100 Proofs Part 61-70
Вставка
- Опубліковано 8 вер 2024
- Article: tinyurl.com/10...
The End Times prophecies, the tyranny of the papacy, the protestant revolution, the identity of the two witness, the woman and the whore in Revelation. These all reveal the true identity of the people of the Bible.
Website: www.Truthvids.net
Bitchute Channel:
www.bitchute.c...
Odysee Channel:
odysee.com/@Tr...
100 Proofs:
tinyurl.com/10...
tinyurl.com/10...
tinyurl.com/10...
tinyurl.com/10...
tinyurl.com/10...
tinyurl.com/10...
tinyurl.com/10...
Do We All Descend From Adam and Eve?
truthvids.net/...
The Migrations of the 12 Tribes To Europe
tinyurl.com/12...
Where Are The 12 Lost Tribes?
tinyurl.com/12...
The Adamic Civilization
tinyurl.com/Ad...
Where is The Tribe of Dan Today?
tinyurl.com/Tr...
What Is The Thousand Year Reign of Christ in Revelation?
tinyurl.com/10...
The Biggest Identity Theft In History
tinyurl.com/Bi...
The Mystery In The Garden of Eden Revealed
tinyurl.com/My...
The Parable of The Wheats and The Tares Explained
tinyurl.com/Wh...
The Classical Civilization
tinyurl.com/Cl...
Rome was sacked at least 4 times by the Germanic people who were growing more and more Christian. One of those great Germanic Christian leaders was Alaric. He had good reason to kill every person in Rome. But he showed them unprecedented mercy and justice, exactly what Jesus would want. And because of Alarics kindness, many Romans wanted to go with the Germanic people
Anyone else feel the urge to raise their right hand in victory after hearing that the rock that is Christendom will last forever, unlike Babylon, unlike Persia, unlike Greece and unlike Rome??
Hallelujah or Praise Yahweh!
AMEN
Ethiopia was white at one time; modern Ethiopians carry an average 40% caucasoid admix in their genome.
I know there is a subset of Cushites who were Caucasians. Thus Moses' first wife.
It's strange how much of our history has been hidden and everyone blindly assumes demographics have never changed and Arabs (Hebrew, "mixed") don't exist.
Clinton, they deleted your reply.
There's also a significant translation issue with Cush where the translators (Masoretics?) mistranslated Cushites to Ethiopians. There was a Cush in Mesopotamia that should never have been confused with the country now known as "Ethiopia".
Yes. But that isnt important,only to remind us that those people killed themselves through miscegenation
@@dancoles2235 This is true! We know this because of the rivers ascribed to this Cush, which aren’t in Africa.
Good work brother. I was researching the very subject… I’ve been working on it for years. You nailed it. I’ve also been saying…. Hey we are being breed out! Nobody cares, and then you get called a racist for even pointing it out. I’m blond with blue eyes. And I have had a crazy life. To the point I had to look up. And Jesus has been teaching me for a long time. I’m so glad to see you videos. It’s like seeing I’m not alone. And somebody else has noticed what I’ve noticed. Thank you Lord! I love you!
Really appreciate your hard work brother! Yahweh Bless!
Hallelujah
Such great timing, I just thought to myself earlier, "We haven't had a new TruthVids video in a while" and after going about my day I check and see this uploaded! My dad and I always enjoy your content together, keep it up 👍🏻
Glad to hear that!
@@TruthVids What happened to your latest video from 5/27? It just disappeared...
@@ashleysix2523 It's back up. A few corrections I had to make.
Tarshish is accepted to be modern Spain and Javan some considered to be Greece (the Isles afar off). UK are Isles afar off as well
I am guessing Judah is Germany and some say the Men of Issachar: The Astounding Story of Finland and Estonia. According to Nordisk Israel, the Tribe of Naphtali is associated with Norway @@lapis3834
Oooof, you always give me hope we're not lost.
Amazing work brother! I'll have to watch this one several times! You really packed it full this time! Thank you and God bless you!🙏❤
Remember you need to study it for yourself as well.
The Bible ALONE tells you who this mystery Babylon is....
END TIMES JERUSALEM
The physical Babylon was destroyed and never to be rebuilt.
There is a spiritual Babylon which is end time Jerusalem from the Bible alone...
Revelation 18:21 - And a mighty angel took up a stone like a great millstone, and cast it into the sea, saying, Thus with violence shall that great city Babylon be thrown down, and shall be found no more at all. .....
......Revelation 18:24 - And in her (Babylon) was found the blood of prophets, and of saints, and of all that were slain upon the earth.
babylon was responsible for the BLOOD of PROPHETS.
Revelation 16:6 - For they have shed the blood of saints and prophets, and thou hast given them blood to drink; for they are worthy.
Revelation 17:6 - And I saw the woman drunken with the blood of the saints, and with the blood of the martyrs of Jesus: and when I saw her, I wondered with great admiration.
Mystery Babylon killed the prophets
Jesus speaking Luke 13:33 - Nevertheless I must walk to day, and to morrow, and the day following: for it cannot be that a prophet perish out of Jerusalem.
for it cannot be that a prophet perish out of Jerusalem.
Jesus in Matthew 23:37 - O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not! Behold, your house is left unto you desolate.
the two end time witnesses of God are mentioned here:
Revelation 11:8 - And their dead bodies shall lie in the street of the great city, which spiritually is called Sodom and Egypt, where also our Lord was crucified.
Jesus, MY LORD was crucified in JERUSALEM, which is spiritually called Sodom and Egypt. NOT Rome or in Mecca or the USA
Do we believe Jesus or commentaries?
How about Paul?
Paul writes in 1 Thess 2:14, 16 - For ye, brethren, became followers of the churches of God which in Judaea are in Christ Jesus: for ye also have suffered like things of your own countrymen, EVEN AS THEY HAVE OF THE JEWS: WHO BOTH KILLED THE LORD JESUS, and their OWN PROPHETS, and have persecuted us; and THEY PLEASE NOT GOD, and are contrary to all men: Forbidding us to speak to the Gentiles that they might be saved, to fill up their sins alway: FOR THE WRATH IS COME UPON THEM TO THE UTTERMOST.
