John David Ebert @ Lafayette, "Oswald Spengler and the Cycles of History" (full event)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 8 вер 2024
  • Cultural critic John David Ebert visited Lafayette on Sept. 10, 2020 to deliver a talk entitled, "Oswald Spengler and the Cycles of History." A Q&A session follows his presentation.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 131

  • @wroughtiron7258
    @wroughtiron7258 2 роки тому +37

    "I'm not interested in convincing anyone that they're wrong."
    Absolutely based.

    • @josephmelton4721
      @josephmelton4721 Рік тому

      Not based at all haha. Complete opposite. Society is shit with no standard

    • @wroughtiron7258
      @wroughtiron7258 Рік тому +14

      @@josephmelton4721 You don't understand the perspective. There are three types of people in the world: the people who won the culture war decades ago and are still fighting it, the doofuses who lost the culture war decades ago and are still fighting it, and the people who know this civilization has already reached its end and we're just watiing for the shooting to start. There is no point arguing with people anymore. Just make your point and walk away, the precious few who are capable of understanding will get it instantly without the drama of 'arguments.'

    • @josephmelton4721
      @josephmelton4721 Рік тому

      @@wroughtiron7258 you sound like you don’t have kids and you think civilizations are easy to read maps for kids and you’re dead wrong. You think you’re some how enlightened because you listened to some guy who read Spangler and you’re laughing at all the people arguing because you know the cutlture is already dead? You sound like an unemployed kid with too much time on your hands. Human will determination decides civilizations. Not loners like Spengler. The future isn’t set. You’re what we call a indeterminate pessimist. You think it’s getting worse but you don’t exactly know why. You think it’s going to get worse so you have no energy to do anything. You’re CHOOSING that.

    • @jasonmoss-qk8oh
      @jasonmoss-qk8oh Рік тому

      @@josephmelton4721 maybe if you had more time on your hands you'd be able to research and see where we are at, you're a free range tax slave as it is, you think it's going to get better for you or any of us? you really have no clue bro, not agreeing with that guy but you're dead wrong yourself

  • @susanpgottardi
    @susanpgottardi Рік тому +5

    Dr. John David Ebert’s knowledge and wisdom is immense and v well communicated. I will start following him. Thanks for organizing.

  • @alexrose9487
    @alexrose9487 3 роки тому +13

    brillant talk, thank you john david and the mill series

  • @bigboomer8739
    @bigboomer8739 3 роки тому +41

    Ebert looks a whole lot like Spengler.

    • @AFC0712
      @AFC0712 3 роки тому +2

      Spengler would be spinning in his grave.

    • @svalbard01
      @svalbard01 7 місяців тому +2

      Doppelspengler

  • @brianogmacgabhann6913
    @brianogmacgabhann6913 3 роки тому +12

    It’s great to get new material from John when you’ve been watching the older videos for years. Don’t get me wrong I will always cycle through the older material but prescient developments give rise to questions I would love to hear John answer e.g I always wanted to ask John about the West European American organisms Caesar era and how it relates to national populism and trump etc. You guys provide such answers and I’m grateful for that not to mention the great deal of thought and intelligence you bring in this video and the sit down interview with John.

  • @Levi_170
    @Levi_170 3 роки тому +32

    The transitions to the texts his referring to is nicely done. Thank you.

  • @valpergalit
    @valpergalit 2 роки тому +9

    It wouldn’t be a John David Ebert video without a meltdown over astrology.

  • @timothymacdonnell9079
    @timothymacdonnell9079 2 роки тому +3

    This is mind-blowing!

  • @21stCenturyDub
    @21stCenturyDub 3 роки тому +3

    Thanks for bringing JDE to lecture.

  • @chemist7925
    @chemist7925 2 роки тому +3

    Mr. Ebert is - like Spengler was - a representative of an "aussterbende Spezies": A "Universalgelehrter". A refreshment to the mind.

