Alec we enjoyed having you in our room, and it was great chatting with you on your way out. A bit disappointed you didn't mention the outstanding floor staff, but no worries......Hope to see you again!!
I've just recently starting taking poker a little bit more seriously. The explanations of the hands are very good and I am proud that many of your strategies I have noticed or picked up in my time playing. It assures me I am on the right step. Hopefully this new motivation of mine to take poker seriously pays dividends. Thank you for helping us!
For hand #5 before the river, there are the same number of combos of AQ compared to AA/KK. 12 combos of AQ (4 aces, 3 queens remaining), and 6 combos of AA, 6 combos of KK. So there isnt "double the possibility that he has AA or KK". Unless you're not giving villian all AQo combos. But on the river the AQ combos is reduced to 8, so still AA/KK combos isnt double the combos of AQ combos. He could also have the 2 combos of KQs
You are absolutely on point when you say that these games should be (relatively) easy to beat, especially given the context of opponent hand ranges, who is a pro and who is not and the 200BB buy-in structure. Also, happy birthday. 🎂
Poker scene out there is pretty easy to clean up. I was out there last year and had two great sessions w easy reads to cash out for about $3500 First time I ever went to PS…if I ever go back… definitely gonna play there again
Tough to get past the first hand. You bet/jam the flopped straight and expected to get action? Not unless you are against a set, poorly played hand in a typical 2-5 nl.
In the queens spot I’m jamming. I truly wish I could give you some high level analysis but at that stack depth my solver has me jam JJ and QQ there often and it’s just something that I’ve memorized.
Game selection. Simply put the lower the stakes, the more tables of said games are in play. This lowers the overall average of the collective "table skillset" for lack of a better term. When you are used to playing at the high level you are frequenting, dropping down is sort of like shooting fish in a barrel. Just my .02
Great video overall! I don't quite understand his math at @14:39 though, "there are twice as many AA, KKs than AQ". There are 4 unseen Aces and 2 unseen queens that makes 8. There are 12 combos of AA, KK (6 each). So it's 1.5 : 1 not 2 : 1 and on the turn it was exactly a coin flip but still super informative video.
Thanks for the content! Love the vids! I swear though, the NE has THE toughest 2/5 tables in North America. Come play Mohegan/foxwoods/twin and tell me what you think. I think $50/hr at those tables is only possible on certain days.
Nice, I enjoyed it. Me as a grinder small stakes pro would not really be getting into many similar spots I think. I just finished 22 weeks @ 1-3, with an 11.3 K profit in a 100 bb capped buyin, and one thing I take from you here, that with a bigger buyin you can make a much nicer hourly Thanks
8:04 I play 2 NL and 5 NL and I'm grimacing. AQ wins 25.56% with only 2 cards to come. Even if this was pre-flop and the other guy had AK, it's about the same, with AQ winning about 25%.
15:04 but what would you do if he raise-shoves? For me it's probably often a call and a loss when the opponent has a Queen for the stronger Full House.
The word "smaller" suggests that there is a comparison being made with something else that is larger. In this context, without additional information, it is unclear what is being compared to as the surrounding text does not provide the full picture.
I would probably call as I don't think many combinations of straights like A2 and 67 are plasuable. Maybe, 3 of a kind could play this way but at the same time I think 3 of a kind would just call
Nice video Alec… but.. just say he jammed when the Queen came on the river, you bet the 200.00 putting him on kings or aces.. let’s say instead of him callin the 200.00 him jammed. Realistically a lot of players would jam here. What would your play if the villain jammed and went all in?
10:51 What would I do and why? I would shove. While holding the Queens. And why? OK, the options are to raise, fold, or call. 1. Fold option: I wouldn't fold because my hand is too strong, way too strong. I could probably fold AK, AQ, other non-pairs. But I cannot fold a hand like QQ with a runner-runner Flush draw. Simply too strong compared to other hands I might have. I also don't have a tight image. 2. Call option: I wouldn't call because why? The only way a call would help much is if the opponent is entirely bluff-raising, and you haven't called him a maniac. Even if it is a total bluff, there's still a remote chance that the total bluff would outdraw me. 3. Raise: There isn't much left behind, so the raise could be a shove, so I would shove.
Hi Alex, question in relation to your 80/20 video. Say I have a roll of $2k. $1600 goes to cash. $400 to tourneys. But what happens if I play a few sessions of tourneys and I lose $300. My roll is now $1700. But that means that my tourney roll is now $340 or 20%. If I decide to have another few sessions of tourneys and continue losing, it will keep putting a dint in bankroll. How do you manage this?
Alec, why not an exploitative min raise on the flop with the flopped nuts on the first hand? Followed by two small-ish bets on Turn and River? I always ask myself "how can I get all in against the widest possible range?"
