Origin of the Seventh Day Adventist Reform Movement

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 25 сер 2024
  • A history lesson hosted by gospel minister and former church president Alfredo Carlos Sas.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 35

  • @user-ne5dr8yr5d
    @user-ne5dr8yr5d 5 місяців тому +1

    May God bless you brother

  • @samuelngulube9287
    @samuelngulube9287 3 роки тому +4

    This is very important to be known. It is very important to know where you are coming from, where you are, and where you are going as a believer. My God richly bless you Brother.

    • @Enockbeckbrown-hf6xx
      @Enockbeckbrown-hf6xx 8 місяців тому +1

      U cannot use the pretext of a few individuals in Germany who went against the official position of Adventists (non-combatancy) and justify your SPLINTER GROUPS! No way. The Seventh-day Adventist Church's 1800s position on conscientious is STILL intact as ever! But we ask, where in the Bible are your breakaway groups (because there are many) foretold?

  • @suzipc6228
    @suzipc6228 3 роки тому +4

    Really appreciate the lecture on history of SDARM Church. 🙏😊🌸

    • @Enockbeckbrown-hf6xx
      @Enockbeckbrown-hf6xx 8 місяців тому

      U cannot use the pretext of a few individuals in Germany who went against the official position of Adventists (non-combatancy) and justify your SPLINTER GROUPS! No way. The Seventh-day Adventist Church's 1800s position on conscientious is STILL intact as ever! But we ask, where in the Bible are your breakaway groups (because there are many) foretold?

  • @ndindiriyimanaElisa
    @ndindiriyimanaElisa 11 місяців тому

    Thanks for this message

  • @harringtonjoseph1653
    @harringtonjoseph1653 Рік тому +1

    We are proud to say sdarm our churchs in srilanka amen god bless you brother.

    • @Enockbeckbrown-hf6xx
      @Enockbeckbrown-hf6xx 8 місяців тому

      U cannot use the pretext of a few individuals in Germany who went against the official position of Adventists (non-combatancy) and justify your SPLINTER GROUPS! No way. The Seventh-day Adventist Church's 1800s position on conscientious is STILL intact as ever! But we ask, where in the Bible are your breakaway groups (because there are many) foretold?

  • @damourugiringoga8616
    @damourugiringoga8616 3 роки тому +2

    In Rwanda, we are so happy This Information of the orgin of Sdarm

    • @Enockbeckbrown-hf6xx
      @Enockbeckbrown-hf6xx 8 місяців тому

      U cannot use the pretext of a few individuals in Germany who went against the official position of Adventists (non-combatancy) and justify your SPLINTER GROUPS! No way. The Seventh-day Adventist Church's 1800s position on conscientious is STILL intact as ever! But we ask, where in the Bible are your breakaway groups (because there are many) foretold?

  • @abuyeabera3420
    @abuyeabera3420 3 роки тому +1

    We are with you thanks

  • @limbanimatola990
    @limbanimatola990 3 роки тому +1

    powerfully presented. God bless you brother.

    • @Enockbeckbrown-hf6xx
      @Enockbeckbrown-hf6xx 8 місяців тому

      U cannot use the pretext of a few individuals in Germany who went against the official position of Adventists (non-combatancy) and justify your SPLINTER GROUPS! No way. The Seventh-day Adventist Church's 1800s position on conscientious is STILL intact as ever! But we ask, where in the Bible are your breakaway groups (because there are many) foretold?

  • @niwagababrian788
    @niwagababrian788 2 роки тому +2

    Setting aside politics even over minor matters, encourage one another to obey God's law and Baer the testimony of Jesus Christ. Period. Divorce doesn't remove the problems

    • @Enockbeckbrown-hf6xx
      @Enockbeckbrown-hf6xx 8 місяців тому

      U cannot use the pretext of a few individuals in Germany who went against the official position of Adventists (non-combatancy) and justify your SPLINTER GROUPS! No way. The Seventh-day Adventist Church's 1800s position on conscientious is STILL intact as ever! But we ask, where in the Bible are your breakaway groups (because there are many) foretold?

  • @muhirwacloude6908
    @muhirwacloude6908 2 роки тому

    Ithank God becouse l see my famlly reform movement

  • @MucokellyKercie
    @MucokellyKercie Місяць тому

    Please tell me , I want to know

  • @MucokellyKercie
    @MucokellyKercie Місяць тому

    Hello ,l want to ask you if there is person ask you why you do not eat meat?you can tell him or her what by using a Bible

  • @rachelmolapo7868
    @rachelmolapo7868 Рік тому

    Amen

  • @thevoiceoflovechannel4615
    @thevoiceoflovechannel4615 2 роки тому

    Can we have the copies of those evidences?Especially the German News Papers.

