JD Unwin studied 96 societies going back 5,000 yrs, and every time women achieve eqiality the society ends - no exceptions!! The women Proffesor Fiamengo is dicussing shows us why! All fed funding needs to end immediately.
Bingo!!! It’s a closed loop.. all of the students at these Ivy League Universities could have been replaced the same day… the Universities haven’t, for the last 40+ years, haven’t admitted the best students, but the best Activists Future Leaders of the MOVEMENT… MMT, has given the Leftist an excuse to destroy the money system and create hyper inflation…
Aside from the lack of current discoveries in areas such as physics, archaeology, philology, anthropology etc. Books written in the past century and half were far more "academic" in their methodology than any work produced nowadays, with few exceptions. One can even overlook cultural standards of the time and still find that many works, despite their biases and prejudices were, on the whole, extremely well written and extensively researched.
Watched a video clip of the girl who was blessed with being able to ask the President of the United States a question.. her 2 questions.. Am I going to make the same as a man and do I have control over my own body??? The anger and attitude was off the charts.. We all know the answer to the first question… Yes, maybe even more, If you do the same job at the same company and do the same quality and effort, working the same hours.. there are laws about this.. and yes you have control over your own body.. but a baby has rights too after 3.5 months… Id suggest she get her carton emptied and not worry about kids.. with her attitude a nice man would run the other way!😂😂😂
Oh, the irony, that academic institutions, established and nurtured by religious bodies in order to foster understanding and reason, have stridently superimposed their own purposes and virtues onto these institutions. We strive to be gods of our own making.
This has been my experience of academia as well, and I spent many years in it as a grad student and then teaching. No teacher dares to contest feminism. Those who do put their careers on the line. I left academia for this reason. In fact, it started when I innocently shared a Fiamengo File video with a colleague over an email. This became known in my department when the colleague shared it and I was thus exposed as someone critical of feminism. I was from that moment on a pariah. I did not have tenure and thus no job protection. I was offered no courses to teach the following semester, despite good reviews by students, so that was that. Could I have taken legal action? Maybe, but they did it cleverly without leaving a paper trail to prove the real reason. My experience is that a gradual "dumbing down" has indeed occurred in academia. It's gradual but one can discern it. If one were to graph the rise of Leftist ideologies in academia since the 1960s and the concurrent loss of intellectual rigor among instructors, it would suggest a causal correlation. Leftism, pushed by neo-Marxist intellectuals, is itself anti-intellectual. By that I mean that it does not allow for competing ideas or genuine debate. It is dogmatic and narrows the field of thought within a narrow paradigm of politically correct discourse. It encourages the opposite of true critical thought. It could even be compared to scholasticism or the anti-intellectualism that occurred in higher ed in the USSR and Nazi Germany when all thought had to pass the purity test as ordained by the Party, e.g, "blood purity" ideology and Lysenkoism. Today DEI officers and HR personnel perform the same function in schools and corporations, administering mandatory CRT training for example. I blame not only the subject matter (e.g., gender studies), but also the Internet, which has adversely affected all of us. Fewer people read books now than before it arose, myself included. While the Internet is certainly convenient it also decreases our attention spans and can make us less focused. In grad school for the humanities, there are fewer language requirements than there used to be. One can get a doctorate, even at a good university, without learning much about anything else, which is the problem of specialization. I would almost venture that someone with an Honours BA from 100 years ago would in some respects be better educated than a PhD student now, at least in the humanities. They would have studied Latin and Greek and be able to write proper English sentences. Of course, education was restricted to fewer people then. As it has been democratized, the standards have lowered. Today with multiculturalism, being able to read and write English is increasingly not considered important in universities in the Anglosphere. I have met PhD students from other countries whose English is terrible. I have read grad school theses that are practically unintelligible, suffering from poor grammar and an excess of jargon. Today, students are being admitted to universities who are semi-illiterate, but there is pressure from the department to pass them, despite this; this is the problem of grade inflation. DEI plays a part in this, elevating unqualified people, both students and professors. In addition, ideological bias for Leftism in hiring has weeded out conservative profs, reducing the spectrum of perspectives. Then there is what has been termed the rise and rule of the midwits, or people with middle-of-the-road IQs. They are now in charge of all our major institutions. The best and brightest have not risen to the top, certainly not in academia. I have also seen intelligent students who were not given the theoretical tools they needed to articulate their thoughts well; for example, a boy struggling to express ideas that moral philosophy has addressed but doing so through the more limited framework of Marxist theories. Going back in time I wish I had said this to him and directed him to studies better suited to the thoughts he wanted to express. See the article "Behind Declining Standards in Higher Ed" by Mark Horowitz, Anthony L. Haynor and Kenneth Kickham. They did a survey of profs who said that grades were being inflated in recent years.
