How to investigate conscious reality, with Samuel Devis from The Socratic Sessions

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 6 жов 2024
  • Check out more interviews by Samuel at The Socratic Sessions: • Introductions | Samuel... .
    More about my counting argument: worldviewdesig...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 16

  • @Jamric-gr8gr
    @Jamric-gr8gr 7 місяців тому +3

    Dr. Josh is back!

  • @ReverendDr.Thomas
    @ReverendDr.Thomas 7 місяців тому +2

    There are THREE possible explanations for life/existence:
    1. The external, objective universe is the sole REALITY.
    2. The perceiver (that is, the subject) of the objective universe is the sole REALITY.
    3. This existence is a virtual REALITY, similar to the premise of “The Matrix” films.
    Which do YOU believe to be the most plausible explanation?

    • @TheWorldTeacher
      @TheWorldTeacher 7 місяців тому +6

      None of the above. 😊

    • @CollectionOfTheTimeless
      @CollectionOfTheTimeless 4 місяці тому

      Why do we want an explanation for life or existence? It is not something we can measure anyway. Our main instrument for inquiry in general is thought, which is limited to knowledge, experience, and memory. Maybe there is an other instrument of inquiry, Observation, which is not bound by these limitations. But the twist here is that we cannot really control observation or force it. But what I'm proposing is, finding a place for thought in the mind, where it no longer interferes with Observation.
      And I guess this could be called ''self-inquiry''. As the "me" that we have taken as for identity, comes and places a crucial part in our observations. "Me" and "my anxieties", create a 2 conflicts instead of 1, and therefore make us blind to the fact that there is only that 'which is'.

  • @theseeker4308
    @theseeker4308 5 місяців тому

    Here after listened to you in Mohammad Hijab's yt channel, contingency argument is cool

  • @famiahamid
    @famiahamid 6 місяців тому

    @WorldviewDesignChannel Dr. Rasmussen, what’s your opinion on physicist Carl Rovelli saying there is no objective reality (and that there’s no shared moment of time across the universe?)

    • @ReverendDr.Thomas
      @ReverendDr.Thomas 4 місяці тому

      He would need to define his terms first.
      It seems he doesn't understand the subject-object duality.

  • @abelovedchildofgod7383
    @abelovedchildofgod7383 7 місяців тому

    Consciousness might be the fundamental reality after all

    • @ReverendDr.Thomas
      @ReverendDr.Thomas 4 місяці тому

      From where did this fundamental consciousness originate?

    • @ryanashfyre464
      @ryanashfyre464 4 місяці тому

      @@ReverendDr.Thomas Nowhere. That's what it means to be fundamental. Eventually you have to grant at least one thing as having ontological primacy - the one thing that it itself cannot be explained in terms of anything else.

