Better Than a TRX? I Drive The Ford F-150 Raptor R Across Country - How Is The MPG!?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 14 жов 2024
  • TFL runs on Sinclair fuel and so should you. Download the Sinclair DINOPAY app and start saving as much as $0.10 or more per gallon on your next fill-up. ( www.sinclairoi...
    ( www.alltfl.com/) Check out our new spot to find ALL our content, from news to videos and our podcasts!
    Ford F-150 Raptor R fuel economy test!
    ( / tflcar ) Visit our Patreon page to support the TFL team!
    Watch more videos from TFL Studios:
    The Fast Lane Truck ( / tfltruck )
    The Fast Lane Car ( / tflcar )
    TFLoffroad ( / tfloffroad )
    TFLbike ( / tflbike )
    TFLnow ( / tflnow )
    TFLclassics ( / tflclassics )
    TFLtalk ( / tfltalk )
    TFL Podcasts:
    TFL Talkin' Cars Podcast ( redcircle.com/... )
    TFL Talkin' Trucks Podcast ( redcircle.com/... )
    #Ford #F150 #raptor

КОМЕНТАРІ •

  • @chriscon8463
    @chriscon8463 Рік тому +45

    I liked Tommy’s quote “Don’t floor it TOO much…we’re doing an MPG test here!”

    • @WW-wf8tu
      @WW-wf8tu Рік тому +1

      That was not a "quote" it was a request for dad not to ruin the MPG ratings by driving like an ape. 😏

  • @95tman
    @95tman Рік тому +12

    It’s worse than I expected.. but it’s really not bad. My lifted v8 tundra got 12 and my lifted Tacoma gets 16… so considering the raptor has a boosted v8 and 37’s 13.5 is actually pretty solid

  • @reallyemptypockets6509
    @reallyemptypockets6509 Рік тому +69

    I was going to buy a 700 hp supercharged v-8 powered, 37 inch tired, $110,000 truck, But I just found out that it only gets 10 mpg, and that’s not acceptable 😂

    • @salamov963
      @salamov963 Рік тому +2

      Very surprising right

    • @jeffk464
      @jeffk464 Рік тому

      Some people feel guilty about their carbon footprint. They want a cool car or truck but don't want to feel bad about it, its not only an issue of the cost of gas. Why do you think Audi can sell a $140,000 electric luxury car?

    • @jml9550
      @jml9550 Рік тому

      @@jeffk464 yep, and the Porsche Taycan are selling well.

    • @kellyfontes7757
      @kellyfontes7757 Рік тому +3

      @@jeffk464 The sourcing of that electrtic car alone is a much bigger carbon footprint

    • @jeffk464
      @jeffk464 Рік тому

      @@jml9550 Taycan and the etron GT are the same platform. I think the Audi looks better inside and out.

  • @edwinwebber8104
    @edwinwebber8104 Рік тому +8

    I have a 2001 Excursion 7.3, the best mileage I ever had loaded with 7 passengers and the back full of luggage, just over 19 mpg going from Grand Junction to Durango CO. I consistently get 18 plus running expressways at 75 mph, around town 9 to 13 mpg all starting and stopping. I think I will just keep putting about $1,200.00 into it per year for maintenance 😊

    • @davidaix5771
      @davidaix5771 Рік тому +2

      Those 7.3l v8 Powerstroke diesels were Bulletproof always wanted an Excursion with a 7.3 say no to 6.0 I'd even opt for the v10 over that

    • @ajmedeiros77
      @ajmedeiros77 Рік тому +1

      Best suv ever made

  • @paulmadkow9143
    @paulmadkow9143 Рік тому +107

    If you can afford these trucks, you can certainly afford the fuel costs, so it's a moot point.

    • @dubba07
      @dubba07 Рік тому +13

      *moot

    • @kameronlarsen7
      @kameronlarsen7 Рік тому +6

      You might care about fuel tank range though and better mpg helps

    • @warhorsesurvival
      @warhorsesurvival Рік тому +9

      Lots of people that can’t afford a raptoR will buy one and get hit with a double whammy!

    • @DT-ml6ef
      @DT-ml6ef Рік тому

      Yes if you can afford the truck gas is a minor detail. How's the insurance cost?

