If Zaytuna keeps uploading these type of clips , in few years it’ll have millions of students all over the world, we were not taught how to even think at school, we live a biased manipulative lives.
Well that's basically more of an etymological approach, which is in fact a logical way of figuring out how the world is. Language serves a number of functions, and by knowing what words mean, it helps you better understand the world in my opinion. Also increases your intellect in general, as well as your vocabulairy, obviously. But knowing what words mean, what their origins are, why certain words were used for certain concepts or objects, events or activities.. all of it increases you in knowledge, which really is distinguishing truth from error. I like one definition of knowledge, as given by a muslim scholar when interviewed by Hamza Yusuf actually. The man said that knowledge is putting all things in their proper places. That's really what it comes down to. He gave the example of what Hamza talks about in this clip, which is the classification of living organisms. Putting things where they belong, where they are; knowing their places. Coining valid similitudes is actually part of logic. So if democracy is a Species, then the Genus could be government, with a society being the Family and the individual being the Order. I wish I could be there, in Hamza Yusuf's classes. I never really had a teacher that impressed me, or made a significant impact on me. I envy the students in these classes. I used to listen a lot to Hamza Yusuf, he taught me a lot about a lot of things really. May Allah increase us all in knowledge, wisdom and good deeds, and may Allah bless Hamza Yusuf and his family; Allahuma ameen.
XaeeD •••• Hamza Yusuf seems to be a master of disinformation .What he puts out in these videos to his students is next to useless . Why doesn't he tell them that the science of Logic hasn't been taught in our State controlled public schools for more than a century? The Underground History of American Education by John Gatto••••• Answer: Because people who know how to logically evaluate an argument are very hard to lie to .
@@williamspringer9447 yes Mr. Dajjal that's definitely a very sound logical argument you've made there. I think you need more training at Dajjal University, Fox News
@@williamspringer9447 I don't know why he doesn't tell that. He probably should add that here or there but I believe he too has been played into the idea of the left. America is inherently problematic. Which isn't true. But certainly his has little purpose ever telling both, about the underground history or the problems of America. However, that isn't an etymological approach but more of a word play idea which I believe Wittengenstien really thought about. Besides perhaps to you don't see that he is after all a theologian and not a political scientist. His main purpose I would thus presume is spreading what he calls "Normative Islam". But I can't at all say that he is a master of disinformation.
@@ihsankamil6279 Well it is logical if that is the only system. If the only topic was America. If he was a political scientist. However, him playing into the lefts' identities politics of white old men suggests that he didn't like what America was but I would beg to differ that he didn't claim either a negative perspective or a positive one. Afterall, he is American and the natural disposition of man being conservative certainly he ought to be a conservative one. What he in the end conserves however, is Sunni Islam.
Cynthia Sue Larson •••• It would have been better if he actually have us some information about how to use the science of Logic to understand the world . But slaves are not meant to understand the science of Logic .
Abdul Wahab paracha ••••• This guy taught you nothing about how to reason logically . Slaves are not meant to understand the science of Logic. That is why the science of Logic hasn't been taught in our State controlled public schools for more than a century . The Underground History of American Education by John Gatto
Hamza Yusuf is my greatest teacher of insight. I am tremendously in debt to him, I resect him and love him a lot. may Allah grants his moqam higher and higher.
fahim faysal ••• And yet in this video he taught us virtually nothing about how to use the science of Logic to understand the world. Why do you suppose that is ?
@@williamspringer9447 because you can’t explain logic in a 3 minute clip, he has several lecturers on logic watch those if you’re skeptical about his knowledge.
