Forensic DNA Mixups | Greg Hampikian | TEDxBoise

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 17 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 28

  • @k3books605
    @k3books605 9 років тому +1

    Great video... Greg has commented on the erroneous DNA findings in the Amanda Knox case and in Europe Prof Peter Gill in the UK has written a book on the same issues. Well done TED talks ...these are important issues.

    • @corpusvile1
      @corpusvile1 9 років тому

      Lol still with your tongue up Dr shill's arse K3?

    • @imateapot51
      @imateapot51 9 років тому

      corpus vile Are you an extremely ugly girl or a really stupid brainless guy?

    • @corpusvile1
      @corpusvile1 9 років тому

      imateapot51 Neither.

    • @imateapot51
      @imateapot51 9 років тому

      corpus vile Okay I will keep guessing.

  • @victorlota9501
    @victorlota9501 4 роки тому +1

    can someone resume of what are the two errors??,

    • @sinu5823
      @sinu5823 4 роки тому +1

      Interpretive error and contamination error

    • @Pj-zj6uw
      @Pj-zj6uw 3 роки тому

      BAKKKKKAAAAAA
      BAKA

  • @raybrown4681
    @raybrown4681 3 роки тому

    I need him on my case,

  • @veronicapalodichuk7324
    @veronicapalodichuk7324 4 роки тому +2

    Unfortunately the mass public is ignored of how fallible and subjective dna is. Not to mention bias and they are paid for convictions

  • @scythe4337
    @scythe4337 8 років тому

    This was in Boise? Uhhhh, I could have gone.

  • @maisondusuave
    @maisondusuave 9 років тому +1

    Hampikian is the ultimate tool.

    • @corpusvile1
      @corpusvile1 9 років тому

      He went river rafting with Knox. Then got divorced very soon after.

    • @imateapot51
      @imateapot51 9 років тому

      maisondusuave No you are loser. What time do you get off work at Burger King today?

    • @corpusvile1
      @corpusvile1 9 років тому

      imateapot51 Greg, is that you? :)

    • @maisondusuave
      @maisondusuave 9 років тому

      lol

    • @imateapot51
      @imateapot51 9 років тому +1

      corpus vile No, but i find it very insulting that you would attack a presentation that has nothing to do with Amanda. You are simply attacking anything he does because you do not like that he supports Amanda. Especially since he is not like myself, a person with an opinion. He is a forensics expert. Something the guilters do not have.