    • @larrythomas6068
      @larrythomas6068 Рік тому +1

      ​or the cost of plates in colorado

  • @rondail5675
    @rondail5675 Рік тому +3

    I am not a Ford guy but that is a very nice truck, in & out, and powertrain. Well done Ford.

  • @secondamendment8773
    @secondamendment8773 Рік тому +7

    I think you should do the same thing on the way back and then average them for a more consistent mileage loop.

  • @ChasingDifferentAdventures
    @ChasingDifferentAdventures Рік тому +2

    In Los Angeles, California, the local dealership had the Shelby American Super Snake for $141,000, which is dealership price.
    They also have the black F150 Raptor R, for $230,000 again dealership price.
    As much as the Raptor R is more built for off road, there was also the F150 Roush
    Off road at $94,000 in 7 years I'll buy the Roush. Currently, driving a 2022 Roush Mustang with the 3rd Pedal 6 Speed Manual Transmission. Therefore, markups are still up

  • @joshz7712
    @joshz7712 Рік тому +3

    Personally I love my Gen 2. I prefer the 3.5 because of the fuel consumption and its not hard to get it over 700hp.

  • @GunfightersINC
    @GunfightersINC Рік тому +1

    I have an R.. couldn't care less what it costs to fill.. all I care about is the fuel capacity, which is 36, so I don't have to constantly fill it up. Good test none the less.

  • @jonscott7686
    @jonscott7686 Рік тому +2

    I would still want to TRX I’m not gonna cry about less than a mile per gallon difference

  • @joegotz1971
    @joegotz1971 Рік тому +14

    I had a 2014 Roush Supercharged Raptor that got 12 mpg. Gets old fast. My Gen 2 gets 15 mpg average and with a 36 gallon tank that’s 100 more miles per tank.

    • @302Mustang13
      @302Mustang13 Рік тому

      Curious how the H.O. Ecoboost compares on power. A 6.2 with a TVS is probably a lot quicker but the regular gen 1 Ecoboost I drove a long time ago still impresses me to this day. A much lighter aluminum body truck with more power and a 10 speed should be even more impressive.

    • @jml9550
      @jml9550 Рік тому

      Yeah I get it. My wife’s older Lexus V6 needs to fill up every 2 weeks. Our Lexus hybrid will arrive in 3 weeks and with a 14 gallon tank, she will get ~500 miles per tank, which is probably fill up once a month.

    • @robinator3202
      @robinator3202 Рік тому +2

      I agree with you on the Gen lol. My light foot gets me 18.9-19.4 in mine. Love the performance and the ability to save money at the pump.

    • @joegotz1971
      @joegotz1971 Рік тому +1

      @@302Mustang13 The 20104 was heavier. The Gen 2 is not quite as fast as the Gen with the 6.2L. Off the line for the first 100 feet I would say they are close. The 6.2 will pull away at the end of the 1/4 mile.

    • @blakedavenport266
      @blakedavenport266 Рік тому

      @@joegotz1971 gen 2 is quite a bit faster, unless you are talking a gen 1 with a supercharger and then it's about even. The Gen 2 has the 10 speed, it's 600 pounds lighter give or take and has 39 more hp and and 80 or more TQ.

  • @McCracken216
    @McCracken216 Рік тому +3

    Better than I expected. It's not the cost, it's that I don't like to make frequent stops to fill up.

  • @ArkansaDave1
    @ArkansaDave1 Рік тому +1

    Not to take away from the awesome video, but as an Alaskan my favorite part is seeing all the snow melting.

  • @the305hauler
    @the305hauler Рік тому +3

    Booyah 👊🏽 😁 👍🏽 🇺🇸
    Both are ridiculously expensive and out of my price range.
    Even the 3.5L is crazy expensive.

  • @JR-pb5dz
    @JR-pb5dz Рік тому +16

    Both the R and the TRX are insane. TRX has no option but 4x4 and the R probably ran 2 wheel drive most the time, so that is a likely explanation on the MPG difference.

    • @davidaix5771
      @davidaix5771 Рік тому +1

      No see you got that confused they both have 4 x 4 the TRX is a full-time 4 wheel drive with a center differential now the Raptor typar is part-time four-wheel drive with the transfer case

    • @joshraleigh101
      @joshraleigh101 Рік тому +6

      He’s correct as a TRX owner it stays in AWD . The Raptor stays in 2wd until you switch it.