Mustafa••• I've watched quite a few of his videos . His purpose, like so many other so-called academics , is to keep people like you nice and ignorant of how to properly use the science of Logic to understand State sponsored deception. "Logic, therefore, as the science of thought, or the science of the process of pure reason, should be capable of being constructed a priori." -Arthur Schopenhauer, The Art of Controversy ("A priori" is defined as deduced from self-evident premises.) 'Logic: The science that investigates the principles governing correct or reliable inference.' -Webster's Unabridged Encyclopedic Dictionary 'infer ... v. ,1. To derive by reasoning; conclude or judge from premises or evidence ...' -Webster's Unabridged Encyclopedic Dictionary 'For logic is the science of those principles, laws, and methods which the mind of man in its thinking must follow for the accurate and secure attainment of truth." -Celestine N. Bittle, "The Science of Correct Thinking: Logic" "We suppose ourselves to posses unqualified scientific knowledge of a thing, as opposed to knowing it in the accidental way in which the sophist knows, when we think that we know the cause on which the fact depends, as the cause of that fact and of no other, and further, that the fact could not be other than it is". -Aristotle, Posterior Analytics "We ought in fairness to fight our case with no help beyond the bare facts: nothing, therefore, should matter except the proof of those facts." -Aristotle, Rhetoric "Without the presentation of solid evidence no argument can be a good one" -Patrick Hurley, A Concise Introduction to Logic, 1985 , 2nd edition 'Fallacious reasoning is just the opposite of what can be called cogent reasoning. We reason cogently when we reason (1) validly; (2) from premises well supported by evidence; and (3) using all relevant evidence we know of. The purpose of avoiding fallacious reasoning is, of course, to increase our chances of reasoning cogently.' -Howard Kahane, Logic and Contemporary Rhetoric, 1976, 2nd edition 'The province of Logic must be restricted to that portion of our knowledge which consists of inferences from truths previously known; whether those antecedent data be general propositions, or particular observations and perceptions. Logic is not the science of Belief, but the science of Proof, or Evidence. In so far as belief professes to be founded on proof, the office of Logic is to supply a test for ascertaining whether or not the belief is well grounded.' -John Stuart Mill, A System of Logic "And if we have a right to know any Truth whatsoever, we have a right to think freely, or (according to my Definition) to use our Understandings, in endeavouring to find out the Meaning of any Proposition whatsoever, in considering the nature of the Evidence for or against it, and In judging of it according to the seeming Force or weakness of the evidence: because there is no other way to discover the Truth." -Anthony Collins, 'A Discourse of Free Thinking', 1713, taken from the first page of 'Thinking to Some Purpose ' by L. Susan Stebbing, (1939) 'The fallacy of suppressed evidence is committed when an arguer ignores evidence that would tend to undermine the premises of an otherwise good argument, causing it to be unsound or uncogent. Suppressed evidence is a fallacy of presumption and is closely related to begging the question. As such, it's occurrence does not affect the relationship between premises and conclusion but rather the alleged truth of premises. The fallacy consists in passing off what are at best half-truths as if they were whole truths, thus making what is actually a defective argument appear to be good. The fallacy is especially common among arguers who have a vested interest in the situation to which the argument pertains.' -Patrick Hurley, A Concise Introduction to Logic, (1985), 2nd edition "An argument is a special kind of expression of inference , one that attempts to prove something on the basis of evidence." -Patrick Hurley, A Concise Introduction to Logic, (1985), 2nd edition "The statements that make up an argument are divided into one or more premises and one and only one conclusion. The premises are the statements that set forth the the evidence, and the conclusion is the statement that is claimed to follow from the evidence." -Patrick Hurley, A Concise Introduction to Logic, (1985), 2nd edition "A sound argument is a deductive argument that is valid and has true premises. Both conditions must be met for an argument to be sound, and if either is missing the argument is unsound. The qualification that the premises must be true means that all premises must be true. Because a valid argument is one such that if the premises are true it necessarily follows that the conclusion is true, and because a sound argument does in fact have true premises, it follows that every sound argument, by definition, will have a true conclusions as well. A sound argument, therefore, is what is meant by a "good" deductive argument in the fullest sense of the term." -Patrick Hurley, A Concise Introduction to Logic, (1985), 2nd edition "A cogent argument is an inductive argument that is strong and has true premises, and if either condition is missing the argument is uncogent. A cogent argument is the inductive analogue of a sound deductive argument and is what is meant by a " good" inductive argument without qualification. Because the conclusion of a cogent argument is genuinely supported by true premises, it follows that the conclusion of a cogent argument is probably true." -Patrick Hurley, A Concise Introduction to Logic (1985), 2nd edition 'Aristotle devides all conclusions into logical and dialectical, in the manner described, and then into eristical. (3) Eristic is the method by which the form of the conclusion is correct, but the premises, the material from which it is drawn, are not true, but only appear to be true. Finally (4) sophistic is the method in which the form of the conclusion is false, although it seems correct. These three last properly belong to the art of Controversial Dialectic, as they have no objective truth in view, but only the appearance of it, and pay no regard to truth itself; that is to say, they aim at victory.' -Arthur Schopenhauer, The Art of Controversy 'A high degree of probability is often called 'practical certainty.' A reasonable man should not refrain upon acting upon a practical certainty as though it were known to be true. In England, for instance, it is customary for a judge, at the trial of a person accused of murder, to instruct the jury that an adverse verdict need not be based upon the belief that the guilt of the prisoner has been ' proved ', but upon the belief that the guilt has been established ' beyond a reasonable doubt .' To be ' beyond reasonable doubt ' is to have sufficient evidence to make the proposition in question so much more likely to be true than to be false that we should be prepared to act upon the supposition of its truth. Many of our most important actions have to be performed in accordance with belief of such a kind.' -L. Susan Stebbing, 'Logic in Practice', (1934)