  • @lamodedepinktag
    @lamodedepinktag 3 роки тому +3

    Fantastic. Very well organised lecture, with a lot of time for questions. Half the importance of the lecture is on Q &A part. Very good filming and editing of the event, too. Thank you for posting this.

  • @TreatyofHistory96
    @TreatyofHistory96 2 місяці тому

    This lecture changed my belief system. Equivalent to death experience.

  • @core-nix1885
    @core-nix1885 3 роки тому +41

    Got to say, JDE is built like an absolute unit. Love the chad body language.

    • @swordoflight56
      @swordoflight56 3 роки тому +13

      Judge Holden energy.

    • @svalbard01
      @svalbard01 3 роки тому +10

      Total unit. Probably lays on his desk sometimes while lecturing and audience knows it's natural ease, zero pretence.

    • @choggerboom
      @choggerboom 3 роки тому +4

      Love when he gesticulates with a T-Rex hand approach

    • @choggerboom
      @choggerboom 3 роки тому +5

      @@swordoflight56 going through his blood meridian series, and how while he’d expand about judge Holden and his encyclopedic-sanguinary-quests, whilst lecturing to us himself (JDE) about geographical histories of river states and meso-American myths, with I the student, and kid, listening to this hypnotic and well-delivered riff of an account by this bald, giant man, was not lost on me. It would not surprise me one bit if this lecture could be found in the Texas State McCarthy archives

    • @thebrickton1947
      @thebrickton1947 10 місяців тому

      Compared to the nutless f-bomb like that like keeps asking boot like the proletariat like hero hopes like others will see him like one day, like so he can like finally get like some pussy. 'It's not fair, I want to be like Spartacus'

  • @SimonYrtep
    @SimonYrtep 6 місяців тому

    What an incredible lecture, I am stunned

  • @tomscullin
    @tomscullin 2 роки тому +1

    Magnificent lecture. Thank you.

  • @clickaccept
    @clickaccept 3 роки тому +8

    Completion of Western mathematics seems to be a stark utility triumphing over meaning. The neural network. It is like a birth of a new religion in itself - the aspiration to emulate life in AI and demonstrate materialism by experimentation.

  • @fergalbyrne9223
    @fergalbyrne9223 3 роки тому +3

    Fascinating talk. Shocking however to hear you describe Buddha as a nihilist. As you probably know, nihilism is the rejection of all religious and moral principles, that life is meaningless. But Buddhism does indeed have values and principles...Nirvana, wisdom, and compassion - to name a few.

  • @TheMountainBeyondTheWoods
    @TheMountainBeyondTheWoods 2 роки тому +1

    This was absolutely fascinating.

  • @misty671
    @misty671 3 роки тому +1

    Fantastic presentation and Q & A. Captivating ideas. tx🍻

  • @JW-ue1xg
    @JW-ue1xg 3 роки тому +6

    Great talk. Thanks very much. I was hoping someone would ask him his views on how modern China fits in the Spenglerian scheme. John mentioned that the Sinic civilisation had its own modern phase, peaked around 1500 AD and, along with India, is now in a state of slumber. Is contemporary China now a copy/outgrowth of the West's Faustian civilisation (think of its modern cities and skyscrapers, technological drive, as well as its nascent space programme)?

