U got it wrong, they aren't patent for color, they trademark (TM) U still can use it, but not in same category. Ie. U can make a insolation in Tiffany teal. But u can't make shoes with red insoles
Trademarks can only be filed for non-generic IPs. Many colours have specific RGB codes, hence they can be trademarked. Colours like black are common, so they cannot be.
Just in case people don’t realise this doesn’t mean you can’t use the colour in any context, brands will most likely have specific trademarks. Like you can’t use macdonald’s red for a fast food logo ect.
Well not only does it have to be in the same market but it also has to be that specific color. Like Shartuse magenta mango orange or some crap like that. You can't copyright a generic color.
@@noticedruid4985 yes, u can. RED - Coca cola, lebuttone But they very limited. U still can get red shoes from other is brands but u don't get red insoles.
So idk if it anything like with power tool companies. but specific colors and combinations are trademarked to stop companies from trying to confuse consumers into buying the wrong brand. Like dewalts black and yellow or milwaukees red, white. And black
Yes, color combination are trademarked. But i still can make a Milwaukee red-black dildo. Trademark are only registered for category. IRC most broad category is Toys
This guy could do a winter weather report: High winds, two feet of snow and ice with temps around ten degrees Fahrenheit….and I’d be in a good mood! Great accent!!!!
Whats really funny about this is that in the uk lots of people look down on the scouse accent. Lovely to see that its appreciated overseas though. My mum is scouse.
Not really. This is a different part of actual Scouseland I suspect - bc Lennon's accent is/was a little different. (Maybe none English types can't tell, I don't know🤗💜🙏🇬🇧)
@@ysbrandd from what I heard its to stop competitors from trying to copy them and steal their sales. It's only trademarked in their specific field. It kind of makes sense because we do associate specific colors to specific brands. The was a case a while back where a very successful company had used brown as their color and a competitor came in with that exact same color, which ended up fooling alot of people into thinking it was the original company. This caused a massive decrease in sales for the original company.
Most of these companies have only trademarked these colors if another company is in the same field. Like a fast food chain can probably use these luxury colors since they are not in competition with them.
I was thinking the same.. they will lose the case in court.. even if they trademark it they will lose because colors don’t belong to them. But a pattern can be another debate
U can trademark colour, Mattel pink in kids toy's. T-Mobile magenta in cellular service, UPS in hauling and package transport. Cadbury wanna broader category, that's why registration flopped
I own a pot of laboutin sole paint 10 years back, still fresh and usable. They also sell stickable red rubber soles to stick over the paint to give the shoe more purchase and grip. Unfortunately i can only wear heals to dance in and no fancy shoes to walk for a night out just worth the Knowledge for anyone wishing to purchase a pair or upcycle a collectible.
Fashion brands are less likely to have trademarked colours as fashion is based on trend cycles. Whereas for the other companies mentioned, their trademarks strongly connect to their branding. If they did not use their colour, they would not be recognisable. Also offers protection from copy cat competitors within their own industry.
I think it's important to point out that these are very specificly defined colors. You can use red for instance, just not the exact (or too close to the exact) shade of Coca-cola. It's not red in general. There has to be a specific and narrow definition for a trade mark to be placed.
@@danhumungous9887 they only really have ownership of the colour in there respective field. It keeps people from making products that are basically copying them that could trick people. Just because coke has rights over red it doesn’t really mean that no other drink company can use red. They just can’t use the exact same red in a significant way
The color trademark is not for a plain color but the color combination. It is a thing in the us with American companies, louboutin actually lost a lawsuit in Europe against YSL for the use of red soles. However the color trademark in the US is only for same industry. For example I can start a fashion house and have my logos and colors to be the ups brown yellow combo start a parcels company and use the red and white Coca Cola colors but I can’t have a parcels business with the brown yellow UPS colors and can’t have a soft drink with red and white colors because they are recognizable in their respective industries by their colors. Since the color plays a role in brand recognition, a competitor no matter how small cannot use their colors.