@@williamspringer9447 I too have seen them, what makes you think he’s trying to keep you away from logic when he’s teaching you about logic ? It’s funny you speak of logic but never back your claims
Harry ••••• Here are a few books that are helpful •••• "Logic, therefore, as the science of thought, or the science of the process of pure reason, should be capable of being constructed a priori." -Arthur Schopenhauer, The Art of Controversy ("A priori" is defined as deduced from self-evident premises.) •••••••••• 'Logic: The science that investigates the principles governing correct or reliable inference.' -Webster's Unabridged Encyclopedic Dictionary •••••••••• 'infer ... v. ,1. To derive by reasoning; conclude or judge from premises or evidence ...' -Webster's Unabridged Encyclopedic Dictionary •••••••••• 'For logic is the science of those principles, laws, and methods which the mind of man in its thinking must follow for the accurate and secure attainment of truth." -Celestine N. Bittle, "The Science of Correct Thinking: Logic" •••••••••• "We suppose ourselves to posses unqualified scientific knowledge of a thing, as opposed to knowing it in the accidental way in which the sophist knows, when we think that we know the cause on which the fact depends, as the cause of that fact and of no other, and further, that the fact could not be other than it is". -Aristotle, Posterior Analytics •••••••••• "We ought in fairness to fight our case with no help beyond the bare facts: nothing, therefore, should matter except the proof of those facts." -Aristotle, Rhetoric •••••••••• "Without the presentation of solid evidence no argument can be a good one" -Patrick Hurley, A Concise Introduction to Logic, 1985 •••••••••• 'Fallacious reasoning is just the opposite of what can be called cogent reasoning. We reason cogently when we reason (1) validly; (2) from premises well supported by evidence; and (3) using all relevant evidence we know of. The purpose of avoiding fallacious reasoning is, of course, to increase our chances of reasoning cogently.' -Howard Kahane, Logic and Contemporary Rhetoric, 1976, second edition •••••••••• 'The province of Logic must be restricted to that portion of our knowledge which consists of inferences from truths previously known; whether those antecedent data be general propositions, or particular observations and perceptions. Logic is not the science of Belief, but the science of Proof, or Evidence. In so far as belief professes to be founded on proof, the office of Logic is to supply a test for ascertaining whether or not the belief is well grounded.' -John Stuart Mill, A System of Logic ••••••••• "And if we have a right to know any Truth whatsoever, we have a right to think freely, or (according to my Definition) to use our Understandings, in endeavouring to find out the Meaning of any Proposition whatsoever, in considering the nature of the Evidence for or against it, and In judging of it according to the seeming Force or weakness of the evidence: because there is no other way to discover the Truth." -Anthony Collins, 'A Discourse of Free Thinking', 1713, taken from the first page of 'Thinking to Some Purpose ' by L. Susan Stebbing •••••••••• 'Aristotle devides all conclusions into logical and dialectical, in the manner described, and then into eristical. (3) Eristic is the method by which the form of the conclusion is correct, but the premises, the material from which it is drawn, are not true, but only appear to be true. Finally (4) sophistic is the method in which the form of the conclusion is false, although it seems correct. These three last properly belong to the art of Controversial Dialectic, as they have no objective truth in view, but only the appearance of it, and pay no regard to truth itself; that is to say, they aim at victory.' -Arthur Schopenhauer, The Art of Controversy •••••••••• 'The fallacy of suppressed evidence is committed when an arguer ignores evidence that would tend to undermine the premises of an otherwise good argument, causing it to be unsound or uncogent. Suppressed evidence is a fallacy of presumption and is closely related to begging the question. As such, it's occurrence does not affect the relationship between premises and conclusion but rather the alleged truth of premises. The fallacy consists in passing off what are at best half-truths as if they were whole truths, thus making what is actually a defective argument appear to be good. The fallacy is especially common among arguers who have a vested interest in the situation to which the argument pertains.' -Patrick Hurley, A Concise Introduction to Logic, 1985 •••••••••• 'A high degree of probability is often called 'practical certainty.' A reasonable man should not refrain upon acting upon a practical certainty as though it were known to be true. In England, for instance, it is customary for a judge, at the trial of a person accused of murder, to instruct the jury that an adverse verdict need not be based upon the belief that the guilt of the prisoner has been ' proved ', but upon the belief that the guilt has been established ' beyond a reasonable doubt .' To be ' beyond reasonable doubt ' is to have sufficient evidence to make the proposition in question so much more likely to be true than to be false that we should be prepared to act upon the supposition of its truth. Many of our most important actions have to be performed in accordance with belief of such a kind.' -L. Susan Stebbing, 'Logic in Practice', (1934) pages 98 and 99 ••••••••••
Cherry Blosom •••• Slaves are not meant to understand the science of Logic. That's why it hasn't been taught in our State controlled public schools for more than a century. The Underground History of American Education by John Gatto. And that's why this guy taught you nothing useful about it either.
