @Ducati121
      @Ducati121 7 років тому +60

      theres only like 12 in the US and one guy owns 9 of them

    • @SuperFunkmachine
      @SuperFunkmachine 7 років тому +28

      That's mass issue for forgotten weapons.

  • @hrosemd
    @hrosemd 7 років тому

    Amazing. You are greatly appreciated sir. Kudos to you.

  • @benarchyuk837
    @benarchyuk837 5 місяців тому

    One of the coolest weapons ever made into Battlefield 1

  • @richardlathrop61
    @richardlathrop61 7 років тому +1

    Seeing all these prototype rifles really shows how engineering and the ability to give a rifle to an untrained conscript really comes into play. It seems that most militaries where working with semi-automatic rifles from the 1900's forward, was it the age of the military stocks of bolt action guns that finally pushed adaption of the semi-automatic rifle?

  • @pyropussquantscalethewell-6472
    @pyropussquantscalethewell-6472 4 роки тому +2

    these bolt-action/semiauto (or sometimes full-auto) combinations are interesting, i'd like to see them applied to something like Jeff Cooper's scout rifle (assuming they're reliable enough).

    • @riza-2396
      @riza-2396 7 місяців тому +1

      China also had a bolt action/semi-auto silenced pistol, it is soooooo silent that they made it optionally bolt action so you can avoid auto loading the gun with clunky metal noises when you are near an enemy and then load the gun manually when you are safe

  • @highmolecularweightRDX
    @highmolecularweightRDX 2 роки тому

    Love how Ian says stuff like "note to anyone doing this in the future", as if someone be searching on youtube for how to take the wood off an old Chinese prototype rifle the same way I look up how to put the bolt slide back in my M500.

  • @aceroadholder2185
    @aceroadholder2185 2 роки тому

    Someone may have noted this, but the Pratt & Whitney mentioned here is not the aircraft engine company. The engine company was founded in the 1920s by engineers who had left Curtiss-Wright aircraft. The engineers built a radial engine to meet a Navy requirement. When the Navy testers looked at the engine they weren't sure who built it. They saw the Pratt & Whitney logo on the engine castings and wrote "built by Pratt & Whitney". The engineers had contracted Pratt & Whitney Manufacturing to build parts of the engine for them. They left well enough alone and Pratt & Whitney Aircraft was born.
    Pratt & Whitney Manufacturing has a long history of building machine tools. General Liu got world class machine tools for his rifle when he went to P&W. Had things worked out better, China would have had one of the best arsenals in the world in 1914.

  • @ruochenandyqin6851
    @ruochenandyqin6851 7 років тому

    Awesome channel, always learn something new!

  • @dandhan87
    @dandhan87 7 років тому +1

    Fate seems to make sure that no self loading rifles enter mass production till ww1

  • @scottrhodes6895
    @scottrhodes6895 6 років тому +1

    Hey lan, it's necessary to mention that the ship which carried the manufacturing instruments
    for General Liu rifle sunk on the way back to China, which was a huge blow for Liu. That's why he suffered stroke and never recovered. After he passed away, there was no one knew how to produce Liu's Rifle and the instruments in China were used to produce other weapons. This accident was a great loss for Chinese military industry.

  • @stoneblue1795
    @stoneblue1795 7 років тому

    Strange looking piece you brought us here. Wow. . Great review in any regard!

  • @connorjordanng8898
    @connorjordanng8898 3 роки тому +1

    Man I feel really sorry for General Liu Looks Like that bad fortune/Luck has gotten the best of both him And this weapon.

  • @kaz5707
    @kaz5707 7 років тому

    god's speed to those who could hold a cheek weld firing any rifle like that

  • @dhananjaychafale6545
    @dhananjaychafale6545 4 роки тому

    This rifle was manufactured substantially but few soldiers use it because unlocking this rifle is hard in bf1.

  • @PokemonHaloFan
    @PokemonHaloFan 4 роки тому +2

    Makes you wonder how much of a difference these would have made during the Sino-Japanese war if they had been adopted and mass produced.