There's a lot more to it than just using the color. You have to be gaining a profit of sorts and marketing predominantly off of that color and it also depends on what you're selling. If you're selling bags, don't use a bag company color, etc.
The color has to be very specific and used in a specific way. Louboutin's have a Shiny Red bottom and a contrasting top. So anyone can make an all over shiny red shoe.. But only Louboutin can do a matte red top with a shiny red bottom. You have to establish brand recognition and that confusion will arise if another brand does the same colors or iconography.
A heap of companies in australia were in a legal standoff with Cadbury over the colour purple in general, for anything chocolate based. This was back in the 00's. I worked for one of the companies. Sadly Cadbury got their way. So not always one trademarked shade.
@@T3MUwU Nope, u can't use it in same category. U can't make a barbie clone and use Mattel pink. But u can open a beauty saloon and make logo in Mattel pink
You dont get sued for using a colour, it's not enforceable. Not currently. Sueing is only on the cards if you're trying to mimic the product incl ith their colour, and even then they have to prove you are.
Some have tried but color they wanted to trade mark was far to generic to actually trademark or their request to trademark a specific color was so broad/over reaching that they denied it. If they come up with and named a color after them, and then trademarked/patented that, I can see it but I dont think they can simply sue you for using a shade of a color unless its the specific one that they trade marked. No one can "own" a color as a whole, maybe a specific shade but a company can't just own "Purple" it has to be a subset of said color that is unique identifiable because if it is one that is too frequently used or too broad they can't obtain it. Its just a way for people to get the express ticket to greed and fortune, its rather disgusting and depressing.
“In order for a color to be marked, it requires that there be proof of a “secondary meaning.” This means that a color can only be trademarked in connection with a good or service if, through the use of the color over time, the public has come to associate that color with a particular brand” So no is the answer, you can’t just get sued unless you start a similar brand with their colors.
“Secondary meaning can be extremely difficult to prove, unless the color or color combination is not widely used for other goods and services, is unusual, or is elaborate. One of the best ways to demonstrate this is by providing a high volume of advertising in which the color mark has been used.” So they will probably not even sue you because it’s too much effort to prove.
They on is in specific segments, u made is sound general as if they owned that colour but that's not the case, for coke they own that share of red but only for drinks, if u used it for a shoes brand logo they can do anything same goes for the rest.
It's only ever in the context of the product. Ie. Coke being red and pepsi being blue. So other companies can't pretend to be that companies product and steal sales from people who don't pay attention.
So you only get a trademark if your brand is recognised by the general public, Tiffany blue was already known but it’s not the colour, it’s the likeness to the colour and brand, no one will recognise the orange or grey, Also big company’s could only do this because it’s not really possible to trade mark a colour you can’t own colour, you can trade mark the likeness to that colour, “it’s more like Tiffany blue” or Louie red “ that’s trademark
It’s important to know that these trademarks usually only apply to competing products, and only specific shades. Like target has a trademark on their specific shade of red, meaning Walmart can’t use that red color in their branding or products, as an example. And that usually applies to similar red shades. It’s why Coke and target can’t and don’t sue each other for both using bright, high saturation red colors in their branding, or staples and target, or Walmart and Facebook, twitter, or any of the myriad internet and tech companies using blue. You also typically can’t file for a trademark if everyone in the industry commonly uses that color or a similar one (internet/ tech companies all using various blues, for example). Trademark and copyright laws are fucking complicated and often a nightmare to navigate. And that’s why these corporate lawyers make fucking _baaaaank._ Shit like this gets hyper specialized.
You can not trademark black or white as there are no shades of those colors. T-mobile has trademarked their magenta pink and won some lawsuits about stealing "their" color.
It's funny how people in comment sections always seem to be taking things out of context and are severely uneducated in the field. To clarify, no they do not "own" that color, you can still use red, you can still use purple etc. They just own the color in their specific field. For example, Tiffany and Co. owns the shade "Tiffany Blue", but only in jewelry boxes. Coca Cola also only owns that specific shade of red in softdrinks/pop cans. They do this to prevent people copying their brand and making fakes. And no, you will likely not get sued if you use a trademarked color for that product too. Them trademarking those colors are largely for INFRINGEMENT SCHEMES.
