Це відео не доступне.
Перепрошуємо.

3 MINUTES AGO: Boeing 737 MAX is in BIG Trouble! (again)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 7 лис 2023
  • The Boeing 737 MAX was meant to be Boeing’s modernisation of their highly successful 737 line. But ever since its maiden flight in January 2016, the Boeing 737 MAX, despite its relative successes, has looked like it can’t catch a single break. And that’s because after the mass-grounding of the aircraft in 2019 it finally looked like the comeback was on. But they’ve instead been beset with a new set of issues which could threaten the success of the line going forward. And here’s the crazy thing, Boeing might be more at fault than you think.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 79

  • @thailandrose2603
    @thailandrose2603 6 місяців тому +2

    What can Boeing do to resolve the 636 crises - Simple: Recall the entire series.

  • @donpercent
    @donpercent 7 місяців тому +2

    Don't ever fly on this plane and if you do, pray.

    • @mach16yes
      @mach16yes 7 місяців тому

      ah yes another brain dead guy

  • @robertpartington1383
    @robertpartington1383 8 місяців тому +7

    The plural of aircraft is aircraft, not aircrafts

  • @davidhall7744
    @davidhall7744 9 місяців тому +9

    I will never fly in a 737 again.

    • @JayJayAviation
      @JayJayAviation 8 місяців тому

      Why exactly?

    • @nickolliver3021
      @nickolliver3021 8 місяців тому

      tell that to boeing

    • @hamms35
      @hamms35 7 місяців тому

      Flying nowadays sucks in any commercial jet.

    • @stuartlee6622
      @stuartlee6622 7 місяців тому

      I now fly Delta. They use Airbus.

    • @JayJayAviation
      @JayJayAviation 7 місяців тому

      @@stuartlee6622 they use Boeing 737s, 757s and 767s

  • @bobhoffman8041
    @bobhoffman8041 7 місяців тому +3

    Michael O'Leary of Ryanair will have a melt down regards the latest Max issue with the Alaska door blow out. They are Europes biggest and the worlds 3rd biggest 737 customer. He will have to now consider bringing in the Airbus equivalent.

    • @EuropeanRailfanAlt
      @EuropeanRailfanAlt 7 місяців тому +1

      The best thing they can do is order A320neos for their subsidiary Lauda - which already operates A320s.

    • @mrrolandlawrence
      @mrrolandlawrence 6 місяців тому

      hes said that he may swap to airbus if its grounded again. i dont see this as being a long grounding. i also dont see them checking anything else. the FAA could actually interview the whistleblowers who were sacked prior and ask what other areas to check that may have had faked QC's. but that wont be happening.

  • @rockerobertson4002
    @rockerobertson4002 7 місяців тому +1

    in bigger trouble now. Depressurization at altitude, door blows out..

  • @PeterNGloor
    @PeterNGloor 8 місяців тому +1

    why did you insert so many 787 video clips?

  • @alanwood4968
    @alanwood4968 9 місяців тому +6

    This is the finish of boeing poorly made to many short cuts who wants to fly in them. Its the old story short cuts to make more money.

    • @nickolliver3021
      @nickolliver3021 8 місяців тому

      How is this the finish of Boeing? How is this issue related to "too many short cuts who want to fly in them". How is it the old story "Short cuts to make more money"?

    • @douginorlando6260
      @douginorlando6260 8 місяців тому

      The CEO’s $60 million golden parachute money had to come from somewhere. Why not make customers pay with their blood?

  • @jcd3869
    @jcd3869 7 місяців тому

    After this video boeing just announced that rudder bolts were "hand loose" on two 737 Max's. Now EVERY max must be inspected. Airlines have only just started to publish their inspection schedules and it will take TIME! I would not fly on a max until EVERY plane is inspected! One roach means tons more.......be careful you have a choice do your homework.

  • @mac6746
    @mac6746 6 місяців тому

    It's really in trouble now after what happened a couple days ago😂😂😂 thank God nobody got hurt

  • @clarktrent8952
    @clarktrent8952 7 місяців тому

    ...and in the spirit of robertpartington1383's post: Boeing IS, and NOT Boeing are! There is only one Boeing, *not* Boeings or multiple people and companies named Boeing

  • @heingysen9875
    @heingysen9875 8 місяців тому +6

    Airbus and Comac are laughing !

  • @eddies6977
    @eddies6977 7 місяців тому

    @2:48 to 2:53 What is that hanging off the tip of the rudder? Seriously! I've never seen anything like that before. Then there's a really good shot of it @9:04.

    • @lynnleeting9285
      @lynnleeting9285 6 місяців тому

      Ngl im prob very wrong but to me THAT LOOKS LIKE A FUELER (midair refuel reciever thingy)

    • @eddies6977
      @eddies6977 6 місяців тому

      @@lynnleeting9285 You're right, it looks like a mini refueling drogue but I think we can safely rule that out. It must be some kind of sensor, I'm guessing.