    • @SDARMAustralasia
      @SDARMAustralasia  2 роки тому

      Hi, sure! please send us an email request to info at sdarm dot org dot au

  • @kufakunesurukuni7719
    @kufakunesurukuni7719 2 роки тому +1

    The SDA has judged itself

  • @edvardzv5660
    @edvardzv5660 2 роки тому

    Reading the books of the New Testament, we possibly asked ourselves more than once: *"Why 2000 years we do not see those miracles that accompanied the Сhurch of Christ in the I century, as described in the New Testament?"* Why do the so-called preachers of Christ have to prove that Jesus really existed and atheists boldly deny the historicity or divine origin of Christ? Maybe because the Сhurch of Christ has not existed for 2000 years?
    The Сhurch does not exist in the form in which it is presented in the books of the New Testament, but there are Catholic, Orthodox, Protestant and other christian sects claiming to be the place of the Church, but they not have the only thing that distinguishes the divine from the human and is characteristic of just the Сhurch of Christ -the reinforcement of the word with signs, that is, miracles (Mark 16:15-20). Therefore, some researchers doubt the historicity of Christ, and some of them are not opposed to declaring him a an ordinary philosopher, teacher. But even if Jesus were an ordinary philosopher, his disciples would be ordinary followers of Jesus. And they would not dare to write about the miracles that not only Jesus, but also his disciples, could perform. If there were the Church in our time as described by the authors of the New Testament books, where miracles are performed, the sick are healed, where prophesied, and the dead are raised, no one would doubt the historicity of Christ. Then there would be the same controversy throughout the world as in the first century - Jesus the Son of God or the false prophet who seduces the world by miracles. As a result, we can say that the emergence and development of christian sects and atheism was the result of the fact that over the 2000 years the Сhurch of Christ did not exist.
    Find *"The Mystery about the Church of Christ"* video on UA-cam, which shows the real causes of Christian sects and atheism. The video reveals a prophecy about the disappearance and reappearance of the Church of Christ before the end of the world. Watching this video will bring joy to all who sincerely seek God and will interest those who are not too lazy to think freely. Click on my name to watch the video (The video is in Russian, but English subtitles are included).

  • @namtesangma2551
    @namtesangma2551 Рік тому

    Please sir translate garo please

  • @Enockbeckbrown-hf6xx
    @Enockbeckbrown-hf6xx 8 місяців тому

    U cannot use the pretext of a few individuals in Germany who went against the official position of Adventists (non-combatancy) and justify your SPLINTER GROUPS! No way. The Seventh-day Adventist Church's 1800s position on conscientious is STILL intact as ever! But we ask, where in the Bible are your breakaway groups (because there are many) foretold?

  • @rachelmolapo7868
    @rachelmolapo7868 Рік тому

    The Sabbath was not about the Jews it was the word of God Jews is not religion race the Sabbath is for the Lord.

  • @mmtoss6530
    @mmtoss6530 Рік тому +2

    Pacifism is not biblical. There are times where war is necessary.

    • @SDARMAustralasia
      @SDARMAustralasia  Рік тому

      Thank you for your comment. The same speaker addresses this point on another channel here (old video but great content): ua-cam.com/video/i1TNfjO8u6Q/v-deo.html

  • @brianhyde5900
    @brianhyde5900 3 роки тому +1

    You are not keeping a day "holy" unless you are carrying out all the rituals prescribed by the holy ceremony for that day EXACTLY as set out in all the Law of Moses. And not least, the sabbath sacrifice.
    The patriarch of each family in each tribe was responsible for ensuring his household (including servants) kept the Sabbath. (See the wording of the 4th command in Ex 20:8 ff) The head of each family had to REMEMBER his Sabbath responsibilities -- there were so many peop le and so much preparation was involved.
    The 7th-day Sabbath belonged to the nation of Ancient Israel and so it was a HEBREW covenant ceremony.
    Notice, what was disallowed on that day was allowed (even commanded) on the other days of the week. This shows it was pure ritual, pure ceremony. It was a memorial of the creation of the 12 tribes of Israel AS A NATION under COVENANT to God, when the people were delivered from captivity in Egypt (Isa 43:1, Deut @). That's why it was a sign between God and Israel exclusively (Ex @). That's why it was commanded to be kept. Only an Israelite could keep it.
    It is IMPOSSIBLE for any of its rituals to be observed by anyone living today because nobody living today is an Ancient Israelite. Additionally there is no priestly service, no temple, no Law of Moses, to supervise its observance and punish any transgression.
    for all those reasons anyone who claims to be "keeping" the 7th day today is just plain self-deceived and is deceiving others. He is a liar because he himself is NOT observing the day as it was required to be observed under old covenant law. THAT COMMANDMENT NEVER CHANGED IN THE SLIGHTEST DETAIL ("JOT") ALL THE DAYS OF ANCIENT ISRAEL right up to AD 70.
    The Jewish Sabbath is now history. It has NOTHING to do with the lliving today. Get real!

    • @i2m99
      @i2m99 2 роки тому +6

      The Jewish Sabbath is indeed no more, but the 7th day Sabbath is still valid because it is a commemoration of the Creation Week of Genesis 1.
      The 10 Commandments, of which the 4th Commandment is about the Sabbath, are also valid as mentioned by Jesus in the Gospel and others in the rest of the New Testament.
      Only the pope says 'the Jewish Sabbath' because he is pushing for his Sunday Worship and want people to think the real Sabbath is invalid.

    • @SDARMAustralasia
      @SDARMAustralasia  Рік тому +2

      Thanks for your comment Brian. The seventh day originated at creation when God blessed it and made it holy (Genesis 2:3). He did so not for Himself, but for humanity (Exodus 20:11; Mark 2:27). A life of faith and trust leads us to rest in God's peace and joy, and the weekly day of rest (Sabbath) is a reminder of this, and forms a time when we can lay aside our regular duties and spend the day with God.

  • @niwagababrian788
    @niwagababrian788 2 роки тому

    Setting aside politics even over minor matters, encourage one another to obey God's law and Baer the testimony of Jesus Christ. Period. Divorce doesn't remove the problems