kevin alexander no he should not get the challenge back because the overall system didn’t fail to work. It was the graphical portion that didn’t work. The chair revived confirmation from the review official that the ball was in and thus still loses the challenge. Had he announced that Hawkeye was completely unavailable and that we would have to go with the original call, then both you and Roger would be correct.
trwent , the review official in the Hawkeye booth and the Hawkeye technician can see whether the ball was in or out even if the Virtual Reality graphic fails to display on the big screen. They simply communicated this to the chair umpire via the radio.
Lol, yeah very class act to passively aggressively ask the umpire if he feels comfortable with his call. He wasn't trying to intimidate the umpire at all...
Wasn't the issue here that hawkeye was working but the graphic just didn't display? In that case he's wrong and loses the challenge. However, looking at the bounce it looked just in.
219 cameras around the court, everybody knows were the ball is going on serve and there is ZERO footage of it. Why use hawk eye when you could have bleeding cameras in super slow motion.
Because you then still have to a.) pick a camera and b.) use human judgment to interpret the footage, which will lead to exactly the same heated arguments that surround ball marks today where h there's no hawk-eye.
@@molybdaenmornell123hopp5 The Cameras are already there and there would be only umpire judgement, but with a factual image not a computer generated one.
player has a right to challenge and then if Hawkeye doesn't work that challenge becomes void and you have to go with the original call cus what else can you do? but the challenge hasn't been fulfilled so for the umpire to take that away is really unfair. idk what it says in the book but if the umpire decided to at least keep federer's remaining challenge no one would have had a problem with that.
''You owe me an apology, You owe me an apology, I don't cheat to win. I'd rather lose....Say your Sorry, Say your Sorry, I mean it, You are a thief'' 😭😭😭😭
Everyone feels annoyed and angry but changing urself and ur old attitudes and coming from it what matters the most. Rog is a human too he do to have feelings.
@@babasemka Hawkeye confirmed that the ball was in, that's what the umpire was told over the radio, there was just a problem putting it on on-court the screen. It's still an incorrect challenge so he still loses it.
@@edwardsaywell4311 Still, this is not the point. The umpire does not know all this information. The right call has not been proved to him in any way, he never knew for certainty that the ball was out, because he didn't see the hawkeye result, so yea. You are right to say the ball is out, because you saw the replay. The umpire wasn't because he didn't. Do you get it now, or should I draw a diagram with detailed instructions? And I don't buy all that "he's been told by the radio" bullshit. If that is the case, the umpire should've told Federer about it.
@@babasemka I agree he should have told Federer hence my original comment that he 'seemed unable to explain'... but if you just "don't buy it" then I can't help you lmao and yes I will have my diagram please
Dirty play, nobody cares about it, but always is the same attitude against rivals who is playing better than him. Por example del potro (us open final 09 in 3rd set last game), raonic (WB 17 QF), etc. Poor class acts
@@tomaspaladino2483What? What a load of nonsense - Federer had a valid point here and in both of the times you cite. He was definitely not trying to employ dirty play.
If novak does this, gets booed. Call him arrogant unsportmanship, but when fed "i like his attitude and style" you can only see that everything is all about favouritism
I like Novak a lot. But you can't deny that he just acts like a dick sometimes. Like he did in the Olympics recently. Novak just can't get a hold of his temper sometimes, and he ends up smashing or throwing his raquets constantly. But before that he goes on saying things like "Pressure is a priviledge..." and then he can't handle the pressure and smacks his raquet. So? How does he expect the audience to react? Clapping and supporting him while overlooking such behaviour? Not gonna happen. Rafa and Roger on the other side have also lost their temper, but you can't say that those things happen as often as they happen to Novak.
Federer is getting booed here too, just for the record. Some people like every little thing he does, yes, but most tennis fans are not that unbalanced.
Because of Djokovic's antecedents- beats his chest, cringeworthy celebrations, smashes rackets, takes off shirt while celebrating, takes toilet breaks to disrupt opponent's rhythm...and a host of other things.
