VW Golf MK4 1.4L vs 1.6L vs 1.8 L vs 1.8T vs 1.9L TDI vs 2.0L vs 2.3L vs 2.8 vs R32 0-100 km/h

VW Golf IV
VW Golf IV 1.4L (75 Hp)
VW Golf IV 1.6L (101 Hp)
VW Golf IV 1.6L (105 Hp)
VW Golf IV 1.8L (125 Hp)
VW Golf IV 1.8T (150 Hp)
VW Golf IV 1.8T (180 Hp)
VW Golf IV 1.9 SDI (68 Hp)
VW Golf IV 1.9 TDI (90 Hp)
VW Golf IV 1.9 TDI (101 Hp)
VW Golf IV 1.9 TDI (110 Hp)
VW Golf IV 1.9 TDI (115 Hp)
VW Golf IV 1.9 TDI (130 Hp)
VW Golf IV 1.9 TDI (150 Hp)
VW Golf IV 2.0 (115 Hp)
VW Golf IV 2.3 V5 (150 Hp)
VW Golf IV 2.3 VR5 (170 Hp)
VW Golf IV 2.8 V6 (204 Hp)
VW Golf IV R32 3.2 (240 Hp)

[@floatygoatto5180]

1.6 105hp did very well

[@KUAHOG]

Thanks 😁😁😁😁

[@ArdeleanuMihai]

Great engine

[@HolyEDBahamuth]

@@ArdeleanuMihai The 1.6 16V is actually pretty similiar to the Engine Polo III GTI uses, which i consider one of the best engines VW has ever built and should have further developed instead of giving ppl shitty 1.4 TSI crap whichs pistons all broke into 10k pieces after 35k miles or something....

[@ArdeleanuMihai]

@@HolyEDBahamuth I agree

[@carharttblade]

@@HolyEDBahamuth I have 1.6 petrol, BTS code, in my ibiza, it pulls damn well, but after going over 4000rpm some weird smells come to the cabin, like that its overheating, it got to 96°C few days ago, not sure if that is gonna be a problem. Can i put it in 5000 rpm range with out worrying its gonna blow up the engine? Redline is on like 5800

[@eskrimakravmaga8536]

The 1.6 16v can sport with many of those and even win, only the v6 ones can outperform him by a lot. For a naturally aspirated engine thats really impressive.

[@ramizmehmedovic3935]

Golf 1.6 16v💪💪

[@linotellez4116]

Hell ya bro! That is exactly what I needed lol. Well make video 👌

[@J.F.K.O]

kinda wild that the SDI actually made some wheel spin :P

[@rikyoh130]

Wow as a golf fan this video is gold

[@da_sprengi7083]

4:45 how can you do that with a cold engine?

[@FStan-co8vv]

Broken temperature sensor. Engine is hot in reality, but the defective sensor makes the computer display that the engine is cold

[@kadoaydemir5119]

Nice 👍👍👍

[@duxi2420]

Thank you! :)

[@tobih.3238]

1:38 omg that is very very slow hooollyyy...

[@zazaaydemir1913]

👍👍👍👍👍👍

[@mein_nickname]

This is all wrong. The rev counter advances by 5 km/h. Your acceleration test was from 0-95 km/h.

[@user-jw5gp5zb2r]

Я не пойму время выставляли так на выбор дизель разгоняется быстрей чем 2.5 бензин

[@PETERKOTSMID]

👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍

[@pabloconde928]

SDI 0-100: maybe

[@petergolfmk4399]

The good one is 1.9 TDI the 130 HP

[@cet.420]

1.8T is much better

[@user-ns4uu3ju1b]

1.9Tdi 130hp)

[@berkankarakose4422]

Ik have hot the VR5 its realy fast and gas a original exsaust grom the R32

[@pslvc399]

What is the best motorization for someone who drives very little during the year (mainly on vacation or only on weekends). I‘m seriously considering buying a Golf 4. Thank you!

[@ArdeleanuMihai]

1.6 16V seems like the optimal choice or 1.8 if you want some more power

[@pslvc399]

@@ArdeleanuMihai Thank you!

[@musztardowytygrys3230]

Dlaczego ukradliscie materiał z kanału 1Wojciech1985p jak już coś wstawiacie to napiszcie od kogo to wzięliście. Kultura wymagałaby na początku zapytać...

[@virgilem1011]

i have a 1.4 75HP but i bought it with BBS wheels with the golf logo on it... can someone tell me if it was sold like that on any golf 4?

[@mitchellvandenbrink]

No, maybe on some GTI models but definitly not on the 1.4

[@ahmedfawzy8463]

Wow

[@stelioskostaras9717]

I mean...the 1.4 is not THAT bad. It can put in some work

[@ArdeleanuMihai]

It's not that bad but it's a little lazy

[@fernandobatista2835]

Hola alguien conoce un golf 1.8 turbo diésel de los años 90... Saben si hay repuestos??

[@MK4KILLERZ]

ua-cam.com/video/_kkga_0mBAA/v-deo.html

[@GHH_GL]

Короче лучше 1.8т и r32 👍

[@Ivancp13]

that 1.9 tdi 101hp did it in 9 secs, not in 11.3s

[@aldinramic8128]

Where???

[@thomaskahle9978]

No Way!

[@rallipete]

The newer gauges look horrible imo

[@enicaeduard]

Why would I buy an r32 when that 2.8 vr6 is just cheaper and is half a second slower

[@konstantinmondeshki643]

And sounds also good

[@superleggera1900]

R32's run around 6 flat to 60 (into the 5's with a tune). But you can tune a GTI to be as quick, so it's mostly engine preference. Although the R32 has a lot more chassis upgrades and differences.

[@MrBagelRaider]

AWD is probably the biggest reason

[@Sebbe-qw8ho]

Because its an r32 😂

[@roux78_96]

Ist der Motor kalt, gib ihm 6 einhalb

[@FStan-co8vv]

Temperatursensor defekt..

[@KUAHOG]

The Golf 1.6 (105 hp) is my video ...very soon i will upload another vid with 1.8t gti ..u can steal this one as welll 🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@KUAHOG]

I still have the car and runs great still !! Now it has 189000 km !!

[@dzryad7400]

@@KUAHOG woow

[@marinodonez]

@@KUAHOG I have same and car have chip, egr delete and cold air intake. Sounds great. I'm thinking about decat.

[@KUAHOG]

@@marinodonez u need to try 1.8 t..u will forget about 1.6 😋

[@marinodonez]

@@KUAHOG Yes, this car is slow but is my first. Next must be 6cyl. Thinking about 3.2 or 3.6 fsi

[@dzryad7400]

V5 wtf

[@patrickbeerhorst9674]

1.6L (110 Hp) missing ;-)

[@nikylzpavlinov7162]

not have 1.6 110 man

[@piotrmaslak5149]

@@nikylzpavlinov7162 HE MENT 1.6 FSI WITH 110 HP ;)

[@nikylzpavlinov7162]

@@piotrmaslak5149okay now its diferent

[@barnabuza1349]

I think the vr6 was 2.8 i 170 horsepower and the r32 was a original v6 with turbo ..

[@tomascilia9208]

The r32 its N/A and ots have arround 250hp

[@hiimzdeny__2878]

VR6 never had turbos in stock.

[@JamesPCroad]

Mk3 VR6 was 174PS for the 2.8, and 190PS for the Euro only 2.9 Syncro...
The R32 was again, NA and no turbos on any of the VR engines...