You r only one teacher on youtube in law who is doing all topic and great video now i m thinking that let prepare judiciary although i was listening your lecture for llb
1. Start your preparation of Judicial Service at home with our membership plan. For more details drop a message on WhatsApp on this number : 8840961324 or visit this link WhatsApp. wa.me/message/KQFV6VUK5AIWB1 2. Follow us on: Instagram: instagram.com/theoryofabrogation?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y= 3. Twitter:mobile.twitter.com/NajeebU83984530 4. Facebook: facebook.com/theoryofabrogation
Sir..thank you...Apne samjhane ke saath saath...answer writting tip bhi de di....! This is the Beauty of your lecture which makes it different from other UA-cam lecture...😍
. Which of the following is true of the effects of admissions? A. an admission constitutes a substantive piece of evidence in the case and, for that reason, can be relied upon for proving the truth of the facts incorporated therein B. an admission has the effect of shifting the onus of proving to the contrary on the party against whom it is produced, with the result that it casts an imperative duty on such party to explain it. In the absence of a satisfactory explanation, it is presumed to true C. an admission, in order to be competent and to have the value and effect referred to above should be clear, certain and definite, and not ambiguous, vague to be true D. all of them
How can an admission be proved by or on behalf of the person making it if he is dead? The text of the bare act only assumes that since if he was dead it would have been admissible as under section 32(2) therefore as he is alive such an admission may be proved. One needs to be alive to prove his admission.
In simple words wo statement jo statement ki truthfulness k bajae statement dene wale ki state of mind, emotion ya physical condition bayan kre.. for example.. if I say "there was a heated argument between A and B this statement is offered to show anger regardless of what happened between A and B .. correct me if I'm wrong
Dost mast samjhaya yaar tune bhut se bando ko ye section clear nahi hai, thanks and best of luck....... Dost tumhara contact number mil sakta hai kya...?
Hi, can you better explain the relevancy and admissibility of hearsay evidence. What if a lawyer of opposite party gives statement u/s 161 of Cr.P.C. before police as a hearsay. Example- I heard from Mr. X who told me that he seen accused abusing, fighting with petitioner.
Burden of proof pe bhi bnaye.. 101-103 thoda confusing hai.. galat ho jate hai Q.. jaise Universal main diye hai.. objectives confusions rehta hai.. please video bnaye sir.. thank you
Dv act aur 125 crpc Jeet chukA hu Mera 498a charge frame stage per hi dv aur 125 crpc ki story same 498 a me bhi hi Kya 498 ka trial chalna jaruri jabki section 58 evidence kahta hi Jo ek bar prove ho chuki hi use dubara prove karne ki jarurat nahi to sir Mera dv act aur 125 me prove chukA hi ki ladki jhuthi hi Kya 498 ko dubara prove karne ki Kya jarurt hi agar aapke esa judgement ya rules hi to pls help kariye
Apke padhane se sare confusion dur ho jate h
Sir aap se Mera Sara concept clear ho jata hai apka batane ka tarika accha hai
You r only one teacher on youtube in law who is doing all topic and great video now i m thinking that let prepare judiciary although i was listening your lecture for llb
1. Start your preparation of Judicial Service at home with our membership plan. For more details drop a message on WhatsApp on this number : 8840961324 or visit this link WhatsApp. wa.me/message/KQFV6VUK5AIWB1
2. Follow us on:
Instagram: instagram.com/theoryofabrogation?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y=
3. Twitter:mobile.twitter.com/NajeebU83984530
4. Facebook: facebook.com/theoryofabrogation
33k views and only 850 likes
Please like his videos it takes so much efforts to clear the law topics
21 section clear hi nhi ho rhi thi... Aapki video Dekhi bht helpful h thank you 🤗
You are excellent sir ur lecture very helpful
Sir aap bahut achha samjhate h. V nice
Evidence act ke best flatform ke owner ko bhut bhut Dhanyawad har section ko itna deep me samjha ke liye
Sirji bahut bahut dhanyawad. Bade mushkil se ye sec meri samaz mein aaya.
Sir..thank you...Apne samjhane ke saath saath...answer writting tip bhi de di....! This is the Beauty of your lecture which makes it different from other UA-cam lecture...😍
Sir thnku so mch jo kbhi clg me nh smjh aaya wo aapke lecture se smjh aajata h
Thank you, sir! You are the GOAT.
Em from Pakistan ...... I have no words to admire you ....... praiseworthy
Ayesha Cheema
Like share aye na aye you are hit sir...name fame to ek din zaroor ayega .....par You are best youtube teacher 😘😘
Jo coaching mai concept nahi clear hote wo apse clear ho jate hai bro
Thnku so much sir.. sec 21 ko itne ache s clear krne k liye.. bhutt jyada difficulties hori thi but this video clear my all doubts about this sec..😊
Thankyou sir
Thank u so much for the explanation. Can't be more greatful. Evidence can be so confusing if not understood properly
Najeebkhan11, YOU ARE DOING GREAT SERVICE TO THE LAW STUDENTS.!!!
You are amazing Thankyou so much you have made evidence easy
very good and informative VERY NICE
Thanku so much sir .u r always great personality 👌
JazakAllah khair
Video was helpful..thank you
Thank you so much for this lecture.
Good explanation ☺️👌
Thank u sir for help to clear soul of this section 21.
. Which of the following is true of the effects of admissions?