If any can show me from the Bible alone where Rome or Islam killed the prophets please let me know. I hate Rome and know she has murdered many. Islam has killed many but is not mystery babylon.
However Jerusalem is also built on 7 hills as is Moscow (communism) and Istanbul (islam) and Seattle (microsoft)
Matthew 23:34 - Wherefore, behold, I send unto you prophets, and wise men, and scribes: and some of them ye shall kill and crucify; and some of them shall ye scourge in your synagogues, and persecute them from city to city:
Mat 23:35 - That upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zacharias son of Barachias, whom ye slew between the temple and the altar.
Mat 23:36 - Verily I say unto you, All these things shall come upon this generation.
Matthew 23:37 - O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not!
Behold, your house is left unto you desolate.
Revelation 18:24 - And in her (babylon) was found the blood of prophets, and of saints, and of all that were slain upon the earth.
babylon was responsible for the BLOOD of PROPHETS.
Jesus speaking
Luke 13:33 - Nevertheless I must walk to day, and to morrow, and the day following: for it cannot be that a prophet perish out of Jerusalem.
Jesus in Matthew 23:37 - O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not! Behold, your house is left unto you desolate.
Maybe I'm misunderstanding, I hope you aren't confusing new Jerusalem with "end times Jerusalem". The Jerusalem of Jesus' day was completely under the rule of Edom, and therefore the serpent race, the children of Cain, who had begun to infiltrate the government from the beginning.
"Now a certain man of the servants of Saul was there that day, detained before the LORD; and his name was Doeg, an Edomite, the chiefest of the herdmen that belonged to Saul." 1Sa 21:7
And of course there were always serpent race Canaanites there.
"And the LORD was with Judah; and he drave out the inhabitants of the mountain; but could not drive out the inhabitants of the valley, because they had chariots of iron.
And they gave Hebron unto Caleb, as Moses said: and he expelled thence the three sons of Anak.
And the children of Benjamin did not drive out the Jebusites that inhabited Jerusalem; but the Jebusites dwell with the children of Benjamin in Jerusalem unto this day." Judg 1:19-21
Thus Paul could refer to the coming destruction of Jerusalem by Jesus' Roman kinsmen (Dan 9:25-26, Rom 4:1 & 12), as "bruising Satan" under their feet. (And NOT as anything being done to Israelites)
"And the God of peace shall bruise Satan under your feet shortly. The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with you. Amen." Rom 16:20
1Thess 2:14-16 also describes Judaea as a whole, and therefore what happened in it, as the responsibility of the serpent seed usurpers.
"For ye, brethren, became followers of the churches of God which in Judaea are in Christ Jesus: for ye also have suffered like things of your own countrymen, even as they have of the Judaeans:
Who both killed the Lord Jesus,
And their own prophets,
And have persecuted us;
And they please not God,
And are contrary to all men:
Forbidding us to speak to the nations that they might be saved,
To fill up their sins alway:
For the wrath is come upon them to the uttermost."
Contrast this to the same Paul's description of Israelites:
"Who are Israelites;
To whom pertaineth the adoption,
And the glory,
And the covenants,
And the giving of the law,
And the service of God,
And the promises;
Whose are the fathers,
And of whom as concerning the flesh Christ came, who is over all, God blessed for ever. Amen." Rom 9:4-5
In case that's not clear enough:
"And now I stand and am judged for the hope of the promise made of God unto our fathers:
Unto which promise our twelve tribes, instantly serving God day and night, hope to come. For which hope's sake, king Agrippa, I am accused of the Judaeans." Act 26:6-7
Jesus in Matthew 23 refers to those who kill the prophets and are responsible for all the righteous blood shed on earth as "serpents, offspring of vipers", and begins their death tally with righteous Abel, identifying the killers of the prophets as the line of Cain.
"Wherefore ye be witnesses unto yourselves, that ye are the children of them which killed the prophets.
Fill ye up then the measure of your fathers.
Ye serpents, ye offspring of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell?
Wherefore, behold, I send unto you prophets, and wise men, and scribes: and some of them ye shall kill and crucify; and some of them shall ye scourge in your synagogues, and persecute them from city to city:
That upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zacharias son of Barachias, whom ye slew between the temple and the altar.
Verily I say unto you, All these things shall come upon this race." Mat 23:31-36
Unfortunately, just like now, infiltrating Israelite governments and institutions was a primary goal of Satan's children. So, the inhabitants of Jerusalem would have looked a lot like the capital cities of the West today - filled with briars and thorns. The Shelanites, the descendants of Judah and the Canaanite woman, would have no doubt inhabited Jerusalem as well. 125 years before Jesus was born the entire nation of Edom was brought into Judaea, (Josephus, Antiquities 13.9.1, Jewish Encyclopedia Edox/Idumea) so Jerusalem would have been teeming with Canaanites, Shelanites, and Edomites by the time of Jesus and the apostles.
THE NEW JERUSALEM IS THE BRIDE OF CHRIST:
"And I John saw THE HOLY CITY, NEW JERUSALEM, coming down from God out of heaven, PREPARED AS A BRIDE ADORNED FOR HER HUSBAND."
"And he carried me away in the spirit to a great and high mountain, and shewed me THAT GREAT CITY, THE HOLY JERUSALEM, descending out of heaven from God,
Having the glory of God: and her light was like unto a stone most precious, even like a jasper stone, clear as crystal;
And had a wall great and high, and had twelve gates, and at the gates twelve angels, and names written thereon, WHICH ARE THE NAMES OF THE TWELVE TRIBES OF THE CHILDREN OF ISRAEL:
On the east three gates; on the north three gates; on the south three gates; and on the west three gates.
And the wall of the city had twelve foundations, and in them THE NAMES OF THE TWELVE APOSTLES OF THE LAMB." Rev 21:2, 10-14
@@doxholiday1372 agreed all you wrote - yes I wrote about end time Jerusalem and present day Jerusalem full of serpent seed
@@ChaplainBobWalkerBTh Amen.