Shinaz Bakar ••• This guy is not teaching his students to reason logically .He constantly omits or misdefines essential principle of it the science of Logic .
This is good, people should study logic, one of the means this system uses to dominate us is the dissolution of logic. > _Comments on the Society of the Spectacle,_ Guy Debord, 1988.
JoseyWales93 ••••• The science of logic hasn't been taught in our State controlled public schools for more than a century. The Underground History of American Education by John Gatto. •••• Slaves are not meant to understand how to use the science of Logic to evaluate arguments . That makes them too hard to lie to .
lham Syah•••• Slaves are not meant to understand the science of Logic. That's why you weren't taught it in school . And that's why this guy didn't teach you anything about it here .
Assalamu alaykum wa rahmatullahi wa barakatuhu, kind request from a homeschooling mom - we are in need of islamic trivium curriculum so that to stimulate our children's faculties of thinking. May Allah ta'ala assist us all 🤲
America We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all, men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator, with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. They basically took the new land from the most powerfull European king who wanted to take it by telling him to his face, we all became humans when we spoke our own first words. In the beginning was the word, the word was with God and the word is God The founding fathers made this land the land of the free, free of kings, the land of God inspired by judeo christianty, christianty based on Judaism The constitution is all about God No man shall rule like a Pharoah over man, the pope and the arab kings do this.
Lol, the student already said by the people. Then he says rule by the people. He didn't praise the student for getting it right. Me, myself and I style teaching is not teaching, all you get is a bunch of students who follow and idolise the teacher.
Yeah, don't meet your heroes. I like Hamza Yusuf but I guarantee he would see me as less than human and demean me for no reason. I hate him, he's evil and probably wants to kill me.
DAESH does not represent us, same for Tariq Ramadan ?????? I wish cheikh Hamza Yusuf and other scholars will speak as soon as possible for our youths, the silence is deafening
SelDan Alinas ••••• Slaves are not meant to understand the science of Logic. That's why the science of Logic hasn't been taught in our State controlled public schools for more than a century. The Underground History of American Education by John Gatto. You notice that this video taught virtually nothing about how to use the science of Logic to understand the world. Why do you suppose that is?
If Zaytuna keeps uploading these type of clips , in few years it’ll have millions of students all over the world, we were not taught how to even think at school, we live a biased manipulative lives.
Well that's basically more of an etymological approach, which is in fact a logical way of figuring out how the world is. Language serves a number of functions, and by knowing what words mean, it helps you better understand the world in my opinion. Also increases your intellect in general, as well as your vocabulairy, obviously. But knowing what words mean, what their origins are, why certain words were used for certain concepts or objects, events or activities.. all of it increases you in knowledge, which really is distinguishing truth from error. I like one definition of knowledge, as given by a muslim scholar when interviewed by Hamza Yusuf actually. The man said that knowledge is putting all things in their proper places. That's really what it comes down to. He gave the example of what Hamza talks about in this clip, which is the classification of living organisms. Putting things where they belong, where they are; knowing their places. Coining valid similitudes is actually part of logic. So if democracy is a Species, then the Genus could be government, with a society being the Family and the individual being the Order. I wish I could be there, in Hamza Yusuf's classes. I never really had a teacher that impressed me, or made a significant impact on me. I envy the students in these classes. I used to listen a lot to Hamza Yusuf, he taught me a lot about a lot of things really. May Allah increase us all in knowledge, wisdom and good deeds, and may Allah bless Hamza Yusuf and his family; Allahuma ameen.
Well said. You sound like a student of Hamza yusuf. May I ask, did you study logic or philosophy before?
XaeeD ••••
Hamza Yusuf seems to be a master of disinformation .What he puts out in these videos to his students is next to useless . Why doesn't he tell them that the science of Logic hasn't been taught in our State controlled public schools for more than a century? The Underground History of American Education by John Gatto•••••
Answer: Because people who know how to logically evaluate an argument are very hard to lie to .