    • @ReverendDr.Thomas
      @ReverendDr.Thomas 4 місяці тому

      @@ryanashfyre464
      🐟 02. A BRIEF SYNOPSIS OF “LIFE”:
      Everything, both perceptible and imperceptible - that is, any gross or subtle OBJECT within the material universe which can possibly be perceived with the cognitive faculties, plus the SUBJECT (the observer of all phenomena) - is to what most persons generally refer when they use the term “God”, since they usually conceive of the Primeval Creator as being the Perfect Person, and “God” (capitalized) is a personal epithet of the Unconditioned Absolute. However, this anthropomorphized conception of The Absolute is a fictional character of divers mythologies.
      According to most every enlightened sage in the history of this planet, the Ultimate Reality is, far more logically, Absolutely NOTHING, or conversely, Absolutely EVERYTHING - otherwise called “The Tao”, “The Great Spirit”, “Brahman”, “Pure Consciousness”, “Eternal Awareness”, “Independent Existence”, “The Ground of All Being”, “Uncaused Nature”, “The Undifferentiated Substratum of Reality”, “The Unified Field”, et cetera - yet, as alluded to above, inaccurately referred to as a personal deity by the masses (e.g. “God”, “Allah”, “Yahweh”, “Bhagavan”, etc.).
      In other words, rather than the Supreme Truth being a separate, Blissful, Supra-Conscious Being (The Godhead Himself or The Goddess), Ultimate Reality is Eternal-Existence Limitless-Awareness Unconditional-Peace ITSELF. That which can be perceived, can not be perceiving!
      Because the Unmanifested Absolute is infinite creative potentiality, “it” actualizes as EVERYTHING, in the form of ephemeral, cyclical universes. In the case of our particular universe, we reside in a cosmos consisting of space-time, matter and energy, without, of course, neglecting the most fundamental dimension of existence (i.e. conscious awareness - although, “it” is, being the subject, by literal definition, non-existent).
      Just as a knife cannot cut itself, nor the mind comprehend itself, nor the eyes see themselves, The Absolute cannot know Itself (or at least objectively EXPERIENCE Itself), and so, has manifested this phenomenal universe within Itself for the purpose of experiencing Itself, particularly through the lives of self-aware beings, such as we sophisticated humans. Therefore, this world of duality is really just a play of consciousness within Consciousness, in the same way that a dream is a person's sleeping narrative set within the life-story of an “awakened” individual.
      APPARENTLY, this universe, composed of “mind and matter”, was created with the primal act (the so-called “Big Bang”), which started, supposedly, as a minute, slightly uneven ball of light, which in turn, was instigated, ultimately, by Extra-Temporal Supra-Consciousness. From that first deed, every motion or action that has ever occurred has been a direct (though, almost exclusively, an indirect) result of it.
      Just as all the extant energy in the universe was once contained within the inchoate singularity, Infinite Consciousness was NECESSARILY present at the beginning of the universe, and is in no way an epiphenomenon of a neural network. Discrete consciousness, on the other hand, is entirely dependent on the neurological faculty of individual animals (the more highly-evolved the species, the greater its cognitive abilities).
      “Sarvam khalvidam brahma” (a Sanskrit maxim from the “Chandogya Upanishad”, meaning “all this is indeed Brahman” or “everything is the Universal Self alone”). There is NAUGHT but Eternal Being, Conscious Awareness, Causeless Peace - and you are, quintessentially, that!
      This “Theory of Everything” can be more succinctly expressed by the mathematical equation: E=A͚ (Everything is Infinite Awareness).
      HUMANS are essentially this Eternally-Aware-Peace, acting through an extraordinarily-complex biological organism, comprised of the eight rudimentary elements - pseudo-ego (the assumed sense of self), intellect, mind, solids, liquids, gases, heat (fire), and ether (three-dimensional space). When one peers into a mirror, one doesn't normally mistake the reflected image to be one's real self, yet that is how we humans conventionally view our ever-mutating form. We are, rather, in a fundamental sense, that which witnesses all transitory appearances.
      Everything which can be presently perceived, both tangible and immaterial, including we human beings, is a culmination of that primary manifestation. That is the most accurate and rational explanation for “karma” - everything was preordained from the initial spark, and every action since has unfolded as it was predestined in ETERNITY, via an ever-forward-moving trajectory. The notion of retributive (“tit-for-tat”) karma is just that - an unverified notion. Likewise, the idea of a distinct, reincarnating “soul” or “spirit” is largely a fallacious belief.
      Whatever state in which we currently find ourselves, is the result of two factors - our genetic make-up at conception and our present-life conditioning (which may include mutating genetic code). Every choice ever made by every human and non-human animal was determined by those two factors ALONE. Therefore, free-will is purely illusory, despite what most believe. Chapter 11 insightfully demonstrates this truism.
      As a consequence of residing within this dualistic universe, we experience a lifelong series of fluctuating, transient pleasures and pains, which can take the form of physical, emotional, and/or financial pleasure or pain. Surprisingly to most, suffering and pain are NOT synonymous.
      Suffering is due to a false sense of personal agency - the belief that one is a separate, independent author of one’s thoughts, emotions, and deeds, and that, likewise, other persons are autonomous agents, with complete volition to act, think, and feel as they wish. Another way of stating the same concept is as follows: suffering is due to the intellect being unwilling to accept life as it manifests moment by moment.
      There are five SYMPTOMS of suffering, all of which are psychological in nature:
      1. Guilt
      2. Blame
      3. Pride
      4. Anxiety
      5. Regrets about the past and expectations for the future
      These types of suffering are the result of not properly understanding what was explained above - that life is a series of happenings and NOT caused by the individual living beings. No living creature, including Homo sapiens, has personal free-will. There is only the Universal, Divine Will at play, acting through every body, to which William Shakespeare famously alluded when he scribed “All the world's a stage, and all the men and women merely players.”
      The human organism is essentially a biopsychological machine, comprised of the five gross material elements (which can be perceived with the five senses) and the three subtle material elements (the three levels of cognition, which consist of abstract thought objects), listed above.
      Cont...

  • @veracityhill
    @veracityhill 7 місяців тому

    Empty bookshelves is all I can see. My focus. Is. Diverted.

  • @VictorReborn
    @VictorReborn 7 місяців тому

    Dr. Josh I know you’re not a UA-camr but you could get so much more views if you would just make some better thumbnails.
    And hopefully with the views more people will also come to Christ

  • @HaloDoga
    @HaloDoga 2 місяці тому +2

    Boooooo

  • @HaloDoga
    @HaloDoga 2 місяці тому +2

    I hate Josh