Makes sense, as Babylon shall also be spiritually as Sodom and Gomorrah. Tell me the pedophile capital of the world cannot be likened to such a place where sodomy abounded (and pedophilia is undeniably linked with sodomy). Thank you for the references.
Thanks brother for all your work
Micah describes Sweden so well...."And America and other EU countrues offcourse :( Yahweh bless u all
Given the fact that Yahweh told our Israelite ancestors that they needed priests, you cant really blame our Christian ancestors for following these false Levites. It's kind of in their blood. They needed someone to remind them that Christ is, was and forever will be the ultimate king, priest, teacher, brother, etc
This was to be replaced by fellowship. In doing so, ensuring each person experience a personal relationship with God.
I see it when they bow to Rome on a SUNday....... But is the curse of mankind to seek that which is an easy path, and one we don't have to stick out like a sore thumb.... The Colossians spoke to about Sabbaths etc...knew quite well Paul was telling them don't let your still pagan kinsmen chide you about keeping the Sabbath, REMEMBER? Another Key to your true identity...
Gentile - Israelite without God. Distinct from pagan. Gentile - "the nations" of who? Ethnos - "people of common history, culture, language, race, religion." Gentile means the Godless nations of common culture, history, language, race, and religion as Israel. Thus the purpose of the Apostles to find the lost sheep and bring them back to God.
Hi Truthvids, are you aware that your link to Lion's site goes to his old frozen site rather than his new one.
Thank you I'll fix it.
Knowing about cain = I am impressed. Tares among the wheat.
Yep. George Soros and Bill Gates are pretty clear Edomite Canaanites. It's the cryptos that look more like Ryan Reynolds, Jake Gyllenhaal, Scarlet Johansson, Jennifer Connelly, etc that you have to watch out for
@@LukeLovesRose yep when the cainites intermarry they take on our physical characteristics.
?
Genesis 4
King James Version
4 And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from the Lord.
I keep trying to see where people are getting this serpent seed doctrine but it isn't in my bible anywhere....1611 kjv.
@@LukeLovesRose I think they are from the line of Esau.
2 Esdras 6:9
“For Esau is the end of the world, and Jacob is the beginning of it that followeth.”
@@jskyg68 They most definitely are from the cursed line of Esau.
so THATS where the hydra comes from!
this puts captain americas "hail hydra" thing in a different light...dam hollywood. damned jews.
👍🙏👏
I think you meant, 👍🏻🙏🏻👏🏻
@@MissDarleneRae am from Florida and am sun burnt 🌞 🥵👍🙏👏🐊🦞🦀🌴🌴🌴🥥🌊🏊♂️🏖
I'm glad you teach Wilson and Blacketts work, because sadly not enough know about it
Right on brother 🙏
Some other teachers of Yahweh you can look up are William Potter Gale, Wesley A. Swift, Bernardt Comparet, and James P. Wickstrom. I have found they also fill in a lot of Gaps. From a historical perspective the UA-cam channel Asha Logos posts a lot of good stuff. Yahweh bless my Aryan Israelite Brothers and sisters!
what do you make of this?
2 Esdras 6:9
“For Esau is the end of the world, and Jacob is the beginning of it that followeth.”
Personally I don't believe the serpent seed doctrine, I believe Esua is at war with us attempting to steal back the birthright.
Obadiah
1 The vision of Obadiah. Thus saith the Lord God concerning Edom; We have heard a rumour from the Lord, and an ambassador is sent among the heathen, Arise ye, and let us rise up against her in battle.
2 Behold, I have made thee small among the heathen: thou art greatly despised.
3 The pride of thine heart hath deceived thee, thou that dwellest in the clefts of the rock, whose habitation is high; that saith in his heart, Who shall bring me down to the ground?
4 Though thou exalt thyself as the eagle, and though thou set thy nest among the stars, thence will I bring thee down, saith the Lord.
5 If thieves came to thee, if robbers by night, (how art thou cut off!) would they not have stolen till they had enough? if the grapegatherers came to thee, would they not leave some grapes?
6 How are the things of Esau searched out! how are his hidden things sought up!
7 All the men of thy confederacy have brought thee even to the border: the men that were at peace with thee have deceived thee, and prevailed against thee; they that eat thy bread have laid a wound under thee: there is none understanding in him.
8 Shall I not in that day, saith the Lord, even destroy the wise men out of Edom, and understanding out of the mount of Esau?
9 And thy mighty men, O Teman, shall be dismayed, to the end that every one of the mount of Esau may be cut off by slaughter.
10 For thy violence against thy brother Jacob shame shall cover thee, and thou shalt be cut off for ever.
I hesitate at the literal serpent seed doctrine as well, but agree with the Edomite-origins doctrine. It can easily overlap with the serpent seed doctrine, but stands firmly independently as well. One thing many people do not know is that during the Hasmonian dynasty, the last independent Israelite kingdom (Judea ruled by the Hasmonians after the Maccabbean rebellion against the Seleucids), the ancient Edomite enemies were finally conqured by the Judeans (presumably true Israelites at the time). However, the Edomites were allowed to "convert" (pretty much be circumcised and compelled to make some profession). This allowed for a famous Edomite named Antipater to rise to prominence in Idumea-Judea and conspire with the Romans to ultimately establish a new Edomite dynasty ruling over Judea. Antipater's son was Herod the Great. The Herodian dynasty purged the Sanhedrin/priesthood and thus allowed for a great dark work to be performed in which the priesthood was corrupted by Edomites. By the time of Christ, I believe there were mostly Edomite appointees in the priestly offices, perhaps a few legitimate Levites left, but mostly Edomite control-freaks.
Now here is a theory that coincides with that historical information that could be wrong, but might be so parallel that it is mind blowing...