    • @taigueogede6711
      @taigueogede6711 3 роки тому +2

      @18107863 I'm no expert on Chinese history, but Spengler actually said that the Qin represented the begininning of China's Imperial age and that Qin Shi Huang was China's Caesar. So the summer of Chinese Culture was actually the whole Spring and Autumn period, with Confucius appearing at the end of it as the bearer of the Culture's most ripe philosophy (essentially the Chinese Kant or Aristotle). Thus, the Warring States period is the Civilisation phase, its wars being analogous to the Punic Wars and the World Wars. And then you have Qin and everything after.
      I just did a bit of research and I found something interesting which adds weight to the Qin is Caesar idea. Spengler says every Culture from birth to old age/Imperialism has a lifetime of 1000 years. He also said every Culture's first expression is death-related in some way (Greek geometric funerary urns, Egyptian tomb-temples, Early Christian sarcophagi, Gothic cathedrals in which the death and resurrection of Christ is re-enacted). Well, if you look 1000 years back from Qin Shi Huang you get the first inscribed oracle bones (c.1250 BC): en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oracle_bone which were found in the Ruins of Yin, the last capital city of the Shang: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yinxu
      These were used for divination which often focused on ancestors, and they were ritually buried alongside the dead.
      Finally, you said the Chinese prime symbol is stability. I don't believe this is something Spengler has exactly set forth. I have also seen an idea, maybe from Toynbee, that it is the "Winding Path of Nature", which is an image gleaned from the two great rivers. I recently read a part of Prussianism and Socialism in which Spengler claims the words "Tao" and "Li" are strong indicators of the fundamental essence of Chinese culture. These are the natural order and flow of the Universe. It seems to me that the Chinese prime symbol must be something nature-related (from what I can tell your painting often depicts nature and your literature is full of nature analogies) that gives rise to a preoccupation with stability.

  • @ozmer
    @ozmer 3 роки тому +5

    Tremendously lucid overview of Spengler's Decline of the West.

  • @George-nh1er
    @George-nh1er 3 роки тому +6

    The ice caps aren't melting and to say they are isn't a fact it's a lie. Other than that the rest of this was good.

    • @Neuromancer2020
      @Neuromancer2020 3 роки тому +1

      Explain

    • @Pay2winboi
      @Pay2winboi 3 роки тому

      @@Neuromancer2020 india has glaciers melting lol

    • @southafricanizationofsociety20
      @southafricanizationofsociety20 3 роки тому +4

      “Recent mapping of a number of raised beach ridges on the north coast of Greenland suggests that the ice cover in the Arctic Ocean was greatly reduced some 6000-7000 years ago. The Arctic Ocean may have been periodically ice free.”
      -Science News, 2008, Norway

  • @elgreatestweight
    @elgreatestweight 3 роки тому +5

    @43:00 Feuerbach is properly a vitalist, along with Nietzsche, Klages, etc. not an empty shallow vision with Spencer et. al. read Paul Bishop's work. The Indian case is complicated by tantric Saiva philosophy (Pratyabhijna darsana: Abhinavagupta, Ksemaraja, Utpaladeva) and tantric Indian Buddhism (spread to Tibet), to say nothing of cultural fusion (chan/zen, Islam in India, etc.). Would like to see Spengler's model compared against that of Steve Farmer ("Syncretism in the West," "Neurobiology, Layered Texts, and
    Correlative Cosmologies: A Cross-Cultural Framework for Premodern History"). Perhaps Spengler himself is replaying the old 4/5 degenerating world ages mytheme of (some strains of) Laurasian mythology? Witzel ("Origins of the World's Mythologies") believes this to be a later version of the original mytheme of (ascending) world-ages, found in Mesoamerican myth. Good talk.

  • @adrianc1264
    @adrianc1264 3 роки тому +2

    I'd love JDE to expand on the idea he touched on of future events affecting the past, ie the present

    • @Dieguito-gy1dw
      @Dieguito-gy1dw 3 роки тому

      He breaks down the destiny idea found in Spengler’s writing in his recent series on Decline of the West

  • @JHimminy
    @JHimminy 3 роки тому +5

    Seems to be a fractal nature to history. E.g. astrology is a springtime activity for Spengler, then Ebert mentions astrology was born in Sumer at the dawn of civilizations.

  • @masterful9954
    @masterful9954 3 роки тому +3

    FINALLY!! thanks!

  • @pwmiles56
    @pwmiles56 2 роки тому +1

    Great stuff. I've been playing the Spengler-future game for about 25 years now. I thought 911 Saddam and Osama were parallels to the Jugurthine war (112-106 BC or so), which kicked off the Caesarism phase with Marius and Sulla. However, that model hasn't played out -- yet. The bigger parallel could be with the civil wars that followed. They were fought between Romans, the prize was Rome, but the actual wars happened far from Rome. Cheers from England!