Democratizing certain institutions has only led to disaster. Education, the military, and dare I say, the government, becoming more and more democratized has created a leveling effect that has removed greatness from those institutions that should cultivate the most. These institutions should re-aristocratized, in the best possible sense of the term. Meaning, in the classical sense, the rule of the best. Better known as meritocracy nowadays. Universities should be only available to the top percentage of all students, graded on an objective, merit-based scale. Community colleges, trade schools etc. Will be made available to all others as alternatives. But again, on a merit based scale. Those who were brought up under the classical educational model would be flabbergasted by the sheer stupidity of the average student and the surprising vapidness of even the teachers and professors. Public education has honestly done more harm than good.
@@Fact-fiend_1000ASMR. I agree. That should happen. In terms of public education doing more harm than good, this has especially been the case over the last 50 years in the West because education was increasingly appropriated for a Leftist political agenda. Gramsci's "slow march through the institutions" began with higher education: the growth of feminism, neo-Marxist historical revisionism, critical race theory, etc. It then filtered into public education through the influence of teachers steeped in this new direction for education. After three generations, it became the norm: secular Leftist values and worldviews have successfully usurped centuries of a worldview that shaped the West: Judeo-Christian and European Enlightenment ideals. Yuri Bezmenov, the KGB defector, spelled out the agenda of ideological subversion, the first stage of which is to use the education system to indoctrinate. The stages are: 1) Demoralization. For this step in the process, 15 - 20 years are needed. That is the amount of time required to educate a generation. Helping along the way are media and teachers who have become sympathetic (consciously or unconsciously) to the theoretical causes of the subverting nation. Bezmenov claims that the USSR was surprised at how easy this phase was in the US. 2) Destabilization. Following the earlier phase, this is a two to five-year period to change the target country’s foreign relations, defense, and economy. 3) Crisis. Perhaps six weeks of chaos as a climatic turning point. 4) Normalization. This stage changes the appreciation of what the status quo looks like. Bezmenov’s description of this phase also includes military takeover. It took longer than the KGB model but the model has unfolded as planned. The Covid crisis of 2020-22 and race riots of 2020 were definitely planned crises, examples of stage 2, destabilization. The UK just went through stage 3: crisis and the government there is striving for stage 4: normalization, meaning state tyranny. Expect the same across the Western world in coming years. A conspiracy theory? Yes, but in this case unfortunately it is real, not imagined.
I think it is the other way around. The left has been taken over by the women and they just follow their natural instincts, treating everything like a family. Women look down to the children, men look up to competition.
I came back to Vancouver Canada at the age of 30 after spending a decade travelling the world… I thought I would be an excellent social studies teacher given my experience and background and interest… I began my courses and realized within a couple weeks that back here in Canada They were perceiving the world through which I had travelled through a particular lens… I spent an entire day in the education library, going over the curriculum for all high school grades, and I left that evening, realizing I could not fulfil my dream of becoming a teacher. The next day, I left the University. It was sad not just for me, but for all my potential students. At least potentially. The radicalization of the curriculum somehow reminded me of my travels through what was in the communist, eastern European countries. It sent to chill up my spine.