We know as Christians that we were blessed by the Holy Spirit after Christ's ascension. We also ought to know from Revelation 12 (if it could be taught upon correctly instead of being an "origin story for Lucifer") that after Christ's ascension, Satan was cast from Heaven in his role as accuser. The role of Satan changed. If the Holy Spirit was given to Christians, then it seems feasible that demonic forces might find use for physical hosts and that the most ideal candidate would be counterfeit, blaspheming, synagogue of Satan antichrists. This is actually the best theory I've encountered for explaining the near-hive-mind-like behavior of the antichrists mentioned in Revelation 2:9. How are they all able to be so evil in conjunction with each other if they aren't all getting memos from some Satanic world conference in Davos? Possibly because they are directed by a spiritual force that found an ideal host in a wicked bloodline... the accursed line of Esau mixed with the other various accursed bloodlines.
So you believe in a Esau bloodline but for some reason can’t fathom this go all the way back to the garden?
@@karlwoods8994 Genesis 4
4 And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from the Lord.
It says what it says..
@@karlwoods8994 no, I can fathom it. I'm just not thoroughly convinced. One hesitation is because of the reasonable implications of that manner of translation that supports the serpent seed bloodline. If the trees were all bloodlines, and the first patriarchs were able to consume from all but one, then it strikes me as contradictory to the marriage covenant ordained by God for Adam and Eve. I'm open to counterpoints.
@Dan Coles Actually Esau and the Edomites prove the serpent seed - which btw is taken straight from the bible, so I fail to see why anyone would hesitate to accept it. "And I will put enmity between thy (the serpent's) seed (offspring), and the seed (offspring) of the woman (Eve)..." Gen 3:15. If Esau's wives were direct descendants of Adam there would be no reason for God to choose Jacob, the second born son, over the firstborn who was supposed to inherit the covenant - based on his own Law. He wouldn't have allowed Jacob to succeed with his ruse, in fact there wouldn't have been a ruse, because Isaac and Rebekah wouldn't have been "grieved of mind because of the wives of Esau", Rebekah wouldn't have despaired of her life "should Jacob take a wife of the daughters of the land", and she wouldn't have seen the need to intervene. Everyone born of Adam is born corrupted in the sense of inheriting Adam's nature after transgressing, so that wasn't the issue with Esau, and preference doesn't override Law. God doesn't violate his own laws, so that tells us there had to be something else that made it impossible for Esau to inherit the Covenant from Abraham and Issac. There would be no reason for Paul to refer to Esau as a fornicator, which Jude links with the fallen angels and "going after strange flesh". Esau married his wives, so fornication can't be "sex before marriage" as modern baal priests tell us, especially considering sex is marriage according to the bible. Becoming one flesh. If he had, we would have been told about it.
The ONLY reason Esau wasn't able to inherit the covenant was due to not having any viable offspring capable of inheriting it. The Christ couldn't be born through a genetically corrupt seedline, it had to be 100% Adam.
If the Edomites weren't the seed of the serpent, Herod, an Edomite, wouldn't be depicted as the Dragon/Satan/Serpent in Revelation.
Jesus wouldn't have called the Edomites of John 8:44 children of the devil, who he identified as Cain.
And he wouldn't hold their SEEDLINE whom he called SERPENTS, OFFSPRING OF VIPERS, responsible for all the shed blood of the righteous from Abel to Zechariah in Matt 23.
There's no getting around that last two. He not only calls Edomites serpents and the offspring of serpents, (ie SERPENT'S SEED) but he holds them responsible for a murder committed thousands of years before Esau was born. No Edomites were involved in murdering Abel.
"Wherefore ye be witnesses unto yourselves, that ye are the children of them which killed the prophets.
Fill ye up then the measure of your fathers.
Ye serpents, ye offspring of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell?
Wherefore, behold, I send unto you prophets, and wise men, and scribes: and some of them ye shall kill and crucify; and some of them shall ye scourge in your synagogues, and persecute them from city to city:
That upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zacharias son of Barachias, whom ye slew between the temple and the altar.
Verily I say unto you, All these things shall come upon this race." Mat 23:31-36
Who are the hidden Edomite enemy within you can't mention, who opened up the floodgates ?
Wake up !
"So shall they fear the name of the LORD from the west, and his glory from the rising of the sun. When the enemy shall come in like a flood, the Spirit of the LORD shall lift up a standard against him." (Isaiah 59:19). .,
With great blessing comes much responsibility , both loving Yahweh and being a blessing and a light unto the nations! And the Israelite nations have done much, yet there is more to do, the first thing is to restore these nations upon the foundation of Yahweh, In America they say Make America Great Again, what many feel is that to make America great again you have to make America Godly again and all else will be added unto her... Remember Yahweh as is his custom uses his people to accomplish earthly things, God always raised a restorer... when you find the restorer in your nation you should stand by him and know that if God anointed him his enemies will fall.. regardless of your personal opinion of who Yahweh may choose... At times he chose evil men to rule to levy judgement for straying from Yahweh... Pharaoh was just once such example...but it woke people up... I believe JOE was allowed to usurp the throne, yes it was stolen, but Yahweh allowed it, so that many more could see their evil and to choose between Good or true Evil.... As Satan hurls false accusations at Trump ...isn't it funny that those very judges have and will hang themselves by Haman's proverbial Gallows... so many coincidences surrounding Trump too many to ignore... To those that slander Trump i wonder if they would have slandered King David, Moses, Abraham, etc... since they too were like Trump imperfect sinful men... the difference between Trump and Joe...Joe ans his handlers revel in their Evil and set themselves above God, and only profess to Know Yahweh when it gets them something... BTW..The Roman church is about as evil as it gets...They changed times and laws...etc...find yourself back to the Sabbath and stop the flimsy ridiculous excuses...
Bien IS chewish trump is chewish. I dont see how they Will make America great. Will Trump make America whyte and follow god laws? If not, he is not our guy.