    • @Brownlightning1990
      @Brownlightning1990 Рік тому +1

      But they drove in in 4 hi…they say in the beginning of the video

    • @ArkansaDave1
      @ArkansaDave1 Рік тому +3

      @@Brownlightning1990 they said 4 auto not 4 hi, there is a difference.

    • @tallll70
      @tallll70 Рік тому

      @@joshraleigh101 I believe Alex on Autos stated it's constant minimum 25% to the front with TRX, maybe you seen it written somewhere

  • @9663mu
    @9663mu Рік тому +2

    Is everyone getting in shape now ? First Mr truck and now Roman looking like a Roman gladiator. Guys this ain’t easy from someone who lost 75 lbs himself. Good 👍

    • @jml9550
      @jml9550 Рік тому +1

      Tell me about it. 50Yo and 20 lbs overweight……your body will tell you to do so or else.

  • @cmcb7230
    @cmcb7230 Рік тому

    I have also have a truck with a 5.2v8, 4x4 that gets about 13-15mpg. But I paid less than $1k for it, so it’s not a problem for me!

  • @ericmoore9007
    @ericmoore9007 Рік тому +36

    Great truck but prices on these super trucks are unreasonable 😮

    • @bigmacmach1185
      @bigmacmach1185 Рік тому +8

      Yes ridiculous pricing. Their 2014 Raptor 6.2 cost 55k, which inflation adjusted is 69k....now only 9 year later this one cost 41k more even on inflation adjusted numbers?? Cmon, they continue to price themselves out of sales and this will come back on all of these manufacturers.

    • @plus790
      @plus790 Рік тому

      I own a Gen 1 6.2, and to be fair, the comparable base Gen 3 isn't all that far off that inflation adjustment. Cars and trucks in general are getting crazy, but you have to acknowledge that the R is a different animal.

    • @bigmacmach1185
      @bigmacmach1185 Рік тому

      @Adam Miller yea it does have the predator engine and more tech but these are trucks, cars(looking at you corvette) that the hard working person could get if they saved their money. Now, its only white collar dollars that can buy these.

    • @davidaix5771
      @davidaix5771 Рік тому

      ​@Adam Miller yeah it really is crazy and its not stopping I saw a 4Runner pro for over 80k

    • @bigmacmach1185
      @bigmacmach1185 Рік тому

      @David Aix that's beyond ridiculous, wow. Should be criminal.

  • @the_jarmel
    @the_jarmel Рік тому

    Have a beautiful SUNDAY EVERYONE ✌️ THANKS MICA'S 👏👏👏

  • @pablochacon40
    @pablochacon40 Рік тому +6

    The problem with the trx is that it’s full time 4wd so I think that’s why you guys have it on awd because if you leave it on 2wd it would be better on gas .

    • @guamazolopez6456
      @guamazolopez6456 Рік тому

      very true trx probably would’ve got more mpg

    • @MS-mr4zm
      @MS-mr4zm Рік тому

      Except dodge makes shit components so they can’t risk allowing you to run in 2wd only or else the rear diff/axles/trans would explore 😂😂😂😂 (truth)

  • @joshturley4986
    @joshturley4986 Рік тому +1

    Gen2 with the whipple tune gets you about the same mileage on 91 octane, but still has 180 less HP.

  • @JohnDiMartino
    @JohnDiMartino Рік тому +3

    If you did that entire route in 4A that would be at least a half a mpg difference as well. Once ont the highway the roads were clear so hopefully you took it out. Kudos for doing the mpg test in normal mode,all tests should be done that way.

    • @IGmeanwell
      @IGmeanwell Рік тому

      Not only that Roman was definitely driving faster than traffic, F150s immediately get less efficient once you get over 70. I bet if you were on the highway at 65-68 you would eek out 18-19mpg in 2wd.

  • @Danzilly
    @Danzilly Рік тому +8

    That's a beautiful truck! Sad I will never be able to afford one.

    • @sevynthdaye2863
      @sevynthdaye2863 Рік тому +2

      Dream big & manifest you’ll get what you want!!

    • @tallll70
      @tallll70 Рік тому

      it's most likely possible to rent with Turo to check it out and experience it

  • @lawrenceralph7481
    @lawrenceralph7481 Рік тому

    If you run around in this truck a thousand miles a month, it's fuel consumption might add $100 a month to your fuel bill.
    For some people that's a lot, but for a person who's paying $2,000 a month in capital payoff and insurance, it's just part of the enjoyment of owning this car.

