German Perspective: Battle of Monte Cassino '44

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 14 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 696

  • @vivaprez
    @vivaprez 3 роки тому +93

    my grandfather was killed just before here at sangro. he was 28th Māori bttn. new zealand infantry. the battalion went on to take heavy casualties at the train station below the monastry. i know people who lost grandfathers at this battle including my wife. it is very interesting & crucial historical information to hear a german perspective on this hard fought fight. thank u for excellent upload.

    • @ronchappel4812
      @ronchappel4812 3 роки тому +1

      When you Maori Bttn do you mean all -or perhaps most- were Maori?

    • @vivaprez
      @vivaprez 3 роки тому +10

      @@ronchappel4812 there may have been some other polynesians in there ron im not sure, but yep almost all Maori.

    • @ronchappel4812
      @ronchappel4812 3 роки тому +2

      @@vivaprez Thanks,thats interesting.

    • @FakingANerve
      @FakingANerve 2 роки тому +3

      Thanks for sharing his story. Cheers to your grandfather!

  • @loetzcollector466
    @loetzcollector466 3 роки тому +545

    A history Professor once told me "As historians, our first priority is to constantly remind ourselves that nothing which happened in the past was destined or preordained...except German counterattack."

    • @coachhannah2403
      @coachhannah2403 3 роки тому +44

      ...and Russians entrenching.

    • @withnail1967
      @withnail1967 3 роки тому +28

      A British WW1 version would be "Although the infantry attack was pushed forward with a great deal of pluck.."

    • @bruetel436
      @bruetel436 3 роки тому +13

      Did he mean Gegenstoß or Gegenangriff though?

    • @robertwoodroffe123
      @robertwoodroffe123 3 роки тому +3

      And yet they lost again!!

    • @robertwoodroffe123
      @robertwoodroffe123 3 роки тому +2

      @@bruetel436 the germs lost!

  • @typxxilps
    @typxxilps 3 роки тому +146

    my uncle later said that he was lucky at Monte Casino cause he became a british POW and was send to Canada and survived to come back and began his life as a farmer with a huge experience he had gained in Canada as a POW cause he was very young when he had been drafted. Just 20 years old when captivated with a journey through italy to el Alamein and back again to Italy and then to Canada or POW.
    He always talked about tough fighting even though he did not like to talk about that whole time.

    • @Sarahbryson321
      @Sarahbryson321 3 роки тому +1

      A… british pow? italian or wehrmacht

    • @martinmaier352
      @martinmaier352 3 роки тому +15

      @@Sarahbryson321 He was a POW after being caught by the Britains.

    • @Sarahbryson321
      @Sarahbryson321 3 роки тому +1

      @@martinmaier352 oh was he italian?

    • @martinmaier352
      @martinmaier352 3 роки тому +17

      @@Sarahbryson321 Why Italian? There is not one word about Italians. He fought as German Paratrooper and finally was POW in Canada.

    • @so8907
      @so8907 3 роки тому +1

      @@martinmaier352 not one word about german either.... it could have been Italian...

  • @dointh4198
    @dointh4198 3 роки тому +59

    I knew a Major of the 1st Fallschirmjäger-Div. at Monte Cassino. He told me, that they were much smaller in number than reported. ("You know, we fellows of the Luftwaffe did it on ourselves...") However he always pointed out that only the rubble, the mines and the Panzergrenadiers saved them. They were shattered to a Batallion in manpower.
    Yeah, Cassino - the GRIND.

  • @weirdslime262
    @weirdslime262 3 роки тому +80

    Several years ago when I was in college (high school), I went on a field trip to Wellington with my social studies class. During our lunch break my cohort decided to go to parliament on a whim. We randomly showed up, went through a metal detector, and then sat in the public gallery. Around the walls of parliament, there are plaques commemorating notable battles that New Zealand participated in. I distinctly remember having to explain to the girl next to me (who I had a crush on at the time, lol), about where and when Monte Cassino happened. Of the plaques we could see from our angle, she could recognise Gallipoli and Passchendaele among others, but had absolutely no knowledge of Monte Cassino. In general, the battle is very much a forgotten bit of NZ history that is seldom covered while we are at school.
    Thanks for the detailed breakdown of the battle, with accompanying birds-eye view diagrams of where and when the various events happened over the course of it. I'm growing more and more appreciative of this sort of visualisation style on youtube as it's much more effective at cementing how events actually took place compared to reading details over propaganda footage or still images.

    • @matthewrikihana6818
      @matthewrikihana6818 3 роки тому +11

      We Maori have not forgotten Cassino.

    • @aluckyshot
      @aluckyshot 3 роки тому

      Your country like my country fought the wrong enemy. Enjoy the NWO. Bet you didn't even get in that girls pants lol

  • @Akasazh
    @Akasazh 3 роки тому +103

    Having been to cassino, it baffles me how the allies could reach point 435. The map doesn't show the sheer steepness of those mountains. Yet somehow they reached there without using the roads, that where still under German control with point 236.
    I dare anyone to walk up the slope towards hangman's hill and then finding the energy to fight.

    • @thomaskositzki9424
      @thomaskositzki9424 3 роки тому +21

      Gurkhas... Simply the best fighting men of the entire British Empire.

    • @Rusty_Gold85
      @Rusty_Gold85 3 роки тому +1

      Thanks for the insight . I have never seen a good layout of the terrain and the struggle . the view point would confuse the uneducated when Tanks are involved in mountainous terrain

    • @33z6i6
      @33z6i6 3 роки тому +4

      They "slipped" through the German lines. When they realized that they couldn't hold the height any longer, they returned to where they have come from.

    • @mra5975
      @mra5975 2 роки тому +4

      @@thomaskositzki9424 they are certainly not the best of the corporation of londons empire, they are moderate, disciplined and simple. But they are not the best, even tho the corporation of london hates the historic British people and so always parades foreigners to somehow obscure there long standing and almost complete genocidal agenda against the Celtic Britons but it's those Celtic units that are the reason why this corporation gained a empire. Look up those units or check out Alan Wilson if your interested in real history.

    • @FakingANerve
      @FakingANerve 2 роки тому

      _Walk_ up? Why didn't you just use the elevator?

  • @Palora01
    @Palora01 3 роки тому +127

    I'm very happy to see other big channels pointing out that reports usually contained unrealistic or exaggerated claims as part of ass covering campaigns. Too many 'weekend historians' ignore that simple fact.

  • @caput_in_astris
    @caput_in_astris 3 роки тому +61

    3:37 first time I notice the Stormtrooper icon for shooting inaccuracy - just perfect 😀

    • @Incab
      @Incab 3 роки тому +2

      Beat me to the comment. Had me laughing out loud.

    • @jam8539
      @jam8539 3 роки тому +2

      love the little things, had a great laugh with high ping infantry as well

    • @peterschmidt1900
      @peterschmidt1900 3 роки тому

      Pretty sure this channel used it before.

  • @zombiehunter1977
    @zombiehunter1977 3 роки тому +95

    Fascinating. The guts of those men on both sides of the conflict, are incredibly humbling.