  • @Dieguito-gy1dw
    @Dieguito-gy1dw 3 роки тому +16

    56:45 “anglo capitalism” as the shopping mall world view.... was that really an Anglo world view? or another cultural influence?

    • @Pay2winboi
      @Pay2winboi 3 роки тому

      @@metatron748 and those are?...

    • @RealAugustusAutumn
      @RealAugustusAutumn 3 роки тому +5

      You're absolutely correct, but Anglo culture allowed itself to be overtaken. Anglos have been heavily influenced by Scots, who have a strong libertarian ethic.

    • @bigboomer8739
      @bigboomer8739 3 роки тому +2

      @@RealAugustusAutumn I was thinking the "Swiss"

    • @RealAugustusAutumn
      @RealAugustusAutumn 3 роки тому +9

      @@bigboomer8739 Dude, I don't even remember writing this comment. Idk why tf I would blame the Scots when we all know Finklesteins don't come from the Highlands.

  • @oswaldspengler1823
    @oswaldspengler1823 3 роки тому +7

    sam harris' mom made the golden girls TV show

  • @user-mf3oc6mj5l
    @user-mf3oc6mj5l 3 роки тому +4

    Trump is not Ceasar. Elon Musk is Ceasar. Homology is not analogy. An expression of ceasarism doesn't need to be similar to Ceasar, but it does need to reflect the civilization's shift from old sources of meaning towards personal charisma.

    • @coolstorybro6076
      @coolstorybro6076 3 роки тому

      Elon Musk is definitely not Caesar.... he's not the all-powerful genius you and the media make him out to be. Bill Gates is more like a caesar as he's involved in global politics, but still no caesar by far! JFK could have been a new caesar but they rightfully assassinated him

    • @Th3BigBoy
      @Th3BigBoy 3 роки тому

      @@coolstorybro6076 Kingslayer.

  • @John-lf3xf
    @John-lf3xf 3 роки тому +1

    6:16. The computer program of least size which can generate all plants. The Kolmogorov complexity is ≤ Σ |x_i|.

  • @Rdogman12345678
    @Rdogman12345678 Рік тому

    Excellent

  • @kernelsandoz
    @kernelsandoz 2 роки тому +1

    Is the subliminal flashing of Sam Harris deliberate or an editing fault ?

  • @TheJamesNigra
    @TheJamesNigra 2 роки тому

    Love his talk on the ever present origin by gebser. the guy just gets it.

  • @southafricanizationofsociety20
    @southafricanizationofsociety20 3 роки тому +18

    The last 3 minutes:
    That student has no idea who he’s sided with. Very naive student. Idealist & liberalist. Siding with the barbarians.

    • @peanutarbuckle7397
      @peanutarbuckle7397 3 роки тому +1

      He spent a lot of time letting everyone know what a good kneeler he is. Kant.

  • @c4call
    @c4call 2 роки тому +1

    From what I know of history, I think scholars should look more into the effect that the security of the individual has on these stages of civilization. I find that, regardless of level of technological advancement, at whatever level the civilization is in, the "mood" of the days is strongly determined by the security felt by the average member of that civilization. If everyone feels pretty safe, because crime is at all-time lows within the civilization and wars are only on the periphery, nihilism sets in, because... well.... "where's the fun in that?" Basically... without the drama of violence and aggression and retaliation, as the state develops a degree of organization that affords it immunity to internal threats, and security from external threats, this sets the stage for a sudden flip as citizens start viewing the state itself as something to be plundered, and fellow citizens as targets for them to use the state to abuse and victimize for personal gain (caesarism, imperialism, etc).