@@williamspringer9447 yes Mr. Dajjal that's definitely a very sound logical argument you've made there. I think you need more training at Dajjal University, Fox News
@@williamspringer9447 I don't know why he doesn't tell that. He probably should add that here or there but I believe he too has been played into the idea of the left. America is inherently problematic. Which isn't true. But certainly his has little purpose ever telling both, about the underground history or the problems of America. However, that isn't an etymological approach but more of a word play idea which I believe Wittengenstien really thought about.
Besides perhaps to you don't see that he is after all a theologian and not a political scientist. His main purpose I would thus presume is spreading what he calls "Normative Islam".
But I can't at all say that he is a master of disinformation.
@@ihsankamil6279 Well it is logical if that is the only system. If the only topic was America. If he was a political scientist. However, him playing into the lefts' identities politics of white old men suggests that he didn't like what America was but I would beg to differ that he didn't claim either a negative perspective or a positive one. Afterall, he is American and the natural disposition of man being conservative certainly he ought to be a conservative one. What he in the end conserves however, is Sunni Islam.
May Allah grant this man Jannatul firdaws ameen! ❤
May grant All of us Jabbatul Firdaws
I love this highlight, and adore the quality of education this lively interaction represents. Brilliant!
Cynthia Sue Larson ••••
It would have been better if he actually have us some information about how to use the science of Logic to understand the world . But slaves are not meant to understand the science of Logic .
@@williamspringer9447 he's got 11 hours of lecture on YT.good looknfor it...explains what you're looking for. All the best
I love this clip. The students are very engaging.
vizier87 •••••
I wonder if he ever taught them anything useful about the science of Llogic?
@@williamspringer9447 I see your comment everywhere. Relax dude, we get your point
hamza Yousuf always amazed me,I have never looked at it from this prospective
Abdul Wahab paracha •••••
This guy taught you nothing about how to reason logically . Slaves are not meant to understand the science of Logic. That is why the science of Logic hasn't been taught in our State controlled public schools for more than a century . The Underground History of American Education by John Gatto
We need the whole lecture. shaykh hamza yusuf you're a true teacher and scholar
Hamza Yusuf is my greatest teacher of insight.
I am tremendously in debt to him, I resect him and love him a lot.
may Allah grants his moqam higher and higher.
fahim faysal •••
And yet in this video he taught us virtually nothing about how to use the science of Logic to understand the world. Why do you suppose that is ?
@@williamspringer9447 because you can’t explain logic in a 3 minute clip, he has several lecturers on logic watch those if you’re skeptical about his knowledge.
Mustafa•••
I've watched quite a few of his videos . His purpose, like so many other so-called academics , is to keep people like you nice and ignorant of how to properly use the science of Logic to understand State sponsored deception.
"Logic, therefore, as the science of thought, or the science of the process of pure reason, should be capable of being constructed a priori."
-Arthur Schopenhauer, The Art of Controversy
("A priori" is defined as deduced from self-evident premises.)
'Logic: The science that investigates the principles governing correct or reliable inference.'
-Webster's Unabridged Encyclopedic Dictionary
'infer ... v. ,1. To derive by reasoning; conclude or judge from premises or evidence ...'
-Webster's Unabridged Encyclopedic Dictionary
'For logic is the science of those principles, laws, and methods which the mind of man in its thinking must follow for the accurate and secure attainment of truth." -Celestine N. Bittle, "The Science of Correct Thinking: Logic"
"We suppose ourselves to posses unqualified scientific knowledge of a thing, as opposed to knowing it in the accidental way in which the sophist knows, when we think that we know the cause on which the fact depends, as the cause of that fact and of no other, and further, that the fact could not be other than it is".
-Aristotle, Posterior Analytics
"We ought in fairness to fight our case with no help beyond the bare facts: nothing, therefore, should matter except the proof of those facts."
-Aristotle, Rhetoric
"Without the presentation of solid evidence no argument can be a good one"
-Patrick Hurley, A Concise Introduction to Logic, 1985 , 2nd edition
'Fallacious reasoning is just the opposite of what can be called cogent reasoning. We reason cogently when we reason (1) validly; (2) from premises well supported by evidence; and (3) using all relevant evidence we know of. The purpose of avoiding fallacious reasoning is, of course, to increase our chances of reasoning cogently.'
-Howard Kahane, Logic and Contemporary Rhetoric, 1976, 2nd edition
'The province of Logic must be restricted to that portion of our knowledge which consists of inferences from truths previously known; whether those antecedent data be general propositions, or particular observations and perceptions. Logic is not the science of Belief, but the science of Proof, or Evidence. In so far as belief professes to be founded on proof, the office of Logic is to supply a test for ascertaining whether or not the belief is well grounded.'