    • @zainmudassir2964
      @zainmudassir2964 3 роки тому

      Inside and outside too

    • @00yiggdrasill00
      @00yiggdrasill00 3 роки тому +2

      Regardless of why they fought or what they believed, the sheer courage required for this is hard to understand.

    • @cowgoesmoo3850
      @cowgoesmoo3850 3 роки тому +5

      All throughout the war to, they both had there badass troops/divisions. I bet alot of them became close after the war, the both lived the same scary life. R.I.P to everyone that died during WW2.

    • @31terikennedy
      @31terikennedy 3 роки тому

      The (guts) of the bad guy is a (Bad) thing.

    • @mariocalderon2148
      @mariocalderon2148 3 роки тому +3

      @@31terikennedy imagine you're a German boy of almost 18, say between 1939 and 1945, just before finishing your school. You get an invitation of your nearest district military office to be present at an exact hour an exact date for the physical examination.
      If you pass it, then a couple of weeks later, you get a notification to be present at the barrack (put a name here).
      Etc. etc. in the end, you are sent along with thousands of others on a train to Italy, Russia, Northern Africa, Norway etc.
      Does this make you a bad guy? I guess you would had behaved the same.
      Bad were the people who organized this, the ones who sent these innocent boys to be killed, who indoctrinated them, who permitted this to occur. Most soldiers on that war were victims also, who would much better have liked to amuse themselves than to kill and be killed.

  • @noetzol
    @noetzol 3 роки тому +92

    I was unaware that there were Panzer Grenadier units at Monte Cassino. Thank you for teaching me something that I didn’t know!

    • @rossorlandi5173
      @rossorlandi5173 3 роки тому +13

      Hi, I amfrom Monte Cassino, what a beautiful place to visit. The German paratroopers who fought there were some of the toughest in the Wehrmacht. And Polish army fought hard for every inch of that monastery.🇮🇹❤️.

  • @looinrims
    @looinrims 3 роки тому +201

    “24km away” *stormtrooper icon*

    • @88porpoise
      @88porpoise 3 роки тому +36

      To be fair, 24km is a lot for normal people, but that in aircraft cruising at 300 plus km/h likely coming from a location well over 500km away it isn't a huge degree of error.
      Travel just slightly off course and you see a town below you at about when you should see Cassino and the allied troops below you get busted.

    • @scrubsrc4084
      @scrubsrc4084 3 роки тому +8

      Given how much a high altitude bomber could miss by l... thats making the storm troopers envious

    • @smokerjim
      @smokerjim 3 роки тому +18

      "With the Norden bomb sight, it's possible for a bomber to hit a pickle barrel from an altitude of over 5 miles"
      "You bombed a town 15 miles away"
      "A town that I'm certain has pickle barrels, which I'm confident that at least one of which was hit by a bomb dropped from an altitude of at least 25,000 feet..."

    • @scrubsrc4084
      @scrubsrc4084 3 роки тому +7

      @@smokerjim the yanks could hit anything on the nose from 100 miles away..... as long as it was allied

    • @88porpoise
      @88porpoise 3 роки тому +6

      @@scrubsrc4084 and the Canadian and Polish troops managed to get bombed by RAF heavy bombers six days after the USAAF heavy bombers plastered them.
      I have read there were some mighty pissed off people after the second time they suffered hundreds of casualties from friendly bombers in the space of a week. It also didn't help the ensuing offer dives very much.

  • @k2xe455
    @k2xe455 3 роки тому +288

    you are sitting in the trench at Monte Cassino and you know you've taken a Pervitin tablet too much
    because you see in Poles line the cannon is loaded by a f*cking bear...

    • @Alobo075
      @Alobo075 3 роки тому +68

      All hail Wojtek!

    • @rosesprog1722
      @rosesprog1722 3 роки тому +12

      @Generic Cracker 2001 Too late Ludwig, we can't, the Brits and the Yanks have started taking it too. Too bad, invading France in 6 weeks was incredible, we were fighting day and night the poor French had no idea what had fallen upon their heads! Ya ya ya!

    • @typxxilps
      @typxxilps 3 роки тому +15

      They had no pervetin anymore that late in the war, at least not the regular army, maybe some fighters or night fighters and special forces. The common soldiers had to ask relative at home to buy and send some cause they did no longer get them also due to the negative impacts afterwards. The regulations for the medics had also changed to avoid all the negative implications, so the average soldier had to ask for. And there are proofs like the letter of a famous post war Nobell price winner who had asked his family for perventin.

    • @nonamesplease6288
      @nonamesplease6288 3 роки тому +11

      Es tut mir leid. No more Pervitin for you!
      One can only imagine what suffering through meth withdrawal in the field felt like. No wonder the Landser were begging the folks at home for it.

    • @rosesprog1722
      @rosesprog1722 3 роки тому +3

      @@nonamesplease6288 Oh, it was still available after the war and honestly it was probably a good thing considering how horrible life became for the population once the war had ended, I suppose it helped deal with reality, I guess. As for myself don't worry, I know someone who knows someone! He he.

  • @dandare2586
    @dandare2586 3 роки тому +47

    I spent a beautiful summers night in the monastery car park in my campervan 😀
    The strategic view from up there was amazing!!

  • @FirstNameLastName-tg3rc
    @FirstNameLastName-tg3rc 3 роки тому +46

    (3:33) Stormtroopers didn't have bad aim. They only couldn't aim when the plot needed them to not aim.

    • @danielbond9755
      @danielbond9755 3 роки тому +12

      Kind of like how a lightsaber can cut through anything except a central character (although forearms seem to be unusually weak).

    • @FirstNameLastName-tg3rc
      @FirstNameLastName-tg3rc 3 роки тому +4

      @@danielbond9755 With the exception of when the plot needs them to die, exactly like that.

    • @colbyburgesd9258
      @colbyburgesd9258 3 роки тому +8

      Stormtroopers actually have really good aim they can miss on purpose when required and make it look like they are trying to hit

    • @FirstNameLastName-tg3rc
      @FirstNameLastName-tg3rc 3 роки тому +3

      @@colbyburgesd9258 Good point.

    • @looinrims
      @looinrims 2 роки тому

      Hey in the original movie the orders were clear to threaten but not kill the good guys so they get tracked home
      Of course Disney didn’t help

  • @mechanicalturk5202
    @mechanicalturk5202 3 роки тому +35

    My great uncle lost his two brothers at Monte Cassino, He found out one of them was killed when he received a great coat and it had his brothers name on the collar. He went crazy and was sent back to New Zealand.

  • @nonamesplease6288
    @nonamesplease6288 3 роки тому +54

    3 tons of bombs for each Fallshirmjager .... plus artillery.
    That's the way to fight a war if you can afford it.

    • @thegreatkimber3777
      @thegreatkimber3777 3 роки тому +3

      If you don´t hit your target it´s just wasted resources.

    • @KaDaJxClonE
      @KaDaJxClonE 3 роки тому +12

      Welcome to the US where overkill comes standard.

    • @andrewmattox1233
      @andrewmattox1233 3 роки тому +12

      @@KaDaJxClonE the bombs should have a .50 Cal mounted on it.