@@ifeanyiikpegbu6465 you are long about toilet breaks though. he is not taking 9 minute breaks like tsitsipas which breaks rhythm. he takes around 3-4 min at max which is pretty normal. he even took toilet break against zverev in USO and guess what, no one noticed.
fun fact: Feder won this set 7/6 against Berdych and he also took the trophy of '18 AO....... :D
Darth Vader mode when he comes to the umpire
Bro I love his attitude and his style
He should get his challenge back if the technology related to the challenge fails to work. The umpire is useless
kevin alexander no he should not get the challenge back because the overall system didn’t fail to work. It was the graphical portion that didn’t work. The chair revived confirmation from the review official that the ball was in and thus still loses the challenge.
Had he announced that Hawkeye was completely unavailable and that we would have to go with the original call, then both you and Roger would be correct.
no, the hawkeye graphics didn't show, but umpire called for the outcome by his transmitter, so the challenge happened.
WHO looked at it then?
No use of hawkeye if they don't show us the ball. Hawkeye has made mistakes many times before. Its useless
trwent , the review official in the Hawkeye booth and the Hawkeye technician can see whether the ball was in or out even if the Virtual Reality graphic fails to display on the big screen. They simply communicated this to the chair umpire via the radio.
Lol, I remember this same guy Federer was playing and the umpire didn't call the double bounce on the ball, making him lose a point.
Not the same umpire though. It was Lahyani.
It was against the same rival tho.
Federer won a point the same way and didn't show any sportmanship then. ua-cam.com/video/E9BXo-kEWWc/v-deo.html
Such a class act fed is even when angry he’s polite and level headed
Yeah, after watching Federer “angry” I went to watch some Johnny McEnroe tantrums. Night and day.
Not always
@@goxyeagle8446 you can't just say "not always" and not provide any evidence to back your argument...
@@ATalkingBadger He smashed racquet when he played against Novak, he yelled at fan: "shut up!" During game.
Lol, yeah very class act to passively aggressively ask the umpire if he feels comfortable with his call. He wasn't trying to intimidate the umpire at all...
Wasn't the issue here that hawkeye was working but the graphic just didn't display? In that case he's wrong and loses the challenge.
However, looking at the bounce it looked just in.
219 cameras around the court, everybody knows were the ball is going on serve and there is ZERO footage of it. Why use hawk eye when you could have bleeding cameras in super slow motion.
you may be right :D
Because you then still have to a.) pick a camera and b.) use human judgment to interpret the footage, which will lead to exactly the same heated arguments that surround ball marks today where h
there's no hawk-eye.
@@molybdaenmornell123hopp5 The Cameras are already there and there would be only umpire judgement, but with a factual image not a computer generated one.
So elegant angry🐐
🤮
@@greyworm1791 🇷🇸 🐖🤢🤮🤮
player has a right to challenge and then if Hawkeye doesn't work that challenge becomes void and you have to go with the original call cus what else can you do? but the challenge hasn't been fulfilled so for the umpire to take that away is really unfair. idk what it says in the book but if the umpire decided to at least keep federer's remaining challenge no one would have had a problem with that.
replay point I guess?
@@tomr6955but they didn't replay the point, it was given to Berdych
this is how you make pressure on the umpire without being serena williams
''You owe me an apology, You owe me an apology, I don't cheat to win. I'd rather lose....Say your Sorry, Say your Sorry, I mean it, You are a thief'' 😭😭😭😭
Haters
Looked well long
Power abuse from the umpire. Challenge system didn't work, you keep your challenge.
The umpires call is wrong - this is OUT. you can pause the video at 3 sec and see it
Federer was content to lose that point but he was right about his challenge. It should not be taken away.
Wrong hawk eye worked but video didn't.
Everyone feels annoyed and angry but changing urself and ur old attitudes and coming from it what matters the most. Rog is a human too he do to have feelings.
Nobody has any clue what the hell you just said..
@@davecarsley8773 then ig u dk how to speak english.😂😂😂
When Novak or other ones do this tartums, the words are changing...
😻😻😻😻
Roger chaires en la lista
Looking for examples where men did what Williams did and went unpunished.
Hmm, "It's your call, you're the umpire"…
@Adam Roshak p.s. does a talentless person come from poverty to 23 grand slams you distasteful jerk.
@@jaydenm2441 do YOU kiss your mother with that mouth?
@@dodman3043 yeah
@@jaydenm2441 shame.
@@dodman3043 don't say that about your life
It was out by a mile
That's not the point, though.
Ferg was right but seems unable to explain why
No, he wasn't
@@babasemka Hawkeye confirmed that the ball was in, that's what the umpire was told over the radio, there was just a problem putting it on on-court the screen. It's still an incorrect challenge so he still loses it.