Our crusaders were seduced and corrupted when they entered the Middle East. It's kind of perfect actually. They were so successful driving the invaders out of Greece and Sicily but they were turned bad when they got into the now unholy land
What are you talking about. They literally sacked and rampaged all the way from greece to Anatolia and attacked the Byzantines who were the oldest christian state in the world
@@jacekstepinski5245 Clearing out the Arabs
@@LukeLovesRose clearing up the Romans, Greeks, Isaurians and least of all - turks, not arabs. Read up about the IVth crusade and the sack of constantinopole in 1204. Even during the first crusade and the subsequent Norman invasions of greece the crusaders besieged Dyrrachium - an all christian on the rast Coast of the Adriatic sea
@@jacekstepinski5245 Nope. Arabs
@@LukeLovesRose pick up a book
I enjoy these videos very much. My work involves audio engineering to some degree, and I'd like to invite you to turn down the gain on your mic, so as to avoid distortion, of which there is quite a lot.
Thank you, I will give it a try.
At 27:20 you mention that Eve was seduced by the serpent and became pregnant by the serpent with Cain. Where is this in the Bible or any of the other books. This part lost me. anyone have an answer to this?
Eve said she was seduced (beguiled) by the serpent. (Satan) She further stated she had gotten a man from the "lord" (Baal = Satan) Cain is not in Adam's lineage per Gensis chapter 5.
Genesis 3:13 “And God said unto the woman, What is this that thou hast done? And the woman said *The serpent beguiled me, and I did eat.”*
Strong's Concordance H5377 nâshâʼ, naw-shaw'; a primitive root; to lead astray, i.e. (mentally) to delude, or (morally) *to seduce, beguile* deceive, × greatly, × utterly.
Revelation 12:9 “And *the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan* which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.”
Genesis 4:1, KJV: And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said *I have gotten a man from the LORD*
Strong's Concordance *baal: owner, lord* Original Word: בַּעַל Baʻal, bah'-al; the same as H1167; Baal, a Phoenician deity:-Baal, (plural) Baalim.
Genesis 5:3-5 3 And *Adam lived an hundred and thirty years, and begat a son in his own likeness, and after his image; and called his name Seth*
4 *And the days of Adam after he had begotten Seth* were eight hundred years: and he begat sons and daughters:
5 And all the days that Adam lived were nine hundred and thirty years: and he died.
6 And Seth lived an hundred and five years, and begat Enos:
Everywhere in the bible from Genesis to Revelation, and many extra biblical texts, but over the millenniums the information about it in the bible has been purposely watered down and obscured by the very people it describes (Jer 8:8), beginning with the text of Genesis 3:6 & 4:1 being altered to make it seem like Cain was Adam's son. So, you're going to have to research to understand the truth.
"The Interpreter’s Bible, a twelve volume collaborative work of 36 ‘consulting editors’, plus 124 other ‘contributors’, makes the following observation on this verse, vol. 1, page 517:
“Cain seems originally to have been the ancestor of the Kenites ... The meaning of the name is ‘metalworker’ or ‘smith’; here, however, it is represented as a derivation of a word meaning ‘acquire’, ‘get’ - one of the popular etymologies frequent in Genesis - hence the mother’s words I have gotten a man. ‘From the Lord’ (KJV) is a rendering, following the LXX and Vulg., of ’eth Yahweh, which is literally, ‘with Yahweh’, and so unintelligible here (the help of [RSV] is not in the Hebrew). It seems probable that ’eth should be ’oth - so, ‘the mark of Yahweh’ - and that the words are a gloss ...”
Secondly, The Interpreter’s One-Volume Commentary On The Bible, edited by Charles M. Laymon, makes the following comment on this passage, on page 6: “... under circumstances which are obscure (vs. 1b can scarcely be translated, still less understood). His younger brother was named Abel, which suggests the Hebrew word for breath.”
Therefore, if Genesis 4:1 is “unintelligible” and “can scarcely be translated, still less understood”, how can one prove anything by quoting it? Additionally, if the words are a gloss, where is the foundation for such a premise? It should then be quite obvious that we need to look somewhere else for the answer.
"And the woman saw Sammael, the angel of death, and she was afraid and knew that the tree was good for food, and that it was a remedy for the enlightenment of the eyes, and that the tree was to be desired to make one wise. She took of its fruit and ate and also gave (it) to her husband and he ate.” Gen 3:6, Aramaic Targum
“And Adam knew that his wife Eve had conceived from Sammael the Angel (of death) and she became pregnant and bore Cain. And he was like those on high and not like those below. And she said: ‘I have got a man from the angel of the LORD’.” Gen 4:1, Aramaic Targum
This rendition of Genesis 4:1 is interesting, for it speaks of the “angel of death” plus “like those on high” and “like those below.” This seems to accord with John 8:23, where Yahshua told the Canaanite variety of “Jews”: “... Ye are from beneath; and I am from above: ye are of this world; I am not of this world.”
"And Adam knew his wife Eve, who had desired the Angel; and she conceived, and bare Cain; and she said, I have acquired a man, the angel of the Lord ...” Gen 4:1, Palestinian Targum
It would appear from those references that the problem with Genesis 4:1 is an omission of some of the words of the Hebrew text. I will now quote Genesis 4:1 from the King James Version and I will add the potentially needed words from the Targum of Jonathan:
“And Adam knew his wife Eve, who was pregnant by Sammael, and she conceived and bare Cain, and he was like the heavenly beings, and not like earthly beings, and she said, I have gotten a man from the angel of the Lord.”
Clarke’s Commentary, volume 1, page 58, suggests a contextual problem with Genesis 4:1 as opposed to 1 John 3:12, and being aware that the meaning of the Greek word “wicked” in this instance means “Satan” says the following: “... Unless she had been under Divine inspiration she could not have called her son (even supposing him to be the promised seed) Jehovah; and that she was not under such an influence her mistake sufficiently proves, for Cain, so far [remote] from being the Messiah, was of the wicked one; I John 3:12 ...”
(Taken from Clifton Emahiser's 'The Problem With Genesis 4:1')'
"Another parable put he forth unto them, saying, The kingdom of heaven is likened unto A MAN WHICH SOWED GOOD SEED IN HIS FIELD:
But while men slept, HIS ENEMY CAME AND SOWED TARES AMONG THE WHEAT, and went his way.