    • @autolykos9822
      @autolykos9822 3 роки тому +5

      You also need to exploit it properly. Fire without maneuver is wasted ammo. Maneuver without fire is suicide.

    • @cs-rj8ru
      @cs-rj8ru 3 роки тому

      @@KaDaJxClonE Hardly. We haven't had overkill in 30 years.....

  • @charlieboffin2432
    @charlieboffin2432 3 роки тому +26

    Thank you for posting this and doing the work . It's always haunted me since I was a kid that so many of our New Zealand brothers died trying to take Cassino town and the monistary. I remember watching in the early 1980's the series the World at War which covered the battles in the episode " Tough old Gut " as it noted the New Zealand casualties as between 3,500 - 5,000 , whether this is accurate or not I don't know as you've mentioned them as 2,200.
    Thanks for putting this together.

  • @evilpixie96
    @evilpixie96 3 роки тому +174

    my mum's perspective, can you please fight somewhere else and don't forget to take your Nebelwerfer with you.
    they left the Nebelwerfer in my mum's farmyard, she dumped it in the river along with ammo, not bad for a 15 year old

    • @godweenausten
      @godweenausten 3 роки тому +21

      The nebelwerfer battery commander: understandable, have a nice day.

    • @robertwoodroffe123
      @robertwoodroffe123 3 роки тому

      Sorry hitler and Mussolini caused this !

    • @zainmudassir2964
      @zainmudassir2964 3 роки тому +2

      She was a brave woman

    • @void1968able
      @void1968able 3 роки тому +18

      A shame... I would like a Nebelwerfer in my farmyard resp. garden. *With* the ammo... not bad for a 52 year old.

    • @31terikennedy
      @31terikennedy 3 роки тому +3

      Considering that Nebelwerfer would have caused an overwhelming Allied response, good move!

  • @schwatzy6362
    @schwatzy6362 3 роки тому +48

    The husband of my mother's cousin was killed there. The German military had her husband's daily diary delivered to her about two months after the Monte Casino battle was over. He wrote saying, they had no one stationed in the Montesaery itself. But after the bombardment, he and a total of 150 soldiers moved into the ruins. I hadn't proofread my comment and now I organized it a bit.

  • @paulkelly2882
    @paulkelly2882 3 роки тому +56

    Always great to hear the perspective of the German soldier in battle

  • @hansmuster6004
    @hansmuster6004 3 роки тому +10

    In my training as artillery officer i was reminded time and again that one should not expect to be able to destroy infantry by massive heavy fire (artillery or by bombs). Heavy fire can immobilize the enemy for a certain time or interfere with his movements. As a rule a well led unit getting under heavy fire will dig in and almost always survive. This has been amply shown in the nightmare of trench warfare in WW1.
    Monte Cassino proved that this still was (and is) true... In the ensuing horrible infantry fighting the initial heavy fire allegedly 'killing the enemy' gave the attackers very little advantage. What ever advantage there was, likely became compensated by the massive changes in terrain by craters giving the disadvantage to attackers.

    • @paoloviti6156
      @paoloviti6156 3 роки тому +2

      You are correct stating this as 1st WW demonstrated this again and again like in Cassino making very difficult for the attackers to cross or climb waterlogged craters and whatever it can be added to make the life downright miserable for the attackers...

    • @paoloviti6156
      @paoloviti6156 3 роки тому

      @T[A]P Me!! To Have [S]EX With Me it was a 1st WW style of epic proportions resulting one of the most useless bombing of the Abbey of Monte Cassino that was nearly completely destroyed for no purpose, actually it helped the Germans to resist even more. More than 250,000 troops, 1,900 tanks and 4,000 airplanes tried to kick out roughly 150,000 German troops yet they failed with very high casualties: over 55,000 allies got killed versus around 20,000 Germans from 17 January - 18 May 1944. It was only because of the stupidity of generals like Alexander, Clarke and whoever that they wanted a "new Verdun" commanding far away refusing to understand the reality of the situation that resulted in such high losses forcing them to stay from 17 January - 18 May 1944 and it was considered a " victory" just because of the crack troops, the Fallschirmjäger, stayed put. Not happy General Clarke instead of obeying direct orders from General Alexander to cut the retreat of the German 10th Army in full retreat to Valmontone, but decided to rush to Rome permitting the Germans, more than 100,000 to escape permitting them retreat to form the Gothic line, resisting in Pisa and other places inflicting heavy casualties to the allies. Gosh what a victory the battle of Cassino....

  • @28pbtkh23
    @28pbtkh23 3 роки тому +5

    That was a very good video. In 26 minutes, you gave me a better picture of what happened than several documentaries that I have seen, each of which were an hour long. The maps were crucial for this understanding. Cheers.

  • @GenevaWhoppers
    @GenevaWhoppers 3 роки тому +3

    Best WWII channel on youtube. I love the vulgarisation still, you show a lot of commitments to details and show us the strategy and the tactic of an operation. Love it.

  • @benbregman7010
    @benbregman7010 3 роки тому +9

    MHV Bernard great job I leaned more from this video then all of the documentaries I have watched over the years on this battle. Please keep up the great work ! Long time patron

    • @mikepette4422
      @mikepette4422 3 роки тому +2

      my thoughts too. Some have mentioned the CBC documentaries but I found them very biased and highly inaccurate although Its been a while so maybe I should rewatch them .

    • @MilitaryHistoryVisualized
      @MilitaryHistoryVisualized  3 роки тому +1

      Thank you for your support!

    • @CarrotConsumer
      @CarrotConsumer 3 роки тому +1

      @@mikepette4422 Or read a book.

  • @MatsKratz
    @MatsKratz 3 роки тому +30

    Considering the video on Monte Cassino, have you ever thought on doing a video on the Brazilian Expeditionary Force (FEB, "Força Expedicionária Brasileira"), the Smoking Snakes, during the Italian Campaign?

    • @FirstNameLastName-tg3rc
      @FirstNameLastName-tg3rc 3 роки тому +8

      Just a warning, saying that may start inspiring Sabaton fans to start spamming song lyrics as replies to your comment.

    • @MatsKratz
      @MatsKratz 3 роки тому +3

      @@FirstNameLastName-tg3rc That's not an issue to me! lol

    • @FirstNameLastName-tg3rc
      @FirstNameLastName-tg3rc 3 роки тому +3

      @@MatsKratz If it helps, I was intending that to be a joke.

    • @MatsKratz
      @MatsKratz 3 роки тому +1

      @@FirstNameLastName-tg3rc I was too! If that happend i would laugh my ass off! Greetings from Brazil.

    • @dudumuricy9948
      @dudumuricy9948 3 роки тому

      And monte castelo would be a great video to

  • @whbrown1862
    @whbrown1862 3 роки тому +7

    Great episode! Interesting to see how the lack of proper reporting affecting both sides in terms of either denoting the strength of a defending division or masking of the true losses of the attacking force.

  • @adamjmorgan
    @adamjmorgan 3 роки тому +2

    "High ping was a problem" + the stormtrooper icon made me have a good chuckle when I needed it. I appreciate your sense of humor!