  • @adammboyce
    @adammboyce Рік тому +2

    I would take 13.5 with the performance of a Raptor R. I have a Gen 2 and can't get 13 mpg after the engine failure/cam phaser replacement. Ford keeps saying nothing wrong with this.

  • @RickSwartwood
    @RickSwartwood Рік тому +1

    Great number in my opinion. My Gen 1 6.2 would get that number.

  • @stockey
    @stockey Рік тому +2

    The engine note is enhanced by the speakers.

  • @plus790
    @plus790 Рік тому

    At 0:40 it should have Tommy's voice over the 4 wheel drifting around the ranch.

  • @Malc664
    @Malc664 Рік тому +1

    How about testing fuel economy, 4wd auto versus 2wd. The difference will be interesting

  • @6bt_str86
    @6bt_str86 Рік тому

    Same mpg as my 02 LQ4 4x4 Yuke XL ... (but mine was a $1k and the headliner needs a razor knife trimming every 4vwks along with jute backing dust flying about at 65mph)

  • @mehryar.
    @mehryar. Рік тому

    Considering my Gen 1 on 37s doing 10 MPG, this is actually great.

  • @ronaldking1054
    @ronaldking1054 Рік тому

    Roman, just consider the rain as being a nice car rinse. I hope that makes you feel a little better.

  • @wayned3137
    @wayned3137 Рік тому +2

    My buddy’s trx gets around 5-6 mpg local here in NYC

    • @kenfldude
      @kenfldude Рік тому +1

      He must have it floored all the time. I average 10 with mine

    • @mikek5298
      @mikek5298 Рік тому

      Read the comment immediately below yours. Your ‘buddy’ is an idiot.

  • @alanyoung4102
    @alanyoung4102 Рік тому

    Awesome truck and for the performance I think it isn’t too bad!

  • @mikecarmean1676
    @mikecarmean1676 Рік тому +2

    Great review, awesome truck looks like a blast! Not that it really matters that much, but curious what was the average mph during the trip?

  • @selfcarefordudes
    @selfcarefordudes Рік тому +3

    I couldn’t imagine someone paying $35-50k more for a Raptor R over a TRX. I’d go TRX either way but seriously the price difference is crazy.

    • @BC08
      @BC08 Рік тому +3

      You do realize Raptor R’s only come fully optioned right? The only option is the moonroof.
      A fully loaded TRX is $108K

  • @Tony-hf9mv
    @Tony-hf9mv Рік тому +1

    Dang that is about the same as the new tundra but the R actually gives you power

  • @Toe_Knee_69
    @Toe_Knee_69 Рік тому +1

    Roughly same fuel economy as the gutless 2020 tundra I used to have 😅

  • @donleamon8653
    @donleamon8653 Рік тому

    Shit, regular is over $4.50 here in Phoenix. We’re now tied to CA since the NM refineries shut down. Sucks.

  • @gpilsitz1783
    @gpilsitz1783 Рік тому

    Don't step over the hose. I learned the hard way and tore two muscles in one shoulder.

  • @dash9680
    @dash9680 Рік тому

    Love you videos and I love that track

  • @todddoolittle4250
    @todddoolittle4250 Рік тому

    I own a TRX and filling it up with 93 octane doesn't bother me at all. This truck is so stupid, so rowdy and and so fun, you get every penny's worth back in sheer fun driving theme stupid thing. Literally every single mundane commute has my giggling like a little girl. It's that stupid fun.

  • @gadgetmantwincities
    @gadgetmantwincities Рік тому

    Just went to the auto show yesterday and there was no raptor R but they had 3 lightnings 😳🤯

  • @intensifier1346
    @intensifier1346 Рік тому +1

    I would pay $110k no problem. It’s that last $60k I have a problem with.

  • @jamessilvester4622
    @jamessilvester4622 Рік тому

    I have a trx on 37x13.5 18 BFGs and get 11mpg mixed 14mpg on hwy
    My lifted 2016 landcruiser on 35’s got worse MPGs
    If the the truck would go into 2wd only might squeeze 1 more mpg

  • @jamescharles8663
    @jamescharles8663 Рік тому

    Great video also that is one fantastic truck

  • @dor1tomcswagger69
    @dor1tomcswagger69 Рік тому +12

    If I owned this truck I'd prob be getting 6 mpg 😂

    • @abrahamyoder9175
      @abrahamyoder9175 Рік тому

      No kidding

    • @RockyNikita
      @RockyNikita Рік тому +2

      I've had a 9mpg tank with our 22' TRX.... lengthy/memorable off-road day with friends. The memories are well worth the cost. No one says "Wow Bill, glad we took the Camry Hybrid today!" or "Chad, so happy we decided to use hand paddles and not the gluttonous engines on your Pontoon boat!"