@@edwardsaywell4311 Still, this is not the point. The umpire does not know all this information. The right call has not been proved to him in any way, he never knew for certainty that the ball was out, because he didn't see the hawkeye result, so yea. You are right to say the ball is out, because you saw the replay. The umpire wasn't because he didn't. Do you get it now, or should I draw a diagram with detailed instructions?
And I don't buy all that "he's been told by the radio" bullshit. If that is the case, the umpire should've told Federer about it.
@@babasemka I agree he should have told Federer hence my original comment that he 'seemed unable to explain'... but if you just "don't buy it" then I can't help you lmao and yes I will have my diagram please
@kal Ke I think you are confused, but that's alright.
This is out
A mistake from the referee, no result from hawkeye so you don't lose your challenge, simple.
Edgar corral cuadra martin corona
‘We can’t show you the film…’ What??? To protect the umpire and whichever tennis organization was behind the tournament. That’s a bit strange.
So he Loses a Challenge even if Hawkeye is NOT Working?...Makes no sense at all
He's arguing just to argue here, make Berdych think about it even further lol.
Dirty play, nobody cares about it, but always is the same attitude against rivals who is playing better than him.
Por example del potro (us open final 09 in 3rd set last game), raonic (WB 17 QF), etc. Poor class acts
Bullshit. Don't talk shit@@tomaspaladino2483
@@tomaspaladino2483What? What a load of nonsense - Federer had a valid point here and in both of the times you cite. He was definitely not trying to employ dirty play.
It’s always a match against berdych xd
I love Rog, but he was wrong. If the Hawkeye ain't working they go with the original call
Just when I thought the rules of tennis could not get any dumber... ROFL
*Player has completely valid point*
Tennis fans: Boooo
He lost a challenge after this?
Yes, thats why he is upset
That guy Federer is he any good at tennis? I think he has nice T-shirt so maybe he has a chance to play some good tennis.
If Djokovic argued with umpire peoples would start Booing... that's why Djokovic give the crowd in full with interest every time
People are booing Fed here.
Because Djokovic is an ass and Federer isn't. There you go.
Maybe Djokovic is an idiot. Maybe Roger Federer isn't an idiot.
Just what the actual fuck are you saying? Federer is literally booed. Fucking djoko toxic fanboys
Typical Djokobitch fan with a chip on their shoulder
Potato with legs
serena williams should watch it !!
Yup, because it is the exact situation Serena been through. Perfect Federer would never been treated unfairly like Serena have been. Shut up boomer
@@danielvitor8407 Ok, pal. Relax.
If novak does this, gets booed. Call him arrogant unsportmanship, but when fed "i like his attitude and style" you can only see that everything is all about favouritism
It’s because Djokovic acts like a dick. The way he carries himself, the way he behaves.
I like Novak a lot. But you can't deny that he just acts like a dick sometimes.
Like he did in the Olympics recently.
Novak just can't get a hold of his temper sometimes, and he ends up smashing or throwing his raquets constantly. But before that he goes on saying things like "Pressure is a priviledge..." and then he can't handle the pressure and smacks his raquet.
So? How does he expect the audience to react? Clapping and supporting him while overlooking such behaviour? Not gonna happen.
Rafa and Roger on the other side have also lost their temper, but you can't say that those things happen as often as they happen to Novak.
Federer is getting booed here too, just for the record. Some people like every little thing he does, yes, but most tennis fans are not that unbalanced.
Because of Djokovic's antecedents- beats his chest, cringeworthy celebrations, smashes rackets, takes off shirt while celebrating, takes toilet breaks to disrupt opponent's rhythm...and a host of other things.
@@ifeanyiikpegbu6465 you are long about toilet breaks though. he is not taking 9 minute breaks like tsitsipas which breaks rhythm. he takes around 3-4 min at max which is pretty normal. he even took toilet break against zverev in USO and guess what, no one noticed.
So many problems with this umpire
Yeah... like making the right calls and following the rules as written! Asshole!!!!!
Roger arguing with a potato that happens to have legs and arms.
A Kyrgios banger, i like it hahah
The umpire is 🤮
This umpire should be banned for life!! !
Is this umpire OK? Any brain damage or something? WTF?
Manbaby
Gets bent out of shape when he’s losing. Retire already.
He was always miserable on court go get real job baby