  • @richardcunningham5540
    @richardcunningham5540 3 роки тому +3

    This is a superb account of a brutal battle. Incredible insight from Dr Pahl and also Bernhard.

  • @smokejaguarsix7757
    @smokejaguarsix7757 3 роки тому +8

    I would really love for you to do a video on the German perspective of Riva Ridge, the Po Valley and the 10th Mountain Division. I served in the 10th in the late 90s and we worked hard to carry on its proud traditions and maintain its status as the toughest of the tough and most deployed Division among all the excellent Infantry Divisions of the U.S. Army. Climb to Glory!

    • @Deridus
      @Deridus 3 роки тому +1

      To the top.... (Get smoked, kitty. Sincerely, the Eridani Light Horse.)

    • @smokejaguarsix7757
      @smokejaguarsix7757 3 роки тому +1

      @@Deridus ELH got smoked on Strana Mechty. CSJ is back, reconstituted under the Republic as the Fidelis and going strong alongside the Ilclan, Wolf Empire.

    • @Deridus
      @Deridus 3 роки тому

      @@smokejaguarsix7757 "Reconstitured." Lol. It's what, one binary and some isorla? Besides, the ELH bought it on Herperus 2... To the Emerald Parakeet.

    • @smokejaguarsix7757
      @smokejaguarsix7757 3 роки тому +1

      @@killdizzle While Im not going to disparage fellow Americans, the Marines have older equipment, are unaccustomed to fighting without Naval support or behind enemy lines without a massive support system. I'd much rather fight them than the 18th Airborne Corps or any of the Divisions therein. They are trained to fight unsupported by other units, behind enemy lines for at minimum 3 days if necessary. They (we) have our own organic air, logistic and artillery support, our own transports (UH60s and CH47s) , can use enemy weapon systems, fight under any weather conditions and in any climate and can go to ground if necessary and start a guerilla campaign. We have our own ADA (Avengers and MANPAD Stingers), our own strike capability (AH64D) to knock out enemy C3, tactical and operational-level targets (which also has limited CAS via IR Sidewinders, SEAD and Anti-Tank capability via AGM-65E), along with plentiful MANPATGM Javelins for whatever other threat comes along. Give them Regular Army and USAF CAS and CAP support and we are virtually unbeatable. Again, not disparaging Marines, they have a specific mission and are quite good at it. But I think the 18th Airborne Corps are a more dangerous foe.

    • @smokejaguarsix7757
      @smokejaguarsix7757 3 роки тому +1

      @@Deridus There are 3 Fidelis Brigades any one of which is more powerful than a Galaxy. And now they are the Jaguars again. Meanwhile, the ELH is no more. They did buy it on Strana Mechty. Randill Bills revived them and then smashed them again. So....

  • @martinmaier352
    @martinmaier352 3 роки тому +26

    10:32 Confusing pronunciation: "three Sherman tanks" sounds rather like "three German tanks".

    • @adamcrookedsmile
      @adamcrookedsmile 3 роки тому +1

      it's not confusing though,in January 1944 German forces had few tanks left, only antitank guns, grenade launchers, infantry and horsedrawn carriages. German tank production was low compared to the Western Allies and the Soviet Union.

    • @RolloTonéBrownTown
      @RolloTonéBrownTown 3 роки тому

      @@adamcrookedsmile Not everyone here is a historian :)

    • @jimallen9859
      @jimallen9859 3 роки тому

      @@adamcrookedsmile
      Most would've been sent to the Russian Front. German's loved T-34, God know's they captured enough of them.
      You might be surprised at German production number's throughout the war.
      Much higher than one would expect from a country and population that size.
      When Rommel ran out of panzers, he used captured armor. As did the other panzer divisions. Germans would go out at night, drag the knocked out tanks back to their repair facilities, and rebuild them overnight theirs, and the enemy tanks they dragged back. Today Russian's find T-34 with German markings. The German's didn't remove the Russian markings, just added theirs.

  • @raysubsonic
    @raysubsonic 3 роки тому +4

    Great video Bernard. This battle and campaign tends to be misrepresented on the Western/allied side of history. Australian, Maori & Kiwi, Canadian, Brazilian, Polish, British and US divisions were all involved in the campaign. Kesselring definitely outfoxed a number of the Allied generals.

  • @TheDgamesD
    @TheDgamesD 3 роки тому +6

    Interesting note: the Italian 1st motorized group was present at the fighting on the allied side: (67th Infantry Regiment, 51st Bersaglieri Battalion, 11th Artillery Regiment, 5th Anti-Tank Regiment, along with a engineer battalion.)

    • @TheDgamesD
      @TheDgamesD 3 роки тому +1

      @ Actually they were near the spearhead and helped breakthrough the western sides defenses playing a critical role in the attack.

    • @TheDgamesD
      @TheDgamesD 3 роки тому

      @ Actually all of the German Army at El Alamein during the retreat would have been overrun if the Italian General located there made the split second decision to make a delaying action. Fighting to the last to buy Rommel the time he needed to retreat.

  • @TechToWatch
    @TechToWatch Місяць тому +1

    I visited the military museum in Dresden the December before covid. It was really excellent, with military stuff but also some contemporary civilian stuff to show context of the society that the military was part of. I went back every day for 4 days as I looked at and read everything, using Wikipedia as a companion for further details

  • @dayros2023
    @dayros2023 3 роки тому +12

    I visited the abbey of Montecassino 2 years ago. Wonderful place, and such a commanding position on the area. The bombing of the abbey, one of the most important of Europe, was truly a crime against humanity, but thankfully it has been rebuilt exactly as it was. From the top you can also see the war cemeteries, especially the polish one.

    • @Dilley_G45
      @Dilley_G45 3 роки тому +4

      It's not just the buildings of the monastery. It's thousands of irreplaceable ancient manuscripts

    • @footballnick2
      @footballnick2 3 роки тому +3

      A completely unnecessary destruction at that.

  • @mchrome3366
    @mchrome3366 3 роки тому

    You can never get too specific for me. I love each and every fact. Thank you.

  • @elwray3506
    @elwray3506 3 роки тому +1

    Katriel Ben Arie, "Die Schlacht bei Monte Cassino 1944": "Die Verluste des Neuseeländischen Korps in den Kämpfen um Cassino waren sehr schwer. Auf die Frage von Churchill nannte Wilson die Zahl von insgesamt 2400 Mann: 1050 Mann der neuseeländischen 2. Division, 1160 Mann der indischen 4. Division (401 Briten und 759 Inder) und 190 Mann der 78. Division. In der amtl. Darstellung des neuseeländischen Heeres wird jedoch die Zahl der Verluste allein für die Zeit vom 15. bis 26. März 1944, d.h. von Beginn der zweiten Schlacht bis zur Auflösung des neuseeländischen Korps, mit 140 Offizieren und 1966 Mann angegeben."

  • @CivilWarWeekByWeek
    @CivilWarWeekByWeek 3 роки тому +12

    Can’t wait for more perspective videos

    • @laurisikio
      @laurisikio 3 роки тому +1

      Well, the whole channel is about ww2 from German perspective.