Glad I'm getting old, unfortunately I may be around for another 20 yrs, it's frightening to even imagine what life will be like with these people having the reins of power
1:20 “Do not use business sources”. What? Whether pay gap or glass ceiling, where did this professor think the data should come from? And why are they researching what is actually a question for economics, and which requires expertise in both economics and statistics? The whole topic is outside their wheelhouse of expertise. They only care because they believe in “equality of outcome” and want to prove gender “inequity” based on outcomes. That’s why all feminist-led studies of these topics avoid multi factor analysis to account for things like job roles, tenure, education, experience, hours worked, regular shifts, accommodation for childcare, avoidance of nighttime and weekend work, avoidance of jobs that are less safe or more physically demanding, or which require lengthy periods away from home, etc. On the pay gap, feminists usually cite things like “annual earnings” and avoid metrics like “hourly wage” - which in most union environments is fixed and gender neutral. This is just one example of what feminist researchers call the “feminist lens” - a type of polarized lens that lets the wearer see all the disadvantages that women have while blocking all the advantages, and does the opposite for disadvantages and advantages which men have.
Thank you Professor FIAMENGO
JD Unwin studied 96 societies going back 5,000 yrs, and every time women achieve eqiality the society ends - no exceptions!!
The women Proffesor Fiamengo is dicussing shows us why!
All fed funding needs to end immediately.
they are not getting dumber. they are hired specifically for that trait
They go out of their way everyday to prove that Islam is right about women.
Bingo!!! It’s a closed loop.. all of the students at these Ivy League Universities could have been replaced the same day… the Universities haven’t, for the last 40+ years, haven’t admitted the best students, but the best Activists Future Leaders of the MOVEMENT… MMT, has given the Leftist an excuse to destroy the money system and create hyper inflation…
the glass ceiling aka IQ
It's the Inquisition all over again.
No one shows the rise of women in education,(80%). And the drop in education outcomes. Pathetic.
"We have the guilty perpetrator. Now let's find the crime and the evidence. We can get witnesses from the national writers club."
"Without a shred of evidence asked for or given."
Thomas sowell.
Thank you Professor Fiamengo and the answer is YES.
“The reason why…is…because…”
Aside from the lack of current discoveries in areas such as physics, archaeology, philology, anthropology etc. Books written in the past century and half were far more "academic" in their methodology than any work produced nowadays, with few exceptions. One can even overlook cultural standards of the time and still find that many works, despite their biases and prejudices were, on the whole, extremely well written and extensively researched.
And the pay gap has been debunked for decades
It's like forbidden knowledge
Women are not interested in the truth.
It's "like really scary."
Watched a video clip of the girl who was blessed with being able to ask the President of the United States a question.. her 2 questions.. Am I going to make the same as a man and do I have control over my own body??? The anger and attitude was off the charts.. We all know the answer to the first question… Yes, maybe even more, If you do the same job at the same company and do the same quality and effort, working the same hours.. there are laws about this.. and yes you have control over your own body.. but a baby has rights too after 3.5 months… Id suggest she get her carton emptied and not worry about kids.. with her attitude a nice man would run the other way!😂😂😂
@@artmosley3337 She certainly has more rights than men? Was the president Obama?
Oh, the irony, that academic institutions, established and nurtured by religious bodies in order to foster understanding and reason, have stridently superimposed their own purposes and virtues onto these institutions. We strive to be gods of our own making.
Safe space infantilism: a perfect description. Your voice is one in a 10 million!
It’s good to refresh these old files; they help us study where and how far we’ve degenerated.
This has been my experience of academia as well, and I spent many years in it as a grad student and then teaching. No teacher dares to contest feminism. Those who do put their careers on the line. I left academia for this reason. In fact, it started when I innocently shared a Fiamengo File video with a colleague over an email. This became known in my department when the colleague shared it and I was thus exposed as someone critical of feminism. I was from that moment on a pariah. I did not have tenure and thus no job protection. I was offered no courses to teach the following semester, despite good reviews by students, so that was that. Could I have taken legal action? Maybe, but they did it cleverly without leaving a paper trail to prove the real reason.