  • @andrewcrane6020
    @andrewcrane6020 Рік тому

    Better than expected.

  • @jeffk464
    @jeffk464 Рік тому +1

    I love the looks of the new Ranger Raptor but don't think I would be happy with the MPG's and it shouldn't be as bad as one of these. Maybe a 2.3L tremor package or Tacoma hybrid.

    • @302Mustang13
      @302Mustang13 Рік тому

      You don't buy any truck with off-road focused anything if you value mpgs. If you don't need it just get a regular version. The Ranger Tremor only gets 17 city 20 highway or something like that versus 20/24 for a regular 4wd version.

    • @jeffk464
      @jeffk464 Рік тому

      @@302Mustang13 Those offroad tires just wipe out mpg's I guess. 20/24 is fairly acceptable. I guess the only kinda sorta green offroad truck is the 4xe wrangler.

    • @canuckrunamuk23
      @canuckrunamuk23 Рік тому +1

      I drive very conservatively in my Ranger Tremor.....mostly highway and rural...after 2 years of ownership I'm consistently pulling 23mpg overall avg or 10L/100km
      I run 93 octane and expect a mild bump in the summer time. The truck is stock but I did change out the tires which aids the mileage greatly....dropped the M/T's for Goodrich Trail Terrains...they are sufficient for the back roads and mild trails I need to access.
      Great little truck

    • @302Mustang13
      @302Mustang13 Рік тому

      @@jeffk464 the tires definitely do. Had buddy do something similar with his Sierra and he lost 4 mpg or so. If you live somewhere like Alaska or something remote like that I could see the point having them. Scoring points on your daily just to go around your suburban life and not even even go hunting or anything is laughable.

    • @302Mustang13
      @302Mustang13 Рік тому +1

      @@canuckrunamuk23 my dad has one of the new Ranger, an STX. I think he averages 23 or so mpg overall and maybe better.

  • @chadwood4296
    @chadwood4296 Рік тому +1

    My 2006 Jeep Wrangler 4.0 on 33" tires gets 12.3 mpg / 100+ HP 😅😂

  • @mscottlawrence2037
    @mscottlawrence2037 Рік тому

    Nobody is buying this for mpg, but comparing it to its competitors is always fun

  • @douglasvieira1990dv
    @douglasvieira1990dv Рік тому

    thank you for the content, but why are we just staring at the center console

  • @thongtran37
    @thongtran37 Рік тому +2

    People who can afford the truck are 99% parked in the garage so MPG is not a corncern...hehehe

  • @robertyoung8289
    @robertyoung8289 Рік тому +2

    That's only two less than my 6100lb Tacoma TRD PRO. 🙄

  • @eagleeye2952
    @eagleeye2952 Рік тому

    Does it have a high compression engine? If not, that high octane fuel is the incorrect fuel choice...

  • @JogBird
    @JogBird Рік тому +1

    13.5 mpg is a feature of these trucks

  • @CrisAnderson27
    @CrisAnderson27 11 місяців тому

    "If you want more horsepower and a slower truck, buy the Hemi" lol.

  • @ss442es
    @ss442es Рік тому

    I mistakenly thought Ford had a better idea and to me, that would include a better fuel economy. Maybe Ford needs to go back to the future and take a second look at the second-gen raptor engines.

  • @WebVulture
    @WebVulture Рік тому +2

    Smiles per gallon...😊

  • @nathanielmoore87
    @nathanielmoore87 Рік тому +1

    Better MPGs than I thought... At some point, I believe Ford is going to get the Lightning and Raptor together and make a love child. An electric Raptor would be interesting and plenty quick, but it's no V8.

    • @ALMX5DP
      @ALMX5DP Рік тому

      Isn’t it rated at 15mpg highway from the EPA?