  • @thinman8621
    @thinman8621 3 роки тому +5

    That close air support dropped bombs within 20 kilometers of the target.

  • @antiquatedideas1107
    @antiquatedideas1107 3 роки тому +1

    Damn... I'd love to see a movie or series detailing the battle of the monestary. Imagine the POV of a company of soldiers like Band of Brothers, who are tasked with defending one of the bunkers, must retreat the monestary, and then hear about or have friends who take part in the total failure to retake the station. What a power piece that could be. It shows the resolve of the germans, how ideology plays a role, the despair and hopeless, the idiocy of command, and so many more emotions just on the German side. Plus it gives a unique perspective on the dedication and relentlessness of the allies who threw everything they had at this, and often had very elite and motivated soldiers

  • @haroldgodwinson832
    @haroldgodwinson832 3 роки тому +2

    Back in the early 1980s when I was finishing my university studies I was employed at a grain storage facility during my holidays. While working there I came across an old guy who had fought in the NZ Division at Cassino. Although he had fought through the North African Campaign beforehand, he said the fighting at Cassino was horrific by comparison.

  • @paladinbob1236
    @paladinbob1236 3 роки тому +12

    still annoyed about general clark who instead of flanking the german lines to trap german units [which is why some of these battles around cassino are taking place and the sacrifice of the allied troops keeping the germans in play] , instead raced for Rome , taking his glory and place in history...but allowing all those german units who could have been flanked and trapped and cutoff to withdraw without issue to a new defensive line [sighs] :(

    • @mikepette4422
      @mikepette4422 3 роки тому +2

      Yeah there was a reason why Clarke was considered among the very "BEST" allied generals wasn't he ? 😜

    • @paladinbob1236
      @paladinbob1236 3 роки тому +4

      @@mikepette4422 well he sure didnt show it in italy, thats for sure :(

    • @lovablesnowman
      @lovablesnowman 3 роки тому

      It's actually unlikely that the US troops could have actually cut off the Germans retreat. They just didn't have the strength or logistics to do so

    • @paladinbob1236
      @paladinbob1236 3 роки тому +5

      @@lovablesnowman of course there was opportunity..you dont have to appear so weak as to shore up a american general who preferred his own glory as opposed to the plan that cost a massive amount of lives to implement :( do ithink perhaps it would have netted as much germans as they theorised? no..i dont..but lets face it, he deviated from the general agreed plan for his own glory at the cost of his and his allies men..that is poor generalship&looking out for his own personal career :(

    • @lovablesnowman
      @lovablesnowman 3 роки тому

      @@paladinbob1236 no he deviated because he didn't have the strength or logistics to cut off the Germans. It's not like HOI4 where you can just cut off and encircle armies

  • @fattyMcGee97
    @fattyMcGee97 3 роки тому +17

    It always messes with my perspective of these things when you hear about a ceasefire and the soldiers on both sides are being friendly to each other, even sharing stretchers.
    I wonder how this made some of these men feel when they opened fire on each other again? After all; the cease fire was only temporary.

    • @paolocalzolari9977
      @paolocalzolari9977 3 роки тому +5

      I guess business as usual.

    • @jam8539
      @jam8539 3 роки тому +3

      even more bizzar when he notes that neither side was taking prisoners

  • @spoddie
    @spoddie 3 роки тому +11

    Thank you.
    Of all the History Channel style documentaries I've seen, I have never heard about NZ in Italy. I'm Australian and it's appalling how the Commonwealth gets written out of history.

    • @dovetonsturdee7033
      @dovetonsturdee7033 3 роки тому +5

      You should read books rather than rely on TV documentaries. The role of New Zealand (and Canadian, Indian, & South African troops, among others) is fully documented, and has been for years.

    • @spoddie
      @spoddie 3 роки тому

      @@dovetonsturdee7033 I didn't say that I didn't know about it.

    • @28pbtkh23
      @28pbtkh23 3 роки тому

      Tell me about it. Today I heard an American history professor say on a WW2 documentary that “the Americans managed to convince the Nazis that the Normandy landings were a side-show and that the main landings would be coming later in the Pas de Calais area.”
      The work he was referring to was a completely British operation. What a berk.
      But you’re right: TV documentaries often use the word ‘British’ when they really mean Aussies, Kiwis, Canadians or even Indians.

    • @ijh867zter6
      @ijh867zter6 3 роки тому

      Because it's irrelevant who was there in the greater picture outside of the main actors. If NZ hadn't been there it would have been another British client. It changes nothing, it was just additional manpower. They did what they were told.

  • @advorak8529
    @advorak8529 3 роки тому +6

    "Shift + S; Space"
    Gotta love it! *heart*

  • @blizardbear
    @blizardbear 3 роки тому +5

    Thank you for covering this as it is a big deal in the NZDF history.

  • @adoramus
    @adoramus 6 місяців тому

    Great thanks. This battle is extremely important to the Polish, as our 2nd Corps in the West fought in this battle and was the Allied unit, who first entered the terrain of the shattered Monte Cassino monastery. Thank for showing the courage and firmness of German soldiers. Despite horrible Nazi Germany attrocities in 2nd World War I still hope that this battle could remind us both of the need to build a better future for our 2 nations in Europe.

  • @astraysheep
    @astraysheep 3 роки тому +6

    If you want copies of the NZ war diaries for future videos I'm a local historian living just down the road from Archives NZ, happy to help

    • @MilitaryHistoryVisualized
      @MilitaryHistoryVisualized  3 роки тому

      thank you! Do you know if there is a pdf version of the official New Zealand History? Because I prefer a scanned version of the original over the currently available html version, but couldn't find anything.

    • @astraysheep
      @astraysheep 3 роки тому +1

      @@MilitaryHistoryVisualized Sorry, as far as I know the only digital version is the NZETC one you've already seen ...

  • @ErokLobotomist
    @ErokLobotomist 3 роки тому

    This was the first WW2 battle I ever read about in depth. Great video, tons of info I never knew, especially the bombs per paratrooper ratio.

  • @shanemcdowall
    @shanemcdowall 3 роки тому +10

    Freyberg asked for three strikes by a dozen " kitty bombers" ( P-40s) using single 1000 pound bombs. The US Army Air Force sent 142 B-17s, 47 B-25s and 40 Martin Marauders. Typical American overkill.

    • @newtype0083
      @newtype0083 3 роки тому +1

      If it's worth doing, it's worth overdoing.

    • @shanemcdowall
      @shanemcdowall 3 роки тому +1

      @@cdgncgn More likely US air power enthusiasts decided this was a good way to demonstrate what bombers could do to support the army.

    • @hurdygurdyman1905
      @hurdygurdyman1905 3 роки тому +1

      @@cdgncgn stupid comment

  • @cliffordterry2133
    @cliffordterry2133 3 роки тому +1

    I really enjoyed this presentation the style of which I had never before seen.

    • @MilitaryHistoryVisualized
      @MilitaryHistoryVisualized  3 роки тому

      Glad you enjoyed it!