This is a very normal thing. As you have classifications for services and goods with the registration at EUIPO (European Intellectual Property Office) So for example for Christian Louboutians, there are no other shoe designer who can make heels and use a similiar color red under the sole. Read similiar as the judge looks at "confusion for the normal public" Anyway ty ty
And you cannot just simply trademark a colour, there are over 1,867 solid pantone colours; if brands all claim a colour, we’ll eventually run out. You can only trademark colours within a design, like Louboutins red under heals.
There are caveats to the trademarking of a color, typically if the color is too broad or basic it can't be trademarked, you can't really be sued for using the color but let's say if you made a candy just like resses and used that shade of orange for your candy then yeah you'd probably get sued. It's so a brand is recognizable in their industry by that color specifically
They don't completely own their colour. Although I can't make a fizzy drink with coca cola red, I can make anything else with that colour, and you can't trade mark colours which are functional, so colours that are used for an actual purpose. That means you can't, for example make hi viz jackets and trade mark the bright yellow, because it has the function of making the wearer visible
I'm not sure you CAN trademark black. Don't have source off the top of my head but you need a specific shade usually, black is just not unique enough to allow one brand to stop everyone else in the particular industry from using it.
To register a colour trademark, you are required to have a unique colour that is not on the Pantone colour scale, for example, Cadbury's Purple. The colours used in the brands mentioned are not unique or distinctive enough to be successfully registered as trademarks.
Louboutin have trademark for RED yes, but we talk only about insoles. Barbie Pink is also ™, in category toys. Panther Isolation pink is also trademark, but only in isolation materials. T-Mobile magenta, trademark in cellular service.
I mean you can use the color just not to sell a product in the same space. Like if I was selling chocolate in a box the UPS brown they could attempt to sue but I doubt it would hold up in court.
Working in the printing industry. That is a common thing. Some brands need there color printed exclusively that color. There are Pantone that are only used for there branding
LV, Tiffany and Hermes don’t need to waste their money trademarking those colors because guess what.. the marketing association with those colors with their brands is powerful enough. When you look at that shade of aqua/orange colors you already associate them with luxury because of LV, Hermes and Tiffany & Co.
To legally trademark a color you need to prove thst your brand is strongly associated with that colour and that product only. Do Cadbury has trademarked *purple chocolate wrapper* not purple as a whole
I could be wrong here but I thought some NFL teams trademark some colors I don't know if it has to do with anything like that but when you buy stuff at the store it is the team colors
They can have trademarks for color combination, but they are very limited. If u are team u trademark logo's, slogans (IRC Liverpool FC have trademark for "u will never walk alone".
I thought you could only trademark a colour if it was combined with something. Like the red colour base of high heels is a trademark. But the colour itself isn’t. So I could use that same colour red as a colour for my car, just not with the base of high heels.
Trademarking color is stupid tbh especially if the colors are not even unique. These brand who trademarked their color did not even have unique color at all. It is ridiculous.
I like this guy... The way he said purple *paiple*
Is amazing
Just because of you i said “paiple” like 10 times
It's because he's scouse, from Liverpool, UK.
@@saturatedodin476 lmfao
@@Lilferiby damn i thought he was aussie
@@siliconnachos xenophobic af
you forgot vans owning the checkerboard pattern
I didn’t know this one, that’s cool!
Certain checkerboards and cheese board making company's have to give a percentage for using there "checkerboard color"
U got it wrong, they aren't patent for color, they trademark (TM)
U still can use it, but not in same category.
Ie. U can make a insolation in Tiffany teal.
But u can't make shoes with red insoles
@@mateuszzimon8216 nobody in the video or the comment section said anything about patents
But why tho... Why trademark that ... It's just a pattern.
Trademarking doesn’t mean they can sue you for using a colour, it means it can be part of a larger case of brand infringement.
Trademarks can only be filed for non-generic IPs.