-John Stuart Mill, A System of Logic
"And if we have a right to know any Truth whatsoever, we have a right to think freely, or (according to my Definition) to use our Understandings, in endeavouring to find out the Meaning of any Proposition whatsoever, in considering the nature of the Evidence for or against it, and In judging of it according to the seeming Force or weakness of the evidence: because there is no other way to discover the Truth."
-Anthony Collins, 'A Discourse of Free Thinking', 1713, taken from the first page of 'Thinking to Some Purpose ' by L. Susan Stebbing, (1939)
'The fallacy of suppressed evidence is committed when an arguer ignores evidence that would tend to undermine the premises of an otherwise good argument, causing it to be unsound or uncogent. Suppressed evidence is a fallacy of presumption and is closely related to begging the question. As such, it's occurrence does not affect the relationship between premises and conclusion but rather the alleged truth of premises. The fallacy consists in passing off what are at best half-truths as if they were whole truths, thus making what is actually a defective argument appear to be good. The fallacy is especially common among arguers who have a vested interest in the situation to which the argument pertains.'
-Patrick Hurley, A Concise Introduction to Logic, (1985), 2nd edition
"An argument is a special kind of expression of inference , one that attempts to prove something on the basis of evidence."
-Patrick Hurley, A Concise Introduction to Logic, (1985), 2nd edition
"The statements that make up an argument are divided into one or more premises and one and only one conclusion. The premises are the statements that set forth the the evidence, and the conclusion is the statement that is claimed to follow from the evidence."
-Patrick Hurley, A Concise Introduction to Logic, (1985), 2nd edition
"A sound argument is a deductive argument that is valid and has true premises. Both conditions must be met for an argument to be sound, and if either is missing the argument is unsound. The qualification that the premises must be true means that all premises must be true. Because a valid argument is one such that if the premises are true it necessarily follows that the conclusion is true, and because a sound argument does in fact have true premises, it follows that every sound argument, by definition, will have a true conclusions as well. A sound argument, therefore, is what is meant by a "good" deductive argument in the fullest sense of the term."
-Patrick Hurley, A Concise Introduction to Logic, (1985), 2nd edition
"A cogent argument is an inductive argument that is strong and has true premises, and if either condition is missing the argument is uncogent. A cogent argument is the inductive analogue of a sound deductive argument and is what is meant by a " good" inductive argument without qualification. Because the conclusion of a cogent argument is genuinely supported by true premises, it follows that the conclusion of a cogent argument is probably true."
-Patrick Hurley, A Concise Introduction to Logic (1985), 2nd edition
'Aristotle devides all conclusions into logical and dialectical, in the manner described, and then into eristical. (3) Eristic is the method by which the form of the conclusion is correct, but the premises, the material from which it is drawn, are not true, but only appear to be true. Finally (4) sophistic is the method in which the form of the conclusion is false, although it seems correct. These three last properly belong to the art of Controversial Dialectic, as they have no objective truth in view, but only the appearance of it, and pay no regard to truth itself; that is to say, they aim at victory.'
-Arthur Schopenhauer, The Art of Controversy
'A high degree of probability is often called 'practical certainty.' A reasonable man should not refrain upon acting upon a practical certainty as though it were known to be true. In England, for instance, it is customary for a judge, at the trial of a person accused of murder, to instruct the jury that an adverse verdict need not be based upon the belief that the guilt of the prisoner has been ' proved ', but upon the belief that the guilt has been established ' beyond a reasonable doubt .' To be ' beyond reasonable doubt ' is to have sufficient evidence to make the proposition in question so much more likely to be true than to be false that we should be prepared to act upon the supposition of its truth. Many of our most important actions have to be performed in accordance with belief of such a kind.' -L. Susan Stebbing, 'Logic in Practice', (1934)
@@williamspringer9447 I too have seen them, what makes you think he’s trying to keep you away from logic when he’s teaching you about logic ? It’s funny you speak of logic but never back your claims
Handsome smart man is the speaker.
Blessed be where ever you are and so muslimeen
I really appreciate and endorse your Logic...!
May Allah bless you all the time
Can't have enough of this man.
Sir I'm from India
Thank you sir to give knowledge
Alhamdulilah, spot on.
Genius always speaks truth.
Full lecture of this clip
May Allah bless u
please could you put the complete lessons
Harry go study at zaytuna college.
Harry •••••
Here are a few books that are helpful ••••
"Logic, therefore, as the science of thought, or the science of the process of pure reason, should be capable of being constructed a priori."