For hand #4, I would call. Villain should be polarized here, but since this is a fishy $2/$5 game, he has many worse over pairs in range. I think KK specifically would be inclined to 4-bet you preflop because he doesn't want to give 2 ranges the chance to flop an ace or a set, even if he is the tricky kind. He may have that anxiety to a lesser extent with AA. So his value range is flopped sets and sandbagged AA; he also has 66 and 22 as merges that don't particularly care about stacking off into an over-pair, and he has bluffs, specifically the NFD which is also a gutter. Villain shouldn't even be flatting 33 and 44 here but we know that he is. If he doesn't have the discipline to lay those down preflop, then he probably also thinks that 77 or 88 here is the nuts and/or you're full of shit. So combo-wise, there's at least twice as many worse over pairs in his range compared to nutted combinations, so folding is, I think, out of the question. Since we're going to pile it, the question is how; the NFD will most likely call off if we jam, reasoning that he has 50% equity (which he does.) Same with the straights. But he might fold the portion of his range that is dead, such as 88, and we don't want that. He may also have some bullshit hand like KJo, and if this is the case, we want to keep him in. So I would call, then pile if he checks any non-heart turn, and call if he shoves. However if the turn is specifically an ace or a heart, we do have to fold to the jam, I think, which is going to happen 22% of the time. If we get some sick live read, or get some good price, maybe we can continue. But this is worth it given that, say, 50% of the time, we aren't letting him off the hook with 66-JJ, which is going to pay us.
Pretty sure he has 12 combos of AA, KK and 12 combos AQ, It's equally likely, not double. Even at the river is 12 vs 8. If he ever has KQss here, then its off even more.
64 is not the nuts on an 875 board. You know this. We know you mean the "essential nuts", but sometimes you're up against 96 and it can also get really bad if the turn is a 9 or a 6.
@@zekebones34 I missed the "close to it" part, but I'm not that guy because it's important to know that you don't have the nuts. You can be that guy that can't accept criticism.
Leave it to Torelli to get the poker combos math wrong then try to sell you a course on poker math. On the river there are 6 combos of AA, 6 combos of KK, and 8 combos of AQ.
lol yes, you're right! I should have specified I discounted some because he doesn't always 3-bet AQo given the fact it's me and positions, whereas he always 3-bets KK/AA. I realize this looks careless on my part and thank you for pointing it out. Come to think of it, it may actually be closer to 4 combos based on this assumption I'm making. Anyway, my broader point was KK/AA is way more likely than AQ, no matter how you cut the cards.
Alec we enjoyed having you in our room, and it was great chatting with you on your way out. A bit disappointed you didn't mention the outstanding floor staff, but no worries......Hope to see you again!!
You're totally right, you deserved an honorable mention! Thanks for being such great hosts and keep up the great work!
@@ConsciousPoker Haha Just messing with you Alec but I do appreciate the kind words for myself and our room. Take care...
@@paulp8652 the staff is nice but the management sucks $2 jackpot drop and no jackpot supposedly goes to Promotions come on
This was a fun to watch vlog with great commentary and good advice, as we’ve come to expect from you, Alec. Many thanks! 🍀👍🥳🍀
Thanks for the support!
I've just recently starting taking poker a little bit more seriously. The explanations of the hands are very good and I am proud that many of your strategies I have noticed or picked up in my time playing. It assures me I am on the right step. Hopefully this new motivation of mine to take poker seriously pays dividends. Thank you for helping us!
Awesome I'm glad you're improving. Keep up the good work!
For hand #5 before the river, there are the same number of combos of AQ compared to AA/KK. 12 combos of AQ (4 aces, 3 queens remaining), and 6 combos of AA, 6 combos of KK. So there isnt "double the possibility that he has AA or KK". Unless you're not giving villian all AQo combos. But on the river the AQ combos is reduced to 8, so still AA/KK combos isnt double the combos of AQ combos. He could also have the 2 combos of KQs
Spot on. As he was saying this I’m like wtf is he talking about….
You are absolutely on point when you say that these games should be (relatively) easy to beat, especially given the context of opponent hand ranges, who is a pro and who is not and the 200BB buy-in structure. Also, happy birthday. 🎂
Thanks for the support!
Really great video! Keep up the good content! Thought your breakdowns of each hand was spot on for whatever that's worth. Loved it.
Glad you enjoyed! Awesome!
pretty close to 29 palms! i did some time over there while I was in the Navy, pretty mountains but awful place to live
Damn good video ...
Thanks!
Poker scene out there is pretty easy to clean up. I was out there last year and had two great sessions w easy reads to cash out for about $3500
First time I ever went to PS…if I ever go back… definitely gonna play there again
Good stuff!