But when the blade was sprung up, AND BROUGHT FORTH FRUIT, THEN APPEARED THE TARES ALSO.
So the servants of the householder came and said unto him, Sir, didst not thou sow good seed in thy field? FROM WHENCE THEN HATH IT TARES?
He said unto them, AN ENEMY HATH DONE THIS. The servants said unto him, Wilt thou then that we go and gather them up?
But he said, Nay; lest while ye gather up the tares, ye root up also the wheat with them.
LET BOTH GROW TOGETHER UNTIL THE HARVEST: and in the time of harvest I will say to the reapers, Gather ye together first the tares, and bind them in bundles to burn them: but gather the wheat into my barn."
"Then Jesus sent the multitude away, and went into the house: and his disciples came unto him, saying, DECLARE UNTO US THE PARABLE OF THE TARES OF THE FIELD.
He answered and said unto them, HE THAT SOWETH THE GOOD SEED IS THE SON OF MAN;
THE FIELD IS THE WORLD; THE GOOD SEED ARE THE CHILDREN OF THE KINGDOM; BUT THE TARES ARE THE CHILDREN OF THE WICKED ONE;
THE ENEMY THAT SOWED THEM IS THE DEVIL; the harvest is the end of the world; and the reapers are the angels.
As therefore the tares are gathered and burned in the fire; so shall it be in the end of this world." Mat 13:24-30, 36-40
"But he answered and said, Every plant, which my heavenly Father hath not planted, shall be rooted up." Mat 15:13
God created/planted Adam and Eve, and gave them the ability to reproduce, therefore they and their direct descendants were planted by God. Anyone not planted by God had to be planted by someone else.
"And he said unto them, Ye are from beneath; I am from above: ye are of this world; I am not of this world." Jn 8:23
Adam and Eve were created by God, and therefore from above, thus Jesus', a direct descendant of Adam, is also from above, but others were created in the world - from beneath. Jesus never told Nicodemus he needed to be "born again" what he actually said was "born from above" - that those who enter the kingdom are those who were born from above, ie descended from Adam who was created by God...unlike Cain who was created by the serpent beneath. (btw serpent is a nickname, not meant to be taken literally, otherwise Jesus wouldn't have called PEOPLE "serpents" in Mat 23. Besides, in Revelation we're told the serpent is the devil and satan)
"And now also the axe is laid unto the root of the trees: therefore every tree which bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire." Mat 3:10
By itself, and without other knowledge it could seem like there's a choice...but...
"A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit." Mat 7:18
According to Jesus only a good tree can bring forth good fruit, and only a corrupt tree can bring forth evil fruit. Trees bring forth what they are, they reproduce themselves. Just like an Orange tree brings forth Orange fruit, and therefore seeds for more Orange trees, a Corrupt tree brings forth Corrupt fruit, and therefore seeds for more Corrupt trees. Trees can't choose which type of fruit they bear - it's pre programmed within themselves based on what they are.
It's everywhere in the bible but people have been trained to miss it, mostly by "spiritualizing" the text. Everything that teaches the seduction of Eve by the devil and everything that naturally follows from it is claimed to mean something other than what it actually says. People need to start taking Jesus at his word, believe him, and stop manipulating the things he's said to fit a preconceived belief that everyone came from Adam.
@@doxholiday1372 2 Peter 3:9
Although I'm having the wildest experience about my blood, my heritage and ancestry etc. Because I found crests of both my maternal as my paternal side of the fam dating back to the 1400s coming from the same place where I was born! An old starfortcity (go figure, dont know if there's a correlation there) I'm still mindblown. I can even trace back the zebulon tribe from mum and the ephraim from my dad's. On the crests. Unfortunately they both died when I was 25. So I can't ask, but my grandad is 95 and he has some info of his parents and grandparents.
Everything seems to align, and then to say that I was not religious minded in a traditional Christian way up until 2 or maybe 3 years ago is yeah pfiiieuw.
I've been somewhat righteous in my own way, I think I can say. Did crazy stuff in my early 20s, nothing too crazy. Got too drunk, smoked a joint. That sort of stuff. Afterwardsi got married, children with the same wife I met when I was 23. We're 18 years married now and still going strong. But not religious, very atheist actually. Funny to say the least.
But dude, the end sounds very bleak.
No salvation for anybody else besides the lost tribes? Are the rules that strict? I hope not at least.
I know we're in for hardship, don't get me wrong.
Great content, thank you.
Thank you for sharing about yourself. Sorry about your struggle to salvage your family history. It is fascinating to examine the overlap between the heritage/physical/political realm and that of the metaphysical. I think dogma has been an obstacle for many of our ethnic brethren that value their heritage, but are hesitant to profess religious beliefs that strike them as foreign. In order to avoid repeating dogma that I'm confident you've heard already, I'll try to answer your questions from a scriptural perspective and with minimal interpretation, though the semantics of many terms used for these topics gets complicated quickly.
Yes; the end does appear very bleak to many. As personal death seems to individual mortality, the end times of this world seems to general "eschatology". The clearest depiction of how this will transpire is given in the book of Revelation (despite it being a very complicated book to study in general, it has a very clear passage regarding the final judgement at the end times). Basically, all the dead shall be gathered before the great white throne. Many books shall be read (presumably of their deeds [and thoughts]). Only one book is mentioned specifically, however, for determining the destination for the judged: the book of life. This is in other prophetic passages clearly a book under the authority of Christ... it is his book. As our kinsmen redeemer, everyone whose name is found in this book is spared the judgement of those whose name is not found. The latter, like chaff, are cast into the lake of fire where also the devil, false prophet, death, etc. are cast. This is good news, because we are given a vision of justice, finality, establishment of a perfect new heaven and new earth, the end of sorrows. How do we ensure our names are in the book of life though?