    • @cliffordterry2133
      @cliffordterry2133 3 роки тому +1

      @@MilitaryHistoryVisualized Oh, so very much so. I do enjoy your videos in general but I think this video probably was the hardest video to put together. While I have seen other excellent videos on the subject and some included information that yours did not. Yet, your approach required just a little more effort and I do not doubt that it is among the best, if not the best, video I have seen on the subject.

  • @Dr.Reszegi_Zsolt
    @Dr.Reszegi_Zsolt 3 роки тому +1

    Interesting and spectacular video. At 13:28 a whole Battalion of Fallschirmjäger surrendered. Source? Primary (Bundesarchiv - Militärarchiv), secondary (recollection), or something else?
    Just curious, because for example Hans-Martin Stimpel didn't mention it in his book.

  • @spot1401
    @spot1401 3 роки тому +46

    Maoris and Ghurkas vs. Fallschirmjägers. What is this, totally accurate battle simulator? New map 'fish market'? :)

    • @warbrain1053
      @warbrain1053 3 роки тому +14

      Also polish

    • @Dilley_G45
      @Dilley_G45 3 роки тому +1

      Maori and fish....Combat power to get some paua

  • @somethingelse4878
    @somethingelse4878 3 роки тому +6

    My sisters father in-law was there, what he told me would never be put in the history books
    He was Irish living in England

    • @cs-rj8ru
      @cs-rj8ru 3 роки тому +1

      Must be North Irish....What self respecting Tater Catholic Irish would be caught living in England at that time?

    • @dovetonsturdee7033
      @dovetonsturdee7033 3 роки тому +4

      @@cs-rj8ru Quite a lot. A large number of men from the Republic also joined the British armed forces during WW2, and were persecuted by the Government of the Republic for many years after 1945.

    • @shastealyomeal
      @shastealyomeal 3 роки тому

      What did he say

  • @cryhavoc999
    @cryhavoc999 3 роки тому +1

    I used to work with a chap who was an Engineer / co-pilot on Lancaster's during WW2. When I suggested he must have had a rough time I was surprised when he claimed the opposite in that as his aircraft was never caught in search lights or attacked by night fighters he thinks he had an easy time of it and added 'My brother was in the Army at Monte Cassino and had a terrible time'.

  • @RodrigoFernandez-td9uk
    @RodrigoFernandez-td9uk 3 роки тому +6

    Why now, Bernhard? I have two tons of work to finish yesterday!

  • @cannonfodder4376
    @cannonfodder4376 3 роки тому +1

    Yet another informative video, I must admit that I never gave thought to the Panzergrenadier units that fought there. Never knew about the Fallschirmjager dishonesty with paperwork as well.

  • @kennethrosequist8963
    @kennethrosequist8963 3 роки тому

    Great work, really enjoyed this one!

  • @edopronk1303
    @edopronk1303 3 роки тому +2

    Great video.
    Could you somehow create in the map a clear direction from which the opposite sides attack?
    Although the left bottom corner had all the German strong points, I thought these were forward positions and the German line was North from these strong points.
    This was because I thought the Allies would attack from the south. But after you've drawn the new Allied line, I first understood that the Allies were already east and north of Monte Casino and somehow attacked to the southwest?
    I was very confused for a while.

  • @Marcinos1985
    @Marcinos1985 3 роки тому +1

    Crazy good quality

  • @23319461
    @23319461 3 роки тому +2

    my father was at monte cassino .he was a lieutenant commanding a 25 pounder field gun in the new zealand army.I can only say he and those with him were very fortunate not to be in the front line .the tenacity of both the allies and the germans.can only be admired .I remember my dad saying to me that he held the german fighters in high regard.The one other thing i remember him saying was he hated the german 88

    • @shastealyomeal
      @shastealyomeal 3 роки тому

      The Stuka or the flak cannon?

    • @23319461
      @23319461 2 роки тому +1

      flak cannon@@shastealyomeal

  • @mikeyoung7660
    @mikeyoung7660 3 роки тому +1

    Great video thank you 👍👍👍

  • @jamesbryson575
    @jamesbryson575 3 роки тому

    The view from the (rebuilt) monastery gives you reason to admire all who fought there.

  • @zainmudassir2964
    @zainmudassir2964 3 роки тому +2

    Hope you do Anzio next!

  • @DriveByBacon
    @DriveByBacon 3 роки тому +1

    Great video, very interesting to learn about the presence of panzer grenadiers at Monte Casino! Will you be making a video about the 3rd/4th battle which resulted in the capture of the Cathedral and the whole of the town?

    • @MilitaryHistoryVisualized
      @MilitaryHistoryVisualized  3 роки тому +2

      thank you; unlikely, I was not happy making this video and currently it is doing extremely poorly as well.

    • @DriveByBacon
      @DriveByBacon 3 роки тому +2

      @@MilitaryHistoryVisualized ah that is a shame!

  • @Kethploy
    @Kethploy 3 роки тому +7

    Warm-up for COH 3

  • @Martinlegend
    @Martinlegend 3 роки тому +31

    so the Fallschirmjäger are so tough that they count two battles as one :O

    • @robertwoodroffe123
      @robertwoodroffe123 3 роки тому +1

      Didn’t get my dad took out 3 high rank officers later as head sniper of nz div , ultra decrypts ! Not orders

    • @robertwoodroffe123
      @robertwoodroffe123 3 роки тому

      Who invented computers ? The most dangerous weapon invented ! Not Germans

    • @kallemickelborg
      @kallemickelborg 3 роки тому +2

      @@robertwoodroffe123 "The German civil engineer Konrad Zuse (1910-1995) is considered the inventor of the first digital and programmable computers - a feat he first accomplished in 1938, long before anyone else."
      get rektum

    • @robertwoodroffe123
      @robertwoodroffe123 3 роки тому

      @@kallemickelborg did he produce any thing useful?

    • @robertwoodroffe123
      @robertwoodroffe123 3 роки тому

      @@kallemickelborg my dad took out your side !

  • @paladinbob1236
    @paladinbob1236 3 роки тому +1

    a informed and must see for military history enthusiasts on this famous battle from the german perspective :)

  • @robertmiller2173
    @robertmiller2173 2 роки тому

    My father fought in this battle he was a Tank Commander with the 20th Armoured Regiment of the New Zealand Army. My mum and dad caught up with the veterans of the Fallschirmjager in Munich in the 1980's my dad had fought the Fallschirmjager in Crete so they had a lot to talk about. In Crete he (My dad) was wounded crossing Melene Airport with two Fallschirmjager prisoners. My dad's Sherman Mk 4 tank was knocked out probably by a Stug, but nobody got injured except for their eardrums and nerves. It was a highlight of my parents trip to Europe; catching up with their old foe. they all had a great night! Charlie Upham was also at this reunion; Charlie Upham was the most highly decorated person in the entire British Empire and a Veteran of the famous 20th Battalion as was my father. The 20th Battalion was a South Island Battalion! My father Rex Miller was awarded an oak Leaf and Bar!