-Arthur Schopenhauer, The Art of Controversy
("A priori" is defined as deduced from self-evident premises.) ••••••••••
'Logic: The science that investigates the principles governing correct or reliable inference.'
-Webster's Unabridged Encyclopedic Dictionary ••••••••••
'infer ... v. ,1. To derive by reasoning; conclude or judge from premises or evidence ...'
-Webster's Unabridged Encyclopedic Dictionary ••••••••••
'For logic is the science of those principles, laws, and methods which the mind of man in its thinking must follow for the accurate and secure attainment of truth." -Celestine N. Bittle, "The Science of Correct Thinking: Logic" ••••••••••
"We suppose ourselves to posses unqualified scientific knowledge of a thing, as opposed to knowing it in the accidental way in which the sophist knows, when we think that we know the cause on which the fact depends, as the cause of that fact and of no other, and further, that the fact could not be other than it is".
-Aristotle, Posterior Analytics ••••••••••
"We ought in fairness to fight our case with no help beyond the bare facts: nothing, therefore, should matter except the proof of those facts."
-Aristotle, Rhetoric ••••••••••
"Without the presentation of solid evidence no argument can be a good one"
-Patrick Hurley, A Concise Introduction to Logic, 1985 ••••••••••
'Fallacious reasoning is just the opposite of what can be called cogent reasoning. We reason cogently when we reason (1) validly; (2) from premises well supported by evidence; and (3) using all relevant evidence we know of. The purpose of avoiding fallacious reasoning is, of course, to increase our chances of reasoning cogently.'
-Howard Kahane, Logic and Contemporary Rhetoric, 1976, second edition ••••••••••
'The province of Logic must be restricted to that portion of our knowledge which consists of inferences from truths previously known; whether those antecedent data be general propositions, or particular observations and perceptions. Logic is not the science of Belief, but the science of Proof, or Evidence. In so far as belief professes to be founded on proof, the office of Logic is to supply a test for ascertaining whether or not the belief is well grounded.'
-John Stuart Mill, A System of Logic •••••••••
"And if we have a right to know any Truth whatsoever, we have a right to think freely, or (according to my Definition) to use our Understandings, in endeavouring to find out the Meaning of any Proposition whatsoever, in considering the nature of the Evidence for or against it, and In judging of it according to the seeming Force or weakness of the evidence: because there is no other way to discover the Truth."
-Anthony Collins, 'A Discourse of Free Thinking', 1713, taken from the first page of 'Thinking to Some Purpose ' by L. Susan Stebbing ••••••••••
'Aristotle devides all conclusions into logical and dialectical, in the manner described, and then into eristical. (3) Eristic is the method by which the form of the conclusion is correct, but the premises, the material from which it is drawn, are not true, but only appear to be true. Finally (4) sophistic is the method in which the form of the conclusion is false, although it seems correct. These three last properly belong to the art of Controversial Dialectic, as they have no objective truth in view, but only the appearance of it, and pay no regard to truth itself; that is to say, they aim at victory.'
-Arthur Schopenhauer, The Art of Controversy ••••••••••
'The fallacy of suppressed evidence is committed when an arguer ignores evidence that would tend to undermine the premises of an otherwise good argument, causing it to be unsound or uncogent. Suppressed evidence is a fallacy of presumption and is closely related to begging the question. As such, it's occurrence does not affect the relationship between premises and conclusion but rather the alleged truth of premises. The fallacy consists in passing off what are at best half-truths as if they were whole truths, thus making what is actually a defective argument appear to be good. The fallacy is especially common among arguers who have a vested interest in the situation to which the argument pertains.'
-Patrick Hurley, A Concise Introduction to Logic, 1985 ••••••••••
'A high degree of probability is often called 'practical certainty.' A reasonable man should not refrain upon acting upon a practical certainty as though it were known to be true. In England, for instance, it is customary for a judge, at the trial of a person accused of murder, to instruct the jury that an adverse verdict need not be based upon the belief that the guilt of the prisoner has been ' proved ', but upon the belief that the guilt has been established ' beyond a reasonable doubt .' To be ' beyond reasonable doubt ' is to have sufficient evidence to make the proposition in question so much more likely to be true than to be false that we should be prepared to act upon the supposition of its truth. Many of our most important actions have to be performed in accordance with belief of such a kind.' -L. Susan Stebbing, 'Logic in Practice', (1934) pages 98 and 99 ••••••••••
@@williamspringer9447 Wow, thank you so much for your recommendations and your time. May God reward you for it >3
Harry ••••
You are most welcome.