My experience is that a gradual "dumbing down" has indeed occurred in academia. It's gradual but one can discern it. If one were to graph the rise of Leftist ideologies in academia since the 1960s and the concurrent loss of intellectual rigor among instructors, it would suggest a causal correlation. Leftism, pushed by neo-Marxist intellectuals, is itself anti-intellectual. By that I mean that it does not allow for competing ideas or genuine debate. It is dogmatic and narrows the field of thought within a narrow paradigm of politically correct discourse. It encourages the opposite of true critical thought. It could even be compared to scholasticism or the anti-intellectualism that occurred in higher ed in the USSR and Nazi Germany when all thought had to pass the purity test as ordained by the Party, e.g, "blood purity" ideology and Lysenkoism. Today DEI officers and HR personnel perform the same function in schools and corporations, administering mandatory CRT training for example.
I blame not only the subject matter (e.g., gender studies), but also the Internet, which has adversely affected all of us. Fewer people read books now than before it arose, myself included. While the Internet is certainly convenient it also decreases our attention spans and can make us less focused.
In grad school for the humanities, there are fewer language requirements than there used to be. One can get a doctorate, even at a good university, without learning much about anything else, which is the problem of specialization. I would almost venture that someone with an Honours BA from 100 years ago would in some respects be better educated than a PhD student now, at least in the humanities. They would have studied Latin and Greek and be able to write proper English sentences. Of course, education was restricted to fewer people then. As it has been democratized, the standards have lowered.
Today with multiculturalism, being able to read and write English is increasingly not considered important in universities in the Anglosphere. I have met PhD students from other countries whose English is terrible. I have read grad school theses that are practically unintelligible, suffering from poor grammar and an excess of jargon.
Today, students are being admitted to universities who are semi-illiterate, but there is pressure from the department to pass them, despite this; this is the problem of grade inflation. DEI plays a part in this, elevating unqualified people, both students and professors. In addition, ideological bias for Leftism in hiring has weeded out conservative profs, reducing the spectrum of perspectives. Then there is what has been termed the rise and rule of the midwits, or people with middle-of-the-road IQs. They are now in charge of all our major institutions. The best and brightest have not risen to the top, certainly not in academia.
I have also seen intelligent students who were not given the theoretical tools they needed to articulate their thoughts well; for example, a boy struggling to express ideas that moral philosophy has addressed but doing so through the more limited framework of Marxist theories. Going back in time I wish I had said this to him and directed him to studies better suited to the thoughts he wanted to express.
See the article "Behind Declining Standards in Higher Ed" by Mark Horowitz, Anthony L. Haynor and Kenneth Kickham. They did a survey of profs who said that grades were being inflated in recent years.
Democratizing certain institutions has only led to disaster. Education, the military, and dare I say, the government, becoming more and more democratized has created a leveling effect that has removed greatness from those institutions that should cultivate the most. These institutions should re-aristocratized, in the best possible sense of the term. Meaning, in the classical sense, the rule of the best. Better known as meritocracy nowadays. Universities should be only available to the top percentage of all students, graded on an objective, merit-based scale. Community colleges, trade schools etc. Will be made available to all others as alternatives. But again, on a merit based scale. Those who were brought up under the classical educational model would be flabbergasted by the sheer stupidity of the average student and the surprising vapidness of even the teachers and professors. Public education has honestly done more harm than good.
@@Fact-fiend_1000ASMR. I agree. That should happen. In terms of public education doing more harm than good, this has especially been the case over the last 50 years in the West because education was increasingly appropriated for a Leftist political agenda. Gramsci's "slow march through the institutions" began with higher education: the growth of feminism, neo-Marxist historical revisionism, critical race theory, etc. It then filtered into public education through the influence of teachers steeped in this new direction for education. After three generations, it became the norm: secular Leftist values and worldviews have successfully usurped centuries of a worldview that shaped the West: Judeo-Christian and European Enlightenment ideals.