  • @looinrims
    @looinrims 3 роки тому +20

    “Losses *before* the battle?!”
    Rainbow dash token
    I agree

  • @toddmoss1689
    @toddmoss1689 3 роки тому

    I visited Cassino and Monte Cassino back in 2004 where I paid my respects at the German and Commonwealth cemeteries. You really can’t appreciate the mountainous terrain without seeing it firsthand.

  • @demonprinces17
    @demonprinces17 3 роки тому +30

    Not enough soldiers died so their leadership decided they didn't attack hard enough, sounds like poor leadership which I understand that the Italian front had poor leadership

    • @princeofcupspoc9073
      @princeofcupspoc9073 3 роки тому +7

      He's called Mark Clark. One of the true villains of the story. Alexander should have had him shot for incompetence.

    • @robertwoodroffe123
      @robertwoodroffe123 3 роки тому +1

      @@princeofcupspoc9073 . Mr showboat gen Mark Clarke . My father pissed at him so many more lives lost after he had to enter Rome ! Instead of mopping up the germs

    • @robertwoodroffe123
      @robertwoodroffe123 3 роки тому

      @@princeofcupspoc9073 one of my uncle on mother’s side two weeks after his 21st birthday

    • @82dorrin
      @82dorrin 3 роки тому +1

      @@princeofcupspoc9073 If Clark hadn't detoured to Rome against his orders, Monte Cassino might not have ever happened.

  • @EntryLevelLuxury
    @EntryLevelLuxury 3 роки тому

    I.. was expecting footage. Well done regardless.

  • @chrisnewport7826
    @chrisnewport7826 3 роки тому

    My Father was there, on the left. An Engineer Officer. While building a bridge, away from the others and his rifle he was surprised by a Fallschirmjäger with an MP 40 at the ready who suddenly appeared from the brush. They looked at each other for a moment then the German back away as he came, deciding not to kill that day. My Father learned two important lessons that day very inexpensively.

  • @billbolton
    @billbolton 3 роки тому +3

    Thanks. Makes me wonder if instead of high explosives fuel was dropped and ignited the subsequent heat and lack of oxygen would be more effective on the troops in deep bunkers. Fire has a particularly demoralizing effect.

    • @typxxilps
      @typxxilps 3 роки тому +2

      Does not work at all on top of a mountain or ridge. It only works in urban areas that way especially in the dehousing worker air raid campaign where the civilians died in their cellars not getting enough oxygen anymore. They had not many bunkers, just natural shelters and partly the natural cellar and underground of the Monastire, My uncle had fought there and went into canadian POW. They had been partly evacuated during the bombarding but they were using mostly natural caves or existing cellars. In those cave they sadly lost all the vine of the monestary and thought that they should had drunken that earlier instead of watching the wine running out of the barrels and the broken bottles.

    • @billbolton
      @billbolton 3 роки тому

      @@typxxilps thanks. Newsreel footage ua-cam.com/video/u8afP6GetP8/v-deo.html

  • @russwoodward8251
    @russwoodward8251 2 роки тому

    Very good. Thanks.

  • @pjnealon3476
    @pjnealon3476 3 роки тому

    Excellent video. Thanks

  • @tomaltomal2702
    @tomaltomal2702 3 роки тому +1

    Very interesting video.

  • @lordDenis16
    @lordDenis16 3 роки тому +4

    Owwww I was hoping that you'd mention the 4th battle ;/ Great video never the less!

  • @PolyDave
    @PolyDave 3 роки тому +2

    My Uncle (22) fought at Cassino, with the Armour of the 2ndNZEF. He survived, but it didn't do him much good. The Italian campaign was a long drawn out and brutal affair. Besides the fighting there were freezing temperatures, sicknesses to contend with. The allied leadership wasn't great either.

  • @c32amgftw
    @c32amgftw 3 роки тому

    Would be awesome if you could include news reels from the time of this battle. Excellent and interesting video nevertheless!

  • @robertwoodroffe123
    @robertwoodroffe123 3 роки тому

    Man the info u had ! Top marks

  • @robertwoodroffe123
    @robertwoodroffe123 3 роки тому

    Fairly well done !!

  • @superspectator123
    @superspectator123 3 роки тому

    Good video. Thank you.

  • @davidbrennan660
    @davidbrennan660 3 роки тому +2

    My Grandfather was there 5th Inf Div 5th Rece corp. hard fighting.

  • @RayTracingRevolution
    @RayTracingRevolution 3 роки тому +3

    Ist x Stiehlhandgranaten pro Quadratmeter das Badewannen/Fußballfelder-Äquivalent? :p

  • @angusmcgregor7598
    @angusmcgregor7598 3 роки тому

    It is interesting to get a German perspective. The New Zealand battalion histories note that the weather and high state of the Rapido river had impacts on supplying allied troops on the north bank of the river and resulted in boggy ground conditions. Extensive mine laying on the sides of the road to Casino also limited the advance to the town.
    There was a fair bit Of history between the falshirmjagers and the Kiwis dating back to North Africa, a respect for each other’s toughness and not much compassion.
    The fact that so many of the allied movements over the river were observed by German forces was noted as a major hinderance to manoeuvre.

  • @davidburroughs2244
    @davidburroughs2244 3 роки тому +1

    I knew it was tough. I had no idea why it was so difficult. When one actually sees the mountainous terrain then one gains a greater appreciation of why it was important and why it was so difficult to hold and equally difficult to take.

    • @robertwoodroffe123
      @robertwoodroffe123 3 роки тому +1

      My old man lost something like a stone? in about 4 or 5 days on point 202 ides of March to ? Allowed to pass back through German lines ! As wounded! , his right hand saved his face and eye sight!!

    • @robertwoodroffe123
      @robertwoodroffe123 3 роки тому

      I mean when the mortar bomb hit his Sangie ? ( not sure the spell? Indian word ? ) beside his right leg , in the darkness! As above plus the 1927 Thompson he had had since the last guy couldn’t use it! Or anything else ever again! Kiwi frozen brains! Took ages to remove from it! Then as above mortar hit ended up this shape “U “!

    • @robertwoodroffe123
      @robertwoodroffe123 3 роки тому

      Then there’s the bad stuff

    • @robertwoodroffe123
      @robertwoodroffe123 3 роки тому

      Only time he use Bren ! Didn’t like it ! So accurate! . Think he pulverise !? Mag in the sight line!? As said the bad !

    • @robertwoodroffe123
      @robertwoodroffe123 3 роки тому

      Who wants to blender?

  • @WitchhunteR82
    @WitchhunteR82 2 місяці тому

    According to "Battlefield 1942 Road to Rome" game, Germany, beside few PAK40 anti tank guns, also had 1 StuGIII (Usually i was waiting in Monastery until it respawn)

  • @roberthopwood3758
    @roberthopwood3758 3 роки тому +15

    For those using imperial units:
    4000 metric tons = 1 metric sh*t ton.

  • @freetolook3727
    @freetolook3727 3 роки тому +2

    And, the only reason that the Allies eventually took the area, is because the German forces retrated out of the area because of pressure on other places and the Germans did not want to be surrounded.