Many colours have specific RGB codes, hence they can be trademarked. Colours like black are common, so they cannot be.
Red is also generic, but they are trademarked in only this industry.
Lebuttone have trademark for red insoles.
Just in case people don’t realise this doesn’t mean you can’t use the colour in any context, brands will most likely have specific trademarks. Like you can’t use macdonald’s red for a fast food logo ect.
Yeah but clarify that it applies mostly against products or brands operating in the same markets
Well not only does it have to be in the same market but it also has to be that specific color.
Like Shartuse magenta mango orange or some crap like that.
You can't copyright a generic color.
@@noticedruid4985 yes, u can.
RED - Coca cola, lebuttone
But they very limited. U still can get red shoes from other is brands but u don't get red insoles.
Thanks for the clarification
So idk if it anything like with power tool companies. but specific colors and combinations are trademarked to stop companies from trying to confuse consumers into buying the wrong brand. Like dewalts black and yellow or milwaukees red, white. And black
Yes, color combination are trademarked. But i still can make a Milwaukee red-black dildo.
Trademark are only registered for category.
IRC most broad category is Toys
Out of all the accents in the UK, Scouse is the best.
I could listen to this man talk all day 💜
This guy could do a winter weather report: High winds, two feet of snow and ice with temps around ten degrees Fahrenheit….and I’d be in a good mood! Great accent!!!!
Whats really funny about this is that in the uk lots of people look down on the scouse accent. Lovely to see that its appreciated overseas though. My mum is scouse.
It's like John Lennon talking about luxury brands. Love it.
Not really. This is a different part of actual Scouseland I suspect - bc Lennon's accent is/was a little different. (Maybe none English types can't tell, I don't know🤗💜🙏🇬🇧)
Ikr! I don’t know if this guy is Liverpudlian or not but he sounds like it!
@@YourEveryPicture7 it's not spot on but some of the inflections resonate. Tell me about the different accents of England though! 🤗✌💚
I have a Tiffany Blue 9mm, I love it!
I like the way you said yeah and no... Lol
Just to simplify it u can only trademark a color if the public has associated it with a well know brand which comes over time
Why tf can you trademark colours which are a naturally occurring thing?
exactly
They will loose in the court hahah
it’s probably only trademarked in like advertising and packaging situations. so like pepsi couldn’t have a red label or fedex can’t use ups brown.
@@shishbish9489 I know it's still stupid, owning a colour when it comes to branding is bs
@@ysbrandd from what I heard its to stop competitors from trying to copy them and steal their sales. It's only trademarked in their specific field. It kind of makes sense because we do associate specific colors to specific brands. The was a case a while back where a very successful company had used brown as their color and a competitor came in with that exact same color, which ended up fooling alot of people into thinking it was the original company. This caused a massive decrease in sales for the original company.
I love tiffany box blue.....
Its the best color...
This man's accent 🤌🏼
He sounds like Hamza. 😂
He’s a scouser
Liverpool
Great accent!! This man's speech is still very understandable
I have learned a lot with him, he's not only well informed about fashion but also nice to see for our eyes
Most of these companies have only trademarked these colors if another company is in the same field. Like a fast food chain can probably use these luxury colors since they are not in competition with them.
you cannot trademark colour, Cadbury recently lost a case on the colour trademark issue
I was thinking the same.. they will lose the case in court.. even if they trademark it they will lose because colors don’t belong to them. But a pattern can be another debate
U can trademark colour, Mattel pink in kids toy's. T-Mobile magenta in cellular service, UPS in hauling and package transport.
Cadbury wanna broader category, that's why registration flopped
I own a pot of laboutin sole paint 10 years back, still fresh and usable. They also sell stickable red rubber soles to stick over the paint to give the shoe more purchase and grip. Unfortunately i can only wear heals to dance in and no fancy shoes to walk for a night out just worth the Knowledge for anyone wishing to purchase a pair or upcycle a collectible.
Fashion brands are less likely to have trademarked colours as fashion is based on trend cycles.