    • @RockyNikita
      @RockyNikita Рік тому

      2014 Raptor (added Whipple supercharger) was iconic, 2017 was pathetic and sounded like a Dyson vacuum. 22' TRX daily with SLP's replacing factory resonators is perfection. Point is the V8 experience/sound/aura is organic... like an iconic rollercoaster in which the sounds of the track, wood trestles, etc. combine into an emotional experience. Something EV vehicles with their clinical/appliance aura will never replace. TRX was down for a month awaiting a new radiator, ahem 'Flower Child' era neighbors commented "Oh finally, you sold 'that thing' (seeing the rental/loaner). Glad it's back for the early morning cold starts.... if you don't get an HOA letter sometime in life, you're doing it wrong : )

  • @jakeruiz5062
    @jakeruiz5062 Рік тому

    I thought TFL Truck was Andres Spot ? Mr Truck and the Portly dude ? Why are you guys there ?

  • @stevend3753
    @stevend3753 Рік тому

    "Terrible gas mileage?"
    I feel like this one of those Captain Obvious moments.

  • @davidkendall6801
    @davidkendall6801 Рік тому +1

    I'd never worry about might if I owned one. If you can't afford gas, you bought the wrong vehicle.

  • @travise8008
    @travise8008 Рік тому

    I want to see you dyno the two trucks

  • @aggiewoodie
    @aggiewoodie Рік тому

    GD. Just filled up with 91 in TX for $3.79.

  • @bobdennis4801
    @bobdennis4801 Рік тому +2

    Guessing those 37s don’t help the fuel mileage at all. Switch to the 35s that the stock Raptor and the TRX have and you would be closer to the 16 the stock Raptor got I’m guessing.

    • @Steve-yr5vi
      @Steve-yr5vi Рік тому

      The 3.5 Raptor can exceed 20 mpg if drive reasonably, throttle house reported 22, it is after all the same engine as the run of the mill F150's that manage 24. Drive the speed limit you'd be surprised what those turbo's will deliver.

    • @CallsignVega
      @CallsignVega Рік тому +2

      @@Steve-yr5vi I have a 37" 2023 Raptor 3.5 and you'd be reaaaaaaaaaly hard pressed to get 20 MPG out of one. I'm talking maybe going 45 MPH with hardly any stops on some back road. My average over 3K miles is 16 MPG.

  • @NatesHomeTours
    @NatesHomeTours Рік тому

    Typical Ford, I drove a Ranger for a week, had to turn off all the driver assit crap. It made me look like a drunk driver swerving back and forth. Kept telling me I was about to get in an accident even when sitting stopped at a light, when a semi would drive by. Adaptive cruise would nearly rearend a vehicle then slam on the brakes slow down then accelerate and do it all over again. It was scary to drive that Ranger with all the Assist enabled.

  • @karnrandhawa5731
    @karnrandhawa5731 Рік тому

    Why is it I never see any of these 100k trucks meant to be offroad ever on the trails only highways and malls ?

  • @jessaphillips2846
    @jessaphillips2846 Рік тому

    Curious what the MPG on a Raptor 37 is I would imagine somewhere between the base Raptor and the R

    • @harrytapley1872
      @harrytapley1872 Рік тому

      I have a 2023 3.5 with the 37's, I have about 2500 miles on it, and so far it's around 13-15 in town and pushes 17 on road trips with my light driving style ( old man) and occasional drag races in town.

  • @westeed1
    @westeed1 Рік тому

    Does it have the drive modes? We’re y’all in normal or did u try eco? Is there even “Eco” mode on that? 😂

  • @malcolmn.5222
    @malcolmn.5222 Рік тому +2

    Most people who buy these most likely have other more fuel efficient cars to drive along side this

  • @kkamp0528
    @kkamp0528 Рік тому +1

    2-wheel drive should of been used plus 37in tires vs 35 on the trx

    • @tallll70
      @tallll70 Рік тому

      trx is actually full time awd so it's ok, both about same set

  • @glaffoon1
    @glaffoon1 Рік тому +1

    Who cares what your fuel economy is. If you are driving a TRX or a Raptor, you don’t care about fuel economy.
    But the real thing is. I’d much rather have the TRX than a Ford anything.
    The real question is, where is the Chevrolet/GMC performance truck. Is there such a thing?