A. an admission constitutes a substantive piece of evidence in the case and, for that reason, can be relied upon for proving the truth of the facts incorporated therein
B. an admission has the effect of shifting the onus of proving to the contrary on the party against whom it is produced, with the result that it casts an imperative duty on such party to explain it. In the absence of a satisfactory explanation, it is presumed to true
C. an admission, in order to be competent and to have the value and effect referred to above should be clear, certain and definite, and not ambiguous, vague to be true
D. all of them
Thank you so much.
Kl mera evidence ka internal exam h bs apki videos ka hi sahara h bhaijaan
Kuch chije aap bahut aachi tarahh bata lete hai.. thanks ..tpa act ka 100 BHI plz, clear kare bhai mere thnxxx
Thankyou sir 🙌
God bless you . Keep it up . Sir please make a vedio on crpc
Very knowledgeable video sir
Well explained v.usefui thanks so much continue sir please
Awesome Sir thank you for explaining
U r doing great job sir.. Thanks
Sir thanks I am going cover up all section of IEA before starting of my class..
Sir pls try to continue viz sec. 21 to 30
How can an admission be proved by or on behalf of the person making it if he is dead? The text of the bare act only assumes that since if he was dead it would have been admissible as under section 32(2) therefore as he is alive such an admission may be proved.
One needs to be alive to prove his admission.
True..
Please tell the difference between dyling declaration and section21(1)
I am not able to understand both sections seems same to me
Why is this sec so complex ...Jo apne samjhaya wo samajh aya but iska scope nhi samajh aya subsection 2 nd 3 ka scope?
In simple words wo statement jo statement ki truthfulness k bajae statement dene wale ki state of mind, emotion ya physical condition bayan kre.. for example.. if I say "there was a heated argument between A and B this statement is offered to show anger regardless of what happened between A and B .. correct me if I'm wrong
I m preparing for UPPCSJ.. this vedio was helpful.. thanq 😊
😊
Sir its a request to mention cases names in description box
Thanks for the video sir
Am preparing UPPCSJ........very helpful this video's
ur greatttt ur lectures are very helpful ❤
Me LLM kr rhi hu or apk vedio bht helpful he
Your videos are awesome, they have helped me a lot in understanding many laws, thank you so much
Thank you very much sir ji
Outstanding
introduction of admission mai apne bola tha ki esa khi ni likha hua ki agar admission apne intrest mai bhi ho ki tb vo admissible ni hogi...
Vry effectively explained sir..thks
Dost mast samjhaya yaar tune bhut se bando ko ye section clear nahi hai, thanks and best of luck....... Dost tumhara contact number mil sakta hai kya...?
Hi, can you better explain the relevancy and admissibility of hearsay evidence. What if a lawyer of opposite party gives statement u/s 161 of Cr.P.C. before police as a hearsay. Example- I heard from Mr. X who told me that he seen accused abusing, fighting with petitioner.
Thank you
Section 11 pe detailed vedio banao doosre sections se connect karte hueis par koi achi vedio nahi hai you tube par
Sir agar Bo mar jata h to fir admission ki relevancy kya reh jayegi....
Kyuki admission to us person k agsinst ki kaam krta h jo admit kr rha ho ...
Niceee
Thanq u sir...I understood it
Thank you sir
sir different between contradiction and corroboration
Great job sir
Sir indian evidences act1872 section7ke tahat manvaadhikar ka palan section17 ka palan
Burden of proof pe bhi bnaye.. 101-103 thoda confusing hai.. galat ho jate hai Q.. jaise Universal main diye hai.. objectives confusions rehta hai.. please video bnaye sir.. thank you
thanks a lot, it really helped me alot!!
What is retentive confession ?
Awesome sir
Great
👌👌👌👌👍
thanku
👍👌👌👍👍👍☺️
I need your help sir plz reply what is way to talk to you
Is admission direct or indirect evidence
bhai confession ki bhi bna dai plz...!
Brilliant
Thanku so much
Sir for a statement to be admissible under Section -21(1) is it necessary that the death of the person is caused?
No, because the word “if” is used
Dv act aur 125 crpc Jeet chukA hu Mera 498a charge frame stage per hi dv aur 125 crpc ki story same 498 a me bhi hi Kya 498 ka trial chalna jaruri jabki section 58 evidence kahta hi Jo ek bar prove ho chuki hi use dubara prove karne ki jarurat nahi to sir Mera dv act aur 125 me prove chukA hi ki ladki jhuthi hi Kya 498 ko dubara prove karne ki Kya jarurt hi agar aapke esa judgement ya rules hi to pls help kariye
Thanks
Sir pehla point nhi smjh aya
Sir, will illustration (c) under section 21 be admissible under clause (3) of section 21 as well?
excellent sir
jazakAllah
Thx sir
Namskar sir , please upload iea 1872 releted section burden of pruff and important sections.please.
ye 21 (1) samajh nhi aya bhut confusion hai aapki samjhane mein
thanks sir
Good
You are too good
👌
Very nice sir
Falsehood improbable means truth in all form??
plz make video for llm entrance exam for clat llm and du llm
🙌🙌🙌
Very nice 😊
You are great Scholar I am really impressed with your knowledge and Skills Keep it up
Bare act bhi explain kijiye plz
Sir plz upload the lecture of section 22,23 of IEA...
Sir agar mar jata tbhi likha hua admissible hoga
Sec 32 pura samjha digiye
good morning
ji
Happy I'd in advance
Good morning... Aapko bhi happy eid :)
apne section 22 and 23 nhi bnaya h