Whereas for the other companies mentioned, their trademarks strongly connect to their branding. If they did not use their colour, they would not be recognisable. Also offers protection from copy cat competitors within their own industry.
I think it's important to point out that these are very specificly defined colors. You can use red for instance, just not the exact (or too close to the exact) shade of Coca-cola. It's not red in general. There has to be a specific and narrow definition for a trade mark to be placed.
And everyone involved in this practice has a one way ticket to you know where. Greed.
this is probably the least evil thing these capitalist corporations have done
@@olal9904 yeah, lol
What, claiming ownership of a colour? Literally light reflecting off a surface. That isn't evil?
@@danhumungous9887 they only really have ownership of the colour in there respective field. It keeps people from making products that are basically copying them that could trick people. Just because coke has rights over red it doesn’t really mean that no other drink company can use red. They just can’t use the exact same red in a significant way
@@cdogdeluxe6037 it's that shade of that color. Just trademark a different shade
The color trademark is not for a plain color but the color combination. It is a thing in the us with American companies, louboutin actually lost a lawsuit in Europe against YSL for the use of red soles. However the color trademark in the US is only for same industry. For example I can start a fashion house and have my logos and colors to be the ups brown yellow combo start a parcels company and use the red and white Coca Cola colors but I can’t have a parcels business with the brown yellow UPS colors and can’t have a soft drink with red and white colors because they are recognizable in their respective industries by their colors. Since the color plays a role in brand recognition, a competitor no matter how small cannot use their colors.
The fact that I knew all of the luxury brand color trademarks and not all of the common trademarks is both astonishing and terrifying
There's a lot more to it than just using the color. You have to be gaining a profit of sorts and marketing predominantly off of that color and it also depends on what you're selling. If you're selling bags, don't use a bag company color, etc.
The color has to be very specific and used in a specific way.
Louboutin's have a Shiny Red bottom and a contrasting top.
So anyone can make an all over shiny red shoe..
But only Louboutin can do a matte red top with a shiny red bottom.
You have to establish brand recognition and that confusion will arise if another brand does the same colors or iconography.
A heap of companies in australia were in a legal standoff with Cadbury over the colour purple in general, for anything chocolate based. This was back in the 00's. I worked for one of the companies. Sadly Cadbury got their way. So not always one trademarked shade.
Mattel has trademarked their pink and McDonalds has trademarked their yellow
Oh yeah McDonalds!! Good one
@@luxecollective Does that mean if you change the color code by one digit it’s no longer a trademarked color?
@@T3MUwU even if it is used I another industry like the yellow is only banned for restaurantq
@@T3MUwU Nope, u can't use it in same category. U can't make a barbie clone and use Mattel pink. But u can open a beauty saloon and make logo in Mattel pink
I love his accent so so much 😍😍😍
It is only in certain contexts and they often dont stand up to opposition (,in uk and europe at least. Dont know about US trademark law)
Paddy Pimblet if he talked about fashion instead of doing MMA
Aiyo bro 💀 ☠️ 💀 ☠️
I doubt anyone can trademark black. It’s a ubiquitous colour
I think this can be done, but u get a very limited trademark, for specific product.
You dont get sued for using a colour, it's not enforceable. Not currently. Sueing is only on the cards if you're trying to mimic the product incl ith their colour, and even then they have to prove you are.
bottega veneta green is legendary, i was surprised when it wasnt even mentioned
Dear Lord!! I love your accent so much!!!
Some have tried but color they wanted to trade mark was far to generic to actually trademark or their request to trademark a specific color was so broad/over reaching that they denied it.
If they come up with and named a color after them, and then trademarked/patented that, I can see it but I dont think they can simply sue you for using a shade of a color unless its the specific one that they trade marked.
No one can "own" a color as a whole, maybe a specific shade but a company can't just own "Purple" it has to be a subset of said color that is unique identifiable because if it is one that is too frequently used or too broad they can't obtain it.
Its just a way for people to get the express ticket to greed and fortune, its rather disgusting and depressing.
It isn't just fashion brands but also sports teams, tile, and other stuff I'm sure just can't think of any right now
I love this guy's accent. Does anyone know what type of accent he has?