  • @kc0lif
    @kc0lif Рік тому

    pretty efficient vehicle

  • @jefferp
    @jefferp Рік тому

    It would be interesting to know the demands on the engine to maintain say, 70 mph on the road. 38 hp, 100 hp? How often are those powerhouse vehicles ever at their full potential? Without the nannies, you could probably spin the tires at 100 mph with the torque available😁.

    • @YerBoyTroy
      @YerBoyTroy Рік тому

      Probably more than you think. The aerodynamics are pretty poor on this vehicle (lifted wide-body trucks are literally bricks flying in the wind), it would probably lose speed very quickly when off the throttle. Not to mention those massive AT tires would have a large rolling resistance coefficient plus the large amount of static weight added from their rotating mass . At 70 MPH, the resistant forces acting against this vehicle would be much greater than the forces acting against a regular f150 at the same speed. So this vehicle would need more output to maintain that speed. All that being said, I don't think you could spin tires in a vehicle like this at 100 mph. You'd need less weight , less grip and noticeably more horse power 😅

    • @jefferp
      @jefferp Рік тому +1

      @@YerBoyTroy at this stage of my life, I’m finding out that I’m wrong about almost everything. The plus side, it does bring out a lot of information from others. 😉

  • @johnandersonjjr
    @johnandersonjjr Рік тому

    Too bad about no column shift,a dorky dial?

  • @s.a.i.v
    @s.a.i.v Рік тому

    Are we starting to see the upside of manufacturer requiring to build eco electric cars, so that they can continue to build us these powerhouses?

  • @ryansheard8092
    @ryansheard8092 Рік тому

    It's an awesome truck and 13.5 MPG isn't bad!And to the people complaining about it's cost.....it's not supposed to be attainable for the average person. It's a "super" truck. Enjoy watching videos of it and dream/figure out how to make residual income to afford it. Not everything in life should be accessible to all.

  • @craig8638
    @craig8638 Рік тому +1

    I’ll stick with my Lightning. Just as quick, better suspension for commuting and it a little cheaper to buy.

  • @derrickschultz6871
    @derrickschultz6871 Рік тому

    13.5 is pretty good

  • @mus_xr4653
    @mus_xr4653 Рік тому +1

    the trx was on 35s and the raptor is on 37s

  • @davidaix5771
    @davidaix5771 Рік тому

    Fuel mileage is the least of anyone's concern especially when buying something like this

  • @CRICRICTH
    @CRICRICTH Рік тому +5

    It's not about MPG. 😂 It's about Smiles per gallon.

  • @spartanchirho
    @spartanchirho Рік тому

    85 here in MT is 3.05/gln

  • @jeffk464
    @jeffk464 Рік тому +1

    The engineering explained guy said DO NOT reduce octane because you are at higher elevations.

  • @michaelcschmitt
    @michaelcschmitt Рік тому

    What would you expect, it was never meant to be a Prius.

  • @fabulousoffroaddesigns5080
    @fabulousoffroaddesigns5080 Рік тому

    Not sure I believe Ford loses by 2 HP in reality. The Ford wins the drag race on 37" tires. They have a tendency to sand bag their numbers.

  • @gregferris9378
    @gregferris9378 Рік тому

    I would be more concerned about distance between fuel stops. Give me a big gas tank and I'll be happy.

  • @marcleibovic6879
    @marcleibovic6879 Рік тому +1

    13.5 mpg is worse than my first car 77 Pontiac Grand Prix

    • @BullittKid08
      @BullittKid08 Рік тому +2

      13.5 mpg while only having between 135 and 180 horsepower depending if it was a 301ci or 400ci

  • @codyrobinson22
    @codyrobinson22 Рік тому +1

    Or you can just add a K&N air filter to the Raptor R & get more than 2 hp more beating the TRX lol

  • @EastCoastFrank
    @EastCoastFrank Рік тому +4

    Anyone wanting or driving super trucks do not care about fuel mileage let’s be honest lol

    • @macbook802
      @macbook802 Рік тому +3

      They are not smart enough to think about fuel economy

    • @EastCoastFrank
      @EastCoastFrank Рік тому +1

      @@macbook802 I’ll take that lol 😂 I may not be smart but I drive with a hell of a big smile on my face!!!!! 😂

    • @macbook802
      @macbook802 Рік тому +2

      @@EastCoastFrank I will admit the raptor is a smooth riding truck but as far as capabilities go, I can do anything that 95% of drivers have ever done in any raptor with a 4 cylinder Chevy, Except acceleration of course.