As-Salaamu alaikum. Interesting, why haven't Yusuf Hamza said something about the coronavirus?
Zafirah Coleman ••••
Yes too busy giving useless disinformation out about the science of Logic and the art of rhetoric .
The best Question..The Best answer...
Bulls Eye.... Yay !Masha Allah. Logic
Cherry Blosom ••••
Slaves are not meant to understand the science of Logic. That's why it hasn't been taught in our State controlled public schools for more than a century. The Underground History of American Education by John Gatto.
And that's why this guy taught you nothing useful about it either.
Very logical
....its because the TEACHER engages...
so?how democracy help in this problem?where's the full video?is he give answer properly?
I like him
from bangladesh
tanki lo •••
When is he actually going to teach something useful about the science of Logic ?
What am inspiration ☪️
Sir I am from Pakistan.welcom in my heart
where can we find the whole lecture series on Logic?
Not in your quran for sure - it is logical piece of junk.
@@George-iv1hi Please stop being ignorant
Ali Hameed•••••
The science of logic has been around for thousands of years . But this guy isn't teaching it .
@@George-iv1hi Do you have any idea how ignorant your comment makes you look...
@@adnan86pk Do you have any idea how stupid you are? Finish any decent school, brainwashed moron.
May Allah bless you
Where can one access the whole logic course ?
Imran Maljee one can go to zaytuna college.
Imran Maljee••••
When is he actually going to teach us how to use the science of Logic to understand the world?
@@VirtueImperial ua-cam.com/video/bNJ58L8IAW0/v-deo.html
Ya Allah please make him my teacher. Ameen.
Shinaz Bakar •••
This guy is not teaching his students to reason logically .He constantly omits or misdefines essential principle of it the science of Logic .
@Zaytuna College can I upload this video in my channel..I want dubbing it in Bengali so that bengali people can understand sheikhs wisdom
Md Ramij••••
This guy is a master of disinformation . Yes not teaching real logic and rhetoric in these videos
This is good, people should study logic, one of the means this system uses to dominate us is the dissolution of logic.
>
_Comments on the Society of the Spectacle,_ Guy Debord, 1988.
JoseyWales93 •••••
The science of logic hasn't been taught in our State controlled public schools for more than a century. The Underground History of American Education by John Gatto. ••••
Slaves are not meant to understand how to use the science of Logic to evaluate arguments . That makes them too hard to lie to .
i know that i didnt pay the tuition fee or anything, but it would be better if there is a full video. hehehe.. thank you
lham Syah••••
Slaves are not meant to understand the science of Logic. That's why you weren't taught it in school . And that's why this guy didn't teach you anything about it here .
I'm indan. Does zaytuna university admit students from overseas.
Can anyone help me to know to these concerns ♥️
Salam alaykum. Yes, we do! Please visit us at zaytuna.edu/admissions for details.
I am sohel
From Bangladesh
Assalamu alaykum wa rahmatullahi wa barakatuhu, kind request from a homeschooling mom - we are in need of islamic trivium curriculum so that to stimulate our children's faculties of thinking. May Allah ta'ala assist us all 🤲
From india
جميل
3:05
Imagine being under king undermining representative
America
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all, men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator, with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
They basically took the new land from the most powerfull European king who wanted to take it by telling him to his face, we all became humans when we spoke our own first words.
In the beginning was the word, the word was with God and the word is God
The founding fathers made this land the land of the free, free of kings, the land of God inspired by judeo christianty, christianty based on Judaism
The constitution is all about God
No man shall rule like a Pharoah over man, the pope and the arab kings do this.
🇰🇿🤲🏽👍
Lol, the student already said by the people. Then he says rule by the people. He didn't praise the student for getting it right. Me, myself and I style teaching is not teaching, all you get is a bunch of students who follow and idolise the teacher.
Yeah, don't meet your heroes. I like Hamza Yusuf but I guarantee he would see me as less than human and demean me for no reason. I hate him, he's evil and probably wants to kill me.
DAESH does not represent us, same for Tariq Ramadan ?????? I wish cheikh Hamza Yusuf and other scholars will speak as soon as possible for our youths, the silence is deafening
SelDan Alinas •••••
Slaves are not meant to understand the science of Logic. That's why the science of Logic hasn't been taught in our State controlled public schools for more than a century. The Underground History of American Education by John Gatto.
You notice that this video taught virtually nothing about how to use the science of Logic to understand the world. Why do you suppose that is?
Let us apply the same thinking and process to Tariq Ramadan sayings, doings and note the result...
3:06