Liverpool, I think.
scouse accent aka liverpool
And Barbie! Obviously the shade of pink
And Nickelodeon orange is also trademark
“In order for a color to be marked, it requires that there be proof of a “secondary meaning.” This means that a color can only be trademarked in connection with a good or service if, through the use of the color over time, the public has come to associate that color with a particular brand”
So no is the answer, you can’t just get sued unless you start a similar brand with their colors.
“Secondary meaning can be extremely difficult to prove, unless the color or color combination is not widely used for other goods and services, is unusual, or is elaborate. One of the best ways to demonstrate this is by providing a high volume of advertising in which the color mark has been used.”
So they will probably not even sue you because it’s too much effort to prove.
RGB colour wheel 1 off the trademarked colour. Looks identical, but isn't.
His accent makes me love him even more
They on is in specific segments, u made is sound general as if they owned that colour but that's not the case, for coke they own that share of red but only for drinks, if u used it for a shoes brand logo they can do anything same goes for the rest.
It’s pretty insane to be able to trademark a color. It seems against all logic.
Exactly but they get scientific with it down to the exact Ingredients to formulate their colors
It's only ever in the context of the product. Ie. Coke being red and pepsi being blue. So other companies can't pretend to be that companies product and steal sales from people who don't pay attention.
It seems to mostly be done to distinguish real items from fakes,
Hence Culture Hustle paints, if you haven't seen them, check it out they're great ❤️
The way he says purple… makes me feel things inside 🫣
So you only get a trademark if your brand is recognised by the general public, Tiffany blue was already known but it’s not the colour, it’s the likeness to the colour and brand, no one will recognise the orange or grey, Also big company’s could only do this because it’s not really possible to trade mark a colour you can’t own colour, you can trade mark the likeness to that colour, “it’s more like Tiffany blue” or Louie red “ that’s trademark
It’s important to know that these trademarks usually only apply to competing products, and only specific shades. Like target has a trademark on their specific shade of red, meaning Walmart can’t use that red color in their branding or products, as an example. And that usually applies to similar red shades. It’s why Coke and target can’t and don’t sue each other for both using bright, high saturation red colors in their branding, or staples and target, or Walmart and Facebook, twitter, or any of the myriad internet and tech companies using blue. You also typically can’t file for a trademark if everyone in the industry commonly uses that color or a similar one (internet/ tech companies all using various blues, for example). Trademark and copyright laws are fucking complicated and often a nightmare to navigate. And that’s why these corporate lawyers make fucking _baaaaank._ Shit like this gets hyper specialized.
You can not trademark black or white as there are no shades of those colors.
T-mobile has trademarked their magenta pink and won some lawsuits about stealing "their" color.
Yes but u can u colour that looks identical to naked eye bit is slightly different combo of red blue green
It's funny how people in comment sections always seem to be taking things out of context and are severely uneducated in the field.
To clarify, no they do not "own" that color, you can still use red, you can still use purple etc. They just own the color in their specific field. For example, Tiffany and Co. owns the shade "Tiffany Blue", but only in jewelry boxes. Coca Cola also only owns that specific shade of red in softdrinks/pop cans.
They do this to prevent people copying their brand and making fakes. And no, you will likely not get sued if you use a trademarked color for that product too. Them trademarking those colors are largely for INFRINGEMENT SCHEMES.
What about the Valentino's red and lanvin's bleu
color - him: "Kuh-Leh"
This is a very normal thing. As you have classifications for services and goods with the registration at EUIPO (European Intellectual Property Office) So for example for Christian Louboutians, there are no other shoe designer who can make heels and use a similiar color red under the sole.
Read similiar as the judge looks at "confusion for the normal public"
Anyway ty ty
So they are trademarking some digital calibration of that color? Otherwise I don't understand what trademarking a color meane
Sounds like Paddy Pimblett.
It only works if you want to use that colour for a similar product. If you want to use eggs could m colour for a different product you are fine.
