@TeamCOG_YGO makes a lot of sense, round table not doing anything by itself can feel awful this format, i'm personally gonna try it and see how it feels, because i personally feel its worth testing again, but it'll probably turn out as a win more brick engine lol.
Side note, I don't know how you feel on this, but I remember the words that French boyo said in his profile on your channel, "I'm not trying to always build the unbreakable board, I'm just trying to build the best board I can" and that really stuck with me because it's something I know a lot of combo players don't understand, there's more too it than dropping the unbreakable board on cool down when it comes to playing, AND deck building.
@ absolutely and I agree with that French man! That’s why I’m not a fan of the azamina deck list, I try and build a board that can play through multiple points of interactions and board breakers not try to always build an unstoppable board. Sometimes Charles alone with Oliver equipped is enough to keep some opening hands at bay!
@@TeamCOG_YGO that reminds me of something a lot of good Centur-Ion players say about Blazar. Charlamange has 4000 attack, gearfried has 3500, they're not dying in battle, sometimes it's not about negating your opponents cards, you can honestly save your negates for when your opponent is threatening to actually remove your monsters, because you're not dying by battle with the absolutely monstrous attack stats of those two.
Opening beckoned all the time killed it for me, arguably the xyz package is the same, you don’t want to see the trap/beckoned and it was okay seeing the equip/succession, only difference was that if you saw beckoned you really couldn’t do the ib lines unless you opened particular hands, and if you see the trap you have a different line that uses it. I think he does! But I also think he’s taking a current break from the format!
Me and my testing group have and we aren’t fans of it. Gives a false pretense of a “one” card combo. Plays soft and hard bricks. Doesn’t mean it’s not good but just not my cup of tea!
@ I have multiple issues with it, You play the same amount of ways without playing the azamina to get to oss, those number haven’t really changed but what did change was you’re adding in hallowed+deception that are bricks and as much as I like brandamante it’s another brick, brandamante the lesser out of the three, you play less starters since you have to make room for getting getting witch more consistent. BUT if you enjoy it play the hell out of it happy it works for you!
Great upload, great commentary! Thanks man
Hi! At 11:12 u cant equip the ring from your deck, only from your hand or gy
Yes, you’re right the action looks like I’m equipping from deck but it was resolving Roland so we were skipping the steps
@TeamCOG_YGO oh excuse me! I've been watching yout videos for a while, the're the reason im going to build infernoble deck
Yo, thoughts on Camelot + round table to make angel ring part of every combo?
I’ve always liked Camelot but didn’t like
The brick of the round table.
@TeamCOG_YGO makes a lot of sense, round table not doing anything by itself can feel awful this format, i'm personally gonna try it and see how it feels, because i personally feel its worth testing again, but it'll probably turn out as a win more brick engine lol.
Side note, I don't know how you feel on this, but I remember the words that French boyo said in his profile on your channel, "I'm not trying to always build the unbreakable board, I'm just trying to build the best board I can" and that really stuck with me because it's something I know a lot of combo players don't understand, there's more too it than dropping the unbreakable board on cool down when it comes to playing, AND deck building.
@ absolutely and I agree with that French man! That’s why I’m not a fan of the azamina deck list, I try and build a board that can play through multiple points of interactions and board breakers not try to always build an unstoppable board. Sometimes Charles alone with Oliver equipped is enough to keep some opening hands at bay!
@@TeamCOG_YGO that reminds me of something a lot of good Centur-Ion players say about Blazar. Charlamange has 4000 attack, gearfried has 3500, they're not dying in battle, sometimes it's not about negating your opponents cards, you can honestly save your negates for when your opponent is threatening to actually remove your monsters, because you're not dying by battle with the absolutely monstrous attack stats of those two.
What happened to the ib lines? Why did you cut it? Also does rudy have a channel?
Opening beckoned all the time killed it for me, arguably the xyz package is the same, you don’t want to see the trap/beckoned and it was okay seeing the equip/succession, only difference was that if you saw beckoned you really couldn’t do the ib lines unless you opened particular hands, and if you see the trap you have a different line that uses it. I think he does! But I also think he’s taking a current break from the format!
@@TeamCOG_YGO name of the channel?
youtube.com/@scarvanguard1770?si=jJ0qf7Yj0jdj7PkS
Thx@@TeamCOG_YGO
Have you thought about trying to play azamina infernoble
Me and my testing group have and we aren’t fans of it. Gives a false pretense of a “one” card combo. Plays soft and hard bricks. Doesn’t mean it’s not good but just not my cup of tea!
@@TeamCOG_YGO I personally love it! I really like the more consistent way to get to oss. And plus I get run bradamante
@ I have multiple issues with it, You play the same amount of ways without playing the azamina to get to oss, those number haven’t really changed but what did change was you’re adding in hallowed+deception that are bricks and as much as I like brandamante it’s another brick, brandamante the lesser out of the three, you play less starters since you have to make room for getting getting witch more consistent. BUT if you enjoy it play the hell out of it happy it works for you!
@ do you run Dominus impulse?
@@Charityyy01 yes cards to insane but also as a crossout target, impulse on Angelica is gg!