P-39 Airacobra A Short History

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 20 лип 2024
  • P-39 Airacobra A Short History
    The P-39 Airacobra is a unique fighter aircraft from World War 2. Designed by the Bell Aircraft Company, the P-39 had the engine mounted behind the pilot, tricycle landing gear and a 37mm cannon that fired through the propellor driveshaft. All unique attributes to this aircraft.
    About 9,500 P-39s were built over the course of the war. 4,800 were sent to Russia under Lend Lease, where they proved effective in the low level air warfare of that theater. Due to a lack of a turbocharger, the P-39 could not be used at altitudes above 15,000 feet.
    The P-39 model shown is from the FMS model airplane company. The model is essentially ready to fly with just the controls needing to be connected. For a full review of this kit:
    • FMS P-39 RTF RC Plane ...
    If you would like to purchase the FMS P-39 and save some money, click link below and use a discount code when checking out:
    www.fmshobby.com/products/fms...
    10% off code: TimMcKay
    $15 off code: $15TimMcKay
    Chapters
    00:00 - Intro
    00:38 - Overview
    01:05 - P-39 design work
    01:35 - P-39 internal cannon
    02:40 - Turbocharger discussion
    03:45 - Russian use of the P-39

КОМЕНТАРІ • 26

  • @JamesRCPlaneTech
    @JamesRCPlaneTech 6 місяців тому +2

    Nice, I always like to see the connection between the hobby and real planes.

    • @TimMcKay56
      @TimMcKay56  6 місяців тому

      Thanks for checking in! Tim

  • @hangflyer907
    @hangflyer907 6 місяців тому

    Great presentation on the P-39. My father flew both the P-39, and P-63, during WWII but didn't have much good to say about them. He said both cockpits were cramped and small, even for a 5'10" pilot, and he was fortunate to never have to bail out of one because of the door.

    • @TimMcKay56
      @TimMcKay56  6 місяців тому

      Thanks! Agree, bailing out would be a nightmare. 😳🙈 Tim

  • @txkflier
    @txkflier 6 місяців тому

    Good overview. Having the engine near the CG brought the center of mass closer to the CG which helped with maneuverability. But, the P-39 had a tendency to become tail-heavy when the 37mm ammo was used up and they would snaproll unexpectedly. The P-39 Airacobra and the P-40 Warhawk were the best fighters we had before WWII started. I've been wanting a P-39 ever since the P-63 collided with the B-17 at Dallas. I wish I could find an NIB E-flite P-39. It was a little larger than the FMS version.

    • @TimMcKay56
      @TimMcKay56  6 місяців тому +1

      Great points, good luck with your search! Tim

  • @collinmccallum
    @collinmccallum 6 місяців тому +1

    beautiful design!

  • @RebelByNature
    @RebelByNature 6 місяців тому

    Great video. I was aware of the p39, but did not know much about it. Hope you do more historical aircraft videos particularly in the WWII scale area.

    • @TimMcKay56
      @TimMcKay56  6 місяців тому

      I will certainly add to my list! Tim

    • @RebelByNature
      @RebelByNature 6 місяців тому

      @@TimMcKay56 You know what else is super cool imho, is the FPV RC plane stuff using goggles, presumably a spotter, with head tracking so you can look around (camera in the cockpit moves in two axis based on your head movement). Curious what it takes to do that, equipment, cost etc. Just an idea.

  • @KalibasauRC_64
    @KalibasauRC_64 6 місяців тому

    Nice history of rc plane, Brother

  • @halgilley5717
    @halgilley5717 6 місяців тому

    Respectfully disagree with our turbocharger statement. Only some American planes had turbochargers (P-38, P-47, B-17, B-24 and B-29). All the other combatants in WWII had single stage engines and were able to get adequate high altitude performance. The British and Americans did have two stage supercharging which used a second stage mechanical supercharger instead of a second stage turbocharger for superior high altitude performance. The main problem with the P-39 was excessive weight which was easily corrected. Remove the .30 caliber wing guns and some of the excessive armor plate and P-39 performance was on par with the Me109 and Fw190 at all altitudes.

    • @TimMcKay56
      @TimMcKay56  6 місяців тому

      Thanks for this update! Tim

  • @AnonymousFlight9600
    @AnonymousFlight9600 6 місяців тому

    Hi there, Tim. I need help with my bnf umx, for some reason earlier it would bind, but then the control surfaces would freeze and a red led would begin blinking, i restarted it several times, then it stopped binding completely.

    • @TimMcKay56
      @TimMcKay56  6 місяців тому +1

      I think if the light is blinking, receiver is looking for a transmitter signal to bind with. Ensure you do this correctly. On the DX6, you hold the TX bind button as you turn on the transmitter. We sure to point the TX antenna away from the receiver, this seems to help. Tim

  • @alexherrera3918
    @alexherrera3918 6 місяців тому

    Nice review. Do you prefer spektrum SAFE or FMS reflex?

    • @TimMcKay56
      @TimMcKay56  6 місяців тому +1

      Thanks! I do not use SAFE or Reflex, cannot offer an opinion. Tim

    • @txkflier
      @txkflier 6 місяців тому +1

      The FMS Reflex works very much like Spektrum's AS3X/SAFE, but the Reflex software will only let you configure them for FMS planes. It's almost impossible to put a Reflex gyro in a non-FMS plane. On a 3-position switch, the Reflex gyro has Off, "AS3X", and "SAFE". FMS doesn't use those names, but that's how it works.

    • @alexherrera3918
      @alexherrera3918 6 місяців тому

      @@txkflier ok Thanks

    • @TimMcKay56
      @TimMcKay56  6 місяців тому +1

      @@txkflier Great info, thanks! Tim

  • @Tammy-un3ql
    @Tammy-un3ql 6 місяців тому

    Real

  • @MrGaborseres
    @MrGaborseres 6 місяців тому

    ✌️