Tough to get past the first hand. You bet/jam the flopped straight and expected to get action? Not unless you are against a set, poorly played hand in a typical 2-5 nl.
Nice job. Do some meet ups.
Great idea. It seems that the nuts comes when we just don't really need it that much.
Happy B-Day! Yeah... The games in the desert are beatable
Thanks Bill!
In the queens spot I’m jamming. I truly wish I could give you some high level analysis but at that stack depth my solver has me jam JJ and QQ there often and it’s just something that I’ve memorized.
Works for me!
Will re watch soon, going for Dinner🤑🤑🤑🤑
Awesome!
Hey Alec, were you going to fold T7 hand if your opponent jammed on you?
Game selection. Simply put the lower the stakes, the more tables of said games are in play. This lowers the overall average of the collective "table skillset" for lack of a better term. When you are used to playing at the high level you are frequenting, dropping down is sort of like shooting fish in a barrel. Just my .02
Congrats on deep Run at WSOP Allec
Great video overall! I don't quite understand his math at @14:39 though, "there are twice as many AA, KKs than AQ". There are 4 unseen Aces and 2 unseen queens that makes 8. There are 12 combos of AA, KK (6 each). So it's 1.5 : 1 not 2 : 1 and on the turn it was exactly a coin flip but still super informative video.
Thanks for the content! Love the vids! I swear though, the NE has THE toughest 2/5 tables in North America. Come play Mohegan/foxwoods/twin and tell me what you think. I think $50/hr at those tables is only possible on certain days.
But then again, maybe I just suck 😝😂
Nice, I enjoyed it.
Me as a grinder small stakes pro would not really be getting into many similar spots I think.
I just finished 22 weeks @ 1-3, with an 11.3 K profit in a 100 bb capped buyin, and one thing I take from you here, that with a bigger buyin you can make a much nicer hourly
Thanks
Awesome, congrats on the win!
@@ConsciousPoker Nick Vitucci the scammer that swindle millions of dollars from people in his real estate Seminars 😢
I think you should’ve raised more with the QQ’s to about $150 just to take down the dead money. Suited connectors are calling $55 more.
good stuff from a chat pro
Okay, guess he was cool getting his money in with 2 outs or flipping at best
8:04 I play 2 NL and 5 NL and I'm grimacing. AQ wins 25.56% with only 2 cards to come. Even if this was pre-flop and the other guy had AK, it's about the same, with AQ winning about 25%.
call is a nice play
15:04 but what would you do if he raise-shoves? For me it's probably often a call and a loss when the opponent has a Queen for the stronger Full House.
Fold if he shoves on QQ77 board.
Right.. that’s my question? Because that’s a good time to jam
Something tells me Brad Owen is also wondering about the smaller stakes phenomenon.
The word "smaller" suggests that there is a comparison being made with something else that is larger. In this context, without additional information, it is unclear what is being compared to as the surrounding text does not provide the full picture.
I would probably call as I don't think many combinations of straights like A2 and 67 are plasuable. Maybe, 3 of a kind could play this way but at the same time I think 3 of a kind would just call
Nice video Alec… but.. just say he jammed when the Queen came on the river, you bet the 200.00 putting him on kings or aces.. let’s say instead of him callin the 200.00 him jammed. Realistically a lot of players would jam here. What would your play if the villain jammed and went all in?
Aqua Caliente splashes the pot $80 every morning for hours
Call and let
Him continue to bluff don’t raise to blow him off his hand / draw
The 64 hand looks like your UTG in the graphics.
I straddled. Probably didn't have the option in the replayer.
Because when you move down you don’t care as much so there’s no pressure
10:51 What would I do and why? I would shove. While holding the Queens.
And why?
OK, the options are to raise, fold, or call.
1. Fold option: I wouldn't fold because my hand is too strong, way too strong. I could probably fold AK, AQ, other non-pairs. But I cannot fold a hand like QQ with a runner-runner Flush draw. Simply too strong compared to other hands I might have. I also don't have a tight image.
2. Call option: I wouldn't call because why? The only way a call would help much is if the opponent is entirely bluff-raising, and you haven't called him a maniac. Even if it is a total bluff, there's still a remote chance that the total bluff would outdraw me.
3. Raise: There isn't much left behind, so the raise could be a shove, so I would shove.
Is it profitable to min raise Td7d to want to get into as many hands as you can from the LJ?
Hi Alex, question in relation to your 80/20 video. Say I have a roll of $2k. $1600 goes to cash. $400 to tourneys. But what happens if I play a few sessions of tourneys and I lose $300. My roll is now $1700. But that means that my tourney roll is now $340 or 20%. If I decide to have another few sessions of tourneys and continue losing, it will keep putting a dint in bankroll. How do you manage this?