  • @DarrenChilvers
    @DarrenChilvers 9 місяців тому +3

    If I owned an airline I wud be cancelling orders and returning Boeing aircraft

    • @JayJayAviation
      @JayJayAviation 8 місяців тому +5

      I see why you don’t own an airline

    • @DarrenChilvers
      @DarrenChilvers 8 місяців тому +3

      @@JayJayAviation ALL BECAUSE I have more faith in Airbus than I do Boeing with their recent record,

    • @JayJayAviation
      @JayJayAviation 8 місяців тому

      @@DarrenChilvers fair

    • @kingdivo9210
      @kingdivo9210 8 місяців тому +1

      Boeing is still better lmao

    • @JayJayAviation
      @JayJayAviation 8 місяців тому +1

      @@kingdivo9210 in what way? Coming from someone who personally prefers Boeing

  • @davidmontville4885
    @davidmontville4885 8 місяців тому

    3:29 WW an aviation expert, eh? The plural of aircraft is ..... aircraft.

  • @DarrenChilvers
    @DarrenChilvers 8 місяців тому +1

    @JayJayAviatjon you seem to have issue's with anyone's comments not in boeings favour ! Do you wofk for boeing ? People are aloud there thoughts and opinions weather for or against

    • @nickolliver3021
      @nickolliver3021 8 місяців тому

      Why should you believe jays comments are not in Boeings favour? perhaps do you work for Airbus because you rely on airbus record than Boeings yet what they have done to amend their record has made them more trustworthy? Perhaps he touched your beloved bubble of Boeing hatred and hence why your airbus bubble love grew bigger lmao!

  • @MrCaptainDietrich
    @MrCaptainDietrich 8 місяців тому

    IS AIRBUS saver then boeing

    • @Imk946AO
      @Imk946AO 7 місяців тому

      You mean safer?

  • @carlosezquerro1694
    @carlosezquerro1694 9 місяців тому +16

    I try to avoid flying in Boeing !

    • @ajmillendez478
      @ajmillendez478 9 місяців тому

      I'm from the Philippines, and I haven't flown In a plane because I'm just 17, so my biggest dream is to fly inside a Boeing 777-300 ER.
      Which Philippine Airlines Has.

    • @JayJayAviation
      @JayJayAviation 8 місяців тому +1

      They wouldn’t be flying if they weren’t safe, ESPECIALLY after what happened

    • @nickolliver3021
      @nickolliver3021 8 місяців тому

      Why?

    • @krethmckee6726
      @krethmckee6726 7 місяців тому

      I hate flying in anything made by airbus.

    • @JayJayAviation
      @JayJayAviation 7 місяців тому

      @@krethmckee6726 why?

  • @terrygolden7726
    @terrygolden7726 7 місяців тому

    No coolie sourcing to a $9 / hr coie with no stick time is whg they nearly bm co.

  • @FatManDoubleZero
    @FatManDoubleZero 7 місяців тому +1

    Personally, I think the Boeing 737 MAX lineup is CRAP and should have been SCRAPPED instead of using a BAND-AID-FIX sloppy-engineered "RUBE GOLDBERG DESIGN."

  • @yunowot
    @yunowot 6 місяців тому

    Pratting about with people's lives is not funny: cancel the lot and put the entire corporation into forced shutdow.

  • @iEvoke
    @iEvoke 7 місяців тому

    Boeing 💀

  • @ajmillendez478
    @ajmillendez478 9 місяців тому +1

    The 737 design, not perfect but versatile design.
    Idk even though the 737 Max 8's that crash have terrible crashes, it mostly been in fault by Boeing & the Two airlines maintenance practices.
    And also now the 737 Max is affected by Supply Chain Issues. And Boeing'd Terrible Management. Not like in the 2000's because at that time they are praised by the 777 in the late 90's and the 787 by the mid 2000's.

  • @dolfin98
    @dolfin98 8 місяців тому

    THE USUAL C RAP GET A LIFE

  • @ferrariguy6389
    @ferrariguy6389 9 місяців тому +5

    Get your facts straight. The Alaska Airlines 737 with the collapsed left main landing gear was 516AS. It's NOT a Max. It's a -800 NG. You can always tell a max by the zig-zag pattern on the back of the engine cowel.

    • @WingedWorldAviation
      @WingedWorldAviation  9 місяців тому +2

      Thanks for pointing this out and you're totally right!

    • @JayJayAviation
      @JayJayAviation 8 місяців тому +1

      @@WingedWorldAviationgood job for owning up to it! I don’t see this often on UA-cam and respect you a lot for it

    • @Blank00
      @Blank00 8 місяців тому

      And there is no proof that the trunnion pin was caused by a design/manufacturing fault. The NG has been in service for 25 years and the failure rate of trunnion pins is not significantly greater than industry average

    • @michaelscott5653
      @michaelscott5653 7 місяців тому

      Well the 737 MAX 9 just had a door plug blow out mid flight, so...🤨

    • @JayJayAviation
      @JayJayAviation 7 місяців тому

      @@michaelscott5653 So what? How is that relevant to anything here?