  • @sickjuicysjamshack3580
    @sickjuicysjamshack3580 3 роки тому +1

    1:20:30 Minor nitpick, the Romans did cross the Rhine several times after Teutoberg, including during several successful retaliatory campaigns, and again successfully under Marcus Aurelius in the Marcomanni Wars. The Romans did stop trying to consolidate Magna Germania into its empire, but that's more of a cost-benefit thing, the lands of Germany were very poor and would have cost more to maintain than they would have brought back in revenue

  • @mariakatariina8751
    @mariakatariina8751 11 місяців тому

    14:41 Wird generates from the Suomi words "virta" - the flow, current, energy; and the word "verta" - blood, bloodflow, nation.

  • @AFC0712
    @AFC0712 3 роки тому +1

    I wonder if these previous civilisations reflected on their demise as we do now, and knowing we can't do anything about to reverse the sitiuation.

  • @allen5455
    @allen5455 2 роки тому +1

    Why did the Beats so love Sphlingler? What simularities exist between Marx and Sphlingler? ...And the "angel of history"?

  • @sneedle252
    @sneedle252 3 роки тому +1

    I'm curious about what aspects of the Mesopotamian worldview influenced Ebert's.

  • @russellcook3922
    @russellcook3922 2 роки тому +2

    Love the Sam Harris reference!

  • @keyboarddancers7751
    @keyboarddancers7751 3 роки тому +3

    1:31:08 Astrology. One thing about astrology is that as far as I know, it has no history of being used to manipulate or deceive people or of being used to dominate others and virtually always seems to search for positive or aspirational aspects and objectives in life. Also it has no impact on those who do not engage with it. This cannot be said of most religions throughout the ages.

    • @BlGGESTBROTHER
      @BlGGESTBROTHER Місяць тому

      It's not a religion, and it definitely has a negative impact on people because it leads them to make irrational choices based on pseudoscience. The rest if the talk was good, but him just asserting astrology as correct with 0 evidence was rather annoying.

  • @TEFFTPATTERN
    @TEFFTPATTERN 3 роки тому +5

    Ironically, by calling oneself a cultural critic, you are taking up an acting role in the great play Spengler illustrated. When a society turns to the stage of endlessly critiquing itself and steamrolling it’s own pillars and deconstructing it’s own culture, so begins the endless decline to inevitable destruction. It’s literally in the book he’s talking about.

    • @carlyellison8498
      @carlyellison8498 3 роки тому

      Wrong.

    • @Th3BigBoy
      @Th3BigBoy 3 роки тому +1

      @@carlyellison8498 I want to hear what you have to say, if you would indulge me.

    • @emanuelpetre5491
      @emanuelpetre5491 2 роки тому +2

      Well so did Spengler and so do you. The idea that a civilization should last forever is Faustian in itself.

    • @matthewparlato5626
      @matthewparlato5626 Рік тому +1

      The wests individual haunts you.
      Ebert is an overweight brilliant autodidact.
      He's just being...
      Now exhale yourself and be,
      where you are..
      ...and in temporal relationship to your decaying society as well
      BVD and Ebert are a blast to listen to!

    • @user-ic4ce8xb5v
      @user-ic4ce8xb5v Рік тому +3

      you are confusing the prescriptive with the descriptive. death of the culture is inevitable according to this theory. it's a description not a prescription. having cultural critics who realize that the founding myth of the culture is untenable is part of the natural process. If you are upset at the participants of the fourth stage, then you are missing the whole point of the work.

  • @paisios2541
    @paisios2541 2 роки тому +3

    He even looks like Spengler. Talk about morphology.

  • @moviereviews1446
    @moviereviews1446 2 роки тому +1

    JDE is easily one of the most educated man of our time.

  • @timothykuring3016
    @timothykuring3016 Рік тому

    When I was reading Spengler in the eighties, you couldn't quote him, because people just dismissed him as a Nazi philosopher/historian.
    Of course, I didn't agree, but no one else would read his work.

  • @Catonius
    @Catonius Рік тому +1

    meso-america had corn & potatoes...