  • @WardenWolf
    @WardenWolf 7 років тому +19

    Imagine what might have happened during the Japanese invasion if China had gotten this into production and all their troops had been armed with it.

    • @azh698
      @azh698 2 роки тому +3

      It had the potential to turn the situation around. It wouldn't have fixed the strategic issues though.

    • @attempt5074
      @attempt5074 2 роки тому +3

      It would be way,way harder for the japanese troops to break through, China might actually hold out fengtian against the japanese, but supply problems and desertions were a common problem on china at that time, but i think Japan would think twice before staging marco polo incident.

  • @stochinblockin
    @stochinblockin 7 років тому +1

    Nice to see you finally got to this bad boy. I remember seeing one rifle in the NRA firearm museum in Fairfax, VA. Unfortunately, the museum is too small for the collection they have, and most firearms (including this one I think) are relegated to being stacked vertically down a slim corridor with barely a name or description.

  • @lsdkjsdlkjpiosdcposdjfdjad1363
    @lsdkjsdlkjpiosdcposdjfdjad1363 7 років тому +1

    that gun is surprisingly reminiscent of an SKS. although, given the dates, perhaps the SKS is reminiscent of this rifle.

  • @thejoojoo9999
    @thejoojoo9999 7 років тому +7

    This rifle must be quite impossible to field strip. How would a soldier access the important parts if something in the mechanism broke or stopped working in battle ?

    • @ScottKenny1978
      @ScottKenny1978 4 роки тому +5

      As long as the locking block didn't fail, it turns into a straight pull bolt action and you keep fighting.

  • @QuantumCat76
    @QuantumCat76 7 років тому +8

    Ian,
    Are they letting you disassemble the guns so future owners have a nice howto disassemble/reassemble instruction video?
    I can't help but wonder... ;-)

    • @ScottKenny1978
      @ScottKenny1978 4 роки тому +1

      Probably helps to raise sale price, too.

  • @yingziyingzi4078
    @yingziyingzi4078 7 років тому +16

    The Chinese on the rifle mean land army Han yang armory manufacture

    • @yingziyingzi4078
      @yingziyingzi4078 7 років тому +3

      My last name is Liu too XD

    • @HaloFTW55
      @HaloFTW55 7 років тому

      Me too XD (ignore this username, I rather use a different identity online).

  • @thegoldencaulk2742
    @thegoldencaulk2742 7 років тому +7

    TIL you've actually made a video on this rifle before, with Bin Shih

  • @tjj300
    @tjj300 3 роки тому +1

    Being there's no proof marks it's quite possible that rifle was never even fired.

    • @A-G-F-
      @A-G-F- 3 роки тому

      Or it wasnt german lol

  • @calvingreene90
    @calvingreene90 2 роки тому

    Could be better does not mean bad. When the pin deforms the lever pushes into that solid looking socket.

  • @valandes1861
    @valandes1861 6 років тому +1

    Apart from the resignation of Liu in 1920, there were several other problems that stopped the development of this rifle.
    Firstly the steel that was used for this gun must be imported, then the bullets made in Hanyang had different quality from batch to batch, which caused the bolt to travel at different speed, resulting failure of ejection(too fast) or unable to perform a full cycle(too slow). Also the spring was a big problem as well since they were of very poor quality.
    Overall China lacked both the infrastructure and money to make this gun a standard issue

  • @jacobpettes335
    @jacobpettes335 2 роки тому

    I cant believe that tiny 1 inch push gives enough inertia to cycle the bolt all the way.

  • @yooookay9719
    @yooookay9719 2 роки тому +2

    M1903 SKS.

  • @PossumMedic
    @PossumMedic 3 роки тому

    Thank you for the vid!
    I wondered what happened when you twisted the muzzle cap!

  • @richbeast6894
    @richbeast6894 3 роки тому

    I cant describe that wood smoothnes and color 🤤

  • @2tommyrad
    @2tommyrad 7 років тому

    Exquisite machining.