    • @EastCoastFrank
      @EastCoastFrank Рік тому

      @@macbook802 agreed! There’s no denying the capability of the raptor in any form. I don’t own one personally. I have a 2022 trail boss midnight edition with the 6.2 lol I never think fuel mileage. I fill my tank and smile like hell when I hear the roar lol 😂

    • @macbook802
      @macbook802 Рік тому +1

      @@EastCoastFrank I wonder how a fancy, high mpg, soft suspension truck would sell, like a platinum with 17" rims with more of a street tire, with the standard length a arms, but the raptor soft fox suspension.

  • @stephenrussell9518
    @stephenrussell9518 Рік тому

    If you want and can afford this truck you probably don’t care about fuel mileage in the first place. Or you would be buying the maverick if you cared or something similar for the mpg. I’d take the Raptor or TRX …..

  • @goneoutside1011
    @goneoutside1011 Рік тому +1

    I don’t think you buy these type of trucks for the mpg. And they are over priced like Superman is over powered

  • @DuaneCaldwell
    @DuaneCaldwell Рік тому

    Incredible power, but horrid fuel economy for everyday living. If you don't blink at the price tag for that Raptor R, you won't care about the gas mileage. That is a small percentage of real world owners.
    As for the automated driving "aids," I think they are more of a PITA to use due to tech glitches, and they're certainly more of a hazard due to drivers using them to be more distracted. Look at the accidents involving Tesla's "autopilot" mode that isn't ready to be an "autopilot." The tech needs much more development and refinement.

  • @jakes5530
    @jakes5530 Рік тому +1

    Ride is supposed to be more comfortable than the TRX according to all the reviews. Obviously gas mileage is irrelevant in a 700 hp supercharged V8. Regardless even at 10 mpg, can still go further than a R1T or Hummer EV truck

    • @ronaldking1054
      @ronaldking1054 Рік тому

      Yes, but the Hummer EV would require 2 gallons of gas to do what 5 does in the F-150. That means the Hummer would require $10.11 to do what the F-150 requires $20.95 to do.
      Figure for Hummer is $.15 / kW with the EPA figure of 33.7 kW / gallon of gasoline and the $4.19 that they paid for the premium fuel.

    • @mikeadamson4605
      @mikeadamson4605 Рік тому

      @@ronaldking1054 While I understand your point, what is your time worth? The Raptor would have a full tank in less than 10 minutes. How many hours for the Hummer EV to have full batteries?

    • @ronaldking1054
      @ronaldking1054 Рік тому

      @@mikeadamson4605 No, it won't because you had to drive to the station. I don't. I also do not need to wait at the station for 10 minutes at all as I can be at my home relaxing while you had to drive there.

    • @ronaldking1054
      @ronaldking1054 Рік тому

      @@mikeadamson4605 I have never had to fill the tank of a car more than once a week, and the range on that car was not more 250 miles. The typical American does not drive how you claim they do.

    • @ryansheard8092
      @ryansheard8092 Рік тому

      ​@Ronald King sure they do. Im a typical American and I drive from Houston to Dallas regularly. Furthermore, it's about the ability to. A family wants a vehicle where 4 people plus their stuff can be packed in and go on vacation to somewhere more than 250 miles in. People regularly drive a LONG way for vacation and don't want to be adding hours to an already long trip. I'm not against EVs but it's ignorant to suggest they are as convenient as ICE vehicles.

  • @stevewilcoxson7173
    @stevewilcoxson7173 Рік тому +1

    Same mpg as my old Jeep Wrangler 🤔

    • @tallll70
      @tallll70 Рік тому

      How old? JK with v6 pentastar? I had good mpg empty, but both 3.7 F150 and the Pentastar goes down to 13s when loaded with tools

    • @stevewilcoxson7173
      @stevewilcoxson7173 Рік тому

      @@tallll70 1997 Jeep Wrangler 4WD 4.0 L, 6 cyl, Automatic 13mpg

  • @colin55594
    @colin55594 Рік тому

    Didn't know 85 existed

  • @drewelliott9062
    @drewelliott9062 Рік тому

    I don't think anyone is buying a TRX or a Raptor R to save money on fuel.

  • @clintwestwood2731
    @clintwestwood2731 Рік тому

    Is there anybody in America that would’ve bought a Ford raptor for its touted fuel mileage? The whole idea is absurd.