  • @CrudForge
    @CrudForge 2 роки тому

    Bro you referred to the Faustians as Magians like a dozen times.

  • @avoidbeing
    @avoidbeing 3 роки тому

    great routine

  • @fauxiconoclast4654
    @fauxiconoclast4654 3 роки тому +1

    17:10 Who's dog is that? lol

  • @thermionic1234567
    @thermionic1234567 3 роки тому +18

    The Democrats have two private armies: Antifa and Black Lives Matter. Your comparison was not only valid, but also sadly-prophetic.

  • @almilligan7317
    @almilligan7317 3 роки тому

    How do you know what you know? How are synthetic apriorí statements possible? That they are is not the question. So then is there a better world view and if so doesn’t that falsify Spengler‘s idea of organic civilization? Not all civilizations are organic if one isn’t. And if there was one exception then that would defeat the argument. How do we know until all the cards are played out. Thus we are justified in believing we don’t know everything.

  • @HonkyTonkManYeah
    @HonkyTonkManYeah Рік тому

    1:18:40 , 1:15:05

  • @Catonius
    @Catonius Рік тому +1

    the Romans regularly took excursions across the Rhine after Teutoberg, this guy talks lots of bull.

  • @stevenwong2021
    @stevenwong2021 2 роки тому

    22:00

  • @christianrenno
    @christianrenno 3 роки тому

    1:20:06

  • @metokyo4960
    @metokyo4960 3 роки тому

    The histo-info salad properly dressed with the cult white stripes on the black foundation t-shirt

  • @kermitfrog593
    @kermitfrog593 2 роки тому

    And only a couple months after this lecture the carnies stormed the Capitol while US senators cowered for their lives under chairs. How prescient.

    • @tylerdavis520
      @tylerdavis520 6 місяців тому +1

      That was an FBI false flag

    • @kermitfrog593
      @kermitfrog593 6 місяців тому

      @@tylerdavis520 No it wasn't.

    • @tylerdavis520
      @tylerdavis520 6 місяців тому

      @@kermitfrog593 bless your soul

  • @greenflamingoentertainment8613
    @greenflamingoentertainment8613 3 роки тому +4

    knowing of many facts, does not equate to insight, or wisdom. This does not depict Spengler, as he depicts himself by his own words. I do not glean much wisdom by this 'academic' and his many words.

    • @svalbard01
      @svalbard01 3 роки тому

      What would be insightful about depicting someone with the words they use to depict themselves? Isn't that just quoting? I don't get your point as you've expressed it.

  • @Jurrasick
    @Jurrasick 10 днів тому

    so many brainlets in that student audience. So much parroting, so much regurgitation of the morals and ethics of the age. They can't even begin to leave Plato's cave because they can't even begin to wonder about other perspectives outside of the ones they're rooted in. Some good questions, but some questions were hard to listen to because they began with assumptions that we can't make or share anymore.

  • @Catonius
    @Catonius Рік тому

    Anglo-Europe aka England.

  • @laikakhan1313
    @laikakhan1313 7 днів тому

    what a silly interpretation................cant go into details. too many opinions threaded in the interpretation

  • @MyNextShotWontMiss
    @MyNextShotWontMiss 3 роки тому +3

    1:46:12 Idiot Antifa alert.

    • @Vingul
      @Vingul 2 роки тому

      Unsurprising ghey upspeak cadence.

  • @st.michaelsknight6299
    @st.michaelsknight6299 Рік тому

    Okay your dead wrong on it only being northern europe. Thats only true if you take a liberal lense. When you dispense of liberalism, Italy and Spain have both made huge contributions.

  • @g8trdone
    @g8trdone 3 роки тому

    Anybody that brings BS global warming into a "class" like this is a damned fool.