Yuri Bezmenov, the KGB defector, spelled out the agenda of ideological subversion, the first stage of which is to use the education system to indoctrinate. The stages are:
1) Demoralization. For this step in the process, 15 - 20 years are needed. That is the amount of time required to educate a generation. Helping along the way are media and teachers who have become sympathetic (consciously or unconsciously) to the theoretical causes of the subverting nation. Bezmenov claims that the USSR was surprised at how easy this phase was in the US.
2) Destabilization. Following the earlier phase, this is a two to five-year period to change the target country’s foreign relations, defense, and economy.
3) Crisis. Perhaps six weeks of chaos as a climatic turning point.
4) Normalization. This stage changes the appreciation of what the status quo looks like. Bezmenov’s description of this phase also includes military takeover.
It took longer than the KGB model but the model has unfolded as planned. The Covid crisis of 2020-22 and race riots of 2020 were definitely planned crises, examples of stage 2, destabilization. The UK just went through stage 3: crisis and the government there is striving for stage 4: normalization, meaning state tyranny. Expect the same across the Western world in coming years. A conspiracy theory? Yes, but in this case unfortunately it is real, not imagined.
I think it is the other way around. The left has been taken over by the women and they just follow their natural instincts, treating everything like a family. Women look down to the children, men look up to competition.
"Let's name him Scary"
It's like living in an open air insane asylum these days.
PhD? Remember how Bill Murray had PhD’s in multiple disciplines 😊
this is actually very reassuring. Its worrying when you disagree fundamentally with very intelligent people.
Good content. Thank you.
I came back to Vancouver Canada at the age of 30 after spending a decade travelling the world… I thought I would be an excellent social studies teacher given my experience and background and interest… I began my courses and realized within a couple weeks that back here in Canada They were perceiving the world through which I had travelled through a particular lens… I spent an entire day in the education library, going over the curriculum for all high school grades, and I left that evening, realizing I could not fulfil my dream of becoming a teacher. The next day, I left the University. It was sad not just for me, but for all my potential students. At least potentially. The radicalization of the curriculum somehow reminded me of my travels through what was in the communist, eastern European countries. It sent to chill up my spine.
Great episode ‼️
Infantilation as well
babe quick, a new Fiamengo File video dropped
I have given up on my once-loved CBC. mediocrity in the corporation.
The double spaces after period bothers me the most.
Glad I'm getting old, unfortunately I may be around for another 20 yrs, it's frightening to even imagine what life will be like with these people having the reins of power
How much "research" is repeatable.
Wow, almost feel sorry for Prof. Sullivan.😂
MIDTOWN SACRAMENTO SALUTES JANICE. As the lone conservative here in midtown
IM LIKE a bleeding pig in a piranha pond.
OMG. That email. Idiocracy.
150k 🤦♂️
I work in electrical utility construction and yhe wage gap is real. Women make far less , because there are no women in utilities construction 😂
1:20 “Do not use business sources”. What? Whether pay gap or glass ceiling, where did this professor think the data should come from? And why are they researching what is actually a question for economics, and which requires expertise in both economics and statistics?
The whole topic is outside their wheelhouse of expertise. They only care because they believe in “equality of outcome” and want to prove gender “inequity” based on outcomes. That’s why all feminist-led studies of these topics avoid multi factor analysis to account for things like job roles, tenure, education, experience, hours worked, regular shifts, accommodation for childcare, avoidance of nighttime and weekend work, avoidance of jobs that are less safe or more physically demanding, or which require lengthy periods away from home, etc.
On the pay gap, feminists usually cite things like “annual earnings” and avoid metrics like “hourly wage” - which in most union environments is fixed and gender neutral. This is just one example of what feminist researchers call the “feminist lens” - a type of polarized lens that lets the wearer see all the disadvantages that women have while blocking all the advantages, and does the opposite for disadvantages and advantages which men have.
“feminist research”
Spot the oxymoron?
Lol DEI at its best.
I miss the old Fiamingo File. I need to see someone talk to really absorb the content
Yeah, I think she's pretty, too.
Comment
tenth
"Without a shred of evidence asked for or given."
Thomas sowell.