I dare not add on to scripture that I revere as inspired; it is not me that will be reading from that book of life, nor me that will be sitting upon the throne. But I know that the one that will be reading from that book and sitting upon that throne was incarnated as Christ before his crucifixion, burial, resurrection, and ascension. Some Christians that teach along this doctrine (that evident from the video, which might be called "Christian Identity" but might be better called Israelite Identity Christianity) teach that Christ will save all of his kindred people (despite their profession of faith or lack thereof). Others teach that we should still be professing/confessing Christ as our savior, the messiah, God incarnate, etc. I do not know for sure, but want to share what I hope you will appreciate.
If you value your heritage and can lovingly see that the scriptures, prophecies, and faith of our brethren has value, bears fruit, and is not as foreign as first appears, you can see a beauty and hope in the gospel that our people can be redeemed. We are a rebellious people with a tendency to stray from God's truth and law. He loves us and provides us with a path for redemption. He has given us more gifts than we can count, including the gift of scripture, which is loaded with good news about our redemption, salvation, how to love each other better, and guidance for so much more. On the topic of judgement, about which you asked, Ephesians 2 states: [8] For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: [9] Not of works, lest any man should boast.
You asked if Salvation was only for the lost tribes and if the rules were that strict. Salvation is a gift of God to all his people, and that would include the covenant tribes and probably any Adamic tribes grafted with the Israelite tribes. His people are like sheep that know the shepherd's voice. The rules are strict because the very meaning of salvation is tied to the idea of a sanctuary being established as a refuge from the wild. It is a refuge because there must be a door and barrier to the chaos of the desert wilderness of death. But we know that despite the strictness of the rules, we should not despair at strictness, for we have a God of justice that is holy and will not make an error in judgement. He has the power over all creation and has provided a means for all manner of sin to be forgiven so that we may have eternal life with him, so don't let strictness be a deterrent.
All Adamites were created with a drive to worship. Some people even worship themselves as idols. We will all worship something. For what you worship, you will sacrifice. If you are going to sacrifice anything (since you can't keep it all anyways), make sure you are making an investment that will yield fruit. I guarantee you that if you seek Christ, he will bless you, help you, answer your prayers, and that nothing about which you might be afraid to give up now will seem worthy in the end of having been a stumbling block. A long time ago, I was very resistant to God and if someone had tried to persuade me to seek God and what it might "cost", I might have hesitated, because I want to keep what I "enjoy" or "makes me comfortable". But I realize that whatever I give up in this world is nothing compared to what God has done for us. If I could give up every possession and die hungry, early, and painfully for him (if he were to even ask it of me), it wouldn't compare to what I owe him and wish I could pay him back with gratitude. My old testimony for being a Christian was that I was challenged to test putting my faith in him to see how it worked out, and it worked out, and I wanted to list all the reasons I have found great truth in scriptures. My revised testimony after over 2 decades is that I can say with absolute confidence that if you put your faith in Christ, love him, love your brethren, seek him... you will not regret it; you will have true joy and gratitude. What he tells us to do is what is best for us and best for all his children. He loves us enough to initiate reconciliation despite our rebellion. When we are in the afterlife, we will have a unique song in contrast with the angels, the song of the redeemed that will echo in eternity in praise for the loving mercy of God. Even hints at it now can bring tears of joy and appreciation to those that see it.
You're misunderstanding. Only the tribes of Israel had the old Covenant and the Law, so only the tribes of Israel needed to be redeemed from the punishment for violating the covenant and the Law. The other Adamic nations and tribes simply inherited death from Adam, which Christ reversed through his resurrection. (sin is transgression of the Law) People have this bad habit of reading the bible as if it was written to and about everyone, rather than what it is, prophetic utterances given to the children of Israel.
Genesis 1-11 records pre Abrahamic events, but only to explain the creation of the earth and the history of Adam's descendants to the Israelites. The brevity given to the creation and the thousands of years of history that occurred prior to Abraham speaks for itself.
@@doxholiday1372 what do you think about the idea that the lost tribes were grafted in with all other non-corrupted Adamic lines? I believe there is scriptural and historical support for that point.
@Dan Coles I'm not sure if you're referring to what Paul said about the wild and natural olive trees being graffed together, or if you're just using the term to refer to assimilation. Grafting is only mentioned once, and it's a reference to the Israelites living among the nations that grew as a wild olive tree being graffed into the natural olive tree, the Israelite remnant in Judaea at the time. They're both olive trees, from the same original olive tree, but one grew in the wilderness apart from the commonwealth of Israel, and the other remained where God planted them. Due to the Israelite civil war during the time of David the 12 tribes split into 2 distinct houses, the 10 tribe House of Israel, and the 2 tribe House of Judah, at which time God began judging and dealing with them separately. Through the New Covenant they became united again as 1 tree.
He did speak of sowing the house of Israel with the seed of Adam at one point, but due to certain blessings regarding reproduction, and due to their destiny to be as numerous as the sand of the sea and the stars of heaven children of Israel always end up absorbing the non Israelites from Adam, and the Israelite line prevails.
@@doxholiday1372 thanks for the reply brother. Yes; I'm referring to grafting of Israelites to other uncorrupted Adamite-Sethian lines like non-Canaanite Hamites and Japhethetites. I believe in the massive Israelite migrations but it is challenging to trace all the ancient ancestors and say with accuracy that everyone that looks a certain way definitely descends from the 12, but I do believe that descendants of the 12 were scattered amongst uncorrupted lines of kinfolk and the non-Israelites that were not mamzers may have been grafted in.
How are there no linguistic links to the Middle East? I definitely believe we are the chosen people but this one stumps me.