  • @goyobartoli6803
    @goyobartoli6803 3 роки тому +4

    Interesting talk but pretty dismissive and bit patronising to your fellas question telling him he's just wrong and he doesn't care what he thinks. It's quite a sweeping statement to state atheism leads to nihilism to violence so new religious sentiment is needed. This rejection of rationalism leading to growth of religious expression surely carries with it also acts of and threats of violence. Immediate example is various fundamentalist Islamic groups and jihadism. Looking to the west specifically there has been a massive growth in conservatism which generally draws in the more religiously fervent, expressing itself particularly through populism which at part of its core involves a rejection of truth, divide and conquer, resentment and the idea they are always under attack. Far right groups holding a combination of these conservative, Christian, nationalist views carry a very real threat of violence. Christian evangelicalism the path its evolving down overlaps and also carries violence wether it be through they re growing belief the rapture and end times is imminent or they re more hardcore conservatism regarding society. As a recent phenomena Qanon could also placed in here with the rejection of rationality to believe in an absolute fantasy that also carries with it a threat of violence. I could see how it could be argued that this has happened as a result of nihilism and people seeking to find meaning in their lives through some form of faith but personally I would find that disingenuous. Perhaps it could even be the case that this new rise of religious/conservative ideas lead to fear that leads to violence. History is full of religious violence.
    I might be remembering this section wrong but from reading Spengler I took his ideas for the Winter that it would be a rise for forms of radicalism relative to the current civilisation and he termed the instigators Youths? I didn't take it to mean specifically always a rejection of rationalism for religious ideas but that it could take many forms. Wherever anyone stands on their views/support of these groups like the rise of populism , far right militia groups, jihadism, BLM, antifa etc I'm not here to comment on that but they could all be viewed as symptoms of this radicalism of which not all are exclusively coming from nihilism or religion for that matter.

    • @tchek1980
      @tchek1980 3 роки тому +3

      I was agreeing with J D Ebert until the part where he said that the guy was wrong over his worldview, I think it was a poor response by JDE.

    • @2fiafisdoafw34
      @2fiafisdoafw34 3 роки тому +11

      Anti-rationalism is a symptom of the end of rationalist era and the beginning of second religiousness. We're at the transition phase for sure. The leftists zaelotism, right populism, religious growth, jihadism, indigenism, feminism, BLM, etc. are just expressions of that, some of them lies into the _arguments_ of iluminist humanitarian morality, some of them deny them. Even there are groups mixed: I see muslim-converted feminist, feminists seeking for animist cults (african, native american), hinduism, buddism; and some sort of "traditionalists" that are completely empty of methaphysical trascendent component and belives in darwinism. It's just a phase of transition, in the future all of them will be deeply religious, and by the way West is not tolerant with the non-believers, simply the winner will chase the loser; authentic witch-hunt.
      I see clearly, who will be the winner. Do you?

    • @goyobartoli6803
      @goyobartoli6803 3 роки тому

      Joakin Molina I couldn't say for certain who ll win but for the general population the majority will be worse off.

    • @Ethan-fh9lq
      @Ethan-fh9lq 3 роки тому

      This is a great comment but dude, you’ve got to use paragraph breaks.

    • @skyjuiceification
      @skyjuiceification Рік тому

      All of this just proves that it's the Chinese who will colonize space.

  • @AFC0712
    @AFC0712 3 роки тому

    53:22 "nervous time..." - you've Joe Biden now...good luck!

  • @RealAugustusAutumn
    @RealAugustusAutumn 3 роки тому +4

    He really should've stopped at Spengler. The rest is just his own personal bs views about race and how America is a mEltInG PoT.

  • @Ben-go9rk
    @Ben-go9rk 3 роки тому +3

    This is the most surface level lecture I’ve ever seen. Essentially just a recap of what Spengler says without any of the nuance that’s available in his hundreds of pages on the topic

    • @carlyellison8498
      @carlyellison8498 3 роки тому +8

      The book is better than the UA-cam video?

    • @Vingul
      @Vingul 2 роки тому +10

      You seriously mean to say that Ebert didn’t pack all of the nuance of several hundred pages into a less than two hour lecture? Shocking stuff.