    • @pd4165
      @pd4165 3 роки тому +1

      History does not happen in a vacuum.
      The Gustav/Winter line collapsed under pressure at many points - but the pivotal one is usually considered to be Monte Cassino.
      Not wanting to be surrounded = defeated, so left - your version has overtones of THEY WERE SUPERMEN, MIGHTY WARRIORS THAT WERE UNDEFEATED.
      The reality is they were defeated - if they stayed longer they would have been captured or killed.
      It wasn't a boxing match (all settled in a certain place/time) - it was a World War. If circumstances were different (eg no invasion of Russia) then there would have been more men and supplies and the outcome different.
      But it wasn't.
      The Allies advanced on Monte Cassino. The Allies captured Monte Cassino. It was not a gift from your supermen (that suddenly decided they didn't like what was going on, so ran away).

    • @freetolook3727
      @freetolook3727 3 роки тому +1

      Nope, not at all.
      The German army in Italy was well equipped and very experienced. They were also in a highly defensible position all along the line with well entrench positions with overlapping fields of fire.
      Not taking away anything from either side.
      Just the fact that the allies tried many different tactics and lost a lot of men and in the end they took those positions because the the German army was forced to withdraw.
      I play board games also. At least in the games to overcome an entrenched enemy in a defensive position, you have to have at least a six-to-one advantage in numbers otherwise you will fail in the attack.

  • @lukeeszeha5381
    @lukeeszeha5381 3 роки тому

    so while we are talking about italy in WW2, could you make a video about Sardinia and Corsica in 1943?
    I found virtually nothing about that topic, despite putting quite some effort into it ^^

  • @robertcolajezzi5273
    @robertcolajezzi5273 3 роки тому

    Could you do a video on when yakovlev visited germany along with details of a trade agreement that included naval and air force equipment i believe

  • @geoffbarney5914
    @geoffbarney5914 3 роки тому +5

    26:10 true, although the attack on Monte Cassino itself by the poles basically did fail, it was only when outflanked were the paratroops pulled back…speaking of which, why on earth didn’t Freyburg try to outflank them in March?

    • @PalleRasmussen
      @PalleRasmussen 3 роки тому +3

      Because he was a bumpling idiot with a Great War perspective on tactics. I can think of no success of his during WW2

    • @luisnunes2010
      @luisnunes2010 3 роки тому +3

      We're talking Freyburg here, a general who's head was bone all the way through!

    • @kingrichard728
      @kingrichard728 3 роки тому +1

      @@PalleRasmussen You could try looking at the battle of Mareth. When you look at Freyberg's actions that aren't Crete and Cassino he comes across as a lot more able and innovative.

    • @kingrichard728
      @kingrichard728 3 роки тому

      @@luisnunes2010 What are you basing this on?

    • @kingrichard728
      @kingrichard728 3 роки тому +3

      Freyberg did attempt to outflank them. This was the task given to the Indian division. The reason Monte Cassino Fell was because the attack was scaled up by an order of magnitude. Instead of attacking with a Corp of two divisions and a week to prepare, the fourth attack was made by something like thirteen divisions that had about a month to prepare. I think this fact is often lost on Freyberg detractors. If a task ended up requiring multiple corps to achieve then can you really expect an under-strength corps to be able to achieve the same?

  • @tedtimmis8135
    @tedtimmis8135 3 роки тому +1

    Just goes to show that the quality of the fighting man makes a big difference.

  • @tasjan9190
    @tasjan9190 Рік тому

    Does anyone have information on the Stug crew that operated the Stug III that was utilized in the ruins popping in and out of cover raining precise cannon fire on the Allies attempting to push up the summit?

  • @1337fraggzb00N
    @1337fraggzb00N 3 роки тому

    03:34 I like the icon of the Stormtrooper who mostly misses the target 💪😅

  • @neilwilson5785
    @neilwilson5785 3 роки тому

    Another classic. I learned some new stuff today.

    • @ava5246
      @ava5246 3 роки тому

      A history Professor once told me "As historians, our first priority is to constantly remind ourselves that nothing which happened in the past was destined or preordained...except German counterattack."

  • @schwatzy6362
    @schwatzy6362 3 роки тому +2

    There is no way that the Fallschimjager Division had 13,000 fighting soldiers. Perhaps in total with support personnel in\cluding pilots and aircraft people. The Fallschimjager I believe had a different way of reporting their action. Only the ones that were actually dropped and fighting were in the numbers. But this didn't involve a drop. So perhaps support personnel were close by. A lack of clarity by Fallschimjager. But the diary of cousin's husband said only about 1,000 fallschimjager were involved at Monte Cassino because of a severe mauling in earlier battles and Hitler didn't like airdrops and he didn't allow more replacements. HQ may have been going by "whats on paper"

    • @typxxilps
      @typxxilps 3 роки тому +1

      If the german command asked to check the figures and why those have been so low then I guess the diaries of those units do not lie. Who did really know the whole amount of soldiers while fighting there ?
      Just a few officers and the radio man but that was it. Go and visit the german archives and I guess you will find a full report of the strength of the Fallschirmjäger Division that for sure will explain the 13.000 men fighting there as a whole, not saying how many had been in particular on top of the monastir.
      BTW: that is a member of an official german museum or better german agency so he will have the proofs for that. You might try to get a book and there you will find the sources. Just a matter of time till allied historians will start to digg into the sources to rewrite history about the real strength which would look a lot better than the fight against just 3.500 men.
      In 10 years we might see the New Citino book about Monte Casino and all the others that covered those battles. Just a matter of time.

    • @mikepette4422
      @mikepette4422 3 роки тому

      seems hard to believe right ?

    • @Gabrieljoseph129
      @Gabrieljoseph129 3 роки тому +2

      My boss's father was a 18 year old paratrooper at Monte Casino and was captured. After the war he came to Australia and was still alive in 2019 when my boss retired. He said there was only a couple of thousand at Monte casino but the terrain was the reason they were able to hold out with the numbers they had.

    • @schwatzy6362
      @schwatzy6362 3 роки тому +1

      @@typxxilps I don't need to do that. I know the information they gave is incorrect. German HQ often inflated numbers to satisfy Hitler and keep themselves free from his wrath. The Monastery ruins had only 150. it was never captured by the Allies. Only after the Fallschimjagers pulled out did they take it over. Done. The amount of Fallschimjager in my estimation was 2,000 and maybe if stretched, 3,000. Hitler and Himmler kept that division from being topped up. no need to reply as I won't budge in my opinion. I'm a stubborn one of Prussian heritage. LOL!

    • @DeltaEchoGolf
      @DeltaEchoGolf 3 роки тому

      You are right that FJ units had fairly large support units. Being basically light infantry. But what is not often mentioned is how mechanized many FJ units became. Being issued armored cars and STUGs.

  • @samstewart4807
    @samstewart4807 3 роки тому

    An excellent video. Drach did a video on operation excess, They have almost no info from the German side- Who commanded the german forces ??? Who was responsible for their excellent tactics? Did the germans share any of this info with the Japanese? I hope you will look at that battle- sam

  • @MrAli171
    @MrAli171 3 роки тому +3

    So many brave men on both sides lost there lives at Cassino