There are MANY linguistic links to the Middle East and I'll be glad to try to share some of what I know to help you. The easiest way to see the most obvious link is look up the "Phoenician" script and compare to another script that might be called paleoHebrew, protoHebrew, or paleoSinaitic (pardon my spelling if its wrong, but I'm typing so much today I'm going off memory). You will notice that these all appear about identical, aside from how the symbols are rotated for perspective. The next thing to do is look at ancient Greek and compare that with the previous scripts you already found to be near identical. Frankly, that point alone and its implications should be convincing enough of the linguistic links since Latin was based on Greek, the Futharks based on Latin script, etc. However, another useful key to remember is that there were foreign scripts and peoples in the "Middle East" before the covenant peoples, during their time, and after. So when you look at non-shemitic/semitic scripts from the area in archaeology, those might be foreign even if they are also Adamite (such as Japhethetic and non-Canaanite Hamitic). An encyclopedia could probably be filled with other links, so I'm aiming to hit some major highlights. But another thing I've found is that when "experts" classify lingual groups, they abuse categorical groups for their language families by using terms from the Bible, but totally misapplying them. For example, they will call Arabic and various Canaanitic languages "Semitic", despite their people not descending from Shem. These categories are confused by infiltrators in academia that have even been caught lying about their findings. The connections between the PIE language families (and common mythos) and paleoHebrew are strong however. The problem with seeing it all clearly is that we are talking about thousands of years of letters and stories changing as people moved. But like I said earlier, the Greek-"Phoenician" connection is quite clear, the two areas were very close to each other, and Hellenes resided in the holy land and stretching from Egypt/Mizraim to "India". Our peoples' mark is all over the old world, but our people had to flee from the dragon into the wilderness as they were being pursued by floods.
Another great, interesting video.
Check out the works of Dr. William G. Finlay. He taught a lot of what is in this video series.
Name of the music at 19:10?
Can someone give me the scripture about Israel becoming more powerful as they travel further from the land of Canaan?
Isaiah 54
1 Sing, O barren, thou that didst not bear; break forth into singing, and cry aloud, thou that didst not travail with child: for more are the children of the desolate than the children of the married wife, saith the LORD.
2 Enlarge the place of thy tent, and let them stretch forth the curtains of thine habitations: spare not, lengthen thy cords, and strengthen thy stakes;
3 For thou shalt break forth on the right hand and on the left; and thy seed shall inherit the nations, and make the desolate cities to be inhabited.
4 Fear not; for thou shalt not be ashamed: neither be thou confounded; for thou shalt not be put to shame: for thou shalt forget the shame of thy youth, and shalt not remember the reproach of thy widowhood any more.
5 For thy Maker is thine husband; the LORD of hosts is his name; and thy Redeemer the Holy One of Israel; The God of the whole earth shall he be called.
6 For the LORD hath called thee as a woman forsaken and grieved in spirit, and a wife of youth, when thou wast refused, saith thy God.
7 For a small moment have I forsaken thee; but with great mercies will I gather thee.
8 In a little wrath I hid my face from thee for a moment; but with everlasting kindness will I have mercy on thee, saith the LORD thy Redeemer.
9 For this is as the waters of Noah unto me: for as I have sworn that the waters of Noah should no more go over the earth; so have I sworn that I would not be wroth with thee, nor rebuke thee.
10 For the mountains shall depart, and the hills be removed; but my kindness shall not depart from thee, neither shall the covenant of my peace be removed, saith the LORD that hath mercy on thee.
11 O thou afflicted, tossed with tempest, and not comforted, behold, I will lay thy stones with fair colours, and lay thy foundations with sapphires.
12 And I will make thy windows of agates, and thy gates of carbuncles, and all thy borders of pleasant stones.
13 And all thy children shall be taught of the LORD; and great shall be the peace of thy children.
14 In righteousness shalt thou be established: thou shalt be far from oppression; for thou shalt not fear: and from terror; for it shall not come near thee.
15 Behold, they shall surely gather together, but not by me: whosoever shall gather together against thee shall fall for thy sake.
16 Behold, I have created the smith that bloweth the coals in the fire, and that bringeth forth an instrument for his work; and I have created the waster to destroy.
17 No weapon that is formed against thee shall prosper; and every tongue that shall rise against thee in judgment thou shalt condemn. This is the heritage of the servants of the LORD, and their righteousness is of me, saith the LORD.
Micah 4
1¶But in the last days it shall come to pass, that the mountain of the house of the LORD shall be established in the top of the mountains, and it shall be exalted above the hills; and people shall flow unto it.
2 And many nations shall come, and say, Come, and let us go up to the mountain of the LORD, and to the house of the God of Jacob; and he will teach us of his ways, and we will walk in his paths: for the law shall go forth of Zion, and the word of the LORD from Jerusalem.
3 And he shall judge among many people, and rebuke strong nations afar off; and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruninghooks: nation shall not lift up a sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more.
4 But they shall sit every man under his vine and under his fig tree; and none shall make them afraid: for the mouth of the LORD of hosts hath spoken it.
5 For all people will walk every one in the name of his god, and we will walk in the name of the LORD our God for ever and ever.
6 In that day, saith the LORD, will I assemble her that halteth, and I will gather her that is driven out, and her that I have afflicted;
7 And I will make her that halted a remnant, and her that was cast far off a strong nation: and the LORD shall reign over them in mount Zion from henceforth, even for ever.
And thou, O tower of the flock, the strong hold of the daughter of Zion, unto thee shall it come, even the first dominion; the kingdom shall come to the daughter of Jerusalem.
Totally missed it on Daniel's vision
Who country has Cross on their flag, and Lion of Judah? Finland. Country what have most blond and blue eyes people of The World. Where Blue eyes origin? Black sea area, somewhere Turkey, there where Eden is? Oca2 Gene, bluey eyes origin, who came about 6500 year ago, one ancestor all blue eyes people them. Adam?
All european royalty have a lion
On their emblem
We wuz.
Kangz
So we’re the Roman’s descendants of the Israelites or not?
The white ones yes. Same with the ancient Greeks
The roman's descended from Zarah, son of Judah. If i am correct, those Israelites seperated early on in history from the rest of the tribes of Israel around the time of the Egyptian slavery. Certainly they were from Judah and Dan. And they ended up in Greece and Italy.
We are descendants of the Romans that went with the Germanic people after they were sacked
@@laneyljk I could tell you why the KJV used the word black but your small monkey brain wouldn’t get it anyway.
@@laneyljk Neanderthals were dark skin.. same with homoerectus.