You'll have to rebalance often. It's a constant adjustment. You'll prob find over time your cash winnings are funding MTT losses :)
Alex was playing live, yet he remembers the stack sizes, and pos in all the hands shown. How is this possible? Is this from taking notes during play?
Alec, why not an exploitative min raise on the flop with the flopped nuts on the first hand? Followed by two small-ish bets on Turn and River?
I always ask myself "how can I get all in against the widest possible range?"
Love the framework and suggestion. Awesome!
For hand #4, I would call. Villain should be polarized here, but since this is a fishy $2/$5 game, he has many worse over pairs in range. I think KK specifically would be inclined to 4-bet you preflop because he doesn't want to give 2 ranges the chance to flop an ace or a set, even if he is the tricky kind. He may have that anxiety to a lesser extent with AA. So his value range is flopped sets and sandbagged AA; he also has 66 and 22 as merges that don't particularly care about stacking off into an over-pair, and he has bluffs, specifically the NFD which is also a gutter. Villain shouldn't even be flatting 33 and 44 here but we know that he is. If he doesn't have the discipline to lay those down preflop, then he probably also thinks that 77 or 88 here is the nuts and/or you're full of shit. So combo-wise, there's at least twice as many worse over pairs in his range compared to nutted combinations, so folding is, I think, out of the question.
Since we're going to pile it, the question is how; the NFD will most likely call off if we jam, reasoning that he has 50% equity (which he does.) Same with the straights. But he might fold the portion of his range that is dead, such as 88, and we don't want that. He may also have some bullshit hand like KJo, and if this is the case, we want to keep him in. So I would call, then pile if he checks any non-heart turn, and call if he shoves. However if the turn is specifically an ace or a heart, we do have to fold to the jam, I think, which is going to happen 22% of the time. If we get some sick live read, or get some good price, maybe we can continue.
But this is worth it given that, say, 50% of the time, we aren't letting him off the hook with 66-JJ, which is going to pay us.
Great feedback!
While you're down there smash that like button. Last night in bed my wife said the exact same thing to me.
You probably, subconsciously or not, play more speculative hands in lower stakes and thus hit those more often?
Right but you miss more often too!
Pretty sure he has 12 combos of AA, KK and 12 combos AQ, It's equally likely, not double. Even at the river is 12 vs 8. If he ever has KQss here, then its off even more.
At 14:00 he says KK is more likely than AA or KK how does he get that math?
2/5 NL In The House!
I am jamming (hand 4)
At $2-$5 I'm jamming he could easily have 7s-10s
I jam with QQ
I will call wt QQ
Alec Bald Torelli
That a 500 cal 2/5 game lol
12:09 🤔🧐 say.........
Call
Ace q is an easy fold wtf 😂
ALEC. The reason you flop the nuts at lower stakes, is because you play too many hands. AND like all players you have a selective memory!!
Where is the audio, I see your lips move but no sound
Separate mic. Must not have synced properly.
64 is not the nuts on an 875 board. You know this. We know you mean the "essential nuts", but sometimes you're up against 96 and it can also get really bad if the turn is a 9 or a 6.
He says “I flopped the nuts or close to it.” He literally corrects himself but you have to be that guy….
@@zekebones34 I missed the "close to it" part, but I'm not that guy because it's important to know that you don't have the nuts. You can be that guy that can't accept criticism.
I acknowledged that! But if I'm beat on this board then GG me lol.
Clearly you should stick to these kind of games ,because at the Hustler stream something is obviously wrong with your game!
Lol did you see last night and the week before? I dominated while being card dead. I've won 4 in a row.
@@ConsciousPoker I was watching you last night…great play…this is what you need to do…congrats!
But the rake looks awful
No limping lol.
I fold QQ there
No way!
Leave it to Torelli to get the poker combos math wrong then try to sell you a course on poker math. On the river there are 6 combos of AA, 6 combos of KK, and 8 combos of AQ.
lol yes, you're right!
I should have specified I discounted some because he doesn't always 3-bet AQo given the fact it's me and positions, whereas he always 3-bets KK/AA. I realize this looks careless on my part and thank you for pointing it out.
Come to think of it, it may actually be closer to 4 combos based on this assumption I'm making. Anyway, my broader point was KK/AA is way more likely than AQ, no matter how you cut the cards.
SoFlo let’s go!! I’ll drop you an email ♠️ 🎉
Awesome!
can i get more info for your personal coaching i went to your instgram but there are you profile not wich one is yours
Hey man, sure thing. I'm @AlecTorelli on Instagram. All the rest are scams. Please be careful!
You can find me at instagram.com/alectorelli
QQ WOULD BE COMPLETELY PLAYER DEPENDENT. OMC FOLD. ANYONE WHO CAN PLAY TAKE A CARD. CRAZY PERSON GET IT IN