The accent 😍
And you cannot just simply trademark a colour, there are over 1,867 solid pantone colours; if brands all claim a colour, we’ll eventually run out. You can only trademark colours within a design, like Louboutins red under heals.
There are caveats to the trademarking of a color, typically if the color is too broad or basic it can't be trademarked, you can't really be sued for using the color but let's say if you made a candy just like resses and used that shade of orange for your candy then yeah you'd probably get sued. It's so a brand is recognizable in their industry by that color specifically
They don't completely own their colour. Although I can't make a fizzy drink with coca cola red, I can make anything else with that colour, and you can't trade mark colours which are functional, so colours that are used for an actual purpose. That means you can't, for example make hi viz jackets and trade mark the bright yellow, because it has the function of making the wearer visible
I'm not sure you CAN trademark black. Don't have source off the top of my head but you need a specific shade usually, black is just not unique enough to allow one brand to stop everyone else in the particular industry from using it.
I'm also pretty sure that glossier trademarked their pink
Same with bottega veneta, they trademarked their green
Has Tommy Hill done blue and red rectangles?
To register a colour trademark, you are required to have a unique colour that is not on the Pantone colour scale, for example, Cadbury's Purple. The colours used in the brands mentioned are not unique or distinctive enough to be successfully registered as trademarks.
Louboutin have trademark for RED yes, but we talk only about insoles.
Barbie Pink is also ™, in category toys.
Panther Isolation pink is also trademark, but only in isolation materials.
T-Mobile magenta, trademark in cellular service.
Should 100% not be allowed to tm a color. Absurd laws to protect rich corporations.
I mean you can use the color just not to sell a product in the same space. Like if I was selling chocolate in a box the UPS brown they could attempt to sue but I doubt it would hold up in court.
Working in the printing industry. That is a common thing. Some brands need there color printed exclusively that color. There are Pantone that are only used for there branding
Simply using a color won't stand but altering logos for one's reasoning, Maybe
LV, Tiffany and Hermes don’t need to waste their money trademarking those colors because guess what.. the marketing association with those colors with their brands is powerful enough. When you look at that shade of aqua/orange colors you already associate them with luxury because of LV, Hermes and Tiffany & Co.
i’m sorry i know u get this a bunch but the scouse accent is soooo soothing and melodic
Barbie pink too
Valentino's red ,is also trademarked
"KoLaAhH"
Look, look, it's colorsss
His accent 🤣🤣 I love it. Perrpal.
To legally trademark a color you need to prove thst your brand is strongly associated with that colour and that product only. Do Cadbury has trademarked *purple chocolate wrapper* not purple as a whole
I could be wrong here but I thought some NFL teams trademark some colors I don't know if it has to do with anything like that but when you buy stuff at the store it is the team colors
They can have trademarks for color combination, but they are very limited.
If u are team u trademark logo's, slogans (IRC Liverpool FC have trademark for "u will never walk alone".
I think some may have tried but struggled
Love your accent 🤩🤩🤩😍😍😍😍
How can you trademark a colour. So if I'm wearing one of them colours, they can sue me?
How do you trademark black?
How can you for get mattels pink for barbie. Well known
That's the thing about companies trademarking colors... they can't enforce it
I thought you could only trademark a colour if it was combined with something. Like the red colour base of high heels is a trademark. But the colour itself isn’t. So I could use that same colour red as a colour for my car, just not with the base of high heels.
I heard collar😅...instead of colour 🤣.
Burberry’s checked and tartan patern is trademarked
These big brands didn't trademark a color they don't own? That's crazy
You cant do this everywhere... Andyou can use whatevet colour you want
The neutral colors cant be trade marked as well black, certain shades of grey as well as pink
Does gucci trademark green and red?
Okay. So. The lesson is trademarking is done by “cheap” brands and luxury brands don’t.
You sound like paddy the baddy lol. Love the scousers accent
UPS is a fashion statement 😜
Trademarking color is stupid tbh especially if the colors are not even unique. These brand who trademarked their color did not even have unique color at all. It is ridiculous.
Nice represent hoodie
🌎🛠